Inov-8 F-Lite G 300 Review | Is It REALLY the Toughest Trainer?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @frankb5693
    @frankb5693 4 года назад +3

    Great review, thanks Jake!

  • @calehiaring9145
    @calehiaring9145 5 месяцев назад

    Great review, but what is your leg doing?

  • @nofarhagoel6864
    @nofarhagoel6864 4 года назад +1

    Which shoes do u reccomend more for light running and light weightlift in the gym? These ones or inov-8 260 knit or UA hovr rise or reebok speed tr flexweave?.. i wanna buy the best versitle multi purpose option.

  • @afyaabrafi5433
    @afyaabrafi5433 4 года назад

    Thanks for the review. Which of their models would you reccomend for flat wide feet?

    • @Barbend
      @Barbend  4 года назад +1

      That's a tough one. A lot of their models fit slimmer naturally. In terms of width, the G 300 is wider than the other Inov's I've reviewed, but I don't think I'm comfortable recommending them solely for a wide feet need. - Jake

    • @afyaabrafi5433
      @afyaabrafi5433 4 года назад +1

      @@Barbend Thanks very much for your response. I guess I'll just stick with the Nano 8 and 9.

    • @doubletopsecret1
      @doubletopsecret1 10 месяцев назад

      Great question. I guess I keep looking.

  • @justinpatrickhoffman
    @justinpatrickhoffman 4 года назад

    Kinda wished they had a hoop on the heel of the shoe. Oh well. Still seems good.
    Also, on a bit of a tangent, I thought you guys had a full video review of the Reebok Nano 8. However, I can’t seem to find it on your playlist.

  • @guisantos2766
    @guisantos2766 4 года назад

    Great review. But one quick note, it’s not the first cross training shoe to use Graphene. The Inov-8 F-Lite G 290’s were the first. They are the first cross training shoes to have a Graphene midsole though!

    • @Barbend
      @Barbend  4 года назад

      Smh. Thanks for pointing that out. :) - Jake

  • @beyondtraining_
    @beyondtraining_ 4 года назад

    It seems a good option for those seaking something else except Nanos and Metcons! How do they compare performance wise? Thanks

    • @Barbend
      @Barbend  4 года назад +2

      Performance wise, they're solid! The only tiny difference between the models is the 6mm to 4mm heel-to-toe offset, but it's not that noticeable, IMO. I actually favor this model for ballistic movements over the Nanos and put them neck and neck with the Metcons. - Jake

    • @beyondtraining_
      @beyondtraining_ 4 года назад

      @@Barbend thanks! Keep up the awesome reviews!

  • @bcloer86
    @bcloer86 4 года назад

    Would this be a better deal at $67? I found some that are at that price point currently...

  • @NahNeverThat
    @NahNeverThat 3 года назад

    how has the shoe held up?

  • @leotorres4425
    @leotorres4425 4 года назад

    These vs nano 9 vs metcon 5 for squats, deadlifts, and just regular lifting minor plyo?

    • @Barbend
      @Barbend  4 года назад

      Tbh, they're all really solid. Nano feel best, Metcon are the "most" stable, and Inov-8 are best for plyos. But those are minor details, as they all perform really well. - Jake

    • @leotorres4425
      @leotorres4425 4 года назад

      @@Barbend I ended up buying the metcon 5s and the nano 9s. Recieved the Nanos first and loved them to wear around but once at the gym I felt way too much cushion made me feel as if I was leaning to much on my toes(squats). Went and bought the metcon and was a bit snug but felt lile I broke them in did some squats and made a huge difference on the "stability". Nanos are great if you're using as a cross trainer but I do more gym workouts occasional plyo but returning the Nanos(great for what they were made for). Thanks man.

  • @cjscarborough83
    @cjscarborough83 4 года назад

    How would you rate this for running?

    • @Barbend
      @Barbend  4 года назад

      7/10. Not great for longer runs. - Jake