Stella Adler - Three Sisters (1)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии •

  • @thomaskember4628
    @thomaskember4628 Год назад +2

    Three Sisters is one of my favourite plays.. Seeing Johnathan Miller's production, particularly the final act, was one of the greatest experiences of my theatre going life.

  • @skybluejellybeans
    @skybluejellybeans 12 лет назад +5

    She has so much compassion and understanding; I cried!
    This is exactly how I pictured her when I read her book... all the way down to the wine glass next to her :) What a brilliant woman!

  • @miltonjustice
    @miltonjustice  12 лет назад +6

    I wish I had more of these. I look at these and remember how extraordinary it was to be in class ... like going to church, I think. Any time I lost focus on why I was doing this, I would go to Stella's class and remember what it was like. Glad you liked it.

    • @martinatees
      @martinatees 6 лет назад

      So grateful you shared this. Thank you.

  • @micjcis
    @micjcis 7 лет назад +1

    Milton-what a gift! Totally agree with what you said about going to church. Thank you for sharing!

  • @catstaffo
    @catstaffo 12 лет назад +1

    @GeorgeWTush For a while Adler's family was trying to get Donna Murphy (who also studied with Adler) to play her in a stage production depicting Adler's life, as well as possibly a film. There were some problems so it won't get made, but I think it's notable that for the work they have someone much younger than Stritch or Lansbury in mind.

  • @maximillion17
    @maximillion17 16 лет назад +1

    just saw this play...was great x

  • @mason5r
    @mason5r 16 лет назад

    this is great. keep them coming. thanks alot

  • @RCane12
    @RCane12 16 лет назад

    Thanks so much for posting this!

  • @deanbellais3649
    @deanbellais3649 3 года назад

    I love these people on here that dispute what she is saying...or her way of achieving it. Who in the hell are you?? Who are your pupils. What is your legacy?? Who has ever spoken your name?? The world still speaks of Adler. Enough said.

  • @JoeHamid
    @JoeHamid 15 лет назад +1

    She is associating the emotion to the line and being specific not intellectualizing though at least in my mind. I just think that her techniques somewhat work for me if they don't for you then that is fine.

  • @johnfuscojpgr
    @johnfuscojpgr 10 лет назад +1

    I've tried to find THIS play. along w/ others of the last 10-15 years ( 'Calico', for example) of British production other than 'Shakespeare'.
    Preferably DVD, I hope to view an experience an entire play if they exist on film & are offered to the general public. You Tube is an option for me now too. I contacted BBC Productions, which said they are not available Q & A.
    Months later, I am no further. Any suggestions ? I'd appreciate...!

    • @greenspringvalley
      @greenspringvalley 8 лет назад +1

      something to do with copyrights.

    • @johnfuscojpgr
      @johnfuscojpgr 8 лет назад

      greenspringvalley
      Copyrights issue = par for course.
      But TY for answering ! : - )
      I actually forgot about this posting, but not wanting to watch the Romola Garai theatre productions somehow ...

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +2

    @greenrate understanding the human condition. And like Uta Hagen once said. "You take the easy road to acting, you'll be crap."

  • @leejee88
    @leejee88 12 лет назад +1

    yep i felt the same way i pictured her the same way,Now i see why brando was the way he was .it's amazing how some many people don't get this it's amazing how out of all the people who have studied under her the only one who seemed to fully get it was Marlon brando .You figure there would of been a whole army of brando's even after all this time

  • @ActorInPanic
    @ActorInPanic 13 лет назад

    @Filmdude0 Brilliant casting idea.

  • @abhishekthecreaterdairy1195
    @abhishekthecreaterdairy1195 3 года назад

    I can't hear this this video was mute ? Why

  • @actorob50
    @actorob50 15 лет назад

    beautiful.

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +3

    @tjrine85 truly understand the relationships you have with each of the character, when actors don't under their relationships, you fall into telling and not conveying. One should play it moment by moment not chasing after an objective, what do I want. when actor do that it takes you out of the scene. Makes what you do boring. Thought brings emotion, not the other way of around. By truly understanding, not playing the character by your emotions, you'll give a muplit-denominational...

  • @Filmdude0
    @Filmdude0 13 лет назад +1

    If a feature would be made about her work there is only one actress to play her.: Angela Lansbury :)

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +1

    @tjrine85 what you want, but why fight for what you want???? When character isn't doing that. Everyday people don't always have battle with themselves or other people.

  • @Filmdude0
    @Filmdude0 13 лет назад

    @ActorInPanic Thanks...I think so too :)

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +2

    @greenrate Acting is not all about the emotions. If acting was all about the emotions, acting would be boring. To really play a real to life character, one needs to understand their character, the world and what is really going on. If you don't truly understand the character or the world, you cannot play character. If actors find all this studying and anaynalizing too much work, then acting should not be their job. Acting is not an easy job. Acting is studying and understand...

  • @GeorgeWTush
    @GeorgeWTush 13 лет назад +1

    No, no. The actress who could play Stella is Elaine Stritch. She has the theatrical size and explosiveness that Stella knew how to deliver. To play Stella, one must be bigger than life. Stritch studied with Stella and eventually taught at her studio. She could do it.

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +1

    @tjrine85 character and not flat character. Even when there is an objective, an actor should never play it. Looking for the want and need ,and the objective makes you lose sight of what is really needs to be seen. And that is by understanding. When you truly understand, your emotions and imagination flows better. How will you get it, never works, because it not a battlefield on the stage. People don't always fight for what they want. If the script calls for it, then fight what...

  • @VitaliyShtabnoy1
    @VitaliyShtabnoy1 15 лет назад +1

    its true, but you are working backwards, and ultimately blocking yourself, if you work from emotion to action, you must use the action to find the emotion.

  • @actorob50
    @actorob50 15 лет назад

    they worked okay for Brando.

  • @miltonjustice
    @miltonjustice  14 лет назад

    @Khymy I assume that you've had an extremely successful career and can speak from your more advanced knowledge.

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 13 лет назад +1

    @tjrine85 Playing the objective and knowing you want, hardly never works in play or script, because 99. of the time the character doesn't know what they want. Instead one should analyze the script, and understand the world the character lives in, what is truly being said, and see the world from their character point of view (by leaving all personal judgments from the actor point-of-view. Such as my character is evil and ect.) People who are evil, don't see themselves as evil. ...

  • @LittleImpaler
    @LittleImpaler 12 лет назад +1

    Not all the time and no is not all about Objective. When it becomes all about objective, it makes the whole thing boring.