CRAZY, murderous, rapist-30 years in prison for him
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 апр 2024
- Welcome to our RUclips channel, where we explore and analyze thrilling and tense legal cases. From famous cases to shocking and mysterious ones, we will take you into the world of law with creative debates and in-depth analysis.
On our channel, you will learn about fundamental legal principles, procedural processes, and how the legal system operates. We will also analyze and discuss special cases, from classic cases to the most controversial ones, providing insight into legal procedures and court decisions.
Join us in unraveling and deciphering the mysteries of law in the upcoming videos. Don't forget to subscribe and hit the notification bell to not miss any new videos from us. Thank you for joining us and let's start this exciting journey of exploration together!
#judge #law&crime
Another click bait. 13 years not 30. I won't be watching again.
Click bait every single time on your titles
Last clickbait. You’ve lost me 😡
30 or 13?
Clickbait bs headline. Sick of this page. Unsubscribed
I'm done too - bye!
13!
13 is even worse
Same lost me
Can't hear her, breaking up.
I'm a recent sub & big fan of your coverage, especially of The Queen, Judge Boyd!❤👑❤️👑❤️
Pile of misleading garbage! You sub for the clickbait bulshit? Give me a break
the more that I watch this I notice that people are willing to plea deal instead of a jury trial or have the judge be the jury ......which is very stupid, because in a Jury trial if your lawyer is skillful enough may get you off, this just shows that lawyers have no litigation skills, true they know the law because they passed the bar but don't know how to speak or perform in front of a jury,
Yeah but if they find him guilty the jury would more then likely give him the max my guess would be he has a public defender probably would want to hire your own attorney for something this serious
You don't know much about Texas juries, do you?
Not to mention. It's likely, through the discovery process, the defense lawyer said a jury will MORE than likely find them guilty. When there is enough evidence or video pretty much showing the crime, not even F. Lee Bailey or Johnny Cochran can get them off.
@@aodhhanswtor7252 ...plea deals are actually the maximum a defendant will get regardless. the D.A and the Defense attorneys know this, on one side they get rid of cases quickly, and on the other side the Defense Attorneys know that most of their clients don't have enough money to pay them, that's if it's a private Attorney a public just like the D.A. process them as quickly as possible........if you go in front of the jury you have 12 people who will listen to your case, they will listen what happens that day, and for the most part will problem give the same sentence or a lighter sentence.....the con job is getting a plea deal, most of these people are not educated enough and the D.A knows that....
@@warriordog4094 you are absolutely INCORRECT. plea deals are NOT the maximum sentence a defendant can or will recieve if they go to trail they will almost always get the max that their charge allows. Thats the "benefit" of a plea. What you state is actually opposite of the truth
@@warriordog4094 No way for a crime like this he will 100% get the max in a jury trial and when its a felony I dont think they can grant probation only yhe judge can
Another thing this judge does that’s stupid that once the parenting classes are completed then 200 hours of community service are waived. I get the motivation but it’s just stupid
Not watching any of these again. CLICKBAIT.
boring