umm actually, ubisoft is a victim...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- assassin's creed fell off bruh. but some of this assassin's creed shadows controversy doesn't make sense to me tbh.
if you're mad about the samurai champloo comparison, then you're cracked. your argument isn't that hip-hop is bad, or that it doesn't fit in the cultural context for Yasuke or feudal Japan, it's that it was implemented poorly. and when was the last time Ubisoft implemented something well? the same company that had the exact pirate game we wanted locked in a vault and then decided to release garbage live-service slop instead? no. be so fr.
if you read this you have to subscribe.
________________________________
be a guy, like and subscribe
#assassinscreed #ubisoft #videogames
the problem that the book was only used as a big source now, before was just footnote here and there and small mentions. Since now it was used to make AC and Japanese in general took knowledge of the amount of disrespect to their culture inside not only this book but on the game, thats why it became a thing. Sure you can see mentions on the hip hop music or Yasuke being a Samurai yada yada, but those are rly insanelly small problems in comparison to big problems that the book by Thomas Lockley brought, or AC as well. Heck they didnt even care about researching japanese history and made villages based on Thailand ancient history, and mixed a shit ton of chinese in the middle of it plus there are many kanji on the trailer that doesnt even exist hahaha... its like they didnt even try.
THIS. yes, and i recognize the issue im talking about is small but the real problem is the fact this guy has been going around for nearly a decade doing this. everything else is, well did you really think ubisoft was gonna do a good job? honestly? ofc not
@@hazyhezzy Funny enough in other assassins creed they actually did, so much that they are being recognized by other fields and even helping real like... the Notre-Dame's Cathedral restoration using AC as a reference on how loyal it was or any european history based game on AC that it was always on point oon the culture...
But when its Japan they just use the symbol without much care and mix a bunch of asian culture and call it Japanse XD..... they didnt even try to consult about Japanese culture... its like they read some anime/manga and said "there, we did our japanese research" lol.
@shin-iti yeah but that was a different ubisoft with like a prolific creator at the helm. i cant remember his name but i don’t think its a dislike for japan or uncaring for their culture, i dont think ubisoft cares about the games it makes anymore, they just put out slop.
Bro your just giving excuses to forgive the terrible history alteration that Ubisoft was trying to do bc IF they had done a little bit of research this could have been easily avoided.@@hazyhezzy
heres the thing, Ubisoft is indeed at fault because they would have never gone for Lockley's story if they weren't trying to push for DEI, past games have showed that AC has always had fictional main character thats race of the setting its taking in. Forget the music and forget Yasuke, even if they didn't use Lockley's fictional story Ubisoft will be still under heavy fire for their lack of effort in researching the tradition, culture and architecture of Japan, had they hired an actual Japanese culture and History consultant this could have been negated. Why was Ghost of Tsushima successful and loved by the Japanese while Shadows is under heavy fire even though the game is not out yet? its cause the dev of GoT put in the effort on researching the tradition and culture of Japan and they made sure not to disrespect the people they are basing the game on, Ubisoft ignored all that and went for 'their version' of Japanese history.
nonono, you’re right. ubisoft is at fault but did any of us expect Ubisoft to make a good game??? this is like putting in team of bulbasaur to fill in for the squirtle squad. i’ve heard about some other historical inaccuracies that have nothing to do w Yasuke and those are bad obvs. but i think a lot of people are more furious about yasuke being a samurai when that should probably be directed more towards tom and the university of Nihon. i dont expect dumb people to make smart decisions yk?
and as for “their version” yes dude, it’s assassin’s creed. we dont want real history, we want fake history set in a real place
bingo! They wanted to believe it so bad they ignored facts
I don’t care what your school book say, my grandma said Black Samurai’s were real! /s
Yasuke was a real person, but wasn’t a big person, just like how Leonardo davinchi didnt create weapons for a secret organisation of ninjas
yeah, assassin's creed hid the historical accuracy in the golden apple puzzles
@@hazyhezzy Shieeeeet fr fr on god bro?
no like im so deadass they literally map out the financial incentives behind the iraq war and NAFTA and the history of US and Russias relationship after the fall of the soviet union
@@hazyhezzy Ey Mang dat shit krazy, we finna bussin fr fr
There’s a big issue with even the word Samurai in this context.
Samurai back then was a more specific title, but belonging to the warrior caste, something we would today consider to be in line with the image of samurai, is called Bushi. Yasuke was almost undoubtedly a Bushi, or warrior, but to say samurai in this context is problematic, to use the DEI-crowds own words against them.
The problem with adding hip hop to the game is because of the racial stereotypes. Yasuke isn’t African-American. He’s from Africa, and he wouldn’t have any connection at all to hip hop, and we know they added it because he’s black, because there’s no hip hop to be seen elsewhere so far, especially not when Naoe is fighting. If there had been hip hop during Naoe’s scenes, we could deduce that it’s a general vibe of the game, but it’s specific to Yasuke, which means it was made to invoke racial stereotypes, AKA they did it because they’re racist and thought all black people listen to hip hop.
The reason it works in champloo is because of the general vibe in the show and because they’re not highlighting this as connected to black people. It’s a goofy show about samurai where everything is a little modernised and reimagined with hip hop culture inserted to Japanese fiction. When something actually happened, they go in to detail and explore it, and when it’s just for fun, they don’t deep dive into the history.
Also, Nujabes is Japanese.
i didnt read all this but yeah no shit nujabes is japanese. i aint no ordinary joe
@@hazyhezzy haha! Great reference! Might be my favourite song!
Ubisoft is no fucking victim. This whole video reeks of "Leave the multi-million dollar company alone". They weren't tricked, people with zero interest in history or any acumen in it managed to find out this whole idea of yasuke being some legendary samurai figure was a fucking joke and yet i am supposed to believe that poor ubisoft with all it's money and resources couldn't detect this lie. They knew it was a lie, They just didn't care because DEI and ESG and Wokeness. They couldn't even get the time period specific things right, like the Japanese Kanji or architecture. UBISOFT is not a victim of anything other than their own hubris. Thomas Lockley was and will always be a scammer, everyone saw that.
And as for the music, for me, it's not even one of the major flaws, cuz both protagonists should have been Japanese to begin with, however, if it was a good choice for the poor decision of putting a random african man in samurai armor in feudal japan, why not play African Music. And before anyone says it, Yasuke is from Mozambique and yes we know what their music at the time sounded like, just like most other parts of africa.
i get that, my issue was a lot of the critique i saw about the music was just as shallow as “haha why would they put rap music in the game thats dumb” and i thought that was kind of dumb. i agree, obviously ubisoft is responsible for this dumb decision but like, i dont expect much from the objectively floundering company. they suck lmao. i dont think they should get off with this one but it seems like a pretty logical decision to use someone like Yasuke for this kind of game and then when a guy comes along who is literally a professor in japanese history at the university of nihon, why would the scummy company not take advantage of this too good to be true “coincidence” (probably a better word but ykwim). but like i said, there’s no excuse for the mistakes that don’t have to do with the music. my issue was only that people were saying the choice to use it was dumb, when if you take ubisoft as ignorant and dumb instead of malicious, the choice to use hip-hop isn’t bad. everything else is kinda rage bait tbh. hope you weren’t too offended, i hope ubisoft burns to the ground over what it did to assassins creed a long time ago, i just didn’t want to see rap go with it. i think ultimately we have the same opinion, you just know a lot more about the topic and i was just reacting to people acting like their music critiques were really important. also the neflix show exists, i think im right that people should be more focused on this guy bc clearly not everyone knew he was a scammer. i legit thought he was a mysterious swordsman who might’ve been a samurai until this happened, thanks for providing some more context tho.
@@hazyhezzy
"who is literally a professor in japanese history at the university of nihon"
He is NOT a professor of history. He is just an English teacher there.
What Ubisoft here just did is asking someone who fits their own agenda.
Meanwhile, the real researchers such as Goza Yûichi who have a relevant degree and are actually knowledgeable about history for that era have more or less the same opinion on the subject Yasuke.
There are just a very few primary sources on the topic.
And only one of them which happens to be a handwritten copy from 1719 of another book which is known as the Nobunaga Chronicles that was burnt during a fire is only giving hints on his status. However, this source does not even use the word Samurai. It says he got a sword as well as a name, a stipend and a house, which would suggest this status.
But judging by this kind of quality of the source it is based on, while the other copies don't even mention Yasuke, it is highly unlikely that this is valid.
In anyways, as Goza states in his article and where I just take the fredom to copy it here:
弥助が武士（侍）に取り立てられたという説の根拠は、尊経閣文庫本『信長公記』のみであり、弥助を「黒人のサムライ」と断定するのには慎重であるべきではないだろうか。
Or in English:
the basis for the theory that Yasuke has been promoted to Warrior (Samurai) is exclusively to find in the Sonkekaku-edition of the Nobunagakôki and therefore shouldn't one be careful to draw the conclusion of Yasuke being a "black Samurai"?
(Sorry if my English is not good, but this is roughly what he states).
Source: agora-web.jp/archives/240721081916.html
what legendary samurai? xd you even twisting their words for it to sounds wrong... this is exacly missinformation people making, on main page you have frome the start that it is yasuke frome historical legends... Nothing about historical accuracy
They said that they will tell story about historical character yasuke, that in their story become samurai under nobunaga...
You guys are copin so hard xd
yo we can post links here now??? noice. thank you for all of this info, i was under the impression he was a history professor, i saw in his bio this was the case but i went to university and can definitely see him having taught a class or been involved with the department in some way yet that isn’t his actual background. thank you for the source, im definitely going to do some more reading on this.
yo we can post links here now??? noice. thank you for all of this info, i was under the impression he was a history professor, i saw in his bio this was the case but i went to university and can definitely see him having taught a class or been involved with the department in some way yet that isn’t his actual background. thank you for the source, im definitely going to do some more reading on this.
It's a work of fiction. I don't personally care whether they take liberties with it. They transformed many other historical figures into members of secret sects and cults possessing borderline magical powers. If that isn't a sign that they're not trying to be historically accurate, I don't know what is. If people want to complain, they're welcome to. I just don't see the argument for accuracy, realism, or proper representation to be a proper argument for said complaints or dislike. It's more like a pretext to me.
You're totally right, from the music to the historical fiction from the games, the problem is nowadays we can't have anything just be fun anymore. It HAS to be polarized, ex: God of War 1 is clearly a Black inspired character voiced by a Black man and even the look is such - no one cares cuz it was COOL. Now we have to have reality reflected back to us for some reason and we are the poorer for it.
there was no reason to build this up as such an historically accurate “return to form” should’ve just stayed quiet and cook in private smh
There's a difernce between being inspired and going on that into a fantasy while keeping some elements of realism to make a good balance like samurai champlo and for some unexplainable reason isnsit in using a historical figure and then insinting on rewriting history. they insisted, the directors insinted that's it's historically accurate,
this all could’ve been so easily avoided smh
C'mon, Ubisoft knew exactly what they were doing.
nah, assuming this was intentional is assuming that the people in charge know what they’re doing. they’re idiots. dev team says “hey lets make historical fiction” marketing exec finds out about lockley (or vice versa) next thing you know, they’re being idiots publicly. i think they’re too dumb or incompetent or both
@@hazyhezzy That's fair.
My primary issue really isn't with Yasuke, he is a real figure, and as a character in a video game, I would want him to be a little exaggerated. However, combined with the aesthetic inaccuracies of Japan at that time, the fact that I am "playing" as Yasuke is the issue. While I don't know 100%, it does not sound like, other than stealth, Yasuke will be restricted to anything. I don't think Ubisoft can write the nuances of playing a real life historical figure, no matter how obscure, into AC. Seeing him as a primary npc, working closely with him would be a welcomed way to get ubisofts message across, without disrespecting anyone's culture.
there was 100% a way to do this game in a respectful way and include all of the fictional/fantasy elements we all would’ve enjoyed playing. like if the ghost of tsushima team did this, probably no issue
@hazyhezzy I agree with you 100%. It's a fine line to walk when talking about history, even historical fiction, GoT received plenty of flack for being a "white studio" handling Japanese culture, but hindsight is always 20/20. I hope my concerns will be proven wrong, or at least exacerbated. I have played and enjoyed every AC for its own merits, and I intend to play this one. I do hope they take the criticism, especially from Japanese gamers, seriously, even if they don't openly acknowledge it.
so Ubisoft stealing intellectual properties makes them a victim?
LMAO
when did i ever say that?
AC's never really been under this much heat. The games have been historically accurate to a certain extent. They've always been Historical Fantasy games. Blending science fiction and what if stories. There has to be a layer of disbelief. Yasuke being black isn't really an issue, in fact I find it a good opportunity to allow the player to play as a historical figure. The problem lies within Ubisoft's lack of care for the Japanese culture, placing real life historical reenactment banners thinking they were real, and I have a personal issue with Ubisoft using AI to generate the world etc. I think Alissa Ralph shot herself in the foot when she chose Yasuke as the Samurai protagonist. Simply because we don't know if he was, he was given a plot of land, and certain privileges given towards the Samurai class, but nowhere is it ever explicitly stated. The Nobunaga period of Japan is an era filled with exceptions and mystery. I'd highly recommend studying the topic and coming to your own conclusion, unlike a majority of people who seemingly think they're correct. Keep up the good work!
If you believed this game was gonna be histically accurate then its pretty much all on you if you get upset.
Historcally accurate in gaming means:
1. set during a spesific historical period, place an/or events
2: using historical figures/people.
It does not mean that the game is an accurate representation of real world history.
the only real beef they have is that they said stuff was true that they didn’t need to. if they specifically said their take on yasuke was just their fantasy, this wouldn’t be part of the convo. just the normal japanese stuff they got wrong
@@hazyhezzy if an historian came and said that it was historical accurate then i'd agree to some critisism of that historian but these are game devs, their job is literally to create a fictional world, it doesn't matter if they get some things right and other things wrong, its clear that the game is set in japan and that makes it "close enough" cause its still not real world.
the problem is that people get really upset about things that just dont matter, i say we all wait till the game is out so we can know if the game is good or bad
fair point, thats kind of my argument about ubisoft being a victim, i dont think any of the actual people working on this intended it to be taken the way it has. i think the marketing team was conned by a con man and then that opens the door to a bunch of valid criticisms and invalid ones all being levied at a developer who has not been known for its carefully well thought out game design and world building for at least a decade now
Bro they are woke they wanted ti believe it. They have the resources to vet this they choose not too because it fits their propaganda views. Not knowing you committed a crime does NOT exempt you from the charges. Now the music is not reflective of the time. You are all over the map with your arguments
no, i just have two arguments. one is that ubisofts decision to include the music was probably done in good faith. the other is that they got scammed by a guy thats been doing this for years. ig the point thats not clear is that i hate this company for what it did to this series a long time ago so the expectation they were going to create something good is silly to begin with. i dont think they would’ve professed yasukes historical accuracy without lockleys involvement. obviously they take the blame byron, but in your example of criminal conviction, the state of mind and motive are a big factor in determining sentencing. i am suggesting that ubisoft as a company is too stupid to not get scammed, thus some of the blame towards them would be better directed at the mechanisms that have allowed this guy to grift off of this for nearly a decade.
Ubisoft is not a victim, they know what they are doing and deliberately hiring foreign born Japanese and white man with vague credentials to make authentic feudal Japan settings is like hiring Taylor Swift to engineer a skyscraper.
i would say tswizz is more capable of engineering a skyscraper than ubisoft is of making a good game these days. i dont expect high quality outputs from low quality inputs
I see no problem with this game. I’m from Brazil, have you ever seen how Brazil is represented in games? Nothing like reality. And thats ok, for games are not bound to reality. They’re supposed to be fun, and a character being black or not, samurai or not, won’t influence my enjoyment if the game is good
i think the real issue is, is ubisoft said it was reality. but you make a good point.
Well, i do agree regarding Ubislop are a victim as well when talking about Yasuke history, but doesn't mean they are also clean either.
There are indeed the failure of source material, but yet again, its also their fault to hired questionable people as fact and reference checker for everything in the game. They are guilty for hiring questionable people while keep saying "Historical Research and Accuracy" even if you are quoting what Benoit dud said. Eventhough they are retract (Not really sorry) arguments.
Do we suddenly forget what this company do for the last year alone to us, a customer ? No, i don't think they are clean either, infact they are very dirty IMO.
oh they are very dirty, the framing was kind of click bait but ig i didnt make it clear enough that i hate this company. i just didn’t like the “why would u add hiphop hurr” criticisms. this is a company run by children in suits, i didn’t expect much.
We already have Origins and it was great. We don’t need We WuZ Samurai
bro im literally black, stop it. he’s a real person, the issue is they claimed his samurai past was real instead of just keeping it historical fiction like its always been
@@hazyhezzy The comment you are responding 2 doesn't argue weather Yasuke was a real person or not, so ur response isn't applicable.
@@Wolpher im not about to really get into that deeply with someone dog whistling in my comments. edit: if you don’t know the dog whistle, he was arguing that we didn’t need a game with Yasuke *at all* which i think is debatable bc it would be an interesting concept and could be well done.
@@hazyhezzy and I’m half black. I can see when they are pandering for clout points and when they are being creative. This is sad. The best assassin is one that is unseen. Not someone that sticks out. Black history has enough source material to pull from rather than grift on another culture.
All of it doesn't matter, ubisoft didn't said it's historically accurate, they didn't said their game will be ( and never was anyway ) + it's game, no historical book xd where people crying about old ac games? Wolfenstein? Sniper elite? Battlefield? ect.
those games didn’t imply a historical accuracy that wasn’t there, don’t simp
for the clearly bad company.
@@hazyhezzy ,,those games didn’t imply a historical accuracy that wasn’t there'' true they don;t, thats exacly my point xd so you simping for bad company? xd becasue you agree with it not being historicaly accurate... xd becasue they aren;t, you have ,,aliens'' and their technology there :c frome 1 part to now ac shadows xd
i genuinely don’t think you understood a word i said. but thank you for engaging.
@@hazyhezzy tell me you can't make argument, without telling me that.... >
Tell me you work for Ubisoft without telling me you work for Ubisoft......
buddy i dont have a JOB and as we speak im going to an interview right now
Well its ubisoft fault for not recognizing that any information you get, need different sources to back up your claim. You can't be making false claim in the game, even one japanese youtuber said "This environment is not like japan at all". Ubisoft games have taken some historical elements but made them loosely base, because beside Yasuke no one was questioning Ubisoft game till Mirage. They didn't like the graphics, changing of the original story, and probably it was tied with Bassim as being loki yada yada.
yeah m8 i said all of those criticisms are valid but my argument is- ubisoft is a dumb bad company, they did not do the research, ofc they didn’t. so from that standpoint is including “hip-hop influenced” music in the game the bad choice i say that ive seen people make it out to be? i say no. bc it makes sense if you’re a stupid company and wouldve been a fine decision if the implementation of everything was done to a higher standard.
umm dude you're taking this backwards, Ubisoft look for HIM and even HE told them in an interview that his satatus as samurai lacks concrete proof, maybe do actual research, Ubisoft was not scammed they wanted this DEI nonsense since day one, proof the matter is that the used a USA female professor with japanese descent (not even japanese) who specializes on seeking gay stories on sengoku period texts as the main reference for Japanese Culture and History, I'm not kidding she made a book on that, on finding stories or outright changing the meanings of sengoku period texts where monks, warriors and nobles would have sex with underage boys, that's the level of care they have for the Japanese culture, the point of the matter is that forget he was samurai, the very fact Yasuke was real is a historical revisionist wet dream and Thomas or not, Ubisoft would've used him, they knew exactly what they were doing.
Oh and the music is a problem in it on itself because all these people that claim to be all about inclusion, how they're above objectification of women yet they make super buff shirtless men, how they're above tokenism, yet they choose to show their black character with dreadlocks and fighting to a hip hop beat, it's a problem because it's hipocritical plain and simple.
As a bonus I just hate people defending this game with the "Assassin's creed was never historically accurate" BULLSH*T!!! yes we all know there were no apples of eden, Leonardo didn't make gadgets for assassins, blah, blah, blah, but they WERE RESPECTFUL TO HISTORY DAMMIT!!! Blackbeard's last stand, Lorenzo de Medici's assassination attempt, the Lisbon earthquake, Paul Revere's ride, the storming of la Vastille, all real historical events, AC has always woven it's narrative around actual historical events and they've mostly been very detailed about them, to the point were they used their 3D model to repair Notre Dame, and the most recent game Mirage were Baghdad was so faithfully recreated it reportedly made a historian weep, Ubisoft has no excuse for it's square tatamis or burning incense on shinto shrines, they simply don't care about this specific culture.
so take two steps back and look at the title, its literally the “um, actually” meme. i know ubisoft is bad, its a bad company. i never expected them to make good decisions. i did a little research but im not heavily invested in this. look at my sub count and my channel, i did this for engagement m8. thats why i dont go into detail on anything, im not a valid source. read the comments, read the pinned comment. nothing you said here i haven’t addressed. people have given me a wealth of actually useful knowledge with sources. ive read some of it, i know more now. but this video does not need to give you this reaction. i hate ubisoft, i hate what they did to assassin’s creed a long time ago. i was there for the ezio trilogy, i was there for AC3. i did the eden puzzles. i love seeing ubisoft flounder, i just think its weird so much of the criticism was on music choice and not this guy being around for nearly a decade
Gotta be kidding me if you think I'd believe y'all are genuinely angry as if this is an academic travesty for you ppl. If people actually cared about historical accuracy or faithfulness, movies like Ridley Scott's Napoleon would never had happened.
Gamers, famously the least sophisticated of media consumers, would rather make this political before they'd ever admit that video game writing has ALWAYS been particularly abysmal.
The gameplay showcase felt almost like satire. A black dude happily wandering around Japan, shooting the breeze about 'freeing the people' and 'giving freedom and justice'. Such washed out Western tropes. Dude then murders some Japanese sicarios like pancakes and everything is so colourful and pretty again? It's absurd.
Ubisoft writers, like every writers for most modern video games, lack any semblance of creativity, finesse and subtlety. They have checklists and fulfill them. Assassins Creed had always had crappy writing since AC Rogue. They are all vapid, meaningless, juvenile yet serviceable enough to pump out and keep a gamer occupied for 5 hours.
So why is it suddenly such a big deal? Why are gamers fronting as if theyve ever harboured any standards in their lives? Because now they can do so under a political veil.
Anyone who tries to tell me that this controversy is a big deal and worth paying mind to, are lying to themselves. They have nothing better to do, and they aren't intelligent enough to gauge bad writing without the support of political undercurrents.
it really is hard to believe that people genuinely thought that this game was going to groundbreaking. so its hard to be mad that the bad company did a bad thing in game that if past is prologue, is probably also going to be mid at best.
you said he got tricked by this "professor", yet you kind of forget there is literally an entire team of Japanese UBI staff in Tokyo, who actually know Japanese and Japanese history, rather doing that they believed a translated "know that if it is true or not" publication and wikipedia
3:14 you said why judge people who have credential? so if a physician say gravity is actually going upwards you will not judge them? no this is not how it is done, any new discovery, whether if it is from a hobbyist or professional, shall be judge, the only difference is there are slightly less judgement becuase of the credential and people believe in professional ethics to be in place.
4:22 the show is in Netflix argumnent does not stand for the following reason：1） it is out loud it is in alternate reality, 2) it is not in the japanese tv channel (note that if you live in japan anime are on tv) 3)it is so not that popular (2021 and 2022 people are too hyped in Jujutsu Kaisen and Demon Slayer) most likely it has been all under the radar
your point about my netflix argument is kind of my point, this wouldn’t have been an issue if they didn’t profess his role was historically accurate. my point about credentials is that literally there is an entire profit model handing out “credentials” if im a ubisoft marketing exec, the credentials this guy has probably is all i look at. ubisoft didn’t care about this game and they got scammed. but i never and i cant believe anyone else thought ubisoft was a company who cared about their games that much. also a physician wouldn’t be able to credibly tell me that, you mean a physicist. and obviously not bc gravity is something that i can feel right here right now, its not something that has conflicting accounts and is highly debated anymore. notice i say i have no issue with the criticism over the other historical inaccuracies in the game. elsewhere in this comments section you can find me saying that i believe the inclusion of yasuke started as fantasy and some guy came along and said “no actually all this stuff is real”
@@hazyhezzy the point I'm making is they are doing they are not familiar with, and instead of getting their Japanese local staff who has basic knowledge to start off the research process and they use the research result, they go bluntly and get a book to get ideas.
You say they are the victim and should not blame them but I would disagree, due to the above-mentioned reason.
i said they were scammed. they literally were. im confused as to how this man was even allowed to publish this book like this, i say in the video ubisoft is bad. their incompetence got taken advantage of lmao but like you said there are way more reasons to be upset than his inclusion alone
1:40 i cried laughing at this part so thats how i feel about the music
imagine if they used WuTang lmfao
unironically if they used RZA for this it probably would’ve went insane. OST of the year easy
To be fair i hated the music theme in Samurai Shamploo.
you’re a different kind of monster but i respect you a great deal for saying this so boldly. you’re nuts tho
@@hazyhezzy hahaha. I just am never a fan of that kind of anachronism, it always breaks my sense of immersion in the story. But I realise I'm most likely in the minority here. Still loved the show in general though 😏
you know what…. thats a really fair argument when you put it that way in the context of the show, i can see that. sometimes those record scratches are jarring
Glad my point made sense 😁
ill play it if the game is fun 🗿
see now, THAT is the question… and knowing ubisoft… i think we know the answer
What misinformation and bad company does to a game
you hate to see it smh
He wuz gay and samurai.
Ubi is always guilty.
I will NEVER buy a Ubishit product ever again!
please don’t, if we stop, we might get the bad executives kicked and bring back some people who actually care about making good games
Its ubisoft problem also.
Cus They say that this game is historycali accuarte
ya but its not hard to imagine they genuinely believed it, the guy is literally a professor of japanese history
they've never once claimed that the people and events in their games are historically accurate. the AC franchise has always had mystical powers and otherworldly beings lmao