Hey there , A fan of yours this side . I am really intrigued seeing those books behind you . Would you mind doing a Bookshelf tour? It would be great ❤
Yes, Griffiths's Classical Electrodynamics book is the best introductory text out there: he's written many popular papers on the foundations of CED. I'm not being funny but are your text books legit or Indian pirated copies?
All the textbooks in the video were bought from amazon. They look a bit different because these editions (which are significantly cheaper than the western ones) are printed and permitted to be sold only in the Indian subcontinent. Hope that helps :)
Hey Raj, I'm a gap year student from Rajasthan and aspiring for UManchester for sep2023. I've a question which I asked you on LinkedIn also that what UManchester is looking for in our essay. Like I'm applying for bachelors in mechanical engineering but I don't have experience in mech field but I do have experience in math and physics? Any advice?
Hi am hinghly intrested in physics but when i tried to study it with feynmen technique as i donot love to write much instead i can explain it after understanding a concept i donot know are notes compulsary if i want to get deep understanding of physics or not ?
It depends on what you define as a deeper understanding. If you want to understand the research papers and actually expansion in the field, I'd say you need to study properly. Because 'Math' after all, is the language of Physics. But if you want to just understand the Physics of it and not go into detail, then you'd be good if you just read over the concepts (or popular science novels)
@@rajwardhandeshmukh8480 no i want go into detail i love maths i also try to solve problems but at same time i hate writing notes on paper I just wanted know from someone who already studied physics alot that are notes essential or not
Hey there , A fan of yours this side . I am really intrigued seeing those books behind you . Would you mind doing a Bookshelf tour? It would be great ❤
Great video, would love to see a tour of library
Reference books for CSIR PHYSICAL SCIENCE video upload करें
Yes, Griffiths's Classical Electrodynamics book is the best introductory text out there: he's written many popular papers on the foundations of CED. I'm not being funny but are your text books legit or Indian pirated copies?
All the textbooks in the video were bought from amazon. They look a bit different because these editions (which are significantly cheaper than the western ones) are printed and permitted to be sold only in the Indian subcontinent. Hope that helps :)
What about HCV , path finder , Irodov ? Should one master this books first and then move onto university physics
Hey Raj,
I'm a gap year student from Rajasthan and aspiring for UManchester for sep2023. I've a question which I asked you on LinkedIn also that what UManchester is looking for in our essay. Like I'm applying for bachelors in mechanical engineering but I don't have experience in mech field but I do have experience in math and physics? Any advice?
what is your degree in college
Please I wish you share Mathmatices' source
Hi am hinghly intrested in physics but when i tried to study it with feynmen technique as i donot love to write much instead i can explain it after understanding a concept i donot know are notes compulsary if i want to get deep understanding of physics or not ?
It depends on what you define as a deeper understanding. If you want to understand the research papers and actually expansion in the field, I'd say you need to study properly. Because 'Math' after all, is the language of Physics.
But if you want to just understand the Physics of it and not go into detail, then you'd be good if you just read over the concepts (or popular science novels)
@@rajwardhandeshmukh8480 no i want go into detail i love maths i also try to solve problems but at same time i hate writing notes on paper
I just wanted know from someone who already studied physics alot that are notes essential or not
@@haiderabbaskazmi6660 varies from one person to another, but generally yes.
@@rajwardhandeshmukh8480 thank you