Video 8: Logistic Regression - Interpretation of Coefficients and Forecasting

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 9 сен 2024

Комментарии • 81

  • @goguzaum
    @goguzaum 8 лет назад +42

    This is the best video explanation I've ever seen on this topic! Thank you sir!

  • @annang5418
    @annang5418 Год назад +3

    so helpful, learned more in one video than one entire semester of 6 credit stats class.

  • @user-mn5bs2dz8d
    @user-mn5bs2dz8d 10 месяцев назад

    This is exactly what I was looking for since hours! This is the best video I found after a lot of hunting for simple intuition behind logistic regression.

  • @mhb11
    @mhb11 7 лет назад +20

    15:44 "woman turned on" Didn't expect a video on logistic regression to contain those very words, spoken matter-of-factly

  • @ndahchefor3715
    @ndahchefor3715 6 лет назад +2

    Best Tutor I have ever met on youtube

  • @michaelhood1941
    @michaelhood1941 8 лет назад +3

    Thanks, I needed a quick refresher on how to interpret LogReg coefficients. This is just what I was looking for. Well done!

  • @AlexSmith-tr9hc
    @AlexSmith-tr9hc 7 лет назад +1

    Both videos 7 and 8 were excellent. I wish you had more like this that would help us understand from soup-to-nuts how the coefficients are built internally using real data in a simple-to-understand video that shows us how the betas are calculated.

  • @elenagudziunaite3914
    @elenagudziunaite3914 8 лет назад +8

    This is amazing!! thank you so much, it's great help when writing a dissertation!! Saved me!!

  • @druidier
    @druidier 6 лет назад

    Jesus H. Christ, i can understand, such good teaching technique, clean, crispy, useful, easy to understand

  • @pyramidheadrocks
    @pyramidheadrocks 7 лет назад +2

    THANK YOU SO MUCH! This is the clearest explanation out there.

  • @shonendumm
    @shonendumm Год назад

    Watching this in 2023, best I've seen yes

  • @UndeadEarth1
    @UndeadEarth1 4 года назад

    Thank you so much, this is the best example driven teaching of this subject ever. I tried to understand this from books and multiple other videos, but didn't really get it it until I watched this video.

  • @zaraazami4936
    @zaraazami4936 8 лет назад

    Thats what i was looking for! More clearly explained than in the Wooldridge book! Thanks a lot!

  • @rajeshtukdeo
    @rajeshtukdeo 4 года назад

    Thank you for a fantastic video on Logistic Regression !!

  • @redbeans6599
    @redbeans6599 8 лет назад +2

    Great explanation of logistic regression. The video 7&8 make it much easier for me to understand. Thank you!

  • @him4u324
    @him4u324 9 лет назад +2

    Thanks a lot for this amazing video. it explained really the concept of Logistic. THUMBS UP!!!

  • @rgni0001
    @rgni0001 6 лет назад

    wonderful, very clear and straightforward

  • @anuraratnasiri5516
    @anuraratnasiri5516 8 лет назад

    Lovely presentation! You are a wonderful teacher. Thank you so much for doing this for others who need help in Statistics!

  • @pradeepvenkatesan5806
    @pradeepvenkatesan5806 7 лет назад +1

    Absolutely amazing. Thank you so much !

  • @PaulHGSIMON
    @PaulHGSIMON 9 лет назад +1

    MUCH clearer. Thank you

  • @pruksapanbantawtook5671
    @pruksapanbantawtook5671 4 года назад

    This is a clear explanation. Thank you!

  • @payammahbobi8029
    @payammahbobi8029 6 лет назад +2

    Excellent Teaching. Thank you sir.

  • @rahulmudaliar705
    @rahulmudaliar705 6 лет назад

    nicely explained, easy to understand in-depth explanation

  • @manglem10
    @manglem10 4 года назад

    You are a great teacher

  • @janegitahi
    @janegitahi 5 лет назад

    Your explanations are a Life Saver!! Thank you very much and keep up this excellent job!! :-)

  • @zhyanrafat2710
    @zhyanrafat2710 3 года назад

    thank you very much for your explain

  • @MartinaHertl
    @MartinaHertl 6 лет назад

    Great and very helping video! Thank you!

  • @abdulrahmanalshammari7256
    @abdulrahmanalshammari7256 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much. Very useful and awesome explanation!

  • @sedeshtra
    @sedeshtra 8 лет назад

    Really helped me for my midterm. Thanks a lot!

  • @mj89z
    @mj89z 8 лет назад

    best explanation out there, thank you kindly

  • @abdullahalmuhsi1500
    @abdullahalmuhsi1500 7 лет назад

    Find the logistic function f with the given properties.
    f(0) = 1, f has limiting value 16, and for small values of x, f is approximately exponential and grows by 75% with every increase of 1 in x.

  • @ashrafal-warraquiy6614
    @ashrafal-warraquiy6614 5 лет назад

    Excellent Video. If you can create another one on how to estimate the coefficients and more examples on multiple logistic regression.

  • @ayahosny8236
    @ayahosny8236 7 лет назад

    This is the best video explanation ..Thank you sir

  • @safwathassan381
    @safwathassan381 6 лет назад

    Thanks a lot really very useful, very simple explaination and very insightful :)

  • @jetiyap.5725
    @jetiyap.5725 9 лет назад

    Thanks so much, the video helping me to get more understand for the way the model comes from. Waiting, if you will produce more useful video. ^^

  • @anilpillai9180
    @anilpillai9180 4 года назад

    Awesome interpretation

  • @zhiguowang1596
    @zhiguowang1596 3 года назад

    Like using R for example, you can use lm() to mimic glm() logit.

  • @ottostipsicz75
    @ottostipsicz75 6 лет назад

    Great! Thank you very much!

  • @frikhatomar6426
    @frikhatomar6426 4 года назад

    Wonderful ... Thanks a lot Sir!

  • @ecacarva
    @ecacarva 7 лет назад

    Dear Professor
    I am a statistics student, search all Internet for a good explanation and found yours, that is the best video explanation I've ever see.
    So I have one doubt, in linear regression model we can evaluate the whole mode looking for a significant p-value, lower error and higher R2.
    How we can do it on Logistic Regression? I normally use R and see it produces only information below:
    Null deviance: 29.648 on 24 degrees of freedom
    Residual deviance: 25.198 on 22 degrees of freedom
    AIC: 31.198
    How I can use them to evaluate if the whole model is good or not ?
    Thank you and congrats again for excellent explanation.

  • @veela_girl
    @veela_girl 7 лет назад

    Very helpful, thank you!

  • @hemphillmc
    @hemphillmc 5 лет назад

    Great video! Even though it's in Excel, it helped me create a good solution in python to solve a related problem!

  • @marcello-6351
    @marcello-6351 7 лет назад +1

    Question: Is it correct to say that the predictive power of Age is greater than Woman (just by looking at the absolute value of the coefficient)? If I were to remove 1 variable for any reasons, should I always remove Woman (assuming that the model is correct and the learned coefficients are optimal)?

  • @shervinjannesar7908
    @shervinjannesar7908 5 лет назад

    Amazing! Thanks a lot

  • @moltobhai
    @moltobhai 9 лет назад

    Helped alot! I suck at statistics and this video made everything clear. Have a mid term tomorrow.... :/

    • @avijitroy9926
      @avijitroy9926 9 лет назад

      +Asif Irtiza Hussain mid valo hoisilo to vai? :v

    • @moltobhai
      @moltobhai 9 лет назад

      +Avijit Roy haha... Tmio ek jagay eshe thekla? Bujchi... Report korteso

  • @ericguerracivit
    @ericguerracivit 7 лет назад +1

    awesome!

  • @being5033
    @being5033 5 лет назад

    Fantastic.. thanks alot

  • @Hariharan0606
    @Hariharan0606 7 лет назад

    awesome explanation :)

  • @ankushjamthikar9780
    @ankushjamthikar9780 6 лет назад +2

    How do you estimate the coefficients for logistic regression?

  • @pascaltorvic6246
    @pascaltorvic6246 6 лет назад

    Great Clip...

  • @shahmirmowahed9117
    @shahmirmowahed9117 6 лет назад

    thanks, sir.

  • @abdulazeemsufi4690
    @abdulazeemsufi4690 6 лет назад

    Thank you sir...

  • @sylwiaperdek5047
    @sylwiaperdek5047 8 лет назад

    Assuming that for example the coefficient " constant" is not significant..or any other coefficient...
    Would you then simply exclude it from the calculation of the probability or still included in the probability in your calculations?

  • @jundou7858
    @jundou7858 6 лет назад

    Thank you very much for the videos you uploaded, well explained, one thing I am wondering is here we have two independent variables, age and sex, what its graph will look like comparing to the model with one independent variable age.

  • @vishnusudanagunta1029
    @vishnusudanagunta1029 9 лет назад +1

    Really helped alot sir..please share more videos

  • @tarshasleak
    @tarshasleak 8 лет назад

    what if the ages are given in classes...like 15-24,25-34,35-44,...and you are asked to find the odds of a 25-34yr old living in a village, from your video i understand that i will multiply the other coefficients by one but what will the coefficient for the interested age class be multiplied with as the age is in a range and not a point estimate as you used in your example? should i subtract 25 from 34 and use the resultant difference to multiply its coefficient???

  • @northstar12389
    @northstar12389 8 лет назад

    But if I just wanna the null hypothesis that considers only the intercept. No feature. What should I do ?

  • @kathleenjoydeguzman7004
    @kathleenjoydeguzman7004 7 лет назад

    hi! may i ask, can the coefficient for woman in the multiple regression u have shown which is -0.557795 can be interpreted as "the likelihood that a woman subscribes in a magazine holding age constant is 55.78% less than a man"?

  • @angelLemon12349
    @angelLemon12349 4 года назад

    5 stars!!!!!

  • @chiaracolucci9024
    @chiaracolucci9024 7 лет назад

    Great video! However, would be nice to explain also the intercept. Why is it negative? I know that the more negative the intercept is, the more the logistic curve is shifted to the right, therefore implying few y=1 observations..

  • @akashprabhakar6353
    @akashprabhakar6353 4 года назад

    What does that negative sign for woman coefficient meant....you told that women are less likely to subscribe to the magazine as sign was negative but their probability was increased from 35 yo to 36 yo...Kindly clear my doubt

  • @DachuanHuang
    @DachuanHuang 7 лет назад

    What does training dataset contain? I mean, for \bf{x} I know, what is the training dataset's label? I mean, \bf{Y}? Because I want to know how do you get the linear model: y^* = \beta^T * \bf{x}. For the process from y^* to p I understand.

  • @sanmansabane2899
    @sanmansabane2899 7 лет назад

    Do we really need to go for Logistic Regression for problems like character recognition ?

  • @yolanda3060
    @yolanda3060 Год назад

    How can I find the name of this professor? I would like more content from him

  • @the4thdimensionisnow965
    @the4thdimensionisnow965 6 лет назад

    is the reference category 1(=subscribe) or 0(=not) in this example?

  • @NS-o9x
    @NS-o9x 6 лет назад

    Can you please explain Probit Regression model too?

  • @donfeto7636
    @donfeto7636 5 лет назад

    how i get those at the beginning coefficients

  • @rithikrithiki
    @rithikrithiki 8 лет назад

    I have a doubt. How did u lock in the values. to get ($C$3:$C$4)

    • @xl88888
      @xl88888 8 лет назад +1

      +rithik marshall simply press F4 on your keyboard when selecting the range

  • @owenzaynesdad7920
    @owenzaynesdad7920 7 лет назад +1

    Why are we multiplying the constant by 1?

    • @zoukevin8459
      @zoukevin8459 6 лет назад

      That's because the assumed model is alpha*1+beta*var_1. alpha*1 is the constant term.

  • @Hari-cz3od
    @Hari-cz3od 6 лет назад

    Amazing! May I know the name of the instructor and if he publishes any book/his own channel?

  • @ranajitmajumdar7836
    @ranajitmajumdar7836 2 года назад

    Plz give the link of data..

  • @fernandojackson7207
    @fernandojackson7207 7 лет назад

    Do you really mean probability when you say you want to estimate the likelihood that a 35yo woman will buy the magazine?

  • @kushagraagrawal6382
    @kushagraagrawal6382 8 лет назад

    How to get the values of alpha and beta plzzz anyone help me

  • @janegitahi
    @janegitahi 5 лет назад

    I had started to think something was wrong with me...

  • @yahyashaikhworld
    @yahyashaikhworld 7 лет назад

    wow

  • @arbenkqiku8880
    @arbenkqiku8880 6 лет назад

    I feel offended. Can you do one with 72 genders? Ahah I am joking. Thanks a lot for the video :)