Wolfram Physics III: Completion Procedures and Basic Quantum Mechanics"
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- Find more information about the summer school here: education.wolf...
Stay up-to-date on this project by visiting our website: wolfr.am/physics
Check out the announcement post: wolfr.am/physic...
Find the tools to build a universe: wolfr.am/physi...
Find the technical documents: wolfr.am/physi...
Follow us on our official social media channels.
Twitter: / wolframresearch
Facebook: / wolframresearch
Instagram: / wolframresearch
LinkedIn: / wolfram-research
Stephen Wolfram's Twitter: / stephen_wolfram
Contribute to the official Wolfram Community: community.wolf...
Stay up-to-date on the latest interest at Wolfram Research through our blog: blog.wolfram.com
Follow Stephen Wolfram's life, interests, and what makes him tick on his blog: writings.steph... 
Наука
Such an instructive and inspiring presentation! Thanks Jonathan 😎💭☘️💥
More Visuals for visual thinkers please. And also explain the relation between Wolfram physics and Quantum mechanics with more examples. Very informative anyway !
I suggest also parallelism in a future discussion regarding higher dimensions. Cellular Automation is said to be the most parallel computer model known to science. Such parallelism has to be related to the tipping point of the computational simulation reaching Irreducibility. Parallelism could also explain quantum mechanics entirely, including higher dimensions. 1:37:22
L. Boltzmann formulated the ergodic hypothesis. An informal way to phrase it is that the average behaviour over time on a trajectory does not depend on the particular trajectory chosen. This sounds like caisal invariance.
In what sense is the completion procedure deterministic? One has to pick the reduction direction for each critical pair. (In term rewriting, to drive rewriting toward normal forms, the completion becomes deterministic thanks to term ordering.)
19:54 Looks like some mushroom clouds I've seen pictures of... And that makes me wonder if some supernovas look like hypergraphs...
Very good talk in the last twenty minutes
So the basic issue comes down to solving DEs. Even by series methods, the changing dimension alters the recurrence relations between the coefficients of the power series. Assuming no degenerate singular cases where multiple recurrences fold into the same constraint and perhaps imply a limit form of the coefficients, then the rest falls only on analytic convergence of series and the series forms allowed in the "series cover set of the integral form" to achieve analytic continuity of solution.
You guys are all way ahead of me... the technical stuff is way over my head... but i had a question... we're missing a bunch of anti-matter right? and it'd be a great resource.. in many ways....
Wouldn't it be fantastic if we could start another universe and pinch all theirs?... i mean, if we don't steal it, it'll just annihilate their matter? we'd basically be doing them a favour...
Whats the feasibility of this? Do we have anywhere big enough to put the universe once we make it?
funny, maybe they did that to us first, that's where it all went! 😂
Please do not throw out the idea of a non-collapsing universal wave function. Superposition is the current state(s) of the universe and Entanglement is the "history" of those states encoded into the universe(s). Since the observer is a subsystem of the universal wave function, that observer only see one state (or a limited subset of superimposed states) of the universe. No need to have any observer triggered collapse of the wave function.
Probably a dumb question, does the presence of conscious agents who rely Mainly on light to interact with reality, Give photons a larger Causal significance in the universe? does that make any sense?
Light definitely seem to be the most common/active "causal medium" in the universe beyond some very small scale. But I don't think it necessarily requires conscious observers/agents. The universe would still have about as many "photon events" without us or any other conscious agents. But being that light has the most causal significance in the universe at large, it also has the most causal significance to us which is interesting to think about when you consider that the brain processes more information from the eyes than any other sense organ.
@@tylerweldon4912 Right, makes sense. I understand, the "events" would be the same...I think. But I was thinking, (especially if we start moving around the galaxy more), our causal impact will spread, something I wouldn't think we'd be able to do if we, say, could only detect sound. and you're right about the eyes, the eyes will over ride our ears if what we see doesn't match what we're hearing... thanx.
@@ethanellis465 the problem is that consciousness as a concept is not well defined.
I suggest watching Wolframs talk on “How universal is the idea of numbers?”
Essentially consciousness is basically not defined well as we know it today, and that in essence, computation is the only true thing, and that what we think of as consciousness (like a brain) is just a filter for determining patterns in a system of randomness… “a computer inside another computer trying to analyze itself” if you will. Consciousness is therefor just an aspect of computation.
@@NightmareCourtPicturesI have read a few of your insights and comments across WPP videos, and have found them to be valuable and well articulated. would you be open to having a discussion or opening a channel of communication about WPP and beyond?
Why the model allows for two c phases? Isn't the speed of light structurally a constant in your combinatorial metric in the causal graph?
Is that because the early space hypergraph has a high (infinite) local dimension and then as it expands it gets lower and relatively constant dimension 3? That should say something about the type of rule that is doing this pruning of causal edges, such that a dense mesh becomes more and more like a uniform 3-d grid with 6 edges out of each node
Looks like the computational search is for substitution rules that are causal invariant and unfold an arbitrary dimension mesh into a flat 3d grid
current c would be the dislocation of a topological obstruction in 3-d grid which would then give you the scale of graph elements
makes me think: spin could be a consequence of mass - massive objects would be just a bunch of features propagating at speed of light in circles, with some directional residual.
Persisted topological obstructions we observe might be artifacts of the general 3d shape of surrounding space, and they might be dissipative if embeded in high dimension spaces.
Me developing an A->B description of quantum mechanics for illustrations seeing 1:04:00 :O
Like, has anyone else done this kind of descriptor for a QM computational diagram?
At 4:18 in video: "We thus obtain the full field equations ... such that the Wolfram model is consistent with both zero and non-zero values of the cosmological constant." Is Milgrom the Kepler of contemporary cosmology?
cosmos.nautil.us/short/144/the-physicist-who-denies-that-dark-matter-exists
Is something wrong with Einstein's field equations? Google "milgrom fredkin". I have suggested that Einstein's field equations need 3 modifications and the inflaton field needs to be replaced by the Riofrio-Sanejouand deflaton field. Consider this possibility: String theory with the infinite nature hypothesis implies the string landscape and dark matter particles exist, but string theory with the finite nature hypothesis implies Wolfram's cosmological automaton and Milgrom's MOND.
Hidden parameters or what?
Lol Johnathan rocks out to Hildegard von Bingen