I really appreciate the "more advanced angle" that you represent your Studio One tutorials. It is really refreshing and different than other S1 tutorials. Really shows the depth Studio One has under the hood. Thanks for all your work! Looking forward to S1 7.
I watched 6-7 different Version 7 reviews yesterday and (for me) this is the best. Not as many featured items, but each done so well that it actually provides value. As mentioned below, Tempo Detection Nobody out there showcased the idea of basing the detection on multiple tracks (in a sub-mix), and I can imagine this would be more meaningful to the overall result. Many fewer steps, although your detailed Tempo Detection videos provide other techniques that are still very valuable. NEW + OLD could be powerful. Global Transpose - with its consideration for tracks that should not be transposed (MIDI), could be very useful as presented. Stem Separation - Not bad and very convenient. I’m a fan of RipX, but this is very handy. Splice Integration - Not something I need or am likely to use. Love your presentation style.
Just want to point out that when Marcus says "1 step" in the Transpose feature, he actually means 1/2 step. (Don't mean to nitpick, but it could be confusing for some people.)
After working for 8 hours with the new Studio One Pro 7, (compared with the Studio One 6.4), i can say that by far the BIGGEST improvement, is the ergonomics and visibility ! HUGE difference, to help you see the various "events", and manipulate and arrange them much more easily. Even in the smallest view ( all view window) you can see and move events 500% more easily. So arrangement and composition is much more easy. Also , for those that they have and use splice , its much easier to incorporate a sample in your song. I have tried the rest of the features (global transport , launcher , impact edit view, tempo detection & stem separation) and i can say that although they are very useful , someone will use them from time to time and not always. From the above i found more useful the Impact edit view, which lets you put the kicks, snares, much more easily.
Marcus, great coverage of the Advance Tempo Detection! This to me is worth the price of admission as it can save a lot of time when recording musicians without a tick track then enabling all the grid-based features of Studio One. There are a few things that it cannot handle yet, but I am sure it will improve over time.
I was watching your old video on tempo detection just yesterday was hoping you would talk about this feature in the new release. I'm trying to tempo match an acoustic guitar played very loose to program drums. Actually so helpful thank you!
i came here on recommendation from a Rich Cresswell saying to check out this video of yours in Johnny Lipsham's studio one 7 overview livestream...this is brilliant..clear ad to the point...enjoyed your enthusiasm great job Marcus..and my name is Mark also! :)
Great video Marcus. Now I can easily do my new kareokes here in the Philippines:). The tempo detection is killer too. I too have my older CD projects and a most, although, having good stems, lost the notation on exact tempos. Thanks for the help.
I don't think Stem separation works that well as an integrated product, because there will always be a 3rd party solution that is better. Apple is trying hard to re-brand itself as an AI company, so it makes sense for them. Steinberg has one of the better stem separation solutions, in their Spectralayers suite, but that is also sold as 3rd party, and the pro version is not included in cubase. One thing that makes spectralayers so powerful, is that it also uses the AI/Machine learning for other uses, like de-reverb, something that is actually a tool for professionals, so it isn't just a stem separation tool. But for any video talking about Stem separation, without any useful additional features, I think it is always best to be honest. The use cases for stem separation is to be able to use beats, or vocals, in a project at the sketch stage, when you don't know if you will end up ever publishing, so you actually at that point don't need to license the content (or get access to the original multis/stems). And with a built in stem separation, you can be sure that the reason to use stem separation with S1, is never to re-master a song where there are no multi-tracks available. For fun, you can use stem separation to create karaoke tracks, with S1, you even have the ability to show the lyrics and chords on a simplified screen. Or you can use it to practice along with the original track. But those are not pro-uses, so not suitable for marketing.
Absolutely. I feel the same. No final use case for this feature. I use it (3rd party) for ripping guide vocals from client's example songs where I don't want their demo music, guitar or piano, merely so that I can have a soft vocal guide while producing a song's music. That's it! Everyone gets all excited about this feature. Why? Almost the same as the whole Dolby Atmos thing when 99% of people listen on headphones. All these features do sell DAWs though. I also find it useless to use a clip launcher for the type of music I produce. Anyway, the executives at Presonus will be smiling all the way to the bank.
@@ettiennelane9173 If Dolby atmos was a solution for making headphone mixes translate to speakers, or vice verse, I would see Atmos as meaningful. But it isn't. Atmos for headphones is an afterthought. But I am a fan of surround sound, so I'm glad they support it, but it should be quite niche. I have a different take on clip launches, I find them useful for sketching, and not just for loop based music, and I have heard the same from many others. So I do see a point of having that system. Combined with the chord track, and global transpose, and you have a pretty good system for producing sketches, and adopting them to singers. If you only have limited time with a vocalist, it is great to be able to get as quickly as possible to the takes you need. When it comes to stem separation, I have absolutely no faith that presonus will keep developing it, and improving on it, to catch up with the best. I strongly believe that they will just fall further and further behind the best. I am more confident in Steinberg, as it is a 3rd party solution and it already does more than just stem separation. I'm not convinced Apple will ever be class leading, but they might tweak it, to make most use of their NPUs in their CPUs, so as a technical demonstration, they will at least have some motivation to keep improving, and they will probably evolve it in to a more complete audio tool suite, in order for them to show off what their AI engine can do. For a very specific, and not personal reason, I am looking for a stem separation solution, and there is an argument that getting a DAW with it build in, at the price of Studio one, and possibly with a discount, because of possible hardware purchases from Presonus. For that specific use case, the result of the stem separation does not need to be perfect, but I still don't feel comfortable with suggesting S1 as a solution, because it does not seem to deliver the same level of quality that one can get from other solutions and I do feel my endorsement of a product should reflect some level of quality of the result, even if this level might be fine for that specific use case.
For me, one use of stem separation would be for referencing mixes. For example when I get asked to make the drums sound like (at least the style or overall eq) the drums from another song.
Great video as always, much appreciated! But I couldn't be more underwhelmed by the features shown, is this really the best of it? Global transpose (couldn't this just be a macro if you needed it?), an integrated loop shop browser, and what is almost certainly the Demucs stem separation algorithm that has been free to use for years already. Increasingly I'm finding I only open Studio One for tempo mapping, which Bitwig is still catching up with. Maybe if the upgrade is discounted at some point I might move from v5, but this isn't looking like there's much future left in the software side of the company after the Fender acquisition.
At 19:35, it looked like you magically inserted the Pro EQ plug-in on the recently imported track - without a mouse click or anything. How did you do this??? (sorry if this is a widely-known shortcut that I've missed). Thanks - Cliff
Nice demonstration! Unfortunately, the white highlights are now too bright and starts to hurt the eyes after a few hours. There seems to be no way of reducing the harsh brightness any more.
What's the best way to move to a next version of Studio One? I ask myself this question with every upgrade, but now I'd appreciate proper expert advice.
quick question, after selecting and downloading the desired sample from splice WHERE is the sample downloaded to? is it simply copied neatly into that song's project folder or is it downloaded somewhere else on your hard drive from which studio one references it? thanks!!
Stem Separation is a game changer, but way to many artifacts. As a engineer what kinda processing do you believe can eliminate that, when a noise gate cant?
It would be nice if S1 could automatically name audio files when Chord track or Global transpose has been used, and commited, so we can see how it has been changed. If you can, you should always re-record the audio, but it can help a lot to commit and then not have to think about re-recording for a while.
This is a very good update and it’s really pretty, but unfortunately it’s been extremely buggy for me. Crashed a powerful Mac a couple of times froze up once wiped out all of my templates and shortcut settings macros so beware if you upgrade back up all of that stuff first Luckily I had another rig. But even the rounded edges and the performance on the editing screen feels more solid. I’m sure the bugs will get worked out as they get reported, but this is a good one.
Hi Marcus, sorry if my comment hasn’t relate to the video. I am still at studio one 5.5ish, have no need upgrade to 6. Now i have a song and has tempo track enabled when tracking. After all have been done, i export mixdown that song and the click still audible in this mixdown although i have disable the tempo track by un-tick the tempo track and off all the metronome before export mixdown. If you have a solution please guide me through, thank you.
Once you download the Splice sound, is it there after you no longer have your Splice account active?
Месяц назад
Yes, I just checked. Haven't been on Spice in ages. No active account. Was able to download one of the samples I purchased like 3 years ago.
Месяц назад
Also, while my sub was active I snagged all the songs and stuck em on an hdd. Still got em.
Месяц назад
Ummmm.....so im posting another reply. i was able to do it using the website earlier (download my sample) but I was NOT able to do it using the Splice desktop app for Windows. I have no idea what is up with that. The app lets me see my sounds but there is an error when I try to download them. honestly, i would just avoid Splice at this point. The feature in SO7 is neato and tempting but Splice kinda sucks.
Hi marcus I have a really wierd experience with studio one .. espicially in mastering . It didnt sound so good … from your stand studio one is as good sounding / summing / processingn / mixdown as logic / protools ? In other words … do you trust it for pro mixing / mastering ?
I’ve never used the tempo map. I’m not entirely sure what the goal even is here. Is the idea to simply get everything to follow that tempo map? 🤷🏻♂️ Someone help me out here please.
Not sure stem separation integration is a good idea, since this is a technology that's evolving rapidly. So there's a high probability it will become also-ran within months.
The question is will in version 7 playback icon on 14 inch mac book screen take up 1/4 of screen real estate? ( studio one not scaling)? If yes it’s shame..
In fact, what is awesome is that it independently scales for as many screens as you have. I've got the 16-in MacBook Pro, a 65-in OLED and a 38-in curved 5K main monitor... I can scale each and every one of them independently And the screens totally adjust perfectly! If I need bigger fonts on one particular screen it rescales perfectly. I could never do this on my Windows machines... It totally sucked. So again, what the f are you talking about?
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE USER OF STUDIO ONE PRO? PLUS WHO ARE STILL IN RUNNING THEIR SUBSCRIPTION. I am already a studio one pro.Plus user. I still have few more months to go. HAVE NO CLARITY ON THIS
☹Presonus keeps forgetting how music works. Transients-to-tempo is not auto-tempo. Logic takes free-rec piano (no kick required) and Q's into clean notation (easier to edit notation, for that matter, as S1 forget Notion's auto-rests). Logic and StaffPad are just more musical to me, plus free updates. Not sour... just thinking this is sold as better than it really is. No?
@@dfhm-pq2cf Upgrade Offers: Users who purchased Studio One 6 after August 1st, 2024, will get a free upgrade to version 7 with a year of updates. Studio One Pro Plus: Renamed from Studio One Plus, this subscription plan is available at $179 per year, offering cloud tools, content, and perpetual license discounts
Hi, I don’t know if anyone is willing to give out a copy of studio one license for free as I am in great need of one and can’t afford it at the moment, I don’t want to use cracked softwares anymore as I don’t get to enjoy the full benefits of original software. Anyone please?????
Too me this isn't a great update. Seems to me they are going after the low end users the "Beat maker"... The " Loop Kids" but yet they still won't do anything for the professional film composer. There is still no way to line up a marker and time code. Yes you can change the time signature but why put in all the other tools and not that. But lets spend our time on flashy easy to use loop BS.. Disappointing.
I kinda feel the same. They're calling it "pro" but added features that i've never seen a "pro-user" use. I get that they're trying to extend their user-range. But they left out professional users with this update. This feels more like a 6.x update to me, rather than a "7".
And i do see something that looks a bit similar to Logic Pro in the new Studio One 7. The edit page all the tracks does look almost the same with Logic Pro tho. Why? Why can't they design something different from other daw? I do like Studio One because it's snappy but it feels like I'm using a copycat version of Logic Pro when it comes to Studio One 7 tho.
So it sounds like, to me, if we are a studio or producer that works exclusively with real live musicians, there is absolutely nothing here that will apply to us and therefore, don't bother to upgrade.
Waste of money for what you get. I suppose no one is forcing me to uograde. I can do that at anytime. So let’s see when some serious updates happen . Not this trivial nonsense .
Man…all this absolute garbage makes me want to switch to Reaper permanently. There’s just some things that Studio One does that I like so much I can’t quit them. Might happen soon though
After 5 minutes not showing the tempo detection just talking about it an showing already 3 to 5 steps for preparation, I knew I can shut down cause this is useless. check Logic Pro for such tasks. which one click I've got what you try to explain in endless time. Sorry...
With the global transposition can it be inserted mid way through a track so that you can insert a key change rather than have it affect the entire length of the song
![Twenty One Pilots - “The Line” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/E2Rj2gQAyPA/mqdefault.jpg)
I really appreciate the "more advanced angle" that you represent your Studio One tutorials. It is really refreshing and different than other S1 tutorials. Really shows the depth Studio One has under the hood. Thanks for all your work! Looking forward to S1 7.
I watched 6-7 different Version 7 reviews yesterday and (for me) this is the best. Not as many featured items, but each done so well that it actually provides value.
As mentioned below, Tempo Detection
Nobody out there showcased the idea of basing the detection on multiple tracks (in a sub-mix), and I can imagine this would be more meaningful to the overall result. Many fewer steps, although your detailed Tempo Detection videos provide other techniques that are still very valuable. NEW + OLD could be powerful.
Global Transpose - with its consideration for tracks that should not be transposed (MIDI), could be very useful as presented.
Stem Separation - Not bad and very convenient. I’m a fan of RipX, but this is very handy.
Splice Integration - Not something I need or am likely to use.
Love your presentation style.
Just want to point out that when Marcus says "1 step" in the Transpose feature, he actually means 1/2 step. (Don't mean to nitpick, but it could be confusing for some people.)
Thanks, Marcus! You are our anchor!
You are an excellent online educator, Marcus and have the perfect balance of pragmatism, delivery tempo and presentation. Top work, and thank you! ;o)
Great video Marcus! These are very welcome new features and you do such a fine job in breaking them down in an understandable manner. Thank you!
That's a really nice theme for S1 GUI! 😍
Thanks as always Marcus.
After working for 8 hours with the new Studio One Pro 7, (compared with the Studio One 6.4), i can say that by far the BIGGEST improvement, is the ergonomics and visibility ! HUGE difference, to help you see the various "events", and manipulate and arrange them much more easily. Even in the smallest view ( all view window) you can see and move events 500% more easily. So arrangement and composition is much more easy. Also , for those that they have and use splice , its much easier to incorporate a sample in your song. I have tried the rest of the features (global transport , launcher , impact edit view, tempo detection & stem separation) and i can say that although they are very useful , someone will use them from time to time and not always. From the above i found more useful the Impact edit view, which lets you put the kicks, snares, much more easily.
but this old "Win XP - Cubase Style" round borders are ugly, and the "automatic" color for selection is often too bright
Marcus, great coverage of the Advance Tempo Detection! This to me is worth the price of admission as it can save a lot of time when recording musicians without a tick track then enabling all the grid-based features of Studio One. There are a few things that it cannot handle yet, but I am sure it will improve over time.
great video
Marcus, You are a Pro!! Great level of detail and so helpful with actual real world use!!
Thank you very much Marccus for sharing your knowledge, it is very helpful for people like us who are just starting out in this field.
You always have the deep end awesome features of S1. Thank you!!!
I was watching your old video on tempo detection just yesterday was hoping you would talk about this feature in the new release. I'm trying to tempo match an acoustic guitar played very loose to program drums. Actually so helpful thank you!
i came here on recommendation from a Rich Cresswell saying to check out this video of yours in Johnny Lipsham's studio one 7 overview livestream...this is brilliant..clear ad to the point...enjoyed your enthusiasm great job Marcus..and my name is Mark also! :)
Great video Marcus. Now I can easily do my new kareokes here in the Philippines:). The tempo detection is killer too. I too have my older CD projects and a most, although, having good stems, lost the notation on exact tempos. Thanks for the help.
So helpful and informative, thank you so much.
Great job, Marcus! Very informative!
As always a high quality video from you. Thank you very much 😊
Loved the video, thanks for the detailed explanation!! Saludos desde Chile
Thanks Lucas, great vid
Enjoyed this.
Wow. Im impressed. Im still on version 5.5 ... i think its definitely time for an upgrade.
Excellent overview Marcus: thanks!
Great video Marcus! I'm looking forward to getting in to this today :)
Awesome video and demo.
I don't think Stem separation works that well as an integrated product, because there will always be a 3rd party solution that is better.
Apple is trying hard to re-brand itself as an AI company, so it makes sense for them.
Steinberg has one of the better stem separation solutions, in their Spectralayers suite, but that is also sold as 3rd party, and the pro version is not included in cubase. One thing that makes spectralayers so powerful, is that it also uses the AI/Machine learning for other uses, like de-reverb, something that is actually a tool for professionals, so it isn't just a stem separation tool.
But for any video talking about Stem separation, without any useful additional features, I think it is always best to be honest.
The use cases for stem separation is to be able to use beats, or vocals, in a project at the sketch stage, when you don't know if you will end up ever publishing, so you actually at that point don't need to license the content (or get access to the original multis/stems).
And with a built in stem separation, you can be sure that the reason to use stem separation with S1, is never to re-master a song where there are no multi-tracks available.
For fun, you can use stem separation to create karaoke tracks, with S1, you even have the ability to show the lyrics and chords on a simplified screen.
Or you can use it to practice along with the original track.
But those are not pro-uses, so not suitable for marketing.
Absolutely. I feel the same. No final use case for this feature. I use it (3rd party) for ripping guide vocals from client's example songs where I don't want their demo music, guitar or piano, merely so that I can have a soft vocal guide while producing a song's music. That's it! Everyone gets all excited about this feature. Why? Almost the same as the whole Dolby Atmos thing when 99% of people listen on headphones. All these features do sell DAWs though. I also find it useless to use a clip launcher for the type of music I produce. Anyway, the executives at Presonus will be smiling all the way to the bank.
@@ettiennelane9173 If Dolby atmos was a solution for making headphone mixes translate to speakers, or vice verse, I would see Atmos as meaningful. But it isn't. Atmos for headphones is an afterthought.
But I am a fan of surround sound, so I'm glad they support it, but it should be quite niche.
I have a different take on clip launches, I find them useful for sketching, and not just for loop based music, and I have heard the same from many others. So I do see a point of having that system. Combined with the chord track, and global transpose, and you have a pretty good system for producing sketches, and adopting them to singers. If you only have limited time with a vocalist, it is great to be able to get as quickly as possible to the takes you need.
When it comes to stem separation, I have absolutely no faith that presonus will keep developing it, and improving on it, to catch up with the best. I strongly believe that they will just fall further and further behind the best.
I am more confident in Steinberg, as it is a 3rd party solution and it already does more than just stem separation. I'm not convinced Apple will ever be class leading, but they might tweak it, to make most use of their NPUs in their CPUs, so as a technical demonstration, they will at least have some motivation to keep improving, and they will probably evolve it in to a more complete audio tool suite, in order for them to show off what their AI engine can do.
For a very specific, and not personal reason, I am looking for a stem separation solution, and there is an argument that getting a DAW with it build in, at the price of Studio one, and possibly with a discount, because of possible hardware purchases from Presonus. For that specific use case, the result of the stem separation does not need to be perfect, but I still don't feel comfortable with suggesting S1 as a solution, because it does not seem to deliver the same level of quality that one can get from other solutions and I do feel my endorsement of a product should reflect some level of quality of the result, even if this level might be fine for that specific use case.
Thanks Marcus! 👍
For me, one use of stem separation would be for referencing mixes. For example when I get asked to make the drums sound like (at least the style or overall eq) the drums from another song.
Marcus, great channel. Do you know anything about trying to use Spitfire libraries in Studio One with the Kontakt player?
superb lessons ! tnx
Hey Marcus. What are your thoughts on the use of a Synology NAS system with music production?
Do you use it? If so, how do you set it up and use it?
Nice Job.
Great video as always, much appreciated! But I couldn't be more underwhelmed by the features shown, is this really the best of it? Global transpose (couldn't this just be a macro if you needed it?), an integrated loop shop browser, and what is almost certainly the Demucs stem separation algorithm that has been free to use for years already. Increasingly I'm finding I only open Studio One for tempo mapping, which Bitwig is still catching up with. Maybe if the upgrade is discounted at some point I might move from v5, but this isn't looking like there's much future left in the software side of the company after the Fender acquisition.
At 19:35, it looked like you magically inserted the Pro EQ plug-in on the recently imported track - without a mouse click or anything. How did you do this??? (sorry if this is a widely-known shortcut that I've missed). Thanks - Cliff
Nice demonstration!
Unfortunately, the white highlights are now too bright and starts to hurt the eyes after a few hours.
There seems to be no way of reducing the harsh brightness any more.
What's the best way to move to a next version of Studio One? I ask myself this question with every upgrade, but now I'd appreciate proper expert advice.
Have they fixed the transientdetection yet when creating midi with bendmarkers that has been requested for multiple years?
quick question, after selecting and downloading the desired sample from splice WHERE is the sample downloaded to? is it simply copied neatly into that song's project folder or is it downloaded somewhere else on your hard drive from which studio one references it? thanks!!
Sick
Is this tempo detection....is this kinda doing Vocalign as well ?
Stem Separation is a game changer, but way to many artifacts. As a engineer what kinda processing do you believe can eliminate that, when a noise gate cant?
South Africa first
It would be nice if S1 could automatically name audio files when Chord track or Global transpose has been used, and commited, so we can see how it has been changed. If you can, you should always re-record the audio, but it can help a lot to commit and then not have to think about re-recording for a while.
This is a very good update and it’s really pretty, but unfortunately it’s been extremely buggy for me. Crashed a powerful Mac a couple of times froze up once wiped out all of my templates and shortcut settings macros so beware if you upgrade back up all of that stuff first Luckily I had another rig. But even the rounded edges and the performance on the editing screen feels more solid. I’m sure the bugs will get worked out as they get reported, but this is a good one.
Can the global transpose be automated?
Hi Marcus, sorry if my comment hasn’t relate to the video.
I am still at studio one 5.5ish, have no need upgrade to 6.
Now i have a song and has tempo track enabled when tracking. After all have been done, i export mixdown that song and the click still audible in this mixdown although i have disable the tempo track by un-tick the tempo track and off all the metronome before export mixdown.
If you have a solution please guide me through, thank you.
Once you download the Splice sound, is it there after you no longer have your Splice account active?
Yes, I just checked. Haven't been on Spice in ages. No active account. Was able to download one of the samples I purchased like 3 years ago.
Also, while my sub was active I snagged all the songs and stuck em on an hdd. Still got em.
Ummmm.....so im posting another reply. i was able to do it using the website earlier (download my sample) but I was NOT able to do it using the Splice desktop app for Windows. I have no idea what is up with that. The app lets me see my sounds but there is an error when I try to download them. honestly, i would just avoid Splice at this point. The feature in SO7 is neato and tempting but Splice kinda sucks.
6:20 A wild James Brown sample appeared!
Would be nice if Studio One offer amp profiling own amps.
Hi marcus
I have a really wierd experience with studio one .. espicially in mastering . It didnt sound so good … from your stand studio one is as good sounding / summing / processingn / mixdown as logic / protools ? In other words … do you trust it for pro mixing / mastering ?
Guys @presonus may you please fix the stem export speed , sometimes it takes up to 3 to 4 hours to export less than 100 tracks .
Hey Marcus, can you help a guy who needs to learn how to mix so that it’s broadcast quality? I pretty much use VST’s.
Is the copy of presence xt that comes with s1 7 also perpetual when the sub (presonus+) ends?
Or is it sub only now?
All the instruments are perpetual
Are these features only on the Pro version?
There's only one version now.
I’ve never used the tempo map. I’m not entirely sure what the goal even is here. Is the idea to simply get everything to follow that tempo map? 🤷🏻♂️ Someone help me out here please.
the splice thing is really cool but i have so many samples as it is on my hard drive!!!!!!!! lol
This Band reminds me of a band from Austin Texas from way back called
" Retarded Elf"
I thought the Global Transpose would be more like Logic's Varispeed :/
tempo map gee thats a very old feature on some other daws like Logic pro i used it about 5 years ago
I'm on V7 now. All those nice new features mean nothing, when the software crashes 3 times in half an hour. Nightmare.
Not sure stem separation integration is a good idea, since this is a technology that's evolving rapidly. So there's a high probability it will become also-ran within months.
The question is will in version 7 playback icon on 14 inch mac book screen take up 1/4 of screen real estate? ( studio one not scaling)? If yes it’s shame..
Studio One scales just fine. I have a MacBook Pro and have no issues. So what are you talking about dude?
In fact, what is awesome is that it independently scales for as many screens as you have. I've got the 16-in MacBook Pro, a 65-in OLED and a 38-in curved 5K main monitor... I can scale each and every one of them independently And the screens totally adjust perfectly! If I need bigger fonts on one particular screen it rescales perfectly. I could never do this on my Windows machines... It totally sucked. So again, what the f are you talking about?
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE USER OF STUDIO ONE PRO? PLUS WHO ARE STILL IN RUNNING THEIR SUBSCRIPTION.
I am already a studio one pro.Plus user. I still have few more months to go.
HAVE NO CLARITY ON THIS
☹Presonus keeps forgetting how music works.
Transients-to-tempo is not auto-tempo. Logic takes free-rec piano (no kick required) and Q's into clean notation (easier to edit notation, for that matter, as S1 forget Notion's auto-rests). Logic and StaffPad are just more musical to me, plus free updates. Not sour... just thinking this is sold as better than it really is. No?
hi i purchase v6 artist sept-6 and i didn't get what they said! it woulb be any replies please to help?
I’m pretty sure You had to upgrade to professional.
@@dfhm-pq2cf they said any version 6 after augaust first right?
@@dfhm-pq2cf Upgrade Offers: Users who purchased Studio One 6 after August 1st, 2024, will get a free upgrade to version 7 with a year of updates. Studio One Pro Plus: Renamed from Studio One Plus, this subscription plan is available at $179 per year, offering cloud tools, content, and perpetual license discounts
Hi, I don’t know if anyone is willing to give out a copy of studio one license for free as I am in great need of one and can’t afford it at the moment, I don’t want to use cracked softwares anymore as I don’t get to enjoy the full benefits of original software. Anyone please?????
Mow lawns, rake leaves….work for it.
My favourite feature is how you can’t rent to own it and pay monthly for it or in full 😅🙈☠️
Too me this isn't a great update. Seems to me they are going after the low end users the "Beat maker"... The " Loop Kids" but yet they still won't do anything for the professional film composer. There is still no way to line up a marker and time code. Yes you can change the time signature but why put in all the other tools and not that. But lets spend our time on flashy easy to use loop BS.. Disappointing.
I kinda feel the same. They're calling it "pro" but added features that i've never seen a "pro-user" use.
I get that they're trying to extend their user-range. But they left out professional users with this update.
This feels more like a 6.x update to me, rather than a "7".
Have to agree. Not in a rush to upgrade with these mainly "Loop Kids" features...
And i do see something that looks a bit similar to Logic Pro in the new Studio One 7. The edit page all the tracks does look almost the same with Logic Pro tho. Why? Why can't they design something different from other daw? I do like Studio One because it's snappy but it feels like I'm using a copycat version of Logic Pro when it comes to Studio One 7 tho.
I would have thought film composers would be using Digital Performer.
Its amazing how people can bring snobbery and hubris to every vocation and artform. These people are the architects of their own misery.
welcome to Logic pro 10 🤣
So it sounds like, to me, if we are a studio or producer that works exclusively with real live musicians, there is absolutely nothing here that will apply to us and therefore, don't bother to upgrade.
Still not over that shameless plug.... but working on it....
Waste of money for what you get. I suppose no one is forcing me to uograde. I can do that at anytime. So let’s see when some serious updates happen . Not this trivial nonsense .
If it's gonna transpose the drums it's useless... you'd think they'd be smarter than that
Man…all this absolute garbage makes me want to switch to Reaper permanently. There’s just some things that Studio One does that I like so much I can’t quit them. Might happen soon though
After 5 minutes not showing the tempo detection just talking about it an showing already 3 to 5 steps for preparation, I knew I can shut down cause this is useless. check Logic Pro for such tasks. which one click I've got what you try to explain in endless time. Sorry...
Tnx a lot 😊
With the global transposition can it be inserted mid way through a track so that you can insert a key change rather than have it affect the entire length of the song
So.... basically just new features for EDM 🫤 Not really anything useful for audio / real instruments?
Nope.