Nuclear Renaissance: AP1000, Oral Presentation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 дек 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @mdombroski
    @mdombroski Год назад +3

    The small footprint surpriaed me.

  • @elija6582
    @elija6582 2 года назад +4

    Very good presentation, thank you

  • @jayethompson3414
    @jayethompson3414 Год назад +1

    I worked on an SFP Fukushima mod and went to almost every plant east of the Mississippi. 2 were the same, and it seemed at times that different people worked on different parts of the facility and they assembled it onsite, eg open a door and there is a tripping hazard right in the opening.

  • @waywardgeologist2520
    @waywardgeologist2520 8 месяцев назад +1

    12:38 spent fuel, most of the uranium has not been used up, given its not a fast reactor.

  • @fredyyfredfreddy
    @fredyyfredfreddy 3 месяца назад

    Hopefully we will get these in Sweden soon

  • @KieraCameron514
    @KieraCameron514 7 месяцев назад

    I am so glad the Vogtle units are finished and running, but I hope they are the last water-based reactors built. From now on, we should build molten salt reactors.

  • @3SLBK
    @3SLBK 3 года назад +7

    AP1000 soon in Ukraine 😎

  • @waywardgeologist2520
    @waywardgeologist2520 8 месяцев назад

    10:58 standby Diesel?

  • @grantchang81976
    @grantchang81976 Год назад

    the 1000MW capacity of the AP1000 is hitting my mark.

  • @gunnarkaestle9405
    @gunnarkaestle9405 2 года назад +1

    1:20 If the AP1000 is a simpler construction and has a smaller footprint, why is the construction much more expensive than the older design? Westinghouse went bankrupt because of the construction problems and cost overruns at NPP Summer and NPP Vogtle. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgil_C._Summer_Nuclear_Generating_Station#Units_2_and_3

    • @BringJoyNow
      @BringJoyNow 2 года назад +2

      Bureaucracy combined with few project accepted (for any industry, the more project you have the better the econkomics for chain production)

    • @darrinkinney2268
      @darrinkinney2268 2 года назад +3

      I laugh every time I read that the reactor is modular and cheaper.

    • @jesush.christ6184
      @jesush.christ6184 2 года назад +9

      The contractor botched construction. Once Bechtel came in, progress has been fine. But a ton of work had to be redone.
      Like, there's a reason China and Poland are building more AP1000 reactors even with the vogtle disaster

    • @otm646
      @otm646 8 месяцев назад

      ​@@darrinkinney2268 Modular is substantially less expensive, look at the 20+ reactors China is building right now.

  • @waywardgeologist2520
    @waywardgeologist2520 8 месяцев назад

    13:17 what happens on day 4?

  • @ДиафильмыЛавкрафта

    Could you please tell me how tall the auxiliary building is? It is necessary for the graduation project, but I can not find this parameter anywhere.

  • @fffuaaoe4167
    @fffuaaoe4167 2 года назад

    Can you explain the AP1000 identification curve?

  • @rockyhighwayroad7365
    @rockyhighwayroad7365 Год назад

    Which one is oral?

  • @MrNagant007
    @MrNagant007 7 месяцев назад

    No gum when presenting.

  • @YellowRambler
    @YellowRambler 6 месяцев назад

    Renaissance? It’s still a PWR.