Andrew Jackson was the first political leader of significant power who came from humble beginnings. Up until his time, most politicians came from the aristocracy or rose to power because they ceased it as a war Lord, or came from nobility. President Jackson was also the first political leader to genuinely care about the struggles of the common working man and enacted policies to help embetter the lives of the common folk. As a fellow Tennessean, I’m proud to say that President Andrew Jackson remains in the top ten greatest American Presidents. Anyone else agree?
Lying about what? You must be referring to the the ACTUAL revisionist , intellectually dishonest 1619 Project. You SJW are virtue signalling, intellectually feeble and dishonest ideologues and nothing more. Try again.
@@albertbecerra kicked off the Civil War by doing so as well. So we can thank Lee for that. If John Brown hadn't been hung by the "Traitor Crew" we wouldn't have had the support of the Northern Free Landers to go on and crack Dixie head.
@J E what do you mean thank lee for that? All he did was carried out an order. He did not personally execute john brown, that was the law makers fault at the time for making a Marty out of John brown.
I am shocked that this video actually included, though not naming, the Cherokee Nations Supreme Court battles. There were actually two: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832). The historical context is that Georgia was looking westward to settle more land suitable for plantations. The Cherokee Nation, that had built a government emulating the US, took the matter to the Supreme Court. The first case (1831), ruled that the Cherokee Nation was not recognized as a foreign nation and could, therefore, not submit a case to the Supreme Court. However, upon review in Worcester v. Georgia, the Court recognized the Cherokee Nation as a separate foreign entity, and ruled Georgia's laws imposed on the Cherokee Nation to be unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall argued, "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territory in which the laws of Georgia can have no force." The conclusion of the case being that intercourse between the US and other foreign entities must take place within the confines of US law. However, the Indian Removal Act had been passed two years earlier in 1830. Congress voted 28-19, the House of Representatives voted 102-97, Jackson signed the act into law on May 28, 1830. The Cherokee Nation, being part of a few to resist the law, did everything right. They won their case, but still lost everything. The irony being that the US has always prided itself on independence and fighting for freedom. Jackson too, being a proponent of such ideas. But the same sentiments don't apply to those who can be labeled as "other."
Congrats on showing your ignorance. First off the Indian Removal was a treaty negotiation. One of the most prominent was the Treaty of Echota in 1835 with the Cherokee. It had LITERALLY NOTHING to do with Jackson and the Indian Removal Act. The rulings you cite stated that STATE governments could not regulate commerce or laws within the Indian territories. The reason being that states do not do international negotiations. That is the FEDERAL government's job. Second, what Jackson did was the same thing Washington and Jefferson did. They sat with native leaders, negotiated treaties, paid them for the land and gave them new land. The treaty of Echota was negotiated between Jackson and tribal councilman Major Ridge. Ridge and his alliance known as the "Ridge Party" supported the move to Oklahoma. However there was opposition lead by council chief John Ross. Nevertheless Jackson negotiated a price for the land and what territories out west would be compensated. This was no different than Jefferson buying Louisiana or Seward buying Alaska. Cherokee v Georgia and Worcester literally have NOTHING to do with the Indian Removal Act. The state of Georgia in Worcester required white residents to receive a license to live on Cherokee land which was declared unconstitutional. Please explain how that relates to the president negotiating the purchase of land willingly by Native leaders? You going to say Washington and Jefferson were wrong for doing the exact same thing?
@@ImperiumMagistrate So the Indians and white Americans _negotiated_ forced removal of the Indians and imperialism against them? Yup, that definitely makes sense! I guess Hitler and the Jews negotiated the Holocaust, right?
What do you think happens to the Cherokee if they weren't removed? You think the state of GA just gives up their push for more land and ignores the discovery of gold on Cherokee territory? Everyone holds hands and lives in wondrous peace.
Although President Jackson is the last veteran of The Revolutionary War and he called himself a Jeffersonian, President Jefferson called him: “a dangerous man”.
Yes. Of course Jefferson died in July 1826, on the same day that John Quincy Adams' father John died, and over two years after the office of POTUS had been stolen from Jackson. They had been watching the growth of Jackson's personality cult over the last few years of their lives, and could see nothing good coming from it. Incidentally, the real reason the 1824 presidential election ended up being decided in the House was not because no candidate had won a majority of the popular vote; rather it was because no candidate had won a majority of the electoral college vote. Such inaccuracies bother me.
As soon as he made that comment, I was like - Oh, really? No matter what, no one can really say Trump was boring or uninteresting. If he gets a reaction from you, any kind; that's enough to prove that point.
Jackson proved to be correct in his distrust of the federal banking system. Especially given the incredible financial mess we're in today. $32 trillion in debt , continuing to print more and more currency and borrow borrow borrow
President Andrewc Jackson,is one of my favorite who occupied the office of the Presidency,during his time,the U.S. was able to pay it's debt,and the only time in U.S. history that the nation had no debt at all.
Nah he was mid The only good things he did was assimilating the Indians and removing the central bank Everything else he did was bad because he was a Democrat
Interesting that Jackson was correct in asserting that states could not nullify laws they disagree with and had the courage to stand up to them. If there were more like him the entire sanctuary issue would have died years ago. It was left untreated and metastasized.
He was right about the banks, although it took awhile to get worked out. Our current system of Federal Reserve banks is closer to Jackson’s thinking than the 2nd Bank of the United States was. He deserves his place on the $20 bill for his contribution to banking reform.
He was a fool, he owned slaves and look at what he did to the Native Americans. I am African American, European American, German American, and Native American, I hate that he did that.
And you are mire of a fool for perpetuating the myth that Indisn trubes and black African tribes never participated in their own forms of slavery. Hell, how about the FACT that Muslims enslaved white eatern European Christians? What about the FACT that Indian tribes encroached on land previously occupied by other tribes? The Dakota Sioux did NOT just peacefully settle the Dakota territory. What about the FACT that labor and sex slavery, on a per capita basis, occurs at the HIGHEST rate of economic output in...AFRICA? How about those facts..."brotha?"
@Johnpolitis... If I am interpreting your comment correctly, you are absolutely correct in pointing out the hypocricy espoused by the non-critical analysis and woke parrotting of these revisionist SJW. For example, Nigerians have expressed views of racial superiority toward American inner city blacks. That is an inconvenient FACT often ignored by sociologists and ethnographers, alike. Specifically, some members of traditional Nigerian village comminities viewed American inner city blacks as dirty and intellectually inferior in comparison to their own Nigerian, natavist ethicnic lineage. Those are inconvenient FACTS with which their revisionist whitewashing is exposed for the intellectusl dishonesty by which they justify their attempts for superimposing systemic indocrination.
Wow. Loads of stuff in there I never knew about Jackson. All I really know is his history fighting the national bank which I have always admired. I recommend "the money masters" for anyone who hasn't seen it.
Andrew Jackson helping us win our second war of independence against the English is the only thing I, as a history nut, will give him praise for. Everything else, he was one of the absolute worst presidents we had
@@aidanphillips6760 how he treated his slaves, his elimination of dissent, trail of tears, it even stated examples in a couple videos prageru has done on Jackson AND in our history books. Read about him. He was one of the most evil Democrats in the party's history and there were alot of bad ones
@@JMolKoz20791 he treated his slaves like family like most masters; the reason for his dissent was because he eliminated the reason for south carolina to secede; he was a man of much honour; there was no trail of tears that's a white liberal lie - it was instead for the benefit of a backwards race (the red indians); he is the only president to get rid of debt; he got rid of the fat cats in the bank; he saved america many times; he was a man of the people; he was virtuous; he was a christian through and through; he came from nothing; etc i suggest reading in defense of andrew jackson. by the way pragerU is run a by a apartheid supporting jew so that doesn't mean anything to me
I like this video. Jackson was an absolute Chad in many respects. They did miss the part where he became the first and only president to pay off the national debt, which prageru forgot to mention. That was one of he greatest victories in his time as president. Also I think they just kind of make it like he was more into politics than being a war hero, which isn't necessarily true. In fact it quiet the opposite, because he is more famous for being in the military and being a war hero than a president. Him becoming president is like Washington, he only did it because his country wanted him to.
That's why Jackson was a jackass who was the American Hitler. Andrew Jackson was the Hitler of his time! Jacksonian Genocide. Jackson was a mass murderer.
The only indians he killed were tribes who sided with enemy armies like the British, and indians who killed innocent people. Other than that, this didn't stop jackson from adopting an american indian child.
WRONG! Andrew Jackson was not a mass murderer! In fact, Jackson is the reason that the Native Americans exist today. Most American politicians and military leaders at that time wanted to literally kill every native American. Jackson said no to that. You’re ignorance of history is astounding
I love how one of the largest and most overt acts of genocide against Indians in American history is reduced to a footnote at the end of the video. Classic PragerU.
I would hardly call it a footnote--- it was a substantial part of the video. And most of the time, people remember the beginning and the end of a video, so what are you complaining about?
Fun fact: The cherokee tribe owned black slaves. Make me wonder who suffered the most during the trail, the indians or their slaves. Fun fact: 2 The cherokee tribe turned the path their of the trail of tears into a bicycle path now.
Yeah, and the democrat party really has become a bunch of jackasses. If old hickory was alive today I bet he would go brutal and really express how disapointed on what his party has become.
@@christopherlawrence6353 Yes. I'm sure he would. However I feel like you're acting like that's a positive... Because he's be furious at how inclusive the Dems have become, and start ranting about all this race mixing
It is not because of the closing of the bank that the panic of 1837 happened, but because he made it into law that federal land can only be bought by gold or silver.
Agreed, summary: "expanded" voting > bloody kansas created a new party > ended era of good feelings trail of tears > created issues for settlers and the indians coexsting with the US all would lead to the civil war the only good thing you could say he did is that he briefly ended the federal bank, he never made it a amendment though so it came right back 5 minutes after he was out.
well, today it would better more useful to say "pragerU the hell with you" cos god isn't democratic. god will burn you alive for disagreeing. not just send you to the reservation.
I mean although the March was logistically terribly planned, and it was harsh, keep in mind local citizens would just keep on continuing attacking the local Indian population, which is what started the relocation in the first place. But why don't we just give this Allen guelzo a chance and see what he says in his presentation.
@@albertbecerra I expect a whitewashed recollection with a weird emphasis on conquest without recognizing the decimated parties. Kind of like their pro Robert E Lee video.
@@albertbecerra The man sounds like a bloodthirsty lunatic, incompetent politician, and laid the groundwork for the traitors in the South to secede to uphold their fuedalistic slave state. It is all shared with a weird sense of pride.
@Kaz Miller I don't know about that, it seems Jackson was very unsupportive of secession, as what was stated in the video on how he handled South Carolina. Now I'm not denying he was a spiteful individual.
I mean Joe Biden is not a great president but he is not the worst. Joe hasn’t done anything to help the country but he hasn’t done much to ruin it, same with Trump. If you mean how they governed the nation your list would be mostly accurate minus Joe. If you take in person background of Presidents a lot of Presidents who did a great job governing the country would be lower because they owned slaves. Like Washington or Jefferson. In my opinion they were good Presidents but bad people.
@Steven Blythe I think it's close but Wilson did a lot of bad but he did win WW1 that's a bigger accomplishment than most presidents and Biden has no accomplishments only failures
If there is one thing to blame entirely; that would be the account of the British officer slashing young Andrew Jackson for not shining his shoes. No wonder Ol Hickory got his controversial personality
informed, well educated, and moderate americans don't use the term "bootlick" . the trail of patriotic relocation was necessary to remove an internal enemy that was threatening us
@@007kingifrit dude be a man lol if a little word like bootlick is gonna be an issue, I suggest you get off the internet 😂 plenty of worse terms out there. But fine, if you’re gonna be a little modern day sissy about it, I’ll use “grovel”. Feel better ? 😂😂😂 Anyway, that’s all I see here. An American president who had the right idea regarding federal banks and debt, sure. But a genocidal maniac against the Native Americans. Read on the Cherokee nation and how they did everything right in the Georgia courts and STILL were denied. Educate yourself, provide evidence. Patriotic relocation is a meaningless term here. If it was patriotic, they would have been allowed to remain within the States, instead they were pushed away with no mercy for human life. If it happened to me, my family or to you and your family, and if this was Biden or Trump committing the act today, I’m sure you would fight back, because I sure would as well. That’s what the 1A & 2A is for after all.
@@nicbahtin4774 The “Manifest Destiny” was an imperialist plan to expand America. One of the main reason the American Revolution happens was because the Americans could not pass the Appalachian Mountains because it was reserved for the natives. We took that territory after the revolution and then we furthered our territory to native lands. America is the most racist colonial empire in history. They said it was okay to have colonies as long as it was not home to white people. So they colonized Hawaii, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico. Also slavery is one of the worst parts of American history, those slaves were better off being free than being used as forced labor.
a manly man, back when we had real leadership and hope in our nation. sadly we have lived in peace and stability so long we have fallen to decadence and the comments are filled with sissies whining about a little patriotic relocation
Oh how I would love to hear you "whining" about being forced out of your home at gun point with nothing but the clothes on your back to march hundreds of miles on foot with little to no supplies. There's nothing "Patriotic" in breaking treaties, lying to allied nations, and forcing death marches on people who fought wars for you.
@@adennjusik5455 empathy fallacy: we do not use empathy to determine right and wrong. empathy is something that should be used in our personal lives but not to build public policy as it leads to feeling good, not doing good how would YOU like it if we had an enemy nation that did slavery and raiding our homes on a daily basis? gee the patriotic relocation was probably better than that
dude did good on all cept the native thing, that was really nasty. considering the times, kinda expected. still, would have preferred to see a different resolve to the situation.
i am proud of his treatment of unassimilated indians. that's how we unified the internal body of the nation. without it we would still be fighting constant wars with internal nations
@@007kingifrit i dont agree with you, i think you are wrong. if that was so, then why is that not happening to the rest of the country where they went and the others that were already where they were west of the mississippi?
@@007kingifrit The Indians weren't going to be much of a problem either way for the simple reason that they were being numerically overwhelmed. European immigration to the US was massive and continuous, feeding a larger and larger military, which the Indians would have been no match, east or west of the Mississippi, within or without reservations. Case in point, after a certain point, each Indian war was getting easier than the last one. No, the real problem was and is the descendants of the slaves. From the initial 300,000, they ballooned up to 40,000,000, later fueled by waves of legal and illegal immigration. That's the problem we're really stuck with and haven't been able to solve. Today, the left has decided to "deal" with it full crawling-style, bestowing our 13% with endless reverse discrimination and generous spending across all levels of government and even the private sector, not to mention rhetorical and cultural groveling. The right - or the center-right, at least - seems to want to go the "colorblind" route with the occasional denouncement of Jim Crow and elevation of MLK, that's when they're not embarrassingly calling Democrats "the real racists." Donald Trump wouldn't STFU for two seconds about "black unemployment" before releasing thousands of their thugs from federal prison via the _First Step Act_ Point is, Jackson should've focused more on the repartriation of whatever freedmen they had at the time than the dwindling Indians. Would've spared us a lot.
He was not a fool ,nor crazy. His views on the federal banking system were right given the economic chaos we're in today . No ,the handling of the native Indians was not good but it was a necessary evil to expand the nation. I'm alittle biased given that most of my ancestors were living in Tennessee around this time after coming over from Europe in the 17th and 18th century. A few of them were attacked by Indians and I am glad the US ecpanded
I'm done with this at bank part, Ending the central bank was his best accomplishments. To think otherwise makes you banking shill at the ready for your next bailout
Jackson should never been on there to begin with. Tubman would be better. Unfortunately what they want to do is put him on the back. He was a terrible person.
People are bringing up Andrew Jackson's mass murder of Native Americans, but not enough people are bringing up how, independent of that, he was a terrible president. He singlehandedly caused America's first major economic crisis with his actions against the Fed. A pure unforced error that took decades to recover from
@@stanleystriker7065 Historically? Yes... It is. Without it the US economy literally failed completely... The Great Depression emphasized the importance of a strong, centralized, and resilient banking system, as by that time the Fed was still decentralized and unorganized. Considering that after that we have FDIC and NCUA, yeah... Jackson's been wrong at just about every single step he took when in office.
People's President/ I doubt that many would feel this way. He put the Indians on reservations, and had slaves. Just what people did he represent? Those that had power.
Jackson was responsible for many thousands of Native American deaths June 1838 he moved 4 artillery groups that were fighting the native Seminoles in Florida to Cherokee co. NC to bombard the native Cherokees in this area Lt. John Phelps said that someday we would have to pay for treating these native people so terrible research vol. 21 Journal of Cherokee Studies
prager would bring back slavery in a trice if he could, it wasn't catholics stopped the inquisition was it. never forget prager will defend god's right to kill anyone he feels like - a great basis for christian morality eh.
No idea why you titled this video, ‘the people’s president’. Sounded to me like he didn’t give two shits about people. Slave, Native American, or otherwise.
If I had a nickel for every time PragerU made a video praising a reprehensible American figure, I’d have two nickels, which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice, right?
@@007kingifrit A few things: 1. The Trail of Tears. That’s a given 2. The Supreme Court had already ruled relocation of the Cherokee unconstitutional. He did it anyway. 3. He single-handedly created an economic crisis by abolishing the National Bank 4. He was also just a bad guy. During duels, he would fire before the countdown was complete. So in short, not only was he a racist douchebag, he was also a bad president.
@@trev6265 They literally called the video “The People’s President”. That’s positive framing right there. There are also many phrases in the video that are meant to paint him in a positive light. They also intentionally associate Jackson’s story with things conservatives love, such as limited government, rugged hard work, the belief that their opponents can only win due to corruption, complete disregard for the rule of law, the extrajudicial execution of people who defy them, and so on.
@@trev6265 There is nothing in that video that conservatives would find distasteful. In fact, they would probably support the Trail of Tears and defend the economic crisis he created if Jackson was President today.
@Derccent Jailed political opponents, suspended Habeas corpus, and shut down newspapers critical of him. The list goes on. Rageholic has a video talking about how shitty Lincon was.
@@007kingifrit Bro we stole the natives land. That’s like if I told you that you had to grab all your things and move to New Mexico or you would be imprisoned, also I am taking your kids because you are not suited to raise them.
the trail of patriotic relocation of enemy assets was a good thing, they were brutal savages who attacked us constantly. it was necessary to unify the country
no....i can safely say you're the only person in history to use that term. unelss you are referring to the trail of patriotic relocation which killed a minimum 3,000 who really deserved it
"Genocide of the indians" is nothing but a big fat leftist lie! Sure there was the "Sand Creek massacre" and all that, but no intended extermination against the indians from anyone. The indians committed more genocide against each other and toward white men.
@@007kingifrit Ok, the natives did come from Siberia…. 10,000 years ago that was when wooly mammoths were still alive. Yeah some tribes did fight each other but they didn’t genocide each other. The white Europeans were technically trespassing. America ruined the Native American Life. I like to say there is not true American other than Native Americans everyone else is living in America is European, Asian, African, or Pacific Islander.
@@johnpolitis9060 noble savage fallacy, every society does genocide. it's just only we superior people actually wrote down our history. you use a god of the gaps fallacy to assume that since you don't know their history it was ok. genocide is like breathing, everyone does it. hell the cherokee didn't free their slaves till 1890
To solve a problem you must begin at the beginning. The Pilgrims should have been fed Thanksgiving diner and then sent on their merry way! The Indians need to give back the beeds and trinkets and take back Manhattan. In reality the American Indians did pay a high price for European Migration. God bless America.
i say hell will be a cross between disneyland (for the nice folk) and the playboy mansion (for us perverts) why? well if satan rejected god and i reject god, why would satan want to torment me? he wants to torment christians, not his fellow satanists. tormenting sinners would be god's work, since when has satan wanted to do god's work?
Definitely read a Bible to help clear this up. You'll find that Satan, our mutual enemy, will also be in hell. Hell is made for him, the demons (angels who were kicked out with him), and people who will not bend the knee to King Jesus. Satan wants to torment all of God's image-bearers. We divide ourselves into myriad factions, but there are only those in Christ and those not in Christ. "Satanists" only matter to other Satanists, but Satan sees them as God's image-bearers...and therefore more humans to destroy. He likely sees them as fools, as well, since they fall for his "Satanism" ploy. Satan knows King Jesus and he knows the Scriptures. He knows his time is drawing to a close.
well, today it would better more useful to say "pragerU the hell with you" cos god isn't democratic. god will burn you alive for disagreeing. not just send you to the reservation.
@@andrzej6286 3000 dead isn't a genocide sweetie. plus it was good for our nation. being against genocide is like being against air. it is necessary for the building of a strong body
@@007kingifrit Ok, the natives did come from Siberia…. 10,000 years ago that was when wooly mammoths were still alive. Yeah some tribes did fight each other but they didn’t genocide each other. The white Europeans were technically trespassing. America ruined the Native American Life. I like to say there is not true American other than Native Americans everyone else is living in America is European, Asian, African, or Pacific Islander.
I'm sure Hell has him. Man was a gambler, had a wrathful temper, and had no qualms about shooting a man who challenged his honor. By all Christian reasoning, he's rotting in hell.
Andrew Jackson was the first political leader of significant power who came from humble beginnings. Up until his time, most politicians came from the aristocracy or rose to power because they ceased it as a war Lord, or came from nobility. President Jackson was also the first political leader to genuinely care about the struggles of the common working man and enacted policies to help embetter the lives of the common folk. As a fellow Tennessean, I’m proud to say that President Andrew Jackson remains in the top ten greatest American Presidents. Anyone else agree?
Casually says he invested in a bunch of slaves
How the hell did you comment 18 years ago
@@exbacon6225 LOL that's part of his display name.
He fulfills the adage "If you can't be clever, try at least to look clever."
Better than Jefferson, he wasn't an abolitionist. Although don't know that much about how he treated them.
@@markmaki4460Ain’t nothing clever about you Buster Brown.
This guy has a perfect voice for narration. It's so soothing.
good for lying too.
@@HarryNicNicholas what lie is in the video?
@@HarryNicNicholas name one.
Lying about what?
You must be referring to the the ACTUAL revisionist , intellectually dishonest 1619 Project.
You SJW are virtue signalling, intellectually feeble and dishonest ideologues and nothing more.
Try again.
Glad to see the trail of tears comments and informed Americans. I am a republican / independent, but I am not a Moron or racist.
They defended Robert E Lee by saying that he stopped a slave revolt lol. This channel has no shame.
@@kazmiller96 I mean technically he did
@@albertbecerra Yeah, but they told it as if it was a good thing in a video were they argued for why Lee-statues should remain.
@@albertbecerra kicked off the Civil War by doing so as well.
So we can thank Lee for that.
If John Brown hadn't been hung by the "Traitor Crew" we wouldn't have had the support of the Northern Free Landers to go on and crack Dixie head.
@J E what do you mean thank lee for that? All he did was carried out an order. He did not personally execute john brown, that was the law makers fault at the time for making a Marty out of John brown.
I am shocked that this video actually included, though not naming, the Cherokee Nations Supreme Court battles. There were actually two: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. Georgia (1832). The historical context is that Georgia was looking westward to settle more land suitable for plantations. The Cherokee Nation, that had built a government emulating the US, took the matter to the Supreme Court. The first case (1831), ruled that the Cherokee Nation was not recognized as a foreign nation and could, therefore, not submit a case to the Supreme Court. However, upon review in Worcester v. Georgia, the Court recognized the Cherokee Nation as a separate foreign entity, and ruled Georgia's laws imposed on the Cherokee Nation to be unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Marshall argued, "The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community occupying its own territory in which the laws of Georgia can have no force." The conclusion of the case being that intercourse between the US and other foreign entities must take place within the confines of US law. However, the Indian Removal Act had been passed two years earlier in 1830. Congress voted 28-19, the House of Representatives voted 102-97, Jackson signed the act into law on May 28, 1830. The Cherokee Nation, being part of a few to resist the law, did everything right. They won their case, but still lost everything. The irony being that the US has always prided itself on independence and fighting for freedom. Jackson too, being a proponent of such ideas. But the same sentiments don't apply to those who can be labeled as "other."
Amen Potato time
Congrats on showing your ignorance.
First off the Indian Removal was a treaty negotiation. One of the most prominent was the Treaty of Echota in 1835 with the Cherokee. It had LITERALLY NOTHING to do with Jackson and the Indian Removal Act. The rulings you cite stated that STATE governments could not regulate commerce or laws within the Indian territories. The reason being that states do not do international negotiations. That is the FEDERAL government's job.
Second, what Jackson did was the same thing Washington and Jefferson did. They sat with native leaders, negotiated treaties, paid them for the land and gave them new land. The treaty of Echota was negotiated between Jackson and tribal councilman Major Ridge. Ridge and his alliance known as the "Ridge Party" supported the move to Oklahoma. However there was opposition lead by council chief John Ross. Nevertheless Jackson negotiated a price for the land and what territories out west would be compensated. This was no different than Jefferson buying Louisiana or Seward buying Alaska.
Cherokee v Georgia and Worcester literally have NOTHING to do with the Indian Removal Act. The state of Georgia in Worcester required white residents to receive a license to live on Cherokee land which was declared unconstitutional. Please explain how that relates to the president negotiating the purchase of land willingly by Native leaders? You going to say Washington and Jefferson were wrong for doing the exact same thing?
@@ImperiumMagistrate Yikes.
@@ImperiumMagistrate
So the Indians and white Americans _negotiated_ forced removal of the Indians and imperialism against them? Yup, that definitely makes sense! I guess Hitler and the Jews negotiated the Holocaust, right?
What do you think happens to the Cherokee if they weren't removed? You think the state of GA just gives up their push for more land and ignores the discovery of gold on Cherokee territory? Everyone holds hands and lives in wondrous peace.
Although President Jackson is the last veteran of The Revolutionary War and he called himself a Jeffersonian, President Jefferson called him: “a dangerous man”.
Yes. Of course Jefferson died in July 1826, on the same day that John Quincy Adams' father John died, and over two years after the office of POTUS had been stolen from Jackson. They had been watching the growth of Jackson's personality cult over the last few years of their lives, and could see nothing good coming from it.
Incidentally, the real reason the 1824 presidential election ended up being decided in the House was not because no candidate had won a majority of the popular vote; rather it was because no candidate had won a majority of the electoral college vote. Such inaccuracies bother me.
@@markmaki44601.5% of Ammericans "voted" for Washington, so yeah it truly wasn't that representative.
Best quotation of a President “I killed the Bank. - Old Hickory
Should've been. I killed native Americans
His last words, I still imagine someone saying that when they close the FED.
"No American President has been more beloved and reviled than Andrew Jackson..." Trump - Hold my beer.
Trump doesn’t drink. So he’ll instead say “hold my Pepsi!”
@@redblaze8700 ah, that's right. Good call. Lol
@@resolute123 You mean alt-right.
As soon as he made that comment, I was like - Oh, really?
No matter what, no one can really say Trump was boring or uninteresting. If he gets a reaction from you, any kind; that's enough to prove that point.
If people actually read about what TR believed in republicans would despise him and progressive democrats would love him.
I like that he shrunk the gov, went against the banking system and paid off national debt
And then when he shrunk the native population, that was pretty cool
@captainsensible115 not eveyone was perfect, i can appreciate the good people do while also not liking everything bad they did.
@@1973superdad can you say the same about Hitler
@captainsensible115 you dont sound like a very fun person. Sounds miserable to go through life and find negitive in everything you see. Best of luck.
@@1973superdad he literally committed genocide bruh how can you defend him
Jackson proved to be correct in his distrust of the federal banking system. Especially given the incredible financial mess we're in today. $32 trillion in debt , continuing to print more and more currency and borrow borrow borrow
President Andrewc Jackson,is one of my favorite who occupied the office of the Presidency,during his time,the U.S. was able to pay it's debt,and the only time in U.S. history that the nation had no debt at all.
“I killed the Bank.” - Andrew Jackson 😊
@@RicardoGarcia-uw6cr exactly. Ahehe😁✌️
Nah he was mid
The only good things he did was assimilating the Indians and removing the central bank
Everything else he did was bad because he was a Democrat
Interesting that Jackson was correct in asserting that states could not nullify laws they disagree with and had the courage to stand up to them. If there were more like him the entire sanctuary issue would have died years ago. It was left untreated and metastasized.
Real Americans love Andrew Jackson!!
He was right about the banks, although it took awhile to get worked out. Our current system of Federal Reserve banks is closer to Jackson’s thinking than the 2nd Bank of the United States was. He deserves his place on the $20 bill for his contribution to banking reform.
You flippantly dismissed Jackson's decision on a national bank as "wrong", but it was absolutely right, despite that depression.
I greatly appreciate the neutrality and truthfulness of this video. This is especially impressive for Jackson as the topic.
Indeed!
My public school taught me that he was a fool.
Glad to see a new take.
He was a fool, he owned slaves and look at what he did to the Native Americans. I am African American, European American, German American, and Native American, I hate that he did that.
And you are mire of a fool for perpetuating the myth that Indisn trubes and black African tribes never participated in their own forms of slavery.
Hell, how about the FACT that Muslims enslaved white eatern European Christians?
What about the FACT that Indian tribes encroached on land previously occupied by other tribes?
The Dakota Sioux did NOT just peacefully settle the Dakota territory.
What about the FACT that labor and sex slavery, on a per capita basis, occurs at the HIGHEST rate of economic output in...AFRICA?
How about those facts..."brotha?"
@@VeniVidiVici456 But racism was nonexistent there while the Whites had racism mixed with slavery.
@Johnpolitis...
If I am interpreting your comment correctly, you are absolutely correct in pointing out the hypocricy espoused by the non-critical analysis and woke parrotting of these revisionist SJW.
For example, Nigerians have expressed views of racial superiority toward American inner city blacks. That is an inconvenient FACT often ignored by sociologists and ethnographers, alike. Specifically, some members of traditional Nigerian village comminities viewed American inner city blacks as dirty and intellectually inferior in comparison to their own Nigerian, natavist ethicnic lineage.
Those are inconvenient FACTS with which their revisionist whitewashing is exposed for the intellectusl dishonesty by which they justify their attempts for superimposing systemic indocrination.
@@buggypssmith1785 nothing you just described is foolish though?
This is supposed to make him look good?
Obviously not.
Can some help me understand PU's logic? They simp Jackson (a democrat) while simultaneously claiming the party switch never happened...
Wow. Loads of stuff in there I never knew about Jackson. All I really know is his history fighting the national bank which I have always admired. I recommend "the money masters" for anyone who hasn't seen it.
Indian Genocide was not mentioned
Andrew Jackson helping us win our second war of independence against the English is the only thing I, as a history nut, will give him praise for. Everything else, he was one of the absolute worst presidents we had
How was he bad?
@@aidanphillips6760 how he treated his slaves, his elimination of dissent, trail of tears, it even stated examples in a couple videos prageru has done on Jackson AND in our history books. Read about him. He was one of the most evil Democrats in the party's history and there were alot of bad ones
@@JMolKoz20791 he treated his slaves like family like most masters; the reason for his dissent was because he eliminated the reason for south carolina to secede; he was a man of much honour; there was no trail of tears that's a white liberal lie - it was instead for the benefit of a backwards race (the red indians); he is the only president to get rid of debt; he got rid of the fat cats in the bank; he saved america many times; he was a man of the people; he was virtuous; he was a christian through and through; he came from nothing; etc i suggest reading in defense of andrew jackson. by the way pragerU is run a by a apartheid supporting jew so that doesn't mean anything to me
@@JMolKoz20791he got national debt to zero, he fixed the economy, he gave the U.S. more land, gave the states more rights, etc.
I like this video. Jackson was an absolute Chad in many respects. They did miss the part where he became the first and only president to pay off the national debt, which prageru forgot to mention. That was one of he greatest victories in his time as president. Also I think they just kind of make it like he was more into politics than being a war hero, which isn't necessarily true. In fact it quiet the opposite, because he is more famous for being in the military and being a war hero than a president. Him becoming president is like Washington, he only did it because his country wanted him to.
Jackson also killed an early version of the Fed.
Yes... Caught that did you? Do you expect Prager to agree with Jackson's aversion to the Jewish (Rothschild) banks? Of course not
@@Origen17 Because Praeger is a Zionist front organization for AIPAC and ADL.
Jackson was a genocider.
And he is responsible for trail of tears
He had an interesting up bringing
Joe once dueled Andrew and won
Is that when he took him behind the bleachers ?
Doesn’t sound like the best President. But I appreciate the history
Jackson, the first Democrat president
Yeah and PragerU is painting him in a good light, ironic. Also the parties ideologies have changed over time.
Also if he was alive today he would be a republican
@@MasonRaithe Republicans haven't changed. You must be a fool
Back when Democrats were actually GOOD. Totally unlike today where they need to be tried for treason and be given the death penalty.
ROTFL
Unless you were Native American people.
Awww...well. I guess every mass murderer is also someone's hero...
That's why Jackson was a jackass who was the American Hitler. Andrew Jackson was the Hitler of his time! Jacksonian Genocide. Jackson was a mass murderer.
He negotiated the treaties with the natives
Jackson literally praised the Native Americans and fought along side them
The only indians he killed were tribes who sided with enemy armies like the British, and indians who killed innocent people. Other than that, this didn't stop jackson from adopting an american indian child.
WRONG! Andrew Jackson was not a mass murderer! In fact, Jackson is the reason that the Native Americans exist today. Most American politicians and military leaders at that time wanted to literally kill every native American. Jackson said no to that. You’re ignorance of history is astounding
I love how one of the largest and most overt acts of genocide against Indians in American history is reduced to a footnote at the end of the video. Classic PragerU.
I would hardly call it a footnote--- it was a substantial part of the video. And most of the time, people remember the beginning and the end of a video, so what are you complaining about?
That's not all they got wrong.
@@nrgentertainmentAre you a snaking-the-facts jew?
5:12
That wasn’t genocide.
Thank you for that very informative and no-biased-at-all video. I guess there are all sorts of “conservatives” in PragerU.
Ask the Cherokees how their little "walk" was, that he opened the door for.
You obviously are talking out of the side of your mouth and knew nothing about history
Fun fact: The cherokee tribe owned black slaves. Make me wonder who suffered the most during the trail, the indians or their slaves. Fun fact: 2 The cherokee tribe turned the path their of the trail of tears into a bicycle path now.
They agreed to it
@@ImperiumMagistrate hahahaha I love people that say $hit like this. It makes me realize I am not the only idiot in the world.
@@kinjunranger140 what was the treaty of Echota?
Bro, Andrew Jackson was the reason the democrats have a donky as a logo since he was a jack ass. And don't forget Trail of Tears.
He was a terrible human being.
And yet Trump's favorite POTUS.
Go figure.
Really bro what do you know about the trail of tears please elucidate you know only what you’ve been told by the globalist bankers
Exactly
Yeah, and the democrat party really has become a bunch of jackasses. If old hickory was alive today I bet he would go brutal and really express how disapointed on what his party has become.
@@christopherlawrence6353 Yes.
I'm sure he would.
However I feel like you're acting like that's a positive... Because he's be furious at how inclusive the Dems have become, and start ranting about all this race mixing
Trail of tears !
so? it was necessary to remove an internal enemy
@@007kingifritit's 2023 and you still think that
@@HazelCat09 what's wrong with purging an internal enemy? its necessary for the security of any state
@@007kingifrit we essessentially kicked them out of what had been their territory for thousands of years.
@@HazelCat09 and they did the same before they had it. the cycle goes on. land cannot be owned, only won or lost
It is not because of the closing of the bank that the panic of 1837 happened, but because he made it into law that federal land can only be bought by gold or silver.
Trail of Tears. To hell with Andrew Jackson.
Agreed,
summary:
"expanded" voting > bloody kansas
created a new party > ended era of good feelings
trail of tears > created issues for settlers and the indians coexsting with the US
all would lead to the civil war
the only good thing you could say he did is that he briefly ended the federal bank,
he never made it a amendment though so it came right back 5 minutes after he was out.
Agreed.
@Edgeward Nope. Not even in name.
well, today it would better more useful to say "pragerU the hell with you" cos god isn't democratic. god will burn you alive for disagreeing. not just send you to the reservation.
Agreed
Which people? The ones forcibly displaced from their homes and sent on a death march?
I mean although the March was logistically terribly planned, and it was harsh, keep in mind local citizens would just keep on continuing attacking the local Indian population, which is what started the relocation in the first place. But why don't we just give this Allen guelzo a chance and see what he says in his presentation.
@@albertbecerra I expect a whitewashed recollection with a weird emphasis on conquest without recognizing the decimated parties. Kind of like their pro Robert E Lee video.
@Kaz Miller well I just watched it, that was pretty good.
@@albertbecerra The man sounds like a bloodthirsty lunatic, incompetent politician, and laid the groundwork for the traitors in the South to secede to uphold their fuedalistic slave state. It is all shared with a weird sense of pride.
@Kaz Miller I don't know about that, it seems Jackson was very unsupportive of secession, as what was stated in the video on how he handled South Carolina. Now I'm not denying he was a spiteful individual.
🤔❓ aside from his strong personality, I still can't understand what his positive contribution was... but, it is what it is
You did see the part about handing the British their asses, right? It was an overwhelming success, even though the Americans eventually fell back.
@@HomelessOnline
🔄 Wrong, I highly Respect that move...., but again, aside from that, I still question it...
He's dyeing words"I killed the bank!"
He was for the people and not for the rich people
He paid off our national debt! The only president to achieve it!
Top 3 worst presidents #1 Joe Biden #2 Woodrow Wilson #3 Andrew Jackson
Biden is too recent. We won’t know the full effect of his administration until years later.
I mean Joe Biden is not a great president but he is not the worst. Joe hasn’t done anything to help the country but he hasn’t done much to ruin it, same with Trump. If you mean how they governed the nation your list would be mostly accurate minus Joe. If you take in person background of Presidents a lot of Presidents who did a great job governing the country would be lower because they owned slaves. Like Washington or Jefferson. In my opinion they were good Presidents but bad people.
I'd make Biden number 3. Wilson by far was the worst.
@Steven Blythe I think it's close but Wilson did a lot of bad but he did win WW1 that's a bigger accomplishment than most presidents and Biden has no accomplishments only failures
If there is one thing to blame entirely; that would be the account of the British officer slashing young Andrew Jackson for not shining his shoes. No wonder Ol Hickory got his controversial personality
Trail of tears, end of story. I’m an informed, educated, and moderate American. This channel bootlicks beyond belief.
informed, well educated, and moderate americans don't use the term "bootlick" . the trail of patriotic relocation was necessary to remove an internal enemy that was threatening us
@@007kingifrit you're just a rat protecting its perceived self interests
@@007kingifrit dude be a man lol if a little word like bootlick is gonna be an issue, I suggest you get off the internet 😂 plenty of worse terms out there. But fine, if you’re gonna be a little modern day sissy about it, I’ll use “grovel”. Feel better ? 😂😂😂
Anyway, that’s all I see here. An American president who had the right idea regarding federal banks and debt, sure. But a genocidal maniac against the Native Americans. Read on the Cherokee nation and how they did everything right in the Georgia courts and STILL were denied.
Educate yourself, provide evidence. Patriotic relocation is a meaningless term here. If it was patriotic, they would have been allowed to remain within the States, instead they were pushed away with no mercy for human life. If it happened to me, my family or to you and your family, and if this was Biden or Trump committing the act today, I’m sure you would fight back, because I sure would as well. That’s what the 1A & 2A is for after all.
@@007kingifrit 😂😂
@@007kingifrit LOL
damn what GigaChad of a President
trail of tears
“Invested in slaves”
@@MasonRai
and here i thought manifest destiny is only for the white man, good thing the Indians got their own
@@MasonRai
well that's good he is a job creator also
@@nicbahtin4774 The “Manifest Destiny” was an imperialist plan to expand America. One of the main reason the American Revolution happens was because the Americans could not pass the Appalachian Mountains because it was reserved for the natives. We took that territory after the revolution and then we furthered our territory to native lands. America is the most racist colonial empire in history. They said it was okay to have colonies as long as it was not home to white people. So they colonized Hawaii, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico. Also slavery is one of the worst parts of American history, those slaves were better off being free than being used as forced labor.
Why no mention of when and how he paid off the national debt in 1835?
a manly man, back when we had real leadership and hope in our nation. sadly we have lived in peace and stability so long we have fallen to decadence and the comments are filled with sissies whining about a little patriotic relocation
Oh how I would love to hear you "whining" about being forced out of your home at gun point with nothing but the clothes on your back to march hundreds of miles on foot with little to no supplies. There's nothing "Patriotic" in breaking treaties, lying to allied nations, and forcing death marches on people who fought wars for you.
@@adennjusik5455 empathy fallacy: we do not use empathy to determine right and wrong. empathy is something that should be used in our personal lives but not to build public policy as it leads to feeling good, not doing good
how would YOU like it if we had an enemy nation that did slavery and raiding our homes on a daily basis? gee the patriotic relocation was probably better than that
so you would support hitler
@@007kingifrit so genocide is considered manly man.
@@rajashashankgutta4334 sometimes, name a single civilization not built on genocide? oh right....none.
Wonder how soon this video will be taken down like the Robert E Lee video?
They made sure to prop up the fed and dismiss it as a mistake, and mentioned how terribly he treated the Indians. Plenty of cover to keep it up
I hope they take it down too.
It’s kind of ironic that my real name is Andrew Jackson and tomorrow is my birthday
Andrew Jackson his face on the $20 dollar bill 💵 great president
*Straight, poor white mens’ president
that was the majority
dude did good on all cept the native thing, that was really nasty. considering the times, kinda expected. still, would have preferred to see a different resolve to the situation.
i am proud of his treatment of unassimilated indians. that's how we unified the internal body of the nation. without it we would still be fighting constant wars with internal nations
@@007kingifrit i dont agree with you, i think you are wrong. if that was so, then why is that not happening to the rest of the country where they went and the others that were already where they were west of the mississippi?
@@007kingifrit The Indians weren't going to be much of a problem either way for the simple reason that they were being numerically overwhelmed. European immigration to the US was massive and continuous, feeding a larger and larger military, which the Indians would have been no match, east or west of the Mississippi, within or without reservations. Case in point, after a certain point, each Indian war was getting easier than the last one.
No, the real problem was and is the descendants of the slaves. From the initial 300,000, they ballooned up to 40,000,000, later fueled by waves of legal and illegal immigration. That's the problem we're really stuck with and haven't been able to solve.
Today, the left has decided to "deal" with it full crawling-style, bestowing our 13% with endless reverse discrimination and generous spending across all levels of government and even the private sector, not to mention rhetorical and cultural groveling. The right - or the center-right, at least - seems to want to go the "colorblind" route with the occasional denouncement of Jim Crow and elevation of MLK, that's when they're not embarrassingly calling Democrats "the real racists." Donald Trump wouldn't STFU for two seconds about "black unemployment" before releasing thousands of their thugs from federal prison via the _First Step Act_
Point is, Jackson should've focused more on the repartriation of whatever freedmen they had at the time than the dwindling Indians. Would've spared us a lot.
He was not a fool ,nor crazy. His views on the federal banking system were right given the economic chaos we're in today .
No ,the handling of the native Indians was not good but it was a necessary evil to expand the nation.
I'm alittle biased given that most of my ancestors were living in Tennessee around this time after coming over from Europe in the 17th and 18th century. A few of them were attacked by Indians and I am glad the US ecpanded
@@tomster7574 what do you mean we did the same thing everywhere
What happened to his father?
JACKSON was also the originator of the Democrat Party, among other founding members.
Explains why he's that bad
Trail of tears though
I'm done with this at bank part, Ending the central bank was his best accomplishments. To think otherwise makes you banking shill at the ready for your next bailout
Still pisses me off when they talk about replacing jackson with Harriet tubman on the twenty dollar bill. Leave things alone!!
Jackson should never been on there to begin with. Tubman would be better. Unfortunately what they want to do is put him on the back. He was a terrible person.
I'd rather have Harriet Tubman than the man who invented the stupid Democratic party
The hell? Is this a pro or anti Jackson video?
Is this supposed to make me like the guy?
People are bringing up Andrew Jackson's mass murder of Native Americans, but not enough people are bringing up how, independent of that, he was a terrible president. He singlehandedly caused America's first major economic crisis with his actions against the Fed. A pure unforced error that took decades to recover from
And Trump's favorite POTUS... Wonder why 🤔
The economy is so much better with the private Federal Reserve running all the money. :)
@Stanley Striker If you look at literally any developed economy on planet Earth you can see how it's superior to the alternative
well, nice to know where your priorities lie, may want to delete and rephrase that.
@@stanleystriker7065 Historically? Yes... It is.
Without it the US economy literally failed completely...
The Great Depression emphasized the importance of a strong, centralized, and resilient banking system, as by that time the Fed was still decentralized and unorganized.
Considering that after that we have FDIC and NCUA, yeah... Jackson's been wrong at just about every single step he took when in office.
People's President/ I doubt that many would feel this way. He put the Indians on reservations, and had slaves. Just what people did he represent? Those that had power.
Long Live Andrew Jackson.
Very well done!
Jackson was responsible for many thousands of Native American deaths June 1838 he moved 4 artillery groups that were fighting the native Seminoles in Florida to Cherokee co. NC to bombard the native Cherokees in this area Lt. John Phelps said that someday we would have to pay for treating these native people so terrible research vol. 21 Journal of Cherokee Studies
Missouri didnt susced.
4:50 RIP Michigan
He was a true dictator.
Like Adolf Hitler was. Both Jackson who was a jackass and Hitler were both evil dictators! One killed Indians and the other killed Jews!
he was in no way a dictator he was elected and left when he was supposed to
I like that the fact he owned slaves and threatened to hang the men in his regimen who were disorderly is considered a plus in this video.
Yes he did own slaves. But he did stop the import of slaves from Africa.
prager would bring back slavery in a trice if he could, it wasn't catholics stopped the inquisition was it. never forget prager will defend god's right to kill anyone he feels like - a great basis for christian morality eh.
@@spartin001full No that would be Thomas Jefferson
J E please tell me you’re being sarcastic
So did Washington, Jefferson, Madison and Monroe what is your point?
I'm shocked that PragerU did aknowledge the Indian Removal genocide...
Prageru did no such thing. "Genocide of the indians" is a false narrative created by Marxist revisionists.
No idea why you titled this video, ‘the people’s president’. Sounded to me like he didn’t give two shits about people. Slave, Native American, or otherwise.
Veto power is amazing.
a notoriously hard wood ;)
Horrible Protestant
I totally disagree!! the state's do have the right to separate themselves from the federal government!!! And form their own Union
lets start towing them out to sea then.
@@HarryNicNicholas their location is not relevant to the argument?
They do not have that right by law, sorry, you're wrong
And to own human beings etc. Etc......
If I had a nickel for every time PragerU made a video praising a reprehensible American figure, I’d have two nickels, which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice, right?
whats wrong with jackson?
@@007kingifrit A few things:
1. The Trail of Tears. That’s a given
2. The Supreme Court had already ruled relocation of the Cherokee unconstitutional. He did it anyway.
3. He single-handedly created an economic crisis by abolishing the National Bank
4. He was also just a bad guy. During duels, he would fire before the countdown was complete.
So in short, not only was he a racist douchebag, he was also a bad president.
I don’t think they were trying to praise him. Just give a survey around 5 minutes. Good, bad, and ugly. We can’t view history so black and white.
@@trev6265 They literally called the video “The People’s President”. That’s positive framing right there. There are also many phrases in the video that are meant to paint him in a positive light.
They also intentionally associate Jackson’s story with things conservatives love, such as limited government, rugged hard work, the belief that their opponents can only win due to corruption, complete disregard for the rule of law, the extrajudicial execution of people who defy them, and so on.
@@trev6265 There is nothing in that video that conservatives would find distasteful. In fact, they would probably support the Trail of Tears and defend the economic crisis he created if Jackson was President today.
Him Washington and Polk 🇺🇸
Short brother 70
Strong leaders sometimes make mistakes But that is better than a week leader who leads not at all
Congratulations 👏 on your 890th milestone and Andrew Jackson IS BLACK 🖤 Blessings and Hugs 💖💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕💕!
no he wasn't?
Jackson was #2 in the run of mediocre presidents that didn't end until Lincoln was elected.
Lincoln was a piece of shit too. In fact he was the biggest POS till Woodrow Wilson.
@@gummywurms226 why?
@Derccent Jailed political opponents, suspended Habeas corpus, and shut down newspapers critical of him. The list goes on. Rageholic has a video talking about how shitty Lincon was.
@@gummywurms226 shitty, huh. Name me another president who had to deal with what Lincoln had to deal with.
@@gummywurms226 Freed the slaves
🤨
Andrew "Jackass" Jackson should be removed from the twenty dollar bill.
Seriously folks we aware of that they left out the trail of tears but this video only covers part of what he did.
Idk man the Trail of Tears seems like a pretty big thing to omit. That’s like leaving the Civil War out of Lincoln’s presidency.
It's in the video
i don't care anyways. i'm glad we did it
@@007kingifrit Bro we stole the natives land. That’s like if I told you that you had to grab all your things and move to New Mexico or you would be imprisoned, also I am taking your kids because you are not suited to raise them.
I've always hated Jackson, the man out of all things was the one who started manifest destiny.
fast beaver 53
Fast test 23
Pure baby 23
Blah, blah, blah... Trail of Tears is all I need to know about him... Everything else can only be judged by his maker at this point...
yeah
the trail of patriotic relocation of enemy assets was a good thing, they were brutal savages who attacked us constantly. it was necessary to unify the country
@@007kingifrit They weren’t savages. They only attacked when them or their land was threatened. And it wasn’t a good thing
@@MasonRai Wrong! They were savages! The indians attacked the settlers first not vice versa.
Wow... Such ignorant liars who talk out of their asses!
68th, 21 February 2023
Jacksonian Genocide ring a bell?
no....i can safely say you're the only person in history to use that term. unelss you are referring to the trail of patriotic relocation which killed a minimum 3,000 who really deserved it
"Genocide of the indians" is nothing but a big fat leftist lie! Sure there was the "Sand Creek massacre" and all that, but no intended extermination against the indians from anyone. The indians committed more genocide against each other and toward white men.
@@christopherlawrence6353 American Indians committed a genocide on white people? When and where did this happen?
@@007kingifrit Ok, the natives did come from Siberia…. 10,000 years ago that was when wooly mammoths were still alive. Yeah some tribes did fight each other but they didn’t genocide each other. The white Europeans were technically trespassing. America ruined the Native American Life. I like to say there is not true American other than Native Americans everyone else is living in America is European, Asian, African, or Pacific Islander.
@@johnpolitis9060 noble savage fallacy, every society does genocide. it's just only we superior people actually wrote down our history.
you use a god of the gaps fallacy to assume that since you don't know their history it was ok. genocide is like breathing, everyone does it.
hell the cherokee didn't free their slaves till 1890
Bernie 2.0!
To solve a problem you must begin at the beginning. The Pilgrims should have been fed Thanksgiving diner and then sent on their merry way! The Indians need to give back the beeds and trinkets and take back Manhattan. In reality the American Indians did pay a high price for European Migration. God bless America.
You don't know anything about Thanksgiving. Plus the settlers were peaceful, the indians attacked them. And FYI the indians were savage.
@@christopherlawrence6353wow, it's 2023 and you still think that
i say hell will be a cross between disneyland (for the nice folk) and the
playboy mansion (for us perverts) why? well if satan rejected god and i reject
god, why would satan want to torment me? he wants to torment christians, not
his fellow satanists. tormenting sinners would be god's work, since when has
satan wanted to do god's work?
Definitely read a Bible to help clear this up. You'll find that Satan, our mutual enemy, will also be in hell. Hell is made for him, the demons (angels who were kicked out with him), and people who will not bend the knee to King Jesus. Satan wants to torment all of God's image-bearers. We divide ourselves into myriad factions, but there are only those in Christ and those not in Christ. "Satanists" only matter to other Satanists, but Satan sees them as God's image-bearers...and therefore more humans to destroy. He likely sees them as fools, as well, since they fall for his "Satanism" ploy. Satan knows King Jesus and he knows the Scriptures. He knows his time is drawing to a close.
Not the best president to be on a $20 bill.
Prager Jew
I'm just here to see men crying in the comments about a man who was greater than they will ever be! Go drink some soy latte!
Because they don't like genocide? Lol
well, today it would better more useful to say "pragerU the hell with you" cos god isn't democratic. god will burn you alive for disagreeing. not just send you to the reservation.
@@andrzej6286 3000 dead isn't a genocide sweetie. plus it was good for our nation. being against genocide is like being against air. it is necessary for the building of a strong body
@@007kingifrit Ok, the natives did come from Siberia…. 10,000 years ago that was when wooly mammoths were still alive. Yeah some tribes did fight each other but they didn’t genocide each other. The white Europeans were technically trespassing. America ruined the Native American Life. I like to say there is not true American other than Native Americans everyone else is living in America is European, Asian, African, or Pacific Islander.
@@johnpolitis9060 stop double posting i already defeated this dumb comment
Lmaoooooo
🌹⚡️🧬💎💓 0:42
Trail of Tears. To hell with Andrew Jackson.
I'm sure Hell has him. Man was a gambler, had a wrathful temper, and had no qualms about shooting a man who challenged his honor.
By all Christian reasoning, he's rotting in hell.
Hell yeah my boy!
@@JE-zl6uy Agreed!
@@MasonRai Agreed!
So a hard travel from a treaty the Natives negotiated with makes him evil?
Trail of Tears. To hell with Andrew Jackson.
well, tiday it would better more useful to say "pragerU the hell with you" cos god isn't democratic.
@@HarryNicNicholas Agreed!
Andrew Jackson was terrible
he did the right thing, they were savages.
@@MasonRai Agreed! Jackson was an Indian Killer!