EA and DICE could have avoided the enormous hate that this game received at the beginning if only we had all the content they gave us to update it these 3 years from day 1. It wouldn't be "the definitive" solution but "better than nothing" i guess...
releasing a shooter without a scoreboard. They had no idea what they were doing. This was never gonna be good, no chance. They don't understand basic shooter mechanics, let alone know what makes Battlefield great.
@@HecklemysheckelDebatable. The annoyng part is how instant it is, especially like changing barrels and ammunition type. It should play an animation that incapacitates your rifle for a second, so that you need to be more aware of your surroundings
Battlefield V had a rough start but it became a pretty good game afterwards... Can somebody tell me if the same happened to Battlefield 2042 or is it still trash?
BFV was and forever will be complete garbage. Literally nothing could've made that game better, not even if you added 50 maps and 50 weapons and 50 new vehicles.
Not in my region, in asia. BFV, BF1 and 2042 still dominating the region. Full lobby in BF3 and BF4 is basically not exist. The last time i find full lobby in BF4, was full with bots so its appear to be full but in reality it only had a few players.
I play crossplay. on xbox. I hate no server browser. But I'm about as good as this as console games. The game wasn't that great. And only sweaties play it now. Likely you don't play it that much cause of various reasons. But on a populated game you could probably hold your own
@@fishtailfuture I played it a lot the first few years and, apart from some portal servers, it lost its appeal. I started playing HLL instead but went back recently to play a few times & it was full of sweaty squads annihilating everyone not in organised teams.
I made my own Easter egg. Heres how it works: in the warzone menu, you need to click each corner in a anti clockwise matter. Once you have done that, you will play a game of duck hunt, and you need to get 500 points maximum and lose after you got 500 points. Soon you need to go to the map and go to each corner (any way you want), and you need to destroy 5 arcade machines with a shotgun on each corner. Now heres the tricky part. You need to go in the middle of the map and wait for 5 minutes exactly for a hole to teleport you in this big room. Now you need to do this button puzzle. There are 10 buttons, and you need to press 1, 9, 9, 0. Then when you're done, you're rewarded with the zapper!.. Its power is that its really fast, has no recoil, and if you hit someone, it flashes a black screen revealing each player with a white box marking them. You can also one shot them if you hit them in the head. The only disadvantage you have is the 3 bullets.
Idk man, you should be laying hidden prone in some snow somewhere and be patient like a real sniper if you’re wearing snow camo, not running around, defeats the whole snow camo getup
Idk if there were balance changes to bf5 from start to now, but the game has felt the same the entire time it's been out. It's my favorite battlefield game and I wish there was still support for it.
Ofcourse they know were you at. You got a flashlight on your pistol and standing next to a wreck and on top of that the glint from the scope. Besides that I do enjoy your vids as in always.
Agreed. 2042 is actually a pretty good game now. Especially if you dont go into it expecting it to give you the same feeling battlefield 4 did in its prime. The playerbase killed this game, not ea or dice.
@@stringzzzzzthe game is not pretty good and it especially was not when it first released, which is the main problem. For a major release being "pretty good" after 3 years of updates is horrendous. The 128 player maps were a very bad decision. Way too big. Less detail in the maps and less destruction (for obvious reasons, they couldn't keep up the same level of detail/destruction with naps double the size). Very buggy in the beginning. People expected something great and were served somethin below average so it's not a surprise it got hated and never recovered from that. For me it never felt like a BF game bit like another studio TRYING to make a BF game and failing at it. I have high hopes for the next release though, looks promising so far.
@@stringzzzzz partially, maybe. I always blamed old Dice "CandyCrush" management for the whole thing. But community and Dice themselves aren't exactly innocent
@@klodd5328 It is pretty good. BF4 on release and during first year was a complete dumpster fire. Even now it's a bloated mess with bad quality content that miracously got the best technical support in the series. BF2042 was pretty good after first year too. So I don't know how they differ apart from people arguying over "how it feels" 128 wasn't a bad decision. It was executed poorly. Because of old gen consoles and lack of quality control. Give Dice more time and proper QA, 128 would not feel any different from 64 version. It did recover. It might not be the most popular game, but constant updates and prolonged support (still continuing and the longest in the series) had a good effect on playerbase. Which is your opinion. Mostly wrong too. 2042 is the closest any of modern BF games came to the fun I've had in BF3. Hardline is close second
@@thebigsam yes it is my opinion. So it can't be "mostly wrong" since it's an opinion and subjective. I didn't state it as a fact. And I can get behind some of the things you said. But I still don't believe 128 player maps are and will be a good idea. That's why they won't do it in their next release. You can't have the same level of detail, destruction and immersion as you had in BF1 (which was a great factor for its success) on a 128 player map, that is double the size and double the players. Not with today's technological possibilities. It just doesn't look and doesn't feel like war, it feels like an arcade shooter. If you like it, cool that's nice for you. I did not and will never come back to it. I'll wait for the new title and hope they've learnt from the previous disasters..
EA can revive this game all it wants there's no bringing it back But your worst to best series never died in the first place which means that you need to rank all bf1 operations from worst to best 😍
Especially BF5, which could have honestly been a great game. Add some iconic WW2 maps, Stalingrad and Berlin for example (and like 5-10 more). Balance it out a little, maybe add a few weapons as well. The core gameplay is great, the gunplay is the best in all of BF games. The problem is the lack of content imo
Man. I wish I had better CPU than the game requires to have similar experience like you did. Also the map looks so nice It would be perfect for singeplayer campaign If the game had any.
Tried to play a quick 64 round. got into one that was over. 5 min later, got into the same map. played it. ended after 10min. got in another game that was 3/4 over. ended after a couple minutes. Got into a full round, same map as the first one. lasted 10min. then was out of time. "played" for 45 min. didn't get in one good round really. If there are no server browser on next BF, I swear I won't buy it. It is my number one priority. I will not waste 45 min of my life for 10-15 min of decent gameplay.
Battlefield 2042 looks cool at first with the crispy graphics but then I see things like the operator system or AI soldiers and remember why it flopped lol. I hope DICE can get their sht together for the next Battlefield and make a new masterpiece like BF4 or BF1
They need to get back on battle FRONT. We have enough battlefield games already. As long as they keep microtransactions out the game has the potential to bring in millions.
@@pestscheinexactly. Don't support corporate greed, I don't care how much they did in the last 3 years or so after the state it was released in. It was an insult to the players and fans of the franchise. Should not be supported. I mainly play BF1, servers are still full and I have a lot of fun.
I got a bf 2042 key for like five bucks some days ago.... and i must admit..... not a bad battlefield! I always just heard all the hate and was put off... But of course the release and some of Dice's decisions were more than questionable ;)
Now after 3 years it's playable and not too bad of a game. Which should not be the standard and I appreciate that many people just rejected it completely. Don't support corporate greed, make them bleed for releasing half finished, buggy, non conceptualised games. Even if they try to improve it afterwards when they notice they messed up.
@@klodd5328just to remind you bf4 which is now considered one of the best if not the best bf game had very rough launch and they fixed it after many patches and yet people still claim this game to be great Now rises the question which game is better: the one that started good and remained good or the one that started poorly and became good or even great after some time
@@albanskigangster the thing is that BF2042 has many flaws in its core design, that can and will not be fixed. The biggest issue imo is/was the 128 player map focus. You can't have double the amount of players on maps twice as large with the same level of detail and destruction that made BF such a beloved franchise. It just wouldn't run on the same hardware that previously only had to process half of what would be necessary now. Upscaling is a pest in gaming imo. For me BF1 was the greatest of them, I've played a lot of BF3, BF4 honestly not so much. I am just fed up with game studios releasing half baked games and I will never pre-order a game and when a game releases in a state like BF2042 I will not care to play it ever, no matter how much money and time they pour into it to make it playable/good/great. If we as gamers would collectively do that, game studios would get punished so bad for releasing games in alpha/beta stage as full priced finished products, that they would start releasing games again where you can feel that they're made with love and passion. You have to force the change, not accept defeat. I don't wanna be a play tester and having to pay for it anymore.
@@klodd5328 can't discuss with being fed up with companies giving half finished products As for me the only game I ever preordered was lies of p and can't complain bout it release state so some games still can be more than playable on launch And as of forcing a change then I doubt it can be possible in all companies like ya know there is plenty of CoD fanboys that buy new game every year and every arcade FPS (I use term arcade to every not tactical based/milsim shooter) have to compete with CoD (of course playerbases for CoD and bf are quite different but I knew some people myself included that like to play both from time to time and also companies care only bout money so they will try to attract other players) so I'm really not sure if there ever will be any online fps game that will be released in complete state(heard BO6 is in quite good state atm so maybe I had too rough opinion on activision after IW......and then after vanguard......and then after releasing 2 reboot MW games year to year)
The game looks fun to play and mess around in now but it still feels like they’re trying to be too many things in one game. Also the bots don’t help either, if you can’t have 128 live players in a server, don’t make the servers that big.
This game is bad. One of the most boring Battlefield titles ever released. It’s just so meh. The “community” got its modern Battlefield with this title but it sucked so bad that they whined for another one and now DICE is falling all over themselves to make sure people know the new one will be just like BF3/4. It’s pathetic.
@@helium5912I know but the premise of a near future game could have been so good but they had operators, no campaign, and tons of other things that made bf2042 more like call of duty than battlefield
@Raccoon_speaking_giberish cod has a campaign. And its actually playable. BF is dead. The only thing that can save it is to bring back titles like BFV and BF1. That was peak BF.
EA and DICE could have avoided the enormous hate that this game received at the beginning if only we had all the content they gave us to update it these 3 years from day 1.
It wouldn't be "the definitive" solution but "better than nothing" i guess...
releasing a shooter without a scoreboard. They had no idea what they were doing.
This was never gonna be good, no chance. They don't understand basic shooter mechanics, let alone know what makes Battlefield great.
Kills people with remote control rocket. Proceeds to exclaim surprise when killed with... you guess it, remote control rocket launcher.
"EA tries to Revive Battlefield 2042"
TBAG> "That's AI ,That's AI That's AI That's AI "
TBAG running deagle with flashlight and be like how do they know where i am lol
Also - using 6x scope, clearly not realizing 5x and up have scope glint.
The only two positives 2042 gave us:
-Attachments on the fly.
-A lesson.
Attachments on the fly is dumb imo.
@@HecklemysheckelIt is, but at least its fun
@@HecklemysheckelDebatable. The annoyng part is how instant it is, especially like changing barrels and ammunition type. It should play an animation that incapacitates your rifle for a second, so that you need to be more aware of your surroundings
lmao, attachments on the fly is what most BF players don't want. Positive? Is batman flying positive too?
Reply 5
6:05 some random Russian t-80 crew:
Haha, also T72B3 and T90M
😂😂😂
Imagine having a thermal scope and thinking the enemy hasn't one
Damn, I thought the "0" in 2042 was a "1" and got really excited for a sec
I picked up BF1 and BF2042 on steam sale this was best/worst money spent
BF1 is still so good
@@mateo1726 Few games immersed me well like this title
@@DootNoot kingdome come is one of most immersive games for me, not shooter but give it a try when there's steam sale
You didnt get bf5?! 0_O
I am very happy to see a video game included back blast and is bringing awareness to how dangerous it is.
friendly reminder to smack your team noob when they inevitably backblast you
Still waiting on bfv end of round themes worst to best
Tbag plz
Remember guys, we lost BFV to this game.
BFV is horrible
@@TheWhiteWolf_bf2lm1you’re tweaking
@@TheWhiteWolf_bf2lm1 i agree bfv sucks so much
@@jasaiahacevedo7689cap
i wish they gave us winter war or paris dlc before they cancelled service
Battlefield V had a rough start but it became a pretty good game afterwards... Can somebody tell me if the same happened to Battlefield 2042 or is it still trash?
Its still garbage. Its fun as an arcade shooter, but its nothing like old battlefields.
BFV was and forever will be complete garbage. Literally nothing could've made that game better, not even if you added 50 maps and 50 weapons and 50 new vehicles.
@@CommanderLongJohnfinally someone with some sense.
@@CommanderLongJohn I disagree
@@dankengine5304 Its literally the best Battlefield you can play when it comes to gameplay / movement wise.
I see more players and lobbies on Battlefield 4 than this game on the daily. Its hilarious.
Not in my region, in asia. BFV, BF1 and 2042 still dominating the region. Full lobby in BF3 and BF4 is basically not exist. The last time i find full lobby in BF4, was full with bots so its appear to be full but in reality it only had a few players.
@@mamons_2339 i think that dude just dont understand the server browser in Battlefield 2042, and that it not shows you all servers(lobbys) ;)
I love BF4 but that's just plain wrong, I hardly see 10 full servers on a wk evening on playstation
BF4 best Battlefield ❤
@@mamons_2339 same region and same experience, wanna try at least 1 BF4 match but it's impossible
A NON SPONSORED TBAG VIDEO 😦?!!?!?!?!?!
Q4 is pretty busy for me with those things.. sorry about that😅
I will get back to my regular scheduled content very soon :)
@ get the bag bro💪 gotta pay that rent somehow😄 (you’re my fav gaming RUclipsr btw,love ur videos)
They’re just recycling the Portal content into the main game. All this ‘new stuff’ has been in the game since launch
We never had Night versions of Bulge and Alamein, are you tweaking?
@@thebigsamthey went in the code and changed a value for the lighting this isn't a new map.
@@EruditeFeline a single button press obviously. I assume a real game developer like you would know
2042 way too sweaty for anyone playing console with the cross play
With the correct controller settings you can mop pc players. I do it all the time.
I play crossplay. on xbox. I hate no server browser. But I'm about as good as this as console games. The game wasn't that great. And only sweaties play it now. Likely you don't play it that much cause of various reasons. But on a populated game you could probably hold your own
@@fishtailfuture I played it a lot the first few years and, apart from some portal servers, it lost its appeal. I started playing HLL instead but went back recently to play a few times & it was full of sweaty squads annihilating everyone not in organised teams.
I made my own Easter egg. Heres how it works: in the warzone menu, you need to click each corner in a anti clockwise matter. Once you have done that, you will play a game of duck hunt, and you need to get 500 points maximum and lose after you got 500 points. Soon you need to go to the map and go to each corner (any way you want), and you need to destroy 5 arcade machines with a shotgun on each corner. Now heres the tricky part. You need to go in the middle of the map and wait for 5 minutes exactly for a hole to teleport you in this big room. Now you need to do this button puzzle. There are 10 buttons, and you need to press 1, 9, 9, 0. Then when you're done, you're rewarded with the zapper!..
Its power is that its really fast, has no recoil, and if you hit someone, it flashes a black screen revealing each player with a white box marking them. You can also one shot them if you hit them in the head. The only disadvantage you have is the 3 bullets.
the ai players should be robots so you can tell the difference, in a 1v2 it'd be wise to prioritize the real player and it could help with immersion
BO1 menu music hits perfectly hard
0:35 i wish sniper rifles had light terrain piercing, this has happened to me one to many times.
Metal gear solid 2 song blasting on the background while stealthly kills everyone
Killed by back blast.
Pause.
5:48 scope glint buddy
6:56 The UT '99 menu music never gets old
I can't find the name of this sample 😢
sounds pretty similar but its not Unreal Tournament ;)
@@TBAG Wha? Not a remix? Ok now I need to know!?!
@@HampnieHambart6 it's actually the rendezvous soundtrack from 007: Nightfire :)
@@TBAG ah yes, thanks!
Love your vids man
In hadcore mode camouflage cannot be changed🤣 will always be the default. Only on weapon.
Bo1 music 10/10 taste 🤝🏼
Would be sneaky if there was no sniper glint on that big ass optic
Still cant get a game on either of those 2 severs.
2 videos in a day? oh you've outdone yourself TBAG
Idk man, you should be laying hidden prone in some snow somewhere and be patient like a real sniper if you’re wearing snow camo, not running around, defeats the whole snow camo getup
Idk if there were balance changes to bf5 from start to now, but the game has felt the same the entire time it's been out. It's my favorite battlefield game and I wish there was still support for it.
I seriously hope they continue updated this game. Its actually a lot of fun now...
Havent played since they added actual classes to the game and I can see im not missing out on much lol
The only reason i even had owned bf2042 was for the portal
god damn it tbag couldn't you have waited like a day or 2 so I could upload my own video about it lmao
Emagine being spotted by the stupid sniper glint
Ofcourse they know were you at. You got a flashlight on your pistol and standing next to a wreck and on top of that the glint from the scope. Besides that I do enjoy your vids as in always.
bf turned into 'hardcore' zombie mode 😑
I love reading TBAG's comment section, because it's just a more stupid echo chamber than BF subreddits are
Agreed. 2042 is actually a pretty good game now. Especially if you dont go into it expecting it to give you the same feeling battlefield 4 did in its prime. The playerbase killed this game, not ea or dice.
@@stringzzzzzthe game is not pretty good and it especially was not when it first released, which is the main problem. For a major release being "pretty good" after 3 years of updates is horrendous.
The 128 player maps were a very bad decision. Way too big. Less detail in the maps and less destruction (for obvious reasons, they couldn't keep up the same level of detail/destruction with naps double the size). Very buggy in the beginning.
People expected something great and were served somethin below average so it's not a surprise it got hated and never recovered from that.
For me it never felt like a BF game bit like another studio TRYING to make a BF game and failing at it. I have high hopes for the next release though, looks promising so far.
@@stringzzzzz partially, maybe. I always blamed old Dice "CandyCrush" management for the whole thing. But community and Dice themselves aren't exactly innocent
@@klodd5328 It is pretty good.
BF4 on release and during first year was a complete dumpster fire. Even now it's a bloated mess with bad quality content that miracously got the best technical support in the series. BF2042 was pretty good after first year too. So I don't know how they differ apart from people arguying over "how it feels"
128 wasn't a bad decision. It was executed poorly. Because of old gen consoles and lack of quality control. Give Dice more time and proper QA, 128 would not feel any different from 64 version.
It did recover. It might not be the most popular game, but constant updates and prolonged support (still continuing and the longest in the series) had a good effect on playerbase.
Which is your opinion. Mostly wrong too. 2042 is the closest any of modern BF games came to the fun I've had in BF3. Hardline is close second
@@thebigsam yes it is my opinion. So it can't be "mostly wrong" since it's an opinion and subjective. I didn't state it as a fact.
And I can get behind some of the things you said. But I still don't believe 128 player maps are and will be a good idea. That's why they won't do it in their next release.
You can't have the same level of detail, destruction and immersion as you had in BF1 (which was a great factor for its success) on a 128 player map, that is double the size and double the players. Not with today's technological possibilities.
It just doesn't look and doesn't feel like war, it feels like an arcade shooter.
If you like it, cool that's nice for you. I did not and will never come back to it. I'll wait for the new title and hope they've learnt from the previous disasters..
EA can revive this game all it wants there's no bringing it back
But your worst to best series never died in the first place which means that you need to rank all bf1 operations from worst to best 😍
Remember, they killed Battlefront 2 on its peak for this...
So many hero’s and villains and classes in this game The could’ve made swbf2 one of the best Star Wars games
Battlemid 2
@@Wild_B_Kelso I’ll let the slide 🛝
Both EA Battlefronts are terrible and no amount of updates could fix the fact that the core gameplay is shallow and repetitive.
Especially BF5, which could have honestly been a great game. Add some iconic WW2 maps, Stalingrad and Berlin for example (and like 5-10 more). Balance it out a little, maybe add a few weapons as well. The core gameplay is great, the gunplay is the best in all of BF games. The problem is the lack of content imo
Bring back platoons and battlelog
5:41 Are you playing against PC players?
you should make a video on getting all achievements or at least the rest you have yet to complete for bf1 since you did it for 2042
Man. I wish I had better CPU than the game requires to have similar experience like you did. Also the map looks so nice It would be perfect for singeplayer campaign If the game had any.
BO1 theme is a banger
Tried to play a quick 64 round. got into one that was over. 5 min later, got into the same map. played it. ended after 10min. got in another game that was 3/4 over. ended after a couple minutes. Got into a full round, same map as the first one. lasted 10min. then was out of time. "played" for 45 min. didn't get in one good round really. If there are no server browser on next BF, I swear I won't buy it. It is my number one priority. I will not waste 45 min of my life for 10-15 min of decent gameplay.
I still play BF1. Still so fun to play.
Idk what my problem is but theres no one else ever online
Why go back when B1 is poppin all day every day
Battlefield 2042 looks cool at first with the crispy graphics but then I see things like the operator system or AI soldiers and remember why it flopped lol. I hope DICE can get their sht together for the next Battlefield and make a new masterpiece like BF4 or BF1
Maybe you shouldve turn the light of the Deagle off
They need to get back on battle FRONT. We have enough battlefield games already. As long as they keep microtransactions out the game has the potential to bring in millions.
Why!? I want battlefield 5 back
We lost sw bf2 to this game…
I wont fall for this. It will never be back on my pc again.
This hardcore gamemode is actually enjoyable. Atleast in El alamein
@ no man... bf2042 was just a big insult. I dont care anymore what they are doing. Better stick to BFV
@@pestscheinexactly. Don't support corporate greed, I don't care how much they did in the last 3 years or so after the state it was released in. It was an insult to the players and fans of the franchise. Should not be supported. I mainly play BF1, servers are still full and I have a lot of fun.
bro.. how tf does this guy have no recoil 0:35
Bipod
That thumbnail looks like the church on the map infection from bo3 frfr
Loadout?
not only does AI make this game worse, it's also necessary because no one is playing this game
T-Bag the camo you chose doesn't count, in game seems everybody is in tier 1 by default 🤔
I got a bf 2042 key for like five bucks some days ago.... and i must admit..... not a bad battlefield!
I always just heard all the hate and was put off...
But of course the release and some of Dice's decisions were more than questionable ;)
Now after 3 years it's playable and not too bad of a game. Which should not be the standard and I appreciate that many people just rejected it completely.
Don't support corporate greed, make them bleed for releasing half finished, buggy, non conceptualised games. Even if they try to improve it afterwards when they notice they messed up.
@@klodd5328just to remind you bf4 which is now considered one of the best if not the best bf game had very rough launch and they fixed it after many patches and yet people still claim this game to be great
Now rises the question which game is better: the one that started good and remained good or the one that started poorly and became good or even great after some time
@@albanskigangster the thing is that BF2042 has many flaws in its core design, that can and will not be fixed. The biggest issue imo is/was the 128 player map focus. You can't have double the amount of players on maps twice as large with the same level of detail and destruction that made BF such a beloved franchise. It just wouldn't run on the same hardware that previously only had to process half of what would be necessary now. Upscaling is a pest in gaming imo.
For me BF1 was the greatest of them, I've played a lot of BF3, BF4 honestly not so much.
I am just fed up with game studios releasing half baked games and I will never pre-order a game and when a game releases in a state like BF2042 I will not care to play it ever, no matter how much money and time they pour into it to make it playable/good/great.
If we as gamers would collectively do that, game studios would get punished so bad for releasing games in alpha/beta stage as full priced finished products, that they would start releasing games again where you can feel that they're made with love and passion. You have to force the change, not accept defeat.
I don't wanna be a play tester and having to pay for it anymore.
@@klodd5328 can't discuss with being fed up with companies giving half finished products
As for me the only game I ever preordered was lies of p and can't complain bout it release state so some games still can be more than playable on launch
And as of forcing a change then I doubt it can be possible in all companies like ya know there is plenty of CoD fanboys that buy new game every year and every arcade FPS (I use term arcade to every not tactical based/milsim shooter) have to compete with CoD (of course playerbases for CoD and bf are quite different but I knew some people myself included that like to play both from time to time and also companies care only bout money so they will try to attract other players) so I'm really not sure if there ever will be any online fps game that will be released in complete state(heard BO6 is in quite good state atm so maybe I had too rough opinion on activision after IW......and then after vanguard......and then after releasing 2 reboot MW games year to year)
@@klodd5328 It's not too bad of a game, but a bad Battlefield game. I don't mind 2042 but it's just boring at this point for me.
Battle of the bulge ha
The game looks fun to play and mess around in now but it still feels like they’re trying to be too many things in one game. Also the bots don’t help either, if you can’t have 128 live players in a server, don’t make the servers that big.
It’s a great game
Not only i have no interest to play 2042, i also lost interest into the next game. I have literally 0 expectations
How dare you put MW2 Music into Battlefield hahaha
Battlefail 2077
Battlefailed
Great game ps5 pro
This game looks like shit.
Your comment is exactly that, shiiiitttt😊
💩
So nothing has changed
They should revive bfV instead
PTFO
ea hates new players bf
is not made for new players
Yikes. This dumpster fire of a game... love letter my lily wite arse.
This game plays like poop still no point of reviving it.
This game is bad. One of the most boring Battlefield titles ever released. It’s just so meh. The “community” got its modern Battlefield with this title but it sucked so bad that they whined for another one and now DICE is falling all over themselves to make sure people know the new one will be just like BF3/4. It’s pathetic.
Battlefront 2 died for this game
Was just thinking where is tbag? why doesn't he post more content and posts one. we want more stuff bruh. put out some gun game on cod and new wz pls
If you die to bacblast that's more of a you problem. Everyone knows you should stay clear of the dude with a bazooka
Nerd.
First
and cringe snipers
Hi T! Just here to say hi, that's all, bye
We lost battlefield 3, 1 for this pile of garbage
no
yoooo
this game will never be good its ass and full of op smg sweats and unemployed pc nerds
This game could have been so cool from the statt
No. Its been trash from the start.
@@helium5912I know but the premise of a near future game could have been so good but they had operators, no campaign, and tons of other things that made bf2042 more like call of duty than battlefield
@Raccoon_speaking_giberish cod has a campaign. And its actually playable. BF is dead. The only thing that can save it is to bring back titles like BFV and BF1. That was peak BF.
5
Fr its impossible to q something else than tdm
First to comment, not first
But ur not...ahaha get fuked. BOZO.
second
🧑🦼➡️
First
second