Best EMF meters Part 10/13 (Magnetic 3) -- High Voltage Power lines --

This is a bonus video, the previous 2 videos about magnetic fields have real audio and should already tell a lot, but I had made this footage so why not share it.
It's very possible that magnetic fields from power lines in your area are stronger (or weaker) than seen in this video, it's always best to measure to be sure.
New people often overestimate the EMF dangers from power lines and underestimate the EMF dangers coming right into their home through the wires and from the devices they are using. Touching the surface of a laptop can expose you to much higher levels of EMF than being under high voltage power lines, but most people are usually scared from power lines and not from a laptop. Not saying that living right under, or too close to high voltage power lines is safer, since that exposure is uninterrupted.
My technique of moving the EMF meters may look strange, but it was important to move them like seen. If you don't understand why, watch the first minute of this video:
• Best EMF meters Part 8...
Timestamps:
0:23 K-II ("fake") -- K-II ("genuine")
1:26 K-II ("fake") -- GQ-EMF-390-V2
2:21 K-II ("genuine") -- EMFields PF5 Pocket
3:34 K-II ("fake") -- Gigahertz ME3851A
4:32 K-II ("genuine") -- Gigahertz ME3851A
5:56 K-II ("fake") Meterk MK08
6:52 Meterk MK08 -- Gigahertz ME3851A
7:55 Meterk MK08 -- Fuyi Fy876
8:39 Telephone pickup coil + amp
9:41 Erickhill RT-100 -- GQ-EMF-390-V2
11:31 Erickhill RT-100 -- EMFields PF5 Pocket
14:01 Erickhill RT-100 -- Gigahertz ME3851A
15:33 Cemprotec 34 -- Trifield TF2 (standard mode)
18:51 Gigahertz ME3851A -- Cornet ED88T
19:49 GQ-EMF-390-V2 -- Gigahertz ME3851A
21:37 GQ-EMF-390-V2 -- Trifield TF2 (standard mode)
24:44 GQ-EMF-390-V2 -- Cornet ED88T
26:18 Trifield TF2 (standard mode) -- Cornet ED88T
26:56 Gigahertz ME3830B -- Trifield TF2 (standard mode)
29:00 GQ-EMF-390-V2 -- EMFields PF5 Pocket
31:57 Gigahertz ME3851A -- EMFields PF5 Pocket
34:49 Gigahertz ME3851A -- Gigahertz ME3830B
38:25 Results
I also tried with a BR-9A, but being able to see it's display outdoors was worse than the Erickhill, it was near impossible to see something on camera, so this is the reason why I didn't include any footage of that device. Not that it matters much, it wasn't performing good anyway.
If you want to buy an EMF meter, I highly recommend to watch ALL the videos in this series before making a final conclusion and decision.
freesound.org/...
************************************************************************
Based on all the different tests in this video series, my 2022 recommendation and choice of device for AC magnetic fields:
-- 1st choice -- (best devices for magnetic fields in my opinion for EHS)
Gigahertz ME3951A
Gigahertz ME3851A
gigahertz-solu...
-- 2th choice -- (approved budget meters for magnetic fields)
Gigahertz ME3840B
Gigahertz ME3830B
Cornet ED88TPlus5G
Trifield TF2
EMFields PF5 pocket
*******************************************************************
-- Untested --
Alphalab UHS2
NFA1000
These two are triple axis meters and probably very good, but also very expensive.
The UHS2 only measures AC magnetic fields, nothing else (so no electric fields either).
I don't get anything from any company if you buy one of these devices,
so my choice is not influenced by anybody other than myself.

[@Merializer]

The devices that were the most sensitive to these power lines were:
1st place:
Gigahertz ME3851A
Gigahertz ME3830B
2th place:
EMFields PF5 Pocket
3th place:
To me it looked like the Cornet ED88T in LF30 mode was more sensitive and more reliable to read than the rest,
that doesn't say anything about it's accuracy, but it won in sensitivity over the others for me.
The Trifield TF2 was sensitive to wind and shocks, the peak may just have been triggered by that
at certain distances making you think it measured something,
I think it performed worse than the Cornet sensitivity wise (accuracy is something else, but a meter has to be useful as well).
The test wasn't ideal to determine the best of the other devices in order, I would have needed to place extra distances in between for that, but the work has to end at some point and the first 2 videos about magnetic fields already told a lot. The more different tests the more clear things become though.
I didn't include much footage from the Cornet ED88T and not always triple axis because it's difficult to film it's screen, it's small and reflections are often a problem to make good recordings, I was getting tired of it at the time.
The EMFields PF5 didn't seem sensitive to wind I think, but it is sensitive to jerky movements and tiny shocks,
this may be annoying to some people and it may be difficult to do measurements in a moving car for example.
I haven't checked every device I tested for this, but the Gigahertz ME3851A doesn't do such things easily.
If you want to see my final choice and recommendation for 2022 of best device for magnetic fields, read the description (click on: Show more).

[@serggamer5166]

Very helpful video. Thank you. I use to measure the magnetic field of 50 Hz Tenmars tm-190 multi-field emf meter. I would like to know your opinion about it

[@serggamer5166]

@@Merializer Thank you! I plan to buy gigahertz to measure dirty electricity

[@neotv4K]

K-ll where ordered it from see one from ghost hunt store ?

[@Merializer]

Yes it originates from a ghost hunting store, to make sure it was so called "genuine".