4 Motor TVC Model Rocket - Static Fire #2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
  • Sorry for that bad quality! Over time time we will increase the quality more and more!
    In the next videos will be commentary with a microphone + data from the flights. We also try to get much more angles + 4K and SlowMo Videos.
    On the day of Static Fire 2 it was 36 Degrees Celsius hot and we just wanted to finish that test as fast as possible.
    Because of the risk of a fire we also had two fire extinguisher.
    Take a look at our Instagram and Website for more information!
    Instagram: / ltmodelrockets
    Website: ltmodelrockets...

Комментарии • 45

  • @LTModelRockets
    @LTModelRockets  3 года назад +2

    Here is a video of our first flight with the rocket:
    ruclips.net/video/YW12mBpqLv0/видео.html
    And the second flight:
    ruclips.net/video/1se5MjMKQ1I/видео.html

  • @snowvalleyrat
    @snowvalleyrat 3 года назад +30

    I started cracking up when it escaped the hold down gimbal. Your first flight video was rad by the way! Major progress!

    • @LTModelRockets
      @LTModelRockets  3 года назад +3

      Hahaha thank you 😁 We also cracked up because I said "There is nothing that could go wrong" shortly before the ignition. Well...

  • @dumontspace8346
    @dumontspace8346 4 года назад +8

    Great. This test with a gopro inside will be awesome.

  • @malloguy
    @malloguy 4 года назад +11

    Very Nice

  • @leona4853
    @leona4853 4 года назад +2

    Thx for the Video. Freue mich schon auf Videos mit Details😀

  • @machinze_edits
    @machinze_edits 3 года назад +2

    Waiting for the next testing Houston !👍🏻

  • @Harry_Ballzonya
    @Harry_Ballzonya 2 года назад

    That was still awesome!

  • @forcemultiflier1746
    @forcemultiflier1746 3 года назад

    Holy crap Batman! do not invite me me to your next one !!!

  • @TE-re2bs
    @TE-re2bs 4 года назад +4

    Nice

  • @LERS_ZENIT
    @LERS_ZENIT 3 года назад

    Great start! Successful launches !!!

  • @Sachin-nu7bj
    @Sachin-nu7bj 3 года назад

    Ready to fly

  • @titusrider7948
    @titusrider7948 3 месяца назад

    Aye captain, we're giving her way too much power, suggest we reduce to warp factor "eleven" 😅😅😅

  • @cannaer8164
    @cannaer8164 3 года назад +1

    Might want to hold it down a bit better next time

  • @jmspaceR
    @jmspaceR 4 года назад

    Looks great! It tryed to currect other than mine today!

  • @d0tted770
    @d0tted770 2 года назад

    That s a succes!

  • @VIJAYzk
    @VIJAYzk 3 года назад +6

    come on guys you can do this. because
    failing is
    First
    Attempt
    In
    Learning.

  • @lidiacaballero399
    @lidiacaballero399 3 года назад

    Perfecto propulsión muy fuerte

  • @chaoticlabzdev
    @chaoticlabzdev Год назад

    @LTModelRockets why not any more projects?

  • @mrockets478
    @mrockets478 4 года назад +2

    Sieht gut aus, freue mich bald mehr davon zu sehen. Ihr habt ja bereits die Fehlerquelle gefunden. Was mich interessiert, was für eine Zykluszeit habt ihr bei eurer Messung / Regelung? Über wie viele samples habt ihr den gleitenden Mittelwert gemacht?

    • @LTModelRockets
      @LTModelRockets  4 года назад +1

      Gemessen wurde alle 10ms, also 100 Messungen die Sekunde und ein gleitender durchschnitt von den 10 letzten werten. In der Zukunft werden wir nie wieder einen Moving Average benutzen. Aktuell schreiben wir den code neu auf einer komplett neuen Basis, dort wird alles etwas einfacher werden :).

  • @andreagamba9207
    @andreagamba9207 2 года назад +1

    Propellant?

  • @lobot0905
    @lobot0905 3 года назад

    Geil man feier ich grade voll viel Glück noch

  • @kayboku7281
    @kayboku7281 4 года назад

    I give that 10 out of 10 for an attempt! Im building the same thing too, so im sure i will have similar attempts!

    • @LTModelRockets
      @LTModelRockets  4 года назад +1

      I can tell you one thing: Use every safety precaution you can make. Without the wire that rocket could have hit one of us. We learned from that and will make it better next time :D

  • @kayboku7281
    @kayboku7281 4 года назад +2

    BAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAH thats awesome!!!! :)

  • @pavel1809
    @pavel1809 2 года назад

    launches pad need to be strong lol

  • @The_Machinist
    @The_Machinist 6 месяцев назад

    Failure is just a delayed success my friends

  • @mekatronikmuhendisi8420
    @mekatronikmuhendisi8420 2 года назад

    why are your rocket engine fire a for long time from another rocket engine ?

  • @Matt-pg5sd
    @Matt-pg5sd 3 года назад +1

    I thought it was a static test

    • @LTModelRockets
      @LTModelRockets  3 года назад

      Haha well the rocket decided that it wanted to be free!

  • @user-ki2rt4wt8o
    @user-ki2rt4wt8o 3 года назад

    Epic

  • @HSpaceSystems
    @HSpaceSystems 3 года назад

    oh no

  • @terrywheelock9458
    @terrywheelock9458 3 года назад

    LAND SHARK! ..... RUN AWAY! 🤣

  • @diegocordero676
    @diegocordero676 3 года назад

    What do you use to hold the rocket down during static fire?

  • @juanvelez3889
    @juanvelez3889 3 года назад

    Looked pretty static to me.

  • @bremms1
    @bremms1 7 месяцев назад

    Well now.. could have gone better.

  • @j_owatson
    @j_owatson 3 года назад +1

    Didn't look very static lol

  • @DataLog
    @DataLog 2 года назад

    I don't understand why is everyone building these "rockets" where the rocket is maybe 5% of the entire setup, and 95% is actually a mode of a rocket.
    If you're building a rocket, 90% of that rocket should be fuel. Everything else is just meaningless.

    • @LTModelRockets
      @LTModelRockets  2 года назад

      Well, if we want to put 90% fuel in our rocket, it will require multiple kg's of fuel. But thats just not possible under german law. Additionaly most manufacturers make just small rocket motors, so there is no way to buy them.
      But besides that, its not our intention to make an efficient rocket because its simply not needed. We dont intend to go to orbit or high altitudes - we intend fly no more that a few hundred meters to test our stabilisation systems and many other sensors - to collect data and understand how some things behave under those circumstances.
      So explain to me, why do you think we would need 90% fuel in that rocket? What advantages would that have?
      If you compare all advantages with disadvantages, you should see that - in our case - it simply makes no sense to have that much fuel in the rocket.

  • @user-ox9bd8vb3n
    @user-ox9bd8vb3n 8 месяцев назад

    😅