@@yourcasualfinn2213 according to Technical Memorandum ORO-T-117 "SURVEY OF ALLIED TANK CASUALTIES" , gunfire "...exacted the highest over-all percentage (54%) of tank casualties in all theaters." This would be around 1/2, (50%), the value you gave (4/5) would equal to 80%. First off, you are wrong on a numerical basis. Second, it depends on whether you define disabled as destroyed or separate. Out of 449 vehicles destroyed, 51% were due to enemy fire, so you are not wrong on that. However, out of 588 disabled vehicles, 52% was due to artillery & mortar, with direct fire being 28%. These are all sampled from battle casualties of the 6th Armored Division from the period of July 18, 1945 --> May 8, 1945. However, more vehicles were disabled than destroyed, then affirming the fact that you're wrong on a numerical basis. This is pretty consistent across most of the charts, with disabled and repairable vehicles being higher than destroyed vehicles.
Fun Fact: In WWII M4 Shermans encountered Panzerkampfwagen VI "Tigers" a total of 3 times and won a total of 3 times; two of which were from the Tiger being shot up, and the third of it breaking down mid-combat!
Tiger 201 blew up the Pershing fittingly nicknamed "Fireball" before reversing on a wall and getting stuck. Stone wall confirmed more lethal against a Tiger than a Pershing.
translatioin= "Most of the Nazi tanks destroyed were destroyed by American tanks. However, the Nazis left several times more tanks than the destroyed ones on the road and escaped barefoot. Most of the damage to US tanks was caused by anti-aircraft guns, mines, rockets, and various engineering obstacles."
The flaws of the Tiger II included: Stupidly heavy. Overengineered. Easily flanked. A transmission that broke down constantly. Poorly welded armor sometimes. Is it really the best tank? The Sherman was so effective that i don't know any of its flaws, other than the earlier models had a transmission worse than the HVSS transmission.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
Everything changed when M26 Pershing arrives:
That sherman with the tracks destroyed was a mine...
I know I read it I just wanted to add
Sooooo…… basically all of them
4/5 of them had been destroyed by enemy fire
@@LordShockwave23 So this is intentional misinformation.
@@yourcasualfinn2213 according to Technical Memorandum ORO-T-117 "SURVEY OF ALLIED TANK CASUALTIES" , gunfire "...exacted the highest over-all percentage (54%) of tank casualties in all theaters." This would be around 1/2, (50%), the value you gave (4/5) would equal to 80%. First off, you are wrong on a numerical basis. Second, it depends on whether you define disabled as destroyed or separate. Out of 449 vehicles destroyed, 51% were due to enemy fire, so you are not wrong on that. However, out of 588 disabled vehicles, 52% was due to artillery & mortar, with direct fire being 28%. These are all sampled from battle casualties of the 6th Armored Division from the period of July 18, 1945 --> May 8, 1945. However, more vehicles were disabled than destroyed, then affirming the fact that you're wrong on a numerical basis. This is pretty consistent across most of the charts, with disabled and repairable vehicles being higher than destroyed vehicles.
as long as the transmission works
Hans , we need better transmission
Man, uptiers hit hard back then.
I played 3 match of war thunder,4.0 and 5.7,all of them was uptier and i had a booster on,but luckily didn't die 2 times at the start of the match
The tracks on the third to last Sherman tho 💀
a city of marble? my brother in christ berlin was a city of rubble by the end.
M4 Sherman: Why you bully me and not anyone else
King Tiger: COS U WEAK BOI
@@stckre M4 Sherman: Didn’t I kill you by ramming you once?
Sherman firefly: the hell man?
"A german tank is worth 10 allied tanks!"
"Good thing we brought 20"
-some quote i saw somewhere idk idgaf
Half of them were destroyed by mines 💀
Pershing: are you dumb?
The Pershing was still no match for a Tiger 2
@@dantel.7785atleast it didn't usually break down commonly 😉
@@dantel.7785Tell me, who won again?
@@Molten_Slugger that is true
@@munastronaut8147 of course the Allies did, but to say it was mostly due to their superior engineering over the Germans would be a lie
Fun Fact: In WWII M4 Shermans encountered Panzerkampfwagen VI "Tigers" a total of 3 times and won a total of 3 times; two of which were from the Tiger being shot up, and the third of it breaking down mid-combat!
Did u inspire it from me? I have almost the same edit and i posted it earlier! And about King Tiger too!
The problem. Of mines can be fixed with sherman crab
transmission and every other mechanical part?
m26e1 pershing: i'd like to ruin this man's whole carrier
Tiger 201 blew up the Pershing fittingly nicknamed "Fireball" before reversing on a wall and getting stuck.
Stone wall confirmed more lethal against a Tiger than a Pershing.
@@jonny2954 that's more of a tiger's problem
Tiger I stock in wot 😂😂😂
T95: No 🗿
IS3
Bet
Are you kidding? The IS-3 is a post war tank. It never saw combat.
팍트.
격파 나치군 전차 대부분 미군 전차에 격파당한다.
하지만 나치군은 격파당한 전차의 몇 배나 더많은 전차들을 길바닥에 유기 자폭시키고 맨발로 도주한다.
미군 전차 피해 대부분 대전자포, 지뢰 , 로켓 각종 공병 장애물에 의한 피해였다.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂Wo hast du denn diese Weisheit her?! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤦🏻♂️⚫⚪🔴⚔️🛡️💪🏻
translatioin=
"Most of the Nazi tanks destroyed were destroyed by American tanks.
However, the Nazis left several times more tanks than the destroyed ones on the road and escaped barefoot.
Most of the damage to US tanks was caused by anti-aircraft guns, mines, rockets, and various engineering obstacles."
This is a lie. Tanks were only 20% of what other tanks engaged. They were mostly destroyed by anti-tank guns or infantry.
Oh fuck
Su 152...
Did u inpire it by me? Answer me please.
no
@-FORWARDedits-oh😑
Shame on the German fascists
Shermin panza 🗑🗑🗑💩💩 tigr 2 panza 🇩🇪👑
Sherman did better than the King tiger
The flaws of the Tiger II included:
Stupidly heavy.
Overengineered.
Easily flanked.
A transmission that broke down constantly.
Poorly welded armor sometimes.
Is it really the best tank?
The Sherman was so effective that i don't know any of its flaws, other than the earlier models had a transmission worse than the HVSS transmission.
There was a scandal over two gay German officers (both high-ranking) in WW1