He's British rather than N American, so not very surprising. Only older British people use lbs/oz now, and not all of them. Most commonly we encounter these units in recipes. Anyway when your currency is Pounds (sterling) and the price of gear comes up often with Roman's subject then the confusion is unwanted.
When I started watching photography videos several years ago on RUclips, nearly everyone I encountered with English or Australian and they used metric all the time obviously although sometimes they would not use it. Since I know both the metric system very well and the US English system very well, and since I'm American, it doesn't bother me because it helps me reinforce my knowledge of the metric system. I prefer the metric system anyway.
The whole point of a camera bag with huge logo on it is to make sure everyone knows you're a photographer. So I have a cheap, generic bag for my cheap, vintage lenses. I also bought a surplus backpack from Czech army - it's rubber-coated for weather proofing. It's on the heavy side, but I don't mind additional exercise...
@@urgon6321 Shoot film and you don't have to worry about having expensive gear lol. Olympus XA2 super sharp, Rollei 35 XF also supper sharp. Neither break $100 lol
@@Zetaphotography, believe it or not, but I have a collection of old analog cameras. Unfortunately with my eyesight I can't shoot any of them via viewfinder. So I use a mirrorless instead...
Camerabags. Been there, done that. Too many empty and unused bags in random closets or the attic. I disagree regarding your UV-filter point. Everything that is THAT close to the lens opening, will not render unless it is an effect filter like a promist, or a polarizing filter. Try to make a small dot on a UV-filter and see if you can see it. It won't render onto the censor. I've done tests to see if I can notice different quality UV-filters. I couldn't. There are several tests on the net that claim to see a colour shift, but online you can't see what they are talking about. Almost all tests I've seen haven't even shown a noticable shaprness decrease in the real world. I find it better to regularly clean my UV-filter than it is to clean the lens element. Some of my fuji lenses are quite small, and I can't always get rid of all the oils that tend to get pushed to the sides.
I think statements like "why put cheap glass in front of expensive glass!" makes it sound like such an obvious negative that few people test the assumption. It just 'makes sense', and so the myth lives on. It makes sense to me too, but in practice I can't see much impact on my shots
Haha - by the same token, a small ding on your lens will not have any impact on the image. I religiously use a lens hood. Improves the contrast and protects the lens.
UV filters are a complete waste of money imho. If they work for you, absolutely go for it. But the exact same thing you said about the UV-filter applies to the surface of the lens as well - you won't see any small imperfections and if you have to clean the surface of the glass, even a couple of t-shirt-wipes will do (I generally find the rugged, rounded lens surface easier to clean than filter glass). For protection against impact and rain, lens hoods are much better. However, I think it's good you make a point for cheap UV-Filters. Crazy price tags for UV-filters are borderline criminal
@@crazysheepfilms Yes, I agree with the scratches on the front element. Normally they won't show, but they'll decrease the resell value. Many UV-filters are overpriced! I only use those brands I like and trust. And on my X100 I need a filter to keep it WR
When it comes to filters, there's only 2 I use... Polarizing (can't edit out reflections in Photoshop) and ND filters. UV are a waste of money, even if you want to protect the lens, just put a hood on it. You will get better contrast in your images anyway in certain light and reduce flares.
I think the concern is around cleaning for most people. Yes a hood provides a lot of protection from direct impacts, but when eventually you want to clean dust or some minor splash off, if your cloth has hard dust in it, or one of the bits of dust on the lens is harder rock type dust or dirt you could scratch during cleaning. With a near 0 stop filter you can be less paranoid, clean more regularly, and replace every few years if scratches appear.
@@artgreen6915 I'm with Roman though, that unless you spend a *lot* on a clear or UV filter then you're always sacrificing a little image quality when you use them. Honestly, do what I did when I was deciding if I should stop using them and try shooting the same scenes with and without the filter for a bit, especially in stable lighting conditions so you can make direct comparisons. I always found the images without the relatively cheap Hoya or Tiffen filters I was using had slightly better colours and contrast straight out of camera and needed less editing. For situations where it's raining or very dusty, or if I'm shooting a gig with lots of sweat and beer, I'll still throw on a filter to protect the lens, but for most situations I'd rather just have a hood to protect the front element from most small knocks than have a filter that's actually detracting from my image quality, even if only slightly.
I like this channel, but this video would've benefited greatly from some pickup/insert shots of the various things discussed. As an example, when discussing the pro mist filters and the blooming, you should've shown a couple sample pics and likewise for the similar affect you can achieve in Photoshop. Same when discussing the tripods (e.g., should've shown the problems and the solutions tripods)
A physiotherapist told me years ago that one of the easiest ways to a bad back is to carry a single shoulder-strap camera-bag with a camera and a couple of lenses for a day, She advised me to get a small rucksack and wear it properly. Unfortunately, by the time she told me this the damage had already been done. Worst purchase ever--- a really strong camera bag with heavy-duty nylon fittings, D-rings and hooks, specifically for the once in a lifetime wildlife safari holiday. It's not until you get to the really eerily quiet, early mornings, when you can hear a pin drop and the smallest sound carries for miles, that you realise that a nylon D-ring and the strap's nylon hook squeak as they rub against each other with every step you take. It doesn't make you the most popular person with either the early-morning animals or the other photographers!!! Excellent video with some new takes on old vantage points. I'll re-visit some of them now that the autumn brings a more realistic time for 'early-morning' sunrise photographs.
The discussion about being crap for regular use is probably why I love the Peak Design messenger bag so much, the dividers just fold over and around to fit whatever I'm wanting to take that day. I didn't realize how useful that'd but I've yet to go "Darn the bag would be big enough to hold all this stuff I want but I just can't get them in". Much better than the other camera bags I've had in the past
I can agree with you 100%. Two drawers full of stuff are my witnesses. During the last stripping out, I built a macro stand out of flash rails, ball heads, magic arms, quick-release clamps and plates, L-rails, screws and a center column. But the drawers are still full.
As an amateur photographer and architecture background person I liked this video a lot. Reminds me of when I was in London 2 years ago photographing and framing the architecture there. This channel has got me starting to look into street photography. Thanks!
Tupperware containers lined with closed cell foam inside an ergonomic rucksack - been doing it for over 30 years. Pro Mist filters are highly overated - try a Nikon Soft No 1, it’s really subtle, controllable and fantastic on skin tones. UV filters, I spend a fortune on them - run a pencil lead around the threads and they will never bind. Gorilla Pods - pointless.
Good honest points well made. No hype, no crap just truth based upon experience. You get my vote having been there too. Wish this video came out 4 years ago. Great job Roman. 👌
It is such a light-hearted video, got me laughing on the gorilla tripod for sure. All valid points and I am happy to know I am not alone. I really appreciate your videos.
Monopod will forever be my favorite gear lol. No need to set up legs, and I always have a clean steady shot, and walking stick lol. Idk why more people don’t use them. Of course, it could never replace a tripod for astrophotography, self shots, etc.
Camera bags - my pet peev is that majority of them are designed by marketing departments who make arbitrary guesses about what the compartments should be like. I like my DSLRs with vertical grips - good luck trying to find a backpack for that. Then once you loaded up your backpack while laid down, you'd find out that either everything collapses down on itself while in the upright carry position and/or you couldn't pull anything out of it without losing half your other things falling on the ground. And don't get me started on weather proof materials. There are few companies who address those issues but they charge a premium so high that it competes with other gear expenses and loses its value. My best experiences were with good'ol photographer's shoulder bag and a motorcycle backpack. As for UV filters - it took me a looong time to figure out what those star ghosts were on the nightscape photos - a many lost times/locations never to be repeated again - hard lessons. I still use'em though, but now I am deliberate about the choices and it's only in crap weather/conditions, when i know i'll be wiping sh!t off many times without worrying what muck was there to start with. And yes, I killed one filter but saved the lens once. What i don't use UV filter for is to cut the UV light - that's the dumbest idea ever - unless you're using quartz lenses, in which case why are you complaning about UV 😄
Totally agree with you in all camera gear, even though I’m very picky to what I add or purchase, I’ve done my fair share of hype purchases and all theses items you mentioned not only have costed a lot of money (luckily I’ve sold them), but also have been useless. Now I’ve kept everything to a minimal and has been a tons better for the wallet, back and for the creative process. Also, great tips and photos mate!
I'm not sure I can agree with the bags section. Depends entirely on what you do of course but having a nice camera bag is essential for me personally. For local shoots that I may need a full kit with, I take a Tenba DNA Messenger 16 Pro. Fits 1-2 bodies and 2-3 larger lenses in it no problem. Can also take the insert out completely and it's just a nice large bag. I have a Lowepro 350 AW II that I took to Iceland with a full kit that I needed, which with its hard shell/padding and quick access to the waterproof cover helped me a great deal in weird weather. If it's just a day trip around town or something we're talking about, the Brevite bags can also be used as camera bags or just standard backpacks. Low profile and good quality. I just wish the camera pocket opened from the back instead of the front. I even have a sling for if I'm just walking around and want to carry a single camera/lens combo. A good bag should never be underestimated. Similarly, a nice UV filter can cost 60-120 USD that WILL protect that front element. I've dropped a $2400 lens right on its front and the only reason the front element wasn't mangled in some rock/gravel is due to having a filter on the front. Quality ones don't impact IQ at all, either.
After my father died I inherited a little bit of money. Not much, but enough to buy any camera I wanted including a Leica. I chose the Fuji XT4 that came with the 16-80 mm and one nice strap. I don’t even use a camera bag. I have an old canvas side bag that allows a quick tuck of the camera on the fly. Other than that? That’s it really. I bought one prime lens and barely even use it. I find that by limiting myself, I’m actually freeing myself. I’m very happy with my limitations. I suggest everyone else try it. ✌️
I can say the following regarding Filters: there are professional uses of filters and you would rent it for exactly the purpose you need. The Pro mist Filter is a filter that you very often use on professional film Shootings. We also use haze and other things to get away the clean air. So that the light can show off. And the others thing is, that you may simulate filter in post, but sometimes I take pictures with and without filter and combine them! And you can see something instant that you will only see later in post. So it’s helpful to learn too. But maybe 🤔 I am to nerdy about that. I just love to shoot with filter.
I was looking at these promist filters and they are definitely not cheap… in the end I found it is easy to make a similar effect in Affinity Photo (or PS I am sure) by selecting highlights and applying a blur. As you say you can then adjust the intensity to your heart’s content as well! Good video, I can’t wait to get back into London.
Was going to make the same comment.. Domke's are strong light and have a neutral appearance if you get a dark colour... I got my first one back in 1985 and have just purchased the 803 messenger bag for my Fuji cameras. RE: Pro-mist.. got one in a video filter set, never used it... Re: UV, I personally do use then as I don't use but rather lose lens caps... RE: Gorilla pod.. got given one.. agree rubbish, but I only use a tripod for video..or for photos when using a 600mm or longer for say cricket or other sports otherwise never needed one... A monopod does a better job for most situations.. but for 200mm and below never used one.
One, of many, of the things I love about Roman’s channel is that he’s always direct, honest, and to the point through his EXPERIENCE…and never acts arrogant or hiding his knowledge from you. Not many people like him on RUclips/social media. Definitely a class act with the photo skills to back it all up!
Strongly agree with everything except the mist filters. I like their look, and I think it's just a warning about using them properly, like any filter. I wouldn't settle for post processing, firstly because I have much more confidence in my photographic skills than my photoshop skills, but more importantly because I want to spend my time outside taking photos, and minimise my time sitting in front of a PC processing images. That said I do take your point that some peoples' expectations about these filters are either misplaced or overrated.
The bag that I am using only costs $7, but it can carry 5 apsc lenses plus a lot of small accessories such as battery and sd card. What's more, its design is pretty simple and practical, allowing me to switch lens in less than 15 seconds. And it's lightweight. However this camera bag was manufactured by a little-known manufacturer.
I shoot film only, and mostly medium format. I (nearly) fully agree with all of your points. My partial exception would be the UV or clear filter. UV light can degrade film images. Further, as I am mostly out in mother nature, I have to contend with blowing dust, rain, and such, where that filter keeps me from having to clean/wipe dry my lens front element. I use lens hoods, so I do not value what little physical protection such a filter might afford. I acquired must of my filters 25-40 years ago, when they did not command the ridiculous prices charged today. I use these and other filters only when circumstances require. "Gorilla Pod", I remember when they first came out, thinking that they were about the dumbest sucker bait junk I'd seen in years.
So nice to see someone doing the almost exact same walk I did in the summer with a friend. Great suggestions on the angles, and shots. I agree pretty much with everything you said. Bags have become a bug-bear. I've got so many of them, and none of them are perfect. As I've got older, I've wanted lighter equipment, and the bags just add too much weight to it. I've just got a small 10L backpack that seems better, and doesn't scream camera bag, so hoping that will work for me. As for gorilla pods, yes, I have one, and never use it. UV filters I don't use. I moved from Canon to Olympus a few years ago, mainly because the Canon was just too heavy, but then I found out about Olyumpus's Live Bulb mode, and that was a complete game changer for long exposure night photography. Seems like you are a London photographer, like me. Cool!
Been using high quality uv filters for 17 years because I hate using or remembering lens caps and have found every year I need to replace them because they get a ton of micro scratches that otherwise would have been on my expensive lens.. I do have a problem with camera bags and no matter how many I try I always go back to my Think Tank retrospective 5 that nothing else seems to do what I want. I don't worry to much about being robbed because I live in one of those places where I am allowed to be armed for self protection.
Good video. Got a bad back myself and have gotten in the habit of leaving my big camera bag in the car (or at home if it's hot) and transferring what ever I need for a location to a smaller cheap shoulder camera bag. Not only does this lighten the load, but it makes me look like a tourist instead of a photographer which makes shooting around people and going unnoticed easier for me.
To think that such down-to-earth, honest assessments are, unfortunately, becoming rarer and rarer on social media - covert sponsorship, fanboyism and all. Your vid is great food for thought without sounding patronizing and/or like you're just on a ranting spree. Cheers from a Brazilian street photog who used to love roaming his way through the streets of London, film camera in hand - from W1C to Tower Bridge - when he lived there back in the noughties. Subscribing right now for more and hoping you do something similar to camera systems. ;-)
i feel the same way about camera bags... I use a basic work backpack with a cheap camera insert for when I am biking around. For walking, I love the Domke F2 bag. It is canvas and simple looking. It was designed by a photojournalist who hated normal camera bags. It doesn't look like a camera bag but it has a lot of room for cameras, lenses and accessories
I would agree that the Pro Mists are overhyped but despite that I still find myself using them because it is my preferred look most of the time. Especially with my portraits. I started off with a 1/4 which I only like for video now, but have started using a 1/8 for pictures as it's not too overwhelming.
Yeah, any camera bag with prominent branding or tacticool styling is just a bad idea. The best way to go in my experience is to just get a good normal bag that can fit a camera cube or padding or to get an actual hiking pack and put camera cube(s) in that. There are also some outfitter brands that happen to make camera bags and those tend to be better than many of those made by popular camera brands.
UV Filters - 100% agree I signed up for a photo class and on the first night the tutor ripped into me for not putting UV filters on my lenses. I didn't go back
Hysterical, luv the video. This is the gear that, for me, beat out anything in my collection as keepers though… Bags: 1) think tank airport 2. Works in all planes, used it, abused it. Also doubles as storage for the gear when not in use! 2) think tank turnstyle 20. This bag is light, quick and my constant use bag. Comfortable to wear, I can change lenses while rotating it around to my front. Wish it had more outside pockets but it keeps it light! 3) tenba byob. Love these. Pack my gear into one and chuck it into a nondescript bag. No one knows you are carrying camera gear. Kewl little side pockets holds batteries, small flashes, gels, lens paper! No so good bags? Any shoulder bag… gave up on those as soon as I found the turnstiles. I use them to store gear. Cases: Kaza deluxe for my fuji gear…. Practical, durable, light, great conversation piece, and they add a good grip with the fuji xt3! Pro-mist …. Yeah you can mess a good image… but when you learn how to use them….magic… like night scenes in the rain. Uv filters… guilty… it’s more to protect my sanity than the lens. Camera stores love the upsell! Gorilla tripod… yeah very special use… but keep em in the bag…. Nothing matches it! The big surprise to me was shoulder bags … especially for street photography….. bouncing on you hip like a caffeinated 5 year old, competing with your camera regarding off centered weight… change you shooting pose and it swings around an assaults and/or metoo’s you it’s fine Italian leather…😂. Admit it…. As impractical as a teaspoon in chunky soup!
after much research and 40+ years of photography, amateur and professional i tend to agree about bags, BUT not the one you mention, i use a protactic 450, big bag , i carry two bodies, three lenses (ic 150-600) plus batteries, flash rain cover , netbook etc. I do 100% agree all that kit in a non backpack style bag will give backache.
I agree on the Gorilla Pod. Bought it, used it once, and since then it has not seen the light of day. On the other hand I'm really happy with my PD bags in various sizes. Still debating with myself whether I should take the UV filters off my lenses. They've bee living there for years, maybe I take them off he little primes and see whether there's a difference in image quality. Might cause some camera shake for fear of scratches, though ;-)
Spot on about camera bags. I have three. They have become just a means of safely storing various outfits at home or transporting them in my van. When It comes to actually going out and taking photos I use an army surplus canvas bag, a couple of lenses in padded pouches and a flash in the bag and the camera plus lens on a strap over my shoulder or round my neck. I still have enough space for some other odds and sods. If I cut out the flash or the extra lenses I can get the camera and lens in the bag too. I would add lens hoods to the list. Well not actually ALL lens hoods, just many of the ones supplied by the lens manufacturers. They are often too large, too fragile and too easily fall off the lens and get lost and broken. Unless a lens comes supplied with a decent hood I use cheap generic screw in round ones. I have tried all sorts - bayonet hoods, vented hoods, square hoods, petal hoods, hoods that fit over the lens and are secured with a grub screw, hoods that require a special filter adaptor and various combinations of these. All a waste of time and money - just get a screw in round one for few quid.
For photos I would not use the ProMist but for video it is great, especially when there are light sources, also makes the skin look smoother and everything more dreamy.
I kind of agree with your opinion on camera bags. I'm kind of into PeakDesign as a brand so I use an Everyday Bagpack (30 liters) which is quite big so I can hardly imagine it being an everyday bag and yes, normally it works great for me, I can put quite a lot of camera gear inside (two full frame bodies, pretty much all the lenses I need) but when I went hiking I had one camera with a 24-70/4, a 50/1.8 (that I never used but I had it just in case) and I had problems like where to put a jacket, where to put something to eat, a bottle with water, etc. Also, the fact is that the bag is very expensive. So finding some camera cubes that could be put into a normal bag seems like a good solution. About the Pro Fog filters - I think they are more useful for like portraits in a studio, with some interesting lighting (like LED bars with different colours), I would never think about taking them outside for street photography or natural light portraits. So I understand why you think what you think. I don't use UV filters anymore. On my previous crop DSLR I had them for every lens but now I chose not to buy them anymore and I don't see the need to have them. My lenses are doing fine without them. I've never used Gorilla Pod, I see it everywhere on RUclips but I would probably consider it only for either vlogging, or taking advantage of its flexible legs to find some crazy creative angles but honestly I don't know how much it can carry if you do something crazy with the legs. So I think buying a good tripod, even if much more expensive, makes more sense :) Also thanks for the chance to explore London a little bit. I've never been there so hopefully someday I can go and then I will know where to shoot. Cheers!
I bought my first DLSR camera back in 2005 and they sold me a little Lowe camera bag to go with it. Essentially just right to hold the camera and the lens. I still have that and use it when I go out shooting with just a single lens. My other camera bag is a backpack that holds multiple lenses and the camera and it's perfect for travel. But since it only holds a certain number of lenses it also forces me to chose carefully what I want to take along. Camera bags are essential, but it's a good idea to be super fussy while shopping and know precisely how you will use it.
You’re soooooo right about the camera bags…everyone wants the newest and better looking bag pack, which is stupid because at the end it’s just a bag…I’ve bought a 45€ bag pack which is good enough for my Fuji xh1, 3 lenses (primes), a battery grip (which I have off the camera, I rarely use it), 7 filters, batteries and charger and other miscellaneous stuff, plus it’s pretty well built. Also keep in mind that if you’re shooting street, wearing a 300€ enormous bag will definitely make you a target. The only case I would buy a big bag pack is if I was shooting exclusively landscapes.
I'm so happy I found your channel, not many are using fuji cameras, by the way I'm coming in London next year (in LSE) for my master, and I just can't wait to shoot there, I'm so so so excited
I own 2 camera bags. A Chrome one and a Manhattan Portage. Both are good for transporting gear with padding around them. But both really suck for quick access to the camera. Both of them I bought to replace an old Manhattan Portage messenger that is really thrashed. I keep going back to the messenger bag because it's less obvious that it's holding $4k of camera gear, but also I can have my camera in my hand in 1 second without any buckle or velcro noises. I've tried a bunch of filters, some I got with a package deal from B&H or Adorama, some I picked up by themselves. One of the most useful is the polarizing filter. It's the difference between a great shot over a body of water and a boring one. It also works wonderfully on window fronts, classic cars and some kinds of landscape. The UV filters like you said always added CA or flares in random spots.
"...lenses are not made out of cheese." Roman Fox, 2021. I can't disagree with anything here. I've never used Gorillapods or mist filters so I can't say, but with the rest of these I have to admit that they are overhyped and unnecessary. At least for me.
The UV filter stuff is bang on for me. As a beginner I was recommended to protect my lenses with clear UV filters, and exactly as you said now one is on a lens I will not be able to remove anymore without damaging the lens material itself. So yeah not buying those anymore, I'm also a very careful person and take good care of my stuff so unless big accidents happen I should be ok ;)
Definitely look up getting some camera filter wrenches. They're just little plastic loops that grip around the filter and lens barrel but they work a treat! Had a UV filter apparently hammered onto my vintage Olympus 50mm lens by the previous owner that I'd tried everything in my toolbox on to no avail, but I had the thing off in under a minute with a pair of these things. Think I got mine from Speedgraphic here in the UK, but I'm sure they're available online in most countries if your Google-Fu is solid. 👍
Used a UV filter in my early days, but quickly found out it just screws up the quality of my photos, so now I'm perfectly fine doing without. If I already need some sort of lens protection, I'll just apply my lens hood. And vey recognizable regaring the Gorillapod. Thought it would come in handy, tried it a couple of times, and ended up returning it as it wasn't very practical at all in the end.
I remember back in the Dark Ages when I was learning photography (1970's) I used a scrape piece of my Mom's old black stockings and a rubber band to create the look of what we now call a Black Mist filter. It was a long rectangular piece with a hole burned in one end do I could choose to have a clear spot.
100% agree on the camerabag. I have a lowepro terraclime 100 ( I really had to look for the model), which is a medium-to-small shoulderbag that doesn't scream "camera". I always carry my camera with a 18-140 and a 10-24 (both are big sized lenses) plus batteries, remote and a filter. Is not the most padded bag ever but, I've been using it for more than 10 years, traveled all around the world and my gear has never been damaged (because it's always right next to me and not throw away like a regular bag). Good bag
Really good video Roman, balanced and not judgemental. Loved the collection of street images . I’ve certainly gone down the camera bag rabbit hole , back packs, sling bags a variety of brands but I keep coming back to the Think Tank Retrospective series (a shoulder bag) , I mostly use the 30, it didn’t look like a camera bag from the get go and after many years kicking around planes, cars, busses and ferries it still looks decent but even less like there’s $$ inside . As I’ve got much older I’ve really embraced “less is more” when it comes to humping around kg’s of gear. Cheers from NZ
about dedicated Camera Bags yes, there is simply none that can be good in any situation and they are very expensive and very distinctive. Best option in my opinion are inserts that can be moved from a bag to another (or to a backpack) that best fits the situation, larger, smaller, more rough for outdoor activities or more nice and elegant for more "mondane" environments. I ended up pretty much settling for a padded insert in a "transformer" laptop bag that can be used both as a messenger bag or as a backpack. An affordable versatile, stealthy alternative for almost every need can be found among thermal/cooler bags, they are available in many formats/rigidities/shapes/straps arrangements, volumes, colors(they definitely don't scream "expensive gear" as much as branded camera bags, especially in unusual colors), they are usually weatherproof and are made with a load of drink bottles in mind(that's a rather heavy load even compared to photographic gear). The insulation material usually acts as a reasonable padding and they are usually so cheap that you can buy a small assortment of different thermal/cooler bags/backpacks for the price of a single average camera bag. I agree on gorillapods being pointless, they are a nightmare to set up and you can't rely on them being reliably firm, that is usually what you really want from a tripod. In my opinion if you know that when you will need a tripod you will not have a "true" full scale tripod and want at least something similar to always carry inside your bag I would suggest a small but sturdy and versatile "tabletop" tripod like the Manfrotto PIXI. In many situation you can even find a suitable elevated surface(a wall, a pillar, a trash bin, whatever) to place it in subtitution of a true tripod that is not with you. way more convenient and useful than gorillapods
I use a 1/8 black pro mist all the time and it keeps good contrast while slightly blooming highlights naturally and with elegance, an effect you cant get in post.
Fun discussion. Mist filters: not "undoable" but "un-undoable", I think. (Former English major...) Cheap UV filter: Yes, a lens hood is a bit clunky, but it helps a lot to prevent scrapes on the lens surface. Not magic, but helpful. And this San Diego resident has enjoyed much of the walk you have here; very nice to see the sights again.
I've just found this channel ,and you know that saying first impressions, well my first impression is I LIKE IT, at last I'm not trying to be sold something I don't want "YES", good on you Roman, your saying what many of us think, so if you don't mind I'll stick around.
Couldn't agree more with so many of your points. Camera bags make no sense if you're actually traveling. Putting my camera in a separate protected container while keeping the rest of the bag for everything else you needed is much more useful. I also had a clear UV filter wield onto my lens on a trip to Seoul and no one wanted to touch it because they were scared to break the lens trying to remove it. Thankfully I found a Sony store that was willing to risk it and half a day later I learned my lesson.
Wow...nice area to walk around and take photos; thanks for the tour. Wish I had back the money for all the photo bags sitting unused. Now I prefer bags that either are regular bags or are photo bags that look like regular bags...just as you said, no point advertising "expensive photo gear here". For walkabout I prefer to carry the camera, have a wrist or cross body strap (in case of a clumsy moment), and hook it on my belt when 2 hands are needed (ie getting coffee or lunch) ... both the Spider Light and PD Capture systems work well for me. Filters...always have either clear or CPL or ND on lenses, either for effects/exposure or just plain protection. BUT, as you said, get a quality filter for your quality lens. Tripods...rarely use them...more likely to use a monopod but even that not often. You can do a lot handheld, even more now with IBIS and/or OIS. Looking forward to more of your videos.
Agree with all except for the lens filter. I always place filters on all of my lenses but I use either Zeiss or B+W. Think about it, the front element of your lens is splashed with either water, mud, or any gunk. Would you just wipe the front element as is with a cloth? I'd rather wipe the filter anytime as I please instead of getting to risk damaging the front element. Just my 2cents. Great video as always.
About UV filters and lenses actually being sturdy: I had an EF 55mm-250mm that went at least a year and a half without a cap. It got so bad that i managed to break the screw that would hold a new cap/filters but I kept using it. Still produced a ton of images I'm proud of and that I still keep it in my portfolio. I live in a rural area and my camera's happily been through hell with me, but this lens never had a scratch. I traded it for another 55-250, only this was less beat up (and had a cap!)
Roman. So true on bags and UV filters. Bags. Been there, got two or three to sell. All those lovely dividers! You hit the spot. My favourite bag is Crumpler shoulder bag. I bought it in Lewes in that old fashioned entity a chemists that is also a camera shop. Yes one still exists and has nice kit and a range of quality printer papers, books and other lovely stuff. I can get the X-T4 plus 70-300, 15-55, x1.4 and batteries, filters etc. Brill. Listening to you I don't feel like such nugget for having splashed so much cash. I've just bought a Mountain Warehouse Pace 30 for a walking holiday. Camera gear will go in padded containers alongside my sandwiches and flask. Filters. I just followed the crowd and the only time I've been glad I had one on was when my brand new X-T4 took a dive into gorse, mud and gravel on Dartmoor in a rain storm. Otherwise a waste of space. Looks like eBay beckons. Really like the down to earth opinions. Too many people out there trying to flog stuff and it's great to have. realistic and perhaps slightly cynical view.
Regarding the gorilla pod. I actually agree and don't agree at the same time. It's definitely a nightmare to use it for the camera, especially if your (like mine) is worn out and doesn't hold as it did years ago. But I have a gorilla pod with ball head in my bag every time I go to shoot. I use it to mount smaller lights on a tree branch out of sight, railing or anywhere I might need. Basically, as a lightstand it works amazing
I don't own a gorilla pod but I had one in my hands before and I completely agree with you. It only really makes sense for small and light cameras. Something with a similar footprint but made with solid legs makes much more sense since it can carry more weight and be more sturdy while taking up a similar amount of space in your bag.
Bags. I use Camelbak Quantico backpack with padded insert for camera and lenses. I can easily take out the insert and I can pack everything for bushcraft hike or something else. Now I want to make my own custom leather messenger bag (one or two) so that I can fit couple of cameras (analogue and/or digital) and couple of lenses + laptop and some everyday day carry items. I have made a drawing, now I need to print it out in 1:1 ratio and check if everything fits. Than I can put it on the leather, make some stitching holes and start stitching all together. First pancake of course will be burned and ugly, but the second to third one must be perfect. Pro mist filters - I have one thanks to my friend. I know it's not polite to say about gifts but... I hate it. It never gives me any good result and I don't understand why it is needed. Protective filters - I have several but I'm not using super expensive lenses, my lenses all are used and the most expensive cost me 350€ and cheapest cost me 15€ incl. the camera. I have filters on couple of lenses and they are warming filters mostly as I'm shooting film 70% and digital only 30%.
Filters are an old paradigm. With the exception of a circular polarizing filter, you can replace all with post processing and a bit of planning during the shoot e.g. bracketing exposures.
Generally agree with you but a good UV filter is essential in my eyes for protection. Much easier to clean than the front of a lens. I'd rather break a 50 dollar filter than the front of a 1000 dollar lens. I'd also add whatever camera you're using to this list :') the autofocus pulsing was pretty annoying.
That's basically what he said. A good UV is worth it, not a cheap one. So many people breaking some flimsy UV filter and being "glad it wasn't the lens" when the same impact wouldn't have left the tiniest mark on the actual lens. If you like being careless, you're very clumsy or want to keep your gear pristine for selling it later (and buy a filter with good glass) it might be worth it. Not for me though.
On the subject of being obvious. Fjallraven make a photo insert for their Kanken bags. Everyone has a Kanken, they’re all over cities, you blend in perfectly
More photo sense spoken than in most YT videos (and hopefully money saved)! Well done. Love the images of the Shard where I used to work a third of the way up.
About the bag problem: that's why I bought a Tenba camera bag. It *does not* look like a camera back on the outside - exactly what I was looking for. They are also not that overpriced.
Basically agrees with everything you've said, even if I'm still new to photography (less than a year). - 150€ Camera bags that are designed in a way that if you lift them without zipping properly, everything hits the ground. - UV filters that I thought were expensive at 50€.. they reduces too much sharpness so I had to take them off everytime I use the lenses and almost scratch my lense in the process.. - Negative clarity almost never looks good.. and there is a filter for that.. - The gorilla pod.. have one, everytime I've hanged it to a tree, I wished I could move the tree to get the right composition.. For half the price, I could get at least twice as useful And basically, pretty much all these experiences I had, it's because I listened too other youtubers.. and salespersons.. I'm so easily influenced, I wish you realised that video a year ago ^^
Nice one Roman - great location walk through - great tips and I agree with all your comments about gear even though i'm a bit of a camera bag addict lol
Agree with the uv filter, don't use those no longer for many years now. However when using a very expensive magnetic adapter on my 9 mm wide angle, my tripod fell. Ofcourse with lens and adapter/filter on the rocks. I can tell you rocks are way harder....had to use pliers too to unscrew the adapter and the thread of the lens was scratched but still useful afterwards.( luckily). It taught me to be extra careful when using a tripod. The Risk for going through that with a UV......no way, I leave it in the shop.
I have a UV filter on all my lenses and have never seen adverse affects in the images (although I do invest in good ones). I’m not so concerned about banging the front element of a lens as I am about other factors. It is much easier to clean the filter than the lens, and damage to the front element of the lens from cleaning is not uncommon. The UV filter provides superior water protection. (The lenses I’ve owned have all specified that their dust and water protection are only applicable if a filter is used on the front of the lens.) Canon has recommended using UV filters for water protection , and my most recent Sigma lens included a Sigma UV filter as lens protector. Only once have I had a stuck UV filter on a lens, and that came off pretty easily with a properly sized (and cheap) plastic filter wrench. When I purchase a lens I just factor in the cost of a filter from a reputable manufacturer.
I have a shit load of Camera Bags, 34! I only regularly use 4 of them. The one I use by far the most isn't one of the pricey big name models, it is an Endurex extra large backpack ($109). It is the bag of choice every time I fly. It is about the right combination of capacity, compartments, lightweight, and can just barely fit under an airline seat. I have added extra shoulderstrap pads because the ones it has were never meant for the load I put in the bag and due to the bag's advanced age (going on 6 years) they are not as effective as they once were. Otherwise the bag is in great shape still.
I bought a cheap Amazon Basics bag about a decade ago, and was amazed by the quality. I'm still using it today and have 2 Canon 6D bodies and L lenses in it. It's a very good bag with lots of pockets and straps for tripod etc. I wouldn't walk around with it at an event though, as it says "Amazon Basics" on the zippers, lol. It stays at home.
Thanks for naming Gorilla Pods for what they really are: crap. I'm with you in the UV filter section. These shards had a meaning, sure. In the Alps. On a sunny day. While shooting film to avoid snow looking like the snow outside a pub. Since then, they're shards with a screw. Bags - well, depends. I got some which are heavy and shout out "mugg her" when I wear them. But from a certain amount of gear needed, there's no way to avoid them. And yes, they are mainly overpriced. Well, at least as long as you are not into Louis Vuitton and Chanel. Their price tags for their bags set you somewhat back into an understanding of what REAL rip-off is. My perfectly fine peak design tote at least is cheap - for a well-made tote - and is a great camera bag. The filter thingie. As I started off using Photoshop on a professional level with the sacred one-floppy-version 1.01 maybe around your 2nd birthday... well, that makes me a) ancient and b) quite profound in using it. And I strongly disagree with the whole using PSD to recreate filter effects. Why? Well, it simply doesn't work. As you said, 80 percent or so. Yeah, but the other 20 make the difference. Even worse: Photoshop was never really intended for that. The magic of Photoshop, the real reason why I still believe that it is divine code that was stolen in heaven by archangel Kai Krause, had and has its inherent beauty in creating from zero - or modifying images into abstraction. I'll never forget the days (and nights) spent in front of Quadra 950ies and the first Power Macs, waiting for Kais Power Tools to finish their work. Believe me, rave was not invented on turntables and mixers, it was invented by flyer gurus and fanzine designers...
Definitely with you about pro-mist filter effects and Photoshop, though to me it's more than just the technical question of whether PS can actually recreate the effect of using the real filter on your lens. It probably can't completely replicate it for now, but even if there was a built-in button that could do it perfectly, I really think there's something to be said for taking creative risks in the moment and capturing things in camera rather than second-guessing it all by poring over it for hours in the edit. We're always safer in our creative decisions in the edit than we are in the moment, and while I think that's great if you're a pro shooting an event for a client, it's pretty terrible if you're an artist trying to create something of genuine artistic value.
First time watching one of your videos, so excuse me if I misspeak. If I'm not mistaken this seems to be a primarily photo focused channel. On the topic of filters, especially the pro mist filters, I definitely agree that the effect can be added in post for photography. For film/video, this is much harder to do and hence what they're primarily intended for. I think this also how they ended up becoming popular in modern photography since there are so many hybrid shooters. For video, they're a great tool, but I agree if your focus is just stills, save your money and learn to edit in the effect.
Beautiful scenery. I agree completely, especially about the bags and the useless gorilla pod. Mine went into the trash years ago. You can also easily overspend on tripods - either too expensives ones, or just too many. The catch-22 is lenses. Do I really need to keep all those lenses my father used? I always say yes... but it really is too much.
I avoided the pro mist filters, but the rest ... totally agree. Ironically, a couple of months ago, I switched from a Lowepro bag to a generic bag with an F-Stop insert.
100% agree with Gorilla Pods. Too much wobble even with a 2 sec delay, moves on smooth railings, takes ages to set up, falls over if you have a medium/large lense and looks like a beads.
Camera bags? I‘m a bag nerd!😂 I have 4 bags. One dedicated camera bag Wandrd Prvke 21L but I take it to the office everyday (with a camera inside. Next I have PD Everyday Sling 6L for when I only want to take one camera&one lens. Then I have a regular backpack (Dsptch Daybag) that was my main bag for many years but is now only used when I need a bag with space and not necessarily a camera. Last, I have a messenger bag that can be fastened on the back like the Everyday Sling. That was also my main bag for some years. It has lots of space and a big laptop compartment. I agree with you about UV-filters. The only camera/lens that has a uv filter on is my X100S because it came with one when I bought it second-hand. Gorillapods are pretty useless, as you have said. They were the rage back then because all these influencers (PMK!) used them and promoted them, but they are overprices and build like crap.
The manfrotto elements folds tiny so no issue to put it in my 16l day bag. I also have a smaller set up of a mini gimbal tripod and an extension pole…. i need to do an updated camera bag video later this year :)
On the subject of cheap light bags .... Tenba Packlite Travel bag ( fits a Tenba BYOB 9) £16.99 and Duragadget five pocket insert £13.99 .... both from ebay. The Duragadget insert also goes into a plain canvas bag that I bought from Asda for £9.99 two years ago.
Totally agree. Even a small scratch on a lens is too close to affect the image as its way out of focus.finher prints, dust rain marks etc have way less affect than a flare from a uv filter. Gorilla pods are a waste of time as they are impossible to hold. Camera straps are another thing I leave in the box as a small bag works better for me. For bags it's best to carry a sling diaper bag, just remember to take the used ones out. Many a mom can tell you how much crap literally you can fit in it, and no right minded thief will rummage in there. The bottle is usable for water and the pampers add padding. Seriously a simple nylon sling is more than adequate and super light
It's so refreshing to hear someone talk in Kilos. 🙂
Yeah. Metric systen is the proper system.
Um...that's English, duh. 🙄
He's British rather than N American, so not very surprising. Only older British people use lbs/oz now, and not all of them. Most commonly we encounter these units in recipes. Anyway when your currency is Pounds (sterling) and the price of gear comes up often with Roman's subject then the confusion is unwanted.
When I started watching photography videos several years ago on RUclips, nearly everyone I encountered with English or Australian and they used metric all the time obviously although sometimes they would not use it. Since I know both the metric system very well and the US English system very well, and since I'm American, it doesn't bother me because it helps me reinforce my knowledge of the metric system. I prefer the metric system anyway.
I enjoyed the talk about the camera gear, but I absolutely loved the photo walk with composition tips in between. Please keep on doing that!
The whole point of a camera bag with huge logo on it is to make sure everyone knows you're a photographer. So I have a cheap, generic bag for my cheap, vintage lenses. I also bought a surplus backpack from Czech army - it's rubber-coated for weather proofing. It's on the heavy side, but I don't mind additional exercise...
It's very helpful for thieves.
Do you prefer nobody knows you’re a photographer?
@@JimiCanRead, I prefer not advertising that I might have expensive gear in my bag...
@@urgon6321 Shoot film and you don't have to worry about having expensive gear lol. Olympus XA2 super sharp, Rollei 35 XF also supper sharp. Neither break $100 lol
@@Zetaphotography, believe it or not, but I have a collection of old analog cameras. Unfortunately with my eyesight I can't shoot any of them via viewfinder. So I use a mirrorless instead...
Camerabags. Been there, done that. Too many empty and unused bags in random closets or the attic.
I disagree regarding your UV-filter point. Everything that is THAT close to the lens opening, will not render unless it is an effect filter like a promist, or a polarizing filter.
Try to make a small dot on a UV-filter and see if you can see it. It won't render onto the censor. I've done tests to see if I can notice different quality UV-filters. I couldn't. There are several tests on the net that claim to see a colour shift, but online you can't see what they are talking about. Almost all tests I've seen haven't even shown a noticable shaprness decrease in the real world.
I find it better to regularly clean my UV-filter than it is to clean the lens element. Some of my fuji lenses are quite small, and I can't always get rid of all the oils that tend to get pushed to the sides.
I think statements like "why put cheap glass in front of expensive glass!" makes it sound like such an obvious negative that few people test the assumption. It just 'makes sense', and so the myth lives on.
It makes sense to me too, but in practice I can't see much impact on my shots
Haha - by the same token, a small ding on your lens will not have any impact on the image. I religiously use a lens hood. Improves the contrast and protects the lens.
UV filters are a complete waste of money imho. If they work for you, absolutely go for it. But the exact same thing you said about the UV-filter applies to the surface of the lens as well - you won't see any small imperfections and if you have to clean the surface of the glass, even a couple of t-shirt-wipes will do (I generally find the rugged, rounded lens surface easier to clean than filter glass). For protection against impact and rain, lens hoods are much better.
However, I think it's good you make a point for cheap UV-Filters. Crazy price tags for UV-filters are borderline criminal
@@crazysheepfilms Yes, I agree with the scratches on the front element. Normally they won't show, but they'll decrease the resell value. Many UV-filters are overpriced! I only use those brands I like and trust. And on my X100 I need a filter to keep it WR
@@jeremyhendersonphotography It wont't show if it is small enough, but it can decrease the resell value
When it comes to filters, there's only 2 I use... Polarizing (can't edit out reflections in Photoshop) and ND filters. UV are a waste of money, even if you want to protect the lens, just put a hood on it. You will get better contrast in your images anyway in certain light and reduce flares.
I think the concern is around cleaning for most people. Yes a hood provides a lot of protection from direct impacts, but when eventually you want to clean dust or some minor splash off, if your cloth has hard dust in it, or one of the bits of dust on the lens is harder rock type dust or dirt you could scratch during cleaning. With a near 0 stop filter you can be less paranoid, clean more regularly, and replace every few years if scratches appear.
@@artgreen6915 True, that's why I hardly ever touch my lens. Always use a blower. If anything else it on it, I'm very careful when wiping it
@@artgreen6915 I'm with Roman though, that unless you spend a *lot* on a clear or UV filter then you're always sacrificing a little image quality when you use them. Honestly, do what I did when I was deciding if I should stop using them and try shooting the same scenes with and without the filter for a bit, especially in stable lighting conditions so you can make direct comparisons. I always found the images without the relatively cheap Hoya or Tiffen filters I was using had slightly better colours and contrast straight out of camera and needed less editing. For situations where it's raining or very dusty, or if I'm shooting a gig with lots of sweat and beer, I'll still throw on a filter to protect the lens, but for most situations I'd rather just have a hood to protect the front element from most small knocks than have a filter that's actually detracting from my image quality, even if only slightly.
I like this channel, but this video would've benefited greatly from some pickup/insert shots of the various things discussed. As an example, when discussing the pro mist filters and the blooming, you should've shown a couple sample pics and likewise for the similar affect you can achieve in Photoshop. Same when discussing the tripods (e.g., should've shown the problems and the solutions tripods)
Indeed. A prime example of "don't just tell, show it".
Whoever is interested to know more can simply search videos for these things.
@@sleepless51 we could, sure. But we should also strive to make videos better, this is just lazy RUclips video making.
isnt the point that he didn't buy them?😂 @@MickBenjamins
A physiotherapist told me years ago that one of the easiest ways to a bad back is to carry a single shoulder-strap camera-bag with a camera and a couple of lenses for a day, She advised me to get a small rucksack and wear it properly. Unfortunately, by the time she told me this the damage had already been done.
Worst purchase ever--- a really strong camera bag with heavy-duty nylon fittings, D-rings and hooks, specifically for the once in a lifetime wildlife safari holiday. It's not until you get to the really eerily quiet, early mornings, when you can hear a pin drop and the smallest sound carries for miles, that you realise that a nylon D-ring and the strap's nylon hook squeak as they rub against each other with every step you take. It doesn't make you the most popular person with either the early-morning animals or the other photographers!!!
Excellent video with some new takes on old vantage points. I'll re-visit some of them now that the autumn brings a more realistic time for 'early-morning' sunrise photographs.
The discussion about being crap for regular use is probably why I love the Peak Design messenger bag so much, the dividers just fold over and around to fit whatever I'm wanting to take that day. I didn't realize how useful that'd but I've yet to go "Darn the bag would be big enough to hold all this stuff I want but I just can't get them in". Much better than the other camera bags I've had in the past
I can agree with you 100%. Two drawers full of stuff are my witnesses. During the last stripping out, I built a macro stand out of flash rails, ball heads, magic arms, quick-release clamps and plates, L-rails, screws and a center column. But the drawers are still full.
I find the 1/8 and 1/4 pro mists invaluable. Love that look. I don’t see myself getting tired of it, been 15 years.
As an amateur photographer and architecture background person I liked this video a lot. Reminds me of when I was in London 2 years ago photographing and framing the architecture there.
This channel has got me starting to look into street photography. Thanks!
Tupperware containers lined with closed cell foam inside an ergonomic rucksack - been doing it for over 30 years. Pro Mist filters are highly overated - try a Nikon Soft No 1, it’s really subtle, controllable and fantastic on skin tones. UV filters, I spend a fortune on them - run a pencil lead around the threads and they will never bind. Gorilla Pods - pointless.
Good honest points well made. No hype, no crap just truth based upon experience. You get my vote having been there too. Wish this video came out 4 years ago. Great job Roman. 👌
I really enjoy this mix of a walkaround combined with the content
It is such a light-hearted video, got me laughing on the gorilla tripod for sure. All valid points and I am happy to know I am not alone. I really appreciate your videos.
Snap on Gorilla pod.
Monopod will forever be my favorite gear lol. No need to set up legs, and I always have a clean steady shot, and walking stick lol. Idk why more people don’t use them. Of course, it could never replace a tripod for astrophotography, self shots, etc.
Camera bags - my pet peev is that majority of them are designed by marketing departments who make arbitrary guesses about what the compartments should be like. I like my DSLRs with vertical grips - good luck trying to find a backpack for that. Then once you loaded up your backpack while laid down, you'd find out that either everything collapses down on itself while in the upright carry position and/or you couldn't pull anything out of it without losing half your other things falling on the ground. And don't get me started on weather proof materials. There are few companies who address those issues but they charge a premium so high that it competes with other gear expenses and loses its value. My best experiences were with good'ol photographer's shoulder bag and a motorcycle backpack.
As for UV filters - it took me a looong time to figure out what those star ghosts were on the nightscape photos - a many lost times/locations never to be repeated again - hard lessons. I still use'em though, but now I am deliberate about the choices and it's only in crap weather/conditions, when i know i'll be wiping sh!t off many times without worrying what muck was there to start with. And yes, I killed one filter but saved the lens once. What i don't use UV filter for is to cut the UV light - that's the dumbest idea ever - unless you're using quartz lenses, in which case why are you complaning about UV 😄
Totally agree with you in all camera gear, even though I’m very picky to what I add or purchase, I’ve done my fair share of hype purchases and all theses items you mentioned not only have costed a lot of money (luckily I’ve sold them), but also have been useless. Now I’ve kept everything to a minimal and has been a tons better for the wallet, back and for the creative process.
Also, great tips and photos mate!
Use filter wrenches to remove stuck filters, a soft sided cooler as your camera bag and a monopod for walkaround fotos.
soft sided cooler: brilliant! love this idea.
I'm not sure I can agree with the bags section. Depends entirely on what you do of course but having a nice camera bag is essential for me personally. For local shoots that I may need a full kit with, I take a Tenba DNA Messenger 16 Pro. Fits 1-2 bodies and 2-3 larger lenses in it no problem. Can also take the insert out completely and it's just a nice large bag. I have a Lowepro 350 AW II that I took to Iceland with a full kit that I needed, which with its hard shell/padding and quick access to the waterproof cover helped me a great deal in weird weather. If it's just a day trip around town or something we're talking about, the Brevite bags can also be used as camera bags or just standard backpacks. Low profile and good quality. I just wish the camera pocket opened from the back instead of the front. I even have a sling for if I'm just walking around and want to carry a single camera/lens combo. A good bag should never be underestimated.
Similarly, a nice UV filter can cost 60-120 USD that WILL protect that front element. I've dropped a $2400 lens right on its front and the only reason the front element wasn't mangled in some rock/gravel is due to having a filter on the front. Quality ones don't impact IQ at all, either.
After my father died I inherited a little bit of money. Not much, but enough to buy any camera I wanted including a Leica. I chose the Fuji XT4 that came with the 16-80 mm and one nice strap. I don’t even use a camera bag. I have an old canvas side bag that allows a quick tuck of the camera on the fly. Other than that? That’s it really. I bought one prime lens and barely even use it. I find that by limiting myself, I’m actually freeing myself. I’m very happy with my limitations. I suggest everyone else try it. ✌️
Yeah you’re spot on!
I can say the following regarding Filters: there are professional uses of filters and you would rent it for exactly the purpose you need. The Pro mist Filter is a filter that you very often use on professional film Shootings. We also use haze and other things to get away the clean air. So that the light can show off. And the others thing is, that you may simulate filter in post, but sometimes I take pictures with and without filter and combine them! And you can see something instant that you will only see later in post. So it’s helpful to learn too. But maybe 🤔 I am to nerdy about that. I just love to shoot with filter.
I was looking at these promist filters and they are definitely not cheap… in the end I found it is easy to make a similar effect in Affinity Photo (or PS I am sure) by selecting highlights and applying a blur. As you say you can then adjust the intensity to your heart’s content as well! Good video, I can’t wait to get back into London.
I prefer the glimmer glass. It's effective enough for stuff I shoot.
The Domke bags have been my favorites for many years exactly because of their light weight.
Was going to make the same comment.. Domke's are strong light and have a neutral appearance if you get a dark colour... I got my first one back in 1985 and have just purchased the 803 messenger bag for my Fuji cameras.
RE: Pro-mist.. got one in a video filter set, never used it...
Re: UV, I personally do use then as I don't use but rather lose lens caps...
RE: Gorilla pod.. got given one.. agree rubbish, but I only use a tripod for video..or for photos when using a 600mm or longer for say cricket or other sports otherwise never needed one... A monopod does a better job for most situations.. but for 200mm and below never used one.
Totally agree with the UV filters I keep a lens hood on when I'm photographing in the city that offers enough protection.
One, of many, of the things I love about Roman’s channel is that he’s always direct, honest, and to the point through his EXPERIENCE…and never acts arrogant or hiding his knowledge from you. Not many people like him on RUclips/social media. Definitely a class act with the photo skills to back it all up!
Strongly agree with everything except the mist filters. I like their look, and I think it's just a warning about using them properly, like any filter. I wouldn't settle for post processing, firstly because I have much more confidence in my photographic skills than my photoshop skills, but more importantly because I want to spend my time outside taking photos, and minimise my time sitting in front of a PC processing images. That said I do take your point that some peoples' expectations about these filters are either misplaced or overrated.
The bag that I am using only costs $7, but it can carry 5 apsc lenses plus a lot of small accessories such as battery and sd card. What's more, its design is pretty simple and practical, allowing me to switch lens in less than 15 seconds. And it's lightweight. However this camera bag was manufactured by a little-known manufacturer.
I shoot film only, and mostly medium format. I (nearly) fully agree with all of your points. My partial exception would be the UV or clear filter. UV light can degrade film images. Further, as I am mostly out in mother nature, I have to contend with blowing dust, rain, and such, where that filter keeps me from having to clean/wipe dry my lens front element. I use lens hoods, so I do not value what little physical protection such a filter might afford. I acquired must of my filters 25-40 years ago, when they did not command the ridiculous prices charged today. I use these and other filters only when circumstances require. "Gorilla Pod", I remember when they first came out, thinking that they were about the dumbest sucker bait junk I'd seen in years.
So nice to see someone doing the almost exact same walk I did in the summer with a friend. Great suggestions on the angles, and shots. I agree pretty much with everything you said. Bags have become a bug-bear. I've got so many of them, and none of them are perfect. As I've got older, I've wanted lighter equipment, and the bags just add too much weight to it. I've just got a small 10L backpack that seems better, and doesn't scream camera bag, so hoping that will work for me. As for gorilla pods, yes, I have one, and never use it. UV filters I don't use. I moved from Canon to Olympus a few years ago, mainly because the Canon was just too heavy, but then I found out about Olyumpus's Live Bulb mode, and that was a complete game changer for long exposure night photography. Seems like you are a London photographer, like me. Cool!
Been using high quality uv filters for 17 years because I hate using or remembering lens caps and have found every year I need to replace them because they get a ton of micro scratches that otherwise would have been on my expensive lens.. I do have a problem with camera bags and no matter how many I try I always go back to my Think Tank retrospective 5 that nothing else seems to do what I want. I don't worry to much about being robbed because I live in one of those places where I am allowed to be armed for self protection.
Good video. Got a bad back myself and have gotten in the habit of leaving my big camera bag in the car (or at home if it's hot) and transferring what ever I need for a location to a smaller cheap shoulder camera bag. Not only does this lighten the load, but it makes me look like a tourist instead of a photographer which makes shooting around people and going unnoticed easier for me.
To think that such down-to-earth, honest assessments are, unfortunately, becoming rarer and rarer on social media - covert sponsorship, fanboyism and all.
Your vid is great food for thought without sounding patronizing and/or like you're just on a ranting spree.
Cheers from a Brazilian street photog who used to love roaming his way through the streets of London, film camera in hand - from W1C to Tower Bridge - when he lived there back in the noughties.
Subscribing right now for more and hoping you do something similar to camera systems. ;-)
i feel the same way about camera bags... I use a basic work backpack with a cheap camera insert for when I am biking around. For walking, I love the Domke F2 bag. It is canvas and simple looking. It was designed by a photojournalist who hated normal camera bags. It doesn't look like a camera bag but it has a lot of room for cameras, lenses and accessories
Domke bags are great. I have the J1 and the F6.
I would agree that the Pro Mists are overhyped but despite that I still find myself using them because it is my preferred look most of the time. Especially with my portraits. I started off with a 1/4 which I only like for video now, but have started using a 1/8 for pictures as it's not too overwhelming.
Yeah, any camera bag with prominent branding or tacticool styling is just a bad idea. The best way to go in my experience is to just get a good normal bag that can fit a camera cube or padding or to get an actual hiking pack and put camera cube(s) in that. There are also some outfitter brands that happen to make camera bags and those tend to be better than many of those made by popular camera brands.
UV Filters - 100% agree
I signed up for a photo class and on the first night the tutor ripped into me for not putting UV filters on my lenses.
I didn't go back
this made me laugh and I would have done the same lol
Hysterical, luv the video.
This is the gear that, for me, beat out anything in my collection as keepers though…
Bags:
1) think tank airport 2. Works in all planes, used it, abused it. Also doubles as storage for the gear when not in use!
2) think tank turnstyle 20. This bag is light, quick and my constant use bag. Comfortable to wear, I can change lenses while rotating it around to my front. Wish it had more outside pockets but it keeps it light!
3) tenba byob. Love these. Pack my gear into one and chuck it into a nondescript bag. No one knows you are carrying camera gear. Kewl little side pockets holds batteries, small flashes, gels, lens paper!
No so good bags? Any shoulder bag… gave up on those as soon as I found the turnstiles. I use them to store gear.
Cases:
Kaza deluxe for my fuji gear…. Practical, durable, light, great conversation piece, and they add a good grip with the fuji xt3!
Pro-mist …. Yeah you can mess a good image… but when you learn how to use them….magic… like night scenes in the rain.
Uv filters… guilty… it’s more to protect my sanity than the lens. Camera stores love the upsell!
Gorilla tripod… yeah very special use… but keep em in the bag…. Nothing matches it!
The big surprise to me was shoulder bags … especially for street photography….. bouncing on you hip like a caffeinated 5 year old, competing with your camera regarding off centered weight… change you shooting pose and it swings around an assaults and/or metoo’s you it’s fine Italian leather…😂. Admit it…. As impractical as a teaspoon in chunky soup!
after much research and 40+ years of photography, amateur and professional i tend to agree about bags, BUT not the one you mention, i use a protactic 450, big bag , i carry two bodies, three lenses (ic 150-600) plus batteries, flash rain cover , netbook etc. I do 100% agree all that kit in a non backpack style bag will give backache.
I agree on the Gorilla Pod. Bought it, used it once, and since then it has not seen the light of day. On the other hand I'm really happy with my PD bags in various sizes. Still debating with myself whether I should take the UV filters off my lenses. They've bee living there for years, maybe I take them off he little primes and see whether there's a difference in image quality. Might cause some camera shake for fear of scratches, though ;-)
Spot on about camera bags. I have three. They have become just a means of safely storing various outfits at home or transporting them in my van. When It comes to actually going out and taking photos I use an army surplus canvas bag, a couple of lenses in padded pouches and a flash in the bag and the camera plus lens on a strap over my shoulder or round my neck. I still have enough space for some other odds and sods. If I cut out the flash or the extra lenses I can get the camera and lens in the bag too.
I would add lens hoods to the list. Well not actually ALL lens hoods, just many of the ones supplied by the lens manufacturers. They are often too large, too fragile and too easily fall off the lens and get lost and broken. Unless a lens comes supplied with a decent hood I use cheap generic screw in round ones. I have tried all sorts - bayonet hoods, vented hoods, square hoods, petal hoods, hoods that fit over the lens and are secured with a grub screw, hoods that require a special filter adaptor and various combinations of these. All a waste of time and money - just get a screw in round one for few quid.
For photos I would not use the ProMist but for video it is great, especially when there are light sources, also makes the skin look smoother and everything more dreamy.
I kind of agree with your opinion on camera bags. I'm kind of into PeakDesign as a brand so I use an Everyday Bagpack (30 liters) which is quite big so I can hardly imagine it being an everyday bag and yes, normally it works great for me, I can put quite a lot of camera gear inside (two full frame bodies, pretty much all the lenses I need) but when I went hiking I had one camera with a 24-70/4, a 50/1.8 (that I never used but I had it just in case) and I had problems like where to put a jacket, where to put something to eat, a bottle with water, etc. Also, the fact is that the bag is very expensive. So finding some camera cubes that could be put into a normal bag seems like a good solution.
About the Pro Fog filters - I think they are more useful for like portraits in a studio, with some interesting lighting (like LED bars with different colours), I would never think about taking them outside for street photography or natural light portraits. So I understand why you think what you think.
I don't use UV filters anymore. On my previous crop DSLR I had them for every lens but now I chose not to buy them anymore and I don't see the need to have them. My lenses are doing fine without them.
I've never used Gorilla Pod, I see it everywhere on RUclips but I would probably consider it only for either vlogging, or taking advantage of its flexible legs to find some crazy creative angles but honestly I don't know how much it can carry if you do something crazy with the legs. So I think buying a good tripod, even if much more expensive, makes more sense :)
Also thanks for the chance to explore London a little bit. I've never been there so hopefully someday I can go and then I will know where to shoot. Cheers!
I bought my first DLSR camera back in 2005 and they sold me a little Lowe camera bag to go with it. Essentially just right to hold the camera and the lens. I still have that and use it when I go out shooting with just a single lens. My other camera bag is a backpack that holds multiple lenses and the camera and it's perfect for travel. But since it only holds a certain number of lenses it also forces me to chose carefully what I want to take along. Camera bags are essential, but it's a good idea to be super fussy while shopping and know precisely how you will use it.
Really enjoyed this, especially your informative spot of interest around the city throughout. Thanks Roman!
You’re soooooo right about the camera bags…everyone wants the newest and better looking bag pack, which is stupid because at the end it’s just a bag…I’ve bought a 45€ bag pack which is good enough for my Fuji xh1, 3 lenses (primes), a battery grip (which I have off the camera, I rarely use it), 7 filters, batteries and charger and other miscellaneous stuff, plus it’s pretty well built.
Also keep in mind that if you’re shooting street, wearing a 300€ enormous bag will definitely make you a target. The only case I would buy a big bag pack is if I was shooting exclusively landscapes.
100% agree on all points. Thought I was the only one that had come to these conclusions... nice to know there's at least one other out there 👌Cheers!
I'm so happy I found your channel, not many are using fuji cameras, by the way I'm coming in London next year (in LSE) for my master, and I just can't wait to shoot there, I'm so so so excited
I own 2 camera bags. A Chrome one and a Manhattan Portage.
Both are good for transporting gear with padding around them. But both really suck for quick access to the camera.
Both of them I bought to replace an old Manhattan Portage messenger that is really thrashed.
I keep going back to the messenger bag because it's less obvious that it's holding $4k of camera gear, but also I can have my camera in my hand in 1 second without any buckle or velcro noises.
I've tried a bunch of filters, some I got with a package deal from B&H or Adorama, some I picked up by themselves.
One of the most useful is the polarizing filter. It's the difference between a great shot over a body of water and a boring one.
It also works wonderfully on window fronts, classic cars and some kinds of landscape.
The UV filters like you said always added CA or flares in random spots.
"...lenses are not made out of cheese." Roman Fox, 2021.
I can't disagree with anything here. I've never used Gorillapods or mist filters so I can't say, but with the rest of these I have to admit that they are overhyped and unnecessary. At least for me.
The UV filter stuff is bang on for me. As a beginner I was recommended to protect my lenses with clear UV filters, and exactly as you said now one is on a lens I will not be able to remove anymore without damaging the lens material itself. So yeah not buying those anymore, I'm also a very careful person and take good care of my stuff so unless big accidents happen I should be ok ;)
Great stuff! Love the photo walk tips and I’ve absolutely had that same issue with UV filters getting jammed onto a lens.
Definitely look up getting some camera filter wrenches. They're just little plastic loops that grip around the filter and lens barrel but they work a treat! Had a UV filter apparently hammered onto my vintage Olympus 50mm lens by the previous owner that I'd tried everything in my toolbox on to no avail, but I had the thing off in under a minute with a pair of these things. Think I got mine from Speedgraphic here in the UK, but I'm sure they're available online in most countries if your Google-Fu is solid. 👍
Love it! I will add the microfiber clothes… my first camera - Sony DSC 300h is still alive with occasional wipes with my T-shirt.
Used a UV filter in my early days, but quickly found out it just screws up the quality of my photos, so now I'm perfectly fine doing without. If I already need some sort of lens protection, I'll just apply my lens hood.
And vey recognizable regaring the Gorillapod. Thought it would come in handy, tried it a couple of times, and ended up returning it as it wasn't very practical at all in the end.
I remember back in the Dark Ages when I was learning photography (1970's) I used a scrape piece of my Mom's old black stockings and a rubber band to create the look of what we now call a Black Mist filter. It was a long rectangular piece with a hole burned in one end do I could choose to have a clear spot.
100% agree on the camerabag. I have a lowepro terraclime 100 ( I really had to look for the model), which is a medium-to-small shoulderbag that doesn't scream "camera". I always carry my camera with a 18-140 and a 10-24 (both are big sized lenses) plus batteries, remote and a filter. Is not the most padded bag ever but, I've been using it for more than 10 years, traveled all around the world and my gear has never been damaged (because it's always right next to me and not throw away like a regular bag). Good bag
Really good video Roman, balanced and not judgemental. Loved the collection of street images . I’ve certainly gone down the camera bag rabbit hole , back packs, sling bags a variety of brands but I keep coming back to the Think Tank Retrospective series (a shoulder bag) , I mostly use the 30, it didn’t look like a camera bag from the get go and after many years kicking around planes, cars, busses and ferries it still looks decent but even less like there’s $$ inside . As I’ve got much older I’ve really embraced “less is more” when it comes to humping around kg’s of gear. Cheers from NZ
about dedicated Camera Bags yes, there is simply none that can be good in any situation and they are very expensive and very distinctive. Best option in my opinion are inserts that can be moved from a bag to another (or to a backpack) that best fits the situation, larger, smaller, more rough for outdoor activities or more nice and elegant for more "mondane" environments. I ended up pretty much settling for a padded insert in a "transformer" laptop bag that can be used both as a messenger bag or as a backpack. An affordable versatile, stealthy alternative for almost every need can be found among thermal/cooler bags, they are available in many formats/rigidities/shapes/straps arrangements, volumes, colors(they definitely don't scream "expensive gear" as much as branded camera bags, especially in unusual colors), they are usually weatherproof and are made with a load of drink bottles in mind(that's a rather heavy load even compared to photographic gear). The insulation material usually acts as a reasonable padding and they are usually so cheap that you can buy a small assortment of different thermal/cooler bags/backpacks for the price of a single average camera bag.
I agree on gorillapods being pointless, they are a nightmare to set up and you can't rely on them being reliably firm, that is usually what you really want from a tripod. In my opinion if you know that when you will need a tripod you will not have a "true" full scale tripod and want at least something similar to always carry inside your bag I would suggest a small but sturdy and versatile "tabletop" tripod like the Manfrotto PIXI. In many situation you can even find a suitable elevated surface(a wall, a pillar, a trash bin, whatever) to place it in subtitution of a true tripod that is not with you. way more convenient and useful than gorillapods
I use a 1/8 black pro mist all the time and it keeps good contrast while slightly blooming highlights naturally and with elegance, an effect you cant get in post.
Fun discussion.
Mist filters: not "undoable" but "un-undoable", I think. (Former English major...)
Cheap UV filter: Yes, a lens hood is a bit clunky, but it helps a lot to prevent scrapes on the lens surface. Not magic, but helpful.
And this San Diego resident has enjoyed much of the walk you have here; very nice to see the sights again.
I've just found this channel ,and you know that saying first impressions, well my first impression is I LIKE IT, at last I'm not trying to be sold something I don't want "YES", good on you Roman, your saying what many of us think, so if you don't mind I'll stick around.
Couldn't agree more with so many of your points. Camera bags make no sense if you're actually traveling. Putting my camera in a separate protected container while keeping the rest of the bag for everything else you needed is much more useful. I also had a clear UV filter wield onto my lens on a trip to Seoul and no one wanted to touch it because they were scared to break the lens trying to remove it. Thankfully I found a Sony store that was willing to risk it and half a day later I learned my lesson.
Wow...nice area to walk around and take photos; thanks for the tour.
Wish I had back the money for all the photo bags sitting unused. Now I prefer bags that either are regular bags or are photo bags that look like regular bags...just as you said, no point advertising "expensive photo gear here". For walkabout I prefer to carry the camera, have a wrist or cross body strap (in case of a clumsy moment), and hook it on my belt when 2 hands are needed (ie getting coffee or lunch) ... both the Spider Light and PD Capture systems work well for me.
Filters...always have either clear or CPL or ND on lenses, either for effects/exposure or just plain protection. BUT, as you said, get a quality filter for your quality lens.
Tripods...rarely use them...more likely to use a monopod but even that not often. You can do a lot handheld, even more now with IBIS and/or OIS.
Looking forward to more of your videos.
Very informative and all to the point. 👍
Agree with all except for the lens filter. I always place filters on all of my lenses but I use either Zeiss or B+W. Think about it, the front element of your lens is splashed with either water, mud, or any gunk. Would you just wipe the front element as is with a cloth? I'd rather wipe the filter anytime as I please instead of getting to risk damaging the front element. Just my 2cents. Great video as always.
I'm so glad I found your channel. Fabulous photography and lots of good information.
About UV filters and lenses actually being sturdy:
I had an EF 55mm-250mm that went at least a year and a half without a cap. It got so bad that i managed to break the screw that would hold a new cap/filters but I kept using it.
Still produced a ton of images I'm proud of and that I still keep it in my portfolio. I live in a rural area and my camera's happily been through hell with me, but this lens never had a scratch. I traded it for another 55-250, only this was less beat up (and had a cap!)
Roman. So true on bags and UV filters.
Bags. Been there, got two or three to sell. All those lovely dividers! You hit the spot.
My favourite bag is Crumpler shoulder bag. I bought it in Lewes in that old fashioned entity a chemists that is also a camera shop. Yes one still exists and has nice kit and a range of quality printer papers, books and other lovely stuff. I can get the X-T4 plus 70-300, 15-55, x1.4 and batteries, filters etc. Brill.
Listening to you I don't feel like such nugget for having splashed so much cash.
I've just bought a Mountain Warehouse Pace 30 for a walking holiday. Camera gear will go in padded containers alongside my sandwiches and flask.
Filters. I just followed the crowd and the only time I've been glad I had one on was when my brand new X-T4 took a dive into gorse, mud and gravel on Dartmoor in a rain storm. Otherwise a waste of space. Looks like eBay beckons.
Really like the down to earth opinions. Too many people out there trying to flog stuff and it's great to have. realistic and perhaps slightly cynical view.
Thanks for the video, I really enjoy this mix of a walkaround combined with the content..
Regarding the gorilla pod. I actually agree and don't agree at the same time. It's definitely a nightmare to use it for the camera, especially if your (like mine) is worn out and doesn't hold as it did years ago. But I have a gorilla pod with ball head in my bag every time I go to shoot. I use it to mount smaller lights on a tree branch out of sight, railing or anywhere I might need. Basically, as a lightstand it works amazing
Just brought the Bellroy Classic 16L backpack that you recommended perfect comfortable every day camera bag, well made.
8:26
Nice that you got the airplane in the left upper corner 🤩
I don't own a gorilla pod but I had one in my hands before and I completely agree with you. It only really makes sense for small and light cameras. Something with a similar footprint but made with solid legs makes much more sense since it can carry more weight and be more sturdy while taking up a similar amount of space in your bag.
Bags. I use Camelbak Quantico backpack with padded insert for camera and lenses. I can easily take out the insert and I can pack everything for bushcraft hike or something else. Now I want to make my own custom leather messenger bag (one or two) so that I can fit couple of cameras (analogue and/or digital) and couple of lenses + laptop and some everyday day carry items. I have made a drawing, now I need to print it out in 1:1 ratio and check if everything fits. Than I can put it on the leather, make some stitching holes and start stitching all together. First pancake of course will be burned and ugly, but the second to third one must be perfect.
Pro mist filters - I have one thanks to my friend. I know it's not polite to say about gifts but... I hate it. It never gives me any good result and I don't understand why it is needed.
Protective filters - I have several but I'm not using super expensive lenses, my lenses all are used and the most expensive cost me 350€ and cheapest cost me 15€ incl. the camera. I have filters on couple of lenses and they are warming filters mostly as I'm shooting film 70% and digital only 30%.
Filters are an old paradigm. With the exception of a circular polarizing filter, you can replace all with post processing and a bit of planning during the shoot e.g. bracketing exposures.
Some, yes, but ND filters? Color filters for b&w photography?
Generally agree with you but a good UV filter is essential in my eyes for protection. Much easier to clean than the front of a lens. I'd rather break a 50 dollar filter than the front of a 1000 dollar lens.
I'd also add whatever camera you're using to this list :') the autofocus pulsing was pretty annoying.
That's basically what he said. A good UV is worth it, not a cheap one.
So many people breaking some flimsy UV filter and being "glad it wasn't the lens" when the same impact wouldn't have left the tiniest mark on the actual lens.
If you like being careless, you're very clumsy or want to keep your gear pristine for selling it later (and buy a filter with good glass) it might be worth it. Not for me though.
On the subject of being obvious.
Fjallraven make a photo insert for their Kanken bags.
Everyone has a Kanken, they’re all over cities, you blend in perfectly
More photo sense spoken than in most YT videos (and hopefully money saved)! Well done. Love the images of the Shard where I used to work a third of the way up.
Nice practical video. Agree with all the points. I have been contemplating the f-stop cubes. Could you do a quick review of them please? Thank you.
About the bag problem: that's why I bought a Tenba camera bag. It *does not* look like a camera back on the outside - exactly what I was looking for. They are also not that overpriced.
Basically agrees with everything you've said, even if I'm still new to photography (less than a year).
- 150€ Camera bags that are designed in a way that if you lift them without zipping properly, everything hits the ground.
- UV filters that I thought were expensive at 50€.. they reduces too much sharpness so I had to take them off everytime I use the lenses and almost scratch my lense in the process..
- Negative clarity almost never looks good.. and there is a filter for that..
- The gorilla pod.. have one, everytime I've hanged it to a tree, I wished I could move the tree to get the right composition.. For half the price, I could get at least twice as useful
And basically, pretty much all these experiences I had, it's because I listened too other youtubers.. and salespersons..
I'm so easily influenced, I wish you realised that video a year ago ^^
Nice one Roman - great location walk through - great tips and I agree with all your comments about gear even though i'm a bit of a camera bag addict lol
Enjoyed your video. Thank you. I generally don't use filters. One point ; you didn't mention lens hoods. One item I always use
Agree with the uv filter, don't use those no longer for many years now. However when using a very expensive magnetic adapter on my 9 mm wide angle, my tripod fell. Ofcourse with lens and adapter/filter on the rocks. I can tell you rocks are way harder....had to use pliers too to unscrew the adapter and the thread of the lens was scratched but still useful afterwards.( luckily). It taught me to be extra careful when using a tripod. The Risk for going through that with a UV......no way, I leave it in the shop.
I have a UV filter on all my lenses and have never seen adverse affects in the images (although I do invest in good ones). I’m not so concerned about banging the front element of a lens as I am about other factors. It is much easier to clean the filter than the lens, and damage to the front element of the lens from cleaning is not uncommon. The UV filter provides superior water protection. (The lenses I’ve owned have all specified that their dust and water protection are only applicable if a filter is used on the front of the lens.) Canon has recommended using UV filters for water protection , and my most recent Sigma lens included a Sigma UV filter as lens protector. Only once have I had a stuck UV filter on a lens, and that came off pretty easily with a properly sized (and cheap) plastic filter wrench. When I purchase a lens I just factor in the cost of a filter from a reputable manufacturer.
I have a shit load of Camera Bags, 34! I only regularly use 4 of them. The one I use by far the most isn't one of the pricey big name models, it is an Endurex extra large backpack ($109). It is the bag of choice every time I fly. It is about the right combination of capacity, compartments, lightweight, and can just barely fit under an airline seat. I have added extra shoulderstrap pads because the ones it has were never meant for the load I put in the bag and due to the bag's advanced age (going on 6 years) they are not as effective as they once were. Otherwise the bag is in great shape still.
I bought a cheap Amazon Basics bag about a decade ago, and was amazed by the quality. I'm still using it today and have 2 Canon 6D bodies and L lenses in it. It's a very good bag with lots of pockets and straps for tripod etc. I wouldn't walk around with it at an event though, as it says "Amazon Basics" on the zippers, lol. It stays at home.
Thanks for naming Gorilla Pods for what they really are: crap.
I'm with you in the UV filter section. These shards had a meaning, sure. In the Alps. On a sunny day. While shooting film to avoid snow looking like the snow outside a pub. Since then, they're shards with a screw.
Bags - well, depends. I got some which are heavy and shout out "mugg her" when I wear them. But from a certain amount of gear needed, there's no way to avoid them. And yes, they are mainly overpriced. Well, at least as long as you are not into Louis Vuitton and Chanel. Their price tags for their bags set you somewhat back into an understanding of what REAL rip-off is. My perfectly fine peak design tote at least is cheap - for a well-made tote - and is a great camera bag.
The filter thingie. As I started off using Photoshop on a professional level with the sacred one-floppy-version 1.01 maybe around your 2nd birthday... well, that makes me a) ancient and b) quite profound in using it. And I strongly disagree with the whole using PSD to recreate filter effects. Why? Well, it simply doesn't work. As you said, 80 percent or so. Yeah, but the other 20 make the difference. Even worse: Photoshop was never really intended for that. The magic of Photoshop, the real reason why I still believe that it is divine code that was stolen in heaven by archangel Kai Krause, had and has its inherent beauty in creating from zero - or modifying images into abstraction. I'll never forget the days (and nights) spent in front of Quadra 950ies and the first Power Macs, waiting for Kais Power Tools to finish their work. Believe me, rave was not invented on turntables and mixers, it was invented by flyer gurus and fanzine designers...
Definitely with you about pro-mist filter effects and Photoshop, though to me it's more than just the technical question of whether PS can actually recreate the effect of using the real filter on your lens. It probably can't completely replicate it for now, but even if there was a built-in button that could do it perfectly, I really think there's something to be said for taking creative risks in the moment and capturing things in camera rather than second-guessing it all by poring over it for hours in the edit. We're always safer in our creative decisions in the edit than we are in the moment, and while I think that's great if you're a pro shooting an event for a client, it's pretty terrible if you're an artist trying to create something of genuine artistic value.
First time watching one of your videos, so excuse me if I misspeak. If I'm not mistaken this seems to be a primarily photo focused channel. On the topic of filters, especially the pro mist filters, I definitely agree that the effect can be added in post for photography. For film/video, this is much harder to do and hence what they're primarily intended for. I think this also how they ended up becoming popular in modern photography since there are so many hybrid shooters. For video, they're a great tool, but I agree if your focus is just stills, save your money and learn to edit in the effect.
I send that PRO MIST FILTER right back to where it came from, thanks Roman!
Beautiful scenery. I agree completely, especially about the bags and the useless gorilla pod. Mine went into the trash years ago. You can also easily overspend on tripods - either too expensives ones, or just too many. The catch-22 is lenses. Do I really need to keep all those lenses my father used? I always say yes... but it really is too much.
I avoided the pro mist filters, but the rest ... totally agree. Ironically, a couple of months ago, I switched from a Lowepro bag to a generic bag with an F-Stop insert.
100% agree with Gorilla Pods. Too much wobble even with a 2 sec delay, moves on smooth railings, takes ages to set up, falls over if you have a medium/large lense and looks like a beads.
I like my newest camera bag, because it is a backpack. Looks stealth, doesn't break my back and I have everything I need for a shoot.
Camera bags? I‘m a bag nerd!😂 I have 4 bags. One dedicated camera bag Wandrd Prvke 21L but I take it to the office everyday (with a camera inside. Next I have PD Everyday Sling 6L for when I only want to take one camera&one lens. Then I have a regular backpack (Dsptch Daybag) that was my main bag for many years but is now only used when I need a bag with space and not necessarily a camera. Last, I have a messenger bag that can be fastened on the back like the Everyday Sling. That was also my main bag for some years. It has lots of space and a big laptop compartment.
I agree with you about UV-filters. The only camera/lens that has a uv filter on is my X100S because it came with one when I bought it second-hand.
Gorillapods are pretty useless, as you have said. They were the rage back then because all these influencers (PMK!) used them and promoted them, but they are overprices and build like crap.
I'm curious to know: How do you store your Tripod when traveling if you use a regular Backpack?
The manfrotto elements folds tiny so no issue to put it in my 16l day bag. I also have a smaller set up of a mini gimbal tripod and an extension pole…. i need to do an updated camera bag video later this year :)
Always very interesting, truthful & informative, thanks so much..
On the subject of cheap light bags .... Tenba Packlite Travel bag ( fits a Tenba BYOB 9) £16.99 and Duragadget five pocket insert £13.99 .... both from ebay.
The Duragadget insert also goes into a plain canvas bag that I bought from Asda for £9.99 two years ago.
I absolutely agree with your points on camera bags, they just make you stand out in a bad way.
Totally agree. Even a small scratch on a lens is too close to affect the image as its way out of focus.finher prints, dust rain marks etc have way less affect than a flare from a uv filter. Gorilla pods are a waste of time as they are impossible to hold. Camera straps are another thing I leave in the box as a small bag works better for me. For bags it's best to carry a sling diaper bag, just remember to take the used ones out. Many a mom can tell you how much crap literally you can fit in it, and no right minded thief will rummage in there. The bottle is usable for water and the pampers add padding. Seriously a simple nylon sling is more than adequate and super light