Wargaming can't afford to pay the license fees for using such a remarkable piece of art as a battle result screen. Especially if the piece was painted by the man the myth the evil gnome overlord and master of the saltmines the mighty jingles himself! I'm writing to the moma next to get it diaplayed there! I forgot to mention that he is a huge benefactor of mine because he gave me an extra slice of bread for this positive Review of his Art!
Hey Jingles, Lightoller here. Thank you very much for this commentary and this beautiful masterpiece. I was asking myself the same question, why the fuck am I still alive? I certainly did a few mistakes in this game, but it was deffo fun to play. Oh and by the way I am a Belgian in a french The Glorious Bastards clan. PS. For those who have guessed it, Lightoller comes from the inspiring story of Charles Herbert Lightoller who first served on the Titanic and later on saved lives during the Dynamo operation in WW2 from Dunkerque.
And if I remember my French correctly, the last word is spelled Bâtards, which is a short variant of the baguette. So if Jingles had known his French, he would have had so much fun with that.
Ugh idk what you whiners are struggling with. According to the spreadsheet algorithm splitting up 2 radars negatively impacts their "destroyer sinky fun time" rating by 12%. Simple math.
true, so many people fail to understand the WG MM : there's the minus 2 rule, so having two tier 7 DD face two tier 8 DD is ok because of the minus two rule. 16 minus two = 14 so it's balanced. Another simple algorithm is the GFY algorithm. This allows the MM to throw a stock tier 8 in 8 tier 10 battles. Again, simple because tier 8 minus 8 battles = 0 therefore balanced in the GFY algorithm.
Well, 50% winrate is right at average. Unlike in World of Tanks (where 49% WR is average), draws are nearly impossible in World of Warships and thus 50% would be the average.
@@admiralfloofz658 I have never had a draw in a random battle, and I have about 4,000 played. So if there are two teams composed of equal numbers, and there's always one winning and one losing team, the average should be exactly 50%. Even if there's a draw every - say - 5,000 battles, that would still mean an average winrate of 49.9999%. In any case, the winrate is always gonna be exactly mirror the loserate.
@@pocketdynamo5787 No you are incorrect because in order for the average to be exactly 50% it would require every single person to have played the same amount of battles. One win/loss affects the overall WR more if you have fewer games and vice versa. Theres also a lot of accounts with very few battles that affects the global WR a lot. That is why the average server wide WR can be pretty much anything. For example in Overwatch its 56%. In LoL its 46% and in WoWs its 47 or 48.
you've got that entirely wrong. Anything that spots you, feels like forever in a DD LOL Although, the Atlanta really did need some change, I don't think it needed the nerf mallet whack-a-mole'd all over her.
Anyone else just love to sit back on a recliner, coffee or tea in one hand, phone in the other, in front of a fire on a cold winters night watching Jingles.
The matchmaker doesn't take into a count the type of consumables the ship has, it only takes into a count the type of ship it is and its tier. Yes, you can have all light cruisers in one side, and all heavy cruisers in the other
"There are no great men; there are only great challenges, which ordinary men like you and me are forced by circumstances to meet.” FADM Halsey GG Lightoller
That's all well and good - but the world is divided between those ordinary men who met the circumstances and persevered and those who faltered - or as the saying goes: _Luck is when preparation meets opportunity_
I guess it is the replays selection to go with the trademark commentary and the trademark laughter, I don't know, but I really enjoy these clips. Keep it up jingles.
I never realized just how blisteringly fast the ostergotland torps are in comparison to anything else. Every time before this in replays it has always been from its perspective but side-on those might as well be supersonic in comparison to regular torps.
Re: Dividing the radars evenly between teams: Radars are not the only thing to balance on. You want to make sure both teams have the same numbers of each type of ship. You might also want to balance on the quality of the ships so that one team doesn't get all the OP-for-their-tier ones while the other gets all the crap ones. You might even want to balance on the quality of the players, rating them by win %age or experience and then dividing that up fairly. Now, I don't actually know how the WoWS matchmaker works, so this is just a guess, but I suspect it works on some sort of points system. Having more radars gives your team points. So does having more CVs, more DDs, better ships, more experienced players, etc.. Then the matchmaker tries to keep the points even between the two teams. So maybe the reason Lightoller's team were having so much more success than the enemy was because the enemy got the radar advantage and the matchmaker compensated by giving Lightoller's team all the people who weren't shit?
I love how you praise the Graff Zepelin for going for the last cap at the end, so naturally, he steams full-on towards the edge of it and then turns around. :-D
I have 3 different premium cammo patterns for the Bismark (including the one you're referring to in this video) and got them all for free by completing missions, so you're welcome to test my skills with that ship anytime you want mighty gnome.
Atlanta desperately needs some buffs to reverse the powercreep. At the very least, Wargaming needs to long-range AA not suck, so that Atlanta can actually be an AA ship again. Though that would just be a starting point. The fact that Atlanta has thinner hull plating than same-tier *destroyers* has always been silly, and reload of the main guns also ought to be buffed. Especially since the IFHE nerf has reduced their direct damage potential so much already, at least letting them hit more often would be good compensation.
Consoles Atlanta is still good, and we have a variant called the Flint, which has a smokescreen, good range torpedoes, it loses the side turrets but having a smokescreen really offsets that, basically a cruiser sized destroyer....
Clearly one kill was consumed from the player's credit, as a sacrifice to the gods needed to create the absolute masterpiece that is that post battle results screen.
Be interesting to know just how well our hero's "Graf Zeppelin" compatriot really did. That not going into the cap towards the end seems dumb but that player was smart enough to use the WASD hack.
he was on relatively low health when he came into view of the Jean Bart near the end, so my guess is the GZ aborted his move into the cap to stay out of the Missouri's field of fire
10:00 Well Jingles, i had a game where there were 4 radar ships on the enemy team and none on mine. 3 were cruisers and one was a Mo. I was in a DD and i had a bad day.
Dear Admiral Jingles I have just watched the video that Rita put up about her move to England you sir strike me as Being a very kind and generous person well done and keep safe.
I have just started to watch this video, but the name "Lightoller" (like the the second officer of RMS Titanic) may be a hint that he might sink his ship in a spectacularly stupid way ;-D
Jean Bart - very, VERY fun ship to play. Highly recommend. Grab one if they become available again. Easily in my personal top five. 2nd highest in both average dmg n average xp earned among all T9 BBs.
Jingels, as a IT "specialist" for over a decade I can tell you that maths, logical thinking or common sense eroded from computer programming ( in corporations ) around 2013. Log story short: more and more projects look like six months long lemming train, where co-workers are pissed at You for nor rushing "B". Great replay, superb commentary, keep up the great work You do.
Hey Jingles, how come we don't see any replays of you these days? How about once a week we get one, where you dissect your own gameplay, tell us mistakes you made etc. Will be new content and you'll get better.
Past Jingles - Used to play a loud "Release the Kraken" clip everytime a kraken was achieved Now Jingles - Notices a Kraken after a 6th kill is achieved Future Jingles - Doesn't notice the Kraken till the end screen Ahh Jingles, never change :D
Lmao! I've been away for a couple of years and you popped into my mind today. I see that nothing has changed. 🤣 It's cool that you and Rita are still together.
I don’t play the game, enjoy watching these reviews, and watching players play well and bad. I will say that is probably 1 of the nicest looking ships I have seen on all the review videos
> "I can't help but think there's a better way of dividing the radar up.... Two ships with radar, two teams. Two divided by two, that's one ship with radar per team. Or maybe the maths is just too complicated." This is actually a really easy mistake to make, so I don't blame Jingles for getting this one wrong; a lot of people would, if they haven't studied Game Theory. But the way it works out is more like this: Two ships with radar, two teams. Two times two is four, so there are four hypothetical radar-ship-team binomials that we will need to distribute. But there are only two teams; this means we will need to carry the two _over_ from the other column, which gives us 22 teams, divided by four radar-ship-team binomials each, or in other words five radar ships per team with a remainder fraction of two. This remainder can't be evenly divided, so we will repeat the process again (carrying the four over from the previous column once again) which means we put four radar-ship-team binomials into the 42 teams we have and this gives us a nice even ten and a half. This means that, added to the previous column, we should have fifteen and a half radar ships for each team. You might argue that this answer is incorrect because there are only twelve ships on each side of the battle at a maximum, but this is failing to account for _imaginary_ ships, which is the mistake most people make.
Another incredible carry by the enemy team!! It seems there are two types of Jingles replay-videos. 1) Showing great results by skill! 2) Showing great results by lack of skill in the enemy team!
Actually Jingles, 10:17 the math works this way: 2 radar and 2 teams, 2 divided by 2 is 1, meaning that you should put them both in 1 team. Check the math, it clearly says 1, so there is no other way to put them.
I need a new computer to run this game but I spent my Computer Dough on an irresistible deal for another R/C Airplane... oh well! This Game looks super cool and I "really enjoy" your obviously very educated/strategic narrations. I'm still lost in this game and aren't seeing all that you narrate but I wanted to say: Thank You so much for "Your Allied Service" and for your explanation of game play! Impressed and Entertained! Robert
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
The battle results screen was a masterpiece. I'm sure Rita's going to put that on the fridge XD
At this point noone will send in a result screen just to see jingles art department to flex on us
I just wished he could have drawn the medals too.....
@@kevanjulseth5600 he needs to have room for improvement otherwise it will get stale
It's better than anything I've seen in a modern art gallery, put it on the fridge and you easily double the value of your fridge.
This Battle Results Screen is definately a work of art.
Even in elementary school u rarely see such lvl of skill !
Wargaming should make that the end results screen starting now
Wargaming can't afford to pay the license fees for using such a remarkable piece of art as a battle result screen. Especially if the piece was painted by the man the myth the evil gnome overlord and master of the saltmines the mighty jingles himself!
I'm writing to the moma next to get it diaplayed there!
I forgot to mention that he is a huge benefactor of mine because he gave me an extra slice of bread for this positive Review of his Art!
Made by the artist formerly known as Jingles.
However it still said 8 kills
Akazuki does wonderful work for a cat of her age.
Hey Jingles, Lightoller here. Thank you very much for this commentary and this beautiful masterpiece. I was asking myself the same question, why the fuck am I still alive? I certainly did a few mistakes in this game, but it was deffo fun to play. Oh and by the way I am a Belgian in a french The Glorious Bastards clan.
PS. For those who have guessed it, Lightoller comes from the inspiring story of Charles Herbert Lightoller who first served on the Titanic and later on saved lives during the Dynamo operation in WW2 from Dunkerque.
Thank you for the awesome game. If you get anymore games like this I hope Jingles puts them up. ☺
@@WarriorRed101 hopefully, he always do!
And if I remember my French correctly, the last word is spelled Bâtards, which is a short variant of the baguette.
So if Jingles had known his French, he would have had so much fun with that.
Actually Jingles, he killed 9 ships.
Yeah, ok, I head back to the saltmines, no need to use that shotgun....
And to think, he did all that complex math about splitting radar ships earlier!
"Need's got nothing to do with it." *racks shotgun*
@@ryanbrochu3336 he used all his neurones there!
he also didn't count the four shell hits that got that ninth kill :)
It wouldn't be a Jingles video unless he screwed something up.......
Jingles, sorry to say, he got 9 kills, not 8!
... And off to the salt mines we go ;)
Love that the intro still has the title card from the video in which jingles first used it
I think it fits perfectly
It’s great and I don’t want it to change
Btw my comment wasn't criticism but merely an observation
The radar maths is 2 divided 2 = 1, therefore both radars should be on 1 team simple wargaming maths
Somehow this makes sense...
Wait until you see their math on how they figure out profit.
@@timothyhouse1622 let me guess, release OP premium for $$$=Stonks!
Ugh idk what you whiners are struggling with.
According to the spreadsheet algorithm splitting up 2 radars negatively impacts their "destroyer sinky fun time" rating by 12%.
Simple math.
true, so many people fail to understand the WG MM : there's the minus 2 rule, so having two tier 7 DD face two tier 8 DD is ok because of the minus two rule. 16 minus two = 14 so it's balanced. Another simple algorithm is the GFY algorithm. This allows the MM to throw a stock tier 8 in 8 tier 10 battles. Again, simple because tier 8 minus 8 battles = 0 therefore balanced in the GFY algorithm.
The Scharnhorst was still celebrating having finally sunk something with its torpedoes.
Jingles: "...he certainly isn't a bad player,"
Lightoller: *warm and fuzzy feeling*
Jingles: "...he's about average..."
Lightoller: "...only about?"
Well, 50% winrate is right at average. Unlike in World of Tanks (where 49% WR is average), draws are nearly impossible in World of Warships and thus 50% would be the average.
Touche lol
@@RedXlV Average WR in warships is closer to 48% on EU. Draws doesnt matter
@@admiralfloofz658 I have never had a draw in a random battle, and I have about 4,000 played. So if there are two teams composed of equal numbers, and there's always one winning and one losing team, the average should be exactly 50%. Even if there's a draw every - say - 5,000 battles, that would still mean an average winrate of 49.9999%. In any case, the winrate is always gonna be exactly mirror the loserate.
@@pocketdynamo5787 No you are incorrect because in order for the average to be exactly 50% it would require every single person to have played the same amount of battles. One win/loss affects the overall WR more if you have fewer games and vice versa.
Theres also a lot of accounts with very few battles that affects the global WR a lot.
That is why the average server wide WR can be pretty much anything. For example in Overwatch its 56%. In LoL its 46% and in WoWs its 47 or 48.
Let me tell you, people not sending in screenshots along with their replays is becoming a meme! :P
I wonder if people will start sending their own fanart of said screenshot
@@destroyerinazuma96 That's actually quite the idea... ^^
@@destroyerinazuma96 insert art of them mining in salt mine
@@destroyerinazuma96 Now we can't go doing that. Too much risk one of them would actually be good, and inadvertently kill the meme.
@@CurtDegree good point, in hindsights
Atlanta's radar lasts forever when you're the DD being spotted...
The Atlanta is still great on console lol
Atlanta, altough objectively bad, is still as joy ^^
Atleast for me :D
I believe the atlanta is perfectly capable of making destroyer captains feel distinctly unwelcome. :)
I simply treat the Atlanta like a big destroyer with enough guns to delete other destroyers. Not so good tho when she gets uptiered to t9 tho....
you've got that entirely wrong.
Anything that spots you, feels like forever in a DD LOL
Although, the Atlanta really did need some change, I don't think it needed the nerf mallet whack-a-mole'd all over her.
Anyone else just love to sit back on a recliner, coffee or tea in one hand, phone in the other, in front of a fire on a cold winters night watching Jingles.
EconomicsMate can’t it’s summer and the AC is broken
Winter. Ehh riigghhtt
@@eddnovirus234 rip. Well its winter here in Aus. Freezing me ass off
Lucky you, living down in the prison colony at this time of the year
I hate the sun
EconomicsMate but you know this is a Jingles video and he lives in the UK right. We don’t have winter here In July
*Reads description*
Wait, Jingles...is that...are you...you've gone there again haven't you?
Battle Results Screen: "Jingles, draw me like one of your French girls."
I wish there was a mod for actually having such a battlescreen result.
I had the same thought when I saw that.
Someone is working on it, I'm sure.
Laird Cummings too bad it isn’t Wargaming. How hard is it to include a simple summary report as part of a recorded game?
@@scottdrone-silvers5179 apparently harder than they can handle.
The matchmaker doesn't take into a count the type of consumables the ship has, it only takes into a count the type of ship it is and its tier.
Yes, you can have all light cruisers in one side, and all heavy cruisers in the other
Love how the Nagato shows his ankle too much. And Jingles he had 9 kills.LOL
"There are no great men; there are only great challenges, which ordinary men like you and me are forced by circumstances to meet.” FADM Halsey GG Lightoller
That's all well and good - but the world is divided between those ordinary men who met the circumstances and persevered and those who faltered - or as the saying goes: _Luck is when preparation meets opportunity_
I love the Jingles battle results screens! They all have the personal touch.
I guess it is the replays selection to go with the trademark commentary and the trademark laughter, I don't know, but I really enjoy these clips. Keep it up jingles.
19:41, YES! THIS IS A THING NOW JINGLES! You cant take it back.
Jingles, Really wish we could see more of your own replays. Love your sense of humor and self deprecation.. and general incompetence.
I never realized just how blisteringly fast the ostergotland torps are in comparison to anything else. Every time before this in replays it has always been from its perspective but side-on those might as well be supersonic in comparison to regular torps.
Re: Dividing the radars evenly between teams: Radars are not the only thing to balance on. You want to make sure both teams have the same numbers of each type of ship. You might also want to balance on the quality of the ships so that one team doesn't get all the OP-for-their-tier ones while the other gets all the crap ones. You might even want to balance on the quality of the players, rating them by win %age or experience and then dividing that up fairly.
Now, I don't actually know how the WoWS matchmaker works, so this is just a guess, but I suspect it works on some sort of points system. Having more radars gives your team points. So does having more CVs, more DDs, better ships, more experienced players, etc.. Then the matchmaker tries to keep the points even between the two teams. So maybe the reason Lightoller's team were having so much more success than the enemy was because the enemy got the radar advantage and the matchmaker compensated by giving Lightoller's team all the people who weren't shit?
And, of course, the stricter your team compositions are the longer your queues are.
The battle results screen is a work of great artistry. Funny too!! Thank you Jingles!!
@Jingles I reckon Wargaming will be in touch shortly regarding a freelance opportunity to redo their post battle screens ;)
I love how you praise the Graff Zepelin for going for the last cap at the end, so naturally, he steams full-on towards the edge of it and then turns around. :-D
I think that the Ostergotland should have recieved some credit as well for thinning enemy hitpoints, but great job from Light ;)
I have 3 different premium cammo patterns for the Bismark (including the one you're referring to in this video) and got them all for free by completing missions, so you're welcome to test my skills with that ship anytime you want mighty gnome.
Need more battle result screens like this
"On your knees peasants , you are in the presents of greatness" LMFAO oh that was amazing that drawing xD
Jingles: that CV should really go for the Ostergotland.
Me: *snickers in Auxiliary Armament Mod 2*
Jingles, mate, if you keep putting up masterpieces like that, no one will ever send you a results screen again, since yours are clearly superior. ;)
I miss the old days of the Atlanta being fun to play...it just is used as a 1 win crew trainer now
Atlanta desperately needs some buffs to reverse the powercreep.
At the very least, Wargaming needs to long-range AA not suck, so that Atlanta can actually be an AA ship again. Though that would just be a starting point. The fact that Atlanta has thinner hull plating than same-tier *destroyers* has always been silly, and reload of the main guns also ought to be buffed. Especially since the IFHE nerf has reduced their direct damage potential so much already, at least letting them hit more often would be good compensation.
@@RedXlV lol "AA ship"
Consoles Atlanta is still good, and we have a variant called the Flint, which has a smokescreen, good range torpedoes, it loses the side turrets but having a smokescreen really offsets that, basically a cruiser sized destroyer....
Clearly one kill was consumed from the player's credit, as a sacrifice to the gods needed to create the absolute masterpiece that is that post battle results screen.
19:34 WG should adopt this results screen design
19:40 "And on that bombshell..." Ah I see you are a man of culture.
Lightoller? 2nd officer on RMS Titanic and hero of the Dunkirk evacuation?
Your first translation thought was actually right. It is translated as "The Glorious Bastards"
No longer play wot or wows but its always a treat watching jingles do a commentary over a wows replay
Be interesting to know just how well our hero's "Graf Zeppelin" compatriot really did. That not going into the cap towards the end seems dumb but that player was smart enough to use the WASD hack.
he was on relatively low health when he came into view of the Jean Bart near the end, so my guess is the GZ aborted his move into the cap to stay out of the Missouri's field of fire
That Battle results screen would get a gold star and big smiley face from my old infant school teacher. 😊⭐
I believe that was actually 9 kills admiral.
Ok Jingles. Which YT employee did you piss off this time... I see ads! That can't be right?!?
@@Shoikan No ads for me
Szabolcs Süli Odd. I got one near the end of the video, right after the enemy Bismarck went down.
(And sorry for putting this in this thread.. big fat finger syndrome, should have been a separate thread)
Shoikan Only Mingles with Jingles is ad-free.
thanks for the commentary and content jingles. much appreciated sir.
Jingles, you are really good with pronouncing those Swedish named ships. :) Nice to hear.
I remember him from a game some time ago, he's a nice guy and I think I have him on my friends list. /Klinkerhoffen
Add me buddy! Lightoller_ here :)
Jingles, the artwork there at the end is impeccable!
10:00 Well Jingles, i had a game where there were 4 radar ships on the enemy team and none on mine. 3 were cruisers and one was a Mo. I was in a DD and i had a bad day.
Arguably the best part of Jingles videos is his improvised Battle Results screens.
Lightoller... The senior surviving officer of the Titanic disaster.
I wonder if Lightoller took his name in World of Warships from the Titanic´s Second Officer whose name was Charles Lightoller (1874 - 1952).
Yes absolutely, he did :)
Dear Admiral Jingles I have just watched the video that Rita put up about her move to England you sir strike me as
Being a very kind and generous person well done and keep safe.
Thanks Jingles. Always something to look forward to in your videos.
THAT RESULTS SCREEN IS A WORK OF ART
Admiral, that has to be the greatest piece of art ever. Truly. I think even the French would appreciate it 😁.
Actually jingles, he got nine kills..... running away as I heard a gun cocking sound
I love these Jingles made results screens. We are in the midst of a master Artist
I have just started to watch this video, but the name "Lightoller" (like the the second officer of RMS Titanic) may be a hint that he might sink his ship in a spectacularly stupid way ;-D
Iceberg right ahead!!!!!
That's the intention!
Jean Bart - very, VERY fun ship to play. Highly recommend. Grab one if they become available again. Easily in my personal top five. 2nd highest in both average dmg n average xp earned among all T9 BBs.
"Sadly there wernt any results with the battle replay so I made one up" for crying out Jingles XD
Fantastic commentary!!!
As always.
Gotta catch em all!
Looool fan-bloody-tastic!
Jingels, as a IT "specialist" for over a decade I can tell you that maths, logical thinking or common sense eroded from computer programming ( in corporations ) around 2013. Log story short: more and more projects look like six months long lemming train, where co-workers are pissed at You for nor rushing "B". Great replay, superb commentary, keep up the great work You do.
man, jingles nailing the pronounciation of Östergötland. Kudos!
Yes, Old Man.
I had a great time watching this and was laughing the entire last section.
that was a jolly good battle.!
I do like the pokemon reference, my dear admiral!
It was also a very funny use of it 😄
I didn't know Jingles was still in kindergarten with that drawing
The battle result screen was worth the price of admission.
Hey Jingles, how come we don't see any replays of you these days?
How about once a week we get one, where you dissect your own gameplay, tell us mistakes you made etc. Will be new content and you'll get better.
Because his Bismarck has the yellow turret camo. ;)
@@ringowunderlich2241 touché
I don't think he plays these games much any more.
@@davidmoore1253 i've seen him yesterday in an operation battle sailing the warspite
Also, shout out to that Brindisi captain who made that Scharnhorst's week by self-sacrificing his ship to a german BB's torpedoes, what a gentleman
I love the end result screen! even if you discounted the number of kills. the Ostergötland also had a great game.
The battle result screen was amazing!!!!!
Thank you for keeping me entertained at 2 in the morning
1:13 I think they misspelled it as a tribute or reference to the title of Tarantino's film, which is also misspelled on purpose.
The results screen was brilliant!
Ah Jingles, Lightoller did what his namesake on the Titanic did - he survived and succeeded.
When you're so early the indicated comments number and actual comment count don't match
19:38 😂😂😂 Still say we need a mod to 'improve' our results screen with our overlord Jingles fine artwork.
Well WG result screen at least has number of kills right xD
Everybody get out your rubber ducky the bath tub BB is in the house nice drawing Picasso lol. Thanks Jingles
Past Jingles - Used to play a loud "Release the Kraken" clip everytime a kraken was achieved
Now Jingles - Notices a Kraken after a 6th kill is achieved
Future Jingles - Doesn't notice the Kraken till the end screen
Ahh Jingles, never change :D
Lmao!
I've been away for a couple of years and you popped into my mind today. I see that nothing has changed. 🤣
It's cool that you and Rita are still together.
I have a tremendous appreciation for the Jingles-Screen. The... screengle, if you will.
I don’t play the game, enjoy watching these reviews, and watching players play well and bad. I will say that is probably 1 of the nicest looking ships I have seen on all the review videos
Loving the battle result screens
18:13 Who else was screaming "T"!!! HIT "T"!!! HEAL!!! HIT "T"!!!
I don't even play world of warships but I enjoy jingles commentary quite a bit.
Jingles almost dies.
"We need to kill him"
"NOW"
> "I can't help but think there's a better way of dividing the radar up.... Two ships with radar, two teams. Two divided by two, that's one ship with radar per team. Or maybe the maths is just too complicated."
This is actually a really easy mistake to make, so I don't blame Jingles for getting this one wrong; a lot of people would, if they haven't studied Game Theory. But the way it works out is more like this:
Two ships with radar, two teams. Two times two is four, so there are four hypothetical radar-ship-team binomials that we will need to distribute. But there are only two teams; this means we will need to carry the two _over_ from the other column, which gives us 22 teams, divided by four radar-ship-team binomials each, or in other words five radar ships per team with a remainder fraction of two. This remainder can't be evenly divided, so we will repeat the process again (carrying the four over from the previous column once again) which means we put four radar-ship-team binomials into the 42 teams we have and this gives us a nice even ten and a half. This means that, added to the previous column, we should have fifteen and a half radar ships for each team.
You might argue that this answer is incorrect because there are only twelve ships on each side of the battle at a maximum, but this is failing to account for _imaginary_ ships, which is the mistake most people make.
ok i got to admit, that is a cute drawing there son. love it.
I feel so sorry for that Brindisi, Battleships left and front, cruiser passing ahead and 5 sets of torpedoes
Another incredible carry by the enemy team!! It seems there are two types of Jingles replay-videos. 1) Showing great results by skill! 2) Showing great results by lack of skill in the enemy team!
Actually Jingles, 10:17 the math works this way: 2 radar and 2 teams, 2 divided by 2 is 1, meaning that you should put them both in 1 team. Check the math, it clearly says 1, so there is no other way to put them.
Thats a nice result screen Jingles :D
And I love that post battle results screen
19:39 this needs to be in a museum.
15:30. This guy is holding his fire so he can kill confirm. sneaky bastard
Perhaps the two radar for one team and none for the other reflects the real life naval axiom 'never fight fair'.
I do enjoy those Jingles result screens. Almost think it would be a good idea for Wargaming to make than an option in the UI.
I need a new computer to run this game but I spent my Computer Dough on an irresistible deal for another R/C Airplane... oh well!
This Game looks super cool and I "really enjoy" your obviously very educated/strategic narrations.
I'm still lost in this game and aren't seeing all that you narrate but I wanted to say:
Thank You so much for "Your Allied Service" and for your explanation of game play!
Impressed and Entertained!
Robert
I love the new results screen
Replays commented by Rear Admiral are always amusing to watch, thanks Jingles!