IONQ Stock Takes Charge in Quantum Computing for 2025

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 янв 2025

Комментарии • 36

  • @MrSweetBeaks
    @MrSweetBeaks 16 дней назад

    Would like more coverage on OPTT, I think you were the person that talked about it and made me aware of how solid of a company it is. Appreciate that made decent gains

  • @stefanie4849
    @stefanie4849 16 дней назад

    What about rr?

  • @thephantomthrifter2120
    @thephantomthrifter2120 16 дней назад

    It’s about sentiment and projected revenues , I have been doing this since early 90s I can tell you Cisco at one point was trading for over 1,000 a share , Qualcomm was 3,000 $ yes that’s right early 90s was crazy , well don’t fight the crowd or momentum , even NVDA use to be basically a gaming stock until AI came about well what happened ? Exactly I’m all in on Ionq since 8$ a share and everyone was hating on them !

  • @lica948
    @lica948 17 дней назад

    CERENCE ,can you cover it?

  • @ryannatan9160
    @ryannatan9160 17 дней назад +2

    Will can you analyse poet technology please thank you so much,,,

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      Got you, Ryan! POET Technologies is on my radar now. I’ll dig into it and see what makes it tick-stay tuned, brotha! 🙌

  • @williamhenry7
    @williamhenry7 17 дней назад

    What do you think as far as robotic stocks like MBOT, and SERV?

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад +1

      I'll be putting together some videos on robotics plays soon :) Robotic stocks are heating up

  • @venkarol
    @venkarol 17 дней назад

    What is your take on QBTS?

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      Just made a vid on it recently!

  • @wesstone9976
    @wesstone9976 17 дней назад

    Will Rgti vs IonQ who do you like better? Thanks

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      Personally I'm a bit biased being more invested in Rigetti.

  • @balav94
    @balav94 17 дней назад

    Can you cover QBTS and ARQQ?

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      QBTS and ARQQ are worth a deeper dive for sure. I’ll look into them and might cover in an upcoming video. Stay tuned, brotha! 👊

    • @balav94
      @balav94 17 дней назад

      @ Thanks Will, looking forward to it! 👊

  • @justinrobinson6796
    @justinrobinson6796 17 дней назад

    New subscriber here.. love the detailed videos. I would love to see an analysis on archer and joby, or evtols in general. Sorry in advance if you have done so recently.

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад +1

      You got it! and no we haven't touched those yet!

    • @justinrobinson6796
      @justinrobinson6796 17 дней назад

      @WillRichYT new to personal investing and you're the first youtuber I've subscribed to. Much appreciated and looking forward to watching more of your videos!!

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад +1

      Means a lot. Thank you for the trust and subscribing!

  • @JobyJenkins
    @JobyJenkins 17 дней назад

    LAES , supposedly leads in encryption security technology vulnerabilities of quantum computing

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      Interesting mention, joby! Encryption tech in quantum is a game-changer. I’ll keep LAES on my radar-thanks for sharing! 🔒

    • @JobyJenkins
      @JobyJenkins 17 дней назад

      @ please share your thoughts if you have time to check it out. I’m interested in taking a small gamble early if it looks good. Love small cap potential.

  • @joephillips6917
    @joephillips6917 17 дней назад +1

    General Dynamics, not GE. They are like peas in a pod with the DoD.

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      ou’re right, Joe-General Dynamics and DoD are super tight. Defense contracts could be a major growth driver there. Solid insight!

  • @schries
    @schries 16 дней назад

    STEM inc

  • @Motik367
    @Motik367 17 дней назад +1

    QSI

    • @WillRichYT
      @WillRichYT  17 дней назад

      ’ll keep tabs on it-good mention, Motik! 🚀

  • @EpicStrategies578
    @EpicStrategies578 17 дней назад

    28 looks like a good entry. I'll wait.

  • @persianfoo
    @persianfoo 17 дней назад +1

    Their revenue is not growing fast enough to justify their current valuation. 916 times their quarterly revenue which is beyond insane. 275 P/S, unreal valuation based purely on hype and speculation. Will take 5-10 years plus minimum if this ever gets its revenue to match its current market cap