Deeply unsettling to see an aircraft that I flew, being raised from the depths of the ocean. I had the pleasure of operating her with two different airlines in the 90s.
@@flightforensics4523 Do you have a source for this info? Initial reports from the coast guard stated the wreckage was enveloped by a large slick of jet fuel. Also the pilots were found soaked in jet fuel, so there was at least SOME fuel on board.
The intact rear section of the 737, with tail and main and rear wings still attached, proves the Captain did an exceptional job with zero engine power to slap her down true without tipping or cartwheeling. The man deserves some recognition because that clearly assured two lives were not lost that day.
Except that they didn't do an exceptional job as they caused the crash through pilot mistakes and shutting down the wrong engine after #2 lost power they thought it was number one due to poor airman ship and shutdown #1 - So if anything the pilot should be held accountable for the lose of the plane & Revenue to the company and pay some sort of fine or pay for it.
I watched this from my back yard. I’m so glad the pilots are alright and made it out alive. The fact that they were able to bring the aircraft so close to shore was a miracle.
Except that they caused the crash through pilot mistakes and shutting down the wrong engine after #2 lost power they thought it was number one due to poor airman ship and shutdown #1 - So if anything the pilot should be held accountable for the lose of the plane & Revenue to the company and pay some sort of fine or pay for it.
9:15 you can see 1/3 of the fuselage is missing. They definitely should have at least detected some small cracks during outside check. Somebody didn't do their job well.
07:55 I think this is the first time I've begun to get a true picture of the volume and complexity of the wiring in modern aircraft. It looks like two miles of wire right there alone.
I know the feeling of seeing a plane in pieces that you have flown. I my case it was TWA 800 747 off Long Island . I had flown the same flight, 800, exactly 4 years previously, and the same aircraft many times before
It is amazing the resources the NTSB will put into investigating JT8 engines, which are ancient and some of the most studied aircraft engines ever. The rules which require getting every single piece of new data even on ancient aircraft are why flying has become so amazingly safe.
of a crash they caused. continuing on one engine should have been routine, but they shut down the wrong engine. I'm hoping they didn't continue to work in aviation.
I remember seeing this on TV the morning of the crash. I was shocked. Things like this don’t happen very often in Hawaii. I (might) have saw N810TA before, it will be missed.
Looks like we had only one engine running at the time of impact. The relatively undamaged one looks like it wasn't turning at all apart from possible windmilling, but the other engine looks like it was at high power and broke apart.
The cause of the accident was an engine failure combined with the pilots shutting off the wrong engine and trying to fly with the damaged engine by mistake
@@wewd Approx 13.6 tons(9% of the plane's weight) of that model of 777 is made of titanium. Titanium can stay in sea water for 100 years without corrosion due to the highly active bond between titanium and oxygen.
yeah somewhere in the China Sea , where they found that "flaperon" near Madagascar. It was sent to be investigated and showed it had come from a 777. That one was the only one missing, so, it had to come from it. There was also some suitcase found but we did not hear anything specific about that. I expect they would be in the bottom, all sitting in their seats, as the ditching was likely controlled.or the damage of the leading edge on the flaperon would have been greater. A commercial pilot checked it out and determined, it had done successful ditching.....after that......who knows ? Even a controlled ditching would not likely have allowed any survivors to get out. This was not like ditching in the Hudson river.....We may never know but I think someone, somewhere knows something.........
That's because Boeing installed MCAS on one older 737 to test it before installing it on the MAX. It seems that this is the choosen aircraft. As like as the MAX crashes, the MCAS then caused this crash because it got false inputs from the angle-of-attac-sensors.
@@trvman1 Hawaii can have 20 to 30 foot seas in places. But the pilots of this aircraft were fortunate to crash close to the Honolulu airport...generally calmer area but also deep water.
1:40 WHAT the heck was That move? Is that the way to lower large parts; One person, One line Off Cleat, and 'drag' person across deck. 'clever'? looks fun. ugh =\
Was that the case with the two ultra competent pilots that decided to flip through manuals for a while rather than land a failing aircraft on the runway?
@@frankrizzo5594 bs. in this case they followed that logical flaw instead of the obvious return to runway. a checklist is if you are far from a runway and generally only useful if the situation isn't critical. With two pilots the obvious action is return to runway declaring an emergency and the copilot can flip through any applicable checklist. with engine trouble you of course don't take a 30 minute stroll over the ocean to nurse stupid checklists.
Think this is another waste of taxpayers money. What are they going to find out? One engine failed and another overheated leading to a second failure. We are so incredibly deep in debt I guess it just doesn’t matter anymore.
Looking at what investigations, especially by the ntsb, have done in aviation safety history I cannot agree to that statement. Worrying more about money than about safety is among the top reasons for crashes.
@@mkevilempire True. But he has a point. I wonder how much more crucial information they could attain by retrieving the entire airframe vs just the FDR and CVR. Just playing devils advocate
Deeply unsettling to see an aircraft that I flew, being raised from the depths of the ocean. I had the pleasure of operating her with two different airlines in the 90s.
Canair and Royal Aviation Exp?
Been there, agreed
Not to worry, She'll clean-right-up.
Shouldn't you know that they always engine problems than? How are you surprised at what make this plane is?
@@nellawell4976 Indeed. Most of that will buff right out.
Despite the plane being in multiple pieces, the crew survived and were rescued quickly after ditching.
Yes
Hello Scott :)
@@flightforensics4523 Do you have a source for this info? Initial reports from the coast guard stated the wreckage was enveloped by a large slick of jet fuel. Also the pilots were found soaked in jet fuel, so there was at least SOME fuel on board.
After seeing this its amazing they were able to escape. Any word on how they exited once they were in the water?
@@Tr0ll_m4ster Hullo*
The intact rear section of the 737, with tail and main and rear wings still attached, proves the Captain did an exceptional job with zero engine power to slap her down true without tipping or cartwheeling. The man deserves some recognition because that clearly assured two lives were not lost that day.
Except that they didn't do an exceptional job as they caused the crash through pilot mistakes and shutting down the wrong engine after #2 lost power they thought it was number one due to poor airman ship and shutdown #1
- So if anything the pilot should be held accountable for the lose of the plane & Revenue to the company and pay some sort of fine or pay for it.
I watched this from my back yard. I’m so glad the pilots are alright and made it out alive. The fact that they were able to bring the aircraft so close to shore was a miracle.
Except that they caused the crash through pilot mistakes and shutting down the wrong engine after #2 lost power they thought it was number one due to poor airman ship and shutdown #1 - So if anything the pilot should be held accountable for the lose of the plane & Revenue to the company and pay some sort of fine or pay for it.
@@tbas8741 I pray they are held accountable.
@7:00 you can clearly see that upper right pitot tube is bent. They definitely would have to replace it before releasing plane back on the line.
7:36 you can also see some wires hanging that might need to be secured before being put back into service
@@1000CalorieSnackPack 😂
9:15 you can see 1/3 of the fuselage is missing. They definitely should have at least detected some small cracks during outside check. Somebody didn't do their job well.
😂😂😂
All easily repairable zip ties and some friction tape
It’s a miracle how the pilots survived this with the cabin staying relatively intact. The fuselage has been sliced in half.
07:55
I think this is the first time I've begun to get a true picture
of the volume and complexity of the wiring in modern aircraft.
It looks like two miles of wire right there alone.
I know the feeling of seeing a plane in pieces that you have flown. I my case it was TWA 800 747 off Long Island . I had flown the same flight, 800, exactly 4 years previously, and the same aircraft many times before
Interesting information. Thx for sharing
Hell of a landing boys! Most of the plane was intact! Means he floated that sick bird down nicely!💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾
It is amazing the resources the NTSB will put into investigating JT8 engines, which are ancient and some of the most studied aircraft engines ever. The rules which require getting every single piece of new data even on ancient aircraft are why flying has become so amazingly safe.
I never thought they’d raise the whole thing from the bottom. Pretty cool to see
How deep?
@@irgski The wreckage was in 420 feet of water, 2 miles off Ewa Beach.
It's not that deep...
Thanks for publishing this. It's interesting to see what you guys and gals do.
Great Job! 👏🏻👏🏻💪🏻. 👋🏻 Greetings from Spain 🇪🇸.
Very important work. Thanks for the vid.
Fantastic that they both got out.
of a crash they caused. continuing on one engine should have been routine, but they shut down the wrong engine. I'm hoping they didn't continue to work in aviation.
Packages are still listed as delayed, in transit.
I remember seeing this on TV the morning of the crash. I was shocked. Things like this don’t happen very often in Hawaii. I (might) have saw N810TA before, it will be missed.
This is fascinating to watch.
Looks like we had only one engine running at the time of impact. The relatively undamaged one looks like it wasn't turning at all apart from possible windmilling, but the other engine looks like it was at high power and broke apart.
The cause of the accident was an engine failure combined with the pilots shutting off the wrong engine and trying to fly with the damaged engine by mistake
NTSB has a RUclips Channel 😳
Someday, I think we're going to also see MH370 pulled from the ocean like this. We can never stop looking, even if it takes 100 years.
Some fishermen will “snag” it and bring pieces to the surface…
Won't be much left in 100 years. Aluminum doesn't last long in seawater.
@@wewd Approx 13.6 tons(9% of the plane's weight) of that model of 777 is made of titanium. Titanium can stay in sea water for 100 years without corrosion due to the highly active bond between titanium and oxygen.
yeah somewhere in the China Sea , where they found that "flaperon" near Madagascar. It was sent to be investigated and showed it had come from a 777. That one was the only one missing, so, it had to come from it. There was also some suitcase found but we did not hear anything specific about that. I expect they would be in the bottom, all sitting in their seats, as the ditching was likely controlled.or the damage of the leading edge on the flaperon would have been greater. A commercial pilot checked it out and determined, it had done successful ditching.....after that......who knows ? Even a controlled ditching would not likely have allowed any survivors to get out. This was not like ditching in the Hudson river.....We may never know but I think someone, somewhere knows something.........
Quick, somebody get the cockpit for their 737 Max simulator!
Both pilots of this cargo plane survived. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transair_Flight_810
Both pilots were responsible for the crash.
Saw this from my house.
No audio on this?
Did pilots survive from cockpit windows?
WOW !
So this is basically just telling me to sit in the back of the plane on a trip over the sea
How long do you think before the black boxes are recovered?
I assume since the tailsection is still intact, that they are still in there.
Today the Aviation Herald reported that both, CVR and FDR, were recovered by the NTSB.
737 engines for sale, ran when parked. No low ballers, I know what I have.
Lmao this is classic
....and, NO, I don't want your old airplane or beater car as a "partial trade"! LMAO!
It is curious as to why the stabilator would be in full nose-down trim? I will assume it is as a result of the impact and settling...
good observation!
That's because Boeing installed MCAS on one older 737 to test it before installing it on the MAX. It seems that this is the choosen aircraft. As like as the MAX crashes, the MCAS then caused this crash because it got false inputs from the angle-of-attac-sensors.
@@THYB737 Source?
Why no sound?!?
Why no sound.
Welcome to Hawaii, Aloha.
Good thing it didn't happened off the East Coast of Mainland US. The ocean is never this calm. 2 foot seas are considered a really calm day :)
@@trvman1 Hawaii can have 20 to 30 foot seas in places. But the pilots of this aircraft were fortunate to crash close to the Honolulu airport...generally calmer area but also deep water.
Am I going to hell for thinking the scene starting at 9:16 was moderately comical
Little speed tape and she will be back on the line in no time.
"I'm Phil Swift here with the flex tape and watch how we make this crashed airplane ready for flight again using only the flax tape"
It only took 3 months to recover the airplane.
Ya'll need to talk to the USCSB about how to make a RUclips video
Deus fez a altura pra ele mesmo ou seja o firmamento.
It'll buff out.
I have repaired aircraft much worse than this and I have found super-glue works the best.
Deixa eu viajar de automóvel mesmo avião estou fora!!
That is hundreds of times more dangerous
No sound on this vt??????
1:40 WHAT the heck was That move?
Is that the way to lower large parts; One person, One line Off Cleat, and 'drag' person across deck. 'clever'? looks fun. ugh =\
Next stop: Gilligan’s Island 🏝
*Sigh* Poor thing. She didn’t deserve this…
I guess good thing it went down near a continental shelf.
Otherwise it would have gone the way of MH370
…it’ll buff out…
It had to crash it flew out of IN NO WAY airport.
Most of that should just buff out by the looks of it ..........................
can you delete this, and repost it showing us the pictures that were taken of inside the cockpit?
Was that the case with the two ultra competent pilots that decided to flip through manuals for a while rather than land a failing aircraft on the runway?
Yes. You can still watch the video on the RUclips Channel of VASAviation. Blancolirio aka Juan Browne made also a very good video about this accident.
@@NicolaW72 Link?
@@gwinterboer Just type in this channel names into the search function of youtube and you will find easily the two channels.
The checklists are written with the blood of pilots who didn't do them.
@@frankrizzo5594 bs. in this case they followed that logical flaw instead of the obvious return to runway. a checklist is if you are far from a runway and generally only useful if the situation isn't critical. With two pilots the obvious action is return to runway declaring an emergency and the copilot can flip through any applicable checklist. with engine trouble you of course don't take a 30 minute stroll over the ocean to nurse stupid checklists.
I wonder what make this plane is that had engine problems again? 🤔 Hmmm...I wonder...🤣
Think this is another waste of taxpayers money. What are they going to find out? One engine failed and another overheated leading to a second failure. We are so incredibly deep in debt I guess it just doesn’t matter anymore.
Looking at what investigations, especially by the ntsb, have done in aviation safety history I cannot agree to that statement.
Worrying more about money than about safety is among the top reasons for crashes.
@@mkevilempire True. But he has a point. I wonder how much more crucial information they could attain by retrieving the entire airframe vs just the FDR and CVR. Just playing devils advocate
Cost of the recovery is provided by the air carrier’s insurance company. The investigation costs itself by the NTSB
@@mkevilempire there is a level of diminishing returns and in this case I doubt it’ll enhance safety much. Other cases yes.
Finding out what happened makes sure that this doesn’t happen again