Atc altitude is coming from GPS, sent via ADS B, which is a communication system going through the Xpndr. Nevertheless you are right. Boeing clearly warns that even transponder altitude received by ATC may be unreliable, and cannot be used to verify barometric altitude
Yeh, there is no point in asking ATC for altitude because it'll be erroneous... This reminds of of the Aeroperu flight 603. The crew experienced unreliable airspeed and altitude indications after the static port was taped over. The crew asked ATC for their altitude indicated on radar, but unknown to the controllers and the pilots at the time, the erroneous altitude was being sent by the aircraft. The ground speed provided by the controllers was correct, as it was calculated position/time. The radio altitude would have also worked, and if available GPS altitude.
So V1 and Rotate for you was exceeding 170 knots huh? Lol!.... You were tumbling past 180 as you were raising your nose. Yeah...i'd say.....'Unreliable Airspeed' alright..... the '37 most often is getting it's nose up off the runway at around a buck-thirty-five, to 'One forty'. Not 170 Plus...
@@eggypankakes Gotcha. Airbus? yet...you have a 'Yoke?.... Ok, could be a number of modern EFIS Glass configurations. Point still stands....long, abnormal high speed ( over speed?) rollout; also, just know...for many of us, 'If it ain't Boeing..... We ain't Going'.
I never mentioned Airbus. And no, your point doesnt stand. The 777 is a massive airplane and it isnt unusual for it to take off between 170-185 kts. Its high speed, but well within the operational limits. I would agree, "If it ain't Boeing, we ain't going." It is not an "abnormal" high speed and most definitely not overspeed. If you had done what I said and looked closer, you would have noticed the words "BOEING 777" under the engine instrumentation and accepted that you were wrong. Instead, you were so incredibly overconfident in yourself you decided to write a poorly worded, poorly punctuated and a rather snarky reply. Just out of curiosity, what made you think I was calling this an Airbus?@@drumdude46
@vo-d- Well, i'm sorry you took some facts and light-observation-criticism so badly. And ...no, it's not 'exhausting', to be me. Nice sim Cockpit, all the same.
![[Limbus Company - PV] Chapter.7 - Oblivion](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VUpkXPkvoxU/mqdefault.jpg)
I love mock training videos!
Nice video
2:34 bruh this scared me
How could ATC provide you with any altitude information when their secondary radar is receiving erroneous data from the aircraft........
Atc altitude is coming from GPS, sent via ADS B, which is a communication system going through the Xpndr. Nevertheless you are right. Boeing clearly warns that even transponder altitude received by ATC may be unreliable, and cannot be used to verify barometric altitude
Yeh, there is no point in asking ATC for altitude because it'll be erroneous... This reminds of of the Aeroperu flight 603. The crew experienced unreliable airspeed and altitude indications after the static port was taped over. The crew asked ATC for their altitude indicated on radar, but unknown to the controllers and the pilots at the time, the erroneous altitude was being sent by the aircraft. The ground speed provided by the controllers was correct, as it was calculated position/time. The radio altitude would have also worked, and if available GPS altitude.
So V1 and Rotate for you was exceeding 170 knots huh? Lol!.... You were tumbling past 180 as you were raising your nose. Yeah...i'd say.....'Unreliable Airspeed' alright..... the '37 most often is getting it's nose up off the runway at around a buck-thirty-five, to 'One forty'. Not 170 Plus...
This isnt a 737, take a closer look
@@eggypankakes Gotcha. Airbus? yet...you have a 'Yoke?.... Ok, could be a number of modern EFIS Glass configurations. Point still stands....long, abnormal high speed ( over speed?) rollout; also, just know...for many of us, 'If it ain't Boeing..... We ain't Going'.
I never mentioned Airbus. And no, your point doesnt stand. The 777 is a massive airplane and it isnt unusual for it to take off between 170-185 kts. Its high speed, but well within the operational limits. I would agree, "If it ain't Boeing, we ain't going." It is not an "abnormal" high speed and most definitely not overspeed. If you had done what I said and looked closer, you would have noticed the words "BOEING 777" under the engine instrumentation and accepted that you were wrong. Instead, you were so incredibly overconfident in yourself you decided to write a poorly worded, poorly punctuated and a rather snarky reply. Just out of curiosity, what made you think I was calling this an Airbus?@@drumdude46
@vo-d- Well, i'm sorry you took some facts and light-observation-criticism so badly. And ...no, it's not 'exhausting', to be me. Nice sim Cockpit, all the same.
B777