동작 하나 할때마다 발도, 납도 반복... 한국 전통 검술 운운하면서 정작 발도술에 환장하는 일본 검술을 그대로 따라하는게 참 황당한 일... 정작 무예도보통지에는 발도, 납도에 대한 설명이 단 하나도 등장안할 정도로 검집은 그냥 검 보관용 정도의 의미밖에 두지 않았음...
조선세법이 본국검법보다 오래되었다는건 말이 안되네요. 본국검법은 기록상 신라 화랑의 검법이 그 시작점입니다. 즉 신라시대면 AD5~7세기쯤으로 봐야하는데, 15세기쯤의 조선세법은 아마 고려검법을 이어받아 조선때 다듬어졌을테죠. 시기상 본국검법이 더 오래되었고 조선세법에 영향을 준 토대가 되었을텐데, 왜 조선세법이 더 오래되었다고 하나요? 기록문서가 앞선다고 그러는건가요 그렇게 따지면 안되죠. 검법자체의 발생시기를 봐야지요.
Sword Dance is different than Sword FIGHT. It is a way of Art. They may do like that in here, but who knows? they might have other stance too. Japanese, Chinese Sword arts are also the same with it. Slow action for show, but different when battle. Never judge it if you never learnt it. I wouldn't agree with "They MUST have lost it" but I would agree if it's "They MIGHT have lost it"
I want to know why this video get so many dislikes....They are just demonstrating their martial art.Why should you guys care about it? Why you guys try to judge it even though you don't know ANYTHING about it?
So what? Any of existing SWORD DANCE has its origins on their born countries. Are you thinking SLOW ACTION is the important thing in this film? Huh, I don't have any words to tell you about WAY or TAO. In the case you are considering this DANCE as only a SHOW, I might be able to agree to you on the point Korean needs money. But no one can consider this DANCE as their traditional something, since there is no method. Only you can remind is, no tribes can destroy their own cultures. But Koreans do.
So you Know Korean History? Have you Lived in that Era? How can you proof that they have no Method? And about money, Why do you think If Korean Do, it's for money, and If others Do, It's for Martial Art? And also, Why all original martial arts in Korea, MUST be said to be originated from Others? How about Japanese Martial arts? So those are original? FYI, Even Japanese Kendo, and Thailand's Krabi Krabong has this kind of DANCE, which is called Demonstration. And this video is SHOWING it.
It is a lie by the Korean government and the Korean martial arts group. . Such a Korean martial arts group is proud of Muyedonotongji which is a martial arts book of the end of 18th century. However, the sentence of the opening page is described in this way. "Our country does not have the martial arts handed down from ancient times" "The martial arts that a soldier trains are only bows" The book is a copy of the Chinese 紀効新書"". And "紀効新書" is a copy of Japanese "Kageeryu mokuroku".
Why they don't keep the cutting edge upwards? Why they once stop their sword in the middle on the air meaninglessly, right after the cutting motion? Why their feet won't be aligned properly? Okay, those are just an entertainment. A kind of ugly dance. You can tell correct answers to above questions, when you deeply think the purpose of the knife skills. They must have lost it, otherwise they didn't have it from the beginning. 何故こいつら刃を下に向ける？何故納刀の直前に無意味な位置で止める？何故つま先に意識が行ってない？ これは剣術ではない。只の醜い踊りだ。
저기 죄송 하지만 이순신 장군이 가진 장도는 사용목족도 아닌대다가 썽수도는 전형적인 환도 입니다 영상속 검들은 조선의 검이 아니아 잉본 카타나 중 태도 ㅡ 장군도에 끈만달아서 조선 새법이라 우기는 겁니다 일본 군도에 가깝고 조선세법은 동작이 길게 이어지지 납도 반복러면서 발도술 하는건 아닙니다
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
동작 하나 할때마다 발도, 납도 반복... 한국 전통 검술 운운하면서 정작 발도술에 환장하는 일본 검술을 그대로 따라하는게 참 황당한 일... 정작 무예도보통지에는 발도, 납도에 대한 설명이 단 하나도 등장안할 정도로 검집은 그냥 검 보관용 정도의 의미밖에 두지 않았음...
참..아이러니...대한검도에서 조선세법을 시연한다..본을 중시하는 일본검도로 세법을 논하다...
myung jun choi 해동짝퉁검도하는놈이 말은ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
저도 다른나라역사는 모릅니다 하지만 적어도 그나라의문화나역사는 함부로 얘기하진않습니다
조선세법이 본국검법보다 오래되었다는건 말이 안되네요.
본국검법은 기록상 신라 화랑의 검법이 그 시작점입니다.
즉 신라시대면 AD5~7세기쯤으로 봐야하는데,
15세기쯤의 조선세법은 아마 고려검법을 이어받아 조선때 다듬어졌을테죠.
시기상 본국검법이 더 오래되었고 조선세법에 영향을 준 토대가 되었을텐데,
왜 조선세법이 더 오래되었다고 하나요? 기록문서가 앞선다고 그러는건가요
그렇게 따지면 안되죠. 검법자체의 발생시기를 봐야지요.
조선세법은 44세(勢) 59동작으로 이루여져 있으면 첫 동작부터 끝 동작까지 하나로 이어집니다. ruclips.net/video/fEPUf_RGfSU/видео.html
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일본도에 끈다먄 조선새법도 구나.. ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 반성쫌 허십셔
그리고 잘못알고있는게 조선검은양날검 일본도는 한쪽날이라고 잘못알고 계신데 조선검도 도는있습니다
腋に挟んでない
よって偽物
Sword Dance is different than Sword FIGHT. It is a way of Art. They may do like that in here, but who knows? they might have other stance too. Japanese, Chinese Sword arts are also the same with it. Slow action for show, but different when battle. Never judge it if you never learnt it.
I wouldn't agree with "They MUST have lost it" but I would agree if it's "They MIGHT have lost it"
I want to know why this video get so many dislikes....They are just demonstrating their martial art.Why should you guys care about it? Why you guys try to judge it even though you don't know ANYTHING about it?
왜이 사람은 일본도를 가지고 있습니까?
예로부터 전해지는 조선의 칼은 양날 직접 칼입니다.
つーかこれ、実戦では使えないだろう。
日本の型は、いかに相手に早く剣が届かせるか、相手の攻撃を食らわないかという理屈から出来ているが、これは単なる舞だもの。
それに最初の姿勢が足を揃えて棒立ちとか・・・どんだけ初動が遅れるか・・・
日本人からすると、違和感の塊ですね。
まず、持っているのは鞘の形状と全体の造りから判断すると打刀と思われるのですが、刃を下にして腰から下げています。
これは刀を「佩いている」状態で、太刀の持ち方です。
しかし抜刀してからの所作は、どちらかと言うと打刀を前提としたもの。それも居合いの所作に近い。
特に納刀の時などは、わざわざ鞘をひっくり返すか横にして、無理やり格好をつけているようにしか見えない。
本来の打刀の持ち方である、刃を上にした「挿している」状態であるのであれば、全ての所作が滑らかに続いて違和感も消えるのでしょうね。
ただしその場合は、身に纏っているものでしか違いを認識できなくなりそうですが。
그리고 밑에 분들 우리나라역사대해서 모르면서 함부로 얘기하지마십시오
歴史捏造は汚らわしいし、そもそもかっこわるいw
何ぞこれ？
またコリエイトしてみちゃったのかね
싫어요 누른놈 누군데ㅡㅡ 남의 나라전통과 무예를 무시하지마라
짝퉁임 진짜 조선세법이 아닌 뿌리없는 개짓거리
예로부터 무인들이 써왔으며 여러분들이 알고계시던 이순신장군님도 이영상에 나오는 검을 사용했습니다실제로 박물관에도 전시도 되어있고요
?? 칼 넣는 방식은 일본의 거합느낌
칼을뽑는 방법도요
腰に挿してんの日本刀じゃね？
Are you happy with playing Japanese sword? You guys need to treasure your own traditional Chinese style double edged Korean sword.
i can see some rather rudimental nihonto technique in this. interesting.
저건 카타나 아니냐??ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
So what? Any of existing SWORD DANCE has its origins on their born countries.
Are you thinking SLOW ACTION is the important thing in this film? Huh, I don't have any words to tell you about WAY or TAO.
In the case you are considering this DANCE as only a SHOW, I might be able to agree to you on the point Korean needs money.
But no one can consider this DANCE as their traditional something, since there is no method.
Only you can remind is, no tribes can destroy their own cultures.
But Koreans do.
So you Know Korean History? Have you Lived in that Era? How can you proof that they have no Method? And about money, Why do you think If Korean Do, it's for money, and If others Do, It's for Martial Art? And also, Why all original martial arts in Korea, MUST be said to be originated from Others? How about Japanese Martial arts? So those are original?
FYI, Even Japanese Kendo, and Thailand's Krabi Krabong has this kind of DANCE, which is called Demonstration. And this video is SHOWING it.
It is a lie by the Korean government and the Korean martial arts group. .
Such a Korean martial arts group is proud of Muyedonotongji which is a martial arts book of the end of 18th century.
However, the sentence of the opening page is described in this way.
"Our country does not have the martial arts handed down from ancient times"
"The martial arts that a soldier trains are only bows"
The book is a copy of the Chinese 紀効新書"".
And "紀効新書" is a copy of Japanese "Kageeryu mokuroku".
참 저도 검도를 하지만 이건 정말 아닌것 같습니다.
Why they don't keep the cutting edge upwards? Why they once stop their sword in the middle on the air meaninglessly, right after the cutting motion? Why their feet won't be aligned properly?
Okay, those are just an entertainment. A kind of ugly dance.
You can tell correct answers to above questions, when you deeply think the purpose of the knife skills. They must have lost it, otherwise they didn't have it from the beginning.
何故こいつら刃を下に向ける？何故納刀の直前に無意味な位置で止める？何故つま先に意識が行ってない？
これは剣術ではない。只の醜い踊りだ。
The Sinra sword art
Lair
일본놈들 비추 왜이렇게 날리는거야? ㅎㅎ
조선세법 모르고 해동검도영상이라 무조건 비추날리는건가
お遊戯？
This is a copy of Japanese Iaido.
예로부터 무인들이 써왔으며 여러분들이 알고계시던 이순신장군님도 이영상에 나오는 검을 사용했습니다실제로 박물관에도 전시도 되어있고요
저기 죄송 하지만 이순신 장군이 가진 장도는 사용목족도 아닌대다가 썽수도는 전형적인 환도 입니다 영상속 검들은 조선의 검이 아니아
잉본 카타나 중 태도 ㅡ 장군도에 끈만달아서 조선 새법이라 우기는 겁니다 일본 군도에 가깝고
조선세법은 동작이 길게 이어지지 납도 반복러면서 발도술 하는건 아닙니다