Supreme Court hears Trump presidential immunity claim | Special Report

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 апр 2024
  • The Supreme Court has concluded arguments over Donald Trump's claim he is entitled to broad immunity from federal prosecution for allegedly official acts while he was in the White House. Nancy Cordes anchored CBS News' special report on the arguments.
    #news #trump #supremecourt
    CBS News 24/7 is the premier anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations that is available free to everyone with access to the internet and is the destination for breaking news, live events, original reporting and storytelling, and programs from CBS News and Stations’ top anchors and correspondents working locally, nationally and around the globe. It is available on more than 30 platforms across mobile, desktop and connected TVs for free, as well as CBSNews.com and Paramount+ and live in 91 countries.
    Subscribe to the CBS News RUclips channel: / cbsnews
    Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
    Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
    Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
    Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
    Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
    Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
    Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

Комментарии • 902

  • @lang6626
    @lang6626  +77

    Its not a matter of Biden and Trump anymore but the future of the country

  • @KwabenaWiafe-wp6qm

    It's so hard and stressful listening to these arguments. Oh my God. What is wrong with the supreme court

  • @thomasjamison2050

    Will someone please ask this guy why all the other presidents were able to fully function without immunity? Maybe it was because they didn't need it to stay out of prison?

  • @rerun3283

    Why is this even a question?

  • @RichardBrady-yc7he

    These right wing justices are disgraceful. Thomas and Alito in particular are lost in criminality themselves, how can they adjudicate?

  • @andrewpatten9829

    The Court took this appeal solely to delay the start of the trial. The arguments are patently absurd and baseless. It should have let the D.C. Circuit's decision stand.

  • @Raven-si7bm

    Can’t believe the court is actually hearing this.

  • @osmargonzales6036

    So easy to see.

  • @PP-mz4hv
    @PP-mz4hv  +54

    Staging a coup "could be" an official act? Tuesday, November 5, 2024 will be a test of all U.S.citizens.

  • @dmann1115

    If all the charges in the indictment are about non-official acts, which is the case, then why is the Supreme Court even getting involved in this matter?? Nobody is arguing that Trump was acting officially. The question of official vs. non-official doesn't even arise from the indictments!!! It's hard to see a legitimate legal question that made it necessary for SCOTUS to hear this case. It ends up serving only one purpose, and that is to delay the Jan. 6 case against Trump long enough to insure it won't be heard until after the election. Unforgivable.

  • @hanskleinjan

    This is about the ultimate credibility of the Supreme Court specifically and the US in general.

  • @andrewsims1356

    The biggest Chad move Biden could do is wait for the immunity and then refuse to give up the precidency 😂

  • @exeterline1930

    I hope Thomas was listening to discussion on bribery.

  • @jaymieholmes638

    absolutely not, NO ONE is ABOVE the law. NO ONE..

  • @johnrogers1456
    @johnrogers1456 21 день назад +16

    The Supreme Court should never have heard this case.

  • @toddmurphy523

    Immunity should just be a medical term, not a judicial term.

  • @jr499
    @jr499  +98

    It's absurd that they're even considering this. Regardless of their decision, their corruption is undeniable.

  • @anarosado5215

    No one is above the law you do a CRIME YOU THE TIME GOD IS GOOD ALL THE TIME AMEN

  • @bek7562
    @bek7562  +106

    This discussion should terrify anyone, regardless of Democrat or Republican. The precedent this could set is upsetting. At this point they’re basically just saying “should a president be allowed to manipulate the country’s system in order to permanently hold power”.

  • @NatalieWilsonDNP

    Damn!! Justice Brown-Jackson is good!!!!❤❤❤