Is 3D printing a revolution or just a trend?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- Additive manufacturing and 3D printing can reshape our future. Companies are now using these technologies to print everything from fully functional cars to Michelin-stared dinners.
Watch this video to learn more about how 3d printing and additive manufacturing might change the future!
To get the latest science and technology news, subscribe to our newsletter “The Blueprint” at bit.ly/3BDdN5e
Learn more: bit.ly/32npX46
#engineering #3Dprinting #additivemanufacturing
![Tee Grizzley - Robbery 8 [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/34_vkNV6wrU/mqdefault.jpg)
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
3d printing major drawback is that it takes time but each year it's getting faster so in a decade or two it will print in minutes and things could be mass produced quickly
It's been around 7 years people ask if it's "just a trend". I think this answers the question.
If it keeps developing and if smartly incorporated in several areas of research and production, i honestly believe 3D-Printing has the potential to "kickstart" a much more sustainable and advanced new Industrial Revolution... And the prospect of Advanced AI developing new 3D-Printing machines, down to new practical materials, is just way too good of an opportunity to be passed imo!
3D printing is the perfect tool if you need single quantities. Once you need a few hundred parts, injection molding and other traditional ways of manufacturing work better. It won't revolutionize mass production, but it will (and already does) revolutionize development, design and replacement parts.
Absolutely right. I own Nano Dimension stocks. What you said is exact my concern. I don’t know if there will be any way to increase productivity of 3D printers in the future. What do you think? Thanks.
@@xl3287 No, not really. It's not meant for that. The ONLY advantage 3D printing has over traditional production processes is that you don't need to reconfigure the machine if you want it to build something else. 3D printers are slow and will always be much slower. Because they are not meant for fast.
For example, say you want to build warhammer miniatures. A 3D printer will take at least half an hour for one figure. An injection molding machine would take a few seconds for that, and it would not build one at a time but maybe 100.
@@dak1st thank you Dakkaron
@@xl3287 That said, slow production speed does not need to impact the stock performance. 3D printing aims to augment/replace manual production. Say you want to prototype parts of a car. Before 3D printing you would send your CAD file to some manual manufacturer, where building the prototype would cost a few €100 and a few days.
With a 3D printer you send the CAD file to the in-house printer, it takes a few hours and maybe €10 in material.
It is a true revolution for prototyping, increasing the development speed by a lot.
3D printing was never meant to replace mass production. Whoever thought that had nothing to do with 3D printing.
@@dak1st make sense. Thank you so much for your explanation. I appreciate that!!
Thank for such a video explaining about this career option. I am currently trying to figure out what can I approach as a career option and listing them and cancelling them out after getting an overlook of the aspects of that career and the fact if I really have interest in it and can do it. So thanks, I really appreciate it.
If you want a good career option, become an expert in modelling 3d models and expert in CAD softwares, high demand skills in the printing business.
This was very useful for an essay I'm writing so many thanks.
it's the best thing for consumers that like to tinker and create stuff, especially those who don't have a shop or don't have space for power tools or large panels of wood to create stuff out of
it's also easy and can do a vast amount of figures
Fun fact: a patent for 3D printing appeared in the 1960s. The only reason it is seemingly just appearing recently is because big companies have had their patents expire.
The smallest printers can print solar panels, were waiting for an upgrade to the tech to make it viable, it has huge potential
That horible first layer at 1:38 got me twitching not gonna lie😂
Yeah 3D Printing sounds "fancier" but actually the right term here is Additive Manufacturing
Oh right. Because the video doesn't mention that like 4 times.
Definitely a revolution. But it’s still expensive for the most part and it’s not very vast. But in previous prototyping as well as really peculiar geometry it’s not just cost effective, it’s the only way to do it.
A latest technology, 3d printing can revolutionize the way printing happens.
This would be expensive but I think every school should have 3d printers and classes available to there students and that libraries 3d printing should be free with a limit (to prevent people from just selling free library prints) and eventually everyone having a 3d printer
Yeah it would be cool for schools to have them (my school did have a very fancy laser cutter that nobody could ever get working right but no printer). Honestly though a functioning “shop” class as Americans call it, “design technology” or “engineering” where I’m from, would be better.
Schools frankly don’t teach kids any practical skills, even physical education is mostly about sportsball not functional excersises kids can do their whole lives to maintain posture, flexibility, get muscular etc, it’s all too academic and engenders in people the idea that basically you need to go to university and latch onto a big company or the government or something. People don’t know how to have any ability to actualise in the real world, aside from throwing their money at stuff and having someone or something arrive to do it for them.
I know for many schools in the west engineering is one of the most underlooked, least well funded subject in schools. My school had this silly laser cutter but a knackered old pillar drill and no drill bits, no NEW sandpaper, few files that worked, no welding equipment, they didn’t really help kids work out HOW to go about making even the most simple thing they might need, yet making is arguably by far humanity’s most important skill, especially for the individual.
Printers would be a step in the right direction I guess but still to inaccessible and impractical and expensive for the students to apply it in their own lives after school, and less useful in a career than actual machine tool education would be. I mean how can kids make or design anything good in the future if they have 0 practical knowledge and have never thought in mechanical terms? My classmates are still mostly engineering-illiterate even in terms of basic DIY, they couldn’t even make a plywood box or anything.
it cant be a simple trend if i took a 3d printing class in highschool 8 years ago and were still talking about it today. Printers have come a long way since then and theyve become much cheaper an more available but one thing has remained the same: theyre still as slow as ever (unless you want to spend a ridiculous amount on a really good one)
Resin is probably the 2nd most popular type of 3d printing behind FDM, especially for doing it at home, and you didn't even mention it here.
Is 3d printing a revolution?
Nope.
The "Revolution" is already underway: de-centralization of materials, storage and manufacturing.
Example from the real world: Tool Company hires a firm to design a part, parts are forged in a specialty shop, parts sent to be drilled, parts sent to get polished.
From the polishers, they get sent to a fulfillment center, boxed up and sent to customers.
Most of the time, these vendors are in the same city.
Having all these functions 'in house' just don't make money, and each vendor can focus on being experts in their field!
Need more production capacity?
Hire more vendors.
Excess capacity? Don't shut down a Division, just tell the vendors to slow down.
It takes only a few days to start cranking out new parts if you can skip building the factory...
It's not a trend , it's logical that humanity is adopting this technology, as it could revolutionize the industry in how we purchase and create consumables, and the best part is money would be a thing of the past ! As there would be know need for money
Awesome comprehension - nailed it
Need to work on cost of the product.
Then feature can accupai this technology
Thank you so much for your information
This like how computers were in 1990.
Notice how much of an impact 3D printing had on the global economy ONCE the patent expired. Current patent laws don't help the economy, they only stifle it. Patents should only last a few years max! Only to help the inventor get a head start but nothing more.
RIP future production workers
Our future robot overloards will use 3D printers to build more soilders for their army.
Hoping in the Philippines, We Will Use 3D Printing to 3D Print: Tesla Optimus Like Humanoid Robots that are Working in Construction, Factories, and Even Services, Prefab Parts that will be Used for Building the Philippines Megaprojects Like S-Bahn from Clark to Calamba and 3D Printer Girders and 3D Printer Form Traveller that 3D Prints the Girder Span by Span or Segmental Girder for Balanced Cantilever and It Also Includes Cable aside From Segmental Girder if Used in Building Bridges with Cable Like Bridge Linking Matnog to Allen, and San Ricardo to Surigao, and Also Another Use for 3D Printing in the Philippines is the Consumers that will 3D Print, and Children that will 3D Print Toys Used for their Children without Going to Toy Stores.
Yes definitely 3 d printing is revolutionary and we would definitely see major advancements in them.. From printing house holds goods to fully functioning bio printed human organs.. In my opinion 3 d printing is one of the major advancement that we had been doing in our recent times.. And we need 3 d printing 😊🤘
This could disrupt the fracking industry, ✍🏽
How? Can it also kill vampires and stop diabetes? Almost all hobbyist printing is plastic, and all printers use lots of energy, I’m not saying it can’t be useful or fun but it’s not exactly going to save the planet or disrupt capitalism or whatever it is people want from it.
The metal strength is not as strong, the crystalline structure is random in orientation much like casting versus hot or cold rolled.
that is too general. in experiments SLS/SLM of certain steel powders showed nanocrystalline, martensitic structure with mechanical properties much higher than the same alloy with standard methods (continuous casting...)
Regular castings are also (in general) not random but show segregation and dendritic structure along with porosity...
random orientation would be prefered in most cases to archieve anisotropic mechanical properties. exceptions are sheet matal or wires where a texture is deliberately induced by rolling or wire drawing.
The biggest Problems with AM is not strength, but cost (expensive powders), shrinkage and part size. (currently limited to a few hundred kg as opposed to casting.)
OH THANKS SO MUCH FOR THIS VIDEO
3:12 what is that type of printing called??? I've never seen anything like that before!
To me seems to be a variant of Directed Energy Deposition
3d printing is going to become huge!
As a note, I've seen 3d printed shoes and a 3d printed dress. That future is getting closer by the day.
Hanzhen harmonic drive gear ,
strain wave reducer,
robot joint , over 30 years experience
where can i learn this in india???
There is no such heavy demand of 3d printed equipment in reality on ground? As such
@1:28 what kind of weird dental model is that?
Very informative
Hi from Will and Mr Data :) :]
This is the stone age of 3D printing.
Answer.
Value springs to mind.
Focus change.
Health.
Those are my initial thoughts.
Human printing was mentioned.
Someone "me"owns the licence to do that. Currently I'm asking 1% of any money made from doing that.
Be happy I could charge 100%
It and others had been for sale but it may be better I remain owner hence it's currently not for sale again.
Success sounds nice.
Bye for now and be well from Will and Mr Data :) :]
I'm machine guy.
But we will make the science and computations
Across the entire human sciences
Why is charlie baker making me watching this
What is the machine at 1:41??? Is that 3d printing nails??
4:47 That's not injection molding! C'mon bro!
Maaaan we're really on to somethin !
I have just invested in Desktop Metal. 3 D is definitely a revolution and here to stay. Great video !
How is your porfolio looking?
@@andreachaverra54 Shares down a little but to be expected. All tech shares down but waiting for rebound.
@@DisruptiveWealthCreation update us on how this aged. Are you still holding on to it?
how to learn
Nice 👍
Please tell me the title question is a joke
1comment ,1 view and 1 like👍
Good
What did you like the most?
@@f-22raptor18 Pizza Time
excellent
Hiiii
Super
This is an excellent video! Patents can be so toxic sometimes, basically squeezing blood from the wallets of consumers. 3D printing and its tech should be totally open source just as Elon Musk wants to do with Twitter coding!
It is a revolution
zendaya
Yes it is just a trendy thing to do. For manufacturing it is too slow, and metal 3D printing has a horrible surface finish. And fiber reinforces polymer 3D printing is not even close to to composites made the traditional way.
3D printing is not just a trend.
Other manufacturing will be better, yes.
But everyone having the ability manufacture everything at home is revolutionary. We all can bug advanced machining equipment. And because most people don’t need a lot of parts, it means everyone will have these things like we do microwaves.
If anyone cares to look it up, the 3D printed houses thing is totally bogus. None of the spiel or articles on it mention that it’s just the shell of the house, they still need finishing, roofing, electrics and plumbing, windows etc, plus they don’t take into account how long that stuff takes or transporting the printers... 48 hour printed houses and all that is total lies. Brick layers are probably more expedient tbf...
lol can all my first year NWU ALDE 111 students drop a like :)
All that remains is a reason to justify owning one.
I own a 3d printer for a few years now. Having one around is super useful, since it becomes another tool in your tool set at home. Once you become used to having one, you will find tons of applications. For example I bought roller blinds a few weeks ago. They were supposed to be glued to the frame using strong double-sided sticky tape, but they wouldn't stick. So I quickly printed an adapter that clips around the original mounting surface and increases the surface area where the tape is applied fivefold. And now with 5 times as much tape it's holding nicely.
Also, the cost of owning a 3d printer is incredibly low. Good models are available for around €200 now.
3d printing is not remedy for all problems, but it's the cheapest, cleanest and easiest CNC device you can own at the moment.
Your voice is not so clear
Ha bah yes hein
it feels like im being brain washed watching this
7th comment. Ah ha.
Honestly for 60% of projects you see on RUclips, they’d be better (and more quickly) made with metal, wood, plywood, bolts, a welder, solder, basic stuff like that. You need some tooling but to print you need a printer and filament - if you’re making really simple things a printer is a poor investment. I guess for prototyping it’s good if you already do all design and thinking in CAD terms anyway. Useless for mass manufacturing, basically useless for producing anything actually good/quality/high fit and finish or even functional unless you have a fancy printer, will take 4 or 5 hours plus modelling time and possibly finishing time, to make something you could make in 5 minutes with a piece of mild steel, a cheap holesaw, a file or grinder.
Saw someone make a little bearing holder thing, just a flat arm with 2 holes, radiused edges, why print that? I don’t understand at all, may as well start printing nuts and bolts or screws if you want to waste time.
Fact is except for very niche applications it’s a hobby.
I have seen it heralded as some climate saviour, as something cheap and easy, as something to put manufacturing into the hands of normal people (as opposed to... hand tools... okay.....) - it’s all nonsense. What’s worst about it is how many smart young men will waste their time on it, same goes for 3D models - outside of industry, generally a simple drawing is better, or a card prototype, or wood. Becomes more useful if you’re doing many prototypes or complex mechanisms obviously, I mean gears take so longer to make by hand if you want them accurate. Basically tech sucks and is misdirecting everyone. No I’m not a boomer.
Yip you read it.
No change yet.
How much has the comunity lost besides me. I may be down 2 billion or so. im Not impressed.
What?
it'd be cool to eventually be able to print your own mechanical parts what not. still got a ways to go :(