Jelly Cubes - Yummy!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
  • Yummy! The new Jelly Series by Mofangge. Tastes bad but can be used for puzzling at least. Enjoy!
    My Amazon.com shop:
    www.amazon.com...
    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    The puzzle shown in this video is available here:
    2x2: amzn.to/2NymZ67
    3x3: amzn.to/2NtCxrS
    3x3 Keychain: amzn.to/2N0NTUX
    4x4: amzn.to/2x4JzJw
    5x5: amzn.to/2oVS6dR
    Mastermorphix 3x3: amzn.to/2Nw618h
    Skewb: amzn.to/2QiH9Q4
    Square-1: amzn.to/2wWcH5s
    Pyraminx: amzn.to/2Qjgant
    More cool puzzle shops I do recommend:
    US:
    bit.ly/2GXglAA
    bit.ly/2J9eARK
    bit.ly/2IeqoRR (10% discount by using voucher "Mr Puzzle")
    Europe:
    bit.ly/2C1ZEoI
    bit.ly/2Ik1QGK
    bit.ly/2GpfN5w
    Asia:
    bit.ly/2pPHka0
    bit.ly/2Ig6lBP
    The links above are affiliate links. If you click the link and buy a product, I will receive a commission from the seller.
    Visit me on facebook for additional information:
    / mr.puzzleyoutube
    Support me and become one of my Patrons:
    / mrpuzzle
    Subscribe for further puzzle reviews, recommendations, and solutions.
    Music:
    Mandeville von Kevin MacLeod ist unter der Lizenz "Creative Commons Attribution" (creativecommon...) lizenziert.
    Quelle: incompetech.com...
    Interpret: incompetech.com/
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 182

  • @Mr.Puzzle
    @Mr.Puzzle  6 лет назад +92

    A bit chewy...

    • @ironoriginel9805
      @ironoriginel9805 6 лет назад +1

      gum

    • @benjaminbrewer2154
      @benjaminbrewer2154 6 лет назад +2

      Edible solids?

    • @pepperonipizza8200
      @pepperonipizza8200 6 лет назад +1

      Probably not what Marlin thought.

    • @leopardsxx
      @leopardsxx 6 лет назад +1

      I love seeing all the puzzles you show wether you show solution or not, its nice to see whats out there.. also i dont know if you play puzzle computer games, but maybe if you do, you could make a new channel say Mr.Puzzle Gamer or something and show the ones you have come across that you think are are interesting to play.. btw with the lock combination puzzle you showed once, the flaw in them is probably the same as combo locks in real life, all you have to do is apply tension to the lock bar to put pressure on the combinations, they are simple to find what combination it is from then.. but then that probably bypasses the whole point of the puzzle i guess lol

    • @nathanlanglois5773
      @nathanlanglois5773 6 лет назад +1

      you should start by solving the centers make sure you get the right color scheme then combine the edges and that will make it into a 3x3 then do your algs then the cube will be solved

  • @ernestc5641
    @ernestc5641 6 лет назад +186

    I came here to see you eat it. We came here to see you eat it. Eat it.

    • @Jay-qs2oi
      @Jay-qs2oi 6 лет назад +3

      Hahahaha

    • @Mr.Puzzle
      @Mr.Puzzle  6 лет назад +19

      Kind of chewy. Not recommended. :D

  • @kkyyee
    @kkyyee 6 лет назад +64

    I want to see your 3x3 cube solve method!

  • @CaraJoani
    @CaraJoani 5 лет назад

    Props to this company for sending Mr.Puzzle something he didn't have before. I imagine that's not easy.

  • @CyberMesh
    @CyberMesh 6 лет назад +14

    The most common technique for solving larger cubes is to "reduce" back to a 3x3- that is, solve the centers, then solve the edges, then solve the 3x3 that you're left with.

  • @toddreese2145
    @toddreese2145 6 лет назад +29

    I could solve a 1x1.

    • @Greennoob2
      @Greennoob2 6 лет назад +4

      Todd Reese nobody could. There’s nothing to solve about it

    • @POLARTTYRTM
      @POLARTTYRTM 6 лет назад +6

      wooosh

    • @Greennoob2
      @Greennoob2 6 лет назад +3

      POLARTTYRTM i don’t think it’s a whoosh. The joke is that anyone could solve a 1x1. But in fact, nobody could solve a 1x1

    • @rikishikato5001
      @rikishikato5001 6 лет назад +2

      BULLSHIT! NO MAN IN THIS WORLD HAVE THAT MUCH POWER AND KNOWLEDGE! EVEN LORD FELIKS ZEMDEGS, THE GOD HIMSELF, HAS NO SUCH POWER!

    • @eliskawiesnerva7353
      @eliskawiesnerva7353 6 лет назад +1

      @@Greennoob2 you should stop... You're just making yourself look dumb by explaining something that we all already know

  • @grivar
    @grivar 6 лет назад +47

    Very cool, however the thumbnail made me think they are edible. I am disappointed.

  • @skakdosmer
    @skakdosmer 6 лет назад +6

    When I got my first 3x3x3, I must admit I didn't have the patience to solve it on my own, so I bought a book. Many years later (after I had learned to master the the 3x3x3) I got my first 4x4x4, and this I solved on my own! I only ran into one problem:
    Here I should perhaps issue a spoiler alert, in case you don't want to have any prior knowledge before you try it yourself.
    When I first tried to solve the 4x4x4, I ended in a situation where everything was in order, except the two red/white edge pieces. (I later learned there's a 50% chance of this happening) I tried to flip them like you flip two edge pieces on the 3x3x3. And I found to my surprise that THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE! So the two edge pieces must have traded places - something that I knew to be impossible on a 3x3x3: On that one you can not have exactly two pieces trade places and nothing else happening. But I knew that nobody else had touched the cube, and that I had not disassembled it, so it had to be possible on the 4x4x4.
    Really there are two classes of edge pieces: Center edge pieces which can be flipped, and off-center edge pieces which cannot be flipped. On the 3x3x3 you have only center edge pieces, on the 4x4x4 you have only off-center edge pieces, but on the 5x5x5 you have both types. And edge pieces can only trade places with symmetrical edge pieces on any size cube.
    On the 5x5x5 you will also find that not all center pieces can trade places. The middle one can of course only be in the middle. But the remaining 8 fall into two types: The 4 that form a + with the middle and the 4 that form an x with the middle. And the two types can never trade places!
    On a 6x6x6 (and higher) you'll find that two pieces that have mirror symmetry cannot always trade places - they have to have turning symmetry. On all size cubes the number of center pieces - minus the middle one, if there is a middle one - will always be divisible into groups of 4 that have turning symmetry.
    From 7x7x7 and up there are no new difficulties - it just takes longer time.

  • @LadyTigerLily
    @LadyTigerLily 6 лет назад +1

    The sound of the Skewb clicking into place is so satisfying.

  • @maidggencyherr6338
    @maidggencyherr6338 6 лет назад

    The color is gorgeous!

  • @PetermusPrime
    @PetermusPrime 6 лет назад

    Love to see an old rubiks magic puzzle.

  • @SeafoodKilla1
    @SeafoodKilla1 6 лет назад +2

    Many Many different designs for these type of puzzles...not my fav type but you always make it very interesting...Very soothing listening o your voice..Thx Mr Puzzle...Keep on Puzzling!

  • @Mars20231
    @Mars20231 5 лет назад +1

    YES! Please do more cubing related videos on your channel.

  • @kenhaley4
    @kenhaley4 6 лет назад +1

    "Exactly similar" ...made me laugh.

  • @chrisb3976
    @chrisb3976 2 года назад

    The keychain gets good reviews. Nice little cube :)

  • @zeinette_
    @zeinette_ 2 года назад +1

    exactly ı want it loud asmr xd i like the sound actually

  • @Trexrush1
    @Trexrush1 6 лет назад +1

    Great Video! Here are some notes I took during the video:
    The Jelly 3x3 is actually the same design as another Qiyi 3x3 (The Qiyi Warrior W), not the Valk cubes. The Valk cubes have a better internal mechanism.
    The 4x4 and 5x5 are both solved by reducing the solve to a 3x3, known as the Reduction method. Its not too difficult to learn, however for 4x4 it requires learning 2 difficult parity algorithms, so I suggest starting with the 5x5 first.
    Skewbs are and official competition event!

  • @Blueberryyymuffin
    @Blueberryyymuffin 5 лет назад

    They are so cute! I want one!

  • @fidgetspinner1050
    @fidgetspinner1050 6 лет назад +4

    The 5x5x5 cube is actually easier than the 4x4x4.

    • @rotgutthebloated4730
      @rotgutthebloated4730 5 лет назад

      I cant solve edges on last layer that are between middle block and corner block

  • @dont1301
    @dont1301 6 лет назад

    I already ordered one of these

  • @boilermaker7754
    @boilermaker7754 6 лет назад

    I also would love to see your 3 by 3 method, I use, I think, the beginner algorithms...always interested to see the other methods.

  • @tatertatertatertatertater
    @tatertatertatertatertater 5 лет назад

    Ooohhh...squishy!

  • @erica5288
    @erica5288 6 лет назад +3

    Cool puzzles. Love to see you do them live.

    • @livewithcarla909
      @livewithcarla909 6 лет назад

      Erica Hanna could you please like my first solve on my channel

  • @cosmicjenny4508
    @cosmicjenny4508 6 лет назад +1

    For the 4x4, you should intuitively construct all six centres, and then pair all of the edges, so you can solve it like a big 3x3!
    Watch out for the two potential parities, though.

  • @MattDelgrosso
    @MattDelgrosso 6 лет назад +10

    Tutorial definitely

  • @EmperMiner1990
    @EmperMiner1990 6 лет назад

    you should approach the 4x4 by deducing the center and edges into a giant 3x3, look at a 3x3 centers for comparison

  • @jedigoof1548
    @jedigoof1548 6 лет назад +1

    The 3x3 pyramid is a speed cube contender. It can be solved in very few moves no matter how mixed it is.

  • @joeycubes68
    @joeycubes68 6 лет назад

    Those look awesome

  • @pepinio4320
    @pepinio4320 6 лет назад +1

    I like it sooooooo much that you also make twisty puzzles video's

  • @thewildanimal18
    @thewildanimal18 5 лет назад

    JUST EAT IT! PEOPLE WANT YOU TO!

  • @filipesantos2230
    @filipesantos2230 5 лет назад

    From a speedcuber I avoid the 4x4 for 2 years..

  • @gavinmcdiarmid4958
    @gavinmcdiarmid4958 6 лет назад

    the standard way of solving a 4x4 is known as the reduction method, which essentially consists of solving the 4 centers in the right place, and then pair the two edges together without breaking the centers by using a combination of outer and inner layer turns. then, you will be left with an unsolved 3x3, and can complete the cube as if it was a 3x3 using outer layer turns, however you may get an extra step know as parity, which can be tricky. have fun solving!

  • @kittyterula
    @kittyterula 6 лет назад

    These are all really nice looking puzzles, very interesting 😊 I would love to see a video dedicated to miniature puzzles, like things designed for keychains. I always loved those as a child.

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

    Show your method!!! That'd be so cool because it would be completely (sort of) new!

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

    The mastermorphix is just a shape modification of a 3x3

  • @RWHaulbrook
    @RWHaulbrook 6 лет назад

    I too am disappointed the puzzles aren’t candy

  • @BrenKass
    @BrenKass 6 лет назад +1

    A relatively easy way to solve any n x n x n cube is to reduce it to a 3x3x3 (excluding 2 parities): make all center pieces one colour, make all edges the correct colour, solve as 3x3x3

  • @Jay-qs2oi
    @Jay-qs2oi 6 лет назад +1

    Cat likes them = SOLD! Great video as always

  • @dumbbanana4334
    @dumbbanana4334 5 лет назад +1

    Lol i thought that u can actually eat them... 😅

  • @bioLarzen
    @bioLarzen 6 лет назад +1

    Nice video - as usual.
    One note though: if you're reviewing such colorful gadgets, you may want to place them so it's not their by far dullest (this greyish white) side that is visible 90% of the time - I would think placing them so their (more) colourful sides are facing the camera would be a more fortunate setup.
    But it's still a good one.

  • @Liero_
    @Liero_ 5 лет назад

    Skewb is a competition in wca comps

  • @fizixx
    @fizixx 6 лет назад

    No puzzle this week, but apparently I missed this one, so this is my My. Puzzle installment for the week.
    I love the material of these puzzles, and the colors. I'd kind of like to see you do the tutorial on the 3x3. Maybe that would get me interested in these kinds of twisty puzzles.

  • @CatSlinky
    @CatSlinky 6 лет назад

    Yes to 3x3x3.

  • @jesusalvaroaguileral607
    @jesusalvaroaguileral607 6 лет назад

    Yes, show us your way to solve the 3x3.
    You should start with the 5x5 because is a bit easier for the central piece, it tells you what color to put in each face, in the 4x4 you have to remember the color pattern and even doing it, that can lead it to a parity case.

    • @jesusalvaroaguileral607
      @jesusalvaroaguileral607 6 лет назад

      Once you are familiar with the 3x3 and can recognice all the pieces (6 centers, 12 edges and 8 corners) you can easily solve the shape shifter mastermorphix, yes it is a 3x3.
      After solving the 2x2 it is easy to solve the pyramorphix. The skewb is also easy, finally the last one to try should be the square-one.
      Would be great to see the way you solve them and the algorithyms you use or discover.

  • @1.4142
    @1.4142 6 лет назад

    This is exactly how it was for me when I got my first cubes as a gift, trying to solve them without looking at the solutions.

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 6 лет назад

    In my opnion the 4x4 is harder than a 5x5, this is because you can solve the inner 3x3 on a 5x5, pair edges (which istn actuslly to hard) & then just solve another 3x3 :)

  • @hxvoon5682
    @hxvoon5682 6 лет назад +1

    Love your puzzle videos

  • @gap6922
    @gap6922 5 лет назад

    He like valk i seeeeeeeeee

  • @EricMoteberg
    @EricMoteberg 6 лет назад

    4x4x4: Solve the centers, first. (First, two opposite sides, then the next two adjacent sides, then the remaining sides.) Then solve the edges, then solve as a standard 3x3x3, except for the occasional parity flip, which you MUST know the solution to in order to solve, because this involves 2 cubies on a single edge being flipped. (Similar to the parity flip on the 5x5x5.)

  • @Past_Worlds
    @Past_Worlds 6 лет назад

    With the 4x4, start with the centers, then you can solves the rest kind of like the a 3x3.

  • @EleanorPeterson
    @EleanorPeterson 6 лет назад +4

    Don't eat jelly cubes. They are all related to The Blob. If you eat a jelly cube The Blob will come and get you. Be afraid.

    • @Mr.Puzzle
      @Mr.Puzzle  6 лет назад

      😁

    • @forvergone4784
      @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

      Isn't the blob that 50s movie that's against communism or something?

  • @hyperkingx8491
    @hyperkingx8491 6 лет назад

    Collab with Chris Ramsay!

  • @Liero_
    @Liero_ 5 лет назад

    Square 1 is official name of this puzzle and its also a competition. Its very specific and extremely difficult to solve intuitivly

  • @RelivingHelena
    @RelivingHelena 6 лет назад

    I’ve struggles with other tutorials for the 3x3 I’d love to see your take! Need to get one of these adorable cubes!

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

    A 5x5 is just like a 3x3 but then you have to pair the edges, but then you can just solve it like a 3x3

  • @Cubing_Burger
    @Cubing_Burger 6 лет назад

    All the cubes you unboxed minus the pyramorphix and the megamorphix are cubes you can do in competition. An easy way to solve a 4x4 us to first solve the 4 middle pieces on every side, and then solving all of the edges and bring it down to just a 3x3, you might get parity and i wish you a lot of good luck if you wanna solve that without a tutorial

  • @DaleTrevors
    @DaleTrevors 6 лет назад

    Yes I would like to learn your technique on how to solve the Rubik's Cube, You can start a few-episode serie

  • @Thori45
    @Thori45 6 лет назад

    I'd like to see your 3x3x3 solution :)

  • @rikishikato5001
    @rikishikato5001 6 лет назад

    oh? you also have Valk3 Power!

  • @AugustoSapaico
    @AugustoSapaico 6 лет назад

    that was beatiful!

  • @Mlynoph
    @Mlynoph 6 лет назад +1

    This was really cool! And I would love a 3 by 3 tutorial from you. I also have my own way of solving it but I would love to see what you do to solve it.

  • @M.athematech
    @M.athematech 6 лет назад +1

    The standard solution of the 4x4x4 is to solve the 4 block centers first - here one must be careful to ensure that the centers are lying correctly relative to each other according to the color scheme of the cube. One can check this by looking at the colors of the corner pieces. Even if you have centers lying correctly relative to each other, because there is no actual visible fixed center block to guide you (as in the case of odd number cubes like 5x5x5 or 7x7x7), it is possible that you will end up with the centers lying incorrectly with respect to the rest of the pieces - something which you will not be able to see immediately but results in surprises towards the end of the solve. The next step in the standard method is to pair up matching edge pieces. After this is complete, the 4x4x4 will be the equivalent of a 3x3x3 with centers actually made up of 4 matching pieces and edges made up of 2 matching pieces. You can now attempt to solve it like a 3x3x3, but because of the centers might not have been positioned relative to the other pieces correctly as I mentioned, you can get cases that never occur on a real 3x3x3. Two special algorithms are needed that temporarily break the 2 piece edges and 4 piece centers in order to get out of these cases and back to only cases that occur on a real 3x3x3.
    Now if you think that is too complicated, you can try do the 4x4x4 purely intuitively without algorithms. One way is to do it intuitively layer by layer. With this approach it is fairly easy to get 3 layers solved, but to do the 4th layer will typically require writing down your moves in order to back track and restore things. Another intuitive approach is to build 2x2x2 blocks and then it becomes the equivalent of a 2x2x2 cube. But be warned neither of these intuitive approaches are trivial.

  • @Skorgrim
    @Skorgrim 6 лет назад

    As many others here, I would like to see you solving any of them.
    Really nice review though. I´m always happy if there´s a new video from you :D

  • @a.m.kabdullahalkhzalah3896
    @a.m.kabdullahalkhzalah3896 6 лет назад

    Yes please i want to see the 3×3 way

  • @alex-qk8ln
    @alex-qk8ln 6 лет назад

    Ich liebe Rubik's Cubes ich kann alle lösen

  • @KrisHall7997
    @KrisHall7997 6 лет назад

    Silly me I was expecting a candy puzzle that you were going to eat at the end..

  • @koorbit
    @koorbit 6 лет назад

    you should approach the 4x4 by macking it a 3x3 so matching up all the center-pieces and edge-pieces

  • @Liero_
    @Liero_ 5 лет назад

    When you are comparing 3x3's remember that Valk Power and Valk Power M are top tier cubes and cost a lot.
    I love your channel btw :D

  • @dachiiiii
    @dachiiiii 6 лет назад

    Duuudee u have valk! thats my dream cube

  • @Marco_Ak
    @Marco_Ak 6 лет назад

    "this one is much more silent". SKRRRR WRRR KWRRR

  • @FLP-MK
    @FLP-MK 6 лет назад

    Diese Teile hab ich nie hinbekommen...

  • @arunakumari9407
    @arunakumari9407 6 лет назад +2

    Please solve mastermorphix 3x3

  • @rikishikato5001
    @rikishikato5001 6 лет назад

    to solve cubes above 3x3x3, you solve the centers first. then solve the edges. you can solve it like normal 3x3x3 after that. but you should know the colour scheme if you solve the even layered cube like 4x4x4. I think your cubes use western colour scheme. the way I solve it is from the white center. and then move to the opposite colour--which is yellow. then continue with the third center. for example, red center. after that. solve another center beside the red center, it's either blue or green. but take a look at where your white center is. if your white center is on the bottom side and the red center is on the fron side, then the green side is on the right side, blue one is on the left, and orange is on the back. after that pair all the edges. white-red edge with another white-red edge, yellow-blue with another yellow-blue, and so on. after you finished all pairings, you can proceed to solve it like a normal 3x3x3. but in an even-layered cube like 4x4x4 and 6x6x6, there is something called "parity" which you have to fix to proceed into solving the rest. I suggest find the proper tutorials on RUclips to learn more. maybe learn from CubeSkills RUclips channel which is managed by the former 4x4x4 world record holder, Feliks Zemdegs. he can explain it better than I can
    P.S.
    Square-1 is called like that because the scrambled state is not in a cube shape. so you solve it back to a square shape. as people say, "Back to square one"

  • @Arthurpiano9
    @Arthurpiano9 6 лет назад

    for the 4x4 cubes, you need to first put together the two middle pieces on the edges. after that, I think you will get it.

  • @kobs_0
    @kobs_0 6 лет назад

    Shapeshifters are extremely difficult... I found the 4x4 easier to learn & even started the 5x5 before going back to some (now simple) shapeshifters...

  • @Greennoob2
    @Greennoob2 6 лет назад

    I recommend going straight to the 5x5. You only need to learn 1 more algorithm and the rest is all intuitive movements. Although, as a casual solver, my early times were around 20mins and my best time was around 10mins

  • @TS_Mind_Swept
    @TS_Mind_Swept 2 года назад

    I've never been able to unscramble these things... Not sure if you made that tutorial, but I'd watch it to see if I can pick anything up. Thb tho, I thought this was going to be an April fool's video where it looked like for real cubes, but it was actually something edible :p

  • @icould5056
    @icould5056 6 лет назад +5

    if you can solve a 4x4, you can solve a 5x5(the other way around is true as well). in my opinion 5x5 is easier because the there is an established pattern(you know where the white face is ...) as for the 4x4 - it doesn't have centers. About the Mastermorphix, start with an edge not a face, you will see why(its not that hard).

    • @KCML82
      @KCML82 6 лет назад +1

      That’s not entirely correct. If you know 3x3 and 4x4, you can solve all NxN cubes.
      But if you only know 5x5, you could run into parity problems on even layered NxN cubes.
      You’re right about the rest

    • @icould5056
      @icould5056 6 лет назад

      @@KCML82 yeah but its easy to fix (technically you can have parity on 5x5 too)

    • @SgtSupaman
      @SgtSupaman 6 лет назад

      KoBo_043 is right, there are parities on even cubes that you will never run into on an odd cube (like one edge being flipped).

  • @bluerizlagirl
    @bluerizlagirl 6 лет назад

    To solve the 4x4 cube, you need to start by pairing up all the middle pieces. Then it reduces to a 3x3 cube. Any more than that might be a spoiler .....

  • @SoemLp
    @SoemLp 6 лет назад

    I collect rubiks cubes und the 4x4 is exactly like the 5x5. In fact its a little bit harder because you get a parity on the 4x4.
    The best way is to reduce it to a 3x3.
    First do the centers, pair up the edges and finally solve it like a 3x3.

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

    Is this like a reupload? I remember watching these videos sooooo long ago! Not only 3 months!

  • @AbsoRuud76
    @AbsoRuud76 6 лет назад

    Most of those are used in speedsolving. Except the two mastermorphix. You would be surprised at how fast they can be solved. You say you have mastered the 3x3x3... what is your best time?

  • @Valspartame_Maelstrom
    @Valspartame_Maelstrom 6 лет назад

    I want to see your kitty! WHERE IS THE KITTY?!

  • @Kinnijup
    @Kinnijup 6 лет назад +1

    Straight up thought he was gonna taste one :(

  • @SgtSupaman
    @SgtSupaman 6 лет назад

    You tricked me. From the title, I thought this was a Tony Fisher video. He has made functional Rubik's Cubes out of ice, wax (making it into a candle), and chocolate, so I thought he made one out of jelly.
    Regarding the 4x4x4, other people have said it, but it bears repeating to ensure you see it, the easiest approach is basically to solve the middles first and match up all the edges so you can then solve it like a 3x3x3. The only bad thing is you may run into parity problems that can't happen on a 3x3x3, but I'm sure you can figure out how to get past them (if they even come up). Good luck.

  • @sleepingandeatingsyndrome1613
    @sleepingandeatingsyndrome1613 6 лет назад +1

    It seems that they can be found in China and I will search for them on TaoBao.😝😝😝😝😝

  • @dieterfelden8689
    @dieterfelden8689 6 лет назад +3

    Ha... jetzt wissen wir warum du umgezogen bist. Ein grösseres Männerpuzzlezimmer war nötig. Bei der Masse der Puzzle. Es macht immerwieder Spass dir zu zu schauen. Mach weiter so. 👌👍🤗

  • @levilewis4547
    @levilewis4547 4 года назад

    He says a slight difference between sticker less and stickered

  • @__teles__
    @__teles__ 5 лет назад

    I've had a thing called a rubik's cube for 40 years now and I can tell you they are impossible to solve.

  • @twiggypancake3902
    @twiggypancake3902 6 лет назад

    The 4x4 is easy once you know how to solve big cube
    any cube bigger in the numbers that 3x3 wich is the normal rubiks cube
    There is only two new things to learn
    1 centers: solve the centers so you can see solved center in evry side
    2edge pairing : it's a bit hard to explain what is it but once you watch tutorial it will be very easy to under stand
    If you learn this 2 things and be pro in it you can solve any cube bigger than 3x3
    After you do this two things it solves like 3x3 the normal cube

  • @GoofyTron
    @GoofyTron 2 года назад

    Are these cubes magnetic?

  • @xaviereastcott5367
    @xaviereastcott5367 6 лет назад

    Do puzzlers Samurai puzzle

  • @FryGuy1013
    @FryGuy1013 6 лет назад

    5x5 is easier than 4x4 to me. No parities to figure out.

  • @NathanChisholm041
    @NathanChisholm041 6 лет назад +2

    When will you do the Borg cube? Lol cheers

  • @forvergone4784
    @forvergone4784 5 лет назад

    Why do you have a valk? Also, what's your best time on 3x3

  • @lunablader8855
    @lunablader8855 5 лет назад

    Wait you do cubing videos

  • @rikishikato5001
    @rikishikato5001 6 лет назад

    wait a minute. I saw something inside the edge pieces of the 4x4x4 and 5x5x5. are those magnets? are they magnetized?

  • @brianha6176
    @brianha6176 6 лет назад

    He said qiyi

  • @gustavb479
    @gustavb479 6 лет назад

    Great channel!! Which is your favorite Hanayama puzzle and which is the most difficult in your oppinion?

  • @1.4142
    @1.4142 6 лет назад

    Clue: The mastermorphix is fundamentally the same as a 3x3 cube. The center, edges, and corners are still in the same place relative to each other, it's just the shape on the outside that is different, so the orientation of the center matters. Look a it as three layers, with an edge being the first layer a band going around the middle as the second, and the opposite edge as the third. Solve the cube one layer at a time, starting with an edge and going up. Also remember the orientate the centers correctly. Hope I didn't spoil too much!