She is a trained prosecuting attorney, and when in that role, with her papers, strategy and facts lined up in front of her, she's pretty dangerous. As in the debate, or when as senator she grilled Republicans. But outside of that role she was lost. All she could do was laugh inappropriately for far too long.
You think she was a good prosecutor? Are you nuts? She was a poor excuse for an Attorney! Why do you think she went into politics? Her cross-examination of Brett Kavanaugh was an empty, dishonest argument. Kamala Harris was a poor attorney and an even worse Presidential candidate!!!
Maybe that could correlate how some of these teachers became radicals? Being used to having fluff, not keeping a basic standard above fluff, eventually lowering the standards over time.
She lost badly because she was completely incompetent and it was exposed. They had two choices ... hide and hope or put yourself out there. They chose the wrong one and this is how absolutely pathetic the Democratic Party is now.
Proof of DEI: black woman fails bar exam, still becomes AG of California! Yes, they’re DESPERATE to get rid of objective metrics, so that incompetence isn’t obviously DEI.
Interesting comparison to the Mirror Mirror episode of Star Trek. Kirk: "What I don't understand is how you were able to identify our counterparts so quickly." Mr. Spock: It was far easier for you, as civilized men, to behave like barbarians than it was for them as barbarians to behave like civilized men.
Seems about right. She's able to manipulate genuinely low IQ people with her rhetoric, but runs into a wall as soon as anyone with reasonable intelligence challenges her. I would imagine she's a good memorizer, hence why she was able to pass the bar(allegedly). But that doesn't make her smart, that's for sure...
Ehh... she made it through law school, was smart enough to sleep her way into SF DA, and was America's first dei vice president. She never achieved anything based on her credentials, but I give her credit for being what she is and achieving what she did. You say less than 105. She was vice president of the United States of America, what does that make you then, 75? 70? Not high enough to be the world's first dei vp.
Ben Carson said it best right after it became clear that she was not going to be challenged for the nomination, I'm paraphrasing ' this election is going to be a real test for the American people because we're going to see the media try to make this woman into a god' and that's exactly what happened. They tried to make her seem like the second coming of Susan B Anthony and Barack Obama and the fact is she's a CLOWN. My 15-year-old daughter asked if I thought she could win as soon as the news broke that Joe Biden was dropping out and that's exactly what I told my daughter "Nope. Harris is a clown. All high information people know this as a fact."
@@johnthomas1422definitely not matching up to her PhD parents and speaking of them, how many people in the world can say that both of their parents have PhD's? Okay. Now how many people in the world can say that both of their parents have PhD's, but they are middle class? What a CLOWN Harris is.
I would add that us conservatives can pretend to think emotionally like Libs, but they couldn't pretend to think logically because they don't know how. Or think as an individual vs a group thinker that the Libs are.
There’s a hard wire to be an NPC. It’s shocking sometimes because a person can be intelligent otherwise but lose all critical thinking in the political.
They had a terrible candidate and ran their campaign on fear and hate. And if they don’t learn their lesson they will continue to lose in the future. It’s not that hard to figure out.
Accept the facts. When she kicked out Christian from her rally when they said Jesus is lord she ended her campaign. Thank god she showed who she really is and for that matter what the democrats stand for.
I don't know if she's necessarily a stupid person. However, I think it's quite evident she's a horrible public speaker who can't think fast on what to say off the cuff. And even if someone is brilliant (which I highly doubt she's that either) not being a good public speaker and having no charisma should automatically disqualify you from running for high public office. (Assuming she's actually fairly intelligent) intelligent people who do not speak well and are not charismatic should be relegated to the behind-the-scenes types of jobs in politics rather than being a top candidate for a major political party, because they will ultimately lose 90+ percent of the time.
I think Victor Davis Hanson said it best when he described her as cunning but intellectually lazy. She can repeat the lines and say what they want her to say but she doesn't have in depth knowledge on things. It's like someone who skates by doing the minimum.
@@bozeeke she's a perfect representation of the rise of the midwit managerial class. Any actual breakdown of her time with and after Willie Brown shows a weak intellectual disposition and tendency to clash with those smarter than her that figure out her game. This is also in line with reports of how she treats staff in Washington, endlessly shifting blame and ranting at her underlings in semi daily drunken tirades. I suspect if she honestly passed the bar exam(which it's entirely possible she didn't considering the circumstances under which she tested) it was because she's good at memorization and not necessarily high IQ. She is the very definition of failing upwards, because her actual skill is backroom political shenanigans that somehow got her to rise from an incompetent DA widely known as Willie Brown's side piece into a presidential nominee despite receiving exactly zero votes in the primary after getting dressed down in public four years earlier and dropping out before Iowa. You gotta give her that, it's pretty impressive to spin such a pile of 💩 into a national political career. But too much wine and too many bars do eventually have their effect. And that's what we all witnessed for three plus months. America's wine mom...
That's what a lot of people tend to say who want to be honest brokers or attributes Joe Rogan's podcast to the end all be all. All his podcast does is 1.) Rogan is not in anyone's back pocket. It's long form and it cannot be edited. 2.) Most importantly it tells the viewer/listening audience who the guest is. And that's what it comes down to. The campaign (Harris) can say they tried to schedule her but it didn't work out. That's not how people with infinite free time and doaner funds work. You guys are literally receiving pay to win the election so that BS doesn't matter. Anyways. They couldn't manipulate the interview they wanted to do this because Kamala Harris is a horrible candidate.
She was caught on camera saying she had to make up ground with men(with Michigan's gov). Yet she doesn't go on Rogans podcast. This type of effort is why should would never win the primaries of her own party. I dont know if she is top25 in her own party.
The two candidates were not competing to “win” the popular vote, which wins you nothing. The electoral college gap was 58% to 42%. A total blowout by modern election standards. Tissue?
It was close to 2 percent, but I agree she didn't get crushed. There is a lot to wary about in this election for the Republicans, and they are acting like it was a blowout.
I think your figures are wrong here--the last time I read about the voting figures, it was 75 million to 67 million--not sure where you got your figures from. Are you getting paid to pop up here in the commentary to throw out clearly fake numbers??? Just asking....
It's almost in the Lottery Powerball epic proportions odds to spend $1.6 Billion on campaigning and still lose all 7 crucial States. Hell even Hillary Clinton won at least 1 Swing State in 2016. Harris was the first Democrat to lose (EXAMPLE) 'Dade County' Florida since Dwight D. Eisenhower won as a Republican in 1953 And keep in mind she had all the legacy News Stations (with the exception of Fox) pulling for her as well as the Obama's and every big celebrity endorsement - Swift, Beyonce, Springsteen ect She was a total failure and embarrassment 19 of 50 States she won - she was destroyed
@@Pine_Gap_Island bush was "stupid" enough to allow the 2008 financial crisis be blamed entirely on the republican party even though democrat party policies led to the crisis. bush was also spineless in that he never fought back against the media.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Do you agree with Mike Cernovich's assessment regarding why Kamala Harris lost?
For more liberty clips, subscribe to my channel and click the bell!
She is a trained prosecuting attorney, and when in that role, with her papers, strategy and facts lined up in front of her, she's pretty dangerous. As in the debate, or when as senator she grilled Republicans.
But outside of that role she was lost. All she could do was laugh inappropriately for far too long.
You think she was a good prosecutor? Are you nuts? She was a poor excuse for an Attorney! Why do you think she went into politics? Her cross-examination of Brett Kavanaugh was an empty, dishonest argument. Kamala Harris was a poor attorney and an even worse Presidential candidate!!!
The way Harris speaks is how I wrote essays in high school to meet the minimum word count requirement. Most of it was fluff.
Maybe that could correlate how some of these teachers became radicals? Being used to having fluff, not keeping a basic standard above fluff, eventually lowering the standards over time.
You're not alone all of us in public school were surrounded by midwits.
The post-mortem could be summed up like this: "they lied to themselves. Then they believed their own lies."
Oh so you mean so they are women. Yeah that checks out.
She lost badly because she was completely incompetent and it was exposed. They had two choices ... hide and hope or put yourself out there. They chose the wrong one and this is how absolutely pathetic the Democratic Party is now.
In what universe is Benedict Chump "qualified"?
Because as they have been saying - too big to rig. They couldn't intervene this time or else the whole world would have seen it.
Well stated--kudos!
@@bobbafett1849 who? Are you trying to be creative in saying trump? If so, he has not done a single thing treasonous. Not one.
Remember, Joe Biden chose her because he knew she would be terrible.
This is getting as bad as Hollywood rehashing every movie ever made. She was a horrible DEI VP pick, she's as dumb as a post. Move on.
Proof of DEI: black woman fails bar exam, still becomes AG of California! Yes, they’re DESPERATE to get rid of objective metrics, so that incompetence isn’t obviously DEI.
One word~ UNQUALIFIED.
And still got over 49% versus Trump less than 51%.
I'd say the voters don't rank qualifications very highly.
They're saying: one word, midwit.
There's a difference
How about: dishonest, incompetent, unqualified, and unbounded by good government, economic practicalities, and common sense!
Interesting comparison to the Mirror Mirror episode of Star Trek.
Kirk: "What I don't understand is how you were able to identify our counterparts so quickly."
Mr. Spock: It was far easier for you, as civilized men, to behave like barbarians than it was for them as barbarians to behave like civilized men.
I like that quote. But it does not apply to psychopaths. They can fit in so well.
105 is way too generous 🤡
Seems about right. She's able to manipulate genuinely low IQ people with her rhetoric, but runs into a wall as soon as anyone with reasonable intelligence challenges her. I would imagine she's a good memorizer, hence why she was able to pass the bar(allegedly). But that doesn't make her smart, that's for sure...
Take the zero away and the math works.
Ehh... she made it through law school, was smart enough to sleep her way into SF DA, and was America's first dei vice president. She never achieved anything based on her credentials, but I give her credit for being what she is and achieving what she did. You say less than 105. She was vice president of the United States of America, what does that make you then, 75? 70? Not high enough to be the world's first dei vp.
Ben Carson said it best right after it became clear that she was not going to be challenged for the nomination, I'm paraphrasing ' this election is going to be a real test for the American people because we're going to see the media try to make this woman into a god' and that's exactly what happened. They tried to make her seem like the second coming of Susan B Anthony and Barack Obama and the fact is she's a CLOWN.
My 15-year-old daughter asked if I thought she could win as soon as the news broke that Joe Biden was dropping out and that's exactly what I told my daughter "Nope. Harris is a clown. All high information people know this as a fact."
@@johnthomas1422definitely not matching up to her PhD parents and speaking of them, how many people in the world can say that both of their parents have PhD's? Okay. Now how many people in the world can say that both of their parents have PhD's, but they are middle class?
What a CLOWN Harris is.
I would add that us conservatives can pretend to think emotionally like Libs, but they couldn't pretend to think logically because they don't know how. Or think as an individual vs a group thinker that the Libs are.
Great observation. Thanks for pointing it out.
There’s a hard wire to be an NPC. It’s shocking sometimes because a person can be intelligent otherwise but lose all critical thinking in the political.
She’s a transparent candidate and we saw right through her. Puppet
They had a terrible candidate and ran their campaign on fear and hate. And if they don’t learn their lesson they will continue to lose in the future. It’s not that hard to figure out.
Walz just reinforced that Harris was a woke leftist radical.
Not to mention that she's the most non-serious person in the public eye. I've never seen anything like it.
Accept the facts. When she kicked out Christian from her rally when they said Jesus is lord she ended her campaign. Thank god she showed who she really is and for that matter what the democrats stand for.
Some say it was when she went on the view and said she wouldn’t change anything about the current status of the country
Because she was a horrible candidate with nothing to offer….🤷♂️
How about her Word Salad Spewing & Repulsive Cackling 🤔
Typical high level professional woman. They get by on their looks so what do they care.
@sole__doubt
Yup, Good for Fashion Parade Photos. Empty headed!
Spot on.
I don't know if she's necessarily a stupid person. However, I think it's quite evident she's a horrible public speaker who can't think fast on what to say off the cuff. And even if someone is brilliant (which I highly doubt she's that either) not being a good public speaker and having no charisma should automatically disqualify you from running for high public office. (Assuming she's actually fairly intelligent) intelligent people who do not speak well and are not charismatic should be relegated to the behind-the-scenes types of jobs in politics rather than being a top candidate for a major political party, because they will ultimately lose 90+ percent of the time.
I think Victor Davis Hanson said it best when he described her as cunning but intellectually lazy. She can repeat the lines and say what they want her to say but she doesn't have in depth knowledge on things. It's like someone who skates by doing the minimum.
@@Hipshair Again, I don't know if that's the case. Largely because she's a terrible communicator verbally.
Nixon had no charisma and was a great president, minus the Watergate scandal. His paranoia shot him in the foot.
@@bozeeke she's a perfect representation of the rise of the midwit managerial class. Any actual breakdown of her time with and after Willie Brown shows a weak intellectual disposition and tendency to clash with those smarter than her that figure out her game. This is also in line with reports of how she treats staff in Washington, endlessly shifting blame and ranting at her underlings in semi daily drunken tirades. I suspect if she honestly passed the bar exam(which it's entirely possible she didn't considering the circumstances under which she tested) it was because she's good at memorization and not necessarily high IQ. She is the very definition of failing upwards, because her actual skill is backroom political shenanigans that somehow got her to rise from an incompetent DA widely known as Willie Brown's side piece into a presidential nominee despite receiving exactly zero votes in the primary after getting dressed down in public four years earlier and dropping out before Iowa. You gotta give her that, it's pretty impressive to spin such a pile of 💩 into a national political career. But too much wine and too many bars do eventually have their effect. And that's what we all witnessed for three plus months. America's wine mom...
That's what a lot of people tend to say who want to be honest brokers or attributes Joe Rogan's podcast to the end all be all.
All his podcast does is 1.) Rogan is not in anyone's back pocket. It's long form and it cannot be edited. 2.) Most importantly it tells the viewer/listening audience who the guest is.
And that's what it comes down to. The campaign (Harris) can say they tried to schedule her but it didn't work out. That's not how people with infinite free time and doaner funds work. You guys are literally receiving pay to win the election so that BS doesn't matter. Anyways. They couldn't manipulate the interview they wanted to do this because Kamala Harris is a horrible candidate.
She was caught on camera saying she had to make up ground with men(with Michigan's gov). Yet she doesn't go on Rogans podcast. This type of effort is why should would never win the primaries of her own party. I dont know if she is top25 in her own party.
Authenticity..
Cackle Queen of 'Joy' & Dreams 😅
That would be “dreams, aspirations and ambitions”. Like trying to get the word count up in an undergrad essay.
Camela can walk out of the WH with many cloeset full of Designer WWE Undertaker Suits 😅
Team blue seems to think their problem is they didnt get their message out properly. It did and it was the message that people rejected.
I hope the socialists don't change a thing
Lost by less than 1%. Yeah she really got crushed.
The two candidates were not competing to “win” the popular vote, which wins you nothing. The electoral college gap was 58% to 42%. A total blowout by modern election standards. Tissue?
It was close to 2 percent, but I agree she didn't get crushed. There is a lot to wary about in this election for the Republicans, and they are acting like it was a blowout.
@Yup Trump won. And now he has to do all the things he said he would 🤣
What's the difference between North Korea and South Korea
One is spelled with a S & one with a N..
Kamala doesn't know the difference
Harris Bush and Biden are irregularly dumb😂😂😂❤❤
This guy is saying everything I was thinking
We know why stop giving her air time.
Her IQ is NOT 105. Try 95. 😅
Plus TIM WALZ
She lost badly?
77 Mil to 75 Mil ??
I think your figures are wrong here--the last time I read about the voting figures, it was 75 million to 67 million--not sure where you got your figures from. Are you getting paid to pop up here in the commentary to throw out clearly fake numbers??? Just asking....
Badly?
It's almost in the Lottery Powerball epic proportions odds to spend $1.6 Billion on campaigning and still lose all 7 crucial States. Hell even Hillary Clinton won at least 1 Swing State in 2016. Harris was the first Democrat to lose (EXAMPLE) 'Dade County' Florida since Dwight D. Eisenhower won as a Republican in 1953
And keep in mind she had all the legacy News Stations (with the exception of Fox) pulling for her as well as the Obama's and every big celebrity endorsement - Swift, Beyonce, Springsteen ect
She was a total failure and embarrassment
19 of 50 States she won - she was destroyed
My name is kamala I'm she or her this is a blue jacket
lol. w bush may have above average intelligence but he was still stupid. guess i was stupider because i voted for him twice.
Now that's funny! But to your credit, I don't think his opponent during those 2 elections was any better...
I voted for him, too. What choice did we have?
Bush was not stupid. He played stupid. He played it well. And Iraqi oil fields are operated by US/Western firms.
@@Pine_Gap_Island bush was "stupid" enough to allow the 2008 financial crisis be blamed entirely on the republican party even though democrat party policies led to the crisis. bush was also spineless in that he never fought back against the media.
This guy sucks