When you put out videos, please check the audio level. It is difficult to hear what is been said. Anything preventing you from using a PA system when conducting such programs?
@@allenbrininstool7558 Neither Yeshua nor "apostles" had a "Septuagint" as the original was burned in the library fire, and any claimed text post-fire was not created until earliest 100, probably more likely 200 or later. The usurpation of the title "Septuagint" is a sign of charlatans attempting to give their creations validity.
Early in the video, the coordinator totally misrepresents Bart Ehrman's position. He claims that Bart holds the position that errors in the Bible means there is no God. That it not Bart's position at all. He lost his faith for different reasons. I have specifically heard him say that it is possible for God to have given us a Bible that is not inerrent. Where Bart differs from most Christians is that he recognizes limitations on our ability to know historical facts, whereas many Christians claim to know those facts for sure. Secondly, he draws deductions or "most likely scenarios" that are at odds with the traditional views on the matter taken by mainstream Christianity. He does so employing rigorous historical criteria, rather than simply adopting and defending the traditional church view.
This was fantastic as usual until the very last statement. I don’t get the constant drumbeat of the worldly DEI messaging. I don’t care if a panelist has purple skin, 3 legs, and is from Venus. I just want knowledgeable, qualified, Godly people up there. Isn’t that enough?
The most encouraging aspect of this panel discussion is the lack of agreement...remember, the past can only be recorded, it can not be replicated...
When you put out videos, please check the audio level. It is difficult to hear what is been said. Anything preventing you from using a PA system when conducting such programs?
Where can I go or are any of these guys countering the recent arguments from Dr Riddle ?
So, which part is God's and which is human? Where are the boundaries?
And that's the rub. It's the inspired word of God, written by people. Different parts are inspired to different degrees.
The panel and host continually refer to the "Septuagint" although none of this tome is ancient, it is actually recent, circa 100-400.
The Septuagint was used by Jesus and the Apostles, what’s your problem with it?
@@allenbrininstool7558 Neither Yeshua nor "apostles" had a "Septuagint" as the original was burned in the library fire, and any claimed text post-fire was not created until earliest 100, probably more likely 200 or later. The usurpation of the title "Septuagint" is a sign of charlatans attempting to give their creations validity.
Early in the video, the coordinator totally misrepresents Bart Ehrman's position. He claims that Bart holds the position that errors in the Bible means there is no God. That it not Bart's position at all. He lost his faith for different reasons. I have specifically heard him say that it is possible for God to have given us a Bible that is not inerrent.
Where Bart differs from most Christians is that he recognizes limitations on our ability to know historical facts, whereas many Christians claim to know those facts for sure. Secondly, he draws deductions or "most likely scenarios" that are at odds with the traditional views on the matter taken by mainstream Christianity. He does so employing rigorous historical criteria, rather than simply adopting and defending the traditional church view.
This was fantastic as usual until the very last statement. I don’t get the constant drumbeat of the worldly DEI messaging. I don’t care if a panelist has purple skin, 3 legs, and is from Venus. I just want knowledgeable, qualified, Godly people up there. Isn’t that enough?
🙏 *Promosm*