Laowa Ranger Cinema Zooms vs Photography Zooms

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 авг 2024
  • This is a review of the Laowa Ranger cinema lenses. I do address a few main questions of the difference between a stills lens and a cinema lens then we discuss more about the qualities you get from the lens.
    Laowa Ranger 28-75mm: geni.us/v6WCj
    Laowa Ranger 75-180mm: geni.us/VA2bNL8
    SUPPORT MY CHANNEL WITH MY LUT:
    Summer Vibe- geni.us/By0ro
    Morris One- geni.us/WmROs
    All my sound design was using:
    EPIDEMIC SOUND- geni.us/LiAO
    Thank you for watching my video. YOU make these videos happen from your support so please like, share and subscribe if you already haven't.
    Timestamps
    00:00 Intro
    01:14 Specs
    01:47 Build quality
    02:19 Gear rings
    03:05 Parfocal
    03:22 T-stops
    04:29 Characteristics
    05:23 Chromatic aberration
    06:13 Focal lengths
    06:45 Image Quality
    07:37 Lens support
    08:34 Focus breathing
    09:23 Distortion
    09:50 Minimum focus
    10:15 Lens flares
    10:47 PL mount
    MAIN CAMERAS:
    Sony FX6: geni.us/SPr5RR
    Sony FX30: geni.us/9snxhw4
    Sony A7IV: geni.us/xa7Vw
    Sony ZV-E1: geni.us/oV6O5
    SECONDARY CAMERAS:
    Sony A7III: geni.us/sfBgW
    Sony ZV-1 M2: geni.us/nxbkbAC
    Sony a6000: geni.us/BwB7csw
    DJI Mini 3 Pro: geni.us/Fidtn
    DJI Mini 2: geni.us/B4OStvI
    =============================
    Film Making GEAR
    Digitalfoto Thanos Pro II: geni.us/YwuIVl
    Digitalfoto Thanos SE: geni.us/bDqzEA
    Neewer Tripod: geni.us/ZqYs2
    Sirui Tripod: geni.us/bmlo
    DJI RS3 Pro: geni.us/ywYX1b
    FeiyuTech Scorp: geni.us/2KPTgf
    Zeapon Micro 2 slider: amzn.to/2wsu1D4
    =============================
    LIGHTING:
    Nanlite Forza 300B: geni.us/lCvr72
    Nanlite Pavo tube 30c: geni.us/CzR2WVc
    Godox VL 300 COB light: geni.us/McrXZ
    Godox SL 200w ii COB light: geni.us/Efd0lAu
    Godox M1 small LED RGB lightL: geni.us/QbSBcx6
    Neewer 120cm Soft Box: geni.us/Bi4FWv
    Neewer C-Stand: geni.us/zHaDHM
    =============================
    APS-C Kit:
    Sigma 16mm f1.4: geni.us/WhQXd
    Sigma 30mm f1.4: geni.us/xo7WGn
    Sony 50mm f1.8 OSS: geni.us/MYLidN
    Sony 18-135mm f3.5-5.6: geni.us/xuwV2h
    Sony 18-105mm f4: geni.us/NlNTm5y
    =============================
    Full Frame Kit:
    Sirui 50mm T2.9 Anamorphic lens: geni.us/83FRc4h
    Sony 85mm f1.4 GM: geni.us/4ApmMI
    Sony 50mm f1.4 GM: geni.us/749KlX9
    Sony 35mm f1.4 GM: geni.us/60fWV
    Sony 24mm f1.4 GM: geni.us/ZE31znC
    Sony 24-105mm F4 OSS G: geni.us/Jr3ED
    Tamron 28-75mm f2.8: geni.us/TH1sN
    Tamron 17-28mm f2.8: geni.us/tcq2483
    Sony 28-135mm f4 Power Zoom: geni.us/tuaQf9N
    Sony 85mm f1.8: geni.us/MFI7j
    Meike 50mm T2.1 Cine Lens: geni.us/OAc2J1
    =============================
    Sound Studio Set up:
    Synco Mic- D1: geni.us/YA1Oz
    Zoom h5 recorder: geni.us/TkqJ8
    Outdoor Set Up:
    Rode Video Mic Pro Plus: geni.us/JC1a
    =============================
    DISCLAIMER:
    =============================
    Companies send me products to review and they by all means do not tell me to say anything about it being a positive or negative review. I review all products with my own personal opinion. If a video is ever sponsored I will make it clear.
    Affiliate Links:
    =============================
    Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means, at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a purchase.
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 36

  • @linnanjanne
    @linnanjanne 11 месяцев назад +3

    Great video, mate!
    This reminds me of when I spoke about cine lenses for my photography friend. At that time, he was about 20 years experience of in photographs. He even didn't know that cine lenses exist... Then I tried to explain the differences between photo and cine lenses, but he didn't (or even want to) understand. He was so pissed off because I did know more things about cameras than he did...
    Oh, those photographers...😂

    • @JasonMorrisphotocinema
      @JasonMorrisphotocinema  11 месяцев назад +2

      hahaha. We just have to think about others not knowing and just chill our minds for a second

  • @Axel.Hernandez
    @Axel.Hernandez 11 месяцев назад +5

    Liked for the DBZ reference

  • @eldengard23
    @eldengard23 8 месяцев назад

    old DSLR lenses, while not having hard stops at infinity or close focus, are atleast direct drive with a clutch. Something also to consider because for instance i use a nikon 24-70 2.8E VR on my z9 as my video set-up with Nucleus Nano II and it costed me 1.1k euros few months ago. It's nowhere near parifocal nor breathingless, but atleast in the breathing compartment it's very close to the Ranger zooms, so in my mind you can make it work for a lot less, and have VR added on top

  • @hichamlrazwani9201
    @hichamlrazwani9201 11 месяцев назад

    ❤❤

  • @JorgeLeonardoMartinez998
    @JorgeLeonardoMartinez998 Месяц назад

    Hi did you shim the adapter or lens when you put them on your camera?

  • @markwiemels
    @markwiemels 11 месяцев назад +3

    Surely you just bought them because having a lens named “Ranger” if freakin awesome ;-)

  • @mattknight533
    @mattknight533 7 месяцев назад

    a lot of chat about GM lenses. i've got a 24-70 gm2 and would happily get rid of it for this.

  • @DynamicLearning4u
    @DynamicLearning4u 11 месяцев назад +1

    Parfocal is probably a good reason to get them... if you are shooting for a movie? If everything your client wants goes to social media and want a fast turn around, this lens may give you more trouble than pleasure.

    • @JasonMorrisphotocinema
      @JasonMorrisphotocinema  11 месяцев назад +3

      For fun and gun style social media content yes. There are high end commercials for social media too that won’t touch auto focus lenses

    • @Donbros
      @Donbros 11 месяцев назад

      It can be used to spice up longer project. Those perfect gm can become a little bit boring. So you use 75% gm and then 25% those special cinema lenses. At least what i use my anamorphic usually for

    • @DynamicLearning4u
      @DynamicLearning4u 11 месяцев назад

      @@JasonMorrisphotocinema Yes, then they mount a DJI Lidar unit to make them autofocus... >.

    • @Eyeofkamau
      @Eyeofkamau 11 месяцев назад

      How can it give you more touble if fast turnarounds are only relevant to post production?

    • @Lizzzzzzy921
      @Lizzzzzzy921 11 месяцев назад

      @@Eyeofkamau it takes much longer and is more tedious to manually focus a lens without a focus puller

  • @Donbros
    @Donbros 11 месяцев назад

    Cine has much nicer focus ring ngl. But gm wins in light factor for what you get

  • @martinmcguire2329
    @martinmcguire2329 9 месяцев назад

    Ranger VS OOOM I want to see a video or a short at least

  • @racemode
    @racemode 11 месяцев назад

    Wait... Another camera?😮

  • @SteveWB
    @SteveWB 11 месяцев назад +3

    It amazes me how people are so stuck up sony's butt that they think sony is the only way to go.... If you need to nurse off sony that's fine but that doesn't mean that is the right for all. I thing Gmaster lenses suck!

  • @matthewhartman7176
    @matthewhartman7176 11 месяцев назад +1

    "Character is everything".
    This can't be evangelized enough imo.
    Character is THE number one criteria for me when shopping for a lens. Number one. If it doesn't have character I don't proceed. What's the point?
    The "filmic" or "cinematic" look is in part due to the lens' character. This type of look is a thick, painterly look. What does that mean in a practical sense? It means you have softer edge gradation, but great light transmission and reproduction to capture detail. Sharpness and detail are not the same thing.
    If you're going for a painterly look, you'll stay far away from hyper-sharp tack edge, clinical glass. This works against you more than for you.
    I still to this day reach from my Canon FD primes. "Character"for days. Pro Mist need not apply.
    As a side note I would love to see a cine zoom that isn't as long as my forearm, and stokes nightmares of broken mounts. Someone is going to figure out a way.

  • @VladislavDoroshuk
    @VladislavDoroshuk 11 месяцев назад +1

    Still no clue why it's better than my 24-70 gm ii

    • @user-ei2hb7nt8i
      @user-ei2hb7nt8i 11 месяцев назад +1

      Yeah, definitely.
      GM - clean image, best AF.
      More "character" - Samyang, Tt, Meike, ect.

    • @JasonMorrisphotocinema
      @JasonMorrisphotocinema  11 месяцев назад

      clean

    • @Lizzzzzzy921
      @Lizzzzzzy921 11 месяцев назад +1

      Because of focus breathing and it looks so unprofessional idk why its so hard to comprehend. Its a different workflow you are usually using these lenses in professional environments where you have a focus puller and you can redo the shot if needed they arent made for run and gun or wedding photography. I personally rarely use my surui cinema lenses or anamorphics and I agree that Sony’s autofocus even for video is incredible and plenty good for most applications but its stupid to even compare them. If I could get a gm lens without that clean clinical over contrasty look I would but I will settle because of the ease of use

    • @VladislavDoroshuk
      @VladislavDoroshuk 11 месяцев назад

      @@Lizzzzzzy921 I barely can call sirui a "cine lens". It's little bit more than a "no-name". Zeiss is a starting point in cine lenses.
      You can run gm in a manual mode and get zero breathing. Modern sony cameras have breathing compensation.
      Sony GM's are an ultimate kit for any pipeline.

    • @matthewhartman7176
      @matthewhartman7176 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@Lizzzzzzy921
      The only one worried about focus breathing is the professional worried about focus breathing. Everyone else is hopefully engrossed in the content being recorded.

  • @KofiYeboah
    @KofiYeboah 11 месяцев назад +3

    Nah, lenses are trash , G Masters all the way bro.