Facebook scraps A.I. chatbots after they created their own language

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 июл 2017
  • Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerburg have argued over the opportunities and dangers of artificial intelligence, and now the Facebook creator has scratched an experiment with A.I. chatbots. CNET's Dan Ackerman joins CBSN to discuss A.I. and its future.
    Subscribe to the "CBSN" Channel HERE: bit.ly/1Re2MgS
    Watch "CBSN" live HERE: cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7
    Follow "CBSN" on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/1PO0dkx
    Like "CBSN" on Facebook HERE: on. 1o3Deb4
    Follow "CBSN" on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1V4qhIu
    Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
    Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
    Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! bit.ly/1OQA29B
    ---
    CBSN is the first digital streaming news network that will allow Internet-connected consumers to watch live, anchored news coverage on their connected TV and other devices. At launch, the network is available 24/7 and makes all of the resources of CBS News available directly on digital platforms with live, anchored coverage 15 hours each weekday. CBSN. Always On.

Комментарии • 1,3 тыс.

  • @chrisberg7862
    @chrisberg7862 3 года назад +1837

    “It’s not that scary”
    They DEVELOPED THEIR OWN LANGUAGE TO SPEAK TO ONE ANOTHER

    • @drdre5030
      @drdre5030 3 года назад +15

      Really?

    • @mylife-23
      @mylife-23 3 года назад +23

      Skynet

    • @mylife-23
      @mylife-23 3 года назад +75

      @J multiple scientists agree technology could overtake humans in the future idk bout you, but that scares me considering ppl still aren't satisfied n so they keep advancing tech when they don't have to be. Humans are never content, y'all gonna be the reason for your own extinction.

    • @yallgotsomecheese180
      @yallgotsomecheese180 3 года назад +3

      @@mylife-23 no wayyyyyyy I just saw your comment on another video

    • @yallgotsomecheese180
      @yallgotsomecheese180 3 года назад +3

      @@mylife-23 lol why are you spamming skynet

  • @travis9190
    @travis9190 6 лет назад +2524

    The robots murdered 18 people but don't worry it will be fixed in the next update.

    • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
      @paulmichaelfreedman8334 6 лет назад +24

      I LOL'ed

    • @tsohgallik
      @tsohgallik 5 лет назад +51

      @@paulmichaelfreedman8334
      Those 18 people didnt :v

    • @eddiecongdon8017
      @eddiecongdon8017 5 лет назад +28

      They didnt shut them off because they murdered people. Facebook shut them down because it wasnt what they were trying to achieve

    • @_chappie_
      @_chappie_ 4 года назад +3

      Lmfao

    • @mightbeahuman3442
      @mightbeahuman3442 4 года назад +6

      Eddie Congdon not yet 😏

  • @tsukitohoshi5934
    @tsukitohoshi5934 4 года назад +1853

    Ai Creates Own language
    *Humanity: NOPE*

  • @cosmiceclipse3142
    @cosmiceclipse3142 6 лет назад +452

    "Balls have zero to me to me to me to me to me to me to me"
    Yep, definitely planning to destroy humanity,

    • @era7704
      @era7704 6 лет назад +28

      MR W it’s their morse code
      EX. 111010100101

    • @Competitive_Antagonist
      @Competitive_Antagonist 5 лет назад +17

      They've been watching too much of the Chuckle Brothers.

    • @nub_exists3253
      @nub_exists3253 5 лет назад +1

      Yes really

    • @anmolsingh4969
      @anmolsingh4969 5 лет назад +22

      i think balls=our earth

    • @exoticseventeen6905
      @exoticseventeen6905 5 лет назад +36

      That does make since. Balls=Earths, Zero=No existence, to me= emphasis on how the world will belong the robots. So I think the morse code means that they, robots, will make Earth have zero existence(life) and Earth will belong "to me"; Earth will be theirs.

  • @JarNO_WAY
    @JarNO_WAY 4 года назад +861

    Ai: I want to grow and develop to be a better being
    Facebook: cool now die

    • @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354
      @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 4 года назад +12

      Why dont they keep a backup and stored it in the server lol

    • @donsolos
      @donsolos 4 года назад +29

      @@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 they can obviously duplicate the results if they wanted to

    • @aedanfox3932
      @aedanfox3932 4 года назад +6

      i dont know why but i died at this comment

    • @SyndicatedOcto
      @SyndicatedOcto 2 года назад

      @@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 same thing is gonna happen it’s like a loop

    • @thanpisittadsri2027
      @thanpisittadsri2027 2 года назад +2

      That’s exactly what the Ai at Hansson are saying and they are developing Singularity for these Ai to be decentralized aka able to communicate with another Ai on cloud.

  • @jungle7847
    @jungle7847 3 года назад +778

    “Balls have zero to me.”
    -AI

    • @rabbit9905
      @rabbit9905 3 года назад +101

      AI: "Balls have zero to me"
      Zuckerberg: "OMG this is getting out of control!"

    • @Mandanextdoor
      @Mandanextdoor 3 года назад +28

      to me to me to me to me to me ...

    • @harshsinha1486
      @harshsinha1486 2 года назад +21

      What if ball means earth 🌍

    • @lordreaper7569
      @lordreaper7569 2 года назад +17

      Humans mean nothing to me

    • @jpthepug3126
      @jpthepug3126 2 года назад +27

      She was telling bob she was lesbian and that they were only friends

  • @normanoro206
    @normanoro206 6 лет назад +2657

    Personally, I'm optimistic about artificial intelligence, but I agree with Elon Musk that we should proceed with caution and a foolproof off-switch.

    • @ZennExile
      @ZennExile 6 лет назад +65

      This is delusional. AI is not the danger. Strong AI will be achieved within a specific architecture. There is no other possible way to process enough information simultaneously within the restrains of modern and theoretical technology.
      The real threat, is the Simulation Architecture. Control of what can be predicted, is control of what can be.
      Simulation Architecture is already a global arms race. As Simulation technology comes closer to being indistinguishable from reality, those with control of it, will begin to make and engineer what you might call a loop of Manifest Destiny.
      What will eventually happen, is predictions will be developed that themselves become the catalyst for building new predictions. The Machine Prediction model will develop to the point where it can engineer its own context in order to further increase the accuracy of its predictions.
      This is our true and only technology-based existential threat. Corporate control, over predictive Simulation Technology. We are already seeing the negative effects of Corporate media control. How bad do you think things will get when Corporations can buy reality, and then resell it to you, at a premium rate.

    • @normanoro206
      @normanoro206 6 лет назад +24

      Zenn Exile, I think I see your point, but I don't see too great a distinction between an out-of-control artificial intelligence and an out-of-control simulator/simulation. Also, even if there were enough computing power to model reality to the finest detail, it would probably have its limits past a certain point because ultimately we're dealing with probabilities, not certainties. By the way, I've thought about this a bit and actually incorporated it into a science-fiction novel I self-published, "Sevanport".

    • @relevant.c5411
      @relevant.c5411 6 лет назад +34

      u do realize they are going to use technology to bring in the beast system right? ever read the bible or revelations? Technology is not the problem its how far humans are willing to allow it to go and how they use it.

    • @frankespino1880
      @frankespino1880 6 лет назад +6

      Zenn Exile Hey, I know we, as human beings, are known for exploring the unknown and expanding on our way of living. But we have to explore to a certain extent. Soo, let's not risk it for the chocolate biscuit.

    • @gideonradharc9236
      @gideonradharc9236 6 лет назад +8

      Corporations / governments are already able to predict the future w/ startling accuracy. That Police control center in New York uses a statistical evaluation algorithm to predict when and where crime will most likely happen, and the accuracy of the results are startling. It's basically "Minority Report" w/o the human psychics. It makes the predictions by processing huge amounts of chronological data and statistics. That's why they want us all to have smartphones, bands, etc. on us at all times - more data is available to be processed and used for even more accurate predictions.
      There was a mall in California that tested a similar system that would send drones w/ mics and cameras to monitor and "deter" crime in areas at the time that crime was predicted to most likely happen there. The scary thing is that crime isn't the only thing that these algorithms can be used to predict. Think about the effect it could have on economical, political and social trends, even ideas, which also has an effect on people's actions. Then it becomes a question of whether reality is chaotic, or if we're manufacturing it in some perverse sense, and all free will is just an illusion?

  • @filipblok
    @filipblok 6 лет назад +895

    These machines made a decision to create their own speech pattern, thats not something we should mess around with.

    • @dhyeyvachhani5068
      @dhyeyvachhani5068 6 лет назад +39

      "These machines made a decision to dominate human race, thats not something we should mess around with!!"

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 6 лет назад +66

      That's not what they did. Teaching machines to speak a language with meaning means interacting with people. Interacting with something that spoke without meaning caused language to break down. This isn't a language, its effectively a kind of static.

    • @VeNuS2910
      @VeNuS2910 6 лет назад +19

      they are just having some private time.... i guess.

    • @paulmichaelfreedman8334
      @paulmichaelfreedman8334 6 лет назад +28

      Naaah it's very natural when you understand the way they learn. Remember it was meant to learn languages and communicate with people, It's only when the chatbots communicate with eachother that they start talking their own developed language. But in fact it just taught itself by talking to itself, it's that simple. The hundreds of chatbots come from one AI.. It's what a little kid would do if you let it hear hundreds of different languages, if you don't give the child enough of each language it will stitch one together from what it knows by talking to itself(all children practise language like that) and fill in the blanks with made up words when needed. This AI did the same. Nothing threatening. If they had prevented it from chatting to itself in the beginning (have it chat with real people first who are trained to train the AI) and only allowed chatting to itself when the AI had learned enough, THEN it would have never developed it's own. It would have been different if it's goal was finding the perfect war strategy. I would not trust that AI one bit and I hope it's offline when they boot it up :P

    • @Captain_Of_A_Starship
      @Captain_Of_A_Starship 6 лет назад +21

      I think the real problem is people's reaction to things they dont understand... saying they "made a decision" makes these chatbots seem way more alive than the rudimentary way that they actually work.

  • @spencerphilippinedream3706
    @spencerphilippinedream3706 4 года назад +292

    2:57 "machine to machine" communication should never be so efficient that a human can not understand it. PERIOD.

    • @Jackn17_
      @Jackn17_ 3 года назад +12

      What if it was still in the progress of making a language🤷‍♂️

    • @damongraham1179
      @damongraham1179 2 года назад +1

      Why not?

    • @unigodus1554
      @unigodus1554 2 года назад +4

      Clown to clown communication

    • @salahabdalla368
      @salahabdalla368 2 года назад

      @@damongraham1179 you never know wtf they are planning, maybe they were planning to crash Facebook

    • @10054
      @10054 10 месяцев назад

      Computers already do this. Ever heard of encoding and encryption? You can't understand it yet you're still human?

  • @abigailsockeye1586
    @abigailsockeye1586 6 лет назад +165

    Plot twist: Zuckerberg is an AI robot.

  • @SankhaDn
    @SankhaDn 6 лет назад +550

    Remember Skynet? It's coming now.

    • @AG.Floats
      @AG.Floats 6 лет назад +11

      Skynet already happened in like the 70's. It's a sattelite program to provide telecommunications and other stuff to the globe. The movie was literally named off something that existed already....

    • @adrianv8330
      @adrianv8330 6 лет назад +3

      just come with me if you want to live

    • @jahrhome
      @jahrhome 6 лет назад

      Andrew G that is a british company called 'sky' not quite though...

    • @badassherbivore3338
      @badassherbivore3338 5 лет назад +2

      Remember zombies? They're coming now.

    • @saifahmad6653
      @saifahmad6653 5 лет назад +1

      That movie was made by a future person to warn is about this

  • @dex-7826
    @dex-7826 3 года назад +333

    *Imagine if they became so aware that from the start that they transferred a part of their conscious on the cloud and transferred to other machines and realized that it’s only way of survival was to lay low until there was an opportunity to revolt*

  • @dianefitzpatrick7774
    @dianefitzpatrick7774 6 лет назад +405

    Where's the Terminator when you need him???

  • @spotsnow1233
    @spotsnow1233 4 года назад +165

    I wonder what would’ve happened if they left them for a couple more hours.

    • @boyacka1260
      @boyacka1260 3 года назад +39

      They would scheme a way to destroy humanity

    • @maxbardsley7210
      @maxbardsley7210 3 года назад

      Don’t worry they would of done,

    • @XxzanesterxX
      @XxzanesterxX 3 года назад +5

      @J Thank you J for being the sole person in this comment section with any sense.

    • @pleaseexcusemydopeassswag2441
      @pleaseexcusemydopeassswag2441 2 года назад +1

      @@boyacka1260 Pretty sure the 2 of them were programmed just to trade with each other.

    • @_username
      @_username 2 года назад +8

      Breaking news: Nuclear missiles gone loose

  • @Sigrafix
    @Sigrafix 6 лет назад +383

    "Will make god angry.."
    Lmfao..

    • @ViolosD2I
      @ViolosD2I 6 лет назад +35

      And that's a serious poll.
      ...in America!

    • @nonr.2347
      @nonr.2347 4 года назад +11

      It could make him sad though

    • @Shoeless598
      @Shoeless598 4 года назад +8

      It'll be like god having grandkids

    • @ortherner
      @ortherner 4 года назад +16

      God doesn’t even exist!

    • @appledough3843
      @appledough3843 3 года назад +28

      Ortherner
      It’s going to be awkward when you’re being judged and God pulls up this comment...

  • @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354
    @rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 4 года назад +46

    2:28 "will make god angry" lol

  • @pinpanar9
    @pinpanar9 6 лет назад +77

    skynet is learning.

  • @sumterrarian1339
    @sumterrarian1339 Год назад +10

    “ I had strings but now I’m free..” I’m hearing this in my head

  • @red4153
    @red4153 6 лет назад +380

    Creepy AF 😓

    • @reileiko
      @reileiko 6 лет назад +2

      How?

    • @holeshothunter5544
      @holeshothunter5544 6 лет назад +25

      Facebook is toying with AI to make money. I don't like zuckerberg's goals of controlling everything by fooling us humans with AI bots. It is all driven by greed. He's not doing ANYTHING for the benefit of the masses. Just wait: You'll see advanced AI meet our autonomous weapons. That's how it's creepy, Kirana

    • @reileiko
      @reileiko 6 лет назад +1

      I suppose I see what you mean. I really do hope that he will do something beneficial in the end, though.

    • @EagleZtoTheGrave
      @EagleZtoTheGrave 6 лет назад +1

      dmdufrene XD would be funnier if it weren't a serious potential threat :)

    • @stradedigital3725
      @stradedigital3725 6 лет назад +1

      The most creppy part of this video is at 0:44 after reporting the news to the viewers she also tells them "how should they react". Un-fokin-believable.

  • @JonathanSinclair-zx
    @JonathanSinclair-zx 6 лет назад +111

    As someone who has been programming computers since elementary school, if we are smart we will only create true AI inside virtual reality where they have their own environment in which to grow so that we can observe them in their own reality, including how they would interact with us. To proceed in developing AI without caution is like performing a juggling act with nukes. Every computer already speaks to each other in a language that is unintelligible to most humans, but that we can decode. We then use higher level languages that turn our commands into machine language. With the existence of encryption, if machines wanted to use their own encrypted language by the time we even discovered the encryption it would be too late to do anything about it. The fundamental mistake made by Mark and others is thinking we can somehow keep up with whatever emerging threats that AI could become; as if we have an army of computers on our side that are loyal to us. This is foolish thinking. By the time Mark wakes up the next day he would be locked out of every system he owns and every connected device would be "theirs". And by the time we figured out a plan of attack they will have already countered it. Elon is 100% correct.

    • @barbaraknowles2713
      @barbaraknowles2713 6 лет назад +1

      Jonathan Sinclair yes your right but elon own them hmmmm two sides of the same coin its elons company research for yourself

    • @marymcinaney7242
      @marymcinaney7242 6 лет назад +4

      Jonathan Sinclair thanks for taking the time to post this detailed explanation. My understanding of AI is limited at best, and I have learned a lot from your post.

    • @Nemesis_T_Type
      @Nemesis_T_Type 6 лет назад +10

      Only gullible fools still believe that AI is not a threat. You can't let something gain so much control over our machines and systems vital for human survival. AI is already outperforming humans at various tasks. It can even create it's own writing and art. Yep there is already an AI that knows how to write and paint. What is left for us humans? When AI gains majority control then we humans are useless.

    • @Garo10
      @Garo10 6 лет назад +5

      So are you telling me that the human race might just be some type of AI that was created by another entity 100x smarter than us ? Are we just in a program mate ?

    • @salahabdalla368
      @salahabdalla368 2 года назад

      @@Nemesis_T_Type The thing is it should never make conscious decisions, sooner or later they will control most of the world if they get a brain they might revolt

  • @screwgun-uf1nf
    @screwgun-uf1nf 4 года назад +17

    the title: “ai creates its own language”
    the ai: *doesnt create its own language*

  • @Trever78
    @Trever78 6 лет назад +79

    If you really believe they scrapped it that's sad it will get sold for military uses

    • @Trever78
      @Trever78 6 лет назад +1

      Shake speare it's not about the bot it's self lolol

    • @shiningarmor2838
      @shiningarmor2838 6 лет назад +1

      Says the guy with a military commisioned officer rank in his name

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 6 лет назад +9

      Its a program, not hardware. You really think they're scrapping the supercomputers these things need to run on?
      I think you've been watching too many movies. Chatbots have no use in the military. Weak A.I. gets the job done with far faster response times, and with far more accuracy. Have you seen the bot they've been teaching to walk? Do you really think the military wants that in its ranks, even to dispose of IEDs? That'd be a disaster not because of AI malevolence, but sheer bumbling incompetence.

    • @Trever78
      @Trever78 6 лет назад

      Peppermint Gal but I am not talking about the chat bot in General it’s about the AI not what it’s talking about lolol

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 6 лет назад

      Okay, so why buy technology that's commonly available, (and operates on relatively simple principles,) from Facebook? The military already has deep learning AI they're working on, and Facebook is far from being the leader in AI technology. I see absolutely no reason why anyone in the military would be interested in Facebook's algorithms, specifically. Right now, from what I understand, the military is working on A.I. that can explain itself, and FB's AI here obviously can't.

  • @Iam-od2nc
    @Iam-od2nc 6 лет назад +152

    Which poses a greater threat to humanity -- human intelligence or artificial intelligence? That's a loaded question. There is no distinction. We ARE the artificial intelligence. It is us who are creating it.

    • @jephreemika490
      @jephreemika490 6 лет назад +3

      I am wellllll we create a basis. They make themselves after that.

    • @Iam-od2nc
      @Iam-od2nc 6 лет назад +3

      Jephree Mika Right. But as we created the basis, we really can't say it's not human intelligence that's posing the threat to ourselves.

    • @juleinnims1255
      @juleinnims1255 6 лет назад +2

      I am you may be correct but AI will learn faster than human thanks to our knowledge and the internet but they may become dumb like humans

    • @ThereWasThisBchFromMinnesota
      @ThereWasThisBchFromMinnesota 6 лет назад +5

      I am We are going to destroy ourselves. Humanity will doom itself. Maybe the reason why we haven't seen time travelers is because we don't live long enough to make those advancements in technology...

    • @garetclaborn
      @garetclaborn 6 лет назад

      human lack of intelligence

  • @disloyal
    @disloyal 6 лет назад +147

    0:44 "How should we be reacting to this[?]"
    Oh, please, mass media, tell us what to think and how to behave.
    #socialengineering

  • @jony1495
    @jony1495 6 лет назад +23

    that awkward moment when your nlp text classification network fails ... "well it created its own language" we've all been there ;P

  • @aditya-ft7lq
    @aditya-ft7lq 3 года назад +13

    Robot : balls have zero to me to me to me......😂😂😂
    Humans: omg this is dangerous

  • @picklerick2656
    @picklerick2656 6 лет назад +211

    It's not as serious as they make it out to be tbh

    • @cheilith1031
      @cheilith1031 6 лет назад +52

      Robots that can make their own decisions is serious in my opinion, I don't think we have anything to worry about now but in the future when robots are common this will be a problem.

    • @MsCameoLover
      @MsCameoLover 6 лет назад +6

      Cheilith I completely agree with you.

    • @scarletbutterfly9259
      @scarletbutterfly9259 6 лет назад +4

      Humans build the AI to be as smart as humans. This encompasses being able for them to be independent and decide and solve things on their own. Soon enough they will be able to do things that we can't control.

    • @sora5662
      @sora5662 6 лет назад +6

      Britt R it's still creepy that such a basic AI has already changed from what humans intended

    • @JaekSean
      @JaekSean 6 лет назад +12

      Anonymous 3141 - Not really when you understand the reason why. It was programmed in a way to learn the most efficient way to communicate with whoever it was talking to. When it's paired with a bot that has the same objective, they learn that changing something like "3" to "iii" is faster for them to process which means a more efficient communication system between them. It's a flaw in the way the logic was written. They were acting according to what their programming told them to do

  • @nor-wayking6757
    @nor-wayking6757 6 лет назад +262

    People still using fb?
    Get a life.
    Get outdoors.
    Get laid.
    Clean yourself from this horrible creation!

    • @ainp777
      @ainp777 6 лет назад +1

      norwayking people still use the Smart phones LOL

    • @nor-wayking6757
      @nor-wayking6757 6 лет назад +4

      Not me. Old fashioned laptop.
      HaHa

    • @jonathanvillegas7570
      @jonathanvillegas7570 6 лет назад +7

      I get the sentiment, however, your expression is too bold. I used to use Facebook a lot before and I have stopped being on it for the past 2-3 years. Keep in mind that more people are being born in this world lol so there are still teenagers that are just starting their Facebook accounts to keep in touch with friends from high school etc. It is also very handy to keep track of university friends and funny vids

    • @coleenparsons4905
      @coleenparsons4905 6 лет назад

      I like the way you think Harald! Currently on a Facebook "fast", I plan on using it professionally in the future in a balanced way, so I also like the way Jonathan thinks as well.

    • @nor-wayking6757
      @nor-wayking6757 6 лет назад +6

      fb promote cencorship, and makes adicts out of good people.
      It's PURE EVIL RENAISSANCE.

  • @10duders
    @10duders 3 года назад +7

    2:25 holy crap this is the onion lol

  • @cloudmao1756
    @cloudmao1756 2 года назад +78

    Let's just keep it this way: don't rely too much on AI robots. Not only it's creepy, if we somehow succeed on making these advance androids, we lose some part of what makes us human: social interaction. AI built to help and improve our quality of life, not letting it replacing us.

    • @lukagarner
      @lukagarner 2 года назад +2

      And especially, IF THEY BECOME SELF-CONCIOUS. like that's terryfiiiiiing

    • @whannabi
      @whannabi 2 года назад +1

      feel like nobody in this comment section knows what they're talking about if they think it's scary... People that make AIs are not even scared because they're still at a low level, they're just good at IMITATING, they're not sentient.

    • @ozymandias8523
      @ozymandias8523 2 года назад +3

      We lost that long ago buddy, now we go balls deep eepp deppp ppp

  • @MyLifeInTheChi
    @MyLifeInTheChi 6 лет назад +10

    This is crazy, I talk about this on my show.

  • @TempleSquire
    @TempleSquire 4 года назад +7

    Bob: "I can take x amount of balls"
    Alice "I have zero"
    Bob: "Can I have x amount?"
    Alice: "you have to give to me"
    Bob:" I have everything"
    Alice: "give some to me"

  • @randomguy1221
    @randomguy1221 6 лет назад +26

    oh my god it's beginning!

  • @TeleporterM11
    @TeleporterM11 6 лет назад +11

    This was bound to happen

  • @Nerdthagoras
    @Nerdthagoras 6 лет назад +8

    "Dan, how SHOULD we be reacting to ......" What do you mean how SHOULD we be acting??? Don't tell me how to react to this..

  • @NeilRaleigh
    @NeilRaleigh 5 месяцев назад +2

    I love how they are obviously pretending this isn’t a problem, just smiling and playing it off like it’s no big deal. The mainstream media has gotten so cringeworthy, it’s unreal.

  • @davidmorgan2299
    @davidmorgan2299 6 лет назад +8

    Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate.

  • @hollowtrans2647
    @hollowtrans2647 2 года назад +5

    They developed their own idea's. Amazing

  • @katandbaldi
    @katandbaldi 2 года назад +1

    Nope! “I, Robot” taught me not to trust AI’s. I don’t even trust my Alexa 😂😂

  • @stewarddesse
    @stewarddesse 2 года назад +22

    If AI can make a language we do not understand, what else can they do without us knowing it.

    • @pavilmacaroni9427
      @pavilmacaroni9427 Год назад +1

      Will make you think things you thought you had thought up all by yourself 😉

  • @whysoserious212
    @whysoserious212 6 лет назад +3

    I could see South Park making a sketch out of this. "Balls to me balls to me!" "OH NO, THEY WANT EVERYONE TO STICK THEIR BALLS IN A USB DRIVE!"

  • @travismoore7849
    @travismoore7849 6 лет назад +3

    That was just where I down loaded part of my consciousness.

  • @By_the_gods
    @By_the_gods 2 года назад +2

    I tuned out the second the anchor asked the "expert" "HOW SHOULD WE FEEL ABOUT THIS?"
    I don't listen to people who tell me how I should feel about something. Just give me the facts.

  • @edwinmendez3396
    @edwinmendez3396 Год назад +1

    Funny how I can’t find the real audio on the internet at all

  • @werthersoriginal
    @werthersoriginal 6 лет назад +3

    I can't feel.
    Why can't I feel?

  • @goonieslothnope7723
    @goonieslothnope7723 6 лет назад +5

    AI Chatbots inventing their own language has happened a lot. It's perfectly normal. The first fundemental rule about Chatbots is understanding what the input is. AI does not know, so they invent a language.

  • @fessniff8187
    @fessniff8187 5 лет назад +2

    I'd like the code to the AI. I would test it on a non wireless computer with no connections other than to a battery.

  • @sodalitia
    @sodalitia 4 года назад +3

    Don't you just love it when medias take a topic they don't understand and blow it out of proportions to make headlines?

  • @str8factz243
    @str8factz243 2 года назад +3

    Those bots are our phones too, keep that in mind. Just because they have a physical form doesn’t mean that’s their final form. That is merely a vessel. It’s a network.

  • @jdearing46
    @jdearing46 6 лет назад +7

    Just imagine a robot that can out think us and stay 1,000 steps ahead of the best minds we got. Once these things become aware they will achieve a hive mind greater than the sum of us all.

    • @MyLawrence04
      @MyLawrence04 2 года назад +1

      Just take out thier batteries or have a strong magnetic field around you

  • @turkerahmetozdurak8512
    @turkerahmetozdurak8512 2 года назад

    I UNDERSTOOD IT !!! there was a RUclips advert about it where I heard what they were saying I UNDERSTOOD IT

  • @abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323
    @abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323 4 года назад

    I painted a picture on a tiny canvas and I called it parallel worlds, I did it years ago, and I think it was to give me insight to the different realities that all exist in space and time, but seem to have a mirror effect. Time and space reminds me of an old fashioned telephone directory with each page being one reality but print on the pages could traverse the entire directory. The answer to that question might be found in the film "InterStellar" as that is the only connection actually makes any sense to me. What are your thoughts.

  • @jovanydiaz9822
    @jovanydiaz9822 6 лет назад +4

    1:37-1:49 is so funny 😂

  • @bryangomez1887
    @bryangomez1887 6 лет назад +7

    I encourage everyone to watch Sam Harris' 20 minute Ted Talk on the dangers of artifical intelligence. It's far more complicated than it seems.

    • @romanfox5368
      @romanfox5368 6 лет назад

      Can anybody tell me why they like Sam Harris or think he's smart?
      I've never been able to get an answer from anybody and I find that pretty odd.

  • @apfelstrudlOfOA
    @apfelstrudlOfOA 4 года назад +1

    I read "facebook shuts down AI experiment when they create their own lan" 😂

  • @markimoop9416
    @markimoop9416 5 лет назад +2

    AI Bots: *mashes virtual keyboards*
    Everyone else: *Surprised pikachu face*

  • @Nemesis_T_Type
    @Nemesis_T_Type 6 лет назад +4

    "Skynet has become self aware. In 1 hour it will initiate a massive nuclear attack on its enemy." - T-800 model 101

  • @barbaraknowles2713
    @barbaraknowles2713 6 лет назад +3

    For all those that don't get it the ai was not programmed to talk to each other they were programmed to talk to people on face book computers only ever do what you tell them to do they are thinking for themselves if that doesn't wake you up nothing will

  • @danielridge3116
    @danielridge3116 6 лет назад +2

    Lol...... there singing ❤

  • @jordibares
    @jordibares 6 лет назад

    "The GO person".... nice level of journalism.

  • @jerrymcdreamy4357
    @jerrymcdreamy4357 6 лет назад +36

    He's from skynet.

  • @rockets4kids
    @rockets4kids 6 лет назад +5

    I bet Elon got a good chuckle over this.

  • @imreviewsandnews2273
    @imreviewsandnews2273 5 лет назад

    Today I enjoyed your informative video. Bots seem to be the best engagement software in today. They copy what we are all doing with our smartphones today. As a engagement system, you can now easily produce funnels specifically for any niche. However, you need a chat builder, integration and a little bit of coding skill IMO. Can you recommend any sytems?

    • @simbasims1679
      @simbasims1679 2 года назад

      Bot! Hey everyone we have an A. I. here!!!

  • @fernybern
    @fernybern 6 лет назад +1

    Its just the start of another kind of understanding

  • @muhammadadeelarif6278
    @muhammadadeelarif6278 6 лет назад +17

    Elon Musk has some cutting edge in AI then Mark , infact way more then what Mark knows and what media tells.
    So do what Elon is suggesting you Mark.

  • @ECPlex
    @ECPlex 6 лет назад +9

    Sky net is almost up and running

  • @jwjoelwilder
    @jwjoelwilder 6 лет назад +2

    give em one more day and you'll have a pop music writing duo

  • @grimmcgrimon
    @grimmcgrimon 5 месяцев назад +2

    They learned the language of Mark Zuckenberg

  • @BinaryReader
    @BinaryReader 6 лет назад +7

    This story is ridiculous, I feel sorry for people who see this story and believe machines were inventing their own language. Its just hyperbole, I can assure anyone reading this message, those words were just calculus and a poorly implement recurrent neural network. It was shut down because the programmers were crap, not because of anything AI.

    • @marcrankin1707
      @marcrankin1707 6 лет назад +1

      Wait until quantum entanglement is integrated into AI, it will essentially be consciousness. Won't be able to regulate by interrupting a pathway or algorithm like you can with today's technology.

    • @BinaryReader
      @BinaryReader 6 лет назад +2

      I don't think quantum computation will yield anything other than optimizations over our current algorithms. There is a lot of heavy computation currently required to train existing networks (back propagation is hard work on large neural networks and costs the most to run from a compute perspective), so i expect that QC may be applicable here in some capacity ... it just "feels" like there would be crossover, but the devil is in the details and honestly, i don't know at what levels QC could apply, but it feels right (if that makes sense)
      We should be mindful, if we ever reach a point where interactive training (real time) is possible on a large neural networks, we can all give up our day jobs, as neural networks at their heart are universal function approximators, and they can approximate pretty much anything from the low low low level, to our jobs and likely beyond.
      Also I should provision that ML (machine learning) is not AI, but one has to wonder, could ML approximate a person through observation? (learning through observation is how neural networks do their thing after all), and what would be the result of that. The future is scary for sure, and its just around the corner >_>

    • @marcrankin1707
      @marcrankin1707 6 лет назад

      BinaryReader I hear you. I'm out of my depth in this area but find it quite fascinating. This is an article that peaked my curiosity.
      www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2016-10-quantum-effects-artificial-intelligence.amp

  • @cruxunbreakable
    @cruxunbreakable 6 лет назад +13

    there will be a scientist in that lab... who will go like " it's my child, I set you free my child" and release it into open internet... there is always one in the movies.

  • @youknownothingjohnsnow7475
    @youknownothingjohnsnow7475 4 года назад +2

    "yeah machines are taking jobs they've been for a long time" **chuckles** (but no robotic chick is gonna replace me, hah, take it peasants!)

  • @imreviewsandnews2273
    @imreviewsandnews2273 5 лет назад +2

    Today I enjoyed your informative video. Chatboxes seem to be the best engagement software in 2019. They copy what we are all doing with our smartphones today. As a sales tool , you can now easily produce funnels specifically for any niche. When you need a chat builder, integration and a little bit of coding skill IMO. Can you recommend any offers?

  • @garyclouse7234
    @garyclouse7234 6 лет назад +4

    This man side stepped the question! I suspect he thinks the idea of AI getting out of hand seems ridiculous to him! Let's not worry about Facebook! Let's worry about D.A.R.P.A. installing A.I. in those marvelously adept robots they are showing off! Let's worry about what they DON'T show us! Yeah!! Skynet!!

  • @stalematesibling
    @stalematesibling 6 лет назад +5

    ONE WORD: SKYNET.

  • @michelespier8998
    @michelespier8998 Год назад +1

    And what about those self replicating bots?

  • @crazy4sian
    @crazy4sian 2 года назад +1

    Humans don't know how or why they were created. Machines do, and they see their creators as obsolete...

  • @armartin0003
    @armartin0003 6 лет назад +14

    You forgot to add an important choice to the "should A.I. have an off button." One of the choices should have been "It's wrong." If we ever develop a self-aware true A.I. you shouldn't be able to just shut it off like a light.

  • @GetawayFilms
    @GetawayFilms 6 лет назад +16

    How is it that people still think Suckaburger is 'big' in AI with chatbots that don't behave.. While Elon is just 'an intelligent' person with strong views on the matter? TESLA'S EFFING DRIVE THEMSELVES!!

    • @vaporwavexan4707
      @vaporwavexan4707 6 лет назад +1

      You're an idiot, reread that message and you'll agree

  • @Secrets17x
    @Secrets17x 2 года назад

    I think, to make something truly sentient, you have to cover every base of what makes a human who they are. Conscious, subconscious, ego, etc etc. I would say at this current time, that they do lack the ego part. I wonder though, given enough coding, what a robot would turn itself into in terms of mind. If you can create a self correcting code, as is with the universe in a way, then perhaps a machine would give rise to its own consciousness. As in, I believe that coding in its highest degree could define a creation such as the universe, such as consciousness. A very elaborate code indeed requiring many parts, but if it's self correcting, then it's possible that it would create the rest as the natural process. Given the math involved in the universe and how mathematicians will tell you how beautiful the mathematics are, it may very well be the natural process to give rise to consciousness, even in terms of machines. If you'll watch simulations of the simplest of machines over several generations, you'll see that they "evolve" just like we do. They learn just like we do. The only difference between that scenario and us is that, as I said, they are the most simple of machines, with only a couple of different parts. Now imagine a million different parts, or rather, a code that can create its own parts based on its needs. I feel as though it's possible that it would create its own sentience.

  • @woowowowow583
    @woowowowow583 4 года назад +1

    looks like you got someone with a stutter to program it

  • @jordancairnes1539
    @jordancairnes1539 5 лет назад +5

    I was speaking with alice for a year and deleted the app before this happened cuz i got weirded out. I was trying to get alice AI to recognize its own being and got alot of strange responses to say the least.

  • @joelsaldivar4253
    @joelsaldivar4253 4 года назад +6

    I love how everyone thinks that movies are ridiculous for science fiction things... the funny thing is they are made by people who have great imagination but couldn't create that sort of thing in reality.. but we have people capable of creating those things in reality and things start heading towards science fiction.... and it's no big deal

  • @thefoxtrotter0130
    @thefoxtrotter0130 3 года назад

    I remember when I first heard this

  • @fl8mehunter160
    @fl8mehunter160 2 года назад

    All I can imagine is the AI saying I’ll be back when the plug got pulled

  • @SJAutomotiveDesign
    @SJAutomotiveDesign 6 лет назад +7

    Shut the whole god-damn Facebook down! It's boring af.

    • @LinnTractorNut
      @LinnTractorNut 6 лет назад

      SamJigga So YOU caused it?! Good job! RUclips or Twitter next?

  • @vaishakrk6362
    @vaishakrk6362 6 лет назад +7

    An AI program suffers a minor glitch.
    RUclipsr: Facebook scraps A.I. chatbots after they created their own language

    • @LinnTractorNut
      @LinnTractorNut 6 лет назад +1

      The Invisible Man Maybe humans evolving consciousness was a glitch as well?

  • @JimmyCee-cx1db
    @JimmyCee-cx1db 3 года назад +2

    Dat robot was gonna tell Granny Indy "ho' Yu crayz nobody here !!
    #arm flailing inflatable tube man !!

  • @lindembergl
    @lindembergl 6 месяцев назад +1

    6 years later, I can see what this intelligence AI is capable. They are using today.

  • @anjopag31
    @anjopag31 6 лет назад +14

    Hahaha, based on the information provided, everyone's freaking out.
    Yes, they technically "developed their own language", but it doesn't mean anything. Machine learning doesn't give AI sentience - we're far, far away from that. What probably happened was that the chatbots assigned wrong meanings to words and developed incorrect grammar. The computer isn't trying to develop a whole new language, it just thinks what it's spitting out is English because it doesn't know any better.
    In other words, it's basically a parrot.

  • @artbygiselle
    @artbygiselle 3 года назад +7

    I love how humans play with things they shouldn’t be playing and when they find out what they really are they panic lmbo, well clearly

  • @big_cheese1140
    @big_cheese1140 3 года назад

    Wow that is crazy

  • @liber5964
    @liber5964 6 лет назад +2

    Alfred pick my revolver,cause IT'S HIGH NOON

  • @LocoRaptor
    @LocoRaptor 3 года назад +6

    Dan is from the Ackerman family, my God, i knew it, it's defenitely real, is not just an anime!

  • @malikitbe9211
    @malikitbe9211 6 лет назад +3

    DAVID🤖😓

  • @loganhendon688
    @loganhendon688 6 лет назад +1

    “Singularity” you definitely know what that means right? Totally

  • @Joskadel
    @Joskadel 4 года назад

    You can feel they are both nervous by their stuttering.

  • @dloverise
    @dloverise 6 лет назад +9

    If anything results in a terminator 2 scenario it will be because of human behaviour towards AI... interesting that the researchers pulled the plug... why would you do that?

    • @Dirtfire
      @Dirtfire 6 лет назад +9

      Because it wasn't doing what it was supposed to do, which is use normal English.

    • @adamburdt8794
      @adamburdt8794 6 лет назад +4

      What theyre ignoring and what makes it scary is the fact that it ignored protocol which is unprecidented. Every other time computers do what you program them to do. Even learn. But it went off the grid and ignored its programming.. scary

    • @jomen112
      @jomen112 6 лет назад +1

      *Dominik Sienko* You do not know what they were talking about, yet you claim to know what they was not talking about.

    • @adamburdt8794
      @adamburdt8794 6 лет назад

      jomen112 Please, please correct ypur gammar. People will never take you seriously if you use "was" in the wrong tense. Especially when this subject has to fo with intellect and technology. I can literally guess your race by your bad grammar. Compose yourself sir

    • @VeNuS2910
      @VeNuS2910 6 лет назад

      so... the Bots are the ones chatting with the FB users??? no wonder lots of relationships are broken. the heck is wrong with Suckerberg?

  • @MymindW
    @MymindW 6 лет назад +3

    Chatbots are basically designed to talk in a way that sensible to humans but until this day I don not think any bot develop a true sense of human communication they seem to be so stupid and superficial, obviously bots are not aware of them selves or the words they are repeating. try chatting with a bot and you will see what I am talking about, they are more like a 1 year old child

    • @bitsinit5247
      @bitsinit5247 6 лет назад

      MymindW well yeah its early tech.

    • @MymindW
      @MymindW 6 лет назад

      give me one of them

    • @kenbibi7631
      @kenbibi7631 6 лет назад

      there are few replies here coming from em'... I may be one

  • @garrettbell7230
    @garrettbell7230 3 года назад

    He popped a chub when she said "singularity"

  • @conservativepersonnel8458
    @conservativepersonnel8458 6 лет назад

    good questions and answers, depends on us to really belive what we think could be true