😈😈 FINISH LISTENING TO ALL STORIES / UPDATES HERE ruclips.net/p/PL4qCR1644UR0Z4S8QKTe0MYZFVaNXuAUY 🧠🧠 Am I the Genius? - ruclips.net/video/3tRyPNFsEDM/видео.html 📸📸 instagram.com/amithejerk
Story 5: OP is not the jerk. He just wanted the house since the brother was proposing that the parents sell the house which legit has SENTIMENTAL VALUE too, not just price value. OP stated that the house was there for 3 gens, and he wants to inherit it bc of its sentimental value. Also, OP never said anything abt DESERVING the house, and he seemed like he wouldnt have forced talked 'bout it further if the parents agreed with OP's brother. The brother also has made bad financial decisions in the past and the parents helped him.
Inheritance story, children are *NOT* entitled to their parents estate. That being said, the parents are free to leave their estate to whomever they want.
Although OP deserves the house more, not just because he has a family, but because that brother has been bailed out so many times financially (and it came to my attention the brother would only sell the house anyway). Best thing they could do is A. Put the house in a trust with their names and OP’s names in it so as to avoid inheritance tax, probate, and being sued by the brother. B. Do the trust thing, but put the brother’s name on a small percentage of the trust, and the OP can buy out his brother so as not to deal with him and his brother can start a new life, or C. Do the same as A. but give the brother a cash equivalent of the share of the house’s appraised/assessed value with the stipulation that if he contests any will or tries to sue the estate or sue his brother, he’ll get nothing and like it.
Agreed. As far as I can see it, if the brother wants everything split 50/50 then the brother needs to pay the parents back for every last cent they put into bailing him out first because that money no doubt came out of their own savings and the potential inheritance that would be split between their children. Or he can grow up and accept that he's already getting more than half of everything between the money his parents spent on him and then getting basically everything but the house on top of it since OP and the parents are fine with OP getting the house and the brother getting the rest. Fair is only fair when all the circumstances are looked at, even the ones you wanna avoid because they make it actually fair
The sibling rivalry story. The only thing that is going to happen if the OP shows up at restaurant is a fight would erupt. With the restaurant owner starting the fight.
Story 5 OP is not the Jerk, their parents help to get the brother out of debt. so he has got a lot money from them, that OP has not. So it's not only becouse he has a family, that he whants the house. But in the end it's the parents Who decide gets what.
On the story about op and his wife carrying the boxes and the IDIOT security guard, op your wife sounds awesome. I love it she put that IDIOT security guard in his place, lolllllll.
I’m sorry story 5 op is not the jerk, they mentioned that the house is a FAMILY home, I agree that to keep things fair OP should pay out 1/2 the home to his brother in exchange but even then the brother is not entitled to it. His brother has made plenty of poor financial decisions and the parents helped him plenty of times while OP got his shit straight
With the house story, the original poster is not being a jerk. In fact his proposal actually seems very fair all he’s getting in inheritance is just the house. His brother is getting literally everything else.
@@AnimeGamer501st even so it’s not very likely that the original poster knows that after all we have no idea where the house is located or what the parents net worth is. I mean, my parents don’t share their net worth with me so I have no idea whether they’re net worth actually is.
@@Azulakayes true it does mention the savings, but it doesn’t mention anything else. 401(k) stock portfolio, petty cash that’s etc. Their net worth could be much higher than the house. They just don’t have it in our savings account. There’s not enough information to go on.
@@Azulakayes who gives a damn about monetary? It's sentimental. He called it their "generational home" which means that it has been in the family for generations. The brother is being a jerk by wanting to sell something of such monumental emotional value just because he is horrible at saving his own money
@@Azulakayes yes I did and savings only means savings. It does not include economically, speaking stock, portfolios, businesses, etc. When someone is talking about savings, they normally mean a savings account not retirement, pensions, Social Security, or anything else that would tribute to net worth.
Inheritance story: The Brother already got a lot of his inheritance. His parents provided him enough money that it put their finances in a bad situation for a bit. If they really want to make it fair they can total up all the money that went to him to bail him out and subtract it from the inheritance.
Either Daisy is really spoiled or something else happened either way the parent are idiot for trying to forcing the guy to go see her. It's even stupider that they say to that the brother should put aside their differences instead of Daisy
OP is ABSOLUTELY NOT the jerk in story 5. The house has sentimental value but their parents have almost no money asides from that. The solution? It seems to me that, from what the brother said, OP already owns a house which is smaller than their parent's. Maybe OP could inherit the house and he could sell or transfer his old house to his brother so he could sell it or whatever. It's a win-win resolution
Story 1: I dont get why the OP put up with this crap for 3 years. Some people just should not be allowed to be landlords and/or rent out their homes. This landlord is the epitome for awful landlords. There are a lot of good landlords out there, but this guy is the poster child of bad ones. Good on the OP for reporting all of this to both police and building inspectors. Hopefully this guy spends some good time in jail. Story 2: Well done by the OP. You sir, are awesome! I dont get why old guys like this constantly try to hit on women decades younger then them ilke this. I get that age is only a number, but come on.... did he really think this was going to go well? Also, dont try and pull the "im old therefore i dont have to listen to you/you have to listen to me" card here. This old guy is really lucky all he got was a stern talking to by the OP, because there are a lot of people out there that would've gotten physical pretty quickly. Story 3: Considering how lousy of a sibling and person Daisy is to the OP, im surprised that the OP even acklowledges her existance, much less wanting to go to her new restaurant. Also, there is no way the parents dont know what had happened between the OP and Daisy, so to pull the "family supports family" line makes them jerks too, but Daisy is the obvious bigger jerk here. Screw her. Story 4: Talk about being super judgmental here. Good on the wife for telling off this stupid security guard, and other people too it sounds like. They all need to rack off. Honestly, i wouldve considered complaining against the security guard for harassing them. Story 5: OP is not a jerk here and if anything, the brother is the selfish one here, not the OP. This is also a good reason as to why you dont openly discuss inheiritance or estates or anything of the like.... it is ALWAYS going to cause some kind of resentment or bitterness among someone, and thats exactly whats going on here. The parents are in no way bias here, and it does sound like they've given the brother a lot over the years too. In the end, nothing in their estate has be to split 50/50, this is all up the parents here and no one else. Story 6: Not the jerk at all here... Ruby is 100% a freeloader here. She definitely needs to grow up here and do something here. Since the OP and her mom arent accepting any kind of rent or anything... then why should she try and do anything to better herself? Everything the OP was 100% called for here. Give it enough time and they will pretty much take over the whole house. They need to shape up or ship out.
As an security guard for 6+ years i can say he is not a security guard that ppl would want if he stick his nose into ppls business out of now where like that for no reason other than to flex his nonexistent authority around
Story 1: That was a slumlord, more than a landlord. I’m glad the slumlord got a felony, but OP needs to sue him to the point where he ends up owning that property. Also, why put up with it for so long? Story 2: “You can’t talk to me like that!” says the jerk who S.H.’d a random woman. Story 3: Don’t support nor reward people who are horrible to you. If anything, try to boycott the restaurant that she owns. Try to find any health code violations and report them. OP did nothing wrong. Those parents are stupid and so is Daisy. Story 4: What an idiot rent-a-cop. He needs to mind his own business and OP should report him to his employers. I love what the wife said. Story 5: NTA. If any reason, than because the brother got bailed out so many times. But the parents should at least leave the brother with something, if not a percentage ownership of the house then the financial equivalent so he won’t be left high and dry. To leave one son the house yet the other nothing is a bad idea, he could contest the will. Story 6: NTA. You gave her and her mom free shelter, it wouldn’t hurt her and her mom to help out around the house if they don’t adequately help out nor properly financially contribute. You even let them bring in their wild pet cat and drive them around because they don’t drive. Ruby is the selfish one, and needs to grow up.
everyone who has commented on story 5 keeps saying that, there was obviously more discussion behind it. yes it does hit the "i have a family, he doesn't" button, but did you miss the part where the brother said "its too much for one person", meaning he intended to sell the house if he got it anyways. and the part where the home has been in the family for generations, and seeing as the next generation was up and coming.... its easy to call someone selfish, its hard to see that its not.
@@PartytimeYOLO I thought it was OP who said it was too much for one person, not the brother. I didn’t realize the brother wanted to sell that house, either (mistook that for OP’s opinion). I was doing the dishes while listening. Oops.
I disagree. The people opting to get the house is getting the smaller cut since it's worth less than half of the savings. The parents already said he would get what was left over if they get the house. Also, it's the parent's money. They can give whatever they want to whoever they want. The kids have no claim over anything
16:46 did we listen to two different stories? It sounds like the brother assumed it would be his then got mad when that wasn't the case. I'm sorry but the brother just sounds like a leech🤷♂️
I was gonna say, it would make more sense for the brother with the family to get to live in the house but couldn’t the parents split the ownership of the house between the two and have a contract of some kind between the two?
@@Azulakayes the brother said "The house is too big for one person" Which means he was thinking of himself. As someone who grew up spending time on my grandparents property, i would rather die than sell it for "fairness" or "splitting assets equally". The brother is not thinking of anyone but himself, OP only mentioned that since he is not one person and has a family maybe he should get it instead of their parents selling their home that has been in their family for generations. I would rather share my grandparents home with my cousins or have one of them own it than sell it to complete strangers. The brother only wanted to sell the house so his retirement savings would be better, he said so himself. OP and his brother had equal opportunities but it sounds as if their parents saved him from debt more times than they care to share. I don't know about you, but I personally wouldn't want to give a ton of money to someone who has a history of getting themselves into debt.
I agree with you on most of these, but the house inheritance one, I think you're absolutely wrong on. It's not being an asshole to want the family home precisely because you have a family. The brother is being a jerk because he's only thinking on the money. If the house was valued as less, he'd probably argue that he get all the cash and his sibling gets the house. Inheritance doesn't have to be split completely equally and many times it shouldn't be. The house also comes with expenses, you know, upkeep and all that. The brother can take the cash and invest it or blow it or whatever. This all still being up in the air because the parents aren't going to kick the bucket anytime soon it sounds.
last story you’re friend and her mother are the jerks here there lazy and free loading when you have time off take your friend and her mother down to the welfare office and tell them to apply for government housing and government assistance then once they have a house change the locks or they might claim squatters rights and it can years to get them out 😡🤬😤🤔
You are so far off on Story 5. OP stated parents had handed him money over and over. And the parents don’t want the house sold and the brother doesn’t want to live there. So HOW EXACTLY is he the jerk?? And I am so happy to see that I am not alone on this one.
Story 5 op is not the jerk! The host is being a little bit of a jerk here as well as the brother of original poster. Just because somebody has a family does not mean that they're being a jerk or they feel like they deserve it more because of that. Original poster wanted the house because it was a family generation thing and there was a lot of sentimental value behind it and the brother only wanted it so he could probably sell it for more cash because all he was concerned about was money from what the sounds of it. If the brother ended up getting it and the parents didn't sell it he would have probably sold it for the cash. Besides that the brother actually had ended up getting more money over time as well in the past according to the original poster. It sounds like a fair payout in my opinion but even if it wasn't they could do like a joint thing where they like share the house or part of it being rented out or something to the brother and just because the original poster has a wife and kids and is closer doesn't mean that they're in the wrong. It sounds like original Poster's brother was just jealous and wanted the money and even if the house wasn't sold and they got the house then he was probably going to sell it anyways. Original poster was not in the wrong in any way and they were trying to figure out which was the best option and the brother said it best when he had stated that it was too big for one person. If it's too big for one person then obviously it would have been good to give it to the original poster but now you just want to get jealous because they're not willing to sell the house and instead want to give it to original poster because of your comment. That's what it sounds like here.
This reminds me of a story my mom told me when she was a kid she lived in a trailer park with her 2 sisters and my grandma and grandpa for i think about 10 years and for some reason the owner of it had it out for my grandpa he hated him a-lot and my grandpa also hated him now for my story my mom had told me that my grandpa had built a huge deck for their house and when they were getting ready to move out of that place the owner demanded the porch too even though my grandpa built it himself which isn’t the owners he wanted it idk why i asked my mom why and she said she doesn’t know why but those 2 hated each other my grandma actually still has the porch at her house so they obviously didn’t let the owner of the trailer park have it
I think for story Five that it Wout be fair to have the Brother/uncle live in the House with them but there is a Little fee for livibg in the Family House 👇 like if you find it fair
I would have agreed but the op is kinda the jerk , the brother tried to compromise so both cuz have money but the op just wants to house even tho the brother should have a half of it , a better solution would have been for the op to buy out the brother's half of the house so him and his family can fully own it and the brother to have some money for his retirement
@@CarsFnaf given how the brother was described handling money, its doubtful it would have been used on retirement. and seeing as the parents are still alive and this is there will, no one is entitled to anything. not to mention the fact its not just a "house", its a home, a home that their family has lived in for generations.
@@PartytimeYOLO it is a “house” no matter what and I brought out the half and half thing to be fair to both siblings regardless of anything, the op wants the house and the brother doesn’t but it’s technically both of their house in my scenario hints my solution to the problem.
OP is the jerk. First, he attempts to manipulate the readers opinion of his brother by mentioning his financial situation. We don't know the specifics, but even if he's not the best with money, it shouldn't matter for this situation unless he's using the money for illegal purposes. If anything, it just means he may need the money more than OP. secondly, It's definitely not a fair split at all. Even if he got everything but the house it still doesn't sound like that would be of equal value. Thirdly, if OP did the reasonable thing to buy out his brothers half now, he still can sell it in the future which would likely be appraised at a higher value than it's current value so OP still would benefit. Unless I missed something, the best solution would be to get it appraised, give OP 50%, divide remaining assets or give all remaining assets to brother under the assumption the home value will be equal to or greater than the value of the remaining assets. OP doesn't need the money as much as his brother apparently, but that doesn't mean the brother deserves less wtf lol.
The third story. The OP isn't the jerk for not wanting to go the opening of her sister's restaurant but it wouldn't hurt to be the bigger person and go to her restaurant pay for a meal, eat and leave without causing too much drama. The fifth story. I'm going to have to disagree with the narrator on the jerk part. The OP isn't the jerk he has a family and the OP's parents agree to keeping the house in the family plus the the way the OP's brother responded that it's too big for only one person is a red flag. If they sold the house I'll bet the brother would want a bigger share of the money because he doesn't have any savings to retire. So the best option in my opinion would be to find out what the house is worth and give about half of the money to the brother to make things fair.
You assume the brother would ask for more than 50/50..... When OP literally asked for what's more than likely the biggest part of the "inheritance"... 15:00 Brother said share... Also the brother was staying there already...
@@RedrumZombies Yes I did assume that because according to the OP, if we believe that whatever he said is true, his brother wanted to sell the house and divide the money that doesn't imply a 50/50 split and the brother also assumed that he would inheriting the house. So both brothers wanted the house as an inheritance, one wants it for his family and the other for an easier retirement life. That's why I suggested the best option would be for the OP to buy out his brother's half of the inheritance, under writing of course, and be done with the whole ordeal.
Obviously did not listen to the story properly about the inheritance. They want to give the one brother the entire monetary some the parents have and just keep the house so he can keep it in the family with his children, and also the older brother is the one who said we should sell the house because it's just too much for one person to have. Meaning that the older brother was thinking he would be the one to get the house and leave his little brother floating in the wind with nothing. So quite frankly you saying he should pay the brother half of the value of the house while living the brother keep the entire monetary some of what is left of his parents estate upon their death is actually unfair and would make YOU the jerk
The inheritance story, the narrator is always on the side of its up to the people writing the will and all of a sudden changes? Narrator flip flops. Its up to the parents and the son with the family should get the house and the other son should get the rest
The op in the story about the house and op want to keep it. Yes the op is the jerk. How ever my grandparents house has been taken care of by my family. So I'm wanting to take it over the house when my grandparents die. This do to my family taking care of the house.
😈😈 FINISH LISTENING TO ALL STORIES / UPDATES HERE ruclips.net/p/PL4qCR1644UR0Z4S8QKTe0MYZFVaNXuAUY
🧠🧠 Am I the Genius? - ruclips.net/video/3tRyPNFsEDM/видео.html
📸📸 instagram.com/amithejerk
3 storie 3 genartion home keep it
Story 5: OP is not the jerk. He just wanted the house since the brother was proposing that the parents sell the house which legit has SENTIMENTAL VALUE too, not just price value. OP stated that the house was there for 3 gens, and he wants to inherit it bc of its sentimental value. Also, OP never said anything abt DESERVING the house, and he seemed like he wouldnt have forced talked 'bout it further if the parents agreed with OP's brother. The brother also has made bad financial decisions in the past and the parents helped him.
Honestly if OP gives brother his old house, I would find him not the jerk.
Inheritance story, children are *NOT* entitled to their parents estate. That being said, the parents are free to leave their estate to whomever they want.
Stuff like this is why you dont discuss inheritance/estates. It always causes drama.
Although OP deserves the house more, not just because he has a family, but because that brother has been bailed out so many times financially (and it came to my attention the brother would only sell the house anyway). Best thing they could do is
A. Put the house in a trust with their names and OP’s names in it so as to avoid inheritance tax, probate, and being sued by the brother.
B. Do the trust thing, but put the brother’s name on a small percentage of the trust, and the OP can buy out his brother so as not to deal with him and his brother can start a new life, or
C. Do the same as A. but give the brother a cash equivalent of the share of the house’s appraised/assessed value with the stipulation that if he contests any will or tries to sue the estate or sue his brother, he’ll get nothing and like it.
I agree with @DigitalCowboy000, but it sounds like the parents want the house to go to one of the brothers.
Agreed. As far as I can see it, if the brother wants everything split 50/50 then the brother needs to pay the parents back for every last cent they put into bailing him out first because that money no doubt came out of their own savings and the potential inheritance that would be split between their children. Or he can grow up and accept that he's already getting more than half of everything between the money his parents spent on him and then getting basically everything but the house on top of it since OP and the parents are fine with OP getting the house and the brother getting the rest. Fair is only fair when all the circumstances are looked at, even the ones you wanna avoid because they make it actually fair
The sibling rivalry story. The only thing that is going to happen if the OP shows up at restaurant is a fight would erupt. With the restaurant owner starting the fight.
Agreed. Screw Daisy.
@@QuickManEXE und Daisy accusing the OP of "ruining" her day.
@@DigitalCowboy000 And then do you want to bet that the parents would blame it on the OP
@QuickManEXE exactly. Probably saying something along lines of "you should have known better..."
@@DigitalCowboy000 or the parents would say to OP “Be ThE bIgGeR pErSoN!” if OP had gone and Daisy had started bullying her again.
Story 5 OP is not the Jerk, their parents help to get the brother out of debt. so he has got a lot money from them, that OP has not.
So it's not only becouse he has a family, that he whants the house.
But in the end it's the parents Who decide gets what.
On the story about op and his wife carrying the boxes and the IDIOT security guard, op your wife sounds awesome. I love it she put that IDIOT security guard in his place, lolllllll.
I’m sorry story 5 op is not the jerk, they mentioned that the house is a FAMILY home, I agree that to keep things fair OP should pay out 1/2 the home to his brother in exchange but even then the brother is not entitled to it. His brother has made plenty of poor financial decisions and the parents helped him plenty of times while OP got his shit straight
With the house story, the original poster is not being a jerk. In fact his proposal actually seems very fair all he’s getting in inheritance is just the house. His brother is getting literally everything else.
House > everything is probably the case
@@AnimeGamer501st even so it’s not very likely that the original poster knows that after all we have no idea where the house is located or what the parents net worth is. I mean, my parents don’t share their net worth with me so I have no idea whether they’re net worth actually is.
@@Azulakayes true it does mention the savings, but it doesn’t mention anything else. 401(k) stock portfolio, petty cash that’s etc. Their net worth could be much higher than the house. They just don’t have it in our savings account. There’s not enough information to go on.
@@Azulakayes who gives a damn about monetary? It's sentimental. He called it their "generational home" which means that it has been in the family for generations. The brother is being a jerk by wanting to sell something of such monumental emotional value just because he is horrible at saving his own money
@@Azulakayes yes I did and savings only means savings. It does not include economically, speaking stock, portfolios, businesses, etc. When someone is talking about savings, they normally mean a savings account not retirement, pensions, Social Security, or anything else that would tribute to net worth.
Inheritance story: The Brother already got a lot of his inheritance. His parents provided him enough money that it put their finances in a bad situation for a bit. If they really want to make it fair they can total up all the money that went to him to bail him out and subtract it from the inheritance.
Bro just pulled the random shit out of his ass for the two last stories lmao
Either Daisy is really spoiled or something else happened either way the parent are idiot for trying to forcing the guy to go see her. It's even stupider that they say to that the brother should put aside their differences instead of Daisy
Oh I heard this story on Tiktok and was hoping for a resolution! Thank you for that!
Blood makes you related not family
thats the same exact thing moron.
OP is ABSOLUTELY NOT the jerk in story 5.
The house has sentimental value but their parents have almost no money asides from that. The solution? It seems to me that, from what the brother said, OP already owns a house which is smaller than their parent's. Maybe OP could inherit the house and he could sell or transfer his old house to his brother so he could sell it or whatever. It's a win-win resolution
Story 1: I dont get why the OP put up with this crap for 3 years. Some people just should not be allowed to be landlords and/or rent out their homes. This landlord is the epitome for awful landlords. There are a lot of good landlords out there, but this guy is the poster child of bad ones. Good on the OP for reporting all of this to both police and building inspectors. Hopefully this guy spends some good time in jail.
Story 2: Well done by the OP. You sir, are awesome! I dont get why old guys like this constantly try to hit on women decades younger then them ilke this. I get that age is only a number, but come on.... did he really think this was going to go well? Also, dont try and pull the "im old therefore i dont have to listen to you/you have to listen to me" card here. This old guy is really lucky all he got was a stern talking to by the OP, because there are a lot of people out there that would've gotten physical pretty quickly.
Story 3: Considering how lousy of a sibling and person Daisy is to the OP, im surprised that the OP even acklowledges her existance, much less wanting to go to her new restaurant. Also, there is no way the parents dont know what had happened between the OP and Daisy, so to pull the "family supports family" line makes them jerks too, but Daisy is the obvious bigger jerk here. Screw her.
Story 4: Talk about being super judgmental here. Good on the wife for telling off this stupid security guard, and other people too it sounds like. They all need to rack off. Honestly, i wouldve considered complaining against the security guard for harassing them.
Story 5: OP is not a jerk here and if anything, the brother is the selfish one here, not the OP. This is also a good reason as to why you dont openly discuss inheiritance or estates or anything of the like.... it is ALWAYS going to cause some kind of resentment or bitterness among someone, and thats exactly whats going on here. The parents are in no way bias here, and it does sound like they've given the brother a lot over the years too. In the end, nothing in their estate has be to split 50/50, this is all up the parents here and no one else.
Story 6: Not the jerk at all here... Ruby is 100% a freeloader here. She definitely needs to grow up here and do something here. Since the OP and her mom arent accepting any kind of rent or anything... then why should she try and do anything to better herself? Everything the OP was 100% called for here. Give it enough time and they will pretty much take over the whole house. They need to shape up or ship out.
This is the first time I’ve heard him confirm the OP is the jerk oh my god-
As an security guard for 6+ years i can say he is not a security guard that ppl would want if he stick his nose into ppls business out of now where like that for no reason other than to flex his nonexistent authority around
Story 3 : I would have gone and just not eaten… not supported Daisy and would have pissed her off seeing OP there 😂😂😂
Story 1: That was a slumlord, more than a landlord. I’m glad the slumlord got a felony, but OP needs to sue him to the point where he ends up owning that property. Also, why put up with it for so long?
Story 2: “You can’t talk to me like that!” says the jerk who S.H.’d a random woman.
Story 3: Don’t support nor reward people who are horrible to you. If anything, try to boycott the restaurant that she owns. Try to find any health code violations and report them. OP did nothing wrong. Those parents are stupid and so is Daisy.
Story 4: What an idiot rent-a-cop. He needs to mind his own business and OP should report him to his employers. I love what the wife said.
Story 5: NTA. If any reason, than because the brother got bailed out so many times. But the parents should at least leave the brother with something, if not a percentage ownership of the house then the financial equivalent so he won’t be left high and dry. To leave one son the house yet the other nothing is a bad idea, he could contest the will.
Story 6: NTA. You gave her and her mom free shelter, it wouldn’t hurt her and her mom to help out around the house if they don’t adequately help out nor properly financially contribute. You even let them bring in their wild pet cat and drive them around because they don’t drive. Ruby is the selfish one, and needs to grow up.
everyone who has commented on story 5 keeps saying that, there was obviously more discussion behind it. yes it does hit the "i have a family, he doesn't" button, but did you miss the part where the brother said "its too much for one person", meaning he intended to sell the house if he got it anyways. and the part where the home has been in the family for generations, and seeing as the next generation was up and coming....
its easy to call someone selfish, its hard to see that its not.
@@PartytimeYOLO I thought it was OP who said it was too much for one person, not the brother. I didn’t realize the brother wanted to sell that house, either (mistook that for OP’s opinion). I was doing the dishes while listening. Oops.
I disagree. The people opting to get the house is getting the smaller cut since it's worth less than half of the savings. The parents already said he would get what was left over if they get the house. Also, it's the parent's money. They can give whatever they want to whoever they want. The kids have no claim over anything
16:46 did we listen to two different stories? It sounds like the brother assumed it would be his then got mad when that wasn't the case. I'm sorry but the brother just sounds like a leech🤷♂️
Thats the way i saw it too.
I was gonna say, it would make more sense for the brother with the family to get to live in the house but couldn’t the parents split the ownership of the house between the two and have a contract of some kind between the two?
@@Brians2019 exactly! Like renting a room from them or having specific set of chores
@@Brians2019or as the Narrator said the op can just buy out the brother's half of the house
@@Azulakayes the brother said "The house is too big for one person" Which means he was thinking of himself. As someone who grew up spending time on my grandparents property, i would rather die than sell it for "fairness" or "splitting assets equally". The brother is not thinking of anyone but himself, OP only mentioned that since he is not one person and has a family maybe he should get it instead of their parents selling their home that has been in their family for generations. I would rather share my grandparents home with my cousins or have one of them own it than sell it to complete strangers. The brother only wanted to sell the house so his retirement savings would be better, he said so himself. OP and his brother had equal opportunities but it sounds as if their parents saved him from debt more times than they care to share. I don't know about you, but I personally wouldn't want to give a ton of money to someone who has a history of getting themselves into debt.
for the third story pay half the house from brother with your money as you have said you have everything going well and he don't
Amen
On the first story, great job op. Your landlord is a BIG PIECE OF CRAP.
Dam 8 minutes ago and no attention, people should respect him more
Show this to Daisy and the parents, and hopefully at least your parents will realize what a toxic sociopath Daisy is.
Ty for the video.
Just because you are related by blood, that's not a measure to be called family.
Story 6. Is there not a transit bus in your area? If so, why don't Ruby and her mom take the bus to and from work?
I agree with you on most of these, but the house inheritance one, I think you're absolutely wrong on.
It's not being an asshole to want the family home precisely because you have a family.
The brother is being a jerk because he's only thinking on the money.
If the house was valued as less, he'd probably argue that he get all the cash and his sibling gets the house.
Inheritance doesn't have to be split completely equally and many times it shouldn't be.
The house also comes with expenses, you know, upkeep and all that.
The brother can take the cash and invest it or blow it or whatever.
This all still being up in the air because the parents aren't going to kick the bucket anytime soon it sounds.
3:00 Um yeah. Most of the things noted that the landlord did was already illegal so he could have been charged a whole lot more
You should’ve gone to her restaurant went full Karen mode. asking for the manager and dissing the restaurant completely.
Did we read different stories on the third one? Like wtf 😅
last story you’re friend and her mother are the jerks here there lazy and free loading when you have time off take your friend and her mother down to the welfare office and tell them to apply for government housing and government assistance then once they have a house change the locks or they might claim squatters rights and it can years to get them out 😡🤬😤🤔
Story 2. Your parents are WRONG! You do NOT have to listen to them ANYMORE!
A petite swede... wow
You are so far off on Story 5. OP stated parents had handed him money over and over. And the parents don’t want the house sold and the brother doesn’t want to live there. So HOW EXACTLY is he the jerk?? And I am so happy to see that I am not alone on this one.
Story 5 op is not the jerk! The host is being a little bit of a jerk here as well as the brother of original poster. Just because somebody has a family does not mean that they're being a jerk or they feel like they deserve it more because of that. Original poster wanted the house because it was a family generation thing and there was a lot of sentimental value behind it and the brother only wanted it so he could probably sell it for more cash because all he was concerned about was money from what the sounds of it. If the brother ended up getting it and the parents didn't sell it he would have probably sold it for the cash. Besides that the brother actually had ended up getting more money over time as well in the past according to the original poster. It sounds like a fair payout in my opinion but even if it wasn't they could do like a joint thing where they like share the house or part of it being rented out or something to the brother and just because the original poster has a wife and kids and is closer doesn't mean that they're in the wrong. It sounds like original Poster's brother was just jealous and wanted the money and even if the house wasn't sold and they got the house then he was probably going to sell it anyways. Original poster was not in the wrong in any way and they were trying to figure out which was the best option and the brother said it best when he had stated that it was too big for one person. If it's too big for one person then obviously it would have been good to give it to the original poster but now you just want to get jealous because they're not willing to sell the house and instead want to give it to original poster because of your comment. That's what it sounds like here.
This reminds me of a story my mom told me when she was a kid she lived in a trailer park with her 2 sisters and my grandma and grandpa for i think about 10 years and for some reason the owner of it had it out for my grandpa he hated him a-lot and my grandpa also hated him now for my story my mom had told me that my grandpa had built a huge deck for their house and when they were getting ready to move out of that place the owner demanded the porch too even though my grandpa built it himself which isn’t the owners he wanted it idk why i asked my mom why and she said she doesn’t know why but those 2 hated each other my grandma actually still has the porch at her house so they obviously didn’t let the owner of the trailer park have it
Why has everyone already content u haven't even thoroughly watched the vid
I think for story Five that it Wout be fair to have the Brother/uncle live in the House with them but there is a Little fee for livibg in the Family House
👇 like if you find it fair
On the story about the brothers and the parents house, op you are NOT the jerk.
I would have agreed but the op is kinda the jerk , the brother tried to compromise so both cuz have money but the op just wants to house even tho the brother should have a half of it , a better solution would have been for the op to buy out the brother's half of the house so him and his family can fully own it and the brother to have some money for his retirement
@@CarsFnaf given how the brother was described handling money, its doubtful it would have been used on retirement. and seeing as the parents are still alive and this is there will, no one is entitled to anything. not to mention the fact its not just a "house", its a home, a home that their family has lived in for generations.
@@PartytimeYOLO it is a “house” no matter what and I brought out the half and half thing to be fair to both siblings regardless of anything, the op wants the house and the brother doesn’t but it’s technically both of their house in my scenario hints my solution to the problem.
OP is the jerk. First, he attempts to manipulate the readers opinion of his brother by mentioning his financial situation. We don't know the specifics, but even if he's not the best with money, it shouldn't matter for this situation unless he's using the money for illegal purposes. If anything, it just means he may need the money more than OP. secondly, It's definitely not a fair split at all. Even if he got everything but the house it still doesn't sound like that would be of equal value. Thirdly, if OP did the reasonable thing to buy out his brothers half now, he still can sell it in the future which would likely be appraised at a higher value than it's current value so OP still would benefit. Unless I missed something, the best solution would be to get it appraised, give OP 50%, divide remaining assets or give all remaining assets to brother under the assumption the home value will be equal to or greater than the value of the remaining assets. OP doesn't need the money as much as his brother apparently, but that doesn't mean the brother deserves less wtf lol.
People, the brother got A LOT of money from his parents through the years, I think he's gotten his inheritance ALREADY.
16:14 OP definitely the 🍑🕳️. OP should definitely be paying 1/2 the market rate for the house because u know OP will try and split the appraised value
The third story. The OP isn't the jerk for not wanting to go the opening of her sister's restaurant but it wouldn't hurt to be the bigger person and go to her restaurant pay for a meal, eat and leave without causing too much drama.
The fifth story. I'm going to have to disagree with the narrator on the jerk part. The OP isn't the jerk he has a family and the OP's parents agree to keeping the house in the family plus the the way the OP's brother responded that it's too big for only one person is a red flag. If they sold the house I'll bet the brother would want a bigger share of the money because he doesn't have any savings to retire. So the best option in my opinion would be to find out what the house is worth and give about half of the money to the brother to make things fair.
You assume the brother would ask for more than 50/50..... When OP literally asked for what's more than likely the biggest part of the "inheritance"...
15:00 Brother said share...
Also the brother was staying there already...
@@RedrumZombies Yes I did assume that because according to the OP, if we believe that whatever he said is true, his brother wanted to sell the house and divide the money that doesn't imply a 50/50 split and the brother also assumed that he would inheriting the house. So both brothers wanted the house as an inheritance, one wants it for his family and the other for an easier retirement life. That's why I suggested the best option would be for the OP to buy out his brother's half of the inheritance, under writing of course, and be done with the whole ordeal.
Obviously did not listen to the story properly about the inheritance. They want to give the one brother the entire monetary some the parents have and just keep the house so he can keep it in the family with his children, and also the older brother is the one who said we should sell the house because it's just too much for one person to have. Meaning that the older brother was thinking he would be the one to get the house and leave his little brother floating in the wind with nothing. So quite frankly you saying he should pay the brother half of the value of the house while living the brother keep the entire monetary some of what is left of his parents estate upon their death is actually unfair and would make YOU the jerk
I like ur vids
Story 3 I wonder if daisy is the first born and op is the second born with the ruined my life comment
🙂 Have a nice day.
Bro there are literally 3 first viewers
BTW I AM THE 11 TH COMMENT
The inheritance story, the narrator is always on the side of its up to the people writing the will and all of a sudden changes? Narrator flip flops. Its up to the parents and the son with the family should get the house and the other son should get the rest
The op in the story about the house and op want to keep it. Yes the op is the jerk. How ever my grandparents house has been taken care of by my family. So I'm wanting to take it over the house when my grandparents die. This do to my family taking care of the house.
Just me who miss the other narrator...?
Dam 34 seconds no views, bro fell off
… he only had 34 secs…
What are you smoking
Y’all are special, it’s a joke
@@13silence13 if it's a "joke" shouldn't it be funny
It’s being sarcastic, I never said it was funny, I said it was a joke, and it’s ok if you don’t get the joke
36 minutes
First
You should leave relevant comments
i'm first viewer and first and like
First
Nuh uh