Arnold's Lats disappears when doing an Ab and thigh comparison with Mentzer. He was U-shaped instead of sought after V-taper. Arnold's waist and hips were wide, making him look inferior. Even Arnold's standout side chest was elapsed by Mike. Mike's execution was better. Better delts, triceps forearms, and bringing the chest out more. Mike's abs and serratus were superior as well
Arnold projected he was winner and pulled it off. Mentzer was thin in the chest when he spread wide his arms. And his short arms made him appear thick. But he was closer to fourth to me over Boyer Coe.
Frank Zane a pesar de estar pequeño era el olympia. Arnold se imponía a Mike Mentzer en el segundo puesto por carisma y gran experiencia para posar, a pesar de no estar en máxima forma. Estos culturistas eran realmente lo mejor de lo mejor.
Gran vídeo como siempre. Impresionante Frank Zane, lástima que le faltara un pelín de volumen bajo mi punto de vista, pero claro, con más volumen seguramente que no tuviera ese punto de definición
Gracias, la verdad es que Zane pese a su grave problema a semanas del evento presentó un cuerpo increíble. El elenco de culturistas fue brutal y el nivel también.
It's always interesting to read the comments about the 1980 Olympia. The top 5, as good as they all were, all had flawed physiques. No such thing as perfection I suppose. However the Weider factor is what mattered more than anything else in the 1980s. Any one of the top 5 could have won it. The 1981 result was the worst imo.
Thanks for your comment. The MrO of 1981 will also be a good theme. If you have not seen it I recommend the new video -> ruclips.net/video/XbfuMJeqswI/видео.html (Comment what you think)
@@alcidesrios7222 I think Zane and Nubret in South Africa. Arnie had badly under developed legs compared to the opposition in SA and even less in 80. He was well documented to not like training legs and didn't give them other than a cursory half assed attempt. This puts to bed the myth of his all out go forward mentality. He didn't like leg work ? Who does? Anyone that thinks anything different needs to give his head a shake.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines I’m going by this video. In this video they both look a bit better than Arnold. Although Arnold when he does his signature poses, he is just surpass them all.
@@justdynee Serge looked amazing in SA from the movie pumping iron. It was close. Arnold was in amazing shape though in 75. Serge’s physique is amazing.
Err no leg comparisons??!!! Arnold was on stilts that year, his legs were reasonably defined but with zero mass, and the rest of him was way down, a far cry from what he brought in 74 when he was fantastic. Mentzer in fifth was a joke, yep, 1980 was def a bad one, but then along came the nonsense in 81!
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Paul Graham... need I say more?? IFBB has NEVER been clean, Franco won the next year with horrible legs and huge gyno and Chris Dickerson in 1982 (in much worse condition than his best in 1980). Defend others sometimes OTHER than Arnold, especially if he wasn't in a contest...
arnold’s movement are so elegent , nobody beats that!
Mike Mentzer was the clear standout winner.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines HAHAHAHAHAH YOU ALWAYS BEEFING MENTZER ON COMMENTS
Finally a comment that makes sense 🙏
Thank you
lol dude finished a generous 5th
Thanks!!
Arnold no iba fino ese año, el vídeo lo deja muy claro. Gracias por el magnífico trabajo qué haces.
Arnold's Lats disappears when doing an Ab and thigh comparison with Mentzer. He was U-shaped instead of sought after V-taper. Arnold's waist and hips were wide, making him look inferior. Even Arnold's standout side chest was elapsed by Mike. Mike's execution was better. Better delts, triceps forearms, and bringing the chest out more. Mike's abs and serratus were superior as well
Arnold at 90% is better than the rest at 100%
Arnold projected he was winner and pulled it off. Mentzer was thin in the chest when he spread wide his arms. And his short arms made him appear thick. But he was closer to fourth to me over Boyer Coe.
Good work!
How is everybody increased in size by 1.25 compared to Arnold, I need that editing software too
The best 1980 video
Frank Zane a pesar de estar pequeño era el olympia. Arnold se imponía a Mike Mentzer en el segundo puesto por carisma y gran experiencia para posar, a pesar de no estar en máxima forma. Estos culturistas eran realmente lo mejor de lo mejor.
Gran vídeo como siempre. Impresionante Frank Zane, lástima que le faltara un pelín de volumen bajo mi punto de vista, pero claro, con más volumen seguramente que no tuviera ese punto de definición
Gracias, la verdad es que Zane pese a su grave problema a semanas del evento presentó un cuerpo increíble. El elenco de culturistas fue brutal y el nivel también.
lol clearly not sizing correctly. Arnold dwarfed them side by side
It's always interesting to read the comments about the 1980 Olympia. The top 5, as good as they all were, all had flawed physiques. No such thing as perfection I suppose. However the Weider factor is what mattered more than anything else in the 1980s. Any one of the top 5 could have won it. The 1981 result was the worst imo.
Thanks for your comment. The MrO of 1981 will also be a good theme. If you have not seen it I recommend the new video -> ruclips.net/video/XbfuMJeqswI/видео.html (Comment what you think)
FRANK ZANE= NR.1
1.Metzee
2.Arnold
3.Dickerson
4.Zane
5.Coe
IMO
1. Mentzer
2. Dickerson
3. Zane
4. Schwarzenegger
5. Coe
This and South Africa convinced me the fix was in. No way in hell Arnie wins this or possibly even make top three. No legs.
Should have been either Mike Metzer and or Frank Zane from this video
@@alcidesrios7222 I think Zane and Nubret in South Africa. Arnie had badly under developed legs compared to the opposition in SA and even less in 80. He was well documented to not like training legs and didn't give them other than a cursory half assed attempt. This puts to bed the myth of his all out go forward mentality. He didn't like leg work ? Who does? Anyone that thinks anything different needs to give his head a shake.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines I'm 60 and do more with more weight than he did. I'm natural to boot.
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines I’m going by this video. In this video they both look a bit better than Arnold. Although Arnold when he does his signature poses, he is just surpass them all.
@@justdynee Serge looked amazing in SA from the movie pumping iron. It was close. Arnold was in amazing shape though in 75. Serge’s physique is amazing.
Err no leg comparisons??!!! Arnold was on stilts that year, his legs were reasonably defined but with zero mass, and the rest of him was way down, a far cry from what he brought in 74 when he was fantastic. Mentzer in fifth was a joke, yep, 1980 was def a bad one, but then along came the nonsense in 81!
Thanks for sharing your opinion. 💪💪❤
Mentzer sidechest crushed Arnold's
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Yes, Arnold's LEGS were the clear standout, not Mentzer's chest...🤪
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines Paul Graham... need I say more?? IFBB has NEVER been clean, Franco won the next year with horrible legs and huge gyno and Chris Dickerson in 1982 (in much worse condition than his best in 1980). Defend others sometimes OTHER than Arnold, especially if he wasn't in a contest...
Reeeeee
Boyer Coe was in far better shape
@Old Skool Bodybuilding Routines the competition was fixed.
Except he wasn’t and he was smaller
But where are the legs?!!!...🤔
in the next video 😉😉😉😉👍👍
@@THEGOLDENERAOFBODYBUILDING They are clearly not here