Aero socks, check. Funky smooth helmet, check. Top tube bag, frame bag, check. Water bottles everywhere, check. USWE pack, plus a hip bag, check. Didn't register, so no number plate. Being that I only usually pedal at about 50 watts on most rides anyway, I now expect the bike to accelerate on its own because I'm implemented so many watts savings. Thanks, awesome video.
The back hump thing for better aero is a thing outside of cycling too. Motorcycle racers normally have an aero hump on the back of their racing leathers to reduce drag as well.
@@jimjam218 the hump was never intended to be a safety feature. Its pretty soft and actually makes safety worse because the spine cant be straight while laying on the back after a crash.
It's not quite about keeping air attached when we're talking about cyclists, it's simply about filling the void (though attachment has to do with it). You have high pressure up front, and low pressure out the back, drag mostly boils down to that (the pressure differential). So there are two strategies you can use. First is texture so that air sticks to the body longer and creates a smaller low pressure zone behind you (hello aero socks). And second is stuffing. Yes, stuffing. Just put stuff in low pressure areas. It's that simple. Oh and helmets are not individual dependent, they're largely position dependent, people often mix up the two because everyone has a slightly different position (torso angle, head angle, neck angle and shoulder shrug).
This is the only wind tunnel video I’ve seen that actually answered the questions we all have without marketing BS mixed in.. Awesome work. I would have loved to see the numbers for that skin suit and S-works helmet tho 🤔
And destroying their equipment on top of that. I'll stick to my local races on hero gravel where I'm not wading through "peanut butter" mud or slashing my tires to shreds.
@@GravelRacer1 BWR Asheville $225. Local gravel series near me fetching $100+ to race on open plublic roads. Well over a $1 per mile to race my bike, no thanks.
Race promoters needs to actually enforce proper plate placement if the numbers are that crazy. Huge disadvantage to those who follow the rules. Amazing as always, DJ
or just make numbering aero optimized so people won't try to go around it. Whats wrong with putting it on the side, and maybe also having one front of the helmet? Dumb testing human nature
@@biscottigelato8574 It's funny, I do a time trial series that is $20/race and they give us this tiny adhesive strip to put on our helmets that records the timing via a chip. Why can't we get this when we are paying $200 for a race? It makes no sense.
The head wind aspect of aero is a good point. I see a lot of people hate on the higher speeds companies quote for aero savings but what you said makes a lot of sense.
Dylan, at which yaw angle have you performed the tests? What I’m after is that when you ride in real life, especially at gravel speeds, your effective wind angle is usually bigger than on tt (due to speed difference). Therefore, some items generating savings like bigger water bottle at 0 yaw might be costing you watts at 5-10degrees of yaw. I love the scientific approach, great vid as always!
A lot of surprising, but perhaps not so surprising results. Glad to hear a top tube bag not only doesn't increases, but decreased drag! The burrito bag makes complete sense and I'll still never understand why many folks in the rando scene still carry large handlebar bags. It's like a 400k ride isn't hard enough they want to make it harder. Great stuff, keep it up.
That was a pretty small bag he tested...make it larger, and at what point does it start being a "fairing" for the rider? I suspect that somewhat larger bags might actually be helpful (too a point...make them too big and too "square" and they could be worse). Not to mention, it's a good place to mount that mandatory number plate, and in a fashion that isn't flat or concave (like how it was shown being tested). It could be that it's the best solution for a front number plate...10W for a burrito bag w/number plate on it is better than 12.5W for the flat number plate ;-)
Jan from Rene Herse had mentioned some wind tunnel data he has that shows the big rando bags do act as a fairing decreasing drag like a motorcycle fairing.
@@JohnMcQueen Yeah...I wouldn't put too much stock in most of his testing. In the broad sense he gets things "right", but some of the details can be a bit stuffed (he doesn't know what he doesn't know about aero testing IMHO). He also made a blog post about how he had some on-ride descent data that indicated a huge rando bar bag on a round tubed bike was faster than an aero bike...but a quick perusal of the Strava file showed the top speeds he was reporting were obvious GPS-speed glitches. Take out the glitches and his rando bag rides had the slowest top speeds on the descents. He was made aware of that, but never corrected the post :-/
I've been so stoked for this episode after hearing about it on the Marginal Gains podcast where Josh answered my question about potential aero benefits of running a 1x setup vs 2x for unbound.
As much as I appreciate all the Intel, I have even greater appreciation for your willingness to ask the questions that everybody wants the answer to but is afraid to ask. So many channels published drivel as "content" cough..GCN. Thanks! Burrito bag stays home for Unbound 200 this year 😮
Money saving tip on aero helmets: Lazer offers an "Aeroshell" for a lot of their helmet models, which is a a plastic shell that clips onto the helmet to cover most of the vents and basically makes it an aero helmet. So for example if you buy the Lazer Strada plus an Aeroshell it's around half the price of the dedicated aero helmet model they offer.
@@filmaynard thanks for the information! I only got mine since fall so I couldn't really test it in hot conditions, but I suspected it might be a little to much for summer
I know you had a disclaimer at the beginning of the video expecting you might get some grief for a video like this. But my view is entirely the opposite of that. Thank you very much for sharing this information especially considering the investment of time and money from both yourself in the companies that are supporting you. Super cool and useful.🤘
Great video Dylan. Many of your savings from the wt are almost identical to my outdoor tests (protocol is 35kmh) which is awesome yet shocking as i wouldn't often trust the wt at these speeds! But good to know! The hoods to drops position at 35kmh is similarly low, 12W for me.
Another point in favor of running larger tires is if they allow you to spend more time in the aerobars. A favorite of mine are 2.1” thunder Burt’s… they give up nothing on rolling resistance but can float over loose stuff even while in the aerobars!
A combo of a fairly far back aero bar position (knees end up nearly hitting elbows) to be a bit less front heavy and the big tires really make a surprisingly stable setup. Of course still has its limits but yeah
A combo of a fairly far back aero bar position (knees end up nearly hitting elbows) to be a bit less front heavy and the big tires really make a surprisingly stable setup. Of course still has its limits but yeah
This is basically what Ted King said after winning with a lefty suspension. The fatigue prevention of the suspension allowed him to sit tucked for a great deal more of the race.
Great information. Love the SOG-leveling arguments. Thanks again for introducing a smidgen of sanity to all the vibe talk. It's always fascinating to learn there are still people (newbs?) who don't consider their speed while riding down hills as factors in the aero equation. Unbound may be flatter but it still has about 7-8000' elevation throughout the course. Most of the hills can be freewheeled down at 20mph and, if running any mid-section wheels you'll be able to get almost half way up the next one before putting down real power. The only difficult part for us less-powerful riders will be safely navigating all the mid-packers riding their brakes down the hills in search of their next flat. As for aero bars I use them to gain speed in the wind and, almost as importantly, for comfort on long rides; to take pressure off my hands for a spell. And thanks also for the pack numbers. Really. I have five (5!) run-specific hydration packs, three of which are light weight and two are somewhat aero but I'm now considering the Uswe which I've resisted in the past.
Lots of good info in this video. While it's gravel specific, there's a quite a bit of overlap that can be useful for randoneurring, where rides start at 200km. Slower speeds, more relaxed position, carrying bags and extra water, wider tires, with or without aerobars, etc. Over 200, 300, 400, or 600km, every watt matters. Also, I'd always opt for wider tires. The comfort, control, and puncture resistance gains far outweigh any aero penalty IMHO, especially if it allows you to use aerobars more often.
I'm a recreational gravel rider and only race say, 4 times a year and I aim to be... average, so this info is clearly not for me, but I can't help but stand in awe at the numbers. These gains, specially the position changes, are so massive, they might make even the local club ride more enjoyable. I'll be paying more attention to my position in the future!
Well, you never stop learning. Thanks for this. The hydration pack really surprised me. One idea for a possible future wind tunnel test would be a full frame bag.
I love this video and it’s a great resource. Quick point about aero bars though, anywhere you can use the aero bars you could also be in an aero hoods position so the penalty on those sections would be 10.3W and not the full 41.4W, while the gain from not having them is 4.5W when you don’t use them. This means you would have to use them 44% of the time to see a benefit which you said is not possible . This makes some assumptions about your core strength and wind speed, but aero bars aren’t actually that much faster if you compare them to the best alternative and not the worst.
But you cant hold an aero hoods position for that long. With comfy set up aero bars you will be still quite a lot faster and can relax your hands and butt. This makes quite a difference for many ultra races.
Nice to hear wearing backpack helps. I wear one because I am done stuffing everything in back pockets, now to hear I have been aero trailblazer all along.
Great vid. I am an aerospace engineer and not much surprises me and frankly delights me! Expect the unexpected in aerodynamics. I am wondering how much effort you would gain closing up the frame entirely. I saw a vid of one of the gravel winners with the top half closed of with some self made plastic housing to contain water and tools and such.
@@chuckyfox9284 yes, did my usual road group ride on a gravel bike with full frame bag. (more fun riding to and from) No issues with head or tailwind, but in the crosswind sections I struggled. Got dropped (and normally don't) on a crosswind section. The joys of living in the world's third windiest city.
Very well done, Dylan, and consistent in quality with all your other videos. I really like it that you're able to make fun of yourself. Keep it up! It lends credibility to your presentation (and makes it more enjoyable).
Great video. Many will forget this is "marginal gains." One thing I didn't see tested is different types of drop bars, and width. One of the things I took from the video is the front "splitter"/disruption sucked more watts (handle bar bag, number plate, etc.) than the rear changes did.
I did a time trial and they had us pin the numbers on the left rib cage area of our jersey. Myself being smaller couldn't help but notice larger riders have it much easier pinning the number, while maintaining a more flush surface. We should use those programmable LED Lights like you see on bike spokes (or something along those lines).
As a motorcycle rider I can tell you that you can easily feel the aero difference while wearing a backpack. At speeds of 80 MPH plus it is easily discernible, probably depending a bit upon the bike aerodynamics and the riding position, but definitely easily felt. That is one of the pretty cool accidental life discoveries I happened upon long before the back humps in motorcycle racing leathers were a thing. The bummer for MC riding is that having a backpack attached if/when you crash is not ideal.
Best aero video so far. I am an amateur but I love driving my touringbike with aerobars to work :p. I knew it makes a lot of difference, now I better understand were that difference really comes from.
A few suggestions: Try transient wind tunnel. Seriously more expensive, but much closer to the real world data, because IRL the wind never attacks a vehicle from a single yaw angle for any prolonged period. Re tyre sizes: that ideal platform in the tunnel is not the same as gravel in terms of "shakey-shakey", you know. So since bigger tyres at lower pressures are vastly easier on the rider, that would be much less fatigue accumulation over the course of the race. As it has been brilliantly illustrated by Cadex at Ironman, that will allow one to ride faster for longer. You cannot test for stuff like this in the tunnel. Or you have to at least find one of those smart treadmills - you know, those "for the ultimate Strava experience" and plot a long course with constantly adjusting grade, or something. Ideally, you'd glue assorted bits of cable (to simulate roots) and actual gravel to the treadmill belt - to feel those pesky shocks and vibrations.
Dear Dylan, we love seeing your name in our results so please don't bend, fold, our slap that number plate on anything but your handlebars. Much love, - LTGP
Thnx Dylan! As always, very thorough and deep data investigation. Can you share your opinion on which power zone calculation approach is more relevant based on FTP test? There are a few system in Trainingpeaks, meanwhile Wahoo makes it their own way, meanwhile Garmin makes it different, meanwhile Strava and Zwift suggest another one etc... And the same situation for the HR zones as well.
Dylan, thank you for an awesome video. Could you please speak a little to the sensitivity of the wind tunnel measurements and calibration which you experienced during your study? How repeatable are the tunnel measurements back to back with everything being kept the same? What is the smallest increment of CdA or the equivalent W that the tunnel could measure? If your testing spanned more than 1 day, can you share your control run results across the testing days?
very surprising results! although individual setups account for a huge amount of outliers and inconsistency, this has still changed how I think about aerodynamics in the long run
Awesome video. For calculating how much time you have to ride in the aerobars, should we be comparing "In Aerobars" to "Aero Hoods", the next best aero position, and likely the position you'll take if you don't have aero bars installed? So the aero bars gain 6:00-ish minutes (vs aero hoods) and cost 3:20 (while upright). Doesn't that math work out to say you need to spend over 1/3 of the race in aero bars (6*1/3 ~= 3:20*2/3) versus the next best aero position (1/3 of the race in aero hoods position, 2/3 in upright).
You 2 crack me up. I knew aero bars were a big difference. in 1986 I did 5 flat in Kona. The next year 4:40 with Scott DH bars. Thanks for saving me $$. I'll just buy aero sox vs compression sox. They're cheaper. We stayed at the same Ultra Luxurious hotel in Beaver.
I’d be interested in seeing results of different aerobar positions. I read one article where the mantis position was significantly faster than the more parallel to the ground position. Also, what are fastest sunglasses, gloves(or not) and also is a front derailleur slowing you down or giving an aero advantage?
What about using the hydration pack on your chest rather than your back. IIRC, Frank Schleck did this in the Tour de France and created a huge fuss years ago. Using the pack on your chest rounds out the airflow and makes things faster.
I am not surprised about the backpack. They once did aero tests for skiing and found that long hair should not be put under the helmet in the aero position. This way the hair gaps the dip between the head and the back. This leads to better air flow along the back.
I always figured the hydration pack would be faster since it seems like it would act as an aerodynamic fairing. The big surprise for me is that bigger bottles are more aero. I also am surprised that the seat tube bottle is more aero than the downtube bottle.
Yeah that was a good take away with the seat tube bottle although most my rides require more than 1x bottle, perhaps one in the pocket and one in the seat tube cage, guess it is experiencing more disturbed air than when on the down tube.
@@gregmorrison7320 my guess is that it helps the rear tire be more efficient than the downtube bottle helps the front tire... Only thing that makes sense to me anyway. Now I'm wondering why the pros don't just hang onto an empty bottle in their shirt pocket all the time.
Awesome video. Like you said, it is surprising to have that much new knowledge about effective changes for gravel racing come to light. Now I got to go get by aero gravel socks ...
My biggest takeaway from this is that today - for free - I can just start throwing a water bottle in my back pocket and see gains. Fantastic video as always.
Thanks for the watts to time savings connection for slower (mortal or recreational riders, or even bikepackers). Something to really think about for those long ride (above a person's regular ride length where they'll be going slower to conserve energy and complete the ride).
Aero hoods position was the most dramatic yet practical gain for most riders. Minimal penalties for wider tires, hydration and frame bags means staying fresh, hydrated and fueled over long rides is the play and suffering needlessly is as misguided and self-defeating as a reasonable person would expect.
My compliments to the chef, Dylan, either you or that backwards hat guy. Thanks for showing us all of these aero gains and penalties and I'd be interested in knowing, next time you are there, is whether there's a gain or not with those two-bottle behind-the-saddle carriers. And yes, the aero gain for a bottle in a back jersey pocket is mind-blowing, that and the aero sock advantage seem easily attainable. Thanks again for the news we can use, to quote the Top-40 newscasters back when stations were required to run hourly newscasts. "News you can use" took a bit of the sting out of stopping the music for news.
I think one of the big problems for those carriers, at least wrt a gravel race, is you are not going to know if you've lost a bottle on the chunk and could be in a bad place if you blow through an aid station thinking you've more water than you do.
@@cjohnson3836 Thanks for your reply and yeah, I bought one new way back when off the discount table in a local shop, and I've always liked it, in spite of its tri origins. 😀
I just posted a link to the test that included that bag among others. The downside of that bag is ~4l of heavier stuff (ie a bladder) changes the handling. If you keep it light, it works well with aerobars. I suppose you could crank the bag to normal handlebars with voile nanos but I haven’t tested that.
The large saddle bag drag coefficient reduction is not surprising. Have a look at the saddle used on Thierry Marie's TT bike in the 1992 Tour de France (he was a short TT/prologue specialist way back). The large fairing behind the saddle help with air flow and reduced aerodynamic drag. The UCI killed that pretty quickly. An extremely interesting video. Thanks!
There's a (small) caveat for the aero socks, that is, this is almost a recurring cost. Once it's loose its grip to the calves, you have to buy one more pair. For the other equipment (helmet, tyre, etc.), you just by them once.
Already thought that raceplate on my MTB was slowing me down... Took it off today before watching this vid :) I also ordered an aero handlebar with a 36cm width instead of my default 42cm round handlebar on my race bike. Need to spend some more time in puppy paw position which saves a big amount of watts. Although I always feel I can put more power on the pedals when sitting on the hoods.
You forgot to test what the long distance TT specialists do: hydration bladder inside the jersey/skinsuit. Most TT specialists put the bladder on their stomach, but you could also test it on the back as well.
I think the most interesting test would be non-aero gravel frame with 700X40 tire versus aero gravel frame and the same tire. In other words, do the bigger tires disrupt the airflow so much that the frame shape is largely irrelevant?
Aero socks, check. Funky smooth helmet, check. Top tube bag, frame bag, check. Water bottles everywhere, check. USWE pack, plus a hip bag, check. Didn't register, so no number plate. Being that I only usually pedal at about 50 watts on most rides anyway, I now expect the bike to accelerate on its own because I'm implemented so many watts savings.
Thanks, awesome video.
You sir, are a winner!
After more than one year of riding aero, did the bike manage to pedal an entire season on its own?
The back hump thing for better aero is a thing outside of cycling too. Motorcycle racers normally have an aero hump on the back of their racing leathers to reduce drag as well.
So true
That hump stems from preventing the riders head and spine smashing backwards in the event of a crash. Aero was an after thought.
@@jimjam218 That's what I thought, but articles suggest its just aero.
@@aaron___6014 Damn. I learned something. I also thought the motorcycle humpback was crash protection.
@@jimjam218 the hump was never intended to be a safety feature. Its pretty soft and actually makes safety worse because the spine cant be straight while laying on the back after a crash.
It's not quite about keeping air attached when we're talking about cyclists, it's simply about filling the void (though attachment has to do with it). You have high pressure up front, and low pressure out the back, drag mostly boils down to that (the pressure differential). So there are two strategies you can use. First is texture so that air sticks to the body longer and creates a smaller low pressure zone behind you (hello aero socks). And second is stuffing. Yes, stuffing. Just put stuff in low pressure areas. It's that simple. Oh and helmets are not individual dependent, they're largely position dependent, people often mix up the two because everyone has a slightly different position (torso angle, head angle, neck angle and shoulder shrug).
This is the only wind tunnel video I’ve seen that actually answered the questions we all have without marketing BS mixed in.. Awesome work. I would have loved to see the numbers for that skin suit and S-works helmet tho 🤔
BHD approves this comment 😎
Yes, thank goodness we didn't have to hear about "for the win" one time.
when will zipp just go ahead and make a gravel aero disc wheel with like 23mm internal width, optimized for 45mm? BHD demands it...
The only problem is cracked rims from the jumping rocks. Man that would put the warranties to the test.
@@kaseycarpenter73+28mm internal at minimum
The only thing ruining gravel are the ever increasing ridiculously high entry fees.
Absolutely. Spending more to race on a dirt road than an entry ticket to Disneyworld isn't normal.
And for what exactly are we paying? People should just start free to join races via facebook and force paid events to ACTUALLY BRING VALUE.
And destroying their equipment on top of that. I'll stick to my local races on hero gravel where I'm not wading through "peanut butter" mud or slashing my tires to shreds.
How much are the fees your paying? Where I am they are between $100 and $150. Local races thou.
@@GravelRacer1 BWR Asheville $225. Local gravel series near me fetching $100+ to race on open plublic roads. Well over a $1 per mile to race my bike, no thanks.
Race promoters needs to actually enforce proper plate placement if the numbers are that crazy. Huge disadvantage to those who follow the rules. Amazing as always, DJ
MidSouth had people walking the starting corral to make sure people 1- had a number at all and 2- had them mounted appropriately.
or just make numbering aero optimized so people won't try to go around it. Whats wrong with putting it on the side, and maybe also having one front of the helmet? Dumb testing human nature
@@biscottigelato8574 It's funny, I do a time trial series that is $20/race and they give us this tiny adhesive strip to put on our helmets that records the timing via a chip. Why can't we get this when we are paying $200 for a race? It makes no sense.
I gravel race with 28mm slicks treated with flex seal. I am the future.
And a TT bike
@@kevrasx scratch that, naked and flannel/ripped jeans body paint is the future
I know it's not really gravel...but I did BWR with 28mm slicks on a SuperSix Evo.
Sorry, seen plenty of this already.
I sawed this bike in half….
The head wind aspect of aero is a good point. I see a lot of people hate on the higher speeds companies quote for aero savings but what you said makes a lot of sense.
Dylan, at which yaw angle have you performed the tests? What I’m after is that when you ride in real life, especially at gravel speeds, your effective wind angle is usually bigger than on tt (due to speed difference). Therefore, some items generating savings like bigger water bottle at 0 yaw might be costing you watts at 5-10degrees of yaw.
I love the scientific approach, great vid as always!
A lot of surprising, but perhaps not so surprising results. Glad to hear a top tube bag not only doesn't increases, but decreased drag! The burrito bag makes complete sense and I'll still never understand why many folks in the rando scene still carry large handlebar bags. It's like a 400k ride isn't hard enough they want to make it harder. Great stuff, keep it up.
That was a pretty small bag he tested...make it larger, and at what point does it start being a "fairing" for the rider? I suspect that somewhat larger bags might actually be helpful (too a point...make them too big and too "square" and they could be worse). Not to mention, it's a good place to mount that mandatory number plate, and in a fashion that isn't flat or concave (like how it was shown being tested). It could be that it's the best solution for a front number plate...10W for a burrito bag w/number plate on it is better than 12.5W for the flat number plate ;-)
Jan from Rene Herse had mentioned some wind tunnel data he has that shows the big rando bags do act as a fairing decreasing drag like a motorcycle fairing.
@@JohnMcQueen Yeah...I wouldn't put too much stock in most of his testing. In the broad sense he gets things "right", but some of the details can be a bit stuffed (he doesn't know what he doesn't know about aero testing IMHO). He also made a blog post about how he had some on-ride descent data that indicated a huge rando bar bag on a round tubed bike was faster than an aero bike...but a quick perusal of the Strava file showed the top speeds he was reporting were obvious GPS-speed glitches. Take out the glitches and his rando bag rides had the slowest top speeds on the descents. He was made aware of that, but never corrected the post :-/
@@tanhalt Interesting, thanks for the additional details
You and Silca are a great pairing. Look forward to more!
I've been so stoked for this episode after hearing about it on the Marginal Gains podcast where Josh answered my question about potential aero benefits of running a 1x setup vs 2x for unbound.
With and without mud comparisons too.
I would loved to see aero bottles tested in the future
Would be nice to know the error margins for these tests since a lot of the results are in the +-1W range
Wow man. That part about aerodynamics being just as important at slower speeds is genuinly eye opening.
This is excellent!! Another contribution to the sport, Dylan. Thank you for your time, effort and focus.
As much as I appreciate all the Intel, I have even greater appreciation for your willingness to ask the questions that everybody wants the answer to but is afraid to ask. So many channels published drivel as "content" cough..GCN. Thanks! Burrito bag stays home for Unbound 200 this year 😮
Even though I'm one of these Roadies you speak of I still watch all your vids. Great content and really insightful.
I learn more about road cycling watching this gravel dweeb than I do watching road cycling channels
Money saving tip on aero helmets: Lazer offers an "Aeroshell" for a lot of their helmet models, which is a a plastic shell that clips onto the helmet to cover most of the vents and basically makes it an aero helmet. So for example if you buy the Lazer Strada plus an Aeroshell it's around half the price of the dedicated aero helmet model they offer.
Kabuto has that only on the Aero R1 and R2 if you want other options and it comes with a face shield magnetic clip on.
The Aeroshell is also hot as balls. I use one on my Lazer Z1, but only when it’s cold out!
@@filmaynard Yep winter or TT use
@@filmaynard thanks for the information! I only got mine since fall so I couldn't really test it in hot conditions, but I suspected it might be a little to much for summer
Electric tape for the win.
I know you had a disclaimer at the beginning of the video expecting you might get some grief for a video like this. But my view is entirely the opposite of that.
Thank you very much for sharing this information especially considering the investment of time and money from both yourself in the companies that are supporting you. Super cool and useful.🤘
That's why my TT bike is going to have a custom seat rail mounted carbon fiber 'tool box' that looks mysteriously like a ducks tail. Great vid.
very like motorcycles tail
@@8paolo96 you got it!
Great video Dylan. Many of your savings from the wt are almost identical to my outdoor tests (protocol is 35kmh) which is awesome yet shocking as i wouldn't often trust the wt at these speeds! But good to know! The hoods to drops position at 35kmh is similarly low, 12W for me.
New it!! About the pack!
Did a 1/2 iron with a pack, got made fun, but had best time recorded to date in that distance.
did you use for both ride and run? Tell us more.....
@@Selfrighteouscyclist it was just for the bike. I am going to try it with the run in Ohio 70.3
Top notch content as always, Dylan. Great partnership with Silca you have!
Another point in favor of running larger tires is if they allow you to spend more time in the aerobars. A favorite of mine are 2.1” thunder Burt’s… they give up nothing on rolling resistance but can float over loose stuff even while in the aerobars!
Very good point. Comfort is so critical to staying on the skis.
You don't get nervous staying on the aerobars over heavy gravel?
A combo of a fairly far back aero bar position (knees end up nearly hitting elbows) to be a bit less front heavy and the big tires really make a surprisingly stable setup. Of course still has its limits but yeah
A combo of a fairly far back aero bar position (knees end up nearly hitting elbows) to be a bit less front heavy and the big tires really make a surprisingly stable setup. Of course still has its limits but yeah
This is basically what Ted King said after winning with a lefty suspension. The fatigue prevention of the suspension allowed him to sit tucked for a great deal more of the race.
Great information. Love the SOG-leveling arguments. Thanks again for introducing a smidgen of sanity to all the vibe talk. It's always fascinating to learn there are still people (newbs?) who don't consider their speed while riding down hills as factors in the aero equation. Unbound may be flatter but it still has about 7-8000' elevation throughout the course. Most of the hills can be freewheeled down at 20mph and, if running any mid-section wheels you'll be able to get almost half way up the next one before putting down real power. The only difficult part for us less-powerful riders will be safely navigating all the mid-packers riding their brakes down the hills in search of their next flat. As for aero bars I use them to gain speed in the wind and, almost as importantly, for comfort on long rides; to take pressure off my hands for a spell. And thanks also for the pack numbers. Really. I have five (5!) run-specific hydration packs, three of which are light weight and two are somewhat aero but I'm now considering the Uswe which I've resisted in the past.
I hope you can next test a full frame bag (for containing an Apidura frame bladder).
Thank you Dylan
The lower speed , watts saved, and time, make so much sense 🤯
That was an awesome research! Finally someone addressed the elephant in the room !!!!!!!!!!!!
Lots of good info in this video. While it's gravel specific, there's a quite a bit of overlap that can be useful for randoneurring, where rides start at 200km. Slower speeds, more relaxed position, carrying bags and extra water, wider tires, with or without aerobars, etc. Over 200, 300, 400, or 600km, every watt matters. Also, I'd always opt for wider tires. The comfort, control, and puncture resistance gains far outweigh any aero penalty IMHO, especially if it allows you to use aerobars more often.
On rough gravel on a long course - comfort is a huge benefit of wider tires
Finishing faster is typically the most comfortable position.
I'm a recreational gravel rider and only race say, 4 times a year and I aim to be... average, so this info is clearly not for me, but I can't help but stand in awe at the numbers. These gains, specially the position changes, are so massive, they might make even the local club ride more enjoyable. I'll be paying more attention to my position in the future!
Preach on the low speed savings!!!!! Savings are savings.
Well, you never stop learning. Thanks for this. The hydration pack really surprised me.
One idea for a possible future wind tunnel test would be a full frame bag.
Full frame bag with hydration bladder inside rather than in a backpack.
The first no bullshit video I've seen about aero savings. Good job!
I love this video and it’s a great resource. Quick point about aero bars though, anywhere you can use the aero bars you could also be in an aero hoods position so the penalty on those sections would be 10.3W and not the full 41.4W, while the gain from not having them is 4.5W when you don’t use them. This means you would have to use them 44% of the time to see a benefit which you said is not possible . This makes some assumptions about your core strength and wind speed, but aero bars aren’t actually that much faster if you compare them to the best alternative and not the worst.
But you cant hold an aero hoods position for that long. With comfy set up aero bars you will be still quite a lot faster and can relax your hands and butt. This makes quite a difference for many ultra races.
Nice to hear wearing backpack helps. I wear one because I am done stuffing everything in back pockets, now to hear I have been aero trailblazer all along.
Excellent job putting all that together. Planning a 200 mi road event in Jul. Thanks man. And thanks Silca. Using some of their stuff.
Putting a water bottle in your jersey basically gives your body an aero headtube like shape (elongated). 3.6W is crazy though.
Great vid. I am an aerospace engineer and not much surprises me and frankly delights me! Expect the unexpected in aerodynamics. I am wondering how much effort you would gain closing up the frame entirely. I saw a vid of one of the gravel winners with the top half closed of with some self made plastic housing to contain water and tools and such.
Like fairings?
Do you know if closing up the frame would slow you down when you have side wind?
@@chuckyfox9284 depending on the angle and speed it might even act as a sail and make you faster. but it surely could sway the other way around too.
@@chuckyfox9284 yes, did my usual road group ride on a gravel bike with full frame bag. (more fun riding to and from) No issues with head or tailwind, but in the crosswind sections I struggled. Got dropped (and normally don't) on a crosswind section. The joys of living in the world's third windiest city.
I wonder how well would fare old MTB with 26 inch wheels if you would cover them with discs.
I am suprised by the difference between a real areo socks and Silca knit aero socks
Very well done, Dylan, and consistent in quality with all your other videos. I really like it that you're able to make fun of yourself. Keep it up! It lends credibility to your presentation (and makes it more enjoyable).
We need more videos like this on the internet
Great video. Many will forget this is "marginal gains." One thing I didn't see tested is different types of drop bars, and width. One of the things I took from the video is the front "splitter"/disruption sucked more watts (handle bar bag, number plate, etc.) than the rear changes did.
I am looking forward to see a lot of bikes loaded out like they are going on a 3 week bike-packing trip
I did a time trial and they had us pin the numbers on the left rib cage area of our jersey. Myself being smaller couldn't help but notice larger riders have it much easier pinning the number, while maintaining a more flush surface. We should use those programmable LED Lights like you see on bike spokes (or something along those lines).
Real TT riders use 3M Super 77 adhesive and glue the number on ;-)
@@tanhalt is that the stuff Clark Griswold used in Christmas Vacation? :)
As a motorcycle rider I can tell you that you can easily feel the aero difference while wearing a backpack. At speeds of 80 MPH plus it is easily discernible, probably depending a bit upon the bike aerodynamics and the riding position, but definitely easily felt. That is one of the pretty cool accidental life discoveries I happened upon long before the back humps in motorcycle racing leathers were a thing. The bummer for MC riding is that having a backpack attached if/when you crash is not ideal.
Best aero video so far. I am an amateur but I love driving my touringbike with aerobars to work :p. I knew it makes a lot of difference, now I better understand were that difference really comes from.
A few suggestions:
Try transient wind tunnel. Seriously more expensive, but much closer to the real world data, because IRL the wind never attacks a vehicle from a single yaw angle for any prolonged period.
Re tyre sizes: that ideal platform in the tunnel is not the same as gravel in terms of "shakey-shakey", you know. So since bigger tyres at lower pressures are vastly easier on the rider, that would be much less fatigue accumulation over the course of the race. As it has been brilliantly illustrated by Cadex at Ironman, that will allow one to ride faster for longer. You cannot test for stuff like this in the tunnel. Or you have to at least find one of those smart treadmills - you know, those "for the ultimate Strava experience" and plot a long course with constantly adjusting grade, or something. Ideally, you'd glue assorted bits of cable (to simulate roots) and actual gravel to the treadmill belt - to feel those pesky shocks and vibrations.
Suggestion for next wind tunnel test: Put Backwards Hat Dylan in the wind tunnel and stand back and watch time cease to exist.
The bottles close the space between the legs so less air passes between leg and frame/bottle -> less drag.
Thanks for the video! Great explanation about aero for us slower riders!
Well done insight and testing.
Great video, Dylan. This will be one of your most-watched videos is my guess.
Dear Dylan, we love seeing your name in our results so please don't bend, fold, our slap that number plate on anything but your handlebars.
Much love,
- LTGP
Thnx Dylan! As always, very thorough and deep data investigation. Can you share your opinion on which power zone calculation approach is more relevant based on FTP test? There are a few system in Trainingpeaks, meanwhile Wahoo makes it their own way, meanwhile Garmin makes it different, meanwhile Strava and Zwift suggest another one etc... And the same situation for the HR zones as well.
That graph at the beginning and your explanation is genius 👌
What I really want to see in your next test is applying all savings from this video and comparing all the potential saving to the actual savings.
You'll be hearing from Pete Stetina's lawyer.
Dylan, thank you for an awesome video. Could you please speak a little to the sensitivity of the wind tunnel measurements and calibration which you experienced during your study? How repeatable are the tunnel measurements back to back with everything being kept the same? What is the smallest increment of CdA or the equivalent W that the tunnel could measure? If your testing spanned more than 1 day, can you share your control run results across the testing days?
very surprising results! although individual setups account for a huge amount of outliers and inconsistency, this has still changed how I think about aerodynamics in the long run
Bravo. As always a brilliant vid backed up with proper science.
Your videos are a treasure of info, tech, and important knowledge. Thank you Dylan, for all you do. Cheers.
Awesome video. For calculating how much time you have to ride in the aerobars, should we be comparing "In Aerobars" to "Aero Hoods", the next best aero position, and likely the position you'll take if you don't have aero bars installed?
So the aero bars gain 6:00-ish minutes (vs aero hoods) and cost 3:20 (while upright). Doesn't that math work out to say you need to spend over 1/3 of the race in aero bars (6*1/3 ~= 3:20*2/3) versus the next best aero position (1/3 of the race in aero hoods position, 2/3 in upright).
You 2 crack me up. I knew aero bars were a big difference. in 1986 I did 5 flat in Kona. The next year 4:40 with Scott DH bars. Thanks for saving me $$. I'll just buy aero sox vs compression sox. They're cheaper. We stayed at the same Ultra Luxurious hotel in Beaver.
12:17 I'm gonna sue this channel for the cost of scraping my brain bits off the wall because that just BLEW MY MIND!
Great stuff Dylan 👍
I'm looking forward to seeing if that prototype Silca tail bag is release. It definitely would be a good investment to buy.
Love you done this, I'm always advocating for aero saving when possible even for bikepacking if you want to put a good milage
I've been waiting on this ever since I heard it leaked on the Silca podcast... and that shirt is awesome.
Dylan you are the man!
I’d be interested in seeing results of different aerobar positions. I read one article where the mantis position was significantly faster than the more parallel to the ground position. Also, what are fastest sunglasses, gloves(or not) and also is a front derailleur slowing you down or giving an aero advantage?
What about using the hydration pack on your chest rather than your back. IIRC, Frank Schleck did this in the Tour de France and created a huge fuss years ago. Using the pack on your chest rounds out the airflow and makes things faster.
I am not surprised about the backpack. They once did aero tests for skiing and found that long hair should not be put under the helmet in the aero position. This way the hair gaps the dip between the head and the back. This leads to better air flow along the back.
I always figured the hydration pack would be faster since it seems like it would act as an aerodynamic fairing. The big surprise for me is that bigger bottles are more aero. I also am surprised that the seat tube bottle is more aero than the downtube bottle.
Yeah that was a good take away with the seat tube bottle although most my rides require more than 1x bottle, perhaps one in the pocket and one in the seat tube cage, guess it is experiencing more disturbed air than when on the down tube.
@@gregmorrison7320 my guess is that it helps the rear tire be more efficient than the downtube bottle helps the front tire... Only thing that makes sense to me anyway.
Now I'm wondering why the pros don't just hang onto an empty bottle in their shirt pocket all the time.
Awesome video. Like you said, it is surprising to have that much new knowledge about effective changes for gravel racing come to light. Now I got to go get by aero gravel socks ...
My biggest takeaway from this is that today - for free - I can just start throwing a water bottle in my back pocket and see gains. Fantastic video as always.
I used 580mm flat Mtb bar with TT prolong. Was great.
Thanks for the watts to time savings connection for slower (mortal or recreational riders, or even bikepackers). Something to really think about for those long ride (above a person's regular ride length where they'll be going slower to conserve energy and complete the ride).
Aero hoods position was the most dramatic yet practical gain for most riders. Minimal penalties for wider tires, hydration and frame bags means staying fresh, hydrated and fueled over long rides is the play and suffering needlessly is as misguided and self-defeating as a reasonable person would expect.
Love it! One of your best videos, thank you!
My compliments to the chef, Dylan, either you or that backwards hat guy. Thanks for showing us all of these aero gains and penalties and I'd be interested in knowing, next time you are there, is whether there's a gain or not with those two-bottle behind-the-saddle carriers. And yes, the aero gain for a bottle in a back jersey pocket is mind-blowing, that and the aero sock advantage seem easily attainable. Thanks again for the news we can use, to quote the Top-40 newscasters back when stations were required to run hourly newscasts. "News you can use" took a bit of the sting out of stopping the music for news.
I think one of the big problems for those carriers, at least wrt a gravel race, is you are not going to know if you've lost a bottle on the chunk and could be in a bad place if you blow through an aid station thinking you've more water than you do.
@@cjohnson3836 Thanks for your reply and yeah, I bought one new way back when off the discount table in a local shop, and I've always liked it, in spite of its tri origins. 😀
I would be interested in seeing you try the Cyclite Aero Handlebar bag which I've heard is more aero than the control.
I just posted a link to the test that included that bag among others. The downside of that bag is ~4l of heavier stuff (ie a bladder) changes the handling. If you keep it light, it works well with aerobars. I suppose you could crank the bag to normal handlebars with voile nanos but I haven’t tested that.
The point about a 25km/h wind is exactly what needs to be made, people forget ground speed is not airspeed
4:47 so far... still watching... what amazing video bruh!
Awesome video. Thank you so much to you & Josh. You guys are great!!
The large saddle bag drag coefficient reduction is not surprising. Have a look at the saddle used on Thierry Marie's TT bike in the 1992 Tour de France (he was a short TT/prologue specialist way back). The large fairing behind the saddle help with air flow and reduced aerodynamic drag. The UCI killed that pretty quickly. An extremely interesting video. Thanks!
There's a (small) caveat for the aero socks, that is, this is almost a recurring cost. Once it's loose its grip to the calves, you have to buy one more pair. For the other equipment (helmet, tyre, etc.), you just by them once.
Already thought that raceplate on my MTB was slowing me down... Took it off today before watching this vid :)
I also ordered an aero handlebar with a 36cm width instead of my default 42cm round handlebar on my race bike. Need to spend some more time in puppy paw position which saves a big amount of watts. Although I always feel I can put more power on the pedals when sitting on the hoods.
I read somewhere that a baby seat can actually save watts.
Similar to how oscar egg broke the hour records in the 1800s
Essentially,the more you can fill in front triangle,bottles ,bag etc the more aero it is
Great insight yet again!
Huge value in this video! Thanks!
Absolutely stunning video!
ya'll may not like it, but he ain't lyin'.
Great stuff man. Thank you very much:
Turns out the old guy with the overstuffed saggy jersey pockets and massive saddlebag is actually more aero
You forgot to test what the long distance TT specialists do: hydration bladder inside the jersey/skinsuit. Most TT specialists put the bladder on their stomach, but you could also test it on the back as well.
I think the most interesting test would be non-aero gravel frame with 700X40 tire versus aero gravel frame and the same tire. In other words, do the bigger tires disrupt the airflow so much that the frame shape is largely irrelevant?
Add crank length to your aero testing, you will be in for a surprise.