History Matters: Prof. Deborah Lipstadt
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 фев 2018
- Prof. Deborah Lipstadt (Emory University) on antisemitism past and present
History Matters brings prominent historians to the Center for Jewish History to reflect on the importance of the study of the past for understanding the present. Each evening of the series will offer rich conversation between a leading historian and a moderator about how that historian’s research illuminates timely issues. In putting historical scholarship into dialogue with present-day concerns, this series will highlight the importance of history - and especially Jewish history - in public discourse.
The History Matters Series is generously sponsored by Dina and Jonathan Leader.
Presented by: the Center for Jewish History
![Natanael Cano x Oscar Maydon - Giza [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eXCS6-MSQ_Y/mqdefault.jpg)
I want to see a Lipstadt v Irving debate!!!
There was one … when he sued her. Was a bad move on his part.
@@t.l.1610 I know right can't go up against swej and their money power
Watch the trial . Also , it’s pretty silly to want to give Holocaust deniers a platform as if they have legitimacy of any sort .
@@destinybaron5115 there were many holocausts. Bengal famine killed millions
History matters as long as it zog version of it
My 'anybody can do logistics' story:
My cousin lives in a community in North Carolina too small to have a resident rabbi.
Being gentile, her volunteer job is to drive the guest rabbi in from the bus station, late Sabbath evenings, and back the next day.
So this Presbyterian is a mainstay of the shul.
Nauseating the way you fall over yourselves to grovel for Jews.
@Genesis 12:3 = Matthew 25:31-46
Some believe and do good for a reason.
Oy vey! I shall take my own advice to others and delve into my own well-thumbed copy of Maimonides's great work, 'A Guide for the Perplexed'. Wait a minute. I think I've just cottoned on to the enigmatic point you make: the metaphoric approach you apply here is but a ruse to get us halfwits ready to rumble just what it is you're trying to say. Got it! However, I suggest you edit out the bit about the Rabbi being driven from the bus station "late Sabbath evening". Got that, have you?
My hero !! Thank you for standing up for the 6 million souls which perished and the survivors.
I wonder why these people always feel the need to legislate that you "believe" them? Thats odd. Usually the TRUTH speaks for itself.
When did "these people" (and thank you for outing yourself as a neo-Nazi by saying that) legislate that you believe them?
I appreciate this woman's work
Precursor Queen of Cancel Culture.
If you have never read a book by David Irving, don’t comment!
It is he who sued her and wanted to cancel her.
@@Biyer11 he simply wanted to protect his reputation. in hindsight, he should have ignored her. but the trial did do something for the cause - it showed that there is no new argument to bring from their side. they rely on the flawed and faked history which will eventually crumble to dust.
@@Lee-wg7en Piffle
@@Lee-wg7en how could u possibly call Richard Evan's history flawed and faked - that's literally all david irving is.
Did Jews really coin clip?
As a numismatist, clipped hammered gold coinage of the time (medieval era) doesn't carry any pointers on that slur.
LIEZ
Is no antisemitism
There’s no need for all this. Just show the evidence. Oh.
She's a professor now?! Of what?!
Chutzpah
She's a respected scholar; she'd already been a professor at Emory University for several years before the pseudo-historian Nazi sympathizer David Irving made the stupid mistake of suing her for telling the truth about him.
@@jonbornholdt1790 She courageously debated David Irving & put him in his place! I just can't find the video. Could you forward this respected scholar's debate. Thanks.
@@garyvanarsdale3142 I'm not aware of a "debate" between them in the normal sense. In fact, it would surprise me if she had ever voluntarily given him a platform to debate her, since that would imply a level of respect for him and his "ideas" that she would almost certainly be unwilling to grant him. She did attend the libel trial, but for legal reasons she didn't testify. You can read about the trial in two books: Lipstadt, History on Trial; Evans, Lying about Hitler. The titles might be different depending on whether you're in the USA or Britain.
@@jonbornholdt1790 Thanks Jon. I had family who went into those camps. Ad hominem's are the weak man's debating tactic. (I always look for them). Irving's account on our fire bombing of Dresden was heralded by all historians of that era due to his unrelenting hunt for original source documentation. It was indeed a bestseller. By many, Lipstadt's refusal to debate this famed historian on one aspect of World War II is not brave, wise, or standing on principle. It is seen by many as cowardly and could have helped put Irving in his place.
She is a paradox and a hippocrite as she has no compunction about labelling individuals racist without ever having spoken to them..