I find your method of delivery humourous and helpful. I usually study late and need to stay awake. These videos usually do the trick and redirect me on the right track when I am struggling with an ABA concept. Thank you for making these.
John Watson (methodological): black box that we can’t see and won’t worry about. Skinner (Radical): covert events are still bx and we must consider and account for them. Although difficult to do; it’s still bx! Great post!
I wouldn’t say it was “founded” rather formulated over decades. However, you could argue that Skinner’s Science and Human Behavior (1953) is a decent birthplace.
I don't know why. Maybe I'm confused in the way he is presenting it, but according to my professor who was a student of B. F. Skinner and teaches at the UC of Davis, the belief of Radical Behaviorism is "Mental processes either don't exist or are epiphenomenal (have no usual impact on behavior)", while methodological behaviorism believed "mental activity may exist, but it cannot be observed and cannot be studied scientifically. Behavior can be observed, so it can be studied scientifically". So if I'm hearing him correctly it is backward?
You’ve got it backwards my friend. Feel free to ask your prof. Watson - methodological. Skinner - radical. It’s what made him RADICAL compared to Watson - he was ok with internal events just that they only have an audience of one.
@@PsychCore I'm sorry but I thought you meant in general which was surprising to me! My apologies for the misunderstanding. On a side note, please keep up the good work! Your videos are incredibly helpful, entertaining, and for the most part, short and to the point! You explain complex concepts in a way that is easy to understand and I just wanted to say thank you and keep it up!
I find your method of delivery humourous and helpful. I usually study late and need to stay awake. These videos usually do the trick and redirect me on the right track when I am struggling with an ABA concept. Thank you for making these.
Thank you for the compliment and let us know if we can help!
John Watson (methodological): black box that we can’t see and won’t worry about.
Skinner (Radical): covert events are still bx and we must consider and account for them. Although difficult to do; it’s still bx!
Great post!
Thanks!
I just want to let you know; this channel is much appreciated and the delivery of content is incredible. Thank you!
Appreciated! Pleas share. We have alot in store coming up this year!
PsychCore I have an entire cohort to share with. 👍🏻
Prefect, we want all of the questions!
This really helped, thank you!
I have been struggling to understand the definition of methodological behaviorism and radical behaviorism. Thank you!
Your sinner impersonation is on point! Loved it! Thank you
Um, SKINNER impersonation *face palm*
Another great explanations mate ! Ur awesome
thank you so much this was a very helpful video!
Thank you. I was really struggling to grasp this concept for some reason.
It's why we are here
Amazing videos and content ! Liked, shared, and subscribed. Please keep up the awesome work , cheers !
Will do. Ask questions or comment what you would like to see next!
The videos seem very quiet to me compared to other videos.
When was radical behavorism founded?
I wouldn’t say it was “founded” rather formulated over decades. However, you could argue that Skinner’s Science and Human Behavior (1953) is a decent birthplace.
I don't know why. Maybe I'm confused in the way he is presenting it, but according to my professor who was a student of B. F. Skinner and teaches at the UC of Davis, the belief of Radical Behaviorism is "Mental processes either don't exist or are epiphenomenal (have no usual impact on behavior)", while methodological behaviorism believed "mental activity may exist, but it cannot be observed and cannot be studied scientifically. Behavior can be observed, so it can be studied scientifically". So if I'm hearing him correctly it is backward?
You’ve got it backwards my friend. Feel free to ask your prof. Watson - methodological. Skinner - radical. It’s what made him RADICAL compared to Watson - he was ok with internal events just that they only have an audience of one.
You've never heard Skinner speak?
Well not in person, no. Plenty of times via recordings.
@@PsychCore I'm sorry but I thought you meant in general which was surprising to me! My apologies for the misunderstanding. On a side note, please keep up the good work! Your videos are incredibly helpful, entertaining, and for the most part, short and to the point! You explain complex concepts in a way that is easy to understand and I just wanted to say thank you and keep it up!
Well thank you for the big reinforcer! Please let us know if there is a topic you think we need to cover.
Good information, but the method of presentation is terrible. Shouting, screaming, circus.