Lovely information. I’m glad somebody knows quantization, there’s another term from the era, “intrinsic”. So when the shape dynamic is; shapes nested inside of shapes. Then I’d say they are intrinsically bound.
can someone explain to me or link an article or something showing how this model works for odd numbered elements? yeah, I understand oxygen, silicone, iron, etc. but how about the elements with 2 or 3 protons? or 27? those are not multiples of the vertices of platonic solids.
@@lukiepoole9254 is that where you're saying the extra protons go? To the tips? As for the polygons, you're saying the odd numbered elements just make polygons from their vertices? I can see that, but I might need some visuals to see how they're all symmetrical
Everytime I watch your channel I feel like I'm stepping back to the time of the Greeks 😊 I'm starting to see that Creation literally grows from itself to a higher formation of the same aspect.
Thanks for your comment. Perhaps that Greek feeling stems from the time of Plato where his Academy allowed free debate, without persecution, for expressing your fundamental ideas, like an open forum, we do need to bring this back in, where different views on any topic are not suppressed.
7:01 Is not 92 a natural limit to complexity/simplicity in the primary nesting of spheres? i.e. once the cluster extends to a shell beginning with 93 spheres a new choice is available for the central sphere where before only one was available. Wonderful stuff you cover - so beautiful - teaches the positive creativity of dynamic Universe and to which we can tune in to at any moment since our ‘creativity’ is a reflection of it if we can develop ways to suspend ego-thinking and let it through.
Thank you so much for this. I am long time Steiner reader trying to dig deeper into transmutation and the electric universe model. It seems to me that the platonic shape may be the causal link to atomic properties. This is the first time I have come across Robert Moon. I see that I need to understand his work now as well :). Also would seem to be linked to Walter Russell's own version of the periodic table. Do you think so?
Glad you resonate to the suppressed works of Doctor Moon, he is one of my Heroes, for he understood the Platonic solid Duals and factuality, which is what Einstein never understood. I would recommend to study Moon's view of the periodic table, then contrast this with Steiner's views and many other views, they all differ somewhat but this would be great research. I won't comment as I have not done all the research, though I am interested in doing so. The elements could all fit into a spiral, a torus, or a multi-dimensional construct.There may be 108 or more or some not yet discovered. They may be new patterns and sequences.
Two numbers jumped out at me: 12 for iron and 92 as the limit for surrounding equal spheres before a possible new centre is created and a competition is established. Iron (12) - I believe - is the limit to which the fusion process goes in the normal metabolism of stars - the rest of the universal elements being created by the pressure of collapse in the dying moments of a super nova, for instance gold being produced in the last half second!
Proper nesting of the platonic solids WITHOUT structure support failure is TWO icosahedron -> one octahedron -> TWO tetrahedron(mierkaba) -> one cube -> TWO duodecahedron.
![Unique Books [Sacred Geometry]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rJkMEMZ4sbI/mqdefault.jpg)
![Unique Books [Sacred Geometry]](/img/tr.png)
![Inside my Library: Part 2 [Sacred Geometry]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Cq0JaB7pe58/mqdefault.jpg)
Lovely information. I’m glad somebody knows quantization, there’s another term from the era, “intrinsic”. So when the shape dynamic is; shapes nested inside of shapes.
Then I’d say they are intrinsically bound.
Cosmic Hierarchy - detailed break down of this series of atomic relations in ‘Synergetics’ Vol 2 - plates section - by RB Fuller.
Very beautiful!
can someone explain to me or link an article or something showing how this model works for odd numbered elements? yeah, I understand oxygen, silicone, iron, etc. but how about the elements with 2 or 3 protons? or 27? those are not multiples of the vertices of platonic solids.
The polygons : )
Also platonic solids can have extended "tips" too. Like a horn. You can see how this goes
@@lukiepoole9254 is that where you're saying the extra protons go? To the tips? As for the polygons, you're saying the odd numbered elements just make polygons from their vertices? I can see that, but I might need some visuals to see how they're all symmetrical
@@thomashoppes8594 Only for 1,2,3. 4 forms a tetrahedron.
Everytime I watch your channel I feel like I'm stepping back to the time of the Greeks 😊 I'm starting to see that Creation literally grows from itself to a higher formation of the same aspect.
Let's go Greek!
Thanks for your comment. Perhaps that Greek feeling stems from the time of Plato where his Academy allowed free debate, without persecution, for expressing your fundamental ideas, like an open forum, we do need to bring this back in, where different views on any topic are not suppressed.
7:01
Is not 92 a natural limit to complexity/simplicity in the primary nesting of spheres? i.e. once the cluster extends to a shell beginning with 93 spheres a new choice is available for the central sphere where before only one was available.
Wonderful stuff you cover - so beautiful - teaches the positive creativity of dynamic Universe and to which we can tune in to at any moment since our ‘creativity’ is a reflection of it if we can develop ways to suspend ego-thinking and let it through.
Thank you so much for this. I am long time Steiner reader trying to dig deeper into transmutation and the electric universe model. It seems to me that the platonic shape may be the causal link to atomic properties. This is the first time I have come across Robert Moon. I see that I need to understand his work now as well :). Also would seem to be linked to Walter Russell's own version of the periodic table. Do you think so?
Glad you resonate to the suppressed works of Doctor Moon, he is one of my Heroes, for he understood the Platonic solid Duals and factuality, which is what Einstein never understood. I would recommend to study Moon's view of the periodic table, then contrast this with Steiner's views and many other views, they all differ somewhat but this would be great research. I won't comment as I have not done all the research, though I am interested in doing so. The elements could all fit into a spiral, a torus, or a multi-dimensional construct.There may be 108 or more or some not yet discovered. They may be new patterns and sequences.
Two numbers jumped out at me: 12 for iron and 92 as the limit for surrounding equal spheres before a possible new centre is created and a competition is established.
Iron (12) - I believe - is the limit to which the fusion process goes in the normal metabolism of stars - the rest of the universal elements being created by the pressure of collapse in the dying moments of a super nova, for instance gold being produced in the last half second!
Proper nesting of the platonic solids WITHOUT structure support failure is TWO icosahedron -> one octahedron -> TWO tetrahedron(mierkaba) -> one cube -> TWO duodecahedron.
What about Carbon? Carbon 12 ? Can you show what the atomic structure would look like please?
Beautiful
Eu amo cristais, queria entender o que significa aquelas formação dentro do cristal que parece flocos de neve
👍👍👍
Daughter’s Art today but yesterday? Whoa WMD WMD IN MY HOME HELP ME
Labor court cases that didn’t exist but raise property taxes , using keyboards Cyborg , Calibration for shelf storage