Interpretation of regression coefficients: Log-Log, Log-Linear and Linear-Log Model

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 окт 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @trapattoni_
    @trapattoni_ 2 года назад +2

    Very good explanation, I finally got to understand this. Thanks!

  • @Sandra-rc5uc
    @Sandra-rc5uc Год назад +2

    Thank you! This video was very understandable. I especially liked the practical examples towards the end so I could see if I would calculate it right with you.

    • @RohanB
      @RohanB  Год назад

      I will try to find the particular file and share it with you

  • @IAP_mkt
    @IAP_mkt 6 месяцев назад +2

    there is a mistake at around the 3.58 minute of the video. For log lin, a 1 UNIT (not percent) change in X brings betahat * 100 percent change in Y. The practical example interpretation you gave later in the video however is correct.
    Also there is a mistake in lin log. A 1 percent change in x brings a betahat/100 UNIT (not percent) change in Y. Again, at the beginning of video it there is the mistake, but at the end of the video your interpretation is right.

  • @patradokun8117
    @patradokun8117 9 месяцев назад +1

    very clear explanation. it helped a lot, thank you

  • @riase
    @riase 2 года назад +2

    How do I do a log linear model (LOGIT)? I cannot find any information about it on youtube.

    • @RohanB
      @RohanB  2 года назад

      To my knowledge, It cannot be done. In logit, the dependent variable is binary, 1 or 0. It is not possible to take the log of '0'. Hence, the log-linear model in Logit may not be viable. Sorry for the late reply.

  • @radostinastamenova9249
    @radostinastamenova9249 Год назад +2

    Many thanks for the great explanation! I have a question. How to intrepretate coefficients in log-log and log-linear models when both variables are transformed in first differences?

    • @RohanB
      @RohanB  Год назад +1

      No difference in interpretation.

  • @george_simakou
    @george_simakou Год назад +2

    The Linear-Log model is wrong because the change in Y is always in units and not percent. This means that a 1 percent change in X brings a change in Y by β/100 units of measurement and NOT percent.

  • @aydenchassaniol1378
    @aydenchassaniol1378 2 года назад +2

    hey is there any chance you can help get a better undertstanding of these types of problems

  • @bryank5502
    @bryank5502 2 года назад +2

    thx for the video sir, but in our class we have b0 + b1x. So alpha in your video is b0?

    • @RohanB
      @RohanB  2 года назад

      b0 is intercept which is generally denoted by aplha in classroom. But there is no hard and fast rule.