I’m South African, I just want to say this is a very good quick video on the colonial history of South Africa. A lot of videos from news companies don’t even mention the British settlers nor the Indians labourers.
@@gs-nq6mw for your head, u think we are native Americans or native Australia or native Brazil or native Mexico or native New Zealand or native Canada…
I'm South african and White and Speak Afrikaans as my mother tongue and I support Israel only as a people not a place Israel is a People only the State of Israel i do not recognize
@@okumhlopheindodaactsxvii4022 do you mean you support Jews? or Zionists? Funny story most of the israelis now are descendents of juddah not israel.... yeah im confused too lol
@mkeufish ubhuti wami. ngiyakuthola lokhu okushoyo. kodwa uyazi njengoba ngenza, ukuthi kudala i-afrika yayibizwa ngoJuda my brother. i do get what you are saying. but you know as well as i do, that long ago africa was called Judah
let I Jason put it simply to @@MrHRanjha : Jesus knows the Jews works and tribulation and poverty but the Jews are rich and the blasphemy of those who say the Jews are Jews and it is not but a liar of a synagogue of Satan. Rev2:9 Behold, Jesus will bring Jesus' people out of the synagogue of Satan, which say Jesus' people are Jews, and are not, but lie: Jesus will cause the Synogoge of Satan to come and worship before Jesus' people, and know that Jesus have loved Jesus' people. Rev3:9 (2×9=18 & 3×9 = 27 & 18+27=45 & 45 = the number of author's of the books of the Torah (books of Moses) the Scriptures (old testament) and the Injeel (new testament) .
@@ishmaeltalks just too bad that we've been in this land before them. Just too bad that their surnames proof you that they came recently from Syria, Egypt, Lebanon etc. Just too bad that we have 4000 years of history in this land. Bad bad truth.
The Ashkenazi European Jews are non Semitic and have nothing to do with Palestine. And by the way is a Jew a race or religion or a tribe or an ideology or even an a feeling?
Cool video, now make one about Turkish colonization and imperialism and all the atrocities they committed in the Balkan, Anatolia and the rest of the Middle-East.
It ridiculous that hold "white man" accountable. "White" is comprehensive category that including historically oppressed people like Polish Irish and groups never had foreign colonies outside of Europe like Hungarians Romanians, Serbians, and other eastern europeans. Blaming whites for British act is just like blaming entire Africans for the tragedy in Rwanda.
Sometimes I think they just wanted Sunshine and other food than fish and chips. But the fact is the evil ones wanted more... ...and they took it. ( sorry, stole it)
As an Afrikaner, this video is highly accurate. And I wish it was taught to us like this in schools. The indigenous people of SA were the Khoi San. Not the black tribes who came from Central Africa. It seems to only be slighly mentioned in the video. The Boer were obviously wrong in occupying the land by force and oppression the black people many years later. Do we Afrikaners today agree with what our ancestors did? No. Currently, theres a fight in SA about who should own the land. And that ofcourse should be the Khoi San
😂😂 very laughable interpretation by someone who shipped himself thousands of kilometers to a continent and authoritatively decide and identify who owns the land.
You came from a completely different continent and you want to argue about whose land it was?😂 buddy people of your skin tone aren’t even native to that sector of the world
The Western Cape and the Northern Cape were entirely Khoisan at the time of the Dutch arriving and had been there for tens of thousands of years(they’re the oldest extant people) ,the “Bantus” arrived at the latest 100-300 AD on the eastern part of South Africa displacing the Khoisan who lived on that side.I’m not trying to say that the Zulus,Xhosa,Ndebele,Tswana and the other South African tribes arrived late cause nearly 1700 years since first arriving is an extremely long period of time,just needed to clarify as a South African
Bantus Are the traditional people of West Africa. Twa/Pygmy people Are the traditional people of Central Africa. Tutsis Are the traditional people of East Africa. Southern Africa was distinct tribes. Before the arrival of Bantus, Germans, Dutch, British etc
@@adineatha9766 The Bantu first originated around the Benue- Cross rivers area in southeastern Nigeria and spread over Africa to the Zambia area. West Africa have distinct tribes
@@freegalsen5556 Yeah I think Nigeria, Cameroon, Sao Tome, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Congo and Angola is Bantu stronghold. West Africa is more Afro-Berber and Afro-Tuareg (Berber and Tuareg mixed with Black). Central Africa is Twa/Pygmy land. East Africa is Tutsi land. Southern Africa is Mulatto (European mixed with Black).
@@midnightflight8594 Bantus are Black Africans with wide faces and body. Their traditional homeland is West Africa. But also Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Congo and Angola. African Americans are descendants of Bantus. Pygmy/Twa people are very short Black Africans with either Bantu (wide face) or Tutsi (small face). They are the traditional people of Central Africa and are mainly Catholics. Tutsis are Black Africans with small face and slim bodies. Similar to Ethiopians, Eritreans, Djibouti and Somali people. They are to be found in Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania and Malawi. And they are mainly Protestant Christians instead of Orthodox like Ethiopians and Eritreans. Or Sunni muslim like Djibouti and Somali people.
TRT Turkish state propaganda. More like showing every historical crime of other countries while pretending Turkey is innocent and reject most Turkish crimes while also occupying Cyprus with the same excuse the German NAZlS used in ww2 "protecting the oppressed German minority" therefore Turkey expelled 100k Greek Cypriots and replaced them with mainland Turkish settlers, they got punished for a annexation attempt done by another state (Greece). Turkey is a bit like 1930s Germany.
Here is something TRT will never tell you: Turkish war crimes "The prohibition on deporting or transferring parts of a State’s own civilian population into the territory it occupies is set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention.[1] It is a grave breach of Additional Protocol I.[2] Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court, “the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts.[3]" "If i don't steal Cyprus, someone else will(Greek Junta State 1974) ." -Turkish occupation of Cyprus 1974-2021 Turkey punished over 150k Greek Cypriots because another state "Greek junta 1967-1974" tried to annex them in 1974 even tho most of them were against it. The Junta's annexation attempt failed yet Turkey chose to keep occupying Cyprus and replace the 150k Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish ill*gal settlers. Turkey just found an excuse to steal land and change the demographics. The so called killings of Turkish Cypriots which you Turks claim it was actually a small civil war 10 years before the invasion in 1964 which was a fight between EOKA B and TMT and had casualties in both Sides. Fun fact, most Greek Cypriots were against EOKA B but most Turk Cypriots supported TMT. TMT wanted TAKSIM (to steal 50% of Cyprus and give it to the Turks which was almost complete since Turkey occupies 36%,150k Greek Cypriots were expelled and replaced by mainland ill*gal Turkish war criminal settlers.) Germany in WW2 "Inv*ding a small country to protect the "oppressed" German minority therefore Germany expelled them and replaced them with Germans." Does this remind you of something? The same excuse the Turks used to inv*de and steal 36% of Cyprus and replace 150k+ expelled Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish settlers. Turkey expelled many Greeks between 1924-1960s Imagine if Greece inv*ded 36% of Turkey because of the Greeks Turkey expelled in 1964 and many times before (way after the 1923 population exchange)
The Bantu people colonized the North region. The Dutch were present in the Cape area for 93 years before they encountered the Bantu at the Fish River. It is believed that the Bantu killed over 2 million San and Khoekhoe people and seized their land. Could you please create a video on this historical event?
Various Bantu groups engaged with the Khoisan in diverse ways, ranging from occasional skirmishes to coexistence and assimilation. In instances where conflict was avoided, Bantu tribes often integrated Khoisan individuals into their own communities, leading to the emergence of distinct tribes and kingdoms such as the Tswana, Sotho, Karanga, and Xhosa. These communities reflect a cultural, linguistic, and ethnic amalgamation of both Bantu and Khoisan influences. Notably, Bantu groups adopted linguistic elements, including clicks, from the Khoisan. Examples such as the Kingdom of Mapungubwe, led by Khoisan figures, and archaeological sites like the Kweneng Ruins highlight instances of cohabitation between these two groups. The Khoisan, with an intimate knowledge of the land, were often nomadic, yet their population remained limited due to reliance on hunting and gathering, coupled with a dependence on natural conditions. In contrast, the Bantu, with more organized societies, engaged in agriculture and livestock farming, strategically migrating to regions suitable for cultivating indigenous crops, albeit less frequently than the Khoisan. Contrary to popular belief, it was the Portuguese, not the Dutch, who first encountered the native inhabitants of the Cape. Early Portuguese accounts depict the natives more in line with Bantu characteristics than Khoisan. This does not imply Bantu presence predating the Khoisan but rather suggests that both groups had already populated the entire southern region. When the Dutch eventually arrived, many Bantu communities had already relocated to more fertile lands. The subsequent period of Mfecane, marked by the Zulu's conflicts with other groups, led to further displacement, reshaping the dynamics of the region. The notion of an "empty land" and the artificial division between Khoisan and Bantu communities were ideas perpetuated by the Apartheid Government to bolster their claims to the land. However, in reality, the rightful ownership of the land belongs to all Africans, whether Bantu, Khoisan, or settlers who wholeheartedly embraced not only the physical expanse but also the native people and their diverse cultures. It is essential to recognize that these divisive narratives were employed to justify discriminatory policies rather than accurately reflecting the rich tapestry of indigenous histories and shared heritage. True ownership extends beyond mere occupation, acknowledging the deep connections forged with the land and its inhabitants, irrespective of ethnic or cultural backgrounds.
@@marcelhaines7712 though the khoikhoi have been on these lands the longest, the bantu had already reached south africa by 500AD and in around the years 1540 the bantu met the Portuguese at Cape of Good Hope way before any Dutch had landed there. the Bantu (Nguni) ended up moving upper east ward to where more fertile land was and trade ships could easily reach and also closer to the dominant kingdom at the time the Munhumutapa. Khoikhoi have been targets of all groups that landed in South Africa but most ended up being assimilated into the bantu forming Xhosa, Basoto, Tswana and some even reached leadership in Mapungubwe.
@qhave then you are pleased every time you re even mentioned. 'they occupied empty land. This was illigal. Said researchers.' Now there s a journalist approach. Why isnt a totally empty Africa some ones property, and if so, who decides this? Why didn t Netherlands Government send troops? Because they settlers and outcasts. Is this diamand and gold story true? So gold was like not invented?! Yet? Byzantium era rings a bell? Only some millenia. Or a vast customer base arose since China then had cars or whatever? Its a bl::dy fairytale..how can you say this. If you said as a citizin of SA i m appaled i d be pleased .. ..
How did the small white minority took over the large black majority, 2 things 1 they had guns and 2 and education on how to make and manufacture guns, if the black population had that, plus a few allies, then the Dutch would have never taken over South Africa or any country where people had the means to defend themselves, Vietnam is the perfect example, Yea the Viet Cong might be farmers, but the North Vietnamese Army were educated and had access to guns from Russian and China.
Do you know that the Voordtrekker came before the Dutch, the Voordtrekker Afrikaaner which is not the dutch but An Afrikaaner the Voordtrekker who Fled the Persecution of the Christians in Europe by the Knights Templar Crusaders or the Catholic church, the Voordtrekker who strongly remembers there Ancestors who where Enslaved in Africa by Africans before there time, and thought because there Ancestors where enslaved in Africa and earned nothing from being enslaved, decided to Settle in south Africa from crossing all of North Africa into South Africa, and when Vasco da Gama came to South Africa Vasco da Gama made a report of 5 people's living in south Africa and the Voordtrekker was one of them, this is before jan van riebeecks time
@@aobakwemhele6613 @Aobakwe Mhele 13th-16th Century AD(in the Year of the LORD) specifically Barbary Coast NORTH AFRICA there were more White Christians Enslaved than all Black slaves ever on this entire earth, yes your ancestors owned White Christian Slaves, your ancestors raped and Killed Christian woman and children, yet today there's no Justice for my Christian ancestors and your ancestors transgressions against white Christians, but today however you want justice for something the British did in south Africa where the Afrikaaners where not even part off get your facts straight you ignorant K-AFIR
@@okumhlopheindodaactsxvii4022 ahh yes, insulting me really shows your intelligence or in this case, lack of intelligence. I won't argue with someone who believes what they want to believe and disregards fact and evidence.
Xhosa,Zulus and etc were already in South Africa when White's arrived but to different province's as it is until now. Western cape dominated by koisan Easten Cape by Xhosas KZN by Zulus and it was always like that long time before you came in.. You came in South Africa and stole the land then kill people no other way around
Exactly. And Mpumalanga was dominated by Amaswati, Amambo and San. Xhosa people are traced to be in eastern cape around 7 century and Zulus existed way before that. And white people want to whipp our really history by lying saying we arrive in South Africa with them. That's a big lie. Our ancestors had been here for centuries before Europeans came here
@@bongekasityoshwana2969 Europeans mean that Bantus didn't arrive in Western Cape and Northern Cape, not all of South Africa. Europeans accept that Khoisans lived in these lands before them, but not Bantus.
You were not here...all lies..bantus even go as far as saying the khoisan didnt ever exist or they have all died out to prove their right to khoisan land..how sad
You do realise that what the zionists in Israel are doing is exactly what the ANC wants do? ( take someone's land on the basis that it was once theirs) For example the Israelite are invading land on the premise that it was once theirs, and the ANC is expropriating land on the premise that it was once theirs
@@shipslnka no not completely the same. One group is saying it was there 2000 years ago with zero prove, one group the whites and stoled their land. Not remotely the same.
@@DirtyEdonyou know whites in israel are a minority? Or is it convenient to ignore? Yet there are mountains of archealogical proof of a jewish presence there long before islam and christianity. Is that convenient to ignore too?
In the Name of Queen and country..and the Great Monarchy had Blood in its Hand and its Legacy...let them come openly and accept its Fault and ask forgiveness But noone shall speak this nor seek Forgiveness from Her Majesty
In the Ottoman Empire,slaves could become someone. They could become soldiers,artisans ,governors,ministers...prime ministers. Some of them married the sultans daughters. Today,the descendants of the Ottoman slaves are equal citizen of the Turkish Republic. In other words,they are free. While the former slaves of the Western powers ,are still fighting for their freedom.
If there was no European intervention in Africa by Jan van Riebeeck in 1652, there would not have been the progress that you can see today. Speak the truth.
In South Africa, especially inlands and very south points were empty as it was hard for hunter gathererers to live in big numbers in such climates. It’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding land ownership and usage in South Africa. While recognizing the historical struggles for land by various nations and ethnic groups worldwide, we must also consider the unique context of South Africa. Many of the indigenous communities, such as the Zulu and Xhosa, were traditionally hunter-gatherers and may not have had a sense of land ownership in the way we think of it today. While it’s crucial to foster opportunities and support for black African farmers, we need to approach this issue thoughtfully. Displacing families who have cultivated and nurtured land for generations can have devastating effects and does not provide a sustainable solution to poverty. Instead of focusing on division, let’s work towards creating equitable solutions that uplift all communities. It’s vital for leaders to find ways that genuinely benefit everyone rather than exploiting tensions for profit. Together, we can strive for a more just and compassionate future for all.
The worse is those same people also claim the land was empty when they arrive and only the Khoisan were there when they arrived, then they claim the Khoisan who they found there were genocided by the Bantu (who were not there by the way according to the Boers when they are arrived). So my simple question is, IF THE BANTU WERE NOT THERE WHEN THE BOERS ARRIVED AND ONLY THE KHOISAN PEOPLE WERE THERE, HOW EXACTLY DID THE BANTU GENOCIDE THE KHOISAN? - IF THE BANTU WERE NOT THERE AND CO-EXISTING WITH THE KHOISAN BEFORE THE BRITISH ARRIVED, THEN HOW DID THE BANTU MANAGE TO HAVE THEIR LANGUAGE INFLUENCED BY THE KHOISAN WITH THE CLICKS OF THE LANGUAGE, SOMETHING THAT WOULD'VE TAKEN THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF COEXISTENCE
Bantus didn't genocide the Khoisan in Western Cape and Northern Cape, but in the rest of South Africa which is currently inhabited by Sothos, Zulus, Tswanas, etc. That's why you don't see any Khoisans in KZN or Eastern Cape. It was a gradual process that took centuries and happened long before European arrival.
LOL Complete fiction. The reason the Western part (roughly border of Cape Colony down from Botswana border to Southern Coast) is relatively less dense is because Europeans engaged in genocide chasing natives beyond the frontier. Neither Khoi nor San labels refer to concrete tribes, but rather broad way of life references, pastoralist & hunters. *The ancestors of today's Africans.* "khoisan" is a 20th century ficticious abstraction by Schulze. It's ahistoric. Khoi = pastoralists. (Khwe) San was reference to those leading hunter-gatherer way of life. Bantu isn't a singular group of people either, nor proto-bantu/proto-agrarians millennia ago on the continent, but *in the SA context* refers to linguistic dialect category of evolved native modern click languages or agro-pastoralism in tool. XHOSA, is a concrete modern polity named after a then minor ascendant agro-pastoralist native HOUSE (House named after an individual, later on forming a large umbrella nation). The agro-pastoralist house being in a stronger position to organise & resist the Dutch, the hunter-gatherer & pastoralist natives of the Cape *banded together* under this house and formed today's large umbrella nation called XHOSA, pushed out along the Eastward-expanding Cape Colony frontier, into the frontier naative reserve. From the 1700s to the late 1800s they then fought the intermittent hundred-years war/frontier war (with many also being labour of the colony). *The SA native has been a blend of ancient pygmy and proto-agrarian for millennia, and that is who Europeans found.*
A pity our corrupt government has retarded south Africa's progress, we should be enjoying an abundant life for everyone,(peace,prosperity and racial harmony).
@sami would be polite-instead of spray random insults - to name which countries. I ll be humble enough to be a country thank you. (Don t feel very powerful today)
@@samit7570 Well, French and Netherlands kids get taught history. Accurate. They are democratic countries..France and Netherlands are not North Korea and Afghanistan, for your info. They have average to good education.
Actually, it’s a middle man engulfed in the business of spreading fallacious propaganda to the Turkish people. Also, they should fire this narrator, her English is abhorrently terrible.
The British still employed slave like tactics to their foreign laborers, especially the Indians who couldn't return home and faced brutal conditions under the British boot. Ending "Slavery" was in name only, not in action.
Another name for slavery is called Indentured laborers.... any way people are not stupid anymore by giving their lands to the colonizers for a handful of broken beads and a cracked mirror😂😂. Divide and rule was their motto.. ... sit back and giggle while they caused conflict between brothers...
They didn't build south africa the black people did cause they were forced via slavery just like in America white people did not build America slaves did
The first freedom fighters were the Cape Malay , The makassarese, Javanese ,Malay , Bugis, Maluku and Sumbawan royals and political exiles and VOC resisters were all banished there/ The people from the Gowa Sultanate in Makssar, Mataram Sultanate, Cirebon, Banten and Malaka sulatanate were all banish by Dutch VOC criminals
The Africans were not one group, it was different tribes scattered all over and also very hostile with each other. The white men simply conquered them tribe by tribe, maybe if the tribes were united, we would be talking about history that's completely different than what it is now.
"Land that does not belong to them" is such a silly sentence to me especially when you look at the expanse of history and the migration of people. Should people not leave their boarders? Life's a competition and nothing belongs to anyone, it can be taken and you have to fight for it or take it for yourself. Things ebb and flow, from around 1500-present the west has dominated, before that other regions had a moment in the sun. Other regions success is what drove European's to pursue colonisation for a better life, its' just how history goes fam
@@captain4595 The way I see it the land of Europe doesn’t belong to Europeans they just exist there right now and will do for however long they can continue to maintain their control over the territory. Is it in European interests to let in certain people from outside the region? Probably not. Not if they want to maintain the society they’ve created - a society which is amongst the most successful in history. However, if you’re African or Arab and you want a better life for yourself of course you’re going to try making a go of it in Europe, and you can’t be mad at that.
The arrival of Jan van Riebeeck and his people led to centuries of development in South Africa. Make a video on the brutal murders of farmers who supplies food for South Africa.
The colonization of Anatolia which was Greek and the ethnic cleansing of “Native” Armenians & Assyrians in eastern Anatolia is the only colonization of Anatolia which was the fall on May 29, 1453. This will be rectified in the coming years.
@@sarban1653there was no ancient Greece or Armenia, get it, it is another failed zionist European colonial project just like israhell, they couldn't do it, they financed foreigners from the Balkans and Caucasus to colonize the collapsing ottoman empire to create a Christian land that follows the orders of European powers , but the Muslims destroyed the terrorists who called themselves Armenians and Greeks, it failed, they are still trying it, Palestine and the zionist European colonial project there was successful because there were only a few Palestinians, but in turkey we outnumbered the zionist hellenists and armenoids when we fought back they had literally no chance. There is a reason why you will find so many Armenians and Greeks outside of their supposed homelands, it's a european project, they never existed before.
No. Bantus were not in South Africa when white people arrived. Bantus arrived later and the Bantus persecuted the indigenous people far worse that whites ever did.
That’s a lie Bantu people were there way before whites when white people arrived they found many black ethnic dominating each province and started off by trading with the native groups to then starting wars to take their land . With your statement explain which groups are Native to KZN-Zulus, Eastern Cape- Xhosa,Free state- Sotho,Western Cape- Khoisan and more which means that you clearly don’t know South Africa’s backstory and as a black individual I have no hatred to white people in South Africa I just believe that native groups deserve what belongs to them especially land as many people try to act like there wasn’t a land act that forced people of colour to move away from fertile and reduced the ownership of natives owning their own land. 80% of South Africa is black but less than blacks own less than 5% of the land. Which whites,coloureds and Indians own more land even though none of them make 10 percent of population and not to forget apartheid making it hard for black people to get proper education and jobs. Plus bantu groups like Zulu,Xhosa,Sotho and more ethnic groups are native to South Africa just that the Khoisan came before them plus when the bantu groups arrived no white people existed in South Africa when you use common sense you realise that Africa is native Arabs and Black people mainly being black people so how would a race from Europe come before an African race just like how Europe is indigenous to white people so how would black people arrive there before whites.
@@NCB_music No. The people who were there before Europeans arrived were not Bantus. Bantus arrived as colonisers and they brutally persecuted the indigenous people. Sorry but you fed black nationalist lies.
@@suburbanyobbo9412 😂My guy white people come from Europe black people come from Africa how would a white person have came to Africa before black people?
@@suburbanyobbo9412 Plus the dna of a Khoisan is majority black and like I said black groups were in other provinces in South Africa which you couldn’t even answer my question to how that was the case. The only thing that makes Khoi people African is because they have black/african DNA in them. Ruined it for all the native South African groups with wars like Anglo-Zulu war, Great Cape war and many Xhosa frontier wars just that you don’t know history plus name one war against Nguni people and Khoisan this time don’t ignore the question.
@@relacionar111 No. They nurtured and developed the resources of the land to turn it into a modern wealthy country. Where you at today? Same land, same indigenous tribes. Your society is inferior in every way. I don't need to be asked, I can see if. Long live Rhodesia!
@@evilchaperone You're extremely d3ns3! Wh1tes committed g3n0cid3 against blacks and looted tons of wealth & resources from them, which are serious cr1m3s against humanity. In fact, wh1tes are actually 1nferi0r in every way, especially when it comes to humanity. I'm sure you're an ultra pro-Wh1te and anti-Bl@ck troll. Lol
1:15 As well as India. A quarter of all slaves came from South Asia (more than from Southeast Asia). "Malabar", "Pondicherry", "Ceylon", "Cochin", "Goa" and many other place names show up in records naming enslaved people.
@@sarban1653 can only think of some authors who've written on the slave trade and slavery in South Africa specifically: Robert Ross, Gabeba Baderoon, Pumla Ggola, Nigel Worden, Robert Shell.
Why dont you do a segment on "When the Ottomans arrived" or "when the Arabs arrived" I understand its trendy to criticise the White Man (as you put it) but how about some education on all sorts of colonialism. Colonialism was a part of history, that extended from ALL empires, not only Europeans! Remove your racist title of "When the White Man Arrived", it sets a horrible precedent and fuels a negative fire that helps no one! If you'd like to inform people on the history of nations, states, geopolitics, etc... by all means go ahead. But do your job and inform the people, do not look to establish an unnecessary underlining agenda to hate the white man.
@I wish every1 is happy 1day."If i don't steal Cyprus, someone else (Greek state) will." -Turkey 1974 Germany "Inv*ding a small country to protect the "oppressed" German minority therefore Germany expelled them and replaced them with Germans." Does this remind you of something? The same excuse the Turks used to inv*de and steal 36% of Cyprus and replace 100k expelled Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish settlers. Turkey expelled many Greeks between 1923-1960s Imagine if Greece inv*ded 36% of Turkey because of the Greeks Turkey expelled in 1964 and many times before (way after the 1923 population exchange)
Also, they did a wonderful job of neglecting to mention the fact that Shaka himself displaced many African tribes himself during the Mfecane. But because he wasn't white, that tends to not be an issue. Filtering history through the lens of race instead of merely recognizing that race played a part leads to a skewed view thereof.
they have every right to be angry and say what they want because at the end of the day, the people at the disadvantage in society, simply because of their skin color is them, not the white man.
The Sans got it from all ends from Khois, Bantus, Xhosas(Even though those groups are also Native to the African continent but still), Europeans, Desis, South East Asians, And Coulereds yeah
im American born and raised in nyc my son did a dna test and inherited all of this from me east asia AND south african AND AULSTRALIAN DNA OR SOMETHING AS WELL AS ALOT OF STUFF I COULDNT EXPLAIN BUT LOOKING AT MY MOM LOL I TOLD HIM I WOULDNT BE SURPRISED WHAT YOU MIGHT FIND. SO NOW I HAVE SOMETHING TO TELL HIM THAT YOU. I HAVE MORE SOUTH AND EAST AFRICAN THAN WESTBUT HOW THE HELL DID I GET HERE IF ITS TRUE AND HE WASNT ELIGIBLE FOR A AFRICAN DNA BECAUSE MY MALE LINE GOESE TO AMERICA AND ENGLAND AND IM A BLACK MAN BUT 15% OF MY DNA FROM MY MOM COMES FROM THE HETHERLANDS MAKES SENSE NOW AND THEY STATE EAST AND ENDED UP ON THE BERREN STRAIT BECAUSE THERE IS NATIVE AMERICAN DNA 6% 1% OF WHICH IS INUIT BUT IAM MOSTLY BLACK LOL
A lot of conflicting information and even more conveniently redacted to paint the Boer's in a bad light. Biased and cherry picked details. We'll just ignore the fact that The Bantu's captured and sold more of their own people as slaves than the Boers' ever did. "The Dutch farmers were really unhappy about British rule in the Cape & it led to the great Trek". Why not mention what policy led to that occurring? Slaves were being let FREE. Let's also forget the battle of Blood River and why it happened too. Such a one sided dialogue. Again, the great trek is painted in such a bad light, yet nothing mentioned about when West and North African Bantu's trekked down to South Africa and slaughtered the Khoi for their cattle and land to settle and colonize. Talk about the time frames before mentioning the 'homeland' already being 'founded'. Founded by who exactly? Not the Zulus. There were already Norwegian settlers and Indian slaves in Durban before any of that.
0.53 The statement made by the narrator is incorrect and ignorant. No land was seized by the Dutch. Only by the British. You need to go look deeper into the cultures of the Khoi, and San to understand what happened. Stop forcing your politically driven misinformation onto people.
Our children must be fully informed about our history. The pain l grew up in when seeing my elders harrassed under pass laws made me fear growth knowing that l too would be harrassed the same way. Life was hopeless to a large number of Africans in Apartheid times. The 99. 9 % of whites were so vicious, so arrogant and could not care what becomes of a black people. On the foot of the mountain on N2 road to town we could see Robin lsland and new that our leaders are incarcerated there some for life and we could not say a word about them. There were so many laws to keep us as prisoners in our own country whilst we were said to be free. This history should not be sugarcoated it should be said as it was and nothing else
I was just wanna correct something. The two Boer republics did not have limited independent control sanctioned by the British but were two completely independent republics until the end of the Second Boer War.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
*_"And then the British arrived"_*
@Nok su Kao and they still complained about why people coming to their country to look for a better future is bad.
And then whole humanity sucks
@Nok su Kao yep disadvantage of invading other countries.
South Africa was a lot nicer under British rule. Fact
Started with the Dutch actually and the British expanded and it ended off with the boers
I’m South African, I just want to say this is a very good quick video on the colonial history of South Africa. A lot of videos from news companies don’t even mention the British settlers nor the Indians labourers.
They(EU/US) still colonizing Africa right now in 2021,they are just using more cynical and low profile approachs
@@gs-nq6mw 😏
@@gs-nq6mw for your head, u think we are native Americans or native Australia or native Brazil or native Mexico or native New Zealand or native Canada…
@@gs-nq6mwglobal Americanisation is a big problem
Yeah and these people only talk about our history and our pain, their never celebrate our positives. I hate it.
That’s y Europeans can never justify that Israel is an aperthied regime. It’s just one of their own
I'm South african and White and Speak Afrikaans as my mother tongue and I support Israel only as a people not a place Israel is a People only the State of Israel i do not recognize
@@okumhlopheindodaactsxvii4022 do you mean you support Jews? or Zionists? Funny story most of the israelis now are descendents of juddah not israel.... yeah im confused too lol
@mkeufish ubhuti wami. ngiyakuthola lokhu okushoyo. kodwa uyazi njengoba ngenza, ukuthi kudala i-afrika yayibizwa ngoJuda
my brother. i do get what you are saying. but you know as well as i do, that long ago africa was called Judah
@mkeufish than what are you doing in Africa colonalist why don't you move back to Europe
let I Jason put it simply to @@MrHRanjha : Jesus knows the Jews works and tribulation and poverty but the Jews are rich and the blasphemy of those who say the Jews are Jews and it is not but a liar of a synagogue of Satan. Rev2:9
Behold, Jesus will bring Jesus' people out of the synagogue of Satan, which say Jesus' people are Jews, and are not, but lie: Jesus will cause the Synogoge of Satan to come and worship before Jesus' people, and know that Jesus have loved Jesus' people. Rev3:9 (2×9=18 & 3×9 = 27 & 18+27=45 & 45 = the number of author's of the books of the Torah (books of Moses) the Scriptures (old testament) and the Injeel (new testament) .
*"If I don't steal your house,someone else will"*
Yaqub an Israeli settler from Brooklyn USA 2021
*Yaqub The Land grabber*
Sounds like what Muslims did all their history😉
@Justin Y. What do you think? Grabbing land ofcourse
@@brojwz2314 cristans also
@Owais Tariq I'm not Indian and this is not what I think, it's facts
Imagine someone coming to your land and telling you what you can do and what you can’t
No need to imagine, it’s happening to Palestinians by Israel today
@@ishmaeltalks just too bad that we've been in this land before them. Just too bad that their surnames proof you that they came recently from Syria, Egypt, Lebanon etc. Just too bad that we have 4000 years of history in this land. Bad bad truth.
@@ילדביתר and lost to the christians? And the muslims freed it? And then you took the credit saying it's israeli land? What fookin joke
If I don't do it, someone else will. So what's the problem?
The Ashkenazi European Jews are non Semitic and have nothing to do with Palestine. And by the way is a Jew a race or religion or a tribe or an ideology or even an a feeling?
Everytime I read about a conflict or a humanitarian disaster the word British comes up .They are still depending on divide and rule policy.
These conflicts and humanitarian disasters would’ve happened regardless of British involvement.
@Ania khan I’m fighting Turkish propaganda.
@@jakecommonty2042 stating facts is not propaganda
@Ed Yeo yep, these Muslims ruïne their own countries and then blame somebody else
@Ed Yeo all of these countries are destroyed by western and Zionist conspiracies.
Cool video, now make one about Turkish colonization and imperialism and all the atrocities they committed in the Balkan, Anatolia and the rest of the Middle-East.
if they do, they'll portray the Ottomans as protagonists. It's only pillaging if it's Romans or descendants thereof.
Palestine 🇵🇸 will be free!!!
Cope
No way Jose!
From the river to the Sea!!!!!!
Palestinian will be free if their brother read to help them, u think African was free because the western love African… it was weapons to weapon…
From the river to the sea ✊🏿
Thanks for this. The white man wants us to forget this
@Nok su Kao So? Why do you think your way of living is superior than theirs? They are fine living as hunters and gatherers.
@Nok su Kao Cro-magnon or Caveman which one feet your
The black man will have all of South Africa for himself one day, but he will rule over ruins. Just like Liberia, Haiti and every black nation.
While busy hating your fellow black man it's pathetic
It ridiculous that hold "white man" accountable.
"White" is comprehensive category that including historically oppressed people like Polish Irish and groups never had foreign colonies outside of Europe
like Hungarians Romanians, Serbians, and other eastern europeans.
Blaming whites for British act is just like blaming entire Africans for the tragedy in Rwanda.
Can’t believe this is still going on today. Free Palestine
Wrong country
Sounds exactly like present day apartheid of Palestine.
Sometimes I think they just wanted Sunshine and other food than fish and chips.
But the fact is the evil ones wanted more...
...and they took it.
( sorry, stole it)
As an Afrikaner, this video is highly accurate. And I wish it was taught to us like this in schools. The indigenous people of SA were the Khoi San. Not the black tribes who came from Central Africa. It seems to only be slighly mentioned in the video. The Boer were obviously wrong in occupying the land by force and oppression the black people many years later. Do we Afrikaners today agree with what our ancestors did? No. Currently, theres a fight in SA about who should own the land. And that ofcourse should be the Khoi San
But most of us are dependents of khois mos
I am a black African, and yet many of us fail to understand this. We are fighting for land which was never ours to begin with
😂😂 very laughable interpretation by someone who shipped himself thousands of kilometers to a continent and authoritatively decide and identify who owns the land.
You came from a completely different continent and you want to argue about whose land it was?😂 buddy people of your skin tone aren’t even native to that sector of the world
Khoi/Khwe and San/Xam are black people. They are not white 😂😂😂😂
The Western Cape and the Northern Cape were entirely Khoisan at the time of the Dutch arriving and had been there for tens of thousands of years(they’re the oldest extant people) ,the “Bantus” arrived at the latest 100-300 AD on the eastern part of South Africa displacing the Khoisan who lived on that side.I’m not trying to say that the Zulus,Xhosa,Ndebele,Tswana and the other South African tribes arrived late cause nearly 1700 years since first arriving is an extremely long period of time,just needed to clarify as a South African
Bantus Are the traditional people of West Africa.
Twa/Pygmy people Are the traditional people of Central Africa.
Tutsis Are the traditional people of East Africa.
Southern Africa was distinct tribes.
Before the arrival of Bantus, Germans, Dutch, British etc
@@adineatha9766 What does Bantu mean
@@adineatha9766 The Bantu first originated around the Benue- Cross rivers area in southeastern Nigeria and spread over Africa to the Zambia area.
West Africa have distinct tribes
@@freegalsen5556 Yeah I think Nigeria, Cameroon, Sao Tome, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Congo and Angola is Bantu stronghold.
West Africa is more Afro-Berber and Afro-Tuareg (Berber and Tuareg mixed with Black).
Central Africa is Twa/Pygmy land.
East Africa is Tutsi land.
Southern Africa is Mulatto (European mixed with Black).
@@midnightflight8594 Bantus are Black Africans with wide faces and body. Their traditional homeland is West Africa. But also Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Congo and Angola. African Americans are descendants of Bantus.
Pygmy/Twa people are very short Black Africans with either Bantu (wide face) or Tutsi (small face). They are the traditional people of Central Africa and are mainly Catholics.
Tutsis are Black Africans with small face and slim bodies. Similar to Ethiopians, Eritreans, Djibouti and Somali people. They are to be found in Uganda, Kenya, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania and Malawi. And they are mainly Protestant Christians instead of Orthodox like Ethiopians and Eritreans. Or Sunni muslim like Djibouti and Somali people.
TRT is giving the historical facts in such a manner even an ordinary English knowing person can understand the events . Thanks lot .🇮🇳
TRT Turkish state propaganda. More like showing every historical crime of other countries while pretending Turkey is innocent and reject most Turkish crimes while also occupying Cyprus with the same excuse the German NAZlS used in ww2 "protecting the oppressed German minority" therefore Turkey expelled 100k Greek Cypriots and replaced them with mainland Turkish settlers, they got punished for a annexation attempt done by another state (Greece).
Turkey is a bit like 1930s Germany.
@@wat4089 OK .
Here is something TRT will never tell you:
Turkish war crimes
"The prohibition on deporting or transferring parts of a State’s own civilian population into the territory it occupies is set forth in the Fourth Geneva Convention.[1] It is a grave breach of Additional Protocol I.[2] Under the Statute of the International Criminal Court, “the transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” constitutes a war crime in international armed conflicts.[3]"
"If i don't steal Cyprus, someone else will(Greek Junta State 1974) ."
-Turkish occupation of Cyprus 1974-2021
Turkey punished over 150k Greek Cypriots because another state "Greek junta 1967-1974" tried to annex them in 1974 even tho most of them were against it. The Junta's annexation attempt failed yet Turkey chose to keep occupying Cyprus and replace the 150k Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish ill*gal settlers. Turkey just found an excuse to steal land and change the demographics.
The so called killings of Turkish Cypriots which you Turks claim it was actually a small civil war 10 years before the invasion in 1964 which was a fight between EOKA B and TMT and had casualties in both Sides. Fun fact, most Greek Cypriots were against EOKA B but most Turk Cypriots supported TMT. TMT wanted TAKSIM (to steal 50% of Cyprus and give it to the Turks which was almost complete since Turkey occupies 36%,150k Greek Cypriots were expelled and replaced by mainland ill*gal Turkish war criminal settlers.)
Germany in WW2 "Inv*ding a small country to protect the "oppressed" German minority therefore Germany expelled them and replaced them with Germans." Does this remind you of something?
The same excuse the Turks used to inv*de and steal 36% of Cyprus and replace 150k+ expelled Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish settlers.
Turkey expelled many Greeks between 1924-1960s
Imagine if Greece inv*ded 36% of Turkey because of the Greeks Turkey expelled in 1964 and many times before (way after the 1923 population exchange)
@@wat4089 oh
@@oppositionside4567 Turkey today reminds me of 1930s Germany.
I like that you mentioned the land was already inhabited
The Bantu people colonized the North region. The Dutch were present in the Cape area for 93 years before they encountered the Bantu at the Fish River. It is believed that the Bantu killed over 2 million San and Khoekhoe people and seized their land. Could you please create a video on this historical event?
Various Bantu groups engaged with the Khoisan in diverse ways, ranging from occasional skirmishes to coexistence and assimilation. In instances where conflict was avoided, Bantu tribes often integrated Khoisan individuals into their own communities, leading to the emergence of distinct tribes and kingdoms such as the Tswana, Sotho, Karanga, and Xhosa. These communities reflect a cultural, linguistic, and ethnic amalgamation of both Bantu and Khoisan influences. Notably, Bantu groups adopted linguistic elements, including clicks, from the Khoisan.
Examples such as the Kingdom of Mapungubwe, led by Khoisan figures, and archaeological sites like the Kweneng Ruins highlight instances of cohabitation between these two groups. The Khoisan, with an intimate knowledge of the land, were often nomadic, yet their population remained limited due to reliance on hunting and gathering, coupled with a dependence on natural conditions. In contrast, the Bantu, with more organized societies, engaged in agriculture and livestock farming, strategically migrating to regions suitable for cultivating indigenous crops, albeit less frequently than the Khoisan.
Contrary to popular belief, it was the Portuguese, not the Dutch, who first encountered the native inhabitants of the Cape. Early Portuguese accounts depict the natives more in line with Bantu characteristics than Khoisan. This does not imply Bantu presence predating the Khoisan but rather suggests that both groups had already populated the entire southern region. When the Dutch eventually arrived, many Bantu communities had already relocated to more fertile lands. The subsequent period of Mfecane, marked by the Zulu's conflicts with other groups, led to further displacement, reshaping the dynamics of the region.
The notion of an "empty land" and the artificial division between Khoisan and Bantu communities were ideas perpetuated by the Apartheid Government to bolster their claims to the land. However, in reality, the rightful ownership of the land belongs to all Africans, whether Bantu, Khoisan, or settlers who wholeheartedly embraced not only the physical expanse but also the native people and their diverse cultures. It is essential to recognize that these divisive narratives were employed to justify discriminatory policies rather than accurately reflecting the rich tapestry of indigenous histories and shared heritage. True ownership extends beyond mere occupation, acknowledging the deep connections forged with the land and its inhabitants, irrespective of ethnic or cultural backgrounds.
Least obvious zionist, it's like you copy pasted zionist rhetoric and applied it to this lmao
Probably wouldn't fit the narrative lol
I would love a video explaining this part...you know how this part must always stay hidden
@@marcelhaines7712 though the khoikhoi have been on these lands the longest, the bantu had already reached south africa by 500AD and in around the years 1540 the bantu met the Portuguese at Cape of Good Hope way before any Dutch had landed there. the Bantu (Nguni) ended up moving upper east ward to where more fertile land was and trade ships could easily reach and also closer to the dominant kingdom at the time the Munhumutapa.
Khoikhoi have been targets of all groups that landed in South Africa but most ended up being assimilated into the bantu forming Xhosa, Basoto, Tswana and some even reached leadership in Mapungubwe.
This look exactly like israel
Because Europe endorse and funds it.
The Zionists Israelis, came from Europe anyway. The Zionists behave exactly like the Western European Colonialists.
And guess who's behind that story... British.
I am very impressed, as a South African, with this video. Our history was summarised very well.
@qhave then you are pleased every time you re even mentioned. 'they occupied empty land. This was illigal. Said researchers.' Now there s a journalist approach. Why isnt a totally empty Africa some ones property, and if so, who decides this?
Why didn t Netherlands Government send troops? Because they settlers and outcasts. Is this diamand and gold story true? So gold was like not invented?! Yet? Byzantium era rings a bell? Only some millenia. Or a vast customer base arose since China then had cars or whatever? Its a bl::dy fairytale..how can you say this. If you said as a citizin of SA i m appaled i d be pleased .. ..
Let’s frequently seek forgiveness from Allah because nobody knows what will happen in the next minute Astagfirullah wa atuubu ilaihi🤲🏼
Yes all true I lived it during my childhood apartheid we were thrown out of our homes and took away our dignity how ever Allah is the best off planers
You were in South Africa?
Sounds like what is happening in Palestine 🇵🇸
this is giving israel’s occupation of Palestine
Can we see a report about the Turkish occupation and colonialism in Anatolia and the genocides on the Greeks and Armenians?
I want to see that too.
With all what these people did to us and someone are still uttering do equality. Don’t be ever deceived.
Yes my brother. Never allow them deceive you!
How did the small white minority took over the large black majority, 2 things 1 they had guns and 2 and education on how to make and manufacture guns, if the black population had that, plus a few allies, then the Dutch would have never taken over South Africa or any country where people had the means to defend themselves, Vietnam is the perfect example, Yea the Viet Cong might be farmers, but the North Vietnamese Army were educated and had access to guns from Russian and China.
Do you know that the Voordtrekker came before the Dutch, the Voordtrekker Afrikaaner which is not the dutch but An Afrikaaner the Voordtrekker who Fled the Persecution of the Christians in Europe by the Knights Templar Crusaders or the Catholic church, the Voordtrekker who strongly remembers there Ancestors who where Enslaved in Africa by Africans before there time, and thought because there Ancestors where enslaved in Africa and earned nothing from being enslaved, decided to Settle in south Africa from crossing all of North Africa into South Africa, and when Vasco da Gama came to South Africa Vasco da Gama made a report of 5 people's living in south Africa and the Voordtrekker was one of them, this is before jan van riebeecks time
You forgot one major concept, religion, specifically Christianity.
@@okumhlopheindodaactsxvii4022 utter nonsense! Go sleep kid!!
@@aobakwemhele6613 @Aobakwe Mhele 13th-16th Century AD(in the Year of the LORD) specifically Barbary Coast NORTH AFRICA there were more White Christians Enslaved than all Black slaves ever on this entire earth, yes your ancestors owned White Christian Slaves, your ancestors raped and Killed Christian woman and children, yet today there's no Justice for my Christian ancestors and your ancestors transgressions against white Christians, but today however you want justice for something the British did in south Africa where the Afrikaaners where not even part off get your facts straight you ignorant K-AFIR
@@okumhlopheindodaactsxvii4022 ahh yes, insulting me really shows your intelligence or in this case, lack of intelligence. I won't argue with someone who believes what they want to believe and disregards fact and evidence.
Xhosa,Zulus and etc were already in South Africa when White's arrived but to different province's as it is until now.
Western cape dominated by koisan
Easten Cape by Xhosas
KZN by Zulus and it was always like that long time before you came in..
You came in South Africa and stole the land then kill people no other way around
Exactly they act as though "Bantus" as they call us, weren't there in SA.
Exactly. And Mpumalanga was dominated by Amaswati, Amambo and San. Xhosa people are traced to be in eastern cape around 7 century and Zulus existed way before that. And white people want to whipp our really history by lying saying we arrive in South Africa with them. That's a big lie. Our ancestors had been here for centuries before Europeans came here
@@bongekasityoshwana2969 Europeans mean that Bantus didn't arrive in Western Cape and Northern Cape, not all of South Africa. Europeans accept that Khoisans lived in these lands before them, but not Bantus.
You were not here...all lies..bantus even go as far as saying the khoisan didnt ever exist or they have all died out to prove their right to khoisan land..how sad
Could you please direct me to research I can consume.
This is why as a South African I will ALWAYS support Palestine!!!
You do realise that what the zionists in Israel are doing is exactly what the ANC wants do? ( take someone's land on the basis that it was once theirs)
For example the Israelite are invading land on the premise that it was once theirs, and the ANC is expropriating land on the premise that it was once theirs
@@shipslnka no not completely the same. One group is saying it was there 2000 years ago with zero prove, one group the whites and stoled their land. Not remotely the same.
@@shipslnka israel openlu supported south africas apartheid regime and was one of few countries that didn't care
@@MohammedAli-hl4mr Proof?
@@DirtyEdonyou know whites in israel are a minority? Or is it convenient to ignore? Yet there are mountains of archealogical proof of a jewish presence there long before islam and christianity. Is that convenient to ignore too?
Thank you for stating that the Empty land theory has been debunked
To be honest. It’s South Africans (blacks) fault for apartheid.
Nope! It's whites' fault for apartheid. It's quite idiotic of you to defend crimin@ls. You must be complicit in g3nocid3 against bl@cks, aren't you?
In the Name of Queen and country..and the Great Monarchy had Blood in its Hand and its Legacy...let them come openly and accept its Fault and ask forgiveness
But noone shall speak this nor seek Forgiveness from Her Majesty
Shut up
In the Ottoman Empire,slaves could become someone. They could become soldiers,artisans ,governors,ministers...prime ministers. Some of them married the sultans daughters. Today,the descendants of the Ottoman slaves are equal citizen of the Turkish Republic. In other words,they are free. While the former slaves of the Western powers ,are still fighting for their freedom.
Those ex-slaves of the west are indigenous to the prosperous continent of Africa, what are they doing in America?
Slaves were literally killed in the ottoman empire after they weren't useful anymore
@@brojwz2314 Really? It shows how much you know...nothing.
@@jakecommonty2042 Maybe you have an answer for that.
They were castrated too.thats hardly free
If there was no European intervention in Africa by Jan van Riebeeck in 1652, there would not have been the progress that you can see today. Speak the truth.
Africans were happy with our natural way of life though. Modern day conveniences have also come with misery.
He must not know about Africa great empires 😂😂😂
Modern day b/s brought Covid here
In South Africa, especially inlands and very south points were empty as it was hard for hunter gathererers to live in big numbers in such climates.
It’s important to acknowledge the complexities surrounding land ownership and usage in South Africa. While recognizing the historical struggles for land by various nations and ethnic groups worldwide, we must also consider the unique context of South Africa. Many of the indigenous communities, such as the Zulu and Xhosa, were traditionally hunter-gatherers and may not have had a sense of land ownership in the way we think of it today.
While it’s crucial to foster opportunities and support for black African farmers, we need to approach this issue thoughtfully. Displacing families who have cultivated and nurtured land for generations can have devastating effects and does not provide a sustainable solution to poverty.
Instead of focusing on division, let’s work towards creating equitable solutions that uplift all communities. It’s vital for leaders to find ways that genuinely benefit everyone rather than exploiting tensions for profit. Together, we can strive for a more just and compassionate future for all.
The worse is those same people also claim the land was empty when they arrive and only the Khoisan were there when they arrived, then they claim the Khoisan who they found there were genocided by the Bantu (who were not there by the way according to the Boers when they are arrived).
So my simple question is, IF THE BANTU WERE NOT THERE WHEN THE BOERS ARRIVED AND ONLY THE KHOISAN PEOPLE WERE THERE, HOW EXACTLY DID THE BANTU GENOCIDE THE KHOISAN?
- IF THE BANTU WERE NOT THERE AND CO-EXISTING WITH THE KHOISAN BEFORE THE BRITISH ARRIVED, THEN HOW DID THE BANTU MANAGE TO HAVE THEIR LANGUAGE INFLUENCED BY THE KHOISAN WITH THE CLICKS OF THE LANGUAGE, SOMETHING THAT WOULD'VE TAKEN THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF COEXISTENCE
Bantus didn't genocide the Khoisan in Western Cape and Northern Cape, but in the rest of South Africa which is currently inhabited by Sothos, Zulus, Tswanas, etc. That's why you don't see any Khoisans in KZN or Eastern Cape. It was a gradual process that took centuries and happened long before European arrival.
@@sarban1653 sothos, tswana and xhosa are part Khoisan if you didnt know
the few that were left were forced into the different tribes@@martinmthethwa8901
LOL Complete fiction. The reason the Western part (roughly border of Cape Colony down from Botswana border to Southern Coast) is relatively less dense is because Europeans engaged in genocide chasing natives beyond the frontier.
Neither Khoi nor San labels refer to concrete tribes, but rather broad way of life references, pastoralist & hunters. *The ancestors of today's Africans.*
"khoisan" is a 20th century ficticious abstraction by Schulze. It's ahistoric.
Khoi = pastoralists. (Khwe)
San was reference to those leading hunter-gatherer way of life.
Bantu isn't a singular group of people either, nor proto-bantu/proto-agrarians millennia ago on the continent, but *in the SA context* refers to linguistic dialect category of evolved native modern click languages or agro-pastoralism in tool.
XHOSA, is a concrete modern polity named after a then minor ascendant agro-pastoralist native HOUSE (House named after an individual, later on forming a large umbrella nation).
The agro-pastoralist house being in a stronger position to organise & resist the Dutch, the hunter-gatherer & pastoralist natives of the Cape *banded together* under this house and formed today's large umbrella nation called XHOSA, pushed out along the Eastward-expanding Cape Colony frontier, into the frontier naative reserve.
From the 1700s to the late 1800s they then fought the intermittent hundred-years war/frontier war (with many also being labour of the colony).
*The SA native has been a blend of ancient pygmy and proto-agrarian for millennia, and that is who Europeans found.*
A pity our corrupt government has retarded south Africa's progress, we should be enjoying an abundant life for everyone,(peace,prosperity and racial harmony).
We would have been the bread basket of the world
100 %
Then and now 🤣🤣🤣 a black men hasn't seen any difference alteast now he can use any toilet he likes 🤣🤣🤣🤣🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
@@dineomolapo9934 typical🤦🏽♂️
You don't have to look at their skin color, they are all freemasons which means they work for London.
*Just what Israel to Palestine!*
*FreePalestine
*FreeUyghur
There are many other laws that were enacted to benefit whites in South Africa
Thank you TRT for this informative video! The former colonial powers don’t teach this kind of historical facts in their schools.
@sami would be polite-instead of spray random insults - to name which countries. I ll be humble enough to be a country thank you. (Don t feel very powerful today)
@@rheijm9201 All countries with a colonial / occupation history: USA, Britain, France, Spain...
@@samit7570 Well, French and Netherlands kids get taught history. Accurate. They are democratic countries..France and Netherlands are not North Korea and Afghanistan, for your info. They have average to good education.
@@rheijm9201 I've heard from my dutch friend that the colonial and slavery history are only brushed over and swept under the rug at school
Trt is best news channel, informing us about the world events and educating us about the history in their small, precise and accurate videos
Actually, it’s a middle man engulfed in the business of spreading fallacious propaganda to the Turkish people. Also, they should fire this narrator, her English is abhorrently terrible.
Trt is not educating at all but spreading lies
Trt is not educating at all but spreading lies
@Akhtar Miah everything
Greetings from India
so is apartheid not brought to South Africa by British people, but by the descendants of Dutch people??
Izzy vs dricus brought me here
My South African brothers and sisters still they sleep they didn’t move them back to Europe
But I hope when time they will wake up 🆙
@mkeufish no is a reality what joke you talking about white men 🤔
If they go back than african Americans should go back too
@@joshr24 America isn’t yours you aren’t originally people from there Even you know you belong only Europe
@@x-isaac3385 if you can’t defend it, then it isn’t yours anymore.
@@joshr24 even you
They left out the part where Britain forces the colony to stop all slave trading by force from 1801 onwards
The British still employed slave like tactics to their foreign laborers, especially the Indians who couldn't return home and faced brutal conditions under the British boot. Ending "Slavery" was in name only, not in action.
Another name for slavery is called Indentured laborers.... any way people are not stupid anymore by giving their lands to the colonizers for a handful of broken beads and a cracked mirror😂😂. Divide and rule was their motto.. ... sit back and giggle while they caused conflict between brothers...
From 1801 onwards they were call indentured labourers 😂😂 just ask the Indians of. K z n . They know the full story ..dont rely on Rudyard Kipling 😂😂😂😂
I’m primarily Ghanaian but had some Dutch ancestors who built South Africa
They didn't build south africa the black people did cause they were forced via slavery just like in America white people did not build America slaves did
South Africa the country is a Dutch British colony
Amazing reporting.. 👌🏼👌🏼👍🏼♥️♥️♥️
The first freedom fighters were the Cape Malay , The makassarese, Javanese ,Malay , Bugis, Maluku and Sumbawan royals and political exiles and VOC resisters were all banished there/ The people from the Gowa Sultanate in Makssar, Mataram Sultanate, Cirebon, Banten and Malaka sulatanate were all banish by Dutch VOC criminals
Great little video… summarized history accurately.Thank you 🙏
I still don't get it. How can a group whose share was less than 10% enslaved the 90% ?
When you have East India company behind you and Technology of that time you can murder people and subject them to slavery you know
The Africans were not one group, it was different tribes scattered all over and also very hostile with each other. The white men simply conquered them tribe by tribe, maybe if the tribes were united, we would be talking about history that's completely different than what it is now.
Natural Selection.
10% had brain full of information while 90% was climbing the trees.
This is happening in Israel.
"Land that does not belong to them" is such a silly sentence to me especially when you look at the expanse of history and the migration of people. Should people not leave their boarders? Life's a competition and nothing belongs to anyone, it can be taken and you have to fight for it or take it for yourself. Things ebb and flow, from around 1500-present the west has dominated, before that other regions had a moment in the sun. Other regions success is what drove European's to pursue colonisation for a better life, its' just how history goes fam
Europe dominated between 1750 to 1950, in the 1500's Spain couldn't take Algiers with 40,000 men.
@@Zakariya3603 well Adolph I can assume you potentially agree with the other stuff I’ve said so I’ll take that as a win
@@Zakariya3603 hope you keep the same energy when Europe and America is finally overrun by immigration.
@@lukesmhudson Hope you say the same about Africans and Arabs entering Europe
@@captain4595 The way I see it the land of Europe doesn’t belong to Europeans they just exist there right now and will do for however long they can continue to maintain their control over the territory. Is it in European interests to let in certain people from outside the region? Probably not. Not if they want to maintain the society they’ve created - a society which is amongst the most successful in history. However, if you’re African or Arab and you want a better life for yourself of course you’re going to try making a go of it in Europe, and you can’t be mad at that.
Good speech brother 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👏👏👏👏
TRT world
I learn here, what I dont learn at school....sad...
Then the Dutch...British....Spanish.....Portuguese.....and French arrived ....we know how it's gonna end....NO BUENO. hahaha
It's sounds like, seem like PALESTINIAN.
FREE PALESTINIAN LAND AND PEOPLE.
When palestin will be free then palestinians treat the settlers like how European settlers (jews) treat Palestinians. one day 👍🤣
So they just do this everywhere they go huh 🤔
The arrival of Jan van Riebeeck and his people led to centuries of development in South Africa. Make a video on the brutal murders of farmers who supplies food for South Africa.
I love Cape Town a lot.....
Being black (African and or colored) is difficult
sadly yes
coloured?
Where is Dricus due Plessis now? the so called "African" 😂😂.
2022 and nothing has changed.
The colonization of Anatolia which was Greek and the ethnic cleansing of “Native” Armenians & Assyrians in eastern Anatolia is the only colonization of Anatolia which was the fall on May 29, 1453.
This will be rectified in the coming years.
What about when Greeks colonized Anatolia when it was inhabited by Hittites, Luwians, Phrygians, etc.?
@@sarban1653there was no ancient Greece or Armenia, get it, it is another failed zionist European colonial project just like israhell, they couldn't do it, they financed foreigners from the Balkans and Caucasus to colonize the collapsing ottoman empire to create a Christian land that follows the orders of European powers , but the Muslims destroyed the terrorists who called themselves Armenians and Greeks, it failed, they are still trying it, Palestine and the zionist European colonial project there was successful because there were only a few Palestinians, but in turkey we outnumbered the zionist hellenists and armenoids when we fought back they had literally no chance. There is a reason why you will find so many Armenians and Greeks outside of their supposed homelands, it's a european project, they never existed before.
Please look up Thomas Sowell
This is the problem and colonizers now they say they are Africans it's their land
No. Bantus were not in South Africa when white people arrived. Bantus arrived later and the Bantus persecuted the indigenous people far worse that whites ever did.
Africa is still BLACK land thats all we're saying, it doesnt matter when a white colonizers came , still doesnt naturally belong to them
That’s a lie Bantu people were there way before whites when white people arrived they found many black ethnic dominating each province and started off by trading with the native groups to then starting wars to take their land . With your statement explain which groups are Native to KZN-Zulus, Eastern Cape- Xhosa,Free state- Sotho,Western Cape- Khoisan and more which means that you clearly don’t know South Africa’s backstory and as a black individual I have no hatred to white people in South Africa I just believe that native groups deserve what belongs to them especially land as many people try to act like there wasn’t a land act that forced people of colour to move away from fertile and reduced the ownership of natives owning their own land. 80% of South Africa is black but less than blacks own less than 5% of the land. Which whites,coloureds and Indians own more land even though none of them make 10 percent of population and not to forget apartheid making it hard for black people to get proper education and jobs. Plus bantu groups like Zulu,Xhosa,Sotho and more ethnic groups are native to South Africa just that the Khoisan came before them plus when the bantu groups arrived no white people existed in South Africa when you use common sense you realise that Africa is native Arabs and Black people mainly being black people so how would a race from Europe come before an African race just like how Europe is indigenous to white people so how would black people arrive there before whites.
@@NCB_music No. The people who were there before Europeans arrived were not Bantus. Bantus arrived as colonisers and they brutally persecuted the indigenous people.
Sorry but you fed black nationalist lies.
@@suburbanyobbo9412 😂My guy white people come from Europe black people come from Africa how would a white person have came to Africa before black people?
@@suburbanyobbo9412 Plus the dna of a Khoisan is majority black and like I said black groups were in other provinces in South Africa which you couldn’t even answer my question to how that was the case. The only thing that makes Khoi people African is because they have black/african DNA in them. Ruined it for all the native South African groups with wars like Anglo-Zulu war, Great Cape war and many Xhosa frontier wars just that you don’t know history plus name one war against Nguni people and Khoisan this time don’t ignore the question.
Look how much better off the country was with apartheid. Clean, orderly, less crime, prosperous.
Who ask you to do it? Whites stole the resources, and they kept the no-white people at a disadvantage.
@@relacionar111 No. They nurtured and developed the resources of the land to turn it into a modern wealthy country. Where you at today? Same land, same indigenous tribes. Your society is inferior in every way. I don't need to be asked, I can see if. Long live Rhodesia!
@@evilchaperone You're extremely d3ns3! Wh1tes committed g3n0cid3 against blacks and looted tons of wealth & resources from them, which are serious cr1m3s against humanity. In fact, wh1tes are actually 1nferi0r in every way, especially when it comes to humanity. I'm sure you're an ultra pro-Wh1te and anti-Bl@ck troll. Lol
When the white man arrived... Says it all.
Stop using the white man's technology then...
Good job TRT,thanks for this video, 💞
Thank you for telling South African history
1:15 As well as India. A quarter of all slaves came from South Asia (more than from Southeast Asia). "Malabar", "Pondicherry", "Ceylon", "Cochin", "Goa" and many other place names show up in records naming enslaved people.
British Malabar and cochin are part of modern Kerala state, India🇮🇳
Where did the other three quarters come from?
@@sarban1653 From highest percentages to lowest: East Africa, Madagascar, Indonesia and West Africa
@@mnmeskc848 Thanks. Do you have any source so I can read more? I'm interested in the topic of the Indian Ocean Slave Trade.
@@sarban1653 can only think of some authors who've written on the slave trade and slavery in South Africa specifically: Robert Ross, Gabeba Baderoon, Pumla Ggola, Nigel Worden, Robert Shell.
This is actually a brilliant little video
Ww1 indian army ⟬⟭💜
Good one! Now make a quick review of Asian colonialism and the mess it created in the Balkans.
The same thing that’s happening to them happened to blacks ancestors…I hate this tick for tac society…we have not learned form our ancestors
Thank you.
Ya, south Africa is much better off now RIGHT.
100X
Why dont you do a segment on "When the Ottomans arrived" or "when the Arabs arrived" I understand its trendy to criticise the White Man (as you put it) but how about some education on all sorts of colonialism. Colonialism was a part of history, that extended from ALL empires, not only Europeans! Remove your racist title of "When the White Man Arrived", it sets a horrible precedent and fuels a negative fire that helps no one! If you'd like to inform people on the history of nations, states, geopolitics, etc... by all means go ahead. But do your job and inform the people, do not look to establish an unnecessary underlining agenda to hate the white man.
Told from the perspective of the Armenians?
@I wish every1 is happy 1day."If i don't steal Cyprus, someone else (Greek state) will."
-Turkey 1974
Germany "Inv*ding a small country to protect the "oppressed" German minority therefore Germany expelled them and replaced them with Germans." Does this remind you of something?
The same excuse the Turks used to inv*de and steal 36% of Cyprus and replace 100k expelled Greek Cypriots with mainland Turkish settlers.
Turkey expelled many Greeks between 1923-1960s
Imagine if Greece inv*ded 36% of Turkey because of the Greeks Turkey expelled in 1964 and many times before (way after the 1923 population exchange)
Also, they did a wonderful job of neglecting to mention the fact that Shaka himself displaced many African tribes himself during the Mfecane. But because he wasn't white, that tends to not be an issue.
Filtering history through the lens of race instead of merely recognizing that race played a part leads to a skewed view thereof.
they have every right to be angry and say what they want because at the end of the day, the people at the disadvantage in society, simply because of their skin color is them, not the white man.
Stfu cry baby. Silva, you sound pathetic…
I wish more south africans watch this video so they can learn that people who claim to be indigenous to this country are actually from east Africa
Very interesting video, but please SLOW DOWN so I can understand and let it sink in...!
Great to find out about my ancestors from South Africa
Crazy how south africa experienced this then thought "oh let's do this exact this to another country" 👎🏽
The Sans got it from all ends from Khois, Bantus, Xhosas(Even though those groups are also Native to the African continent but still), Europeans, Desis, South East Asians, And Coulereds yeah
Stealing land?!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
Bantus didn't even owned western cape
It’s the same with colonialism of America the now former ‘new world’. America’s apartheid has been blatantly ignored. For decades.
Allahuekbeer 🤲🏾
im American born and raised in nyc my son did a dna test and inherited all of this from me east asia AND south african AND AULSTRALIAN DNA OR SOMETHING AS WELL AS ALOT OF STUFF I COULDNT EXPLAIN BUT LOOKING AT MY MOM LOL I TOLD HIM I WOULDNT BE SURPRISED WHAT YOU MIGHT FIND. SO NOW I HAVE SOMETHING TO TELL HIM THAT YOU. I HAVE MORE SOUTH AND EAST AFRICAN THAN WESTBUT HOW THE HELL DID I GET HERE IF ITS TRUE AND HE WASNT ELIGIBLE FOR A AFRICAN DNA BECAUSE MY MALE LINE GOESE TO AMERICA AND ENGLAND AND IM A BLACK MAN BUT 15% OF MY DNA FROM MY MOM COMES FROM THE HETHERLANDS MAKES SENSE NOW AND THEY STATE EAST AND ENDED UP ON THE BERREN STRAIT BECAUSE THERE IS NATIVE AMERICAN DNA 6% 1% OF WHICH IS INUIT
BUT IAM MOSTLY BLACK LOL
A lot of conflicting information and even more conveniently redacted to paint the Boer's in a bad light. Biased and cherry picked details. We'll just ignore the fact that The Bantu's captured and sold more of their own people as slaves than the Boers' ever did. "The Dutch farmers were really unhappy about British rule in the Cape & it led to the great Trek". Why not mention what policy led to that occurring? Slaves were being let FREE. Let's also forget the battle of Blood River and why it happened too. Such a one sided dialogue. Again, the great trek is painted in such a bad light, yet nothing mentioned about when West and North African Bantu's trekked down to South Africa and slaughtered the Khoi for their cattle and land to settle and colonize. Talk about the time frames before mentioning the 'homeland' already being 'founded'. Founded by who exactly? Not the Zulus. There were already Norwegian settlers and Indian slaves in Durban before any of that.
Oh my goodness, your history is so flawed I don't know even where to start to engage it.
Sorry my friend, we don't do racist white washed euro-thieve-land his-story.😉
Cheers🍸
Alot is on point here
A hostile one-sided English view on SA's history.
This means our education has boundaries and is limited we are being kept in the dark thank you for these kind of videos at least now I know
My question is how did the locals let them just take the land
Please learn how to pronounce Xhosa it’s not kosa it’s Xhosa
Part 2 ?
And then Jesus arrived.😢
0.53 The statement made by the narrator is incorrect and ignorant. No land was seized by the Dutch. Only by the British. You need to go look deeper into the cultures of the Khoi, and San to understand what happened. Stop forcing your politically driven misinformation onto people.
This is the bare bones, but very informative.
Our children must be fully informed about our history. The pain l grew up in when seeing my elders harrassed under pass laws made me fear growth knowing that l too would be harrassed the same way. Life was hopeless to a large number of Africans in Apartheid times. The 99. 9 % of whites were so vicious, so arrogant and could not care what becomes of a black people. On the foot of the mountain on N2 road to town we could see Robin lsland and new that our leaders are incarcerated there some for life and we could not say a word about them. There were so many laws to keep us as prisoners in our own country whilst we were said to be free. This history should not be sugarcoated it should be said as it was and nothing else
Apartheid did not come to an end, the British are controlling SA through freemasonry/ politics, the faces are black but the politics are white.
Funny, the blacks in south africa today are replication those same whites that we all hated..isnt that interesting
I was just wanna correct something. The two Boer republics did not have limited independent control sanctioned by the British but were two completely independent republics until the end of the Second Boer War.
Now is no more Boer.. just happy with RanBow Nation, South Africa, all colors are Included.
Did Britain have nothing to do with apartheid? and it was only the descendants of Dutch people?
Nobody cares about your parasitic existence there.
It’s so sad what they done to the real South Africans .