Thanks, I finally get it. When I constructed the truth table, I missed the tautology part and I thought there's something wrong with my sequent or truth table. My lecturer and tutors weren't being helpful at all. I was just told that I still had a misunderstanding but they refused to answer my question. It's really annoying. I am so glad I found your vid.
Hold on, if T followed by F is the only time the conclusion is False, why 5:28 seconds into the video do you list F followed by T as False? Im so confused.
hi i just want to clarify so if all of the results are true then the statement is valid but otherwise it's false (one or more false in the result)? your response will help so much. tyia!❤️
We're also learning this right now and I'd like to ask something if its okay. What if the problem was (p->q), (r->s) .. then the conclusion is (p->s).. i think this is invalid but I'm not really sure and can the truth table be used as proof if it is indeed invalid?? Also, do you know what this kind of problem is? Thanks.
The reason it's set up the way it is makes it easier to remember the pattern, grade the work, and make sure all combinations of TF are represented. It might end up with a different pattern of T/F at the end, and if you're using an online grading system, it might be marked incorrect.
thank you, it really helps me. my lecturer didnt really explain much. tomorrow is my exam, goodluck to me.
Thanks, I finally get it. When I constructed the truth table, I missed the tautology part and I thought there's something wrong with my sequent or truth table. My lecturer and tutors weren't being helpful at all. I was just told that I still had a misunderstanding but they refused to answer my question. It's really annoying. I am so glad I found your vid.
Glad the video helped
U seriously saved me from getting to be fail in my exam , oh thank u soooooooooooooooo much 🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
Hold on, if T followed by F is the only time the conclusion is False, why 5:28 seconds into the video do you list F followed by T as False? Im so confused.
Thank you so much
You make its easy to understand once again thank you again
Thanks you helped me alot god bless you❤
Thank you maam
You explained very well
Thank you, this helps a lot.
Would two false premises making a false conclusion be valid?
hi i just want to clarify so if all of the results are true then the statement is valid but otherwise it's false (one or more false in the result)? your response will help so much. tyia!❤️
Yes, if you end with a tautology (all true), then it is valid. If there are any false statements, it is invalid, because it's not always true.
We're also learning this right now and I'd like to ask something if its okay. What if the problem was (p->q), (r->s) .. then the conclusion is (p->s).. i think this is invalid but I'm not really sure and can the truth table be used as proof if it is indeed invalid?? Also, do you know what this kind of problem is? Thanks.
Still need help with this? 💀
For 3 statement , Can i write at second column one true and one false alternate, at final column two true and two false alternate?
The reason it's set up the way it is makes it easier to remember the pattern, grade the work, and make sure all combinations of TF are represented. It might end up with a different pattern of T/F at the end, and if you're using an online grading system, it might be marked incorrect.
I want to ask one of our proposition was false do i start with a t t f or not?
What If we have false tautology, does it mean the argument is valid
It's only valid if it's always true. It it is always false, then it's never true.
Thanks!
Nice explanation
Thank you!
Very lengthy but nice explaining thank you!
Thank you for this
You're welcome
Thanks
thank you!
thank you very much
Is it fallacy?
Amazing thanks
You're welcome!
Thanks.
CFA bangcn SW confuse klmw
Thank you so much