Like your comment is a revelation.. that's what it means.. The writers knew you would know that every other option leaves everyone dead.. so made the Sherrif say it prophetically.
None of these ending are good. What the fuck was Ubisoft thinking?! A bittersweet ending at the very least would've been fine. But the Father wins in all of these.
Yannkam 212 To each their own I suppose. But I hated this. You tried saving the county from these assholes, who slaughtered and violated people and animals in this 'mission'. And in the end, they win. Even the Father gloated in that one ending he was 'right'.
Kamil Krok a good ending would be one, where jason and lisa kiss and go out together. Now he just saves them and tells them to fuck off as he is changed. The other ending is bad considering that she chose us only to get a baby out of jason. So its bad but not as dark as this
So there is no good ending? You can either : 1. Be brainwashed at the end 2. Be stuck in a bunker with a lunatic and do nothing 3. Walk away Pretty stupid, if you ask me.
TheBeauJOB No, I don't. But this game has multiple endings, and all of them are bad endings. Far Cry 4 had better endings than this, and that is saying something.
Saransh Oberoi makes sense but still...they could have at least hinted about the nuke dropping. Hope this gets a dlc that patches up HOW they nuke even fell there in the first place
Manlalarong Pinoy I prefer the walk away ending. I agree, the nuke ending came out of no where, when first saw it few hours ago on other channel, I was like " WTF, WHY AND HOW?". I feel there must be a hint, u know all those notes and letter in game which barely anyone reads? I think one of them may have an answer like WW3 about to start or something.
Saransh Oberoi totally agree but then we'll have to wait for someone to look for these clues and post it. I would love to but my rig ain't enough to handle it
Why is it that the creators of Far Cry, ever since 3, feel the need to give us less good in their good endings? I mean seriously, what the hell? How did the story go from killing the crap out of crazy cultists to two nukes dropping on the state for some unknown reason? Did the Father steal the nukes? Was America at war a nuclear superpower during the game? This crap literally came out of nowhere
Exactly I think Joseph found Nuclear Warhead at the county and then start creating the cult But since you know where it detonated is it possible to go there maybe defuse it?
I would love a DLC where you play as rook and have to escape Joseph and make it out of Montana yourself and it's more of a horror survival game instead of a farcry game
You know I just realized something, isn't the intro to the game after the events of the game? Like the part with Nick, Mary, and Jerome talking about the cult? If so does that mean that the whole nuke ending really was just a bliss hallucination?
For those confused about the end of the walkaway ending(2nd one in the videos order) the person in the video doesnt have music on I guess but it plays “Only You” which Jacob physcologically hardwired your brain to go on a killing spree(against the resistance/good guys) whenever you hear(the part where you shoot all the people in the Jacob scenes and then you shoot the last by instinct who is Eli
None of the ending are really good, but, hey, did you all forget this is a Farcry game? When have any of the endings actually been good? Most are neutral at best, never "good".
Antoine Davis i wouldn't call what Jason went through in 3 good in the end. Sure he gets to leave with most of the people he came with but..well. depends on the definition of "good". Most lived? Sure. Mentally sound? Debatable.
Far cry 3 can't said it was good ending. Yea Jason probably went home with his friends and brother but he stated how fuck up he is that he lost count home many he killed call himself a monster.
The nuke ending kinda makes sense if you pay attention to watch each of the leaders of Seed's cult says, especially about how shitty our world leaders are, how things are escalating, and how crazy the headlines are getting. It's pretty much our world leaders reaching the point where full-scale nuclear war has been waged and it happens right at the exact moment you resist Joseph for the last time, thus making him "seem" as if he was right all along. It's not god unleashing his wrath upon the world, it's our world leaders pressing their own shiny red button on each other.
The devs fucked themselves over. Basically, the "best" ending is to walk away at the very beginning, which means the "best" ending involves avoiding the entire story. AKA "You want a decent not-fucked-up ending? Don't play the game fuck-face!". The standard endings are a) "bad" (walk away at the end after fighting father Gung Ho for hours then unwillingly kill your friends) and b) "the worst of the fuckin' worst" (God knows how much of the world blew up and you're stuck with the nut job that is Joseph Seed). Kind of a weird situation Ubisoft got themselves into with FC5 and its endings...
Rjeffery14 It's not stupid. It's the way it was meant to end and there were no signs of any sort of good ending, because we don't need a good ending. We're not emotional women on their period watching a drama and crying because of the sad ending.
Rjeffery14.. who said far cry "a game where you survive by killing people and animals to craft shit" was a fun and campy game? if you want a good ending, go play undertale, or my little pony
I just finished the game earlier I put almost 70 hours into this game and I got it the day it cane out lol but this game was beyond amazing and the ending ruined the whole damn game for me
I've said what I said about how I feel about the endings, but then I thought about something. Does every game truly need an ending thats labeled good or bad. Whats truly a good ending or bad ending? Maybe each ending has its own reason as to why it is what it is. Some people (like myself) think both endings are bad, others think the nuke is good because it elimates majority of the cult, yet unfortunately Joseph seed lives, then others consider it a bad ending if you leave and let the cult live on to cause more chaos. Then again, Nuke would be considered bad, because everyone you became close with, dies, and then leaving ending would be considered good because no one dies and there's no big bomb. Is there really a good or bad ending? Because from what I'm seeing, its all about how you, the player, experience the game and how you take in the outcome of your actions. See it as however you like, just remember, should it truly be a labeled ending to games like these?
It depends when you walk away though because when you do it in the beginning, you miss a lot of gameplay but when you do it in the end, the Father still wins because he turns on the radio and it puts you into "slaughter mode" and you kill everyone in the car. So honestly either way its just not a great option
Caleb Holland No, walk away is really good ending. Your soul tried to save friends. What happened next is not your guilt. And we dont know what happened next after Rook heard song. Maybe someone in car survived, maybe NG came and wipe out lunatics.
Wow... all those endings were super depressing. I mean, Far Cry has never been a cheery game, but this one? Joseph wins in all scenarios. he gets to keep doing what he's doing. IDk, can we have a "happy" ending? Joe goes to jail. you can even make dark, like he just starts the cult up again in the prison, but I put in all this work for Hope County for... nothing?
Curse Me Good Pretty much. My question is does the county go up in flames in all the endings or just the one you see it happen in? Either way I have several problems with that, for instance Nick Rye and his wife have their daughter born during the game, which was very touching, but then you remember the "good" ending. Did Nick and his family die? Does Ubisoft do baby killing now? Wait, yes they do, as Joseph himself explained. Another thing is Hurk, is he dead too? He's supposed to appear in every Far Cry game, so is Ubisoft breaking franchise tradition on top of killing babies? Or does this signify the end of Far Cry? If so what a mediocre note to end it on. The gameplay is nice, but the story couldn't be worse.
So let me get this straight: Ending one is a nuclear explosion caused by the cult or by some forigne Nation. Ending two is driving away but once the radio got turned on I think the Silent Protagonist got set into a trance like with that music box & killed everyone in the car. Ending Three (or the secret ending, I think) is getting a warrant to arrest the cult leader but doing so would get you killed, so rather than that happen we just... Walk away & probably got fired. Man, idk if its just me but I don't like this game after seeing the boss fights & the other endings. Sheesh, you'd think at least in one of them the cult leader would die but nah. He lives regardless no matter what we do & continues with his violent ways. That to me, blows. 🙅 still not buying this game. I appreciate the video 👍
Oh! Well that makes alot more since then what I first thought. I still feel iffy about the game but least I understand the bad ending now at least. Thanks 👍
Really? You watch the whole fucking game story without experiencing the actual world or gameplay and then saying you won't buy it? Ofcores you won't buy it after you've just seen everything.
You got a point, though I'm just saying all the "hallucination boss fighting" just gave me bad vibes, I didn't like it but I probably should've watched a playthrough of the game once. I'll do that later
No illegal weapon dealer would ever sell nuke to fanatics. Dealers want cash not world end. 2nd and 3rd are pure bullshit. +Firas Do you know what is diffeence between good game and book? When you know story in book you don't have reason to read it again. When you know story from good game you still want to do it by yourself for gameplay and own choices. Here? GP is just FarCry 3 version 5.0 and ending ruins plot. FC3 had crazy tribebitch which used random guy to kill her cray brother and his crazy boss. Random guy killing tons of trained mercs are lttle unbeliveable, but still ok. Ending? You become same shit crazy as all at Island or stay sane. FC 4? Didn't know why Gale can't become Golden Path leader uf eerybody respect him, but still ok. FC 5? Much bigger requirements, go with little changes and ending with: 1. Strange explosions changing plot. 2. Killing all just to walk away just b4 completing job. 3. Just driving to place and walking away without even trying. 2nd and 3rd choices are just stupid and NONE allow us to arrest Seed. +John Moo plus it's just too overused. In each FC game we have one or few drugged boss fights.
In the second ending, the song is "only you" (that has copyright, so we can't ear it in this video), the same song that the other brother used to manipulate the main character. If you wanna see this ending with the song, you can watch it on ign channel
75.00% Comments about explaining the ending. 10.00% Comments about not buying the game due to ending. 10.00% Rant about sandbox/Free roam games. 5.00% Mentioning Arcade mode.
I don’t know about y’all, but I really like these. I know the comment section is really at arms right now, but through what I’ve seen of the story, they’re great endings.
I honestly feel like the "Leave it be" ending is the better of the two. Mainly because of how Joseph reacts to you leaving him. I personally felt bad about killing his entire family, especially in the cutscenes after you kill each herald. Also, "Forgive, and you will be forgiven" tugged the strings a little bit. Also, if people are right and the Leave it Be ending cuts off before the nuke, then I am sure Joseph would be more than willing to let you go in his bunker after you left him with what little he had left.
The walk away ending is revolving around the first farcry cause my theory Jacob has recreated project farcry by triggering you to kill when you hear that song
Lots of hate on these endings so far but I really quite liked all of them as well as the story itself. People have pretty mad expectations these days but I found it really interesting. The characters are extremely well acted (particularly Joseph Seed and Pratt in my book)
Derx i agree. its nice to have a nice story wrap up, but its not nessesary for a good game. Look at Outlast 2! Real life isnt always a happy ending anyway. I wish people would just enjoy the 99 percent of the game thats good, and ignore the 1% ending. Lol just make up your own happy ending for your own headcanon. I enjoy doing that.
Derx I hate the Ending, because after all this. Joseph Seed still survives. And everyone else dies. The whole game was set up to kill Joseph Seed and you dont even get to do that.
Professor Snuggles I just enjoyed the twist at the end that threw my perceptions throughout the game upside down. Realising in one horrible moment that he was RIGHT about the collapse made me question what my character had been doing throughout the game. Sure the cultists weren't great but were the actions of the main character much different? We all fight for what we believe in even if it goes against the greater good. The deputy fought a cult leader that regardless of all his faults was genuinely trying to save people. Who in that situation is the real 'bad guy'?, are there any bad guys? I suppose I just enjoyed the questions it asked and having Joseph survive made it ultimately more bittersweet and mind bending for me (sorry for the length)
They should continue this storyline in the next game. Forget trying to outdo themselves one game after the next. I’d love to see far cry in a post apocalyptic setting. I know that would really feel like fallout but I feel they could make a better post apocalyptic game than bethesda. *shots fired*
I will buy Ubisoft's crappy open world games if the DLC to the BAD END is the story of Randall Clark aka the Survivalist in Zion. Basically jumping protagonists since Rook is fucked
So it's one of those 'le epic' you're a bad person for playing the game we made for you despite making the 'good' options with literally zero content. Epic writing my guys, 10/10.
Retarded story? Because it's talking about real world issues? And because it continues doing that untill the end of the game? You know that there is no good endings in real life? This is not a fucking anime game with good/evil cliche ending.
Let me be honest, the only reason why people were mad about the ending was it wasn't a happy ending. But if you think about the game is saying ''An eye for an eye the world goes blind.''
Like some characters in this game would say. Not every problem can be solved with a bullet. Message is really clear, you don't fight violence with violence. Ubisoft didn't nail the secret ending but It's pretty interesting when you think about it.
I'm really unimpressed with the endings of Far Cry 5. The "bad" ending: Either Joseph or a foreign power launches a nuclear strike upon Montana. For the sake of how far I'm willing to suspend my disbelief, I'll say the Cult. Why? Because I refuse to accept when something in the bigger universe that has nothing to do with your acts happens just because you made one in game choice, while said event is left out if you pick the other choice. TFU2 did this, and it's shit game writing at it's peak. Therefore, I say the Cult did it. The sum of this ending: Joseph will blow up an entire state to convince himself he's right when someone actually hands his ass to him. The "good" ending: You agree to leave, fuck off from there, and presumably kill the rest of the gang in the car. I sorta like it, and it feels like it could totally happen from where we stand in universe. But if Joseph could trigger you to kill them all, then why didn't he do so when you gave him the middle finger in scenario one? This ties back to what I said about the "bad" ending. Don't introduce factors standing outside the overall scenario within one ending if they aren't included in the others. One can still contrive excuses for it in the case of the trance, and why Joseph didn't use it in the "bad" ending, but they would feel more like excuses than actual reasons. The sum of this ending: Joseph will gladly cut any loose ends. Good on him. Rather boring, but still. The secret ending: You agree to leave, fuck off from there, and that's it. The sum of this ending: Absolutely fucking zero. No answers, no character insight... Nothing. I feel like Far Cry 5 is where the story developers had completely tired of writing the characters and the story. They try to do what they did with Vaas and Pagan Min - both brilliant villains, obviously completely insane, but still oddly human - in particular Pagan - and both of them were, at a fundamental degree right in their ideologies and ways of thinking. They were still fucked up individuals, but they had a point, and that's one of the strongest points of FC3 and 4. That no matter what you did, the villain had a point in what he said. Joseph Seed? He's a religious nutjobb who will raze the state he's in to the ground with nuclear weapons just to get to say he's right. Not saying that doesn't make a potentially very threatening villain(if handled correctly), but I feel like they're trying to sell him in as being right, no matter what happens. And they just didn't achieve this. Ah, maybe I'm just searching too deeply. Maybe he's just intended as a religious nutjobb who will raze the state he's in to the ground with nuclear weapons just to get to say he's right. That's fine to. But I've come to expect more of Far Cry Villains, and while I had great fun playing the game, the story left me very unsatisfied.
What I don't get is that if you do walk away no nukes happen but but in new dawn its a nuclear wasteland so it u do walk away Montana is still nuked 😤😒 confused
For real, the nuclear ending is the best ending because far cry new dawn will have sense with far cry 5 If we chose the *good* ending far cry new dawn will have no sense
I myself prefer Joseph over Vaas, mostly because he's not only psychotic, but also terrifying and sympathetic at times. Vaas was very good, but in long run it fell short when I learned that he was scared of Hoyt and he never manage to do what Joseph did, scare me and make me understand his character more.
This has been a constant problem throughout the narratives of the far cry games since 3. They aim to subvert genre tropes by bombarding you with those very same tropes. Like I'm a bad person for murdering all those cultists? utilising the mechanics that not only you put in place, but made REALLY fun? "Oh well just walk away at the start then" Aha. £50. To not play a game. Yes. Also given the current social climate in America I feel like there was a huge missed opportunity for a story that at created something to talk about. Instead we got nukes.
So, uhh...essentially the two other endings don't matter, because regardless of either we'll leave in the beginning, or at the end, the world's still fucked, right? So we'll just die :D.
I would have given anything for that apocalypse with the nukes and fire and all that to end up just being Seed hallucinating from some kind of "Bliss overdose" and I know that is still kinda bullcrap but it sure beats whatever the actual heck that ending was supposed to be
It had to have been an isolated incident. First off no country would waste nukes on a county in the middle of nowhere in Montana. Second, if it was sent from another country, it would have wiped out hope county with one nuke quickly, because modern nukes are way more devastating. Third, if the world was at war and it resulted in nukes this would not only taint the franchise of Far Cry but technically kill the connected games theory that Ubisoft has been establishing. Meaning no Far Cry 6, Assassins Creed, Watch Dogs 3, etc.. also Joseph seems like the dude that would fake the apocalypse to keep his flock
Gabe Bear Zilla I believe so... But I think the nuke ending is just a hallucination of Rook's since s-he has been exposed to drugs Soo many times... Specially the walking away ending proves that protagonist is still under-control of the Bliss... For me FC5 is just an introduction to the real story
Everybody is complaining about the fact that there really isn’t a good ending. I think it’s great, makes you think about how life isn’t always fair or that sometimes the answer isn’t what we like. I know some people will argue that video games are supposed to be escapism from real life. You can still enjoy the game and do everything you like but walking away making you think is an added bonus too.
When ur in the bunker and that cutsence is over what happens, u can't play the game or ...... What happens after those cutsence/ending?? What can u do can u still play the game or ur done
When they make far cry games from this point onward they should make a option in the early game to join the ‘bad guy’ and don’t give us the same missions we’d be doing if we was playing the game normally. Give us different missions aswell, now that’s adding options and I’d have to play the game twice just for that reason alone. As of rn no reason to replay this game sadly
Why are people complaining about there being no good ending? The game stayed true to itself. Right from the get go, the Sheriff and the Father said that it's better for everyone if you just leave(maybe then coming back with the national guard or whatever). So the secret ending is the best option actually. But if you decide to stay in this mess, killing hunderds and hunderds of people, getting drug addicted, your mind being manipulated and them constantly trying to make you believe and follow ''the path'', ofcores there will be no good ending after all of that shit, for you, and your helpless friends. And for me this was the best FarCry story yet. In FarCry 3 there was only Vaas, everyone else(I can't even remember any of them) was forgettable and uninteresting whatsoever. Also about who had the better villain, for me the Father is more intimidating than Vaas because he fully believes in everything he is saying and doing, also almost everything he is saying about what's wrong with today's society is true. His actions are evil, but his words are true. Whilst Vaas was a psychopath and evil in everything he said and done. Both are really really great, but the Father edges it for me because of what he is saying.
Secret ending: Deputy ignores order fromthe Marshal, who has no legal authority over them. Marshal backs-off and comes back with Whitetails as deputies (Posse Comitatus), Whitehorse contacts outside agencies, namely the BATFE (unregistered NFA items) and DEA (Peggies trafficking Bliss).
I really don't think the nuke ending is the bad ending because it's the only logical ending and I don't like how ubisoft tries to shove down our throut that the father was right. OK he knew the prohecy but that doesn't mean he can form a violent cult and kill people who do not agree. what I mean is his knowledge of the world coming to an end does not justify his actions. So in the end when he sais" I was right " I said fuck you, youre not.Great game but mediocre story and not a well thought out ending.
If Far Cry games continue to be sequels to one another. Then that means the next Far Cry will be like a Fallout game. Which the ending credit music of Far Cry 5 was weirdly Fallout sounding which was weird. Or this was their last Far Cry game, so they decided to end it on a world ending Ending.
the father was right that Explosion in ending 1 was yellowstone erupting ending the world the flashing light makes sense yellowstone is so bright and huge you will be able to see it in space, the mushroom cloud comes from even normal volcanoes. the sirens were the government warning everyone because thats hwat they would do but if you live near it which montana is its too late. you would also see and hear a nuke dropping as the whistle is so loud. thus making the father right all along.
Wait, what happened in the walk away ending? Was he poisoned or something? And why not continue the ending by rolling in there with the national guard?
Throughout the entire game Joseph, Faith, Jacob, and John are hinting at the world going to shit and tearing itself apart and people say that this ending comes out of nowhere lmao. Just because a game has no "good" ending doesn't mean it's not a damn good game with excellent performances, gameplay, replayablity, and story.
It’s like far cry 4 ending, sit at the table and wait for pagen, then You go and put your mother ashes and bang you’re done, the best ending here is not putting the cuffs on him and going away
General Grievous no, in far cry 4 you can either, shoot pagan and not lay your mother ashes you can, go with him and lay your mother ashes, and after you did he leaves in a chopper, which gives you the ability to kill him
Rhis game is a combintation of all the far cry frachise...the tutorial is a far cry 3,4 and primal....the freeroam far cry primal and 4...and the final far cry 4 Valley of the Yety.
Situation with FC5 looks exactly the same, as with Mass Effect 3 ending, They add some extra endings, because people's hate original endings. I think, Ubi also add alternative endings after critical opinions from players. I like endings in Ubisoft games, but this one in FC5 sucks. It looks like ending from AC Black Flag, we want to be a hero, much guys die, ok, but we kill much of bad guys, not a good guys. In AC:BF all our friends die, because Edward want to find Observatory. Anyway, there are only two good for us guys, Thatch and Marry, another are assholes. In FC3 we want to save our friends, in this time we save all people's on the island from pirates what is good, at the end we can still finished this, what we want to do and save our friends, so there is a good ending, no matter what happen's with Citra(anyway if we look at the Joseph, Citra looks exactly the same, this is fucking cult). In Far Cry 4 we have a choice again, at the start we really haven't any reason's to kill Pagan Min. There's only personal war before Sabal and Amita, but Sabal is the same as Pagan, Amita want to go in the future, what for me was a good choice. But Far Cry 5? We can walk away, Joseph's cult still burn all, kill the people's, steal what they want, if we try to kill him, he destroy all with fucking nukes, or, we can again walk away, but at the end we kill our friends. Wtf Ubi? We play more than 20 hours for saving people's in Montana and our "friends" and at the end all fucked up, cause crazy Joseph Seed have a right? So, in Far Cry 5 we haven't any good, or neutral(if we walk away, cult still destroy all) ending. Ubisoft kill this series. I know, in all Far Cry games we haven't really good ending's, but we have a choice, and the choice is this, what players want.
Jason Harden What would you prefer? Plus, there were several hints throughout the game that foreshadowed something bad happening in the end, it's not like it just came out of nowhere. It's the entire premise of the game.
Sir I know you want good guys lose sometimes but pls dont say "this is a standard ending for far cry..." ubisoft never set a standard ending for the game you just made it up
Dear People who are saying The endings don't make sense: Let me tell you about a game called "Outlast".... The ending in that didn't make any sense....But they made a DLC called "Whistleblower" which was even scarier and more fucked up than the original game ( Jesus Christ I still remember it ) which they kinda explained what happened / made a better ending..... Now....I'm don't work in Ubisoft or either can predict the future but I'm 90% sure that Ubisoft.....is going to do the same thing..... Because let's be honest.....People would so buy that.....and Ubisoft knows it too...... Sooooooooooo......I guess you should stop complaining and wait for a DLC or Someone explaining the endings in a video couple of months later ( kinda like Bo3 where the story and the endings didn't make any sense even tho I played it like 100 times Until like.... Couple of months later, I found video in RUclips where somebody explained it in 30 minutes or something.....)
I think the nuke ending should have given the option to take down Joseph. Like kick him in the face while he's leering at you, then strangle him with your thighs, then sit and starve to death because you're handcuffed to the bed. Kinda goofy, but it grants the player the option to have some satisfaction. I don't think this is too goofy for this game however, this game literally has a diabetic bear as a companion.
Man! If they add another ending that is so good, Rook and his gang would be sending everything they got at them (if they didn't try to arrest Joseph Seed aka The Father) Even the *resistance* too, and the damn *National Guard* on their side against the Cultists. And none other than that, this is going to be "Waco Siege" all over again. This time it's 2.0 😮
Only good ending is to walk away and let NG smash lunatics. About that Joseph: he is obviously mad but it appears he is a real prophet who saw something from the future (nuclear disaster).
![Far Cry 5: Inside Eden’s Gate - Full Live Action Short Film | Ubisoft [NA]](/img/1.gif)
so theoretically, when the sheriff said "if you put the cuffs on him, non of us is getting here out alive" is true.
Like your comment is a revelation.. that's what it means.. The writers knew you would know that every other option leaves everyone dead.. so made the Sherrif say it prophetically.
Basically if you want a descent ending your not even supposed to play the game
None of these ending are good. What the fuck was Ubisoft thinking?! A bittersweet ending at the very least would've been fine. But the Father wins in all of these.
Yannkam 212 To each their own I suppose. But I hated this. You tried saving the county from these assholes, who slaughtered and violated people and animals in this 'mission'. And in the end, they win. Even the Father gloated in that one ending he was 'right'.
Whats with Ubisoft and dark endings for fun sandbox games?
LIONREV7 *Innovation*
Far cry 3 had good ending:/
Kamil Krok a good ending would be one, where jason and lisa kiss and go out together. Now he just saves them and tells them to fuck off as he is changed. The other ending is bad considering that she chose us only to get a baby out of jason. So its bad but not as dark as this
LIONREV7 if I'm honest, it wasn't fun at all. The only fun I had was flying
You may continue the ''sandboxing'' once you're done with the game.
So there is no good ending? You can either :
1. Be brainwashed at the end
2. Be stuck in a bunker with a lunatic and do nothing
3. Walk away
Pretty stupid, if you ask me.
Exactly the title should be
Stupid/Fucked up/Secret
Far Cry going into Fucked up endings
Why is it stupid? Do you always want a good ending in your games? That's boring. Every story doesn't end on a good note.
TheBeauJOB Well no, but with everything you been through there should be 1 good ending. A bit hard to get, but at least you grind to get the ending.
TheBeauJOB because it's a giant hole in this game that Ubisoft cannot fulfil like the fucking nuke! If anyone explain that,I'll be really glad.
TheBeauJOB
No, I don't. But this game has multiple endings, and all of them are bad endings. Far Cry 4 had better endings than this, and that is saying something.
so really there is no good ending
kieran pickering I know right! Damn...here I was hoping for a slightly better ending than Far Cry 4. Primal had a decent ending though but still!
many people wanted an ending where our character joins the cult so the walk away option is not too bad
Saransh Oberoi makes sense but still...they could have at least hinted about the nuke dropping. Hope this gets a dlc that patches up HOW they nuke even fell there in the first place
Manlalarong Pinoy I prefer the walk away ending. I agree, the nuke ending came out of no where, when first saw it few hours ago on other channel, I was like " WTF, WHY AND HOW?".
I feel there must be a hint, u know all those notes and letter in game which barely anyone reads? I think one of them may have an answer like WW3 about to start or something.
Saransh Oberoi totally agree but then we'll have to wait for someone to look for these clues and post it. I would love to but my rig ain't enough to handle it
Why is it that the creators of Far Cry, ever since 3, feel the need to give us less good in their good endings? I mean seriously, what the hell? How did the story go from killing the crap out of crazy cultists to two nukes dropping on the state for some unknown reason? Did the Father steal the nukes? Was America at war a nuclear superpower during the game?
This crap literally came out of nowhere
Exactly
I think Joseph found Nuclear Warhead at the county and then start creating the cult
But since you know where it detonated is it possible to go there maybe defuse it?
It’s the Yellowstone eruption
What if those nukes were connected to another game by Ubisoft? Like how Assassin's Creed and Watchdogs were connected.
There was 3, 1 - first and 2 - while we are riding
The game is very explicit about telling you the best thing that you can do is to walk away...
I would love a DLC where you play as rook and have to escape Joseph and make it out of Montana yourself and it's more of a horror survival game instead of a farcry game
You know I just realized something, isn't the intro to the game after the events of the game? Like the part with Nick, Mary, and Jerome talking about the cult? If so does that mean that the whole nuke ending really was just a bliss hallucination?
For those confused about the end of the walkaway ending(2nd one in the videos order) the person in the video doesnt have music on I guess but it plays “Only You” which Jacob physcologically hardwired your brain to go on a killing spree(against the resistance/good guys) whenever you hear(the part where you shoot all the people in the Jacob scenes and then you shoot the last by instinct who is Eli
None of the ending are really good, but, hey, did you all forget this is a Farcry game? When have any of the endings actually been good? Most are neutral at best, never "good".
TheKeeganW Far cry 3 had a good ending. So did Dragon blood and the first game.
Antoine Davis i wouldn't call what Jason went through in 3 good in the end. Sure he gets to leave with most of the people he came with but..well. depends on the definition of "good". Most lived? Sure. Mentally sound? Debatable.
Rather have it be neutral than be shit like this
Far cry 3 can't said it was good ending. Yea Jason probably went home with his friends and brother but he stated how fuck up he is that he lost count home many he killed call himself a monster.
Far cry 4 had a good ending if you don't include the inside rivalries, every ending is at least satisfactory with Pagan
The nuke ending kinda makes sense if you pay attention to watch each of the leaders of Seed's cult says, especially about how shitty our world leaders are, how things are escalating, and how crazy the headlines are getting. It's pretty much our world leaders reaching the point where full-scale nuclear war has been waged and it happens right at the exact moment you resist Joseph for the last time, thus making him "seem" as if he was right all along. It's not god unleashing his wrath upon the world, it's our world leaders pressing their own shiny red button on each other.
The devs fucked themselves over. Basically, the "best" ending is to walk away at the very beginning, which means the "best" ending involves avoiding the entire story. AKA "You want a decent not-fucked-up ending? Don't play the game fuck-face!". The standard endings are a) "bad" (walk away at the end after fighting father Gung Ho for hours then unwillingly kill your friends) and b) "the worst of the fuckin' worst" (God knows how much of the world blew up and you're stuck with the nut job that is Joseph Seed). Kind of a weird situation Ubisoft got themselves into with FC5 and its endings...
Well...they did the exact same thing in far cry 4. To get the good ending you do the logical thing and sit for like 10 minutes.
That kinda remind me of spec ops: the line tbh. You gain none if you make the choice to push on
Rjeffery14 There was not a single moment in the game that made the player think he was going to be "awarded" in the end.
Rjeffery14 It's not stupid. It's the way it was meant to end and there were no signs of any sort of good ending, because we don't need a good ending. We're not emotional women on their period watching a drama and crying because of the sad ending.
Rjeffery14.. who said far cry "a game where you survive by killing people and animals to craft shit" was a fun and campy game? if you want a good ending, go play undertale, or my little pony
I just finished the game earlier I put almost 70 hours into this game and I got it the day it cane out lol but this game was beyond amazing and the ending ruined the whole damn game for me
I've said what I said about how I feel about the endings, but then I thought about something. Does every game truly need an ending thats labeled good or bad. Whats truly a good ending or bad ending? Maybe each ending has its own reason as to why it is what it is. Some people (like myself) think both endings are bad, others think the nuke is good because it elimates majority of the cult, yet unfortunately Joseph seed lives, then others consider it a bad ending if you leave and let the cult live on to cause more chaos. Then again, Nuke would be considered bad, because everyone you became close with, dies, and then leaving ending would be considered good because no one dies and there's no big bomb. Is there really a good or bad ending? Because from what I'm seeing, its all about how you, the player, experience the game and how you take in the outcome of your actions. See it as however you like, just remember, should it truly be a labeled ending to games like these?
31:00
I just put 2 and 2 together, the sheriff's name is Whitehorse by the way.
You would think that after they went so long without communicating back to HQ that they would send in the National Guard or something
hotline miami 2 final.
This guy gets it
So basically you get brainwashed in both endings
Supreme fatty Kim Jong un either brainwashed or trapped with a maniac
Wing ZX1103 you get brainwashed either way
The only good ending is walking away, and calling the National Guard. Why do you have to shoot them to remove the drugs? Lazy Ubisoft.
It depends when you walk away though because when you do it in the beginning, you miss a lot of gameplay but when you do it in the end, the Father still wins because he turns on the radio and it puts you into "slaughter mode" and you kill everyone in the car. So honestly either way its just not a great option
Caleb Holland No, walk away is really good ending. Your soul tried to save friends. What happened next is not your guilt. And we dont know what happened next after Rook heard song. Maybe someone in car survived, maybe NG came and wipe out lunatics.
Goga Montana please learn to spoken
WillTheGrimreaper you too, not spoken - to speak!
Wow... all those endings were super depressing. I mean, Far Cry has never been a cheery game, but this one? Joseph wins in all scenarios. he gets to keep doing what he's doing.
IDk, can we have a "happy" ending? Joe goes to jail. you can even make dark, like he just starts the cult up again in the prison, but I put in all this work for Hope County for... nothing?
Curse Me Good Pretty much. My question is does the county go up in flames in all the endings or just the one you see it happen in? Either way I have several problems with that, for instance Nick Rye and his wife have their daughter born during the game, which was very touching, but then you remember the "good" ending. Did Nick and his family die? Does Ubisoft do baby killing now? Wait, yes they do, as Joseph himself explained. Another thing is Hurk, is he dead too? He's supposed to appear in every Far Cry game, so is Ubisoft breaking franchise tradition on top of killing babies? Or does this signify the end of Far Cry? If so what a mediocre note to end it on. The gameplay is nice, but the story couldn't be worse.
just everybody and everything you've saved goes up in a mushroom cloud. Come the fuck on, Ubisoft!
He has too. You can't kill him or Far Cry New Dawn can't exist.
So let me get this straight:
Ending one is a nuclear explosion caused by the cult or by some forigne Nation.
Ending two is driving away but once the radio got turned on I think the Silent Protagonist got set into a trance like with that music box & killed everyone in the car.
Ending Three (or the secret ending, I think) is getting a warrant to arrest the cult leader but doing so would get you killed, so rather than that happen we just... Walk away & probably got fired.
Man, idk if its just me but I don't like this game after seeing the boss fights & the other endings. Sheesh, you'd think at least in one of them the cult leader would die but nah. He lives regardless no matter what we do & continues with his violent ways.
That to me, blows. 🙅 still not buying this game.
I appreciate the video 👍
It wasn’t a nuclear blast. In the bad ending The Father was actually right about the collapse. It’s the super volcano under Yellowstone erupting
Oh! Well that makes alot more since then what I first thought. I still feel iffy about the game but least I understand the bad ending now at least.
Thanks 👍
Really? You watch the whole fucking game story without experiencing the actual world or gameplay and then saying you won't buy it? Ofcores you won't buy it after you've just seen everything.
You got a point, though I'm just saying all the "hallucination boss fighting" just gave me bad vibes, I didn't like it but I probably should've watched a playthrough of the game once. I'll do that later
No illegal weapon dealer would ever sell nuke to fanatics. Dealers want cash not world end. 2nd and 3rd are pure bullshit.
+Firas Do you know what is diffeence between good game and book? When you know story in book you don't have reason to read it again. When you know story from good game you still want to do it by yourself for gameplay and own choices. Here? GP is just FarCry 3 version 5.0 and ending ruins plot. FC3 had crazy tribebitch which used random guy to kill her cray brother and his crazy boss. Random guy killing tons of trained mercs are lttle unbeliveable, but still ok. Ending? You become same shit crazy as all at Island or stay sane.
FC 4? Didn't know why Gale can't become Golden Path leader uf eerybody respect him, but still ok. FC 5? Much bigger requirements, go with little changes and ending with:
1. Strange explosions changing plot.
2. Killing all just to walk away just b4 completing job.
3. Just driving to place and walking away without even trying.
2nd and 3rd choices are just stupid and NONE allow us to arrest Seed.
+John Moo plus it's just too overused. In each FC game we have one or few drugged boss fights.
In the second ending, the song is "only you" (that has copyright, so we can't ear it in this video), the same song that the other brother used to manipulate the main character. If you wanna see this ending with the song, you can watch it on ign channel
Why did it look like we were tweaking at the second ending?
Did Jacob Seed's song start playing on the radio?
It was indeed, but for copyright the music was edited out here.
Yep, and you end up killing pratt whitehorse and hudson
75.00% Comments about explaining the ending.
10.00% Comments about not buying the game due to ending.
10.00% Rant about sandbox/Free roam games.
5.00% Mentioning Arcade mode.
I don’t know about y’all, but I really like these. I know the comment section is really at arms right now, but through what I’ve seen of the story, they’re great endings.
I honestly feel like the "Leave it be" ending is the better of the two. Mainly because of how Joseph reacts to you leaving him. I personally felt bad about killing his entire family, especially in the cutscenes after you kill each herald. Also, "Forgive, and you will be forgiven" tugged the strings a little bit.
Also, if people are right and the Leave it Be ending cuts off before the nuke, then I am sure Joseph would be more than willing to let you go in his bunker after you left him with what little he had left.
The walk away ending is revolving around the first farcry cause my theory Jacob has recreated project farcry by triggering you to kill when you hear that song
Lots of hate on these endings so far but I really quite liked all of them as well as the story itself. People have pretty mad expectations these days but I found it really interesting. The characters are extremely well acted (particularly Joseph Seed and Pratt in my book)
Derx i agree. its nice to have a nice story wrap up, but its not nessesary for a good game. Look at Outlast 2! Real life isnt always a happy ending anyway. I wish people would just enjoy the 99 percent of the game thats good, and ignore the 1% ending. Lol just make up your own happy ending for your own headcanon. I enjoy doing that.
Derx I hate the Ending, because after all this. Joseph Seed still survives. And everyone else dies.
The whole game was set up to kill Joseph Seed and you dont even get to do that.
Professor Snuggles we can agree to disagree aha
Derx yup, although you liking the bad guy to survive is still weird to me.
Professor Snuggles I just enjoyed the twist at the end that threw my perceptions throughout the game upside down. Realising in one horrible moment that he was RIGHT about the collapse made me question what my character had been doing throughout the game. Sure the cultists weren't great but were the actions of the main character much different? We all fight for what we believe in even if it goes against the greater good. The deputy fought a cult leader that regardless of all his faults was genuinely trying to save people. Who in that situation is the real 'bad guy'?, are there any bad guys? I suppose I just enjoyed the questions it asked and having Joseph survive made it ultimately more bittersweet and mind bending for me (sorry for the length)
21:16 so is he executing your companions after you've left?
Noo.. have you played the game? He keeps them as his 'children'
They should continue this storyline in the next game. Forget trying to outdo themselves one game after the next. I’d love to see far cry in a post apocalyptic setting. I know that would really feel like fallout but I feel they could make a better post apocalyptic game than bethesda. *shots fired*
I will buy Ubisoft's crappy open world games if the DLC to the BAD END is the story of Randall Clark aka the Survivalist in Zion. Basically jumping protagonists since Rook is fucked
Dark Roy Gaming if you listen to the radio enough you can hear a report about how the Middle East nuke Moscow and how America's Next
Dark Roy Gaming go look up far cry 5 ending explained sorta
Dark Roy Gaming you trusted a single word polygon said
Or just play the upcoming metro game
Can't even kill Joseph WTF !!!
What a rip off
Mike Smith the gameplay is good though
First and last Far Cry game I ever waste money on. Don't make me wanna kill him so bad and then deny me the opportunity to do so. Fuck this game.
old m4n attacks Harley but they f&#cked up the ending
You can kill him. In Arcade mode... Getting mad at a game just because you can't kill someone is really stupid if you think about it.
I got chills when the nuke struck. I dropped my controller
I counted at least 3 nukes, i think.
So it's one of those 'le epic' you're a bad person for playing the game we made for you despite making the 'good' options with literally zero content. Epic writing my guys, 10/10.
blaster702 It tells a story. It's not an RPG.
Monika is Bae It tells a retarded story with an unsatisfying conclusion.
Retarded story? Because it's talking about real world issues? And because it continues doing that untill the end of the game? You know that there is no good endings in real life? This is not a fucking anime game with good/evil cliche ending.
Firas Ziada Game doesnt say shit all about real world issues. It's a story about an evil cult, it directly sidesteps most political issues.
blaster702 were you skipping through all the dialogue?
People who don't understand the walk away ending obviously haven't played the game or fought Jacob Seed before.
Am i the only one who remembers the golden rule of the far cry games?..... that there's never truly a "happy ending" to them?
The ending where you choose to resist felt like some crazy Cloverfield twist.
so, it was just a bad dream, in reality the sheriff understood it was too much risk to arrest Joseph and better let the army deal with them, I think
I wish they have dlc story to continue and brought good ending.
Let me be honest, the only reason why people were mad about the ending was it wasn't a happy ending. But if you think about the game is saying ''An eye for an eye the world goes blind.''
Strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
Like some characters in this game would say. Not every problem can be solved with a bullet.
Message is really clear, you don't fight violence with violence. Ubisoft didn't nail the secret ending but It's pretty interesting when you think about it.
I'm really unimpressed with the endings of Far Cry 5.
The "bad" ending: Either Joseph or a foreign power launches a nuclear strike upon Montana. For the sake of how far I'm willing to suspend my disbelief, I'll say the Cult. Why? Because I refuse to accept when something in the bigger universe that has nothing to do with your acts happens just because you made one in game choice, while said event is left out if you pick the other choice. TFU2 did this, and it's shit game writing at it's peak. Therefore, I say the Cult did it.
The sum of this ending: Joseph will blow up an entire state to convince himself he's right when someone actually hands his ass to him.
The "good" ending: You agree to leave, fuck off from there, and presumably kill the rest of the gang in the car. I sorta like it, and it feels like it could totally happen from where we stand in universe. But if Joseph could trigger you to kill them all, then why didn't he do so when you gave him the middle finger in scenario one? This ties back to what I said about the "bad" ending. Don't introduce factors standing outside the overall scenario within one ending if they aren't included in the others. One can still contrive excuses for it in the case of the trance, and why Joseph didn't use it in the "bad" ending, but they would feel more like excuses than actual reasons.
The sum of this ending: Joseph will gladly cut any loose ends. Good on him. Rather boring, but still.
The secret ending: You agree to leave, fuck off from there, and that's it.
The sum of this ending: Absolutely fucking zero. No answers, no character insight... Nothing.
I feel like Far Cry 5 is where the story developers had completely tired of writing the characters and the story. They try to do what they did with Vaas and Pagan Min - both brilliant villains, obviously completely insane, but still oddly human - in particular Pagan - and both of them were, at a fundamental degree right in their ideologies and ways of thinking. They were still fucked up individuals, but they had a point, and that's one of the strongest points of FC3 and 4. That no matter what you did, the villain had a point in what he said.
Joseph Seed? He's a religious nutjobb who will raze the state he's in to the ground with nuclear weapons just to get to say he's right. Not saying that doesn't make a potentially very threatening villain(if handled correctly), but I feel like they're trying to sell him in as being right, no matter what happens. And they just didn't achieve this.
Ah, maybe I'm just searching too deeply. Maybe he's just intended as a religious nutjobb who will raze the state he's in to the ground with nuclear weapons just to get to say he's right. That's fine to. But I've come to expect more of Far Cry Villains, and while I had great fun playing the game, the story left me very unsatisfied.
So... It's there where the Fallout series start?
What I don't get is that if you do walk away no nukes happen but but in new dawn its a nuclear wasteland so it u do walk away Montana is still nuked 😤😒 confused
This is the cod ghosts 2 ending
For real, the nuclear ending is the best ending because far cry new dawn will have sense with far cry 5
If we chose the *good* ending far cry new dawn will have no sense
which one is good ending actually?? blast with nuclear or they just leave without any harm?? anyone please answer my question..im cunfuse..
Mizi Iva I Would Say The Ending At The Start Of The Game When You Dont Arrest Father
Vaas was a million times better
Luis Maldonado vaas will always be far cry best character
King Min is the best followed by Jackal and then vaas
I myself prefer Joseph over Vaas, mostly because he's not only psychotic, but also terrifying and sympathetic at times. Vaas was very good, but in long run it fell short when I learned that he was scared of Hoyt and he never manage to do what Joseph did, scare me and make me understand his character more.
Ignacio doriga Vaas isn't even the main villain.
This has been a constant problem throughout the narratives of the far cry games since 3. They aim to subvert genre tropes by bombarding you with those very same tropes. Like I'm a bad person for murdering all those cultists? utilising the mechanics that not only you put in place, but made REALLY fun?
"Oh well just walk away at the start then"
Aha. £50. To not play a game. Yes.
Also given the current social climate in America I feel like there was a huge missed opportunity for a story that at created something to talk about.
Instead we got nukes.
This is just like Half Life 2 cuz there is no good ending lmao
2K Savage No, its nothing like half life 2.
So, uhh...essentially the two other endings don't matter, because regardless of either we'll leave in the beginning, or at the end, the world's still fucked, right? So we'll just die :D.
Yeah it's pretty hard for a deputy to stop a nuclear war.
so what happened to rook on the second ending?
I want to know what happened to rook on 22:13
ʟᴀᴍʙᴏ sᴀɴ my guess is thanks to Jacobs musical brain washing, rook likely killed everyone
RoughneckMP it's literally A cop out...
George Photakis *mic drop*
ONLY YOOUUU...
Interesting, because the main character won’t be a winner, so you have to choose the best way not to let things gone wrong
The car ending reminds me of the end of the far cry 4 dlc ending
I would have given anything for that apocalypse with the nukes and fire and all that to end up just being Seed hallucinating from some kind of "Bliss overdose" and I know that is still kinda bullcrap but it sure beats whatever the actual heck that ending was supposed to be
Nice :) Bought the game for $60 and ended the campaign in 15h. Well thats a gg. Anyone can recommend a longer campaign game? XD
Surely I’m not the only one who can watch spoilers and not feel that anything is spoiled.
It had to have been an isolated incident. First off no country would waste nukes on a county in the middle of nowhere in Montana. Second, if it was sent from another country, it would have wiped out hope county with one nuke quickly, because modern nukes are way more devastating. Third, if the world was at war and it resulted in nukes this would not only taint the franchise of Far Cry but technically kill the connected games theory that Ubisoft has been establishing. Meaning no Far Cry 6, Assassins Creed, Watch Dogs 3, etc.. also Joseph seems like the dude that would fake the apocalypse to keep his flock
Do y’all think FC6 might relate to this one or it will be completely different. For some reason this feels like a sequel.
Gabe Bear Zilla I believe so... But I think the nuke ending is just a hallucination of Rook's since s-he has been exposed to drugs Soo many times... Specially the walking away ending proves that protagonist is still under-control of the Bliss...
For me FC5 is just an introduction to the real story
Everybody is complaining about the fact that there really isn’t a good ending. I think it’s great, makes you think about how life isn’t always fair or that sometimes the answer isn’t what we like. I know some people will argue that video games are supposed to be escapism from real life. You can still enjoy the game and do everything you like but walking away making you think is an added bonus too.
When ur in the bunker and that cutsence is over what happens, u can't play the game or ...... What happens after those cutsence/ending?? What can u do can u still play the game or ur done
27:15 autobots transform and roll out LOOL XDXD
When they make far cry games from this point onward they should make a option in the early game to join the ‘bad guy’ and don’t give us the same missions we’d be doing if we was playing the game normally. Give us different missions aswell, now that’s adding options and I’d have to play the game twice just for that reason alone. As of rn no reason to replay this game sadly
Who the fuck dropped the nuke in US territory in the first place?
i dont know for sure but i believe there is a documentary about "broken arrows" some of it in the US and Canada...could the Father found one maybe?
Maybe there's something going on in the US like a war or economic crisis
He did, he dropped the nuke. . .
North Korea
North Korea got nuked near the end of the game, the same happened to russia. Could be either of them or another nuclear power.
I hope there is far cry 5 dlc that the war got started with america goverment vs the father(joseph seed) with his follower
To everybody ending 1 id thr yellowstone eruption not a nuke if it was the mushroom cloud would look different and be way bigger. Its a cloud of ash
Up to 1:51........I wonder if he should say that to himself.
So, whats next: Zombies? Aliens? A complete new Hope Country map in Fallout style?
We have to wait and see...
Why are people complaining about there being no good ending? The game stayed true to itself. Right from the get go, the Sheriff and the Father said that it's better for everyone if you just leave(maybe then coming back with the national guard or whatever). So the secret ending is the best option actually. But if you decide to stay in this mess, killing hunderds and hunderds of people, getting drug addicted, your mind being manipulated and them constantly trying to make you believe and follow ''the path'', ofcores there will be no good ending after all of that shit, for you, and your helpless friends. And for me this was the best FarCry story yet. In FarCry 3 there was only Vaas, everyone else(I can't even remember any of them) was forgettable and uninteresting whatsoever. Also about who had the better villain, for me the Father is more intimidating than Vaas because he fully believes in everything he is saying and doing, also almost everything he is saying about what's wrong with today's society is true. His actions are evil, but his words are true. Whilst Vaas was a psychopath and evil in everything he said and done. Both are really really great, but the Father edges it for me because of what he is saying.
Secret ending: Deputy ignores order fromthe Marshal, who has no legal authority over them. Marshal backs-off and comes back with Whitetails as deputies (Posse Comitatus), Whitehorse contacts outside agencies, namely the BATFE (unregistered NFA items) and DEA (Peggies trafficking Bliss).
Wait wait, about the walking away ending and the song, did they tried to make BioShock?
I really don't think the nuke ending is the bad ending because it's the only logical ending and I don't like how ubisoft tries to shove down our throut that the father was right. OK he knew the prohecy but that doesn't mean he can form a violent cult and kill people who do not agree. what I mean is his knowledge of the world coming to an end does not justify his actions. So in the end when he sais" I was right " I said fuck you, youre not.Great game but mediocre story and not a well thought out ending.
Cpt.Nexus it is not a nuke it was the end of the world Joseph was right
Yeah end of the world by nuclear warfare. Also the mushroom cloud means it is a nuke.
Cpt.Nexus no it was a volcano lol
Cpt.Nexus it was a mega volcano 1 nuke doesn't destroy the world lmao
Cpt.Nexus and he made the cult in order to protect his family
If Far Cry games continue to be sequels to one another. Then that means the next Far Cry will be like a Fallout game. Which the ending credit music of Far Cry 5 was weirdly Fallout sounding which was weird.
Or this was their last Far Cry game, so they decided to end it on a world ending Ending.
Favorite part of the nuclear ending is hearing Pratt lose his shit in the backseat. Poor guy has suffered enough.
the father was right that Explosion in ending 1 was yellowstone erupting ending the world the flashing light makes sense yellowstone is so bright and huge you will be able to see it in space, the mushroom cloud comes from even normal volcanoes. the sirens were the government warning everyone because thats hwat they would do but if you live near it which montana is its too late. you would also see and hear a nuke dropping as the whistle is so loud. thus making the father right all along.
It was nuclear war my friend
@@podroznikzpustkowi4805 bro i made this a year ago i forgot i even commented on this shit lol
Wait, what happened in the walk away ending? Was he poisoned or something? And why not continue the ending by rolling in there with the national guard?
The mentors might be alein ships from mars.. its a theory because what if nick rye fails to stop it and the Marations launch the missiles
Throughout the entire game Joseph, Faith, Jacob, and John are hinting at the world going to shit and tearing itself apart and people say that this ending comes out of nowhere lmao. Just because a game has no "good" ending doesn't mean it's not a damn good game with excellent performances, gameplay, replayablity, and story.
Which one is good which one is bad and how do you get the secret ending?
These Far Cry game show that the secret ending is really the good ending after all
At the end nomatter what the father will always see you as his biggest weapon
Is there an ending if you accept johns thing? Because you could of said yes and what if you didn’t say it?
The resist ending is really like them telling us there will be a sequel... I mean, Joseph wins in every outcome whatsoever.
From who was that Nuke????
It’s like far cry 4 ending, sit at the table and wait for pagen, then You go and put your mother ashes and bang you’re done, the best ending here is not putting the cuffs on him and going away
Maksim Lougasi so basically it’s better to not play both there games and just short cut it
General Grievous no, in far cry 4 you can either, shoot pagan and not lay your mother ashes
you can, go with him and lay your mother ashes, and after you did he leaves in a chopper, which gives you the ability to kill him
Maksim Lougasi or when you first meet him, don’t escape the compound and he takes you to your mothers resting place himself
Goddammit i was so hyped for this game untill the goddamn ending. It shattered the experience for me.
So can you still do free roam
Rhis game is a combintation of all the far cry frachise...the tutorial is a far cry 3,4 and primal....the freeroam far cry primal and 4...and the final far cry 4 Valley of the Yety.
Can anyone tell me what exactly happend in the walk away ending aftr the music was turned on in radio???
Situation with FC5 looks exactly the same, as with Mass Effect 3 ending, They add some extra endings, because people's hate original endings. I think, Ubi also add alternative endings after critical opinions from players. I like endings in Ubisoft games, but this one in FC5 sucks. It looks like ending from AC Black Flag, we want to be a hero, much guys die, ok, but we kill much of bad guys, not a good guys. In AC:BF all our friends die, because Edward want to find Observatory. Anyway, there are only two good for us guys, Thatch and Marry, another are assholes. In FC3 we want to save our friends, in this time we save all people's on the island from pirates what is good, at the end we can still finished this, what we want to do and save our friends, so there is a good ending, no matter what happen's with Citra(anyway if we look at the Joseph, Citra looks exactly the same, this is fucking cult). In Far Cry 4 we have a choice again, at the start we really haven't any reason's to kill Pagan Min. There's only personal war before Sabal and Amita, but Sabal is the same as Pagan, Amita want to go in the future, what for me was a good choice. But Far Cry 5? We can walk away, Joseph's cult still burn all, kill the people's, steal what they want, if we try to kill him, he destroy all with fucking nukes, or, we can again walk away, but at the end we kill our friends. Wtf Ubi? We play more than 20 hours for saving people's in Montana and our "friends" and at the end all fucked up, cause crazy Joseph Seed have a right? So, in Far Cry 5 we haven't any good, or neutral(if we walk away, cult still destroy all) ending. Ubisoft kill this series. I know, in all Far Cry games we haven't really good ending's, but we have a choice, and the choice is this, what players want.
There were about 3 nuclear bombs at the end the amount of radiation that would be there would be insane
Thank fuck this is a standard for a far cry ending. There's enough "good guys won" ending in games already.
Alex Jaeger EXACTLY!!!
Jason Harden What would you prefer? Plus, there were several hints throughout the game that foreshadowed something bad happening in the end, it's not like it just came out of nowhere. It's the entire premise of the game.
Maybe far cry will take it farther next time and let us play as the bad guys.
Im just glad not everyone is still in their diapers expecting the best of the best. Realism is still fucking realism whether we like it or not lmao
Sir I know you want good guys lose sometimes but pls dont say "this is a standard ending for far cry..." ubisoft never set a standard ending for the game you just made it up
Dear People who are saying The endings don't make sense:
Let me tell you about a game called "Outlast"....
The ending in that didn't make any sense....But they made a DLC called "Whistleblower" which was even scarier and more fucked up than the original game ( Jesus Christ I still remember it ) which they kinda explained what happened / made a better ending.....
Now....I'm don't work in Ubisoft or either can predict the future but I'm 90% sure that Ubisoft.....is going to do the same thing.....
Because let's be honest.....People would so buy that.....and Ubisoft knows it too......
Sooooooooooo......I guess you should stop complaining and wait for a DLC or Someone explaining the endings in a video couple of months later ( kinda like Bo3 where the story and the endings didn't make any sense even tho I played it like 100 times Until like.... Couple of months later, I found video in RUclips where somebody explained it in 30 minutes or something.....)
What happens in the second ending? I have not played the game so I don't know what that his eyes turning red was...
He was brainwashed by the music when the sheriff turned on the radio
Mr. Spark93 Gaming so, he apparently killed them.
Yes
I think the nuke ending should have given the option to take down Joseph. Like kick him in the face while he's leering at you, then strangle him with your thighs, then sit and starve to death because you're handcuffed to the bed. Kinda goofy, but it grants the player the option to have some satisfaction. I don't think this is too goofy for this game however, this game literally has a diabetic bear as a companion.
Man! If they add another ending that is so good, Rook and his gang would be sending everything they got at them (if they didn't try to arrest Joseph Seed aka The Father) Even the *resistance* too, and the damn *National Guard* on their side against the Cultists. And none other than that, this is going to be "Waco Siege" all over again. This time it's 2.0 😮
That second ending was dark AS F O O K
Only good ending is to walk away and let NG smash lunatics.
About that Joseph: he is obviously mad but it appears he is a real prophet who saw something from the future (nuclear disaster).
The resist ending is brilliant the more you watch it.