Security Controls, Types and Application - CompTIA Security+ Performance Based Question
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- Security+ self-paced course: cyberkrafttrai...
Security+ Bootcamp: cyberkrafttrai...
Discounted Security+ Exam Voucher: cyberkrafttrai...
Sign up for our Security+ Complete Self-Paced Course to study for and ace the exam on your own schedule: cyberkrafttrai...
For 10% off your enrollment use discount code: RUclipsSP
The Cyberkraft Security+ Bootcamp will fully prepare you to ace the Security+ exam with 40 hours of live training with our CompTIA certified instructors:
cyberkrafttrai...
Ace your exam and earn an average yearly salary of $85,000.
Save $200 off of your enrollment with discount code: RUclips
Our bootcamp includes:
• 40 hours of live instruction over five days of instruction
• Exam fee included ($381 value)
• Expert instruction in all five domains
• Access to the Official CompTIA Security+ Learn and Labs Environment with PBQs, Labs, a digital textbook, and more
• Over 1000 pages of PDF study guides
• 12 practice tests and 6 simulation exams (500+ total questions) to fully prepare you for test day
• High definition video lessons accessible online or through the Cyberkraft App (included)
• Weekly study sessions and live support
• Lifetime access to all future course updates
• Second Shot Guarantee - If you don’t pass the first attempt, we will pay for your second exam
Sign up for our free video training on how to register and take the exam online: cyberkrafttrai...
Download our free ports and protocols reference sheet: cyberkrafttrai...
Cyberkraft is a CompTIA Authorized Partner.
Questions? E-mail: [info@cyberkrafttraining.com]
Passed my Sec+ yesterday! Recommend that everyone watches all these PBQ video's! Thanks CyberKraft!
agreed that is why I failed the first time
Passed Sec+ the PBQs were helpful and somewhat similar to the test. Just a tip for the exam find PBQs related to the objective like given a scenario install/configure/implement. Focus in the basics since the exam is time constrained.
Congratulations!
Just wanted to say thanks for your videos! I used them while preparing for my Security+ test and I passed on my first try today!
Congratulations! Which exam did you take 601 or 701?
@@IhvJoY259 I took 601
Thanks for actually having good videos bro. Some people out there going through these questions are a net negative to study. They go over them with their flawed logic, making you question yourself. Then in the end they were wrong and you were right and you've now learnt something wrong you have to forget. Awful
Respect king
Creating an AUP is managerial not operational; the CREATION of the policy has nothing to do with daily operational activities since it's overarching for a company. If it was to enforce/implement an EXISTING AUP as the solution, that would be a different story for it to be operational. I think that scenario 2 has been overlooked causing unnecessary confusion. For both 601 & 701 versions.
Indeed. I agree 100% with you. CertMaster is known to be terrible and low quality, with outright wrong answers.
Just passed my exam and these videos were amazing! Thank you so much for your support in helping others succeed.
For the Last question.Physical and Managerial are in the the same class. *CATEGORY*.Why did physical control pass as *TYPE*
Just passed yesterday with a 790! Your videos help so much thank you!!!!
For question 2, I think the category should be managerial, since it's coming up with a policy. I would also argue it's a corrective type since the CEO is essentially 'patching' the policy
And question 3, in the 701 CompTIA official study guide, physical control is a category, and it should be a prevention type
Just recently passed my Sec+ test and wanted to give some thanks to you because your pbq videos were so useful. I actually barely passed and honestly think your videos were the reason I did so thank you so much!
I really enjoy the way you break down the questions AND answers!
Just passed the Sec+ a couple hours ago. Watched every PBQ video you posted, and it helped a lot to reason out and pinpoint a lot of the keywords on the exam. Thanks for the help!
Congratulations on passing your exam!
This is awesome! I literally just tried this one on the site. Operational was also confusing to me until now. Going through your self pace course and it's very helpful.
Confusing... Based on the exam objectives Physical is a control category and not control type??
Same. With DION, 'Physical' is listed as a category and not type, maybe they changed that around for 701, not sure though
Thanks so much! Used your videos in combination of Professor Messor, Dion tests and other youtube question videos to pass 601!
Just passed sec+, thank you for providing such great and informative content. I truly believe your pbq walk-throughs helped enormously.
Congratulations on passing!
Passed my Security+ recently! Thank you for all your help, I definitely felt like I crushed the PBQ's thanks to your videos! Appreciate all that you do and wish you all the best :)
Congratulations!
passed yesterday. Your PBQ question guides helped a lot. Thanks 💪
Physical controls is listed as a control category and not a control type in the resources I've used to study.. I get why it was the answer but there's a decent amount of confusion and inconsistency there
Thank god for this, i was completely lost on some of the other PBQ’s lol. Have you done videos for all of the PBQ’s?
Thanks for explaining Opertaional!!!
Thanks for sharing.
Thank you for your effort. In the third scenario, shouldn't the Control Type be Preventive instead of physical? Because Physical was not mentioned as one of the control types such as directive, preventive , etc .
Agreed, why the heck the Control type is physical in 3rd scenario?
Based on comptia sec+ 701 Guide book:
Control Categories are:
Technical
Managerial
Operational
Physical
And Control types are:
Preventive
Deterrent
Detective
Corrective
Compensating
Directive
can someone enlighten me?
Oh my bad this sample is for sy 601
I agree. And also, how is a keycard a managerial control? It seems technical or operational to me.
Thank you
Huh, I thought "yet" in question 2 signaled a compensating control. Like "we SHOULD have a content filtering SWG, but until that happens, can we at least ask them to stop?" There's no SWG in the remediations though so I guess not.
How is that a deterrent control?? There is something that needs correcting after something wrong is being made at the moment. I dont see how that could be deterrent
I love your videos
This does not make sense to me. I thought 'Physical' was a control category. (It's even in the official study guide) so how can it be selected as a control type in this question?
are you studying for the sec+ 701?. This is an example of a 601 pbq i think, in the 601 objective list it states 'physical' as a control type instead of a category. i would recommend practicing sec+701 practice questions instead since they align more with the current objectives
@@woot6207 Thanks. I thought as much.
Hi just wanted to ask if all your Sec+ PBQs are relevant for 701. Because I realized there's difference in the exams and I just wanted to know if I'm learning correctly
This is the PBQ for SY0-601, for SY0-701 the answers would probably be different. For example, Control Type in scenario 3 cannot be physical, because in the new version it no longer counts as such.
great video!
Scenario 2 is really confusing
At 2:35 you said "managerial controls are things like creating policies and frameworks", but for scenario 2, you said that creating an AUP is operational.
AUP is a policy. Its acceptable use of policy.
Thanks a lot!