0:15 company: visual capitalist. 1:40 the chart is largely decorative. 3:50 if you make consulting style slides, you want to put key take away of the charts. 4:25 you cannot see the info represented in the chart but they are relevant. 4:45 - 4:55 connection from the title and chart. add callout. 5:05 they look different and serve different purpose and different situations. 5:25 the tool that i use and recommend, is call... for consulting firms. 8:15 the downsides of the chart - one primarily being, there's a lot of lines, also the title is bad. 9:10 a good practice to include the labels besides the line than the legends. 9:50 2 things to emphasize the title: 1. add horizontal line; 2. add shadow box. 10:35 put the time when these companies cross/pass the 1 trillion mark. muted color vs. standout color. 12:15 question: whether the profit margin is to this company or to this model of car; also hard to percei ve the height difference. 13:40 the diverging bar chart. 14:30 add the descriptive title. 14:50 extra supporting details 15:40 help put the focus back to the tesla than the nio.
This is an awesome channel. I do appreciate everything on your videos. I am currently an intern and I have been applying your ways of making presentation into my tasks. And it got positive responds from others. Thank you man appreciate it. Keep it up ! You're videos are simple and very easy to understand.
Hi Paul, thanks for the tutorial. How do I download the market cap for Chart 2? the source website does not provide the time series data, only a chart. Thanks.
I'm curious about your choice to use the same color palette as the original chart for the line graph about the trillion-dollar club. Would it not be better to use contrasting colors, rather than a green to red gradient, given that red/green color-blindness is relatively common? Obviously, it's not difficult to follow the lines from the labels, but they do cross each other often.
Yes, this is a great consideration. I chose the colors I did to try and keep the general style similar to the original chart, but realistically something more colorblind friendly would have been a smarter choice. Thanks for your comment!
Thanks for the fast response, and that's fair enough. Also, thank you for all the great content. Your videos are genuinely interesting and enlightening
I suppose the headline could add more context (since we have no clue how much is 400M tonnes on its own) say 400M combined rice production (which is 53% of the total global production/capacity)
Great video. Do you have an example on how to structure technical presentations? Say you want to present a new technical solution that would reduce cost, increase performance, capture market shares etc.
Excellent once again. 2 questions, what is the tablet you're using and what course would you recommend for a consultant wanting to improve their visualization skills for corporate presentations?
Thank you! Tablet is from XP-Pen. It's not the best for this but it gets the job done. For courses, I recommend ours! We have an Advanced Presentations for Consultants course and a Data Visualization for Consultants course that are both really popular.
Great video as always! Is there a video or do you know a fellow RUclipsr how does exactly the opposite? So turning company slides into exciting and engaging visuals ?
Great video. However, sorry, Ex-McKinsey here, so I just can't help myself: In the 3rd chart, you mixed up "net profits per car" with "proft margins" - like the original chart also did. Now English is not my first language, but my definition of a profit margin is a percentage of a sale price, not a dollar figure. And I am 99% sure that this is the correct definition. Theoretically Tesla's profit margin could be lower than GM's - if the average sales price of a Tesla would be more than 4.5x the sales price of a GM electric car. I understand that this is not the case, but still - I wouldn't be surprised if the average Tesla sales price is at least 30% higher than GM's sales prices for their electric cars. If that's true, this chart is biased towards Tesla. So this is a good chart for an average consultant, but for McKinsey I would give this a C. Need to keep the standards high :) Other than that, great channel ;)
The chart itself and the description of the chart are fine as they appropriately label the data as "net profit per vehicle". It's the title of the slide (copied from original chart) and the callout (my mistake 😅) that need to be changed. Nice catch!
📣 Get your free 1-month subscription to Ampler here ☞ my.ampler.io/alumni/theanalystacademy
0:15 company: visual capitalist.
1:40 the chart is largely decorative.
3:50 if you make consulting style slides, you want to put key take away of the charts.
4:25 you cannot see the info represented in the chart but they are relevant.
4:45 - 4:55 connection from the title and chart. add callout.
5:05 they look different and serve different purpose and different situations.
5:25 the tool that i use and recommend, is call... for consulting firms.
8:15 the downsides of the chart - one primarily being, there's a lot of lines, also the title is bad.
9:10 a good practice to include the labels besides the line than the legends.
9:50 2 things to emphasize the title: 1. add horizontal line; 2. add shadow box.
10:35 put the time when these companies cross/pass the 1 trillion mark.
muted color vs. standout color.
12:15 question: whether the profit margin is to this company or to this model of car; also hard to percei ve the height difference.
13:40 the diverging bar chart.
14:30 add the descriptive title.
14:50 extra supporting details
15:40 help put the focus back to the tesla than the nio.
This is an awesome channel. I do appreciate everything on your videos. I am currently an intern and I have been applying your ways of making presentation into my tasks. And it got positive responds from others. Thank you man appreciate it. Keep it up ! You're videos are simple and very easy to understand.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication 👌🏾
Paul you are incredible! just love your videos and since I started watching I have recommended your channel to at least 50 people!!!
Thank you!! Appreciate the support and the recommendations. More to come!
Great job! Channel is seriously underrated
Literally recommending this channel to all the corporate people I know
Thank you so much for sharing small tips that make big difference in message delivery!
you are just good at what you do. I have improved so so much with my data presentations, just by watching and implementing your concepts.
This was excellent, thank you!!
love your passion for ppt!
THIS is the content we need in RUclips. 😃
your channel is a goldmine i just discovered...
Thanks for sharing the tool you use ✅. Videos are well paced and clear, top stuff
I really like all these videos about slide design.
What are your thoughts on your style compared to something like Nancy Durate?
Love your videos. Can you please do one on creating a SWOT analysis slide?
awesome! Love to see more!
I love this channel!!!!
This video is awesome! Thank you so much!
Hi Paul, thanks for the tutorial.
How do I download the market cap for Chart 2? the source website does not provide the time series data, only a chart.
Thanks.
logical thinking is excellent in revamping slides
Which font style are you using? This is an amazing style
I'm curious about your choice to use the same color palette as the original chart for the line graph about the trillion-dollar club. Would it not be better to use contrasting colors, rather than a green to red gradient, given that red/green color-blindness is relatively common?
Obviously, it's not difficult to follow the lines from the labels, but they do cross each other often.
Yes, this is a great consideration. I chose the colors I did to try and keep the general style similar to the original chart, but realistically something more colorblind friendly would have been a smarter choice. Thanks for your comment!
Thanks for the fast response, and that's fair enough.
Also, thank you for all the great content. Your videos are genuinely interesting and enlightening
I suppose the headline could add more context (since we have no clue how much is 400M tonnes on its own)
say 400M combined rice production (which is 53% of the total global production/capacity)
Could we have used stacked area chart to show the revenues of the 4 companies? rather than the line chart?
Also in the tesla chart maybe we can use tornado chart?
Great video. Do you have an example on how to structure technical presentations? Say you want to present a new technical solution that would reduce cost, increase performance, capture market shares etc.
Paul, i always struggle with tables. what i do is make a table in excel past it on ppt. is this the right way ?
How do you animate the chart when the supporting data comes in?
Brain explosion, this is gold. Man, thanks for sharing it.
Excellent once again. 2 questions, what is the tablet you're using and what course would you recommend for a consultant wanting to improve their visualization skills for corporate presentations?
Thank you! Tablet is from XP-Pen. It's not the best for this but it gets the job done. For courses, I recommend ours! We have an Advanced Presentations for Consultants course and a Data Visualization for Consultants course that are both really popular.
@@AnalystAcademy perfect, thank you.
Very enlightening, thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
Superb ❤
amazing videos, do you know another alternative for Mac? the ampler charts does not work for Mac.
Thanks! Think-Cell works on Mac and is a good alternative. (For the charts feature anyway)
Btw if you haven’t already check out this video! ruclips.net/video/7rctMH_sflM/видео.htmlsi=RinspuNJPmftDL34
Great video as always!
Is there a video or do you know a fellow RUclipsr how does exactly the opposite? So turning company slides into exciting and engaging visuals ?
Excellent!! thank you
Talk about Top-shelf, Grade-A stuff!
SWOT analysis video would be awesome
Noted, thank you!
Amazing info
magnificent!
Awesome🎉
Great video. However, sorry, Ex-McKinsey here, so I just can't help myself: In the 3rd chart, you mixed up "net profits per car" with "proft margins" - like the original chart also did. Now English is not my first language, but my definition of a profit margin is a percentage of a sale price, not a dollar figure. And I am 99% sure that this is the correct definition. Theoretically Tesla's profit margin could be lower than GM's - if the average sales price of a Tesla would be more than 4.5x the sales price of a GM electric car. I understand that this is not the case, but still - I wouldn't be surprised if the average Tesla sales price is at least 30% higher than GM's sales prices for their electric cars. If that's true, this chart is biased towards Tesla. So this is a good chart for an average consultant, but for McKinsey I would give this a C. Need to keep the standards high :) Other than that, great channel ;)
The chart itself and the description of the chart are fine as they appropriately label the data as "net profit per vehicle". It's the title of the slide (copied from original chart) and the callout (my mistake 😅) that need to be changed. Nice catch!
also not clear the scale of measure: millions/billions ? Would add currency and measures marks to the chart
Thank you very much
Im from Bangladesh 😂 and we eat rice 3 times in a day
🎉 🙌🏼🙏💫👏🏼