Vejas Liulevicius - How Communism, Fascism, and Nazism Differ
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 дек 2024
- Vejas Liulevicius explains how communism, fascism, and Nazism differ.
To support daily videos and receive special perks, please consider becoming a Liberty Vault member:
/ @liberty-vault
Original video:
• Vejas Liulevicius: Com...
Do you agree in the differences Vejas Liulevicius highlights?
Please subscribe and click the bell for daily liberty videos! If you enjoyed this video, you willl also like my other channel: www.youtube.com/@dissident_vault?sub_confirmation=1
Pretty good description, but I'd say the conflict between communism and fascism was more like a bitter rivalry between siblings or cousins fighting over the inheritance, so to speak, not a battle of polar opposites.
Nice explanation and history
This like saying that the Crips and Bloods aren't both violent drug gangs because one wears red and the other blue. Distinctions without a difference.
a good handle on everything seriously because some people are scared
Interesting presentation of german fascism, particularly in the utilization of accepted words for a different meaning. This is how the west uses "freedom" and "democracy", which in the west's eye are convenient terms to place itself on the moral high ground, while simultaneously hollowing out any original meaning of those words.
I got the ism blues.
I'm pretty happy with my Libertarianism! :)
Both left wing socialism, like that practiced in Cuba, the USSR, Venezuela and China under Mao and fascism, as practiced by Hitler and Mussolini are forms of socialism. Under socialism, the means of production is controlled by the government. Under left wing socialism, the business enterprises are run directly by government functionaries. Under fascism, the ownership of the factories is left nominally in the hands of the private business owners, but the owners are forced, under threat of violence, to produce what the fascist leaders require. But they amount to the same socialist thing: government control of the means of production. Left wing socialism is publicly atheist, and fascism is publicly racist. Both are expansionist. As a first rough cut, Fascism = socialism + racism.
Communism is technically an anarchy. A hippy commune or a family are communist. The government is supposed to whither away. It is supposed to be voluntary. The USSR was supposed to evolve into communism, but it never did, and never would have. It was the Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics. Communism does not last long in a group of over about 40 citizens. It doesn't scale. But socialism is evil. It denies self ownership. It's basic assumption is that the individual is owned by the collective, as represented by the government. It has resulted in death, poverty and misery everywhere it has been tried. True communism is no real threat. Let the hippies live on their farms. Doesn't hurt anyone.
Is increased taxes for the poor and tax deductions for the rich a form of capitalism? Is the flow of money and power to the few actually a form of fascism? Just some questions.