Sir plz make detail notes on Muslim law. you made a effort to make as much as easier to understand and only few topics plz cover all the topics it's very useful I thankful to you sir
No he cant sell the property without the knowledge of the board, if he is allowed to sell the property in the Waqfnama then only he can sell or else he can't
Wakf Act 1995, Has many provisions, section 52 & 53 which can declare anyone has encroached Muslim land donated to Allah & under these sections can order the person to leave with the help of DM SSP, Can that be done by Non Muslims? Do they have these privileges? There are limitations for Hindu deities to knock the doors of Court, it is having limitations with time, whereas WAKF board has no time limitations according to section 108, Is this not the violation of human rights & Equality in connection to various faiths? According to section 89 one has to send a notice to WAKF board before filing a case, it is just like parallel Government. Have you ever heard of sending notice to before filing a case? According to my knowledge it happens if a person is filing a case against Government. Section 4 & 5 WAKF Act, according to this there will be a survey of land that will be done on timely basis, whose expenses are to be bore by tax payers of India. 1991 worship Act, which is also non secular, In continuation, If there are any issues faced by Churches, Temples, Gurudwara it has register a complaint with Police, Whereas WAKF can order the police if there are any discrepancy according to the board & police has to abide by it. Is this true with Non Muslims? respective cases, introspect. WAKF Act, section 40 gives the power to the board in connection to declaration of any of the property as its own. Can a normal citizen do this? Here please correct me if I'm wrong with authentic sources. If there are legal issues faced by Non Muslims then they are suppose to fight in WAKF tribunal which is run by Sharia Kaanoon can they ever get Justice? I don't know, if true please enlighten me with the verdicts so given. So WAKF tribunal is an authority, hence in future if a person gets a verdict from it in favour of him/her & can challenge the opposing verdict given in the same case given by Supreme Court of India, till date it has not been done, but what is the guarantee that it is not done in future? Think. Keeping all these powers in hand, WAKF board is asking the petitioners of Mathura & Kaashi Temple that they should not fight it in Civil court but in Sharia Court A.K.A WAKF board. This is the outcome of the powers so given to the WAKF board. It also has provision of public servant in section 101. All these information so put here are according to the best of my knowledge sources, anybody is free to correct me with authentic sources. If WAKF notifies any property, there is a direct judgement from the Supreme Court 1979 2 SCC Page 468, Para 34,Case: Board of Muslim WAKF vs Radhakishan, Supreme Court holds, if there exists a dispute of property as to whether the property belongs to WAKF or not which is prior to 2013 amendment of WAKF, then WAKF act will not be applicable if the other party is a Non Muslim or Government. Thankyou
Your vedios are very clear and easy to understand, Please upload the video for muslim Law of inheritance and succession sir .
Thank you sir for such a sincere effort
Sir....iam grateful to you for each and every lecture on your playlist.... please make lecture on succession under Muslim law...plsss Sir 🙏🏻🙏🏻
¹
Sir, Excellent presentation. You make the concepts simple and clear. Thank you so much !
I appreciate your knowledge and also your way of teaching, thanks plz
Thanks Hari Meena ☺️👍
Done dear guest... Subscribed😍😍nice sir very useful 😍😍
Thank u so much sir ur videos were very helpful for to learn 🙏✨
Thank you sir very useful
Good video... Very useful
Sir u r the reason for clearing all my subjects in one attempt thank you so much.... That's a great teaching 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Thank you ☺️👍
Nice to see you sir with your son
Thank you so much.. very useful🙏
sir i have one dout the spelling of waqf is correct ah because in my book it is wakf pls tell me which one is correct sir
Sir plz make detail notes on Muslim law. you made a effort to make as much as easier to understand and only few topics plz cover all the topics it's very useful I thankful to you sir
Will attempt few more topics 👍
@@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll plz sir all the topics of Muslim law plz
Thank you soo much sirr ❤❤
Thank u so much sir 🙏
Nice presentation
Awesome
Sir it’s Abdul qavi Khan
Sir vehicle donated as a waqf is registered under whose name?
Not really sure
@@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll its a request if u can provide me the ans for this ques.
Can it be waqf board?
Will try
Sir please make video about different form of talaq
Will try sometime
Please do Hiba and Shuffa, Sir.
Thank you.
Super sir
Sir can we get these ppt for study purpose?!
Sorry. As of now, I am not sharing them as still work is in progress on them
Can the mutawalli sell the properties without the knowledge of Wakf? is he sold multiple properties , can wakf revoke those properties?
No he cant sell the property without the knowledge of the board, if he is allowed to sell the property in the Waqfnama then only he can sell or else he can't
Are you from?
Karnataka
Sir, your video is very useful for me. Can you please send this PPT this mail or upload in description.
Thank you so much sir
That boy is very cute and beautiful
Please sir share the ppt as well
Sorry as of now
#DissolveWaqfBoard
PLEASE EXPLAIN MUSLIM LAW IN TELUGU
Naku Telugu radu ☺️
Wakf Act 1995,
Has many provisions, section 52 & 53 which can declare anyone has encroached Muslim land donated to Allah & under these sections can order the person to leave with the help of DM SSP, Can that be done by Non Muslims? Do they have these privileges?
There are limitations for Hindu deities to knock the doors of Court, it is having limitations with time, whereas WAKF board has no time limitations according to section 108, Is this not the violation of human rights & Equality in connection to various faiths?
According to section 89 one has to send a notice to WAKF board before filing a case, it is just like parallel Government. Have you ever heard of sending notice to before filing a case? According to my knowledge it happens if a person is filing a case against Government.
Section 4 & 5 WAKF Act, according to this there will be a survey of land that will be done on timely basis, whose expenses are to be bore by tax payers of India.
1991 worship Act, which is also non secular,
In continuation, If there are any issues faced by Churches, Temples, Gurudwara it has register a complaint with Police, Whereas WAKF can order the police if there are any discrepancy according to the board & police has to abide by it. Is this true with Non Muslims? respective cases, introspect.
WAKF Act, section 40 gives the power to the board in connection to declaration of any of the property as its own. Can a normal citizen do this? Here please correct me if I'm wrong with authentic sources.
If there are legal issues faced by Non Muslims then they are suppose to fight in WAKF tribunal which is run by Sharia Kaanoon can they ever get Justice? I don't know, if true please enlighten me with the verdicts so given. So WAKF tribunal is an authority, hence in future if a person gets a verdict from it in favour of him/her & can challenge the opposing verdict given in the same case given by Supreme Court of India, till date it has not been done, but what is the guarantee that it is not done in future? Think.
Keeping all these powers in hand, WAKF board is asking the petitioners of Mathura & Kaashi Temple that they should not fight it in Civil court but in Sharia Court A.K.A WAKF board. This is the outcome of the powers so given to the WAKF board.
It also has provision of public servant in section 101.
All these information so put here are according to the best of my knowledge sources, anybody is free to correct me with authentic sources.
If WAKF notifies any property, there is a direct judgement from the Supreme Court 1979 2 SCC Page 468, Para 34,Case: Board of Muslim WAKF vs Radhakishan, Supreme Court holds, if there exists a dispute of property as to whether the property belongs to WAKF or not which is prior to 2013 amendment of WAKF, then WAKF act will not be applicable if the other party is a Non Muslim or Government.
Thankyou
pls.convey to Bengali.Form Bangladesh.
Don't know Bengali Language 😃😄
Excellent explanation
Thank you ☺️
Please convey to Tamil
I don't know Tamil :-(
Hindi achi h apki
Thank you so much sir