Should dangerous cyclists be banned from driving? Feat. Nick Freeman & Narinder Kaur | Jeremy Vine
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Last week the House of Commons backed an amendment to create three new offences for dangerous cyclists.
But now 'Mr Loophole' Nick Freeman wants to law to go even further.
He wants reckless cyclists to have their driving licences confiscated and to be subject to drink and drug testing.
Do you agree?
Jeremy Vine on 5 is on television every weekday at 9:15am until 1:30pm on Channel 5.
Subscribe to the channel for more celebrity interviews, hot topics and debates: bit.ly/34DvAv4
Twitter: / jeremyvineon5
Facebook: / jeremyvineon5
Instagram: / jeremyvineon5
#JeremyVine #cycling #dangerousdriving
Yes, Jeremy Vine should definitely be banned from the roads.
Netherlands here.😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 What? Maybe just get some cycling infrastructure! We got more bikes than people and we don't wear a helmet. We would never take somebody's drivers license. It's even always the drivers fault if you hit a cyclist in my country. Children of 7 years old bike to school alone.
Good cycling infrastructure should be the talking point. Nothing else.
We're in london bro. We actually have things to do a places to go.. we dont sit around smoking weed and doing nothing
@@kaikai-pb7fh Time for you then to leave your Island to see real cycling infrastructuur.
BTW. the GDP per capita of The Netherlands is around 20% greater than that of the UK.
Dude. Its always raining im england i dont want to ride a bike unless its for fun not commuting. Am i supoosed to pick up girlfriends on a bike?
7:28 Nick Freeman, said about road safety when he defends drunk drivers and speeding motorists and gets them off prosecution through a loop hole in the law and has become very wealthy doing so
There is bad motorists bad cyclist and bad pedestrians, totally bias
Absolutely well said
I was a minibus driver and passengers would often comment about the group of cyclists riding two,three or four abreast, I would point out that they're actually only riding two abreast, but you are mistaking the slightly staggered formation, because that's what you're looking for.
I witnesses cars and vans going through red lights constantly and generally just driving badly.
Any cyclist, who cycles on the pavement is dangerous. It is also illegal.
I cycle on the pavement sometimes because motorists drive so dangerously. I'm not a danger to anybody because I only do this when the pavement is free of pedestrians. The police pass me often when I'm cycling on the pavement, and although illegal, they use a bit of common sense. Much like it being illegal to fly a kite in public, I'm sure the police would be fine with that too.
@@cyclingSausage I have experienced cyclists on the pavement many times when there are pedestrians present. It is unfair to state motorists are dangerous, when the majority are not. The law is there to protect pedestrians for a reason. It is also lawful to keep your dog under control , especially in a park. But again that law is flaunted.
@@tommcmanamon8327 In my experience most motorists are dangerous. Most will overtake too closely not giving the required 5 feet to cyclists. There's a law to protect cyclists for a reason and very few motorists adhere to it. It's the reason why I cycle on pavements when I can.
@@cyclingSausage I have seen many cyclists go through red lights skipping from the road onto the pavement instead of waiting. Cyclists also sneak through stationary traffic at traffic lights. Motorists obey traffic regulations or they are booked. I agree there are some motorists maybe dangerous, however it is no justification to put pedestrians at risk, by travelling at speed without no consideration for them. That is why the law is there to protect pedestrians, especially the elderly and women with prams or toddlers.
@@tommcmanamon8327 I agree with you. There's a lot of dicks out there, no matter what transport they choose use.
Ive been driving for 20 years sometimes as a professional driver driving bon lorries driving for 40 hours a week around residential areas and have never been frustrated by a cyclist. Its the easiest thing to pass, there are lots of bad and angry drivers on the road but not many cyclists, only bad drivers get confused as how to pass a cyclist, and they out themselves In the comments
A cyclist crosses a red light and a car attempting to avoid the cyclist kills a pedestrian, what then, given that the cyclist was not caught?
Ever been to my country the Netherlands with more bikes than people? It's just across the Atlantic, maybe you've heard of it. 😂 No number plates and 7 year olds driving to school alone on a bike. Nobody wears a helmet too. It's all about bike infrastructure, nothing else. This isn't even a conversation in my country. Just suggesting you put a helmet on a bike would end your career on TV. We would say that you should make that road safer.
If that happens in my country the car driver or road infrastructure would get blamed in court. You should always be aware in a car and expect a cyclist, even with a green light. It could be a kid that is just learning to ride a bicycle. Just a helmet is a middle finger to somebody who likes his hair in good shape when he arrives and it's freedom to us. Nobody takes away our freedom. They would tax you too for owning a bicycle. We would start a revolution before that happens.
And nobody is going to enforce any new laws anyway.
Erm what about the cyclists that don’t have a driving licence?
Prison
Yes, cyclists need serious penalties too. They are a menace to pedestrians, especially the middle aged highly entitled types.👀
If a pedestrian steps out into the road without looking causing danger to an oncoming cyclists does the pedestrian get a driving ban
Part of the highway code deals with anticipating possible hazards. The highway code is for the adherence of ALL road users not just motorised vehicles. However there is now a pecking order of responsibility entailing accidents and top of that pecking order is pedestrians.
The same applies to a motorist hitting a cyclist even if that cyclist may have suddenly darted into the pathway of the motor vehicle, if there is a collision the motorist gets the blame.
Is it necessary to have adverts every 5 minutes 🤦 we're not in America
More motorists get of with a suspended sentence for killing when behind the wheel than are killed by cyclists every year.
Is the man in drag fooling anyone.
St. Jeremy of Vine claimed that he never rides his bike on the pavement. Yet not too many months ago he did a item about urban foxes. There he was riding on the pavement videoing the mess that they'd made. Hypocrite.
Jeremy "The Grass" Vine
Jeremy sounds absolutely ridiculous. His bias is blinding him and preventing him from chairing or having an honest debate
Mr Vine obviously doesn’t want more restrictions on cyclists because he is one
He's also friends of sad git cyclngmickey
@@gbhxu It's cycling Mikey, and he's great!
Two ignorant rude people and one polite man 😂
There was a polite man??
@@DVDfeverGames Kev from The Mirror
@@gbhxu He's not there, though.
Kev is not a man.. the middle panellist is more of a man than him.
@@kaikai-pb7fh Kev isn't there. What planet are you on?
Yes Vine and you are the first amongst them........your videos show you to be what appears to be a provocational cycling zealot.
I truly believe that Cyclists should have to have a permit to ride a bike after taking a test AND most importantly insurance so any damage they cause to cars. pedestrians etc is covered
But how can it be policed? Cyclists do not have a registration number plate to identify their personal details/ address
So seven year old little timmy won't be getting a bike for Christmas without a test and insurance and if he rides on a footpath he gets arrested
Damage to cars? 😂 How delusional can you be.
By doing that it will result in more cars on the road, which wouldn’t help anything
Vine should be banned from roads with his stupid camera then banned from TV and radio for being useless
This just proves Vine's general bias, which at least now is obvious.