Finally, a STRV122B+ video in english! For some reason, no one has posted about this tank, there were only 2 other videos, and they were in french, and Russian. And now I must know, how much beefier does it feel than the other strv122s?
@@fuahrahnThe snowy Ardennes battle in this clip is impossible for the other STRVs to survive. The composite on the side of the b+ turret is incredibly effective. I survive M829A2, A1, KE-W, 2x DM53 to the side of the turret. Insane.
The camo is based of the camo hägglunds use for the prototypes of the newest cv90 generation. Hägglunds probably owns the pattern so dont know how easy it would be to get on the market
@@filblo503 seems like you were could be right, as the B+ in the trophy got a desert-ish version of the same pattern that the PLSS got on the marketplace recently. I read your comment before the trophy came out, and hoped this would not be an issue, as the CV90120 has its proto camo from BAE on the market, which seems like a similar use case. Hey ho. Either that or they just preferred it of course ;-)
I hope they add that camouflage in the gaijin market, and btw good video! It's always good to see how others play Sweden. A nation that increasingly marks more territory in the game.
Play it while it lasts. I got 4 more nukes in the standard 122b grinding xp to unlock this one. I'll probably put out another video on that as I don't want to just toss the footage.
@lequexx5088 the Abrams definitely have spall liners my guy I work with tankers and around the Abrams and have been inside them spall liners is pretty much a basic requirement for modern tanks too
@@Bmoney98 yeah, I'm in no position to really say anything about it, since I have no expertise. I just noticed that there was a lot discussed about the Abrams in the forums and it was very controversial. Even if I go with the people stating that there is a kevlar liner or smth integrated in the armor, I doubt anything will change, because the Abrams armor is still classified or there are no primary sources.
not sure why are people so fixated to 122 b+ having marginally better armor. Trust me, whoever can pen 2a7v can also pen 122b+ on same spot. This guy is good player, and he would do similarly good even in sepv2. Me personally would always go for better thermals then for few mm of additional armor.
@@kenanmuhic8755 "Few milimeters of additional armor" It makes more difference than you think. UFP on the 122B+ is hit or miss, while on 2A7 it's a guaranteed pen w/3BM60. (2A7 can also be penetrated frontally, where the additional armour is, by DM53. But only Finnish 2A6 and Challenger 3 have that shell, so...) Not to mention, 122B+ is all around immune to autocannons, and is also lighter. Arguably, has a better shell as well. Gunner thermals mean jackshit since you still get the Gen 2 CITV. And if you are so fond of good resolution thermals/optics, CV90120 exists.
Took me 12 side shots on PSO to kill it with HSTV-L. Spall liners and Composite really strong. Please Gaijin give nations other than Russia and Germany some MTB survivability. This also proves we need 2-4km maps in top tier to buff mobility and reduce spawn camping.
For me the HSTV-L seems to me a very poorly balanced vehicle, it is very difficult to do one shot with the dm53, the turret ring absorbs all the damage and sometimes the vehicle bounces the rounds without reason, for me that they make a rebalance. But at the same time I find it ridiculous that the abrams is probably the easiest tank to kill of all top tier, its armor is so bad that practically a shot anywhere leaves the tank incapacitated and vulnerable to destroy it. Gaijin has made the USA an unfun nation to play as well as to fight.
Well, you could fix that with more realism, but you would not like it. Irl, a penetrating hit of any kind, even if spall does not evicerate the crew =a combat kill. So you could fix it by having your crew's performance be modified by their health and then drastically decrease crew health or increase what damages them. Now you got HE non pen hits that turn your entire crew orange, you got a 10 sec stun while crew try to sort their shit out, load times are increased, repair times increased etc. A penetrating hit that hits the drive train but nothing else now puts your gunner and loader in red health etc etc. Idk if you want that either but it would make it more realistic while also "nerfing" spall liners.
It's just not as good as the WZ1001 and Type 99. I like that it's in the lineup, but it's definitely underwhelming. It was also broken for the first few days of the patch.
Yeah you are right I played it for a while and the probably most important thing, mobility sucks + armor is not that good I cant sometimes bounce a single shot
The VT-4 is meant to be better or similar to it's predecessor (Type 99A) but yet having a similar design to the MBT 2000, has good APS which can block most apfsds at medium to long ranges and has the same reverse gear as the Type 99A which means it should be able to achieve atleast 30 km/h of reverse in the future of this update, along with gen 3 thermals I also heard it's reload will be faster at 6.7s vs 7.1s, and if it has mobility problems it will also be fixed since it should correspond to China's recent technology Also VT-4's armour isn't bad, it bounced a sabot on the side of the turret by a Leopard 2A7V, and the VT-4 survived a ricochet on the engine deck by the same tank while it gets nullified by the turret the second time
@@Cobalt-Opera The APS ignores kinetic munitions, the era on the turret is 4 blocks of FY5 vs ~20 overlapping on the Type 99 and WZ, and the power to weight is 24 hp/t vs 27.5 on the Type 99. Also half the reverse speed. It's just a worse tank unless they buff it at some point.
@@Wogby Yeah, but the stats should match based on what I said recently, also on the solo test I saw the VT-4 fired APS at the incoming tank rounds, I think this only can be done at long ranges due to reaction time, and because rounds have insane get-up speed...
@@lordcurre39 you realize the guns weight difference can be seen with the regular 2a6 and 2a5 and it isnt a lot, and the fact that the gearbox isnt modeled and the armor is worse, sooooooo if the weight is modeled why isnt the other stuff.
Hey wogby I have a question for you. Does apfsds spalling at top tier feel really inconsistent now? Ever since the update 1 shotting tanks in weak spots has felt really inconsistent, even on tanks w/o spall liners such as the abrams Im using the slpprj m/95 on the strv 122s if that changes anything
Yep, it feels like they've nerfed something somewhere. Vehicles with spall liners require an unreasonable surgical precision while vehicles without are having a slap fight.
Listen bro, I respect your skills, and you’re an extremely good player but the STRV 122B+ is a glitch Don’t try to convince me that a DM53 can’t go through the neck of this tank or even 3BM60, that add on armor is way way too good and over performing combine that with the OP spall liners, it’s just so stupid rn I tried the leopard 2s and T-80s against this tank, it’s so glitchy, I kill 2A7Vs with no issue from the neck and sides Remember when Russian tanks used to hold W, it’s the same now. Lastly, good gameplay.
Specifically the add-on armor above the front plate that covers the turret ring is by Gaijin's own sources 600mm resistant to KE penetrators according to the Swedish trials. It's less than that in game, so that aspect is under performing on both the Strv 122s and the Leopard 2A6 & 7. In real life, 3BM-60 wouldn't be able to penetrate the Leopard or Abrams Sep V3 frontally. From a gameplay perspective, there's nothing "glitchy" about any of these vehicles, they all work as intended. Whether or not the way that they function is to your liking is another story.
You are playing with broken glitch tank which is disgusting.. there are no skills with this tank and if you played same games using 2A6/7 you wouldn't survive those hits..
@Wogby you should understand before you reply. I didn't say you are bad player, I said you wouldn't survive those hits with other tanks.. this is mainly because Gaijin made this tank so glitch for reasons Gaijin only know..
![Leopard 2A7V - The Death of Top Tier [74 Kills + 5 Nukes, 6 Games]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/O2h0k8lQa5o/mqdefault.jpg)
![Leopard 2A7V - The Death of Top Tier [74 Kills + 5 Nukes, 6 Games]](/img/tr.png)
![Challenger 3 TD - Cavalry's Here, Lads! [50 Kills + Nuke, 5 Games]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pLCeqSUeQAU/mqdefault.jpg)
![STRV 122B+ - EZ [30 Kills + 3 Nukes]](/img/1.gif)
Finally, a STRV122B+ video in english! For some reason, no one has posted about this tank, there were only 2 other videos, and they were in french, and Russian. And now I must know, how much beefier does it feel than the other strv122s?
Feels slower, but the armor is absurd. Best tank in the game right now.
@@WogbyIs the armor a big difference compared to the other strv 122's?
@@Wogbyabsurd? Didn't noticed tbh, feeling pretty much the same with other 122.
@@fuahrahnThe snowy Ardennes battle in this clip is impossible for the other STRVs to survive. The composite on the side of the b+ turret is incredibly effective. I survive M829A2, A1, KE-W, 2x DM53 to the side of the turret. Insane.
Currently grinding swedish line and your video prove why , keep going amazing content
Thank you!
This camo should be in the marketplace, so good!
The camo is based of the camo hägglunds use for the prototypes of the newest cv90 generation.
Hägglunds probably owns the pattern so dont know how easy it would be to get on the market
@@filblo503 seems like you were could be right, as the B+ in the trophy got a desert-ish version of the same pattern that the PLSS got on the marketplace recently. I read your comment before the trophy came out, and hoped this would not be an issue, as the CV90120 has its proto camo from BAE on the market, which seems like a similar use case. Hey ho. Either that or they just preferred it of course ;-)
I hope they add that camouflage in the gaijin market, and btw good video! It's always good to see how others play Sweden. A nation that increasingly marks more territory in the game.
what the fuck are these goofy emojis 🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶🥶
Used your scope ever since I saw a 122B PLSS video from you. 10/10 would recommend
Thanks!
In terms of ground vehicles Sweden has the best top tier lineup imo.
Here before man gets popular! I hope this channel gets you success
“2nd one of the day” “it’s actually my sixth” 😂
In a faw days I will unlock my first 122 can’t wait
Play it while it lasts. I got 4 more nukes in the standard 122b grinding xp to unlock this one. I'll probably put out another video on that as I don't want to just toss the footage.
t-90m overpowered like this like that while strv122 series dominates rop tier since being added
love how they just said fuck the abrams lets be real though even if they gave it spall liners the neck would still be a major weakspot
I think they never had spall liners irl
@lequexx5088 the Abrams definitely have spall liners my guy I work with tankers and around the Abrams and have been inside them spall liners is pretty much a basic requirement for modern tanks too
@@Bmoney98 yeah, I'm in no position to really say anything about it, since I have no expertise. I just noticed that there was a lot discussed about the Abrams in the forums and it was very controversial. Even if I go with the people stating that there is a kevlar liner or smth integrated in the armor, I doubt anything will change, because the Abrams armor is still classified or there are no primary sources.
But I don’t really have anything against you US guys, so I wish for the best of luck for you.
And like sorry man. I shouldn’t have written anything to begin with as I’m just someone who plays the game for fun and doesn’t know shit about tanks.
It is sad to see that it has better armour than the Leopard 2A7V. I get always killed by the Stridsvagn 122 B+
To add insult to injury, it's also faster lol
not sure why are people so fixated to 122 b+ having marginally better armor. Trust me, whoever can pen 2a7v can also pen 122b+ on same spot. This guy is good player, and he would do similarly good even in sepv2. Me personally would always go for better thermals then for few mm of additional armor.
@@kenanmuhic8755not really. I Lose pretty much all the time against the 122B+ if I dont Hit the canon first
@@kenanmuhic8755u know nothing
@@kenanmuhic8755 "Few milimeters of additional armor" It makes more difference than you think. UFP on the 122B+ is hit or miss, while on 2A7 it's a guaranteed pen w/3BM60. (2A7 can also be penetrated frontally, where the additional armour is, by DM53. But only Finnish 2A6 and Challenger 3 have that shell, so...)
Not to mention, 122B+ is all around immune to autocannons, and is also lighter. Arguably, has a better shell as well. Gunner thermals mean jackshit since you still get the Gen 2 CITV. And if you are so fond of good resolution thermals/optics, CV90120 exists.
Took me 12 side shots on PSO to kill it with HSTV-L. Spall liners and Composite really strong. Please Gaijin give nations other than Russia and Germany some MTB survivability.
This also proves we need 2-4km maps in top tier to buff mobility and reduce spawn camping.
PSO has no spall liner on the hull
For me the HSTV-L seems to me a very poorly balanced vehicle, it is very difficult to do one shot with the dm53, the turret ring absorbs all the damage and sometimes the vehicle bounces the rounds without reason, for me that they make a rebalance.
But at the same time I find it ridiculous that the abrams is probably the easiest tank to kill of all top tier, its armor is so bad that practically a shot anywhere leaves the tank incapacitated and vulnerable to destroy it.
Gaijin has made the USA an unfun nation to play as well as to fight.
spawncamping should be illegal
At this point, I think it's a feature of their map design.
@@Wogby it is
video duration is very good.We watch it like watching a TV series.
The cute chubby leopard cousin :D it looks so neat and tidy i love it. Hoping Gaijin will add 2a7UH too
WE HAVE BECOME INVINCIBLE. 122s are absolutely absurd I love it
My man, finally.
Hi I’m just wondering what optic that is and if it’s universal because it looks really nice
Link in the description.
how do i make an all tanks file?
@@Wogby
ignore that i made one
@@Wogby
@@its-sneaky-b7295 hey, can you tell me how you did that? I wanna make it universal too, thanks!
Spawnraping like a pro,,,,
great gameplay!
Spall liners are honestly a terrible addition, im all for realism but shooting a tank in the side should be more than comander loader
Well, you could fix that with more realism, but you would not like it. Irl, a penetrating hit of any kind, even if spall does not evicerate the crew =a combat kill. So you could fix it by having your crew's performance be modified by their health and then drastically decrease crew health or increase what damages them.
Now you got HE non pen hits that turn your entire crew orange, you got a 10 sec stun while crew try to sort their shit out, load times are increased, repair times increased etc. A penetrating hit that hits the drive train but nothing else now puts your gunner and loader in red health etc etc. Idk if you want that either but it would make it more realistic while also "nerfing" spall liners.
Megamind tonk
Can we get a video of your graphics settings?
Which termals generation does Strv122B+ have?
1st gen, the 2a7 is third.
And the commander sights are?
@@e-5069 Third
Thanks
spawn sniping is the best....
the amount of skill issued americans is insane
imagine this game without jets and cheaters............................
Believe me, I do every single time I play.
Hi :) New video on Leclercs? They got a big buff on the turret rotation.
Yes, soon
In realistic mode, does any aircraft equipped with a nuke bomb have a visible sight from the third-person view ?
Lol those paid actors on the cap cuh 💀
I gotta ask, what is the decal on the rear left of the turret? Is it a creator one?
Yeah, it's BPA_Jon's decal. Here's the link:
store.gaijin.net/catalog.php?category=WarThunder&partner=BPA_Jon&partner_val=n6ylk6r4
leopard 2a7 video next?
T-90M Wednesday, 2A7V Friday
How about VT-4 no one is using it Idk why
It's just not as good as the WZ1001 and Type 99. I like that it's in the lineup, but it's definitely underwhelming. It was also broken for the first few days of the patch.
Yeah you are right I played it for a while and the probably most important thing, mobility sucks + armor is not that good I cant sometimes bounce a single shot
The VT-4 is meant to be better or similar to it's predecessor (Type 99A) but yet having a similar design to the MBT 2000, has good APS which can block most apfsds at medium to long ranges and has the same reverse gear as the Type 99A which means it should be able to achieve atleast 30 km/h of reverse in the future of this update, along with gen 3 thermals
I also heard it's reload will be faster at 6.7s vs 7.1s, and if it has mobility problems it will also be fixed since it should correspond to China's recent technology
Also VT-4's armour isn't bad, it bounced a sabot on the side of the turret by a Leopard 2A7V, and the VT-4 survived a ricochet on the engine deck by the same tank while it gets nullified by the turret the second time
@@Cobalt-Opera The APS ignores kinetic munitions, the era on the turret is 4 blocks of FY5 vs ~20 overlapping on the Type 99 and WZ, and the power to weight is 24 hp/t vs 27.5 on the Type 99. Also half the reverse speed. It's just a worse tank unless they buff it at some point.
@@Wogby Yeah, but the stats should match based on what I said recently, also on the solo test I saw the VT-4 fired APS at the incoming tank rounds, I think this only can be done at long ranges due to reaction time, and because rounds have insane get-up speed...
What's the difference between the regular strv 122 and this?
Is it not immediately obvious? The entire turret and front half of the chassis is surrounded by applique.
How does this thing weigh less than the 2a7v
lighter gun/breach since it the l44 and not 55, diffrent gearbox diffrent armor
@@lordcurre39 you realize the guns weight difference can be seen with the regular 2a6 and 2a5 and it isnt a lot, and the fact that the gearbox isnt modeled and the armor is worse, sooooooo if the weight is modeled why isnt the other stuff.
@@bagelmaster2498 the extra armor on the strv is made in Sweden with different materials then Germany something better can still be lighter
6 a.m.
Nice
Is the skin now available for live build ? I tried using it but it wouldn’t show in game
have been for quite a while now
Yes, it works. Link is in the description.
R the leclercs worth grinding with amx 30 super
No. Don't bother. I like them, they're neat tanks, but if you want to get something top tier that has staying power just grind Sweden.
Hey wogby I have a question for you. Does apfsds spalling at top tier feel really inconsistent now? Ever since the update 1 shotting tanks in weak spots has felt really inconsistent, even on tanks w/o spall liners such as the abrams
Im using the slpprj m/95 on the strv 122s if that changes anything
Yep, it feels like they've nerfed something somewhere. Vehicles with spall liners require an unreasonable surgical precision while vehicles without are having a slap fight.
Chonk tonk
It's always silent Russian tanks for me, bmp, BVM, etc. Poof they're 20 yards behind you, voila!!
The BVM turbine is substantially quieter than it would be IRL. It's been pretty noticeable since the most recent sound rework.
Listen bro, I respect your skills, and you’re an extremely good player but the STRV 122B+ is a glitch
Don’t try to convince me that a DM53 can’t go through the neck of this tank or even 3BM60, that add on armor is way way too good and over performing combine that with the OP spall liners, it’s just so stupid rn
I tried the leopard 2s and T-80s against this tank, it’s so glitchy, I kill 2A7Vs with no issue from the neck and sides
Remember when Russian tanks used to hold W, it’s the same now.
Lastly, good gameplay.
Specifically the add-on armor above the front plate that covers the turret ring is by Gaijin's own sources 600mm resistant to KE penetrators according to the Swedish trials. It's less than that in game, so that aspect is under performing on both the Strv 122s and the Leopard 2A6 & 7. In real life, 3BM-60 wouldn't be able to penetrate the Leopard or Abrams Sep V3 frontally. From a gameplay perspective, there's nothing "glitchy" about any of these vehicles, they all work as intended. Whether or not the way that they function is to your liking is another story.
@@Wogby an “opinion” and I respect it but don’t agree with.
You are playing with broken glitch tank which is disgusting.. there are no skills with this tank and if you played same games using 2A6/7 you wouldn't survive those hits..
My stats in the 2A7 are better you can just look it up. Nothing broken or glitchy about any of these vehicles, I'm just a better player.
@Wogby you should understand before you reply. I didn't say you are bad player, I said you wouldn't survive those hits with other tanks.. this is mainly because Gaijin made this tank so glitch for reasons Gaijin only know..