I wanted to express my gratitude for your work, because your videos and scientific papers on deep learned CT image reconstruction have been invaluable references in the making of my bachelor thesis. I wish you all the best and continued success, professor.
Andrew, Great video! I have learned about the double slit experiment. I do have few questions. I have taken a Laser sent into a SMALL Slit and the laser made an interference pattern with ONE slit. WHY? (It seems to look like a 2DFFT wave, depending on what angle you have a slit. Also if the laser is shined though a small hole, the Interference waves look round) As for the Electron making an interference pattern it seems to me that the Slits have a charge on them and that is moving the Electron around and that's why the electron makes that interference pattern. Have you done this experiment?
Thanks for the interesting comments and questions! For one slit, it needs to be regarded in fact as an array of smaller slits (Huygen's principle), and so there is still an interference pattern. Hence a "rect" top hat function becomes something like a sinc function on the screen (relating to your Fourier point). The electron interference pattern is not related to charges (as it is directly comparable to the light / photon case, also no charges involved). I have not done any of these experiments, but the light through a single slit would be fun to try one day!
@@AndrewJReader Thanks for your response. I have google Huygens Principle and that does answer my question. BUT IF the Huygens Principle it true than the Double slit will proving light way are wave might not be true. If you try the Single slit , you might want to experiment with two slit and two lasers. Experiment with different angle slits and different distances of the slit. I have see that different Laser wave length lasers changes the diffraction pattern. Thank you for your hard work . !!
If u try to predict where a tornado will go depending on its speed and direction you can only predict with a similar level of certainty where it will be detected at a future time. In quantum physics they are waves of tiny spherical vortexes not particles. Moving inside a lattice made of Planck sized elastic tubes/strings. That's how EMR moves, through quamtum wires. Suction is what holds everything together and gravity is how the lattice is warped by the amount of vortexes lumped in any area, thereby defining the path of energy. When trying to get particle physicists to understand the wave equation is describing a wave detected at single points not a particle, it's like talking to high tech flat Earthers, they say energy is a particle but has a wave function which isn't actually a wave! it's like particle physicists seeing people in a boat and saying "Oh look those people are moving mysteriously across the water" then we say "no but they're in a boat" to which they say "no there's no boat that's just a boat function that gives the illusion of a boat, we build nuclear bombs, computers to give corporations more control over everything and everyone, we control all physics taught in Universities and peer review journals, we have built ai which is now controlling drones killing people in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and other places with no human 2nd opinion. So trust us we are smarter than you there is no boat, the Universe has no fixed laws at the quantum level, it's not that we can't explain them using the particle model, it's just the Universe is random and bizarre and those people move mysteriously across the water in a boat function, anyone who says otherwise is just a nut job, even if they have the Math that supports it, so don't look." The Theory of Everything has been around for 5 years with 2 math proofs to Goldbachs conjecture and proof a 2nd loop is impossible in the Collatz Conjecture but the Big bang particle industry have kept it suppressed time and time again, with hysterical particle physicists unable to bear to look or listen to any evidence that for a split second says they are wrong, who keep taking down this guys channel, and refusing to acknowledge his math proofs it's looking more like more doom every day for humanity, the TOE and experiments to prove it are on channel "Breaking physics (beyond the SMOPP)" most experiments and the 2 math proofs are in 1 minute shorts. There is no collapse there is only a change of focus on the wave, what changes the focus is the real mystery but this channel has experiments to test for what it is.
I wanted to express my gratitude for your work, because your videos and scientific papers on deep learned CT image reconstruction have been invaluable references in the making of my bachelor thesis. I wish you all the best and continued success, professor.
Thank you so much for the feedback, means a lot. Likewise, very best wishes for your next steps.
Very nicely done. I hope your channel grows.
Thanks so much for your support!
Andrew, Great video! I have learned about the double slit experiment. I do have few questions. I have taken a Laser sent into a SMALL Slit and the laser made an interference pattern with ONE slit. WHY? (It seems to look like a 2DFFT wave, depending on what angle you have a slit. Also if the laser is shined though a small hole, the Interference waves look round) As for the Electron making an interference pattern it seems to me that the Slits have a charge on them and that is moving the Electron around and that's why the electron makes that interference pattern. Have you done this experiment?
Thanks for the interesting comments and questions! For one slit, it needs to be regarded in fact as an array of smaller slits (Huygen's principle), and so there is still an interference pattern. Hence a "rect" top hat function becomes something like a sinc function on the screen (relating to your Fourier point). The electron interference pattern is not related to charges (as it is directly comparable to the light / photon case, also no charges involved). I have not done any of these experiments, but the light through a single slit would be fun to try one day!
@@AndrewJReader Thanks for your response. I have google Huygens Principle and that does answer my question. BUT IF the Huygens Principle it true than the Double slit will proving light way are wave might not be true. If you try the Single slit , you might want to experiment with two slit and two lasers. Experiment with different angle slits and different distances of the slit. I have see that different Laser wave length lasers changes the diffraction pattern. Thank you for your hard work . !!
If u try to predict where a tornado will go depending on its speed and direction you can only predict with a similar level of certainty where it will be detected at a future time. In quantum physics they are waves of tiny spherical vortexes not particles. Moving inside a lattice made of Planck sized elastic tubes/strings. That's how EMR moves, through quamtum wires. Suction is what holds everything together and gravity is how the lattice is warped by the amount of vortexes lumped in any area, thereby defining the path of energy.
When trying to get particle physicists to understand the wave equation is describing a wave detected at single points not a particle, it's like talking to high tech flat Earthers, they say energy is a particle but has a wave function which isn't actually a wave! it's like particle physicists seeing people in a boat and saying "Oh look those people are moving mysteriously across the water" then we say "no but they're in a boat" to which they say "no there's no boat that's just a boat function that gives the illusion of a boat, we build nuclear bombs, computers to give corporations more control over everything and everyone, we control all physics taught in Universities and peer review journals, we have built ai which is now controlling drones killing people in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and other places with no human 2nd opinion. So trust us we are smarter than you there is no boat, the Universe has no fixed laws at the quantum level, it's not that we can't explain them using the particle model, it's just the Universe is random and bizarre and those people move mysteriously across the water in a boat function, anyone who says otherwise is just a nut job, even if they have the Math that supports it, so don't look."
The Theory of Everything has been around for 5 years with 2 math proofs to Goldbachs conjecture and proof a 2nd loop is impossible in the Collatz Conjecture but the Big bang particle industry have kept it suppressed time and time again, with hysterical particle physicists unable to bear to look or listen to any evidence that for a split second says they are wrong, who keep taking down this guys channel, and refusing to acknowledge his math proofs it's looking more like more doom every day for humanity, the TOE and experiments to prove it are on channel "Breaking physics (beyond the SMOPP)" most experiments and the 2 math proofs are in 1 minute shorts.
There is no collapse there is only a change of focus on the wave, what changes the focus is the real mystery but this channel has experiments to test for what it is.