Some Awesome Insulation Details on this BC Passive House!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024
  • This British Columbia Passive House has some insulation details I’ve never seen before including a 2’ thick sub-slab raft, ICF Flood Hardy first floor walls, and an attic strategy I’ve never heard of. I was impressed. Comment below on what you thought was the most interesting feature of this Build! This is my final video from that amazing tour I took last December.
    Mike Van Capelle
    Blue Water Concepts Ltd.
    bluewaterconce...
    Instagram: @blue_water_concepts_ltd
    Facebook: @BlueWaterConcepts
    Passive House Consultant
    Pierre-Andre Santin
    mizupassivehou...
    Big thanks to:
    Siga www.siga.swiss...
    Innotech Windows www.innotech-w... and
    QuadLock ICF www.quadlock.com/
    for sponsoring my High Performance Building tour of Vancouver BC Canada
    Check out www.driduck.com/ and use code RISINGERBUILD for 15% off. I'm wearing the APEX Jacket
    Follow Matt on Instagram! / risingerbuild
    or Twitter / mattrisinger
    Huge thanks to our Show sponsors Polywall, Huber, Dorken Delta, Prosoco, Rockwool & Viewrail for helping to make these videos possible! These are all trusted companies that Matt has worked with for years and trusts their products in the homes he builds. We would highly encourage you to check out their websites for more info.
    www.Poly-Wall.com
    www.Dorken.com
    www.Huberwood.com
    www.Prosoco.com
    www.Viewrail.com
    www.Rockwool.com

Комментарии • 421

  • @bartlevenson7851
    @bartlevenson7851 2 года назад +8

    Dear Matt, I love watching these videos. I knew a man in northern Vermont that had a 100% passive house that never needed his backup heater in five years, even though outside temps. went as low as minus 35 F. Not even a hair dryer needed! How did he do it? First of all, he used very thick foam block insulation all around , above and below his home for a super high R- value. Next, he had a huge triple glazed south facing window to gain him a lot of solar heat all day long. This sunlight hit a thick slab of black slate about 10 feet behind the long window in the back of his long, shallow living room, and was in the center of the house, with his bedrooms on the other side. At sunset, he lowered a huge, clamshell awning / cover for his giant picture window, so that on the sub- zero nights his R-9 window went to R-40+ because of the insulated cover over the picture window. So he had windows for the daytime, and battened down the hatches with window cranks at dark when there was nothing to see in the winter. In addition, he got electricity from solar all day, and by a wind turbine all night. These were stored in a 1900 pound submarine battery in his basement and he ran lights off 12 volts, and had an inverter for some 110 volt appliances. He had a strange gas powered refrigerator that used a propane tank he had refilled in town. He was completely off grid, near Stowe Vermont. Said the U. of Vermont would send engineers sometimes to see what he had accomplished. I was impressed! I live in a totally uninsulated condo in Los Angeles, and I am freezing inside when it is 63 degrees outside, as I have single pane R- 0.2 floor to ceiling windows on my whole exterior. I wish I had the comfort and energy savings of smart design!

  • @jbweezer
    @jbweezer 4 года назад +15

    Loving all your recent pieces on all things about Canadian construction! Keep it up!

  • @dumbdumber1885
    @dumbdumber1885 4 года назад +16

    Built in a river bed on a "raft" lol. Makes total sense.

    • @adamheron7796
      @adamheron7796 4 года назад

      I bet ya it floats> even with the concrete.

    • @chriscook1468
      @chriscook1468 4 года назад

      I built a 15 unit residential over commercial building on land that was considered liquefaction land. I had to dig out and pour a "Matt" slab of 24 inches, (1,200 yards), to keep it from being swallowed up on the next big California quake. LOL. That was an expensive build. I like this structural foam concept. I bet I could of used 1 foot of structural foam and 1 foot of slab to get the same effect. Need to run the calc's on that.

    • @longbeachdub420
      @longbeachdub420 3 года назад

      @@its.free.realestate hey, I think they said they brought in lots of feet worth of boulders before the crush/foam/slab. My whole neighborhood is subject to overland seasonal water (non/flowing) and it’s all good, pier and beam or vented crawl space. I’m guessing they are above the high water mark and just need feet that can get wet

  • @dinakhrabsheh4144
    @dinakhrabsheh4144 2 года назад +2

    wow!! this is so informative. I am an architect from Jordan, we build passive differently because we use concrete structures instead of wood. But I moved to BC now and I am fascinated by these new building technologies.

  • @MostlyPeacefulCombatVet
    @MostlyPeacefulCombatVet 4 года назад +6

    Most intense sub slab and attic/roof detail I've ever seen. We don't have winters quite like that being in zone 4a. But if we insulate even half of what they did there, it's considered a superior build here..
    I've not seen an envelope done like that either. It looks involved, but simple at the same time. Very interesting. I'd like to see how they run the mechanicals and address penetrations in that home also..
    At any rate, there is no way they won't meet and/or exceed passive house assuming the window and door, and penetrations are addressed correctly. I couldn't imagine it anyway.
    Thanks for the content 👍

    • @dubCanuck1
      @dubCanuck1 4 года назад +2

      It's Whistler. It's the "Florida" of Canadian cold. It gets damp and yeah, cold too, so that insulation isn't strictly required for thermal purposes. I think as much as anything it's an engineering exercise and showcase for the builder and the products. I like the roof though. I'm storing that idea for my upcoming ICF build.

  • @robthewaywardwoodworker9956
    @robthewaywardwoodworker9956 2 года назад +2

    Just in case you thought your house cost too much per square foot... there's this one. Holy cow, that's the most intense over-build I've ever seen. That is just an exercise in chasing numbers. But cool on them for trying such a grand experiment.

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад +1

      It's not really an over-build given where the house is located and the aim for it to be heated passively, i.e. no active heating (no hair-dryer).

  • @lovejcdc
    @lovejcdc 4 года назад +15

    Holy freakin crapola lol R100! That's insane lol I never thought I would ever see a R100 anything lol

    • @hailexiao2770
      @hailexiao2770 4 года назад +3

      I could definitely see R100 attics in a passive house in inland Alaska.

    • @lovejcdc
      @lovejcdc 4 года назад

      @@hailexiao2770 absolutely

  • @jt5747
    @jt5747 4 года назад +91

    Matt, you should re-tear down your Austin build and do this instead.

    • @TheIcyhydra
      @TheIcyhydra 4 года назад +8

      insulation have diminishing return from investments

    • @rakashaagain
      @rakashaagain 4 года назад +5

      Passive is mostly usefull for cold climate and not sure if it would be cost effective for hot climate.

    • @ryanroberts1104
      @ryanroberts1104 4 года назад +8

      @@TheIcyhydra Matt Risinger has diminishing returns from investments. It was a joke.

    • @TheIcyhydra
      @TheIcyhydra 4 года назад +1

      @@rakashaagain there's a climate called "temperate climate" that's when you are near the sea and the difference in temperature from winter and summer is lowered compared to more dry areas.

    • @rakashaagain
      @rakashaagain 4 года назад +1

      @@TheIcyhydra yea colder area. Thatsy exactly ehat I said

  • @alteragnostik
    @alteragnostik 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much for this kind of videos, Matt! Here in Ukraine we have similar climate, and these enginneering solutions inspire a lot.

  • @crankysister
    @crankysister 4 года назад +1

    Yay! As a Michigander, I am so happy to see you doing some content on northern builds!

    • @michaelharris9981
      @michaelharris9981 3 года назад

      Can you imagine a house like that here in Michigan. WOW

  • @jameshutchins3396
    @jameshutchins3396 4 года назад +2

    Wow! This would be wonderful in texas on red clay. Love it

  • @scottcraig1047
    @scottcraig1047 4 года назад +2

    Insulated Concrete Form construction is becoming my favorite build method. I would like to see more videos on this.

    • @dlorien7306
      @dlorien7306 4 года назад

      In a way, that's good, because ICFs have a lot of advantages over sticks. In a way, that's bad, because usually (not always) AAC is a superior option, it's just not as widely known or marketed, in the US & Canada (it's all over Mexico, Japan, Europe, India, etc.). I think foam = technology = it must be great

    • @canonicaltom
      @canonicaltom 3 года назад

      Let me know how I can get R60 with AAC without using foam.

  • @HistoricHomePlans
    @HistoricHomePlans 4 года назад +1

    Impressive! Whistler is obviously an extreme climate. Before people rush off and start tripling their insulation I just wanted to point out that in less severe climates there are definitely diminishing returns as far as adding insulation. Green Building Advisor has some articles on the subject.

  • @ToIsleOfView
    @ToIsleOfView 2 года назад +2

    I really like these custom builds that showcase super insulation and/or special foundation features. As a follower of passive design, I saw the demise of underground homes and greenhouse homes. Adobe mud was a hip thing and then rammed earth & straw bales. The only thing that has lasted is building a conventional living space and then super-insulating it to reduce the total cost of heating and cooling. The use of light tubes can also reduce the amount of electrical lighting required. I distinctly remember the architect that built a passive house where winter sun streamed into the tiled kitchen and she stored that solar energy as heat in the mass of the floor but when she lived in the house she got tired of having to wear sunglasses in her kitchen every winter day. I think we have learned the house must be comfortable to actually live in and not just save energy. The commercial construction industry has some great architects that seek net zero. I don't like any of the nonsense about using recycled materials. I like the idea of a house with a 500-year lifespan.

    • @JL10007406
      @JL10007406 Год назад +1

      Agreed. The need to use recycled materials is irrelevant when the structure is designed to last 200+ years.

  • @simonjoshua1710
    @simonjoshua1710 4 года назад +10

    Love the content, Matt! I had trouble hearing your guests, though.

    • @buildshow
      @buildshow  4 года назад +6

      I have a hard time mic’ing up three people. I’ll continue to work on audio. It’s always been my toughest yet most important part of making videos

    • @R0yL33
      @R0yL33 4 года назад +2

      @@buildshow sub-titles for your guests only in this case would be good enough.

    • @simonjoshua1710
      @simonjoshua1710 4 года назад

      @@buildshow The content value makes up for occasional flukes like this. Thanks for what you do!

  • @kyleedooley7970
    @kyleedooley7970 3 года назад

    That should be a standard in building. Right on 👍

  • @snoozeuloozetv1562
    @snoozeuloozetv1562 4 года назад +1

    Wow what a house. Love the build quality

  • @peterscherling6594
    @peterscherling6594 3 года назад

    Eblankets guys it's super cheap radiant blanket that can be glued to the inside of foam on the 4 sides of a house! Also foam cement mix has an incredible insulation value for under the cement floor for radiant heating but add an emergency blanket and wala!

  • @je-fq7ve
    @je-fq7ve 4 года назад +1

    Hey Matt, @ 6:11 that carpenter is mooning us.

  • @pwashcroft
    @pwashcroft 4 года назад +1

    Looks like the ICF was so much easier than the rest. Probably better sealed too.

  • @emmanuelgutierrez8616
    @emmanuelgutierrez8616 4 года назад +2

    I think the future will be full of "big black box" construction with fo-windows that are actually monitors.

    • @khandam7709
      @khandam7709 2 года назад

      nope people dont' wnat to live in the matrix.

  • @jeffreyroberts5530
    @jeffreyroberts5530 4 года назад +1

    awesome...this foundation technique would work in Canmore and Banff with their respective floodplains in the eclectic downtown area

  • @PrivateUsername
    @PrivateUsername 4 года назад +22

    So Matt, speaking of windows - have you seen people move to using two windows (an outside and inside) for some of these 12"+ thick walls? A place I stayed in Italy years ago did this, and I've not seen it stateside.

    • @teekay1785
      @teekay1785 4 года назад +5

      @eyeonfish It probably would not do this if the outermost window is sealed well from infiltration and multipane and inner window single pane or multipane with small "breather holes" similar to old style exterior storm windows. The breathable hole might allow just enough air exchange to avoid that or alternatively go for super sealed multipane windows on inside also basically space between the two windows acts just like a multilane window

    • @davidnielsen4490
      @davidnielsen4490 4 года назад +6

      More than likely, each of those sash was single pane glazing rather than insulating glass. There has to be some airflow between the two windows otherwise there would develop condensation. I was in the window business from 1962 until 1993 and saw several installation in construction from the 1800s that had a swing out casement window on the outside and a swing in French window on the inside especially in Northern Wisconsin and Minnesota. The old timers of that day said the ideal space between the sash was 4".

    • @davidnielsen4490
      @davidnielsen4490 4 года назад +2

      Information for eyeonfish. Glass doesn't delaminate. What happens is there is seal failure. The two layers of glass are held apart by a metal extrusion that has a membrane that is applied to the glass to form a seal. Today's windows with Low Emissity films applied to one lite of glass or both sides of glass to increase the R value of the window unit. On the new construction on my home, we are using casement window units with a double layer of low E.

    • @teekay1785
      @teekay1785 4 года назад

      @eyeonfish very true

    • @teekay1785
      @teekay1785 4 года назад

      @@davidnielsen4490 Yes you are probably right . More or less a storm window with a larger insulating air space between the panes . I am sure the outside window was swing out casement for a couple of reasons . They may have needed to meet code for egress and to insure the best seal.
      Also remember if the window had much sun exposure in daytime the space between was likely warmer than the interior air.
      Condensation forms when air temp between layers is below the due point for that humidity level generally by contact with the outer colder glass. The reason modern multilane windows dont condense or fog is they are sealed with dry gas between the layers could be argon or even just dry air.
      One reason older storm type windows or the two window setup dont condense easier is that most heating methods (not an open flame) lower the humidity indoors so the air has a lower due point.

  • @johnleeyingzhang3504
    @johnleeyingzhang3504 4 года назад

    Thanks for coming to canada Matt. Please do more videos of builds in canada.

  • @ToIsleOfView
    @ToIsleOfView 2 года назад +1

    Matt could you reference the bang for the buck more often. Also, the KISS philosophy that can reduce mistakes that cost the builder money.

  • @deejohnson5163
    @deejohnson5163 3 года назад

    Hope you bring us back to see it finished.

  • @HeWearsGlasses
    @HeWearsGlasses 4 года назад +6

    I started laughing when he said 100 r value, that's crazy lol

    • @fredio54
      @fredio54 4 года назад +2

      It's only 17.6 in metric. Does that make you feel better? :-D 5.67826 is the ratio. Took me a few videos to realise that when I started watching these yank vids :-D

  • @paullocke4609
    @paullocke4609 3 года назад +11

    Love the high R factor insulation. I can't help wondering exactly how the house is "attached" to the ground while sitting on top of 22" of structural foam? Gravity?

    • @Alex-lc1bv
      @Alex-lc1bv 3 года назад +10

      Plenty of gravity with all of that concrete. You have to remember that even the ground itself is attached to deeper ground with gravity.

    • @RoscoeDaMule
      @RoscoeDaMule 2 года назад +1

      @@Alex-lc1bv lol str8 facts

    • @peteolesen265
      @peteolesen265 2 года назад +1

      I am not an engineer so take what I say with a grain of salt. I would be concerned in a flood relying on gravity alone to secure the house in place. I have seen footage of houses literally swept away in floods. The lateral forces are immense. I think in coastal areas with sand they put down piers and build on that.
      I am sure an engineer approved this design and it meets code, so likely is OK. It just looks “unachored” somehow.

    • @davidh9368
      @davidh9368 2 года назад

      @@peteolesen265 And there was that reference to the "raft slab", hopefully that is not a foreshadowing of future events.

    • @davidh9368
      @davidh9368 2 года назад

      we buy really dense foam for CNC mold forms that at 20-40lbs/ft3 is still able to float. 6 in 4x8 sheet needs a forklift.

  • @TerryPullen
    @TerryPullen 4 года назад +10

    You could heat this house with a candle.

    • @brettmoore3194
      @brettmoore3194 3 года назад

      Maybe new graphene based infrared heaters best heat for the wattage

  • @garvincentcia5873
    @garvincentcia5873 4 года назад

    thats the type of foam used under sea barrages used to ride on them during floods when I was little in Northern Virginia pentomic river

  • @atlanteum
    @atlanteum Год назад +1

    What the heck is goin' on with the edit at 04:55 when Matt is projecting his voice like a ventriloquist to Pierre?? [GREAT episode, by the way!]

  • @michaelmccloskey3341
    @michaelmccloskey3341 4 года назад +2

    Did I mention I live in a yeti cooler? This guy☝🏻

  • @russellstephan6844
    @russellstephan6844 3 года назад +1

    It's rather strange windows remain in these types of constructions -- solid foam walls ground-to-attic with large flat-screen televisions indoors to act as windows with CCTV cameras on the outside. Think about it... Any room in the house can have any window view desired. A couple of PV panels on the roof could supply all the power necessary for low-voltage daylight duplicating LED lighting.
    Of course, with a larger PV installation, a geothermal battery, and a heat pump, construction costs could be lowered on the house due to less reliance on perfect passivity.
    The options for near-off grid living are nearly unlimited today.

    • @khandam7709
      @khandam7709 2 года назад +1

      people dont' want to live in the matrix! What' strange is there is no north american manufacturer making thermal shutters with a day light sensor that automatically opens window shutters during the day and closes them at night. a 3" r15 shutter would be easy to manufacture and could make an R7 window into a R22 assembly.

  • @johnp556
    @johnp556 4 года назад +20

    That house must be quiet as a tomb inside.

    • @doubledarefan
      @doubledarefan 4 года назад +2

      Nothing a stereo cannot fix.

    • @g.m.fallon3135
      @g.m.fallon3135 4 года назад +2

      John P It has to being next to the RR tracks, but hey I bet he got the lot for pennies

    • @paulmcgown7504
      @paulmcgown7504 2 года назад

      @@g.m.fallon3135 It would be interesting to know if the people in the house will hear the nearby trains with the s##t load of insulation.

  • @douglasthompson2740
    @douglasthompson2740 4 года назад +1

    My question is how did they pin the foam footings to keep the whole assembly from sliding about? This is adjacent to a major major fault line. Can't remember exactly but I believe the San Andreas goes right up through Vancouver Is. to the Queen Charlottes which puts Whistler within several miles. A sandy silty riverbed surrounding a very small rock pad isn't going to be fun under liquefaction. He said six feet down but no indication if that achieved bedrock either. I do applaud the rebar schedule in the slab.

  • @Sub-Zero-Homes
    @Sub-Zero-Homes 4 года назад

    You can only slow heat down without the use of a vacuum and I always think it is better to have higher quality insulation than thicker because you are not only heating the inside but the mass of the insulation too. You need windows to let free heat in because insulation isn't one way only. There are vacuum insulation panels and aerogel and you can always cover windows up at night with super thin quality insulation like those I just mentioned.

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад

      You are correct that the insulation also adds thermal mass. This is very useful to allow heat pumps to run during the day when they can be more efficient and to switch off for a while to take advantage of the thermal mass.

  • @audiobrad99
    @audiobrad99 4 года назад +1

    You asked the right question, Matt, when you asked why the walls are so thick. All that insulation with R9 windows--makes no sense. You're just throwing money at it and barely improving the overall R value past a certain point. Assuming a tight seal (which this build definitely has) windows and doors are your weakest link. There comes a point when you simply can't overcome the heat loss through windows and doors with thicker walls, and they went way past it. But hey, more power to them for selling the client on a crazy amount of over-build. Fools and their money...

  • @paulbetka2966
    @paulbetka2966 3 года назад

    Awesome build 🙏👍🏻👍🏻

  • @enriquealdogarcia4850
    @enriquealdogarcia4850 Год назад

    it´s really amazing!!! many thanks!!!

  • @MikeGerz
    @MikeGerz 4 года назад +4

    My biggest worry too is if it would float in a flood. Conventional homes float away bad enough in a flood, but I would think adding a two feet foam raft would just exacerbate the problem.

    • @ailawil89
      @ailawil89 4 года назад

      Pretty sure it's offset by the amount of concrete in the lower level's walls and the floor slab, not to mention the rest of the house. At any rate, it's used in the construction of roads, bridges, and a bunch of other commercial structures. I'm sure it's safe enough.

  • @kstorm889
    @kstorm889 3 года назад +1

    i always think these are interesting, but when you have r60 walls and r100 roof, 95% of your heat loss is then from your air exchanger, and windows. something like this probably uses a heat pump based air exchange. I'm sure they probably have some r10 curtains the auto cover the windows at night too.

    • @khandam7709
      @khandam7709 2 года назад

      Im pretty sure they do NOT have R10 auto cover windows at night. Because I've been researching that and no one makes them. Seems like a no brainer to have thermal shutters, but for some reason it just has not caught on, and the ones I do see are all custom made.

  • @cokeyNbk
    @cokeyNbk 4 года назад +1

    they are on attic. tarp over studs. going to be fun when. the cable guys has to drop a line and drill through that . run conduit people. builders now a days should know this by now

    • @dennispope8160
      @dennispope8160 4 года назад

      Along with conduit to each room from a central area to run internet and whatever else the future brings.

    • @snoozeuloozetv1562
      @snoozeuloozetv1562 4 года назад

      No need to come threw the roof with cable. Everything can be laid out in his interior wall cavity.

    • @cokeyNbk
      @cokeyNbk 4 года назад

      snoozeulooze tv trust me. some one always wants extra lines. builders never put enough

  • @charlesstevensEnki
    @charlesstevensEnki 4 года назад +1

    Luv this stuff!

  • @KJSvitko
    @KJSvitko 4 года назад +2

    Wetlands should be protected and not built on.
    They provide areas for storm water run off and to recharge ground water.

    • @canvfrluvr8005
      @canvfrluvr8005 3 года назад

      It's in a flood protection zone, not a wetland

  • @davidkolody8757
    @davidkolody8757 4 года назад +1

    Property tax is assessed based on the external dimensions of the structure, so that additional 1’ of wall thickness could very well be 200 sq ft of area. Assessed value will reflect the build cost, which is probably over $300 sq ft, for this building. The extra area for the wall insulation would add an additional $60K to the assessed value.
    Not sure what the mill rate is in Whistler, but where I live (Ottawa) that would add over $600 to your annual property tax.
    That wall detail might save a couple dollars of energy costs and cost many hundreds more each year in property tax.

    • @travelfeet
      @travelfeet 4 года назад +1

      This is a fault in tax policy, and one of the many policies in many countries that undermine changes in building construction practices. So yes you are correct, but assessment policies can be changed (and should!)

    • @canvfrluvr8005
      @canvfrluvr8005 3 года назад

      No where near Whistler.

  • @chadlegault9993
    @chadlegault9993 4 года назад

    Thank you for doing other climates!!! :)

  • @jeremiahcoles2378
    @jeremiahcoles2378 4 года назад

    Super cool build!!!

  • @bryanverberg4342
    @bryanverberg4342 4 года назад +19

    Ok R 100 house in a flood plain on a river bed Wtf

    • @genemounce8302
      @genemounce8302 4 года назад +9

      More $ than brains like the rest of the ppl that can afford these types of homes. lol

    • @bryanverberg4342
      @bryanverberg4342 4 года назад +2

      No thanks

    • @ethiesm1
      @ethiesm1 4 года назад

      At least in will Float

    • @bryanverberg4342
      @bryanverberg4342 4 года назад

      Elbert Basa if u want boat buy a boat

  • @mountainbikerdave
    @mountainbikerdave 3 года назад

    the details are insane.
    i would love to live in a passive house though.

  • @scottwebber652
    @scottwebber652 4 года назад

    What I notice is that all that insulation etc will require a a similar approach for the air system n u still need heat for the-40 winter temperatures n more than u think because if it looks cold Ull b cold too even inside. U have to condition the inside as well !!

  • @stewmeat9261
    @stewmeat9261 4 года назад +2

    the heating source will be a candle.

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад

      Heat source will be the bodies of the people in the home + the sun during the day.

  • @dingking6123
    @dingking6123 4 года назад +4

    My dreaming houses are in "Matt Risinger"; my real house is in "This Old House".

  • @ericlundgren3319
    @ericlundgren3319 4 года назад +51

    Id like to know the cost per sq ft on this one!

    • @hiroanz
      @hiroanz 4 года назад +12

      Whistler is the Aspen of Canada. This house is worth $3M ~ 6M depending on location.

    • @mariow1851
      @mariow1851 4 года назад +2

      Depending on the region, around $300 a square foot and up just to build.

    • @ericlundgren3319
      @ericlundgren3319 4 года назад +3

      Wow! My region is less than 150 sq.ft starting and goes up from there. Seems like bad times waiting to happen building in a flood plane. I just cant get over building where u anticipate flooding.. Shouldnt the house be built on stilts like coastal locations?

    • @wally6193
      @wally6193 4 года назад +2

      the build costs went up in BC a couple of years ago to the point where they are just absurd, no real reason that I could figure out as materials or labour never went that high. 3 years ago it was around $170/sqft on the island, yes whistler is more expensive for land and maybe add a bit for location/land. It's even at or over $300/sqft on the island for local builders now, just crazy, just ripping people. I should add that the $300/sqft was just for ordinary builds, nothing fancy.

    • @Dougie_trades
      @Dougie_trades 4 года назад

      Eric Lundgren yea seems crazy to build a house that size for that amount per sq ft and put that at massive risk it’s not always that the water is flowing it’s what the water is flowing lol

  • @TeeJay_757
    @TeeJay_757 4 года назад +30

    That is the most expensive Monopoly house ever.

    • @sdafasdfasdfsda
      @sdafasdfasdfsda 4 года назад +2

      It's definitely going on Boardwalk! Imagine the rent you get when someone lands on it!

    • @rossmcleod7983
      @rossmcleod7983 4 года назад +3

      @Thomas Lonergan and the cheapest to run.

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 4 года назад +3

      @@rossmcleod7983 Over its short life the equipment will work hard and harder because it will become under sized as the tight envelope leaks from age and repairs and it will becomes less efficient. Ultra high efficiency equipment cost substantially more to maintain and repair and blows past any savings you get on the utilities Also Not to mention the equipment runs longer and harder to keep warm in winter and to remove the heat mass in the summer. See a lot of this on new homes. cost of homes like this are triple the cost of a standard home. There is NO savings going this efficient

    • @butopiatoo
      @butopiatoo 4 года назад +1

      KelMaster Construction why in the world do this? I mean other than an academic exercise? Makes no sense to me.

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 4 года назад

      @@butopiatoo To prove it can be done and marketing bs. You can convince people to buy water at 2 dollars a bottle vs 10cents from their faucets. You can sell anything to some moron conviced it's what the cool people do.

  • @TheGalacticWest
    @TheGalacticWest 2 года назад

    We are cold too.

  • @archbuilder71
    @archbuilder71 4 года назад +3

    Did they extend the rock wool insulation up the gable wall so the the top of the exterior insulation is the same height as the top of the attic insulation? That is kind of what it looked like in the shot showing the gable framing.

  • @jongason660
    @jongason660 4 года назад

    Wow impressed

  • @samuraisamson
    @samuraisamson 4 года назад +8

    What are your thoughts on autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks for passive houses? Seems like they are used widely everywhere except North America for residential buildings.

    • @stevepailet8258
      @stevepailet8258 3 года назад

      AAC is ok. using a layer of rigid insulation out board would make it better.

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад

      AAC has some potential for passive houses, especially if use with a thin-joint mortar system, but it does have problems with cracking that are quite difficult to manage - even the experts struggle to stop it cracking. I would recommend using a medium dense concrete block that doesn't have this problem. You can't use a thin-joint mortar system then, only conventional mortaring works, but they don't crack and they can be as airtight as AAC. You will need to add another inch of insulation to the wall though. AAC can also be difficult to get a good fixing into. You have to only use the correct fixings otherwise the blocks can crack, and the fixings can be hard to come by if you don't live in a country where AAC is commonly used.

  • @doubledarefan
    @doubledarefan 4 года назад +2

    Why all that empty attic space❓ Why not put the insulation on the top, with a layer or 3 on the roof deck, and you would have a LEGO Room where you can sit and build LEGO castles while the house floats away on its built-in raft during the next flood❓

    • @gblakev
      @gblakev 4 года назад +1

      I costs more to build a roof with wide rafters so that the attic can be finished. Trusses use smaller pieces (usually 2x4's) but the real difference is the extra work necessary to make a rafter roof air tight and well insulated.

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад

      @@gblakev You are correct. If you have the land, it is cheaper to build all the living space you need under a trussed roof. Only for a tight site would making the roof to be insulated and habitable space be a sensible option.

  • @elcamel1216
    @elcamel1216 2 года назад

    Would love to see a follow up on this one!

  • @sweetkellymay
    @sweetkellymay 4 года назад +2

    You need all that insulation, to deaden the noise from the train tracks, in the back yard..

  • @davidschwartz2398
    @davidschwartz2398 4 года назад

    The concrete slab and house on structural foam is mind blowing!

    • @Joshua79C
      @Joshua79C 4 года назад

      Nothing new, they do said foam filled/supported slabs already in parts of Australia.

  • @JTamilio
    @JTamilio 4 года назад +2

    Myvest... Majvest... Myvest... Majvest!

  • @pianova5825
    @pianova5825 4 года назад +3

    Siga Majvest is not airtight!!! It allows air diffusion but works as a barrier for any water.

    • @nomen_meus
      @nomen_meus 4 года назад

      It allows vapor diffusion, not air diffusion. It IS an air barrier.

    • @pianova5825
      @pianova5825 4 года назад

      Nomen Meus believe me. I’ve used this product and there’s definitely air coming through the material!

    • @nomen_meus
      @nomen_meus 4 года назад +1

      @@pianova5825 While no material may be 100% effective, Majvest performs well below the minimums to be considered an air barrier, according to Siga's specs.
      Air permeance (ASTM E2178)
      0.00114 cfm/ft2 @1.57 psf
      0.0058L/m².s @ 75 Pa (minimum for air barrier material is 0.02)
      Air leakage in assembly Penetrated Wall (ASTM E2357)
      (Including ASTM E283)
      0.0002 cfm/ft2 @1.57 psf
      0.0008 L/m².s @ 75 Pa (minimum for air barrier assembly is 0.20)
      Of course, all seams/joints in the material must be properly sealed.

    • @barisay7244
      @barisay7244 3 года назад

      @@nomen_meus The notion that a membrane can allow vapor through but block air sounds utter BS to me, since vapor is part of air. There has to be a more accurate description of what these barriers do.

  • @bryanball2991
    @bryanball2991 4 года назад

    With a house in a flood plain and that much foam it might float away. Maybe the Icf is to weight it down?

  • @kriskohut7159
    @kriskohut7159 3 года назад

    An old camping tarp shelter would be considered Passive on the west coast compared to anywhere else in Canada!

  • @freeyesmaybe
    @freeyesmaybe 4 года назад +1

    why i think this is a good thing CFC movie - "Get the technology advantage!" - RUclips

  • @berksoaks4340
    @berksoaks4340 4 года назад +2

    Talk about a yeti cooler!

  • @s0uthp4w68
    @s0uthp4w68 4 года назад

    I wonder if any of those techniques can be adopted for the heat in Florida and still make it safe through hurricane season.

  • @xxxrsgrsgxxx
    @xxxrsgrsgxxx 4 года назад +8

    The cost of construction for this house to minimise it's energy cost is not feasible. The rate of return on investment is dismal. Impressive construction nonetheless.

    • @cornpop7805
      @cornpop7805 4 года назад +2

      We had a small development pop up down the street about 8yrs ago ($300k). We thought they were too high end for the neighborhood and they'd never recoup the cost of their high end features, in our $150k neighborhood.
      4yrs later, they were selling for 2.0x to 2.5x their original cost.
      The energy efficiency of this build could be seen as a major asset and this house that might have cost $750k to build, could pull 1.5M in a decade. Also, if we cap and trade carbon credits in the near future, energy prices will 3x to 4x. Then the additional installation will pay for itself.

    • @rossmcleod7983
      @rossmcleod7983 4 года назад

      @Specialist spot on. Your observations apply here in Australia too.

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 4 года назад

      Home valves change by outside factors, it still doesnt make the home cost effective when value goes up for a few years in fact will cost a person more.
      Bought a house in CA for 140 that wasn't anywhere near this efficient and 5 years later sold for 350K. Made more off that sale then investing in snake oil that make the manufacturers rich and would have considerably destroyed my profit to sell by going ultra efficient. The ultra tight homes that have HVAC designed to work at ultimate performance drops like a rock as the house ages and more places for it to leak. The equipment has to work a lot harder to maintain and those systems cost triple of what a standard equipment costs to repair and keep running. In the end you paid so much more for a home that cant maintain itself as it gets older and cost substantially more to try at promised savings that never materialized

    • @xxxrsgrsgxxx
      @xxxrsgrsgxxx 4 года назад

      @@cornpop7805 That is a surprising scenario, of course many variables should also be considered in that example.
      I just recently built a home in Canada. We have 0.12$/kwh rates currently with big increase due to come bringing the rates to between 0.22$/kwh to 0.25$/kwh next year. (our grid is currently diesel turbine generation and we will be changing to a green alternative - hydroelectricity; also not feasible).
      I'm an architectural engineering technologist, and did energy modeling and heat load calculations for my house with comparison to cost to construct. It was very surprising to see how upgrading building assemblies with additional insulation would hardly ever be favorable in a ROI.

    • @altergreenhorn
      @altergreenhorn 4 года назад

      Similar talking was heard here in Europe +20 years ago when first passive houses was introduced , but then ecological point of view and energy prices goes up and now almost everybody in central or north Europe build more or less passive houses or some even plus houses, because you get passive part of invesment back in less than 8 years by today energy prices.

  • @exstox
    @exstox 3 года назад

    Hi Matt, Just discovered your channel. It's fantastic. I had a question on the foam that's being used more and more for the high R values it provides.
    How much oil and how much energy is required to produce the foam and how much green house gas is produced? I don't know if those numbers are easy to come by but maybe in one of your future videos you could cover this? I'll be doing a Passive House for my next residence and foam seems such a cool and easy way to go but it would be good to know the embodied energy involved with foam as I could go with other types of insulation depending on how these number compare.
    Thanks and keep up the good work!

  • @joelrodriguez9231
    @joelrodriguez9231 4 года назад

    Nice I like

  • @timskufca8039
    @timskufca8039 4 года назад +1

    sorry, but I think the flood plane should be commons (no private property). But that being said, the Passive House details are great!

  • @fredochs
    @fredochs 4 года назад

    The biggest issue with this house is its location in a flood plain. They didn't mention the flood plain designation: 100 yr flood plain? 500 yr? 20 yr? (LOL). Flood resistant walls means the walls can get wet....but water can PUSH things as well as get them wet. Water can excavate the foundation, water can push the slab, etc. Any bets on how far the house moves during a big flood?

  • @scorpio6587
    @scorpio6587 4 года назад

    Awesome

  • @darylwright3393
    @darylwright3393 4 года назад

    I hope this home is soundproof too because it's sitting right next to train tracks.

  • @rosscoep1450
    @rosscoep1450 4 года назад +6

    Whats this house cost, I feel like the cost to build out weights the energy savings.

    • @douglashoule9666
      @douglashoule9666 4 года назад +1

      pretty sure the owner does not care about the savings. They have BIG enviro rules there, so to build to costs lots, and to do it right, it costs more..

    • @ArthurDentZaphodBeeb
      @ArthurDentZaphodBeeb 4 года назад +9

      These homes piss on the environment - massive amounts of hydrocarbons needed for the foam and concrete. Excavate 6' of subgrade and import 2' boulders. Layers of rockwool. All to save a few hundred in energy costs? Reality is money far better spent on a less energy-intensive building and simply installing solar. And then the occupants live in an off-gassing foam and rockwool cocoon (rockwool off-gasses formaldehyde) which then requires an expensive HVAC system. Rather than being impressed with these ridiculous homes, they deserve nothing but scorn and derision.

    • @stickdoctor001
      @stickdoctor001 4 года назад +3

      @@ArthurDentZaphodBeeb Rockwool hasn't offgassed formaldehyde for 40 years.

    • @rosscoep1450
      @rosscoep1450 4 года назад

      I'm all for energy efficiency, just wondering why be this efficient. It does seem like overkill, but if the house lasts for 150 years then it makes sense.

    • @zack9912000
      @zack9912000 4 года назад +1

      @@stickdoctor001 today still it's a problem and clearly have not be following the imported products still do off gas.

  • @dielauwen
    @dielauwen 4 года назад +4

    Just put some fur on it. CAT grows longer fur in winter and does just fine.

  • @thewhiteknight02
    @thewhiteknight02 4 года назад +1

    Window and door jambs must be ridiculous! R-100->!

  • @user-xv5iw5zh4m
    @user-xv5iw5zh4m 3 года назад

    How's the house fastned to the ground? Won't it be blown away or tipped on it's side by high winds? It's a fairly tall house you know, and that concrete isn't all that heavy IMO

  • @merleschmidt8772
    @merleschmidt8772 4 года назад +1

    I like Pierre, but yikes I think it would have been way easier to just special order 2500 sq ft YETI cooler.

  • @joelrodriguez9231
    @joelrodriguez9231 4 года назад

    I wish I could live I love it it my dream house

  • @lazlototh
    @lazlototh 3 года назад

    When a big quake hits, the house is liable to experience lateral forces of up to one g. How is the concrete slab tied to the ground through the 22" of foam?

    • @canvfrluvr8005
      @canvfrluvr8005 3 года назад

      It likely isn't. That's kinda the point I would think.

  • @stevepailet8258
    @stevepailet8258 3 года назад

    I would love to see if they even need a hair drier to heat this place in the middle of winter. What were the blower door results? this is a super layer cake of insulation and on top of that an air barrier with more insulation. living in climate zone 4 just no way that this would make sense for 5 houses

  • @townsendliving9750
    @townsendliving9750 4 года назад +2

    Those sub slab foam panels are interesting. I'm planning on using 2 layers of R7 rigid foam and then vapor barrier on top. A friend is doing a heat loss analysis right now to see if theres any place beneficial to add more insualtion within my budget. But I would like to do more under the slab since I will never be able to do it again. Plus if the panels are common on road construction they might be cheap. Of anyone has a link or a source please let me know

    • @JorgeMorales-dz4pv
      @JorgeMorales-dz4pv 4 года назад

      google "geofoam" to find some suppliers and technical info

    • @townsendliving9750
      @townsendliving9750 4 года назад

      @@JorgeMorales-dz4pv thank you, exactly what I was looking for.

    • @christophergruenwald5054
      @christophergruenwald5054 4 года назад

      Put the vapor barrier under the foam, that way your insulation is on the dry side. Foam will absorb water slowly over time with standing water pressure.

    • @townsendliving9750
      @townsendliving9750 4 года назад

      @@christophergruenwald5054 I'm in new mexico in the desert, so not much ground water. But I do have a yard with tons of trees and 100% grass so I water alot. I dont think that would get under the house though. The reason the insualtion is below is supposedly when you pour concrete, the concrete want to work it's way underneath the foam and push it up. The vapor barrier on top prevents this

  • @bigphillyed
    @bigphillyed 4 года назад +68

    Anyone who builds a home in a flood plane, deserves everything that happens. SMH!

    • @stiggy60426
      @stiggy60426 4 года назад +14

      Idk why anyone would knowingly build in a flood zone

    • @LuigiRandazzo21
      @LuigiRandazzo21 4 года назад +27

      It's a raft foundation, so it can float away... just kidding

    • @ColeSpolaric
      @ColeSpolaric 4 года назад +10

      It depends on if it's a 10 year, 50 year, or 100 year flood plain.

    • @kmonnier
      @kmonnier 4 года назад +11

      That’s what Moses said

    • @xBRVTALx
      @xBRVTALx 4 года назад +29

      @@ColeSpolaric Building in a 100 yr plane is still stupid. Here in Houston we have had three 500yr floods in the last 4 years and two 800yr floods in the last 5 years.

  • @bruceda9
    @bruceda9 4 года назад

    Aztecs did the same thing, when building on a lake.

  • @paulmcgown7504
    @paulmcgown7504 2 года назад

    That flood plain isn't a huge issue as the rail line acts as a very strong berm or dike between the house and the Squamish River. I think that the last bad flood was in the 1970's and it didn't overwhelm the rail line then. That builder was doing way more than the minimum requirement from the local building approval and the home buyer must of had money to burn ; I suspect he couldn't quite
    come up with the scratch to buy land in Whistler so he decided to blow the money he had it on extravagant build in the cheaper location.

  • @kirill__kirill
    @kirill__kirill 3 года назад

    Sorry, I didn't understand how much heat insulation material is in floor, wall, roof in centimeters?
    Could you write number in screen corner in video next time, please.

  • @DennisWintjes2
    @DennisWintjes2 4 года назад

    Thx for sharing. Like #730

  • @WearySteerer
    @WearySteerer 4 года назад

    Maybe the glass will heated?
    Some manufacturers do this in Europe.

  • @krap101
    @krap101 4 года назад +4

    So, the house floats if there's a flood?

    • @chriscampbell5823
      @chriscampbell5823 4 года назад +1

      krap101 a raft slab is a typical slab construction method for n Australia so is a waffle pod slabs so foam used instead of fill to raise insulation. Raft slab is good for reactive soil sights as when clay or soil expands the slab won't heave and crack due to the raft construction which is basically edge beams and thickening beams in the middle with the extra trench

  • @RussellNelson330
    @RussellNelson330 4 года назад

    More videos of your own house , what updating has been done?

  • @brettmoore3194
    @brettmoore3194 3 года назад

    Should of just put starlite as sheathing

  • @pamelas9
    @pamelas9 4 года назад

    Lol. Matt is channeling @offtheranch on the outro.

  • @joeschlotthauer840
    @joeschlotthauer840 4 года назад

    At 4:16 Nudura is clearly visible, but no link in the description....

  • @harlinbrandvold8605
    @harlinbrandvold8605 2 года назад

    Mike, you're in SQUAMISH not "Whistler foothills".

  • @longbeachdub420
    @longbeachdub420 3 года назад

    I wonder why the “service cavity” framing is vertical and not horizontal (inside of the vapor barrier and structural studs. I’ve seen it horizontal and then you don’t need to cut for the electrical wires and PeX

    • @tlangdon12
      @tlangdon12 9 месяцев назад

      You don't need to cut the electric cables and water pipes if they drop from the ceiling inside the vertical service cavity. Houses built with "Posi-Joists" already have a thee dimensional cavity in the ceiling that can be used to route all services throughout the house to the walls.

  • @ColeSpolaric
    @ColeSpolaric 4 года назад

    Matt. Have you ever had a chance to compare Majrex with what Certainteed's smart vapor barrier?

  • @jamesoncross7494
    @jamesoncross7494 4 года назад

    On the 2x6 framing, why do they run wood horizontally before they put plywood on?