The 777 Maneuvre is known as a Derry Wing Over named after Dehavilland test pilot John Derry DFC (who coincidentally passed away 70 years ago in September during an Air Show). It allows a high speed turn to be made and to bleed off excess speed at the same time. Obviously it wouldnt be undertaken with passengers on board but as an air display trick its pretty impressive.
Lot of people doubt about them forgeting the landing gear. In the video we can clearly hear the first pilot saying in french "Tu n'as pas sorti le train ? (you didn't set the gear down ?)", and the second to answer "Non (No)". So, yes, they forgot :)
I couldn’t hear anything over the blaring alarm, which to me suggests that they should have realized something was wrong before they hit the ground and slid
Are we all watching the same video? The gear-up landing was made in a single engine-prop airplane with two people in the front seats and at least one person in the backseats, manning the camera. Although only one needed to be Pilot-in-Command, any of the people aboard could have called for gear down or a go-around. The alarm noise was to loud to determine whether such a call was made. Based on the steep angle of the final approach, I am going to assume that this was an emergency landing. The prop could have just been windmilling without power. But, that is conjecture.
there must have been some kind of failure in the 3rd vid.. these guys came in way too high imo and i guess they where well aware that the gear wasn't down
If my landing gear wasnt coming down my first thought isnt get the plane on the ground as soon as possible, its more like go around and try to troubleshoot, I dont think they were. if you watch videos of any planned gear up landings the pilots bring it down as easy as possible, not do this XD not to mention if they knew the gear was up they would have shut off the engine right before touchdown to avoid the prop strike they had.
That 777 was not inverted, barely came to a 90 degree bank angle. If you do this wing over correctly you can go up to 120 - 130 degrees, but since over 90 degrees is defined as aerobatics (for which the 777 is not cleared) they have to keep it at this. When doing this manoeuvre you need airspeed to pull up the nose, thus bleeding the airspeed and then you can roll in which causes the nose to drop again. Then you gently roll out and you are back on speed again. It looks more impressive than it actually is. And the guys that forgot the landing gear ? What the heck were they thinking ? What is that annoying sound we cannot identify ? In any case there is a way you quickly find out you forgot the landing gear. If all of a sudden it takes a lot more power to taxi, the marshaller became a lot taller all of a sudden and the landing roll is a lot shorter...............chances are that you forgot something. 😀
It's a wingover. But some idiot limey above is trying to call it by some idiot limey name (just like they tried to steal the "Khe Sahn approach and call it the Sarajevo Approach"
I’m not convinced that the 777 got anywhere near a 90° bank angle. To me (a professional videographer and commercial aviation enthusiast), it’s clear that the person filming tilted their phone/camera during the turn to make it look more impressive than it actually was.
Yeah, I thought the same thing, as the plane banked, the videographer simply turned his camera in the opposite angular direction, creating the illusion of a much steeper bank angle on the 777.
All good and all, but Denzel taught us all that a jetliner can indeed fly inverted 😂. All jokes aside, I did watch a video years ago that did a feasibility analysis on whether or not it was possible and/or practical for such a large jetliner to go inverted in any scenario. Unfortunately, I can't for the life of me remember what the conclusion of that analysis was 😂.
@@Aquascape_Dreaming it has been done before: Boeing test pilot Tex Johnston barrel rolled a 707 over Lake Washington during the Seafair hydroplane races as a stunt back in 1955, of which there is video. He did it because there were airline executives in town for Seafair. He got called into Boeing President Bill Allen’s office and, when asked “what the hell he was doing” pulling a stunt like that, he replied “selling airplanes.” 😂
@@Three_Random_Words and this comes from what factual statement ? Incident report for this aircraft says the same thing...... both the ASN and the French Gov report.
1:35 Kind of surprised me to see an US registered tail number on the Avianca Aircraft. FAA says it belongs to a Trustee Bank in Salt Lake City, though. Maybe Avianca's credit card didn't go through.
I did some work on a 707 once which was effectively a luxury business jet - at the time it was hired by some wealthy people from the Middle East. We weren't allowed to go aft of the forward door, but I can say the cockpit was in immaculate condition and we were required to put on overshoes before entering the aircraft. The crew said the aircraft was owned by a holding company in Miami.
Most of Avianca's Aircraft are leased, which entitles them to US Registration, or if they are owned by the airline, they are registered in the US mainly for tax purposes and equity handling by its owners.
Unless it was registered to a bankruptcy trustee (which would likely be in a chapter 11 reorg so the plane could stay in service); it more likely than not was simply the manner in which the plane was financed and registered under finance lien.
The 777 maneuver is helpful if you ever get a stuck nose-up stabilizer or elevator to manage altitude, speed, and avoid stalling while planning actions. Usually, a 70-degree bank will get the job done as well.
I'm all for airshow shenanigans but that last clip was really unnecessarily unsafe - straddling the very edge of the paved runway like that, it would be very easy to send loose chunks of pavement or all kinds of FOD flying into the crowd at high speed. It would at least have been less irresponsible to do it centered on solid ground 🤷♂️
Some airplanes have a big fat L on the left power lever and a big fat R on the right lever. And in their manuals there are no references to No 1 or No 2. Or port or starboard. Just left right.
I'm sorry, but how? Just how do you forget to lower your landing gear? It's on your check list for crying out loud and speaking of loud, that loud sound is the plane telling you...hey dummy, you fogot your landing gear. Man if I was Lurch from the Adams family I would have that face.
2:10 For all who don’t believe they forgot the landing gear… Listen to them: „As-tu baissé le train?“ - „Non!“ that translates to „Did you lower the gear?“ - „No!“ They simply forgot it. Why? We all do not know either! Could be anything. But during my training, my FI always reminded me to go around in any case of uncertainty! And still those things happen 🤷🏽♂️
When the title of the video says that a Boeing 777 flies upside down, then there is no Boeing 777 flying upside down, I got dissapointed. Please be more accurate with your video description. Great video otherwise!
It's not that steep, it's more that the runway is at a great angle, it's an altiport, in France we have some in the mountains, runways usually are at a 16% slope so it looks really steep even when you are on a flat approach. A special qualification is required, they may had this for a short period of time, so that's maybe the cause to them forgetting to lower the gear
Neither flies it upside down as the title implements nor does it even nearly. Show the video with ground references und you can see that this was at maximum a 90 degree angle. Normally I like this 3 Minutes of Aviation but this one is a big thumbs down, sorry!
You will not see an Airbus airliner do the 777 maneuvers unless the pilot turns off the flight control computers since it will not give the pilot permission to exceed 67 degrees of bank.
Due to the camera tele-lens compression nobody can really say what the bank angle of that 777 was. That’s the trick of these videos. Lens compression makes everything look a lot more impressive !!
I guess aviation enthusiasts are not very good at geometry. I always find it funny how a 40° pitch becomes "vertical take-off", and how an 80° bank angle becomes "flying upside down". :) Don't take me wrong, I'm a pilot and aviation enthusiast myself.
Yeah you probably would get some yaw but a pilot will use every tool at his disposal to stop the plane. Especially if you divert and are above your landing weight.
One engine TRev is a piece of cake. Though open, it’s doubtful they added much thrust. Reverse is used commensurate with centerline control. Too much yaw? Modulate Rev.
I like how they always show the thumbnail vid in the beginning so people pay attention to the other vids instead of just thinking about the thumbnail. Props to you man, props to you. Get it props like propellers 😂
@@weewg2 you are new here, that statement is all that matta is capable of trolling with. for almost a year now, that is all he posts, ive proven him wrong 4 times now also :)
but it is actually not a good feature the fact that boeings allow it to be done. Airbusses don't, they limit the angle, no matter how much you try. And this has obvious safety reasons, besides, it will never be recquired, hence, hydraulic systems rely on gravity to work. So to turn an airplane like this can damage fuel and hydraulic management.
TY,,,,,,WOW 1st class incredible very interesting super kool ,1st class great info.,, AAAAAAAAAAA++++++++++++ again great video I liked it a lot ,keep up the great work
Regarding the second clip; the Avianca Boeing 787 with an engine failure, you really need to keep the references to 'Engine No. 1’ and 'Engine No. 2' (including 'Engines No. 3 & No. 4' for quad-jets). “Left hand engine” tells us nothing. Who’s left? I would have thought that with you guys being an aviation channel, this wouldn’t need to be said.
I think it was the 'Trinidad GT' made by the (now defunct) French group called Société de Construction d'Avions de Tourisme et d'Affaires Or shortened to SOCATA. (Later names were DAHER-SOCATA, EADS Socata).
That was in the good old days when Boeing could actually build planes. The 777 was their best. Boeing in 2024: "Oops....the doors are falling off the plane."
"777 flies upside down" - shows video of 90 degree bank - that is not upside down! -------- 787 - only one heat blur trail behind right engine, saw that before i saw the reverser opening. -------- How the hell do you forget your landing gear with that blaring alarm in your ears? Original video states they had hundreds of hours flying..... not buying that. -------- Always fun getting a 200MPH jet blast in your face right?!?!? Ooops - matta & now Three Random Words - sorry - and i'll keep on doing this, you just get my comment posted right back to the top of the page each time.
The "almost upside down" maneuver was neither "upside down", nor "almost". It was merely just about overhead, giving that impression when doing a high-bank turn.
the first one looks like it should be in one of those "its unfortunate that we could'nt fly yesterday, but of course safetey is a priority at boeing" then it shows a bunch of mistakes etc. that Boeing was yeah anyway like Alaska 1282, lion air 610, 777 vertical takeoff etc.
The 777 did nothing more exotic than a simple wingover: in this case a climbing turn to bleed off airspeed to gear speed and configure to land. Nothing exotic about that. The pilot in the L-39 has his right mainmount in the dirt off the taxiway. Not very impressive: more money than piloting (or taxiing) skills
So... Didn't fly inverted. Why not just title. 777 almost flies inverted? Still grabs ya and isn't a lie. I'm really sick of this channel doing this stuff. May switch to the other dude.
Boeing airplanes used to be high quality when they had the machinists building the majority of the plane. Now Boeing is outsourcing 60% of the airplane to low cost low quality suppliers.
The Trip 7 would've been so much better with some visual ques to reference just how extreme that angle was! You can also see the "Belly landing" was due to having just nose gear green (down) and 2 non illuminated lights on the panel... The tri-gear wheels only the nose gear deployed
If you check the original video for the gear-up landing and put subtitles on, the passenger and pilot get out and you can hear them discussing it, coming out of the aircraft swearing and saying "we were so busy monitoring the plane ahead I didn't even notice". It was *not* done on purpose.
The B777 did not fly " upside down " or inverted to use the correct term, it`s a very steep bank, just over 90 degrees, but no where near inverted which would be 180 degrees. Half truth from the uploader.
![Tee Grizzley - Blow for Blow (feat. J. Cole) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wNLN5xsx5dc/mqdefault.jpg)
There’s no way they forgot to lower the landing gear with all those alarms going off
*there’s no way they FORGOT to lower the landing gear”. Your original statement means they forgot and it was inevitable.
@@Lozzie74 🤓
it's difficult to concentrate with all those alarms going off
@@Lozzie74 i ought to give your nerd ass a swirlie
@@antoineroquentin2297 those alarms are SPECIFICALLY reminding them - PUT YOUR DAMN WHEELS DOWN.
The ldg gear warning horn sounds, they didn’t forget
Tunnel vision xD
@@skorpiox3467 Thats not how it works lol
They were coming in pretty hot, too.
@@martyyoung3611 yes that was the cause, you can see the report on the BEA in France, it's a very famous exemple of focus on single task ;)
Could you explain why they did lower the gears?
The 777 Maneuvre is known as a Derry Wing Over named after Dehavilland test pilot John Derry DFC (who coincidentally passed away 70 years ago in September during an Air Show). It allows a high speed turn to be made and to bleed off excess speed at the same time. Obviously it wouldnt be undertaken with passengers on board but as an air display trick its pretty impressive.
yes. but it’s not upside down, right? this video title is misleading.
Loved reading this Chris and Thanks Much for taking a few moments to share! Cheers
A 1g maneuver when performed correctly. No passengers, no problem.
@@g_pazzini All of the titles that are posted by 3 Minutes of Aviation are misleading. Typically you will see something like: Plane flies too low.
@@Aereaux Took the words right out of my mouth
Wow. You’d think that alarm would clue them in.
I don't think they forgot. Probably a different issue.
@@kekke2000 that was my thought
Plot twist: everyone on board was deaf.
@@kekke2000 they definitely forgot, read the description on the original link.
Obviously not
So glad I was wearing my headphones at 1:36 😂😂😂
Music to the ears😄
@@sailaab Music to what's left of one's ears ...
Lot of people doubt about them forgeting the landing gear. In the video we can clearly hear the first pilot saying in french "Tu n'as pas sorti le train ? (you didn't set the gear down ?)", and the second to answer "Non (No)". So, yes, they forgot :)
I can barely make out the comunication..
Merci. :-)
I couldn’t hear anything over the blaring alarm, which to me suggests that they should have realized something was wrong before they hit the ground and slid
There is only one pilot in a Trinidad. Single pilot complex single = no second pilot.
Are we all watching the same video? The gear-up landing was made in a single engine-prop airplane with two people in the front seats and at least one person in the backseats, manning the camera. Although only one needed to be Pilot-in-Command, any of the people aboard could have called for gear down or a go-around. The alarm noise was to loud to determine whether such a call was made.
Based on the steep angle of the final approach, I am going to assume that this was an emergency landing. The prop could have just been windmilling without power. But, that is conjecture.
there must have been some kind of failure in the 3rd vid.. these guys came in way too high imo and i guess they where well aware that the gear wasn't down
This is a old video and clearly in original video the guys in the plane just forgot to lower the lnd gear; perfect example of cognitive tunneling
If my landing gear wasnt coming down my first thought isnt get the plane on the ground as soon as possible, its more like go around and try to troubleshoot, I dont think they were. if you watch videos of any planned gear up landings the pilots bring it down as easy as possible, not do this XD not to mention if they knew the gear was up they would have shut off the engine right before touchdown to avoid the prop strike they had.
Runway has 7 to 9% upslope and there are mountains all around. This is why they appear to approach too high.
Yes, there was a failure. It was an open circuit between the ears.
That was nowhere near inverted or upside down......
No AeroSucre today means double feature next time 😁
They are training to appear on 3 minutes of maritime
@@mattafakkah Are you a bot or what? Stop spamming!
@@Credt444 He migrated over here from one of the other channels. Unluckily for us.
@@Credt444 no, he is just a 6 year old's mind in a tractor pipe loving german farmer, he likes flesh to metal intercourse.
🤣😂🤣
That 777 was not inverted, barely came to a 90 degree bank angle. If you do this wing over correctly you can go up to 120 - 130 degrees, but since over 90 degrees is defined as aerobatics (for which the 777 is not cleared) they have to keep it at this.
When doing this manoeuvre you need airspeed to pull up the nose, thus bleeding the airspeed and then you can roll in which causes the nose to drop again. Then you gently roll out and you are back on speed again. It looks more impressive than it actually is.
And the guys that forgot the landing gear ? What the heck were they thinking ? What is that annoying sound we cannot identify ? In any case there is a way you quickly find out you forgot the landing gear. If all of a sudden it takes a lot more power to taxi, the marshaller became a lot taller all of a sudden and the landing roll is a lot shorter...............chances are that you forgot something. 😀
Based on the title of the video, I was expecting more than a 90 degree bank angle. Definitely nowhere near "upside down".
LOL lol. You're a genus
Can u explain why the almost inverted 777 did not stall? And does this mean it’s a very safe plane?
It's a wingover. But some idiot limey above is trying to call it by some idiot limey name (just like they tried to steal the "Khe Sahn approach and call it the Sarajevo Approach"
@@karenfisher1068 it was not even "almost inverted"
It stopped at roughly 90 deg banking
I’m not convinced that the 777 got anywhere near a 90° bank angle. To me (a professional videographer and commercial aviation enthusiast), it’s clear that the person filming tilted their phone/camera during the turn to make it look more impressive than it actually was.
I was there. It didn’t get near 90°. It’s indeed an optical illusion.
I too immediately knew there was camera trickery going on. the cameraman or editor conveniently removed all and every reference point.
Yeah, I thought the same thing, as the plane banked, the videographer simply turned his camera in the opposite angular direction, creating the illusion of a much steeper bank angle on the 777.
All good and all, but Denzel taught us all that a jetliner can indeed fly inverted 😂.
All jokes aside, I did watch a video years ago that did a feasibility analysis on whether or not it was possible and/or practical for such a large jetliner to go inverted in any scenario. Unfortunately, I can't for the life of me remember what the conclusion of that analysis was 😂.
@@Aquascape_Dreaming it has been done before: Boeing test pilot Tex Johnston barrel rolled a 707 over Lake Washington during the Seafair hydroplane races as a stunt back in 1955, of which there is video. He did it because there were airline executives in town for Seafair. He got called into Boeing President Bill Allen’s office and, when asked “what the hell he was doing” pulling a stunt like that, he replied “selling airplanes.” 😂
I would assume they have a landing gear failure and not that they intentionally belly landed it. I hope.
They forgot about it. Listen at 2:15 one of them ask about the landing gear in French ("pas sorti le train?") to what the second one says "No".
Hey, what's that alarm? I don't know, can't be too important.
Je French
I wonder what the alarm is for, I will still land, it must be nothing important.
@@mattafakkah It's getting really annoying now. Stop spamming.
@@futonclutch5040 this is what happens when you do drugs and make love to german tractor exhaust pipes, you get addicted to 6 year old trolling
The gear extender broke or malfunctioned, so they were not really ignoring the alarm. The narrator messed up or deliberately misspoke.
@@Three_Random_Words and this comes from what factual statement ?
Incident report for this aircraft says the same thing...... both the ASN and the French Gov report.
Nice try. That was a *Left Turn*
1:40 DO YOU HEAR THAT NOISE JIM? WHAT NOISE? like how do you not realize the gear isnt down??
1:35 Kind of surprised me to see an US registered tail number on the Avianca Aircraft. FAA says it belongs to a Trustee Bank in Salt Lake City, though. Maybe Avianca's credit card didn't go through.
Trustee's are the most popular way to register aircraft through corporations.
I did some work on a 707 once which was effectively a luxury business jet - at the time it was hired by some wealthy people from the Middle East. We weren't allowed to go aft of the forward door, but I can say the cockpit was in immaculate condition and we were required to put on overshoes before entering the aircraft. The crew said the aircraft was owned by a holding company in Miami.
Most of Avianca's Aircraft are leased, which entitles them to US Registration, or if they are owned by the airline, they are registered in the US mainly for tax purposes and equity handling by its owners.
Unless it was registered to a bankruptcy trustee (which would likely be in a chapter 11 reorg so the plane could stay in service); it more likely than not was simply the manner in which the plane was financed and registered under finance lien.
It's Microsoft Flight Simulator. Not a real video.
"after pilot forgets to lower landing gear"
The master alarm: 😱😱😱LOWER THE TINGG
Exactely, did was not "forget to put down the gear", but malinfunction in my opinion.
@@Twan2251 original video says otherwise
They should have cut the engine just before impact, that would help spare engine damage.
Well done Avianca crew!! 👏
No it doesn't. The word is spelt manoeuvre.
Does anyone have a camera that works?
The 777 maneuver is helpful if you ever get a stuck nose-up stabilizer or elevator to manage altitude, speed, and avoid stalling while planning actions. Usually, a 70-degree bank will get the job done as well.
Useful too if there is a couple in the lav he'in and she'in!
But but but that ain’t supposed to ever happen😰. One thing for sure it would wake up the passengers.
@@drizler It has happened in the past. It shouldn't happen but it has.
LOL, No.
If your blades snapped off from smacking the ground chances are you forgot something
I'm all for airshow shenanigans but that last clip was really unnecessarily unsafe - straddling the very edge of the paved runway like that, it would be very easy to send loose chunks of pavement or all kinds of FOD flying into the crowd at high speed. It would at least have been less irresponsible to do it centered on solid ground 🤷♂️
2:25 Even the plane looked happy in the end! 😊
Oh YEAH!! It DID have a smile, didn't it?!!😂
Heh, it is like the plane smile! :)
That landing was so smooth. .. . To a point. Check list next time.
Extraordinary manoeuvre of the 777 and an extraordinary
claim in the title that it flew upside down.
That gear up was not a "forgotten" by the pilot. It was a mechanical failure to extend. Hear all those noises?
Learn to "lower" your landing gear!!
As an aviation enthusiast, saying left hand engine is embarrassing.
Then what to say?
@@sailaab Number 1 engine.
Some airplanes have a big fat L on the left power lever and a big fat R on the right lever. And in their manuals there are no references to No 1 or No 2. Or port or starboard. Just left right.
I'm sorry, but how? Just how do you forget to lower your landing gear? It's on your check list for crying out loud and speaking of loud, that loud sound is the plane telling you...hey dummy, you fogot your landing gear. Man if I was Lurch from the Adams family I would have that face.
GUMPS X 3
2:10 For all who don’t believe they forgot the landing gear… Listen to them: „As-tu baissé le train?“ - „Non!“ that translates to „Did you lower the gear?“ - „No!“
They simply forgot it. Why? We all do not know either! Could be anything. But during my training, my FI always reminded me to go around in any case of uncertainty! And still those things happen 🤷🏽♂️
When the title of the video says that a Boeing 777 flies upside down, then there is no Boeing 777 flying upside down, I got dissapointed. Please be more accurate with your video description. Great video otherwise!
In the last clip, I wish there was a better view of the spectator's faces beaming with joy.
Hmmm..
Althoughnot everyone..
@@mattafakkah don't go violating jet tailpipes now, we all know how much you love exhaust pipes, quite literally.
1:45 Check that out for a steep approach!
He was so focused on his steep approach, he kinda forgot a minor checklist item.
It's not that steep, it's more that the runway is at a great angle, it's an altiport, in France we have some in the mountains, runways usually are at a 16% slope so it looks really steep even when you are on a flat approach. A special qualification is required, they may had this for a short period of time, so that's maybe the cause to them forgetting to lower the gear
What's the point of filming a giant aircraft doing maneuver ZOOMED IN!??? It shows NOTHING. A lot more impressive if you ZOOM OUT! 🤦🤦
What kinda props have them curled tips? That must be high performance yo.
Q tip props.
The Cheyenne III had them, though the bent part of the tips was a lot shorter 😂😂
@@FutureSystem738 lol
Neither flies it upside down as the title implements nor does it even nearly. Show the video with ground references und you can see that this was at maximum a 90 degree angle. Normally I like this 3 Minutes of Aviation but this one is a big thumbs down, sorry!
You will not see an Airbus airliner do the 777 maneuvers unless the pilot turns off the flight
control computers since it will not give the pilot permission to exceed 67 degrees of bank.
Nice video again, but I wish you'd dial back on the click-baity titles...
Not only titles, but thumbnails too
Did they really forget to lower the landing gear? That loud alarm surely would've reminded them of that. I would rather suspect a technical failure.
The plane landing on its belly was painful, such a beautiful aircraft to be damaged that way!
It still flies to this day, only minor damage, not major like stated here.
@@eMMjunaYschion that looked like a good amount of damage but my qualifications to set a value are pretty much zero, ha
Due to the camera tele-lens compression nobody can really say what the bank angle of that 777 was. That’s the trick of these videos. Lens compression makes everything look a lot more impressive !!
We can say with 100% certainty that this 777 was nowhere near flying upside down.
It did not do a complete roll like the 707 in Seattle did twice.
Bank angle, Bank angle! :-D
:-D :-D
does the "bank angle" warning go away, when you're inverted?
"no passengers were on board at the time"
I should f'ing well hope so too!
And also should be noted that 777 completely empty with minimum fuel is crazy overpowered! 😀
This channel is too underrated 🔥🔥 keep up the great work ✈️
Agree DJ...We Fans Are The Lucky Ones To Be Sure! Cheers
If a 707 could do a barrel roll during a flight demo, I would think a 777 could as well.
I guess aviation enthusiasts are not very good at geometry. I always find it funny how a 40° pitch becomes "vertical take-off", and how an 80° bank angle becomes "flying upside down". :) Don't take me wrong, I'm a pilot and aviation enthusiast myself.
Over-exaggeration is an important trait in the non-professional pursuit of many past times, including aviation.
There were passengers on board and they fear shat all over the cabin.
Who else yelled "BANK ANGLE" on the first one?
Meeeeeeeeeeeeeee 😊
I have a video of a plane almost hitting the tail of another plane, viralhog doesn’t want the video, where can I show this?
post it on your own channel, and report back here, but don't give the url because the post will get deleted. A link thru your name is good enough.
On that Avianca with the L engine out, it's ok to run the reverser on the only good engine when landing? Wouldn't you get a a pretty solid yaw?
Yeah you probably would get some yaw but a pilot will use every tool at his disposal to stop the plane. Especially if you divert and are above your landing weight.
One engine TRev is a piece of cake. Though open, it’s doubtful they added much thrust. Reverse is used commensurate with centerline control. Too much yaw? Modulate Rev.
Yeah, it's sometimes hard to hear that blaring gear alarm.🙄
They should do a Tex Johnson and get a photo of it inverted.
Boeing flies upside down ≠ Boeing almost goes inverted
The 777 cant flight upside down, because of the aerofoil profil
This isn’t inverted, no where near it! It’s a very sharp banking maneuver.
The 777 move is a routine procedure for military operations.
The 777... "S*ck it, Airbus" 😅😅😅
How did Aerosucre get their hands on a 777??
Upside-down isn't the same as a 92° bank
I like how they always show the thumbnail vid in the beginning so people pay attention to the other vids instead of just thinking about the thumbnail. Props to you man, props to you.
Get it props like propellers 😂
The T7 does a 60° bank turn
RUclips: *OMG ALMOST INVERTED, FIGHTER PILOTS BARREL ROLLED IT OMGGG*
That 777 didn't go up side down unless your watching it in Australia. Fake.
I’m watching in Australia, still didn’t go upside down 😂😂😂
@@FutureSystem738 I am watching it in Australia too, and it didn't go upside down.
“Inverted” 😂
Your videos just get better and better. Keep it up!
@@mattafakkah it a test flight lol
@@weewg2 you are new here, that statement is all that matta is capable of trolling with.
for almost a year now, that is all he posts, ive proven him wrong 4 times now also :)
@@CapStar362 xd
@@mattafakkah yeah it is, nasty as fuck also
Gear warning horn : am I a joke to you?
Hey, whats that noise? Oh, it's the gear warning horn.
2:02 R Y A N A I R
They got mcas on the roll axis now aswell?
Not the same without that mainstay of Aerosucre!
but it is actually not a good feature the fact that boeings allow it to be done. Airbusses don't, they limit the angle, no matter how much you try. And this has obvious safety reasons, besides, it will never be recquired, hence, hydraulic systems rely on gravity to work. So to turn an airplane like this can damage fuel and hydraulic management.
A less than 90 degree turn
True
Or less than 90° bank even ...
1:40 I too would forget the landing gear if that high-pitched sound were playing!
TY,,,,,,WOW 1st class incredible very interesting super kool ,1st class great info.,, AAAAAAAAAAA++++++++++++ again great video I liked it a lot ,keep up the great work
Must be a slow week in aviation
The Boeing 777 maneuver was really cool! 😎
Except, it was fake. It was a camera angle trick.
They should make an alarm to warn you that your landing gear isn't down.
There is
@@MatyasArby Its called scraping metal. 😂
Regarding the second clip; the Avianca Boeing 787 with an engine failure, you really need to keep the references to 'Engine No. 1’ and 'Engine No. 2' (including 'Engines No. 3 & No. 4' for quad-jets). “Left hand engine” tells us nothing. Who’s left? I would have thought that with you guys being an aviation channel, this wouldn’t need to be said.
What is the model name of plane @ 2.26
I think it was the 'Trinidad GT' made by the (now defunct) French group called Société de Construction d'Avions de Tourisme et d'Affaires
Or shortened to SOCATA.
(Later names were DAHER-SOCATA, EADS Socata).
@@sailaab Thanks a lot.
arey🙂 bhai! Welcome🙂
.
I also went to the original video, to check
Boeing:the 777x can takeoff vertically,bank 90 degrees and even go upside down!!!
spirit:hmm,turbulence a good way for making people pay the fees...
That was in the good old days when Boeing could actually build planes.
The 777 was their best.
Boeing in 2024: "Oops....the doors are falling off the plane."
"777 flies upside down" - shows video of 90 degree bank - that is not upside down!
--------
787 - only one heat blur trail behind right engine, saw that before i saw the reverser opening.
--------
How the hell do you forget your landing gear with that blaring alarm in your ears? Original video states they had hundreds of hours flying..... not buying that.
--------
Always fun getting a 200MPH jet blast in your face right?!?!?
Ooops - matta & now Three Random Words - sorry - and i'll keep on doing this, you just get my comment posted right back to the top of the page each time.
Great videos as always. Even cooler that I know the owner of that Albatros!!
The "almost upside down" maneuver was neither "upside down", nor "almost". It was merely just about overhead, giving that impression when doing a high-bank turn.
the first one looks like it should be in one of those "its unfortunate that we could'nt fly yesterday, but of course safetey is a priority at boeing" then it shows a bunch of mistakes etc. that Boeing was yeah anyway like Alaska 1282, lion air 610, 777 vertical takeoff etc.
The 777 did nothing more exotic than a simple wingover: in this case a climbing turn to bleed off airspeed to gear speed and configure to land. Nothing exotic about that. The pilot in the L-39 has his right mainmount in the dirt off the taxiway. Not very impressive: more money than piloting (or taxiing) skills
"upside down", you get an upside down thumbs up!
Title to vid: AIRPLANE FLIES UPSIDE DOWN!!!!!!! actual: nope, ALMOST tho, frak u 3 mins of LIES
I could’ve sworn the title of this video was “Boeing 777 flies upside down”. Watch it 3 times. Never saw it. Am I the only one who didn’t see it??🤷♂️
So... Didn't fly inverted.
Why not just title. 777 almost flies inverted? Still grabs ya and isn't a lie. I'm really sick of this channel doing this stuff. May switch to the other dude.
Boeing airplanes used to be high quality when they had the machinists building the majority of the plane. Now Boeing is outsourcing 60% of the airplane to low cost low quality suppliers.
The Trip 7 would've been so much better with some visual ques to reference just how extreme that angle was!
You can also see the "Belly landing" was due to having just nose gear green (down) and 2 non illuminated lights on the panel... The tri-gear wheels only the nose gear deployed
1:10 had me looking for a text for a whole half a minute 😅
If you check the original video for the gear-up landing and put subtitles on, the passenger and pilot get out and you can hear them discussing it, coming out of the aircraft swearing and saying "we were so busy monitoring the plane ahead I didn't even notice". It was *not* done on purpose.
the 777 only did a 90 degree angle. thats not allmost invert. fyi!!!!!!
The B777 did not fly " upside down " or inverted to use the correct term, it`s a very steep bank, just over 90 degrees, but no where near inverted which would be 180 degrees. Half truth from the uploader.