Here are some counterarguments to the points raised in the narrative While the narrative criticizes the idea of human superiority as self-serving, one could argue that humans possess unique cognitive abilities that allow for complex problem-solving, abstract thinking, and the creation of advanced technologies. These capabilities have enabled humans to adapt and thrive in diverse environments, which could be seen as a form of superiority in the context of survival and adaptation. The argument that superiority is relative and based on personal interest can be countered by pointing out that humans have developed ethical and moral frameworks that often extend beyond self-interest. These frameworks guide actions that benefit other species and the environment, suggesting a capacity for altruism and stewardship that is not commonly observed in other species. The claim that humans self-appoint themselves as the dominant species might overlook the tangible ways in which human activities have reshaped the planet. From altering global climate patterns to causing species extinctions, the impact of humans is undeniable and suggests a level of influence that is unparalleled in the history of other species. It's true that other species also impact the Earth, but the scale and speed of human-induced changes are unprecedented. Humans have the ability to consciously reflect on their actions and make deliberate choices about their impact, which could be argued as a sign of dominance or at least significant influence. The narrative's call for existential humility could be met with the perspective that humans, through their awareness and intelligence, have the unique responsibility to manage and protect the Earth. This role does not necessarily stem from arrogance but from a recognition of the power and responsibility that comes with human capabilities. In essence, while the narrative encourages a more integrated view of humans within the natural world, these counterarguments suggest that human traits and impacts do indeed set us apart in significant ways. The debate between human exceptionalism and ecological egalitarianism is complex and multifaceted, with valid points on both sides.
@@narayanbarman5993 again you're doing the same thing like making a criteria which suits you and you say that see we can do this that why we are superior.........if it's like that....then any other species is superior..bcz they all have some special abilities....like planaria comes and says that if someone will cut us then also we won't die....thats why I'm superior
@@Star-q1y while it’s true every species has unique abilities, the concept of “superiority” extends beyond individual traits . If you think deeply you would find the very ability of human species of making criteria make them superior to any species presently known 🌀
Loved your videos bro. Your views, your thought process is amazing. It's really raising questions on our existence and what we are becoming as a species.
Here are some counterarguments to the points raised in the narrative While the narrative criticizes the idea of human superiority as self-serving, one could argue that humans possess unique cognitive abilities that allow for complex problem-solving, abstract thinking, and the creation of advanced technologies. These capabilities have enabled humans to adapt and thrive in diverse environments, which could be seen as a form of superiority in the context of survival and adaptation. The argument that superiority is relative and based on personal interest can be countered by pointing out that humans have developed ethical and moral frameworks that often extend beyond self-interest. These frameworks guide actions that benefit other species and the environment, suggesting a capacity for altruism and stewardship that is not commonly observed in other species. The claim that humans self-appoint themselves as the dominant species might overlook the tangible ways in which human activities have reshaped the planet. From altering global climate patterns to causing species extinctions, the impact of humans is undeniable and suggests a level of influence that is unparalleled in the history of other species. It's true that other species also impact the Earth, but the scale and speed of human-induced changes are unprecedented. Humans have the ability to consciously reflect on their actions and make deliberate choices about their impact, which could be argued as a sign of dominance or at least significant influence. The narrative's call for existential humility could be met with the perspective that humans, through their awareness and intelligence, have the unique responsibility to manage and protect the Earth. This role does not necessarily stem from arrogance but from a recognition of the power and responsibility that comes with human capabilities. In essence, while the narrative encourages a more integrated view of humans within the natural world, these counterarguments suggest that human traits and impacts do indeed set us apart in significant ways. The debate between human exceptionalism and ecological egalitarianism is complex and multifaceted, with valid points on both sides.
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm even microorganisms are interdependent on other microorganisms that's what I'm trying to get across, there's no "almost", it's just "all"
Dhele bhar ka bhi far nhi padega hame hatane se 🤣🤣🤣🤣 bhaii itna straight face se bola hassi aa gaya Btw what you are saying is true Bangalore m paani khatam h 😭😭
Meri samajh main Thought process aur social bonds aur skill ke mamle mai insan superior hai, magar baaki janwar survival ke mamle mai hum se bohot aage hain. Hamen apni aur baki jeev jantuon ki kabiliyat ko nazarandaz nahin karna chahiye. In the end, hum sub survive karna , aur apni peedhi aage badhana chah rahe hain. Bas, insan is sub ki gehraiyon ko janne ki koshish kar rahe hain, aur shayad koi aur jeev bhi aisa kar rahe hon.
Hello Vimoh, 1. Humans are not at all superior species of the earth as that is a value statement and values change based on point of reference(as described well by apple example). But, definitely dominant species. Especially after the Scientific revolution. 2. Dominance is ability to influence outcomes in comparison with other species. Basically powerful. And Dominant species can be different at different point of time. At a point of time it might be bacteria or Plants(mass extinction) but the question is which is the dominant species now? 3. Existence of Humans for brief period in comparison to the bacteria does not add to argument as we are trying to find the answer of dominant species today. Simple argument against bacteria being the dominant species can be : we understand bacteria more than bacteria understands humans. More the understanding, more the ability to influence the outcome. Basically, we use bacteria(curd), kill bacteria(antibiotic), modify bacteria(Biotechnology) at the stupid will of humans(we are stupid). Is that not Dominance for alien species? 4. Branding an idea as religious does not imply the idea as false or weak. Each idea, whatever be the origin, must be evaluated on its own merit. Also, not all religions of the world consider Humans as the center of the universe as abrahamic religions do.
Hey out of context question I heard someone say that this implies speed of light but I don't find it authentic coz we don't have conversion rate. What do you say. योजनान सहस्त्र द्वे द्वेे शते द्वे च योजनेन एकेन निमिषर्धेन क्रमन नमोस्तुते
They are more useful to us doesn't make them dominant. We could state it like "Grasses like wheat, paddy, etc. are dominant species IN REGARD WITH CONSUMPTION BY HUMANS"
I realised this when i saw a meme that goes "brain is the most important organ of our body, according to brain." The bit about "we are a part of nature" made me realise that i didn't heeded to the "main bhi hu nature" line in Sadda Haq.
most dominant? no. most superior? yes. definition superiority ki ye nahi hai ki humare liye kya behtar hai magar ye hai ki eat, sleep, mate aur defence hum efficiency aur ease ke saath kr skte hai aur apne aap par humara control hota hai. hum bare instincts se nahi chalte. ye idea religion se science mein aaya hai iska koi basis nahi hai. science khud hi decide krti hai ki insaan sabse uppar hai aur isiliye animal pr experiment hote aaye hai. i don't think ki scientist iski permission lene ko saints ke paas jate hain.
Vimoh, One question constantly comes in my mind. Why brains of human species only evolved rapidly within such a short period of time? But those who ruled earth for 100 million years, out of which many of them gone extinct, both from terrestrial and aquatic animals with significant large brains. Why any of them couldn't able to build any technology or civilization?
@shubamrachappanavar2708 So after 2 lakh years can we expect any other animal besides Human attaining technological advancements or atleast lights up fire of its own?
@@vimoh Uhh not like that !! I mean you're not wrong but like our minds are more advanced to be aware of our surroundings, to coordinate with each other, to know universe better and like that. I agree that mankind isn't special but there is something different in mankind... it can be DNA or mind ??
Question ye nahi hona chahiy ki humans special ya superior h... question ye hona chahiy evolution ka end point kya h? Intellect ka end point kya h... khana pina sona aur marjana to har species karleti h... why to evolute in intellect and capabality to try to control the elements around us...
superiority or inferiority is defined by metrics used to make a comparison. depending on metrics defined, we can be superior or inferior to any species. so it's not wrong to say humans are superior. you just have to also mention what metrics you use to make the comparison.
hypothetically a bug or aliens may have their own metrics. but we're the only ones around defining metrics. I agree with us needing to have humility about our place in the world. but there's no denying that homo sapiens are a badass species. humanity's perception of superiority may just be an evolutionary by product of self preservation. I don't agree that it has anything to do with religion, but we can agree to disagree.
Okay as i learn from my parents, dharm and culture that we should respect everybody personal perspectives about life so respectively can you tell me Is this your real name ? 😊
so what to conclude i mean we are not superior that's fine but isse apni life mei kya change positive change laye sry for bad english and sry if i hurt someone
We are not the superior although we're the only species so far that have defeated nature sometimes and we are in a continuous path of doing it. Defeat would be a wrong word but we can say that we have manipulated nature for our purpose.
Muje lagta human species superior nahi inferior hai kyuki ham soch sakte hai create kar sakte hai bhot destructive bhi aur fascinating bhi ham se jyada pareshan konsi species hogi bhala. Racism, sexism , comparison, wars, rapes, aur bhi bohot kuch sab hai . Insaan satisfy nahi hota kabhi baaki species ko kya farq padta hai wo toh jyada soch hi nahi sakte. Hamein baaki species se seekhne ki jarurat lagti hai 😂
Yadi ek Alien species Dharti ko observe kare, aur usay dikhe ki ek insaan ek kutte ko ghumaa rahaa hai, aur iske saath wo us kutte ki Susu potty sadak se utha Raha hai, toh Alien kya samjhega ki dominant species kaunsi hai? - wo insaan Jo us kutte ke peechhe peechhe chalta hua uski Susu potty saaf kar raha hai?
Superiority complex doesnt dwell from religion but from tribalism. Dravidians believe themselves to be superior from northies, Whites from brown, Muslims from non-Muslism. Blaming everything on religion is just picking a low hanging fruit.
In Dharmic scriptures, it is never said Humans are superior instead it is said Humans are insignificant. Humans have been just given a once in a life time opportunity to experience this life. Dharm is not equal to Religion. Only Christianity and Islam have this superiority complex that Universe have been created for Humans. Eastern philosophies never had this idea.
But sir don't you think humans are more self aware, self conscious and sentinel than other species? In this way humans are superior,,,, just my thoughts. Please comment on it
For all those who think they are very smart. If an 1 year old is left alone in wild and some how survives then you will see he will just as wild as other animals(with no whatsoever scientific knowledge). Point is that we human collectively knowns a lot. But on individual basis you aren't special.
4:35 sahi kaha Apne 😅 mujhe lagta hai insaan o sab kar ke khud ke najaro me aur insaano ke liye superior bna h par o khud ko earth ke liye superior smjhta h. 🤔
Agar yah Sara system Bhagwan ne banaya hai Jo Ishwar Allah God ne banaya hai to usne itna bada brahmand kyon banaya kis liye vah sirf Dharti banakar bhi to ine sab Ko khatm kar sakta tha....
In one video you said that we survived the covid pandemic due to our scientific advancement to prve somebody wrong who was telling the same thing but in religious perspective And now you are going the other way. So don't do double standards. The superiority human have is at inteligece levels not at physical one. A bacterium having lived far more years is for now at low level because we evolve our knowledge time to time.
Well konsi other species dusre species ko jaan paa rahi hai aur resources extract kar pa rahi hai bro agar Religion Idea de ki dharti round hai iska yeh matlab nahi ki aap ab dharti ko flat proove karne nikal jao 🤠
You asked for parallels. You never said they had to be all in one. Even we are not all in one. Can we fly without planes? Can we solve puzzles faster than a Chimp? No.
Ap ke sawal ka jawab hai. Jee han insan superior hai. Werna ap yahan beth kar ye debate nahi kar rahe hote. Kabhi dekha hai bandaron ko beth kar ye baat karte hue ke wo superior hain ya inferior.
Superiority or Inferiority depends on the matrices on which we're comparing on. For example: In the case of Intelligence, no other organism has a chance against humans. But what about other aspects? Speed, Strength, Durability, Regeneration, etc. And the answer to your counter argument; Monkeys don't have enough Intelligence to do the same things, just as humans don't have a tail and can't challenge them in a competition of climbing trees. Hope you understood, Be humble for humanity. Sayonara.
Bahut khoob vimoh sir☸️
Aapne ek unique thought ki vyakhya ki 🙏🏻
*True realisation of human life* 👍
What a clarity of thought you have my man😮😮😮😮😮😮
Here are some counterarguments to the points raised in the narrative
While the narrative criticizes the idea of human superiority as self-serving, one could argue that humans possess unique cognitive abilities that allow for complex problem-solving, abstract thinking, and the creation of advanced technologies. These capabilities have enabled humans to adapt and thrive in diverse environments, which could be seen as a form of superiority in the context of survival and adaptation.
The argument that superiority is relative and based on personal interest can be countered by pointing out that humans have developed ethical and moral frameworks that often extend beyond self-interest. These frameworks guide actions that benefit other species and the environment, suggesting a capacity for altruism and stewardship that is not commonly observed in other species.
The claim that humans self-appoint themselves as the dominant species might overlook the tangible ways in which human activities have reshaped the planet. From altering global climate patterns to causing species extinctions, the impact of humans is undeniable and suggests a level of influence that is unparalleled in the history of other species.
It's true that other species also impact the Earth, but the scale and speed of human-induced changes are unprecedented. Humans have the ability to consciously reflect on their actions and make deliberate choices about their impact, which could be argued as a sign of dominance or at least significant influence.
The narrative's call for existential humility could be met with the perspective that humans, through their awareness and intelligence, have the unique responsibility to manage and protect the Earth. This role does not necessarily stem from arrogance but from a recognition of the power and responsibility that comes with human capabilities.
In essence, while the narrative encourages a more integrated view of humans within the natural world, these counterarguments suggest that human traits and impacts do indeed set us apart in significant ways. The debate between human exceptionalism and ecological egalitarianism is complex and multifaceted, with valid points on both sides.
@@narayanbarman5993 again you're doing the same thing like making a criteria which suits you and you say that see we can do this that why we are superior.........if it's like that....then any other species is superior..bcz they all have some special abilities....like planaria comes and says that if someone will cut us then also we won't die....thats why I'm superior
@@Star-q1y while it’s true every species has unique abilities, the concept of “superiority” extends beyond individual traits . If you think deeply you would find the very ability of human species of making criteria make them superior to any species presently known 🌀
@@Star-q1y Read the counterarguments again and the very ability of human species to make criteria makes them superior to any species presently known
@@narayanbarman5993 jai ho chat gpt devta ki
People often create their own reality to avoid the truth.
I agree brother I don't know why most of us are not seeing this clear picture
Interesting and relevant topics.. I completely agree, humans are not the superior species.
Loved your videos bro. Your views, your thought process is amazing. It's really raising questions on our existence and what we are becoming as a species.
Thanks sir, I you are very intelligent
Here are some counterarguments to the points raised in the narrative
While the narrative criticizes the idea of human superiority as self-serving, one could argue that humans possess unique cognitive abilities that allow for complex problem-solving, abstract thinking, and the creation of advanced technologies. These capabilities have enabled humans to adapt and thrive in diverse environments, which could be seen as a form of superiority in the context of survival and adaptation.
The argument that superiority is relative and based on personal interest can be countered by pointing out that humans have developed ethical and moral frameworks that often extend beyond self-interest. These frameworks guide actions that benefit other species and the environment, suggesting a capacity for altruism and stewardship that is not commonly observed in other species.
The claim that humans self-appoint themselves as the dominant species might overlook the tangible ways in which human activities have reshaped the planet. From altering global climate patterns to causing species extinctions, the impact of humans is undeniable and suggests a level of influence that is unparalleled in the history of other species.
It's true that other species also impact the Earth, but the scale and speed of human-induced changes are unprecedented. Humans have the ability to consciously reflect on their actions and make deliberate choices about their impact, which could be argued as a sign of dominance or at least significant influence.
The narrative's call for existential humility could be met with the perspective that humans, through their awareness and intelligence, have the unique responsibility to manage and protect the Earth. This role does not necessarily stem from arrogance but from a recognition of the power and responsibility that comes with human capabilities.
In essence, while the narrative encourages a more integrated view of humans within the natural world, these counterarguments suggest that human traits and impacts do indeed set us apart in significant ways. The debate between human exceptionalism and ecological egalitarianism is complex and multifaceted, with valid points on both sides.
ChatGPT?
@@ChandanKumar-re9eh Bhai don't putt off his dhoti yr 😂
@@vishalrao497Give counterarguments if you have any but not your bullshit opinion 😉
@@narayanbarman5993 bhai dubara search krlo chat gpt iska bhi counter dedega 🙃
You are right. If we hadn't been superior we would be talking about our being or not being superior.
Almost every species is interdepend and no species can thus be superior by any means , even autotrops require several microorganisms to survive
And what about the microorganisms themselves?
@@loop4569 and what about the "almost every" in my comment?
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm even microorganisms are interdependent on other microorganisms that's what I'm trying to get across, there's no "almost", it's just "all"
instead of all out use mosquito net, a better sustainable option
Amazing thought ❤👌
Dhele bhar ka bhi far nhi padega hame hatane se 🤣🤣🤣🤣 bhaii itna straight face se bola hassi aa gaya
Btw what you are saying is true Bangalore m paani khatam h 😭😭
All points are 100% correct
Hello vimaoh sir इंसान जो चाहता वो कर सकता है पर वो क्या चाहेगा तो नही चाह सकता , is par ek video banaiye please sir
Thats why we should not harm animals and nature
I like meat
Commenting under just to see meat debates
@aishwarykalosia7129 pls do not shit everywhere nobody wanna know yr likes and dislikes.
There we go!
@@justalive24 relax soy boy, the comment section is for opinions! And he made his choice!
Very nice thinking sir 😊 bahut Sahi hai
I am. Spellbound after listening to this eloquent speech 👍👍❤
Meri samajh main Thought process aur social bonds aur skill ke mamle mai insan superior hai, magar baaki janwar survival ke mamle mai hum se bohot aage hain.
Hamen apni aur baki jeev jantuon ki kabiliyat ko nazarandaz nahin karna chahiye.
In the end, hum sub survive karna , aur apni peedhi aage badhana chah rahe hain.
Bas, insan is sub ki gehraiyon ko janne ki koshish kar rahe hain, aur shayad koi aur jeev bhi aisa kar rahe hon.
Yes ryt
Very deep and alarming 👏
Virus beike : mere sath insaaf nhi hua hai
Interesting point of view!
You are very underrated ❤
Thanks a lot 🙏
Great sir ❤❤
Hello Vimoh,
1. Humans are not at all superior species of the earth as that is a value statement and values change based on point of reference(as described well by apple example). But, definitely dominant species. Especially after the Scientific revolution.
2. Dominance is ability to influence outcomes in comparison with other species. Basically powerful. And Dominant species can be different at different point of time. At a point of time it might be bacteria or Plants(mass extinction) but the question is which is the dominant species now?
3. Existence of Humans for brief period in comparison to the bacteria does not add to argument as we are trying to find the answer of dominant species today. Simple argument against bacteria being the dominant species can be : we understand bacteria more than bacteria understands humans. More the understanding, more the ability to influence the outcome. Basically, we use bacteria(curd), kill bacteria(antibiotic), modify bacteria(Biotechnology) at the stupid will of humans(we are stupid). Is that not Dominance for alien species?
4. Branding an idea as religious does not imply the idea as false or weak. Each idea, whatever be the origin, must be evaluated on its own merit. Also, not all religions of the world consider Humans as the center of the universe as abrahamic religions do.
So true
Basically human creating his own happiness😅😂
Ok I agree but what about strong thinking and emotional tendency and those convolutions present in brain in more amount?
Backteria Never needed BackupRia or Angel Priya. SUPERIOR!!!
BAHUT ACCHA
Exactly what is human, who told us that we are human We labelled ourself as a human..
Make a video On Theory of relativity political, social, culture aspects
Sir please make a video on the books that are behind you.
Hey out of context question
I heard someone say that this implies speed of light but I don't find it authentic coz we don't have conversion rate. What do you say.
योजनान सहस्त्र द्वे द्वेे शते द्वे च योजनेन एकेन निमिषर्धेन क्रमन नमोस्तुते
see ScienceIsDope video on Hanuman Chalisa
Very true sir
बाकी जीवों को तो छोड़ दे।यहाँ कुछ इंसान खुद को सुपीरियर समझते हैं बाकी इंसानों से।
Gajab
3:22 *insert Obama awarding himself meme*
I think 'Dependability and Seperation of power is basic structure of Universe'.
B.S.Jadhav from Maharashtra
So you agree that the universe is not independent
@@nonameno5660 yes
Grasses like wheat/ paddy etc are dominant species.
Just being there counts as dominant?
Because they were farmed since 10000 years
They are more useful to us doesn't make them dominant. We could state it like "Grasses like wheat, paddy, etc. are dominant species IN REGARD WITH CONSUMPTION BY HUMANS"
@@No-I-dont-want-that without them human can't survive, think about it
@@prodigious5766 yep consumption. Without dem human can't survive , think about it.
I realised this when i saw a meme that goes "brain is the most important organ of our body, according to brain."
The bit about "we are a part of nature" made me realise that i didn't heeded to the "main bhi hu nature" line in Sadda Haq.
most dominant? no. most superior? yes. definition superiority ki ye nahi hai ki humare liye kya behtar hai magar ye hai ki eat, sleep, mate aur defence hum efficiency aur ease ke saath kr skte hai aur apne aap par humara control hota hai. hum bare instincts se nahi chalte.
ye idea religion se science mein aaya hai iska koi basis nahi hai. science khud hi decide krti hai ki insaan sabse uppar hai aur isiliye animal pr experiment hote aaye hai. i don't think ki scientist iski permission lene ko saints ke paas jate hain.
Vimoh, One question constantly comes in my mind. Why brains of human species only evolved rapidly within such a short period of time? But those who ruled earth for 100 million years, out of which many of them gone extinct, both from terrestrial and aquatic animals with significant large brains. Why any of them couldn't able to build any technology or civilization?
@shubamrachappanavar2708 So after 2 lakh years can we expect any other animal besides Human attaining technological advancements or atleast lights up fire of its own?
Yuval Noah Harari's famous example, if you and a baboon are left alone in the jungle then the odds of your survival will be lower than baboon's
Humans are superior in a sense that they have more consciousness
Incorrect, we would have been more sustainable if that were true. Rather we could not even develop a system which safeguards future of our species.
@@fazer79 If that's incorrect, name a species which has more consciousness than humans on Earth.
Other mammals have way better senses,reflexes,survival instincts etc
@@thunderred5263
you should read the comment again
Jai Raj comics, background mein dhruv.
Badhiya
Will you give some book recommendations as I am into atheistisim
he wouldn’t be able to because there’s no thing known as atheistism
Super ❤
mindblowing
make a video on soul
Great it's true
Mortein ki machine me all out ki refill ///
That's unity among diversity
Unity among diversity
Mortein ka machine toh dekh liya par all out ka refill kaha hai LOL
@vimoh what do you think about nonveg and veg and what will you prefer ❤
Non veg
@@ATHEIST_69 am why ?
Non veg because I find it tasty and fills my daily consumption of protein without spending a lot.
What about human consciousness ?? That definitely makes us different from all other species
Are other animals unconscious? Seem conscious to me?
@@vimoh Uhh not like that !! I mean you're not wrong but like our minds are more advanced to be aware of our surroundings, to coordinate with each other, to know universe better and like that. I agree that mankind isn't special but there is something different in mankind... it can be DNA or mind ??
Plenty of animals are aware of their surroundings and coordinate with each other.
Question ye nahi hona chahiy ki humans special ya superior h... question ye hona chahiy evolution ka end point kya h? Intellect ka end point kya h... khana pina sona aur marjana to har species karleti h... why to evolute in intellect and capabality to try to control the elements around us...
Yeh bahut sarrri science fiction mei bhi hai
superiority or inferiority is defined by metrics used to make a comparison. depending on metrics defined, we can be superior or inferior to any species. so it's not wrong to say humans are superior. you just have to also mention what metrics you use to make the comparison.
Yes. That's what it is important to remember. When we declare humans superior, we are using human metrics.
hypothetically a bug or aliens may have their own metrics. but we're the only ones around defining metrics. I agree with us needing to have humility about our place in the world. but there's no denying that homo sapiens are a badass species. humanity's perception of superiority may just be an evolutionary by product of self preservation. I don't agree that it has anything to do with religion, but we can agree to disagree.
❤
❤❤❤❤❤
What a superior video😅
so all our practices to safeguard the environment are useless or even to destroy them. Nature does as nature is.
I wish u had English translation on ur videos. 😢
Okay as i learn from my parents, dharm and culture that we should respect everybody personal perspectives about life so respectively can you tell me
Is this your real name ? 😊
Nice video
Another example is Sri Sri ravi shankar
so what to conclude i mean we are not superior that's fine but isse apni life mei kya change positive change laye
sry for bad english and sry if i hurt someone
🤐🤐🤐👍👍👍🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
3 Body Problem
Video banana rukhna nahi chaihe❤
We are not the superior although we're the only species so far that have defeated nature sometimes and we are in a continuous path of doing it.
Defeat would be a wrong word but we can say that we have manipulated nature for our purpose.
Every species defeats nature to survive
@@vimoh yup! But haven't we the most.
@@vimoh and I'm not glorifying human existence.
No. That assessment is pretty subjective.
At current rate, we might defeat ourselves, by destroying nature, wars, etc
Muje lagta human species superior nahi inferior hai kyuki ham soch sakte hai create kar sakte hai bhot destructive bhi aur fascinating bhi ham se jyada pareshan konsi species hogi bhala. Racism, sexism , comparison, wars, rapes, aur bhi bohot kuch sab hai . Insaan satisfy nahi hota kabhi baaki species ko kya farq padta hai wo toh jyada soch hi nahi sakte. Hamein baaki species se seekhne ki jarurat lagti hai 😂
Sir , How can we talk to you ?
ye to vohi kahani ho gi jisme ek chuha billi badal hwa jane kya kya bn kr fir chuha hi bn jata h
Superb 👍👍
Reject Modernity
Reject Religion
Return to monk
Yadi ek Alien species Dharti ko observe kare, aur usay dikhe ki ek insaan ek kutte ko ghumaa rahaa hai, aur iske saath wo us kutte ki Susu potty sadak se utha Raha hai, toh Alien kya samjhega ki dominant species kaunsi hai?
- wo insaan Jo us kutte ke peechhe peechhe chalta hua uski Susu potty saaf kar raha hai?
Do Aliens exist is evidence conclusive
@@nonameno5660 That was most probably an analogy.
Superiority complex doesnt dwell from religion but from tribalism. Dravidians believe themselves to be superior from northies, Whites from brown, Muslims from non-Muslism. Blaming everything on religion is just picking a low hanging fruit.
Jay bheem 🌹🌹👍🌹🌹
Kisi ko jai mst bolo ..
Architectural marvel to chiti ki behtar hoti hai😅 fir b hum sochte h ki hum superior h
Jaggi vasudev is big narcissist for today
In Dharmic scriptures, it is never said Humans are superior instead it is said Humans are insignificant.
Humans have been just given a once in a life time opportunity to experience this life.
Dharm is not equal to Religion.
Only Christianity and Islam have this superiority complex that Universe have been created for Humans.
Eastern philosophies never had this idea.
But sir don't you think humans are more self aware, self conscious and sentinel than other species?
In this way humans are superior,,,, just my thoughts. Please comment on it
Many animals have been found to be self aware.
Of course Humans are the most superior species on earth. Do we really need to debate over this absolute fact?
Only Legends know this video is reuploaded😎
He literally said he’d be reuploading his Hindi videos on this channel
For all those who think they are very smart.
If an 1 year old is left alone in wild and some how survives then you will see he will just as wild as other animals(with no whatsoever scientific knowledge). Point is that we human collectively knowns a lot. But on individual basis you aren't special.
We evolved to aurvive and live collectively.
Nah, no chance that 1 yr old would ever survive a week, unless some miracle
Jungle book lmao
Narcissistic modi😢😆😆
Do you celebrate any festival of any religion
4:35 sahi kaha Apne 😅 mujhe lagta hai insaan o sab kar ke khud ke najaro me aur insaano ke liye superior bna h par o khud ko earth ke liye superior smjhta h. 🤔
Agar yah Sara system Bhagwan ne banaya hai Jo Ishwar Allah God ne banaya hai to usne itna bada brahmand kyon banaya kis liye vah sirf Dharti banakar bhi to ine sab Ko khatm kar sakta tha....
In one video you said that we survived the covid pandemic due to our scientific advancement to prve somebody wrong who was telling the same thing but in religious perspective
And now you are going the other way.
So don't do double standards.
The superiority human have is at inteligece levels not at physical one.
A bacterium having lived far more years is for now at low level because we evolve our knowledge time to time.
Well konsi other species dusre species ko jaan paa rahi hai aur resources extract kar pa rahi hai bro agar Religion Idea de ki dharti round hai iska yeh matlab nahi ki aap ab dharti ko flat proove karne nikal jao 🤠
Ants and bees use resources to build structures. Dolphins and whales understand humans. Chimpanzees and elephants even have culture.
@@vimoh Well Bhaijaan are they all in one?
You asked for parallels. You never said they had to be all in one. Even we are not all in one. Can we fly without planes? Can we solve puzzles faster than a Chimp? No.
@@vimoh ok let me point a arrow can you give a creature that has done what us humans have done and can beat us in 60:40 Ratio or more
@@vimoh Still waiting Lol for a Rational Answer by you or by a follower of yours
Kis bacteria ne book likhi hai 😂
Tumne likhi konsi book bacteria ne pdhi hai 😂
sir aapki age kitni h ?? just want to know after watching this video!
I think he said he's 41 in some stream
@@prodigious5766 can you please provide the link of that video here
Ham har dusre janwar jiv jantu ko kabu kar pate hai
bhai tumhare jism mein bacteria bhare hue hain jo tumhara istemaal kar rahe hain.
@@vimoh wo mere liye hi hai
Agar wo nuksan dayak hai to uska ilaj ho sakta hai our wo mere fayde ke liye hai to wo mere jariye se hai wo mere bina to kuchh bhi nahi hai
tum bacteria ke liye ho ye bhi kaha jaa sakta hai.
@@vimoh bacteria mere andar hai ya mai bacteia ke andar hu
4:32 I never thought I would experience something this stupid and unnecessary from this channel.
I on the other hand, always expect pointless comments like this.
@@vimoh What you said implies that humans can’t be objective. That it’s all just opinions and stories.
Nope. Didn't say that at all.
@@vimoh why did you bring Aliens into the argument if not for saying that we aren’t capable of being objective about human significance.
bacteria parmo dharmah
We are superior animals 😂😂
Ap ke sawal ka jawab hai. Jee han insan superior hai. Werna ap yahan beth kar ye debate nahi kar rahe hote. Kabhi dekha hai bandaron ko beth kar ye baat karte hue ke wo superior hain ya inferior.
Superiority or Inferiority depends on the matrices on which we're comparing on.
For example: In the case of Intelligence, no other organism has a chance against humans. But what about other aspects? Speed, Strength, Durability, Regeneration, etc.
And the answer to your counter argument; Monkeys don't have enough Intelligence to do the same things, just as humans don't have a tail and can't challenge them in a competition of climbing trees.
Hope you understood, Be humble for humanity. Sayonara.