“Constitutional Expert” Barack Obama Doesn’t Believe in the First Amendment
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Before entering politics, former President Barack Obama was a professor of constitutional law. He certainly knows that the First Amendment protects our right to speak freely, whether we’re right or wrong, in private or in public. When he says that social media platforms should moderate content more aggressively, and then says that we also need “democratic oversight” of the process, he knows what that implies. President Obama doesn’t misunderstand the U.S. Constitution; he rejects it.
Check out the full episode this clip was featured in here: • The Government Is Behi...
Subscribe and ring the notification bell so you don’t miss a single video!
Follow Dad Saves America on Substack: dadsavesameric...
Subscribe to the podcast: dadsavesameric...
Make a tax-deductible donation to Dad Saves America: secure.anedot....
_____________________________________
Our Website: www.dadsavesam...
_____________________________________
Dad Saves America explores the philosophies and practical steps we need to raise capable, curious, independent adults ready to thrive in a virtuous free society... and want to keep it that way.
We’ve had many experts in the studio, including Jonathan Haidt, Dr. Drew Pinsky, Troy Kotsur, John Mackey, Ben Askren, and Adam Carolla.
#censorship #bigtech #obama
If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on RUclips or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future!
www.dadsavesamerica.com
"That doesn't mean some things aren't truer than others"
I've read a line like that before. It was in a book about a farm
I thought it was about how some were more equal than others.
@@jonahansen yes, and Obama said some things are more true than others. It's not the exact line, but it is similar, and that reasoning would be used to suppress the less true just like the less equal would be oppressed
@@alexgaudette988 Four legs good, but a pig on two legs with a waistcoat and whisky is better.
@@alexgaudette988 You are totally correct. I was just being a smart-ass. It was a clever comment on your part. I guess they both fall under the "slippery slope" category with associated bad results.
His Secretary of State from 2013-2017 doesn't believe in the First Amendment either. Noticing a trend here.
20 years ago that video would have never seen the light of day.
He literally talks about the first amendment being used to check government power but then wants to use government power to limit that.
"Value judgements" like saying you can't define man or woman? Girl or boy? You can't tell the world what happened when your husband suddenly claims he's "mom" too? This already happens.
Two words - Hunter’s Laptop
yep! That got me kicked off twitter and I haven't been back.
Is a contracted word one word?
@@Fluffy_Rumples LOL a contraction is one word.
@@Fluffy_Rumples possessive is not a contraction.
Recently, John Kerry admitted his disdain for the first amendment as well.
That video of Kerry at the WEF is truly appalling. He flies around on a private jet decrying America's basic rights in the name of the "climate crisis". It's a layer cake of hypocrisy.
@@DadSavesAmerica Interestingly enough, the WEF used to allow comments on their RUclips channel until the whole "you vill own nuhzing und be happy" advertisement herr Schwaby posted a few years ago. Guess nobody took too kindly to an NGO admitting they were going to run the world.
We have the 2nd amendment for John Kerry...a tool of global elite.
It is not by great acts but by small failures that freedom dies. The sense of justice dies slowly in a people. They grow used to the unthinkable, and sometimes they may look back and even wonder when things changed. They will not find a day or a time or a place. Justice and liberty die quietly, because men first learn to ignore injustice and then no longer recognize it.
Charles Morgan
"Only a few prefer liberty- the majority seek nothing more than fair masters."
Sallust
Sallust was a historian and politician at the end of the Roman Republic. He was a partisan in favor of Julius Caesar. It seems he was observing something amongst the Romans. Those who think they should be shepherding humanity towards their green and sustainable 4th Industrial Revolution vision of the future believe this, too, as far as I can tell.
Beautiful words!
I lost respect for obama when he took that first sip of filtered water in Flint, MI to prove it's safe.
Right? Personally, I haven't trusted the party since Clinton and his south American activities. But jezus krist, that Flint stunt was so evil and gross.
People don't seem to realize how close we are to being back to serfdom/peasantry. If you weren't born into this world with money, you will never have it. There is no moving up from your class anymore. There is only rich and the poor. I made the wise decision of investing with my FA Abby Joseph Cohen and that has been my financial saving grace in this trying times
I know this FA, Abby Joseph Cohen Services but only by her reputation at Goldman Sachs; even though she's now involved in managing portfolios and providing investmnt guidance to clients. I have been trying to get in contact since I watched her interview on WSJ last month
@@EalDieguezWell her name is 'ABBY JOSEPH COHEN SERVICES'. Just research the name. You'd find necessary details to work with a correspondence to set up an appointment.
I went from no money to lnvest with to busting my A** off on Uber eats for four months to raise about $20k to start trading with Abby Joseph Cohen. I am at $128k right now and LOVING that you have to bring this up here
I plan to retire at 62 in another country outside the US that is free, safe and very cheap with a high quality of life. I could fully just rely on only my SS if I wanted to when that times arrives but I'll also have at least one pension, a 403 (b) and a very prolific lnvestment account.
@@DennisSoklovWhat country you moving too?I'm headed to Thailand or the Philippines in 4 years.
Walz the Democrat VP doesn’t believe in the first amendment either.
you're a liar.
@@LindaMcification
You're a liar.
Walz has said that there’s “no right to misinformation or hate speech” which is a very serious and dangerous misrepresentation of our first amendment protection.
We have the right to say whatever we want in this country with very very narrow and specific exceptions. “Hate speech” and “misinformation” are explicitly NOT in the small set of exceptions.
The ACLU actually defended white supremacists right to free speech.
"They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution." Henry Wallace on fascism Worth looking up the NYT article from 1944
He never did.
He didn't like the 2nd, 4th, 5th, ....etc.
Pretty much that entire "Bill of Negative Rights" that put Restrictions on the Government - instead of the Ignorant Flyover Proles.
Very dangerous
I still remember delivering a pizza one day to a guy who had a print of a drawing of MLK and Obama...as if Obama was some kind of moral spiritual leader. It weirds me out the way there is this hole filled by Christianity in our culture that has rapidly been filled with by Progressive ideas.
And the American Left constantly denigrates Christianity and the nuclear family specifically because they want all allegiance to go to an all-powerful state.
This Stanford alum is distressed by what happened there
The public ought to ask for the immediate, signed public oaths to protect and defend the constitution the United States of America, of all federal legislators Senators and Congresspersons.
Oh, well, I guess it's OK, as long as it's 'democratic' oversight. /s
Leftists speak only to manipulate, never to elucidate.
We have a FEDERAL republic
That man is evil
limiting free speech is like limiting breathing
If you're still sending your children to public school, this is what they are being taught right now
Sigh*
I definitely don't trust government to arbitrate truth :/
Big government, perhaps. The farther away from local relationships, the greater the likelihood for corruption. Word gets around town eventually that someone is behaving badly. That's why, in part, I think the Founders wanted a limited government. It helps, too, if a representative represents a smaller number of people. Once the constituency gets to be too large, people feel disaffected and don't known one another well enough to know their character.
Wow, well said! This Dad approves of your efforts to save America! :)
Thanks, my brother!
"all animals are equal but some animals are equaler than others" comes to mind
So glad to have found you. Such a sensible voice.
OMG I think you're suggesting that Barack is full of sh*t. How long until the world catches up to you on this topic?
I like it when Bloomberg and PBS turn comments off so their content can’t be scrutinized by the public.
What is happening here is someone who has cred by way of having a degree in a domain is using it as an argument from authority to persuade people about something that is NOT correct or concordant.
Stand.
Or kneel. A time for choosing.
This. Could we get more of this all over the internet, please.
This is more indication that Barack Obama is still running things.
I agree to a degree, but when he was potus someone was pulling his puppet strings too. any ideas on who that might be?
Alphabet boys run the government since they killed JFK and took over
An ever morphing cabal of special interests. It would be easy to name a half dozen. @BookZealots
An ever morphing cabal of special interests. It would be easy to name a half dozen. There is an argument that this is the form the republic was meant to take and that is the source of its strength. If you want to look at history objectively it could be said that the US supports its enemies when that serves its interests.@BookZealots
Really good channel
I really appreciate that, thank you!!
More and more people fall below the poverty line every day. I know because im one of them. I work full time and cant afford a stupid apartment.
The increase in housing costs is completely INSANE. I feel for you brother.
It's not about making the world a better place, it about making the world a more equal place. Hyper democracy and the gnostic impulse.
The average wealth per adult in the world at the end of 2022 was $84,718, a 3.6% decrease from the previous year. This was the first time since the global financial crisis of 2008 that global net household wealth had decreased.
1.2% of adults own 47.8% of the world's wealth, while 53.2% of adults own 1.1%.
Expect this trend to continue
God bless America 🇺🇸
Professionalizing communication would be the path to take. He is propagating authoritarianism.
FBO !
Very important video. 1984 is upon us.
It's a prelude to Logan's Run and utopia
All tv news is self classified as entertainment today. No moral loop holes needed i guess.
Yes, he is a constitutional expert. He's an expert in subverting and undermining it!
Just because sotero uses the U S Constitution as toilet paper doesn't mean he's an expert
Study your enemy to know how to defeat him.
I've never met the person wise enough, knowledgeable enough, or free enough of the corrupting influence of power to choose for me what information my mind should be exposed to. Have you?
My god, he's messed up. He really, really doesn't understand the danger of the government deciding what can and can't be said. Did he learn nothing from history?
When the liars are supposedly the ones creating the benchmark of what's true, that's when you realize we're in trouble as a society.
Walz tried to use the 'fire in crowded theater' red herring in the debate last night and continued to justify his call for censorship of 'misinformation' and 'hate speech'. I'd like to know who he thinks gets to decide that.
What happened to the cook,was it the butler,baker or candlestick maker,someone was died on his property 🤔🧐
Thanks for looking into this topic and sorry that one of your videos was censored. Good luck with the struggle.
Everyone is equal. However, some people are more equal than others.
At 2:27, accountability to the dollar. Period!
Big govt - big corperation. Thats fascism
Great post.
Let private companies censor as they see fit. Then, let the customer decide. The Free Market will take care of this.
“Isn’t that the good news.” 😂
Well, there are certainly too many people around here.
A foreign muslim doesn't believe in american values.
Shocking.
Once content moderation starts, then those "platforms" become publishers and are subject to the full force of litigation. So, sure, start making those editorial decisions.
BTW astrophysicists "pursue" black holes because they display physics *at the extreme.*
Free speech was tolerable when it was limited in speed and scope of distribution.
But technology has given it the ability to be instantaneous and pervasive, which is a problem for those who depend on propaganda.
Some are perfectly subjective.
Internet…printing presses. Same same. This guy would have sided with George III and gone after Patrick Henry.
... slick Willy in 'BLACK FACE'....
This is disturbing. No first amendment, no USA. We must move very very carefully here. There are problems to be sure but the first amendment must be absolute. If wrongdoing occurs, then the wrongdoers must be specifically prosecuted through due process. Everything else is subjective and open to abuse. The drafters of the Bill of Rights knew this, that's why the first amendment's text is so clear and absolute.
Check out the proposed 28th Amendment
@@sdrc92126 Can you elaborate? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
@@rockapedra1130 Proposed by Newsome to limit the second
As I think about the structure and logic of our republic, does having representatives build into the system an important avenue for redress of grievances?
Most people don't believe in the First Amendment. #funfact
Most people are idiots.
Another fun fact.
@@Bgrosz1 Hope that you aren't trying to find someone to debate a contrary opinion. 🤣
@@MidNightRider2001 Most, not all. It's an impediment to the i slam long game
"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."
- President Elect Barack Hussein Obama
Oct 30, 2008
Emperor Barack, sounds good to him.
Guaranteed they got tapes of Diddy and Obama
“Content moderation..” AKA censorship. Typical word salad to obfuscate the truth.
Just when I thought this guy had a functioning brain he had to turn to bizarre right wing narratives.
When they say too many people, what they mean is too many white people
Population collapse is less of a concern with AI and Automation futures.
The United States Constitution is the supreme Law of the land. No court, legislature or executive order can alter anyone’s right to bear arms UNLESS the constitution is amended. All other legislation regarding restrictions to bearing of arms including concealed carry is unconstitutional. You cannot misinterpret the “right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed “. The preposition to the above, expressly, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state”, provides the justification for, not a restriction of said right. It does not say that the intent of the right is to organize a Militia but that the right is to the security of a free state. The Militia is a tool within the function of securing freedom of the people. That being said the phrase” the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed “, does not give a reason for infringement of that right if not solely so related to a Militia but it gives justification for NOT infringing that right.
Article V provides the mechanism for amending the Constitution of the United States of American.
Frankly, it's difficult to find a portion of the Constitution Progressives do believe in. Other than the First Amendment's "freedom of the press" portion- though not the other portions- and section 3 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment- but not section 5- I can't think of any.
If you do not believe that Objective Truth either can be or is already known then that literally throws ALL forms of social norms out the window in a flurry of subjectivity and ANY form of instilled order afterwards is based purely on who can FORCE their way to power over other people and FORCE their ideas into their heads. If one party claims Subjective Truth and another party claims Objective Truth the subjective party will never be able to put forth an opinion based on anything other than the voices and feelings inside their own head while the objective party is free to examine the world and deduce conclusions from it. It is "Apriori" vs "Postpriori" reasoning pure and simple.
Right. Agents of the govt are obligated to follow laws that apply to the govt. otherwise, governments could hire agents to get around the constitution an all the time.
Hillary, Obama, and Kerry all saying this, and just think...the majority of people reading this comment probably voted for one of them at some point.
Barry is still owner of the sole vote I've ever cast in a United States presidential election. For a few more weeks, anyway.
And Bill Gates
When the printing press was invented, it was an upheaval. Anything on paper must be true, right? Society has come to terms with that mostly. Social media has now caused another upheaval. Everyone (in my bubble) says the same thing, so it must be true, right? We don't need censorship, we need people to figure things out.
We need the government to tell us which is which
@@sdrc92126 I agree the government should also have a say. I disagree that means shutting people up.
@@TomPortegys Hasn't the government always had a say?
@@sdrc92126 Covertly they've had their say, through MS corporate media. Now that ppl get information from social media, they've been forced to capture those companies by infiltrating them with ex in tel agents. This comment will likely get struck/hidden.
Obamy-the ultimate dei. Claiming to be a constitutional expert and knows zip about this country. What a douche.
the L E F T hates you
Thanks Dad ❤ I f*n h8 obamna
Truthier be subjectier
In order to pushback against my own ability to silo, I have to admit that the statement, "...but that doesn't mean that some things aren't truer than others" has both troublesome and non-troublesome interpretations. I mean, we all admit that - as a matter of pure fact - some things do in fact have more veracity than others. I get why we can, in a certain context, find Obama's phrase as valanced from a certain Machiavellian angle... but as a mere claim, it does check out.
Wii! Wii! Wii!
First off, I am a free speech absolutist. I'm not arguing against your main point, however you have made some unsubstantiated claims as part of your argument against government controlled "free speech". $2/day, 30 years ago, is far more money than it is today. Depending on the country, $2 a day really isn't that bad. Earned money does not represent economic stability. A farmer can earn no money, but have a farm that supplies everything that he needs, without the possibility of shortages. Middle income Americans, can have a savings and a home, but if they don't have control of their basic needs, due to market disruptions, they would be worse off than a farmer that earns no money. So, the idea of poverty is too vague to be examined closely for the sake of accuracy. As for population, there are too many people on Earth. Not too many for the planet to be able to support in the short term, but they are cramming themselves into the best parts, and destroying the natural systems in those areas. Distribution of population is an issue. If we had less people in the most preferred areas, those areas, and the remaining people, would benefit. I know that it's difficult to cover these smaller points in detail, I just wanted to point them out. Obama sucks. His Constitutional scholarship is concentrated in the area of "How to Destroy the Constitution, Using the Constitution!!"
You talk of truth as if all information is equivalent. But not everything is just an opinion: some things are established fact - for example facts established by observation, math, scientific research, or historical records.
Some truth is subjective and yes, this form of truth can be pursued by discourse. Discourse can lead people to new insights about such truth. But that discourse has to be based on facts, not on fantasy. Therefore the participants in any serious discourse should be well-informed, unbiased, and sincerely pursuing truth with an open mind. As soon as established facts are no longer considered, the discourse itself becomes false and meaningless. It will not lead to truth but to falsehood.
We do not pursue truth by confusing people with overwhelming lies and conspiracy theories, as happens on some platforms. Confusion makes it in fact more difficult to pursue truth. Social platforms that spread lies and hide facts create a false impression which endangers discourse. This is morally reprehensible and it does not serve the pursuing of truth.