Physics 32 Kinetic Theory of a Gas (7 of 10) The Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 июл 2013
  • Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
    In this video I will explain the Maxwell Botzmann distribution and show you how to develop the most probable speed equation.

Комментарии • 157

  • @jamestylerhagen1624
    @jamestylerhagen1624 5 лет назад +18

    brilliant man. your videos helped me get A's in calculus based physics 1 and 2, and now they are going to help me get this A in physical chem as well. much appreciated!

  • @MichelvanBiezen
    @MichelvanBiezen  11 лет назад +35

    I am glad it helped. Thanks for the feedback.

    • @aneeqaahmad5034
      @aneeqaahmad5034 4 года назад

      Michel van Biezen thank you very much. You really made me understand it.

    • @lorenzoortiz8966
      @lorenzoortiz8966 4 года назад

      you're a life saver Mr. Van Biezen, I love you and I love your work!!

  • @kanishkagunjiyal3237
    @kanishkagunjiyal3237 4 года назад +8

    I'm from India. And I'm in High school (11th grade), and My teacher taught us this in class but I consider this as a little complicated. But ur explanation makes it easy. And the orange bow looks so cute too

  • @sanaverma8282
    @sanaverma8282 5 лет назад +7

    Finally someone coherent! Thank you so much for all your work and effort!

  • @mykeprior3436
    @mykeprior3436 7 лет назад +1

    AYE you are a freaking life saver. Finally a GOOD PHYS CHEM TEACHER/PROF. SO MUCH BETTER!!!! Can actually comprehend.

  • @LemonDrizzle26
    @LemonDrizzle26 9 лет назад +2

    Been trying to find a walk through for this for hours, this is the only explanation I have found and you explain it very well, thank you!

    • @jonathanhall1278
      @jonathanhall1278 3 года назад

      Becca M I feel you, literally hours. Hope college worked out for you haha

  • @juniorcyans2988
    @juniorcyans2988 Год назад +3

    Very cool! You just combined/connected what I learned so far in my classes of math, chemistry and physics in a single problem! I really enjoy it! It’s so fun!

  • @addlammm
    @addlammm 4 года назад

    You're awesome. When I first did the derivative I set one of my constants as C and didn't replace Cmp with V and got all my Cs mixed up.

  • @mangangninang4956
    @mangangninang4956 6 лет назад +2

    great explanation thank you for time taken. most difficult part to understand is why you choose second portion. it is little tricky but i got it. thank you

  • @DanielVazquez
    @DanielVazquez 7 лет назад +1

    It would be a pleasure be a student of your classes. Very neat and clear. My current physics teacher is very disappointing. Many classmates watch your lectures instead.

  • @chrisscott3725
    @chrisscott3725 Год назад +1

    Helped me ace Physics 2 and now a graduate course. YOU. ARE. THE. MAN!!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +1

      Great! Glad you found our videos helpful! 🙂

  • @jonathanhall1278
    @jonathanhall1278 3 года назад

    I feel the need to thank you still. This video helped me tremendously. I don’t know what it was, but my brain was shattered when my professor skipped steps 1-all of them and came up with the final product. Sincerely, thank you!

  • @recall660
    @recall660 11 лет назад

    wow ,what can say ,other than very neat and smooth .I have been struggling in understanding those concepts for a while not any more .thanks prof .

  • @chocomondongo
    @chocomondongo 9 лет назад

    Thank you!!! Great explanation, easy to understand

  • @saxmanrex
    @saxmanrex 10 лет назад +1

    Michel, that was a fantastic presentation. Bravo! I am about to take over a position as an instructor, and I have found your videos to be the most valuable on Maxwell-Boltzmann. In our application, we will be looking at the speed of neutrons. I learned a lot from your intructor techniques, and especially like how you simplified the differention process by substituting in C2. I will try to modify your lecture and apply it to the classes that I teach to my students. Thank you again!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 лет назад

      Rex. That is great! Good luck with your new position.
      We all learn from one another. I had some very good instructors when I was in school and I always aspired to be like them when I had a chance to stand in front of a classroom.

  • @oladisunolowonyo
    @oladisunolowonyo Год назад +1

    Never knew this 9yrs video would take care of my Test tomorrow ❤❤

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +1

      Glad you found our videos. Good luck on your test tomorrow! 🙂

  • @m.m6696
    @m.m6696 7 лет назад +1

    Hello prof. first, your videos have been of great help for most of my engineering classes and for that I sincerely thank you! I'm having trouble understanding the proof of 'average Energy'= 3/2*K*T using the Maxwellian distribution and 'most probable Energy'=1/2*k*T also using Maxwellian distribution, if possible can you make a video. Thanks again.

  • @kanishkagunjiyal3237
    @kanishkagunjiyal3237 4 года назад +3

    I'm 16 y.o. and I got so confused when my teacher taught this in the class. U simplified it way better..Thank youuu:)))

  • @curlymeg2173
    @curlymeg2173 4 года назад

    Thank you for this explanation. This is Great!

  • @paulg444
    @paulg444 3 года назад +1

    Michel, we would love to see your derivation of the MB distribution from the conservation laws.

  • @stephenstreet1045
    @stephenstreet1045 4 года назад +1

    Fantastic video. Thank you.

  • @usman5954
    @usman5954 5 лет назад +2

    Loved it 😍
    Thanks

  • @abubakarejaz5539
    @abubakarejaz5539 4 года назад

    Thanks for the Help sir. Really appreciated.

  • @misssweethearted
    @misssweethearted 9 лет назад +1

    great video I kinda zoned out a little bit when you were doing the derivative. Watched it at twice the speed but I do that for all the videos to save time.

    • @zakmatew
      @zakmatew 9 лет назад

      misssweethearted He used the product rule which is basically f'(x) = g'(x)*h(x) + g(x)*h'(x)

  • @vuyomajola4383
    @vuyomajola4383 4 года назад

    this guy is just too good

  • @manishmahi679
    @manishmahi679 6 лет назад +1

    Just awesome sir thank u

  • @jl5766
    @jl5766 2 года назад +1

    I was drowning on this topic until I found this video. Thank you so much.

  • @deppusharma7064
    @deppusharma7064 Год назад +1

    Hello sir It's Dushyant sharma and iam from INDIA . THIS IS THE BEST VIDEO EVER SEEN! Actually this topic comes in 11th grade in indian school but not the derivation ; due to my curiosity I watched this derivation and my all concepts are crystal clear. Thank you so much sir😘😘

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +1

      Welcome to the channel! We are glad you found our videos. (There are more than 9500 of them). 🙂

  • @Shuza007
    @Shuza007 6 лет назад +1

    Excellent

  • @hisoukaxxx
    @hisoukaxxx 4 года назад +1

    thanks you you're the best

  • @Cindersgrl27
    @Cindersgrl27 9 лет назад

    This made so much more sense than the book, thank you for posting such a helpful video. I really appreciate it :)

  • @dylankenworthy4572
    @dylankenworthy4572 6 лет назад +1

    Thank you

  • @allforfuture2914
    @allforfuture2914 7 лет назад

    sir f(E)=Ae^-E/kt can you plz tell about constant A

  • @satyamkumar567
    @satyamkumar567 5 лет назад +2

    Thanks sir

  • @riddhimanhazarika4066
    @riddhimanhazarika4066 5 лет назад +1

    Aweasome sir.....
    Nice, simple n easy

  • @maroon4921
    @maroon4921 3 года назад +1

    much thanks!! really helpful lecture :)

  • @dantesinfernoization
    @dantesinfernoization 8 лет назад +6

    sir you are awesome
    -California community college student

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  8 лет назад +1

      +dantesinfernoization What community college do you attend?

  • @user-qt7rr9oc8r
    @user-qt7rr9oc8r 4 года назад

    Thank you so much

  • @alirezarahimi7956
    @alirezarahimi7956 2 года назад +1

    Great video, thank you.🙏🙏🙏

  • @Pamela777Carlita
    @Pamela777Carlita 9 лет назад

    Thank you!!!!

  • @Kemaaaaa
    @Kemaaaaa 7 лет назад +2

    I wanna see the derivation of f(v). Is it somewhere to be found?

  • @abdelstar3999
    @abdelstar3999 3 года назад +1

    great man , thank you very much

  • @blackbrute2504
    @blackbrute2504 6 лет назад +1

    Tq very much sir😊

  • @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225
    @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225 3 года назад +2

    Do you happen to know how to calculate the standard deviation of the molecular energy? I’ve looking for this all over the internet, I read a lot of books and nothing, can you help me please

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +1

      We need something more specific than "molecular energy". However we know the curve of black body radiation (known as the blackbody radiation curve) and that curve represents the vibrational modes of the molecules of the walls of the blackbody. (The radiation curve of objects) So start with looking up the blackbody radiation curve. (and it is not a normal distribution curve)

    • @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225
      @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225 3 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen i was talking about maxwell-Boltzmanns energy distribution, the derivation of the energy

  • @osimothobi2972
    @osimothobi2972 3 года назад +1

    Seven years later🥇

  • @enzolong9085
    @enzolong9085 3 года назад +1

    Thank you so much!!

  • @juliakuok
    @juliakuok Год назад +2

    Thank you!

  • @hanafarhana136
    @hanafarhana136 4 года назад

    Thank u sir !

  • @renatoberaldo2335
    @renatoberaldo2335 Год назад +1

    Why do you use e instead 2 or other number ?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +2

      e is the natural number and appears in many natural processes.

  • @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225
    @flamencocejaarmandoalfonso4225 3 года назад +1

    Super nice tutorial

  • @user-re2vi9rp6r
    @user-re2vi9rp6r 6 месяцев назад +1

    thank you usa you are my best friend

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 месяцев назад +1

      You are welcome. Glad you found our videos.

  • @mahmoudtony6905
    @mahmoudtony6905 3 месяца назад +1

    wow It's the first time to understand that derivation

  • @omegapolar1355
    @omegapolar1355 2 года назад

    Thank You!

  • @snehasisdas9166
    @snehasisdas9166 3 года назад

    Where is the video of calculation of the rms velocity using maxwell distribution??

  • @RahulPrajapati-np4zh
    @RahulPrajapati-np4zh 6 лет назад

    Sir is not to mind for exam.... but any thing also that to tips form physics

  • @noehoungbe6355
    @noehoungbe6355 2 года назад +1

    Best Man !! :))

  • @MegaJayLover1
    @MegaJayLover1 5 лет назад

    Great explanation! I just have one question: why does the higher temperature result in a “flatter and longer” graph? I understand that it’s because T is in the denominator of both fractions, but how exactly does that translate to a lower and longer graph? Thank you!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 лет назад +1

      Assuming that the number of molecules is fixed, the vertical axis represents the number of molecules in the sample with a particular velocity. As you heat up the gas, the velocity of the molecules will increase and the number of different possible velocities will increase as well. Since there are now more velocities the molecules can have, there will be less molecules with the same velocity and the curve will be lower.

    • @MegaJayLover1
      @MegaJayLover1 5 лет назад

      Michel van Biezen Oh right, that makes so much sense! Thank you!

  • @telescope6640
    @telescope6640 2 года назад +1

    Maxwell-Boltzmann satatistice
    Do you have a video about it?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 года назад +1

      Just what you see in this playlist. We also have additional videos here: PHYSICS 32 KINETIC THEORY OF A GAS ruclips.net/video/GgiWD-MJicQ/видео.html

  • @adibmd.ridwan
    @adibmd.ridwan 6 лет назад +1

    please give me any link to get Maxwell velocity distribution derivation

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 лет назад +1

      Are you referring to the Stephan - Boltzmann distribution derivation? We don't have a video on that yet.

    • @satyamkumar567
      @satyamkumar567 5 лет назад

      @@MichelvanBiezen then sir please make the video

  • @nicolasvillabrille8880
    @nicolasvillabrille8880 4 года назад

    MAESTROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @mariyahaxix2360
    @mariyahaxix2360 3 года назад +1

    where is the root mean square velocity of gas?????????:( :( I see both videos of average velocity and most probable velocity these are the only videos I was looking for, but video of mean square velocity is missing :(

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  3 года назад +1

      It is in the playlist: Physics 32 Kinetic Theory of a Gas (6 of 10) Average, Mean, and Root Mean Square Velocity

  • @allforfuture2914
    @allforfuture2914 7 лет назад +6

    sir plz can you give a brief lecture on degrees of freedom

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 лет назад +5

      I have added it to the list of topics to cover.

    • @allforfuture2914
      @allforfuture2914 7 лет назад +1

      thankyou sir

    • @lollabytaskmaster4586
      @lollabytaskmaster4586 6 лет назад

      hahahaha thats an actual topic? Its remarkable how 'they' can use irony and sardonicism and not be aware

  • @tiffytiffy8036
    @tiffytiffy8036 7 лет назад +1

    Sir could you make videos on uniform circular motion

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 лет назад +1

      Take a look at these: PHYSICS 11 ROTATIONAL MOTION

  • @numan3815
    @numan3815 Год назад +1

    If, most probable velocity is the max value of the function how can it be Vrms>
    Vmp? (Vrms = sqrt3RT/M, Vmp = sqrt2RT/M)

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  Год назад +1

      3 > 2 Not sure if we understood your question correctly. (Or are you asking WHY Vrms > V mp?)

    • @numan3815
      @numan3815 Год назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen sorry professor, i got it wrong now i understand. (I thought Vmp and Vrms on the y-axis)

    • @numan3815
      @numan3815 Год назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen you are the best thanks for the videos 👑

  • @chufuonlinestudy3074
    @chufuonlinestudy3074 6 лет назад +1

    sorry sir plz help me,,, what are the significance of RMS,the mean and the most probable...

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 лет назад +1

      The mean is the same as the average. The RMS (root mean square) is the "effective" average, since the molecules with the greater velocities carry more "weight" in the averaging process. (That is the same as the "averaging" of the AC current and AC voltage. We use the RMS voltage and RMS current to find the "average" voltage and current. The most probable velocity is the velocity which has the most molecules traveling at that velocity.

    • @chufuonlinestudy3074
      @chufuonlinestudy3074 6 лет назад

      thank uuuuu sir,,,,,,always am proud to listen your lecture and the way you answering me i was getting more concepts,,,💪💪💪

  • @adibmd.ridwan
    @adibmd.ridwan 6 лет назад

    Sir , I have a question.
    here , V(mp) is the maximum value of maxwell function f(v).
    So, why v(mp) is smaller than v(rms) ?
    ....v(mp)/v(rms) = (2/3)^0.5 < 1
    but why????
    Please answer me Sir.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 лет назад +1

      The vertical axis represents the probability that you will find a molecule with that velocity, (or it represents the number of molecules with that velocity in a volume). mp = most probable. It is more likely you will find a molecule with that velocity compared to finding a molecule with RMS velocity.

  • @nadyapuspitasari7850
    @nadyapuspitasari7850 3 года назад +1

    Thankyou

  • @footpot
    @footpot 10 лет назад +15

    thannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnk you soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 лет назад +3

      footpot,
      Glad these are helping. Thanks for the feedback.

    • @footpot
      @footpot 10 лет назад +2

      hahaha, helping no, that's an understatement your getting me through first year physics at university. Would it be possible to make videos on more complex and in depth physics (i.e deriving equations, particle physics, cosmology, further quantum mechanics and sticking to algebraic answers and to save time). thank you again

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 лет назад +2

      footpot
      Yes, that is all in the plan, but it takes time to put out these videos. At this time there are some astronomy videos, that include some cosmology (the big bang theory) and I am planning a series on particle physics in the next several weeks.
      Regarding your comment: "deriving equations", which equations were you thinking of?
      Thanks

    • @footpot
      @footpot 10 лет назад +3

      ALL of them, i'm not even joking. We expected to be able to derive every equation we use, so we not given an equation sheet. When ever you use a new equation, just spend the first video deriving it (even if its short). One equation that come to mind is snell's law, but any and every equations need to derived. Also don't be afraid to put more ads on the videos your content is good, students will still your videos watch.
      if you want i can send you a list of topics covered by most first year courses, (this is the best group to target, as RUclips is already saturated with high school physics videos)
      sorry about the bad grammar its 3am here and i've been working since 1pm

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  10 лет назад +2

      footpot
      OK Thanks. That gives me a good idea.
      You better get some sleep. 3AM? What time zone are you in?

  • @carafentyyy2117
    @carafentyyy2117 4 года назад

    i love you

  • @islamictalks3658
    @islamictalks3658 3 года назад +1

    Nice

  • @Srinivasrao-hh5gx
    @Srinivasrao-hh5gx 2 года назад +1

    Excellent explanation. But isn't R the gas constant? In the video you said its Avogadro number. I have a doubt.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 года назад +2

      R is indeed the gas constant. (I may have misspoken).

    • @Srinivasrao-hh5gx
      @Srinivasrao-hh5gx 2 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen oh! I didnt expect that you'd respond to my comment. Thank you.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  2 года назад +2

      We try to repond to questions when time allows. You are welcome.

    • @Srinivasrao-hh5gx
      @Srinivasrao-hh5gx 2 года назад +1

      @@MichelvanBiezen thank you

  • @osocrazy181
    @osocrazy181 10 лет назад

    thannk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u

  • @andreaorozco9660
    @andreaorozco9660 7 лет назад +1

    Why is there no dv? Is it only there when using dN/N????

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 лет назад +1

      Since f is a function of v, f' = df/dv (Like y if a function of x, so y' = dy/dx)

    • @andreaorozco9660
      @andreaorozco9660 7 лет назад

      Michel van Biezen Oh you replied! Thank you so much! I have another question: can the most probable velocity be found using integration? Can vrms be derived using the method you showed in the video???

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  7 лет назад

      The standard method to find the most probable velocity is using differentiation, because you are looking for the point where the slope is zero (where the derivative is zero). Vrms is found using a different method.

    • @andreaorozco9660
      @andreaorozco9660 7 лет назад

      Michel van Biezen ahhhh I get it now! thank you for answering all my questions, sir!☺

  • @rajatmeena7341
    @rajatmeena7341 4 года назад

    What is 'm' in the equation
    Is that molar mass or mass of one molecules or mass of all the molecules

  • @ManojKumar-cj7oj
    @ManojKumar-cj7oj 3 года назад

    Ha ha, profassor you are extra ordinary good❤️

  • @chufuonlinestudy3074
    @chufuonlinestudy3074 6 лет назад

    Greetings hope you are doing fine. I got a challenge on what exactly is the law of Maxwell-Boltzmann of diistribution for velocities of mokecules in a gas .

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  6 лет назад

      Assume you have a box with 1000 gas molecules. They would not all have the exact same velocity. Some would move a little faster and some would move a little slower than the average (or the most probable velocity). If you then plot each velocity of every molecule on a histogram, you would get the curve seen

    • @chufuonlinestudy3074
      @chufuonlinestudy3074 6 лет назад

      +Michel van Biezen ok thanks you a lot sir,,and when we want to deduce the maxwell boltzaman law for the velocuties we will deduce all the velocities e.g vmps,averag velocitie ???

  • @ironuranium3927
    @ironuranium3927 5 лет назад

    why we use v (rms) most of the time?

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  5 лет назад

      Statistical analysis shows that V rms gives us the correct total kinetic energy of the gas molecules. We have some videos on that topic in the playlist.

  • @ornguzejosepht163
    @ornguzejosepht163 8 лет назад

    Boltzmann distribution of speeds

  • @jellyfrancis
    @jellyfrancis 2 года назад

    I need the derivation please ❤️

  • @kqp1998gyy
    @kqp1998gyy 3 года назад

    Most probable mean most likely velocity

  • @kanishkagunjiyal3237
    @kanishkagunjiyal3237 4 года назад +2

    In my country we take the gas constant as R and not K 😂😂. Like there ths R=0.0821 almost everywhere in each and every book

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 года назад +2

      With the MKS system of units, the correct value is R = 8.315 J/mol k But with non-standard units used in chemistry R = 0.08206 liter-atmosphere/mol K

    • @tis_ace
      @tis_ace 4 года назад

      Same here im also from india and this topic was not fully explained by the teacher so here i go on RUclips and find great lectures by you dear sir
      Thanks alot

  • @SaurabhKumar-pd5qw
    @SaurabhKumar-pd5qw 3 года назад

    Explanation is amzing and awesome buttttttt the formula on the image of the video is wrong.

  • @stardust5806
    @stardust5806 4 месяца назад +1

    nice video but your standing in front of the equations so difficult to follow you, and you don't stand out of the way long enough for us to see the screen. Just a recommendation.

    • @MichelvanBiezen
      @MichelvanBiezen  4 месяца назад +1

      Yes, we are now shooting our videos differently to prevent that.

  • @Princekumar-ht6ix
    @Princekumar-ht6ix 6 лет назад

    Very bad
    Maxwell's Boltzmann distribution ko define nahi Kiya or nahi ushka statistics ko bataya

  • @sellamelinda3855
    @sellamelinda3855 3 года назад

    Thanks sir