Planets with the ZWO ASI224MC

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 31

  • @petelopez5826
    @petelopez5826 6 месяцев назад +3

    Can you do deep sky objects with this camera.

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  6 месяцев назад +1

      Hi! The sensor is very small for DSOs, but it is possible if you use a small refractor like the Askar FMA135. Thanks for watching and for your support!

  • @GarnettLeary
    @GarnettLeary Год назад +2

    Beautiful

  • @Umairhyder-l4q
    @Umairhyder-l4q 7 месяцев назад +1

    Hello! I own a SkyWatcher 10" Dobsonian FlexTube with manual tracking and I'm considering purchasing either the ZWO ASI 178MC or ASI 224MC for planetary and lunar imaging. Do you think the ASI 178MC is a good choice, or should I opt for the ASI 224MC?

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  7 месяцев назад +2

      Hi! I did use the 178MC and the results were worst than the 224MC. With manual tracking a faster FPS and is better. At 1200mm focal lenght using a 2x or 3x barlow you will need a larger pixel size to be able to deal with the F15 focal ratio, what makes the scope very slow. For lunar the 678MC is the best camera I ever used. Unfortunatelly there is no one do it all camera using a dobsonian. If I had to pick only one, I will pick the 224MC. Hope I could help you! Thanks for watching and for your support! Clear skies!

  • @andysPARK
    @andysPARK Год назад +1

    Hi, thanks for the video and builds specs.
    I wonder, could you do a comparison between is camera and the svbony that you have? If its convenient sometime.

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +1

      Hi! The planet season is coming and I will do some nice comparisons between many cameras and scopes soon. My video schedule is a little late due to illness and the channel's studio building delays. Thanks for watching and for your support!

  • @diegoitanoobb8116
    @diegoitanoobb8116 Год назад +1

    Per curiosità: quanto era lungo il video di giove chr hai processato?

    • @diegoitanoobb8116
      @diegoitanoobb8116 Год назад

      E anche quello di saturno per favore😊

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад

      Hi. I used short vídeos captured during a 3 minute interval for Jupiter and 6 minute for Saturn. Thanks for watching and for your support!

    • @diegoitanoobb8116
      @diegoitanoobb8116 Год назад

      ​@@AstronoMinasthanks 💖

  • @johnb3616
    @johnb3616 Год назад

    Great images! So i have a meade etx 125 and a william optics Z61 and i purchased the 224 as my first camera besides my nikon D5600 will the meade etx 125 do fairly well with the 224 as well as my WO Z61?

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад

      Hi. The 224MC is a great planetary camera and can be used even with very slow systems, bellow f20. I guess you will find great results! Thank you for the support!

  • @thegdplayer
    @thegdplayer Год назад

    Hi! Could you please tell me what telescope are you using?

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +1

      Hi! It's a SkyWatcher Flextube 8 inch dobsonian. Thanks for watching!

    • @thegdplayer
      @thegdplayer Год назад

      @@AstronoMinas oo cool, I use the same telescope!

  • @LeeeB0
    @LeeeB0 Год назад

    Hi, i have a 10" Skywatcher flextube. Would you recommend the 224mc for that also? or is there another camera that is a little more expensive but much better for planets?
    thank you

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +1

      Hi, I have the 10" too, the 224MC is petfect for it. If yours is the non Goto model like mine you will need the faster camera available. The 224MC is the fastest followed by the 462MC. Thanks for your support!

    • @LeeeB0
      @LeeeB0 Год назад

      @@AstronoMinas hi, mine actually is a goto, so you think the 462 would be better?.. I was also looking at the 585mc

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +1

      So the max FPS won't be a problem. The 462MC and 662MC will do a good job. The 585MC is more expensive with the same pixel size than 462MC and 662MC. The ROI for planetary image is so small. It seems an overkill only for planetary image but you can use it as a DSO camera too.

  • @40NaSombra
    @40NaSombra Год назад

    Já fez DSO com ela ? Da ter um bom resultado ?

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +1

      Olá! O sensor é muito pequeno para um bom enquadramento e o sensor esquenta bastante, provavelmente o ruído seria bem proeminente. Muito obrigado pelo apoio!

    • @40NaSombra
      @40NaSombra Год назад

      @@AstronoMinas uma dslr de sai melhor né ? Tu conhece uma asi178? Tu acha que uma dslr se daí melhor que ela ainda para dso ?

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад

      Depende do objeto, do telescópio ou lente. A 178MC é mais indicada para lunar e solar.

    • @40NaSombra
      @40NaSombra Год назад +1

      @@AstronoMinas digo pra fazer DSO em um tele d200f1200.

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад

      O sensor é pequeno demais e não tem full-well capacity pra lidar com DSO. É possível, mas os resultados não serão bons.

  • @JoaoDias-gi1um
    @JoaoDias-gi1um Год назад +1

    Excelente. Eu tenho a asi 120. Veja lá no meu canal JOAO DIAS JUPITER. Agente agradece a visita.

    • @AstronoMinas
      @AstronoMinas  Год назад +2

      Olá João! Sim, é uma câmera excelente, vai bem com todo tipo de telescópio. Vou acessar! Muito obrigado pelo apoio!